Academic literature on the topic 'Analysis of disagreement'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Analysis of disagreement.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Analysis of disagreement"
Mueller, Mary-Rose, Linda Hill, John Fontanesi, and David Kopald. "Disagreement on Immunization Recommendations: An Analysis of Lay-Clinician Interaction." Journal of Applied Social Science 1, no. 2 (September 2007): 69–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/193672440700100206.
Full textGius, Evelyn, and Janina Jacke. "The Hermeneutic Profit of Annotation: On Preventing and Fostering Disagreement in Literary Analysis." International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 11, no. 2 (October 2017): 233–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/ijhac.2017.0194.
Full textZuolo, Federico, and Giulia Bistagnino. "Disagreement, Peerhood, and Compromise." Social Theory and Practice 44, no. 4 (2018): 593–618. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract201891848.
Full textKnipscheer, Kees, and Anton Bevers. "Older Parents and their Middle-Aged Children: Symmetry or Asymmetry in their Relationship." Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement 4, no. 3 (September 1985): 145–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s071498080001597x.
Full textDovern, Jonas. "A multivariate analysis of forecast disagreement: Confronting models of disagreement with survey data." European Economic Review 80 (November 2015): 16–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.08.009.
Full textEdward Freeman, R., and Mark E. Haskins. "A step-by-step process for transforming contentious disagreements into creative collaboration." Strategy & Leadership 42, no. 3 (May 13, 2014): 15–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/sl-03-2014-0020.
Full textPallitto, Nahuel. "Desacuerdo entre pares epistémicos en el debate naturaleza-cultura." Principia: an international journal of epistemology 22, no. 3 (February 28, 2019): 485–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2018v22n3p485.
Full textDr. D. Rajalakshmi and R. Ramya. "Analysis Of Emotional Intelligence Among Kabaddi And Handball Players." GIS Business 15, no. 1 (December 31, 2019): 405–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.26643/gis.v15i1.18792.
Full textTai, Tsui-o., and Janeen Baxter. "Perceptions of Fairness and Housework Disagreement: A Comparative Analysis." Journal of Family Issues 39, no. 8 (February 19, 2018): 2461–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513x18758346.
Full textFederiuk, Carol S., and Kerth O'Brien. "Sources of Disagreement Among Public and Private Agency Paramedics." Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 10, no. 2 (June 1995): 92–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x00041789.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Analysis of disagreement"
Shen, Lei. "A Discourse Analysis of Chinese Disagreement Management Strategies in Business Negotiation Settings." Diss., Tucson, Arizona : University of Arizona, 2006. http://etd.library.arizona.edu/etd/GetFileServlet?file=file:///data1/pdf/etd/azu%5Fetd%5F1469%5F1%5Fm.pdf&type=application/pdf.
Full textFujimoto, Donna T. "Agreement and Disagreement: Novice Language Learners in Small Group Discussion." Diss., Temple University Libraries, 2012. http://cdm16002.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p245801coll10/id/191866.
Full textEd.D.
While the small group discussion is widely used in language classes, there is little empirical research on its efficacy. This research specifically focuses on novice level language students in order to understand the ways that they express agreement and disagreement in group interaction. This study utilizes the methodological framework of Conversation Analysis conducting a micro-analysis of student turn-taking practices and their embodied behavior. This research uncovered the fact that the novice level language learners utilized resources that are not generally considered when investigating agreement and disagreement. Nonverbal actions such as smiles and gaze shifts accomplished affiliative work mitigating disagreement turns. Facial expression, laughter, and gestures were often relied on to compensate for deficits in grammar and lexicon. A second finding of the research was that the students were able to accomplish significantly more as members of a group than they could as individuals. The multi-person context created a framework enabling members to participate. The students demonstrated a high level of collaboration, joining in word searches, successfully constructing collaborated completions, and frequently offering support to each other through receipt tokens, nods, and smiles. They proved to be each other's best resource. Another finding of the study was the importance of basic patterns of turns in effective group discussion. For example, in order for an argumentative sequence to emerge, a third response was expected: Turn 1, the claim; Turn 2, disagreement; and, Turn 3, defense, counterattack, or concession by the first speaker or a different speaker. For less skillful groups where topics were not well developed, only two-part sequences were utilized, not allowing subsequent and related talk to occur. Finally, this study contributes to research on the acquisition of disagreement strategies. Surprisingly, in expressing disagreement, these novice level language students employed a number of different means to express disagreement that were more often associated with advanced learners. For example, they delayed their disagreement turns, and they utilized accounts, exemplification, and elaboration when disagreeing. Though these students were not always able to express themselves fluently, they were nevertheless quite capable in expressing agreement and disagreement in the target language.
Temple University--Theses
Marra, Anton. "Disagreement in business negotiations : A qualitative study of BELF usage in face-to-face business negotiations." Thesis, Stockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen, 2016. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-133218.
Full textMeyer, Roman. "Understanding Options Mispricing An Empirical Analysis of Volatility Risk Premia and Earnings Disagreement as Priced Risk Factors /." St. Gallen, 2008. http://www.biblio.unisg.ch/org/biblio/edoc.nsf/wwwDisplayIdentifier/02601144002/$FILE/02601144002.pdf.
Full textBastos, Marcelo Almeida. "Índices de vegetação para o mapeamento de lavouras de arroz irrigado na bacia do Rio Gravataí no estado do Rio Grande do Sul." reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/109735.
Full textThe objective of this work was to evaluate two vegetation indexes, NDVI and NDWI, for mapping paddy rice from temporal classification algorithms. The study area is located in the inner coastal plain of Rio Grande do Sul, consisting of crops of paddy rice in the irrigation perimeter of settlement Viamão, agricultural region in the basin of rio Gravataí. Digital images were obtained from three sensors, TM (satellite Landsat- 5), LISS-III (satellite IRS-P6) and OLI (satellite Landsat-8) for the period from 1 July 2008 and June 30, 2014, corresponding to six agricultural harvests. The two indices were calculated for each scene after the geometric registration of images with the official cartographic base, allowing the correlation mapping from field reference images. The patterns of temporal variation of the two indices of vegetation for six agricultural crops were analyzed to provide the parameters used in the choice of thresholds for temporal classification algorithms. The algorithms generated thematic maps of land use with two classes each: rice and no rice. Subsequently, the result of the mapping for three successive agricultural harvests (2009/10, 2010/11 and 2011/12) were compared with the reference and carried discordance. The resulting of accuracy assessment were in 77%, 63% and 77% of overall accuracy, respectively for each crop considering the NDVI algorithm, and 88%; 59% and 76%, respectively for the NDWI algorithm. The analysis of discordance showed that most of the error of the two algorithms was due to the quantity of disagreement, with little or no disagreement on allocation of disagreement, and that the methodology employed can be used to assist in mapping paddy rice in study area.
Forsberg, Lisa. "Spelar de någon roll? : En kvalitativ studie om ansiktsarbete inom debattformatet." Thesis, Södertörns högskola, Svenska, 2017. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-34533.
Full textNykodým, Daniel. "Řízení neshod v podniku stavební výroby." Master's thesis, Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta stavební, 2016. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-240397.
Full textNovotný, Karel. "Analýza neshod výkovků." Master's thesis, Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta strojního inženýrství, 2008. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-228194.
Full textHenning, Susanne. "La construcción de la imagen social en dos pares adyacentes: Opinión-acuerdo/desacuerdo y ofrecimiento-aceptación/rechazo : Un estudio de la conversación familiar sueca y española." Doctoral thesis, Stockholms universitet, Romanska och klassiska institutionen, 2015. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-119490.
Full textParise, Silmara Souza. "A fala-em-interação e o desacordo sob a perspectiva da linguística sistêmico-funcional." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2015. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/13739.
Full textCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
The objective of this research is the examination of disagreement in an informal casual talk-in-interaction between a man and a woman to verify the lexicogrammatical choices that highlight the occurrence of disagreements, and the circumstances surrounding these events. The study of the act of disagreeing in daily conversation has been associated to both, Conversation Analysis studies, based on the notion of preference, and to the concept of model of Politeness. There are notable points of convergence in the preference setting and politeness. More specifically, both see disagreement as socially disruptive and, thus, considered as the second dispreferred part or face-threatening-acts. Both approaches emphasize the fact that disagreements should be mitigated or postponed: between, within and across speech turns. Thus, conversational disagreements tend to be temporarily postponed and structurally complex and generally preceded by partial agreements, hesitations, requests for clarification, repetitions of the question, among others. In fact, the degree and the type of strategy used to mitigate face-threatening-acts or dispreferred acts cannot be postulated a priori, but must be supported by empirical data analysis, which are situationally and contextually sensitive of the event of speech in which the act occurs. The critical nature of the analysis carried out is supported by the Systemic Functional Linguistics, which allows the relationship between the microstructure of lexicogrammatical choices with the macrostructure of disagreement and their implications. Following the trend of this research area trend, I adopt an eclectic theoretical base, extracting insights of different approaches, but with special focus on Conversation Analysis, Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Linguistics. This research aims to answer the following questions: (a) How are disagreement and mitigation characterized linguistically? (b) Which roles do causality, concession and adversativity perform in this process? (c) What is the function of Appraisal and Modality in relation to these issues?
O objetivo desta pesquisa é o exame do desacordo em um diálogo informal entre um homem e uma mulher para verificar as escolhas léxico-gramaticais que marcam a ocorrência de desacordos, bem como as circunstâncias que cercam essas ocorrências. O estudo do ato de discordar na conversa diária tem sido associado de um lado ao trabalho de Análise da Conversa, com base na noção de preferência, e, de outro lado, ao conceito de face no modelo de polidez. Há notáveis pontos de convergência na definição de preferência e de polidez. Mais especificamente, ambas veem o desacordo como socialmente disruptivo, sendo assim, considerado como segunda parte despreferida ou atos-ameaçadores-de-face. Ambas as abordagens enfatizam o fato de que os desacordos devem ser mitigados ou adiados: entre, dentro e através de turnos. Assim, os desacordos conversacionais tendem a ser temporariamente postergados e estruturalmente complexos e, em geral, prefaciados por acordos parciais, hesitações, pedidos de esclarecimento, repetição da pergunta, entre outros. Na realidade, o grau e o tipo de estratégia usados para mitigar as ameaças-de-face ou os atos despreferidos não podem ser postulados a priori, mas precisam ser apoiados em análises de dados empíricos, sensíveis ao contexto tanto situacional quanto cultural - do evento da fala em que o ato ocorre. A análise de cunho crítico tem o apoio da Linguística Sistêmico-Funcional, que permite fazer a relação entre a microestrutura das escolhas léxico-gramaticais com a macroestrutura do desacordo e suas implicações. Seguindo tendência dessa área de pesquisa, adoto uma base teórica eclética, extraindo as intravisões de diferentes abordagens, mas com referência especial para a Análise da Conversa, a Linguística Sistêmico-Funcional e a Linguística Crítica. A pesquisa deve responder às seguintes perguntas: (a) Como se caracteriza linguisticamente o desacordo ou a sua mitigação? (b) Que papéis exercem, nesse processo, a causalidade, a concessividade e a adversatividade? (c) Qual é a função da Avaliatividade e da Modalidade em relação a essas questões?
Books on the topic "Analysis of disagreement"
Transforming violent conflict: Radical disagreement, dialogue and survival. London: Routledge, 2010.
Find full textAbdullah, Walid Jumblatt. Islam in a Secular State. NL Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/9789463724012.
Full textBadea, Andreea, Bruno Boute, Marco Cavarzere, and Steven Broecke, eds. Making Truth in Early Modern Catholicism. NL Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/9789463720526.
Full textVogt, Katja Maria. Disagreement, Value, Measure. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190692476.003.0003.
Full textMori, Junko. Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese: Connective Expressions and Turn Construction (Studies in Discourse and Grammar). John Benjamins Publishing Co, 1999.
Find full textCookson, Richard, Susan Griffin, Ole F. Norheim, and Anthony J. Culyer, eds. Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198838197.001.0001.
Full textRolfe, Meredith, and Stephanie Chan. Voting and Political Participation. Edited by Jennifer Nicoll Victor, Alexander H. Montgomery, and Mark Lubell. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190228217.013.15.
Full textGratier, Maya, Rebecca Evans, and Ksenija Stevanovic. Negotiations. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199355914.003.0014.
Full textList, Christian, and Laura Valentini. The Methodology of Political Theory. Edited by Herman Cappelen, Tamar Szabó Gendler, and John Hawthorne. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668779.013.10.
Full textDavis, Michael. Whistleblowing. Edited by Hugh LaFollette. Oxford University Press, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199284238.003.0022.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Analysis of disagreement"
Lougheed, Kirk. "An Analysis of Ideal Cases of Disagreement." In Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 19–35. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34503-7_2.
Full textKomatani, Kazunori, Shogo Okada, Haruto Nishimoto, Masahiro Araki, and Mikio Nakano. "Multimodal Dialogue Data Collection and Analysis of Annotation Disagreement." In Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 201–13. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9323-9_17.
Full textKobayakawa, Maiko, and Tae Umino. "Mitigation strategies in expressions of disagreement adopted by intermediate learners of Japanese." In Corpus Analysis and Variation in Linguistics, 379–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/tufs.1.22kob.
Full textRiaz, Farhad Muhammad, Nasir Mahmood Minhas, Sarfraz Bibi, and Waqas Ahmed. "Classification of Social Media Users Based on Disagreement and Stance Analysis." In Communications in Computer and Information Science, 309–21. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5232-8_27.
Full textWiderquist, Karl. "Why UBI Experiments Cannot Resolve Much of the Public Disagreement About UBI." In A Critical Analysis of Basic Income Experiments for Researchers, Policymakers, and Citizens, 87–91. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03849-6_11.
Full textHashimoto, Kengo. "Subcriticality." In Accelerator-Driven System at Kyoto University Critical Assembly, 13–49. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0344-0_2.
Full textDove, Graham, Sille Julie J. Abildgaard, Michael Mose Biskjaer, Nicolai Brodersen Hansen, and Bo T. Christensen Halskov. "Psychological Factors Surrounding Disagreement in Multicultural Design Team Meetings." In Analysing Design Thinking: Studies of Cross-Cultural Co-Creation, 229–48. Leiden,The Netherlands : CRC Press/Balkema, [2017]: CRC Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315208169-13.
Full textPaletz, Susannah B. F., Arlouwe Sumer, and Ella Miron-Spektor. "Psychological Factors Surrounding Disagreement in Multicultural Design Team Meetings." In Analysing Design Thinking: Studies of Cross-Cultural Co-Creation, 41–58. Leiden,The Netherlands : CRC Press/Balkema, [2017]: CRC Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315208169-3.
Full textRamsbotham, Oliver. "Taking Radical Disagreement Seriously: Filling the Discourse Analytic Gap in the Study of Intractable Asymmetric Conflicts." In Discourse and Conflict, 19–50. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76485-2_2.
Full textKirchhelle, Claas. "Slippery FACTs: The Rise of a “mandated” Animal Welfare Science." In Palgrave Studies in the History of Social Movements, 175–202. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62792-8_10.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Analysis of disagreement"
Wang, Yinghui. "Convergence and disagreement analysis of opinion dynamics." In 2014 33rd Chinese Control Conference (CCC). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/chicc.2014.6897099.
Full textWEST, CAROLINE. "PERSONAL IDENTITY, CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS AND NO-FAULT DISAGREEMENT." In Proceedings of the 5th Metaphysics of Science Workshop. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814299053_0007.
Full textFathollahnejad, Negin, Emilia Villani, Risat Pathan, Raul Barbosa, and Johan Karlsson. "On Probabilistic Analysis of Disagreement in Synchronous Consensus Protocols." In 2014 Tenth European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/edcc.2014.26.
Full textMyler, Harley R. "Characterization of disagreement in multiplatform and multisensor fusion analysis." In AeroSense 2000, edited by Ivan Kadar. SPIE, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.395074.
Full textWang, Lu, and Claire Cardie. "Improving Agreement and Disagreement Identification in Online Discussions with A Socially-Tuned Sentiment Lexicon." In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/v1/w14-2617.
Full textDas, Debopam, Manfred Stede, and Maite Taboada. "The Good, the Bad, and the Disagreement: Complex ground truth in rhetorical structure analysis." In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Recent Advances in RST and Related Formalisms. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/w17-3602.
Full textGong, Wen-Ru, Hong-Yi Li, and Di Zhao. "An Denoising Method Based on Analysis K-SVD and Disagreement Segment and Its Application on EMI Signal." In 3rd International Conference on Wireless Communication and Sensor Networks (WCSN 2016). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icwcsn-16.2017.75.
Full textNakajima, Norihiro, Akemi Nishida, Yoshiaki Kawakami, Tatsuo Okada, Osamu Tsuruta, Kazuhiro Sawa, and Kazuhiko Iigaki. "Structural Analysis for Assembly by Integrating Parts." In 2014 22nd International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icone22-30251.
Full textİncekara, Ahmet, and Betül Mutlugün. "Analysis of Income Distribution and Economic Growth Relation in Process of Neoliberal Economic Policies in Turkey." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c07.01499.
Full textKa¨hko¨nen, Jukka, and Pentti Varpasuo. "Using Microplane Material Model for Concrete in Soft Missile Impact Analysis." In 18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. ASMEDC, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icone18-29142.
Full textReports on the topic "Analysis of disagreement"
Donti, Olyvia, Andreas Konrad, Ioli Panidi, Petros Dinas, and Gregory Bogdanis. Is there a window of opportunity for flexibility development in youth? A systematic review with meta-analysis. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, September 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2021.9.0032.
Full text