Academic literature on the topic 'Agenda Digitale Europea'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Agenda Digitale Europea.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Agenda Digitale Europea"
Piceci, Luigi, Anna Maria Mariani, and Francesco Peluso Cassese. "Train teachers in digital citizenship to facilitate a sustainable education system." Form@re - Open Journal per la formazione in rete 21, no. 3 (December 31, 2021): 105–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.36253/form-12114.
Full textLedo-Andión, Margarita, Antía López-Gómez, and Enrique Castelló-Mayo. "The role of original version cinema into the European digital space." Comunicar 25, no. 51 (April 1, 2017): 73–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/c51-2017-07.
Full textKamolov, Sergey, and Igor Stepnov. "Sustainability through digitalization: European strategy." E3S Web of Conferences 208 (2020): 03048. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020803048.
Full textArmas Quintá, Francisco José, and José Carlos Macía Arce. "The Information Society in Europe: Policies to Stem the Digital Divide." Quaestiones Geographicae 32, no. 2 (June 1, 2013): 25–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2013-0011.
Full textJiménez González, Aitor, and Ekaitz Cancela Rodríguez. "¿Es posible gobernar a las plataformas digitales? Análisis crítico de la Ley Europea de Servicios Digitales." Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales Avance en línea (October 20, 2022): 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/tekn.82074.
Full textSalminen, Mirva, and Kamrul Hossain. "Digitalisation and human security dimensions in cybersecurity: an appraisal for the European High North." Polar Record 54, no. 2 (March 2018): 108–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247418000268.
Full textKachouie, Samaneh, and César Castilla. "Evolución y Perspectivas de la brecha digital en la Unión Europea." ComHumanitas: revista científica de comunicación 9, no. 2 (February 27, 2019): 101–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.31207/rch.v9i2.168.
Full textCifuentes-Faura, Javier. "Digital Agenda, New Technologies and Education for the Integration of Europe: an Economic Study." European Integration Studies 1, no. 15 (September 16, 2021): 55–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.1.15.28296.
Full textBadenoch, Alexander. "Harmonized Spaces, Dissonant Objects, Inventing Europe? Mobilizing Digital Heritage." Culture Unbound 3, no. 3 (October 25, 2011): 295–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.113295.
Full textIrimie, Rada Cristina. "Digital Revolution: Europe at the Lead of New Technologies." European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research 2, no. 1 (December 30, 2014): 166. http://dx.doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v2i1.p166-183.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Agenda Digitale Europea"
DUNI, DANIELA. "Le azioni dell’UE per l’informatizzazione. Dagli strumenti di base ai procedimenti telematici." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/11584/266714.
Full textJaume, Bennasar Andrés. "Las nuevas tecnologías en la administración de justicia. La validez y eficacia del documento electrónico en sede procesal." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de les Illes Balears, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/9415.
Full textLa primera cuestión se centra en la configuración de los Sistemas de Información de la Oficina Judicial y del Ministerio Fiscal, así como de la informatización de los Registros Civiles, donde el art. 230 LOPJ es la pieza clave. Se estudian sus programas, aplicaciones, la videoconferencia, los ficheros judiciales y las redes de telecomunicaciones que poseen la cobertura de la firma electrónica reconocida, donde cobran gran relevancia los convenios de colaboración tecnológica. La digitalización de las vistas quizá sea una de las cuestiones con más trascendencia, teniendo en cuenta que el juicio es el acto que culmina el proceso. Aunque no todos los proyectos adoptados en el ámbito de la e.justicia se han desarrollado de forma integral, ni han llegado a la totalidad de los órganos judiciales. El objetivo final es lograr una Justicia más ágil y de calidad, a lo cual aspira el Plan Estratégico de Modernización de la Justicia 2009-2012 aprobado recientemente.
En referencia a la segunda perspectiva, no cabe duda que el Ordenamiento jurídico y los tribunales, en el ámbito de la justicia material, otorgan plena validez y eficacia al documento electrónico. Nuestra línea de investigación se justifica porque cada vez son más los procesos que incorporan soportes electrónicos de todo tipo, ya sea al plantearse la acción o posteriormente como medio de prueba (art. 299.2 LEC). Entre otros temas examinamos el documento informático, la problemática que rodea al fax, los sistemas de videograbación y el contrato electrónico.
La tesi s'encarrega d'analitzar, per una part, la integració i el desenvolupament de les noves tecnologies dins l´Administració de Justícia; i, per l'altra, els paràmetres que constitueixen la validesa i l'eficàcia del document electrònic.
La primera qüestió es centra en la configuració dels Sistemes d´Informació de l´Oficina Judicial i del Ministeri Fiscal, així com de la informatització dels Registres Civils, on l'art. 230 LOPJ es la peça clau. S'estudien els seus programes, aplicacions, la videoconferència, el fitxers judicials i les xarxes de telecomunicacions que tenen la cobertura de la firma electrònica reconeguda, on cobren gran rellevància els convenis de col·laboració tecnològica. La digitalització de les vistes tal vegada sigui una de les qüestions amb més transcendència, tenint amb compte que el judici es l'acte que culmina el procés. Però no tots el projectes adoptats en l'àmbit de la e.justicia s'han desenvolupat d'una manera integral ni han arribat a la totalitat dels òrgans judicials. L'objectiu final es assolir una Justícia més àgil i de qualitat, al que aspira el Pla Estratègic de Modernització de la Justícia 2009-2012 aprovat recentment.
En referència a la segona perspectiva, no hi ha dubte que l´Ordenament jurídic i els tribunals, en l'àmbit de la justícia material, donen plena validesa i eficàcia al document electrònic. La nostra línia d'investigació es justifica perquè cada vegada son més el processos que incorporen suports electrònics de tot tipus, ja sigui quant es planteja l'acció o posteriorment como a medi de prova (art. 299.2 LEC). Entre altres temes examinem el document informàtic, la problemàtica que envolta al fax, els sistemes de videogravació i el contracte electrònic.
The thesis seeks to analyse, on the one hand, the integration and development of the new technologies in the Administration of Justice; and, on the other, the parameters which constitute the validity and efficiency of the electronic document.
The first question centres on the configuration of the Information Systems of the Judicial Office and the Public Prosecutor, as well as the computerisation of the Civil Registers, where the art. 230 LOPJ it's the part key. Their programmes, applications, the Video Conferencing, the judicial registers and the telecommunication networks which are covered by the recognised electronic signatures, are studied, where the agreements on technological collaboration gain great relevance. The digitalisation of evidence might perhaps be one of the questions with most consequence, bearing in mind that the judgment is the act by which the process is culminated. Although not all the projects adopted within the compass of e.justice have developed completely nor have reached all the judicial organs. The final objective is to achieve an agile, quality Justice, to which the recently approved Strategic Plan for the Modernisation of Justice aspires.
With reference to the second perspective, there is no doubt that the juridical Ordinance and the tribunals within the compass of material justice grant full validity and efficacy to the electronic document. Our line of investigation is justified because there are more and more processes which are sustained by electronic supports of all kinds, whether it be at the establishment of the action or later, as a proof of it (art. 299.2 LEC). Amongst other things, we examine the computerised document, the problems which surround the fax, the systems for video recording and the electronic contract.
Campos, Paulo Alexandre Belo. "Assessing the age-related digital divide : evidence for the European Union-28." Master's thesis, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10362/19248.
Full textThis paper focuses on measuring the age-related digital divide, i.e., the digital gap between countries, considering data disaggregated for the generation (every 20 years) of their population. Our findings suggest that generation plays a key role to differentiate inequalities in Social Networks and Internet use, although it is not a clear feature to distinguish the use of e-Services. The results reveal that the Netherlands and Luxemburg have the lowest domestic digital divide. In opposition, Croatia and Cyprus present the highest digital disparities, particularly the Baby Boomers (55-74 years) and Generation Y (16-34 years). Considering all generations, the digital leaders are Sweden, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Luxemburg. The lagged European countries are Romania and Bulgaria. Among generations, Baby Boomers are far from Generation Y in ICT adoption, while Generation X (35-54 years) plays an important role in bridging both generations. Results point to the presence of an age-related digital divide across the European Union.
Fernandes, Aníbal Manuel da Costa. "A dimensão política da segurança para o ciberespaço na União Europeia : a agenda digital, a estratégia de cibersegurança e a cooperação UE-OTAN." Master's thesis, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.3/3318.
Full textA Cibersegurança é um conceito cada vez mais presente nas agendas dos mais variados atores e instituições ao nível político dos países da Comunidade Internacional e na disciplina de Relações Internacionais (RI). Na União Europeia (UE), a problemática dos assuntos relacionados com a segurança do quinto domínio de geoestratégia –o Ciberespaço– não é recente, datando de 2001. Essas preocupações surgiram como resultado do aparecimento de ações criminosas através da utilização de meios eletrónicos nos primórdios da Internet e da Web e foram devidamente sinalizadas pela INTERPOL. Com a implosão da União Soviética e países afins, o recrudescimento do crime organizado privilegiou o Cibercrime como modo de operações preferencial, devido ao anonimato e à dificuldade de atribuição e persecução criminal, –pela natureza insegura do Ciberespaço– e ao fácil retorno de investimento (ROI). O Conselho da Europa (CdE) é a primeira instituição política europeia que deteta a situação e trabalha arduamente no sentido de enquadrar o problema através da Convenção em 2001. A UE introduz a problemática da segurança na sua agenda política muito pelo aparecimento e aceitação dessa Convenção, que constituiu um catalisador. Associado à problemática da segurança do crime eletrónico, estava a necessidade de incrementar a utilização da Sociedade de Informação e a consequente Economia de Conhecimento, como instrumentos de crescimento económico e luta contra a infoexclusão. Esta estratégia inseriu-se nas iniciativas eSociety e nos consequentes Planos de Ação de 2002, 2005 e de 2010. A criação da Agência Europeia de Segurança das Redes e da Informação (ENISA), em 2004, foi uma decisão acertada, devido à necessidade prospetiva de importância do Ciberespaço e da Internet para a UE e para o mundo. Também é com o recrudescimento do terrorismo no 09/11 (2001) e dos ataques de Madrid e de Londres que a Proteção das Infraestruturas Críticas de Informação (PIC[I]) entraram nas Agendas de Segurança da UE. No entanto, seria com os acontecimentos na Estónia (EE) em 2007, que a UE –entre outros– tomava a verdadeira consciência da problemática da segurança no Ciberespaço. Nessa altura, a UE introduz uma diferenciação positiva entre os assuntos relacionados com a eSociety e a autonomia de assuntos ligados às Redes e Sistemas de Informação (RSI) –Cibersegurança na “linguagem” da UE. A partir desta altura, a ENISA deixou de ser uma agência de pesquisa, passando a ser uma instituição de conceção e implementação de soluções de segurança para o Ciberespaço na UE, nos Estados Membros (EMs) e com instituições extracomunitárias. Com a entrada em funções da Comissão Europeia (CE) designada por "Barroso–II", começaram a ser desenvolvidos dois instrumentos importantes para as políticas do Ciberespaço da UE: A Agenda Digital e a Estratégia de Cibersegurança (ECS). Este trabalho é relacionado, mais especificamente, com o seu Pilar III da Confiança e da Segurança, daquela Agenda Digital e com as prioridades da UE-ECS. É também na vigência da mesma CE, que o Serviço Europeu de Ação Externa (SEAE) pelo Tratado de Lisboa, passou a ter maiores responsabilidades na definição e execução de ações relativas à Política Externa e de Segurança Comum (PESC) e na articulação da dimensão externa de ações da Política Comum de Segurança e Defesa (PCSD)/Política Europeia de Segurança e Defesa (PESD). Não existem mecanismos de segurança para o Ciberespaço e para a Internet completos e 100% seguros, porque aquela não é dicotómica mas sim gradativa. Ela é conseguida através de vários vetores de intervenção, nomeadamente, a Resiliência, combate ao Cibercrime e a Dissuasão. Se a ENISA tem trabalhado na primeira, será necessário desenvolver as outras. O Centro Europeu de Luta contra o Cibercrime (EC3) tentará enfrentar o segundo. Já a Agência Europeia de Defesa (AED) poderá contribuir para, potenciando sinergias, em cooperação com a Organização do Tratado do Atlântico Norte (OTAN), desenvolver a terceira, pois a OTAN há vários anos tem vindo a trabalhar na referida área e a que pertencem a grande maioria dos EMs da UE, sendo os restantes parceiros.
ABSTRACT: The Cybersecurity is increasingly present in the agendas of many actors and institutions at the political level of the International Community countries and the International Relations (IR) discipline. In the European Union (EU) those problematic issues related to the security field of the fifth domain of geostrategy –Cyberspace– is not recent. The first approach was in 2001 by the European Commission (EC). These concerns appeared as a result of the emergence of criminal activities through the use of electronic media in the early days of the Internet and the Web and were properly marked by INTERPOL. With the implosion of the Soviet Union and allied countries, the increase of organized crime privileged Cybercrime as preferred mode of operations, due to anonymity and the difficulty of attribution and criminal prosecution, -the insecure nature of cyberspace- and the easy return on "investment" (ROI). It is the Council of Europe (CoE) the first European political institution that detects the situation and work hard in order to frame the issue through a Convention in 2001. The EU introduces the issues of security in their political Agenda to quite the emergence and acceptance of the Convention who "speed-up" the political process. Associated with the issues of security of electronic crime was the need to increase the use of the Information Society and Knowledge Economy consequent as an instrument of economic growth and the fight against info-exclusion. This strategy was part of the initiatives eSociety and subsequent Action Plans 2002, 2005 and 2010.The creation of the European Network Information Security Agency (ENISA), in 2004, was a good decision, because of the need for prospective importance of Cyberspace and the Internet to the EU and to the world. Also with the increase of terrorism in 09/11 (2001) and the Madrid and London attacks which concerns on the Protection of Critical Infrastructure Information, entered the EU Security Agenda. However, it would be with the events in Estonia in 2007, the EU –among others– that take true awareness of the problem of security in cyberspace. At that time, the EU introduced a positive differentiation among related issues eSociety and autonomy of subjects related to Networks and Information Systems (NIS) –which means Cybersecurity in the "language" of the EU. Therefore ENISA is no longer a research agency it has been becoming an institution of designing and implementing security solutions for Cyberspace in the EU, the Member States (MSs) and Extra-institutions partners of the EU. With the entry into force of the EC called "Barroso II", two important EU Cyberspace policy instruments began to be developed: The Digital Agenda and the Cyber Security Strategy (CSS). With regard to this work in particular, relates more specifically with the Pillar III of Trust and Security of the Digital Agenda and connections of the UE-CSS and Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). Concerning to this EC, that the European External Action Service (EEAS) by the Treaty of Lisbon, came to have greater responsibilities in defining and implementing actions related to CFSP and the articulation of foreign shares dimension of Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) - formally, the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). There are no security mechanisms for Cyberspace and the Internet to be complete and 100% secure, because this is not dichotomous but rather gradual. It is achieved through various vectors of intervention, namely the Resilience, fight for Cybercrime and Deterrence. If ENISA, has worked in the first, will be necessary also to develop mechanisms in the others. The European Cybercrime Center will fight the second. The European Defence Agency (EDA), among others, may contribute also to this effect, leveraging synergies in cooperation with North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which for several years has been working in that area and they are part of the vast majority MSs of the EU, remaining the rest as partners.
Jůzová, Michaela. "Nejnovější informatizační programy a iniciativy EU." Master's thesis, 2014. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-323569.
Full textBooks on the topic "Agenda Digitale Europea"
Content and Technology European Commission. Directorate General for Communications Networks. Broadband coverage in Europe 2011: Mapping progress towards the coverage objectives of the digital agenda : research report. Luxembourg?]: Publications Office of the European Union, 2012.
Find full textLemstra, Wolter, and William H. Melody. Dynamics of Broadband Markets in Europe: Realizing the 2020 Digital Agenda. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Find full textLemstra, Wolter. Dynamics of Broadband Markets in Europe: Realizing the 2020 Digital Agenda. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Find full textLemstra, Wolter, and William H. Melody. Dynamics of Broadband Markets in Europe: Realizing the 2020 Digital Agenda. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Find full textLemstra, Wolter, and William H. Melody. Dynamics of Broadband Markets in Europe: Realizing the 2020 Digital Agenda. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Find full textLemstra, Wolter, and William H. Melody. Dynamics of Broadband Markets in Europe: Realizing the 2020 Digital Agenda. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Find full textMansell, Robin, and W. Edward Steinmueller. Digital Infrastructures, Economies, and Public Policies. Edited by William H. Dutton. Oxford University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0024.
Full textSchamp, Eike W. Frankfurt. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198817314.003.0005.
Full textVoit, Wolfgang, ed. Werberecht und Absatzförderung/Preisrecht. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783748903499.
Full textWhish, Richard, and David Bailey. Competition Law. 10th ed. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198836322.001.0001.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Agenda Digitale Europea"
Giaretta, David. "European Space Agency TestbedTestbed European Space Agency testbed." In Advanced Digital Preservation, 367–86. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16809-3_20.
Full textHärting, Ralf-Christian, Raphael Kaim, and Frieder Horsch. "Potentials of Digital Business Models for the European Agriculture Sector." In Agents and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications 2020, 27–36. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5764-4_3.
Full textUbachs, George, and Piet Henderikx. "Quality assurance systems for Digital Higher Education in Europe." In Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education, 1–20. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_41-1.
Full textUbachs, George, and Piet Henderikx. "Quality Assurance Systems for Digital Higher Education in Europe." In Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education, 743–62. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_41.
Full textMansell, Robin. "Here Comes the Revolution — the European Digital Agenda." In The Palgrave Handbook of European Media Policy, 202–17. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137032195_12.
Full textBillestrup, Jane, and Jan Stage. "E-government and the Digital Agenda for Europe." In Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design for Diverse Interaction Platforms and Environments, 71–80. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07626-3_7.
Full textGeorgosouli, Andromachi, and Jeremmy Okonjo. "The Algorithmic Future of Insurance Supervision in the EU: A Reality Check." In AIDA Europe Research Series on Insurance Law and Regulation, 217–44. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85817-9_10.
Full textŻur, Agnieszka. "Agency theory and the digital economy." In The Digital Economy and the European Labour Market, 120–32. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003254638-11.
Full textCosta, Cristina, and Mark Murphy. "EU Digital Media Policies and Education: The Challenge of a Digital Agenda for Europe." In Education and Public Policy in the European Union, 149–64. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04230-1_7.
Full textAnagnostopoulou, Despina. "The Digital Agenda of the European Union and the Digital Policies of the USA." In Technology, Society and Sustainability, 49–80. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47164-8_4.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Agenda Digitale Europea"
Mihai, Mihaela, Emilia Titan, Daniela Manea, and Aida Catana. "THE DIGITAL PREMIUM PROGRESS OF AN INCLUSIVE ECONOMY." In eLSE 2018. Carol I National Defence University Publishing House, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.12753/2066-026x-18-242.
Full textTurculet, Alina, and Medianu (mihut) Elvira veronica. "A COMPARATIVE APPROACH: DIGITAL SKILLS IN FORMAL TEACHING AND LEARNING." In eLSE 2015. Carol I National Defence University Publishing House, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.12753/2066-026x-15-144.
Full textOncins, Estella. "YoungArcHers: Nuevas narrativas digitales inclusivas y accesibles sobre patrimonio cultural en el contexto educativo." In Congreso CIMED - II Congreso Internacional de Museos y Estrategias Digitales. Valencia: Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/cimed22.2022.15008.
Full textBolgova, E. V. "Digital Economy Of Innovative Regions: A European Agenda And Development Indicators." In Proceedings of the II International Scientific Conference GCPMED 2019 - "Global Challenges and Prospects of the Modern Economic Development". European Publisher, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.03.159.
Full textCampolargo, M. "Boosting the Digital Agenda for Europe: The contribution of Future Internet." In IEEE EUROCON 2011 - International Conference on Computer as a Tool. IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/eurocon.2011.5929422.
Full textOndrejkova, A. "Digital skills and digital divide in context of the Digital Agenda for Europe focused on Slovakia." In 2015 13th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iceta.2015.7558503.
Full textHoughton, Andrew. "Optical networking: Supporting the digital agenda and future broadband services in Europe." In 2010 36th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication - (ECOC 2010). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ecoc.2010.5621213.
Full textLogofatu, Bogdan. "EMPOWERING EDUCATION WITH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES." In eLSE 2013. Carol I National Defence University Publishing House, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.12753/2066-026x-13-099.
Full textCatana, Aida. "ERDF PROJECTS - STARTING POINT TO IMPROVE ICT SKILLS AND DIGITAL LITERACY - STUDY CASE GROWTH POLE BRASOV." In eLSE 2015. Carol I National Defence University Publishing House, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.12753/2066-026x-15-017.
Full textJohnson, Oliver, Graham Peters, and Glyn Jones. "The EU Digital Agenda: Modelling the opportunity for satellite delivery." In 2012 IEEE First AESS European Conference on Satellite Telecommunications (ESTEL). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/estel.2012.6400189.
Full text