Books on the topic 'Analysis of item difficulty'

Nissan, Susan. An analysis of factors affecting the difficulty of dialogue items in TOEFL listening comprehension. Princeton, N.J: Educational Testing Service, 1996.

Boldt, Robert F. Using a neural net to predict item difficulty. Princeton, N.J: Educational Testing Service, 1996.

Skurnik, Larry Seymour. Examination and item analysis manual. Nottingham: University of Nottingham, School of Education, 1987.

Wilson, Douglas T. TESTFACT: Test scoring, item statistics, and item factor analysis. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, 1991.

Ordinal item response theory: Mokken scale analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc, 2011.

van Schuur, Wijbrandt. Ordinal Item Response Theory: Mokken Scale Analysis. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452230641.

Ramadge, John D. Task learning difficulty: Interrelationships among aptitude-specific benchmarked rating scales. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, 1987.

F, George Joey, Valacich Joseph S. 1959-, and Miller Lisa, eds. Test item file: Modern systems analysis and design. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall, 2002.

Thissen, David. Multilog user's guide: Multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory. 6th ed. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, 1991.

Kostin, Irene. Exploring item characteristics that are related to the difficulty of TOEFL dialogue items. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 2004.

Spray, Judith A. Effects of item difficulty heterogeneity on the estimation of true-score and classification consistency. Iowa City, Iowa: American College Testing Program, 1988.

Showunmi, Victoria. Why British Black women have difficulty finding employment: A sociological analysis. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 2012.

Farmer, William L. Latent trait theory analysis of changes in item response anchors. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aviation Medicine, 2001.

Baker, Rosemary. Classical test theory and item response theory in test analysis. Lancaster: Lancaster University, Centre for Research in Language Education, 1997.

Fowler, Leah C. A curriculum of difficulty: Narrative research in education and the practice of teaching. New York: Peter Lang, 2006.

Freedle, Roy O. The prediction of TOEFL listening comprehension item difficulty for minitalk passages: Implications for construct validity. Princeton, N.J: Educational Testing Service, 1996.

Garcia, Sharon K. Benchmark learning difficulty technology: Feasibility of operational implementation. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, 1985.

Freedle, Roy O. The prediction of TOEFL reading comprehension item difficulty for expository prose passages for three item types--main idea, inference, and supporting idea items. Princeton, N.J: Educational Testing Service, 1993.

Belov, Dmitry. A stochastic search for test assembly, item pool analysis, and design. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council, 2006.

Skinner, Jacobina. Air Force Officer Qualifying Test (AFOQT): Item and factor analysis of Form O. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, 1987.

Lin, Chuan-Ju. Effects of item-selection criteria on classification testing with the sequential probability ratio test. Iowa City, Iowa: ACT, Inc., 2000.

Lin, Chuan-Ju. Effects of item-selection criteria on classification testing with the sequential probability ratio test. Iowa City, Iowa: ACT, Inc., 2000.

Lin, Chuan-Ju. Effects of item-selection criteria on classification testing with the sequential probability ratio test. Iowa City, Iowa: ACT, Inc., 2000.

Woodruff, David J. Linear models for item scores: Reliability, covariance structure, and psychometric inference. Iowa City, Iowa: American College Testing Program, 1993.

Rosenbach, Margo L. Re-analysis of item nonresponse rates in the 1998 PPCIS: A technical memorandum : final report. Waltham, Mass: Health Policy Research Consortium, Heller Graduate School, Brandeis University, 1992.

Cristante, Francesca. Item analysis: An approach using log-linear models for the study of cross-classified tables. Bologna: Pàtron editore, 1987.

Champlain, Andre F. De. An overview of nonlinear factor analysis and its relationship to item response theory / Andre ́F. De Champlain. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council, 1999.

Schulz, E. Matthew. Grade equivalent and IRT representations of growth. Iowa City, Iowa: ACT, Inc., 1997.

Paton, Rob. Analysis of the experiences of and problems encountered by worker take-overs of companies in difficulty or bankrupt: Main report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1987.

Lee, Revere, and Render Barry, eds. Test item file, Quantitative analysis for management, ninth edition, Barry Render, Ralph M. Stair Jr., Michael E. Hanna. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006.

Park, Hwa Jin. A marginal analysis for minimizing shortage in a multi-item inventory system with a constraint for a single period. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School, 1988.

Paton, Rob. Programme for research and actions on the development of the labour market: Analysis of the experiences of and problems encountered by worker take-overs of companies in difficulty or bankrupt : main report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1987.

San Francisco (Calif.). Board of Supervisors. Budget Analyst. Analysis of eighth draft of a proposed charter amendment that would establish a human resources department (7/19/93) Board calendar item 10, File 248-93-1) and sixth draft of a proposed charter amendment that would transfer the function of the municipal railway (MUNI) from the Public Utilities Commission to a new department of transportation (7/19/93 Board calendar item 11, File 250-93-1). San Francisco, CA: Budget Analyst, 1993.

Lorensen, Leonard. Illustrations of management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations: A survey of the application of item 303 of Regulation S-K and section 501 of the Codification of financial reporting policies of the Securities and Exchange Commission, as modified by Financial reporting release no. 36, isssued May 18, 1989. New York, N.Y: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 1991.

I, Arnolʹd V. Experimental mathematics. Berkeley, California: MSRI Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, 2015.

I, Chase Clinton, ed. Developing and using tests effectively: A guide for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1992.

Wilson, Douglas T. Testfact: Test scoring, item statistics, and item factor analysis. SSI, Scientific Software International, 1998.

Anchor-based methods for judgmentally estimating item difficulty parameters. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council, 2003.

K, Hambleton Ronald, and Law School Admission Council, eds. Anchor-based methods for judgmentally estimating item difficulty parameters. Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council, 2003.

Asc's Item and Test Analysis Package. CRC, 1996.

Melumad, Nahum D., and Doron Nissim. Line-Item Analysis of Earnings Quality. Now Publishers, 2009.

Asc's Item and Test Analysis Package. CRC, 1996.

Iteman(tm) 3.50: Item Analysis Program. CRC, 1996.

Asc's Item and Test Analysis Package. CRC, 1996.

Iteman(tm) 3.50: Item Analysis Program. CRC, 1996.

Gridley, Mark C. Jazz Styles History and Analysis (Test Item File). 5th ed. Prentice Hall, 1994.

Politoske, Daniel T. Instructor's manual and test item file: Music. 4th ed. Prentice-Hall, 1988.

Singh, Minawatie Devi. Investigating the prediction of item difficulty and bias by gender in reading literacy. 2005.

Yoon, Dave Tae Shik. Empirical analysis of local search algorithms and problem difficulty in satisfiability. 2006.

Mark, Pomplun, ed. An analysis of English composition test essay prompts for differential difficulty. New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 1992.