To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Animal farm (Orwell, George).
Journal articles on the topic 'Animal farm (Orwell, George)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Animal farm (Orwell, George).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Sushil Ghimire. "Animal Imagery in George Orwell's novel “Animal Farm”." Journal of Balkumari College 10, no. 1 (January 5, 2022): 67–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jbkc.v10i1.42105.
Full textAbstract:
The present paper is a literary stylistic study that illustrates in George Orwell's novel Animal Farm the imagery, the allegorical meaning, linguistic exploitation or manipulation of words. One of the most traditional features of the Animal Farm and an integral part of its imagery is Orwell 's sophisticated sensitivity to political abuse of language Inwardly, this novel is an allegory that relates to power struggle, usurpation, coercion, manipulation, hypocrisy, oppression, political racket and fear of the ruling classes in any shape they may exist (human or animal). It seems to be a simple tale of animals. However severe the subject is, through his vivid imagery and artful use of literary instruments, Orwell has made it imaginative and humorous. With its clear, deceptively simple, but creatively honed prose style and expressive language, the novel is a source of great aesthetic and intellectual pleasure and political insight.
2
Ali, Inst Suaad Hussein. "The Role of Propaganda in George Orwell's Animal Farm." Alustath Journal for Human and Social Sciences 60, no. 2 (July 9, 2021): 27–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.36473/ujhss.v60i2.1605.
Full textAbstract:
Animal Farm is a novel of pure propaganda. Orwell himself admits that he writes this novel in order to be a propaganda against the 'Soviet's myth', to expose Stalin's propaganda and Stalin's Communism. As propagandist, Orwell shows his ideas and opinions towards the dictatorial regimes. This study presents the outstanding role of different types and techniques of propaganda used in the novel by the characters, and how these techniques' persuasion influences are various from one another. The paper also traces the propagandists' ways and methods to make use of people's emotions by appealing to their profound fears and great dreams to befool and deceive them. Orwell gives the most devastating image of a propagandist through the character of Squealer who is crushingly effective to convince the animals and make them believe in everything he says. The paper also sheds light on Orwell's actual efforts to warn people from the tactics used by political regimes, and his attempt to show the effects of illiteracy and lack of education in supporting propagandists' purposes for exploiting people and make them victims of an evil propaganda.
3
Muradian, Gaiane. "Imagery in Action: G. Orwell’s “Animal Farm”." Armenian Folia Anglistika 12, no. 1 (15) (April 15, 2016): 17–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.46991/afa/2016.12.1.017.
Full textAbstract:
The present paper is a literary stylistic analysis that highlights the imagery, the allegorical significance, linguistic manipulation or abuse of language in the novel Animal Farm by George Orwell. Orwell’s sophisticated exposure of political abuse of language is one of the most typical characteristics of Animal Farm and an indispensable part of his imagery. Seemingly a plain story of animals, inwardly this novel is an allegory that refers to power struggle, usurpation, intimidation, exploitation, hypocrisy, corruption, political racket and terror of the ruling classes in whatever form they may appear (human or animal). However serious the theme is, Orwell has made it fictitious and amusing through his vivid imagery and artful use of literary devices. With its clear, deceptively simple, but creatively honed prose style and expressive language, the novel is a source of great aesthetic and intellectual pleasure and political insight.
4
Pardy, Bruce. "Animal Farm Revisited: An Environment Allegory." Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 30, no. 1 (June 1, 1999): 135. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v30i1.6016.
Full textAbstract:
In 1945, George Orwell wrote Animal Farm, a story about barnyard animals who overthrow their tyrannical human master but end up creating an equally oppressive hierarchy. "All animals are equal", reads the seminal line in the book, "but some animals are more equal than others". Animal Farm was an allegory about the Soviet Union under Stalin, although Orwell intended it to have wider application also. "It is" wrote Orwell in the blurb for the first edition, "the history of a revolution that went wrong – and of the excellent excuses that were forthcoming at every step for the perversion of the original doctrine". In "Animal Farm Revisited" Orwell's template has been applied to the environmental question. In a multitude of countries, including New Zealand, and in the international sphere, environmental law suffers from a plethora of good intentions and a paucity of concrete principles. Indeed, the history of environmental protection could be described as the story of an intention gone astray – and of the excellent explanations that have been forthcoming for the qualification of its purpose. "Animal Farm Revisited" is a kind of environmental Rorschach test: at what moment do actions become environmentally inappropriate? Many answers are possible. The story is not specifically about the Resource Management Act 1991, but its themes are relevant to the Act and its interpretation.
5
Fajrina, Dian. "Character Metaphors in George Orwell’s Animal Farm." Studies in English Language and Education 3, no. 1 (March 13, 2016): 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.24815/siele.v3i1.3391.
Full textAbstract:
Animal Farm was written by George Orwell in 1944 to criticize the Soviet Union leaders and their administration represented by animal characters. The objective of this study was to find out the resemblances between the character of Soviet Union leaders at the time the novel was written and those depicted in the novel. In analysing the objective of this study, content analysis was used. The data are the dialogues and other information in the novel concerning the metaphors of characters between the Soviet Union leaders of the 20th century and those in Animal Farm. The writer finds out that Jones metaphors Nicholas II, the last Tsar of Russian Monarchy, Old Major with his speech metaphors Karl Marx with his Communist Manifesto, Napoleon as Stalin, Snowball as Trotsky, Squealer as Pravda, the Russian Newspaper at that time, Frederick as German and Boxer as the type of gullibility proletariat. Indeed, George Orwell’s timeless work reminds us that totalitarianism could be harmful to one society.
6
Antonijevic, Pavle. "ANALIZA ORVELOVIH POGLEDA NA IDEJE SOCIJALIZMA U ŽIVOTINjSKOJ FARMI I 1984." Lipar 22, no. 74 (2021): 67–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/lipar74.067a.
Full textAbstract:
This paper examines the last two literary works of George Orwell with the aim to analyze his political beliefs. Although these works have remained characterized primarily as critiques of totalitarianism and the Stalinist version of socialism, the pur- pose of this study is to show Orwell’s attitude towards the ideas of socialism in theory with parallel comparison of Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four. Furthermore, in order to consider this problem more comprehensively, it was necessary to research the author’s attitude towards capitalism and liberalism. The article is divided into two main sections. The first section gives a brief overview of Orwell’s political evolution from the second to the fourth decades of 20th century. The second section examines the content of the books which are the subject of research. The article proves that Orwell remained committed to the ideas of democratic socialism in both of his liter- ary works. Portrayal of Orwell as an anti-socialist is unjustified and was formed due to the Cold War context in the West. Additionally, the article concludes that Orwell’s Animal Farm and 1984 contain a critique of capitalism and Western imperialism, which is more pronounced in Animal Farm as compared to 1984.
7
McBeath, Neil. "Why Do We Still Read George Orwell?" Journal of Arts and Social Sciences [JASS] 5, no. 2 (June 1, 2014): 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jass.vol5iss2pp15-27.
Full textAbstract:
This paper approaches Orwell’s writing from the perspective of the 21st century and asks whether Animal Farm, his satirical fable of the USSR, and the dystopian vision of Nineteen Eighty-Four remain relevant. It dismisses the suggestion that these last two novels can be regarded as the natural culmination of Orwell’s earlier work, principally by examining these other writings demonstrates that there is no natural trajectory. The paper also refers to key dates in Orwell’s life and comments on his career at those particular moments. Orwell remains relevant, the paper concludes, because the forces of oppression he so vehemently opposed remain potent today. The residue of Stalinism survives in some countries, while others have become tyrannies where personality cults can flourish. Political doublethink still exists. The very fact that the adjective “Orwellian” remains current in English, and that his metaphors have entered mainstream discourse, are further indications that his work remains important. Far from being a writer of the 1930s, Orwell has been able to transcend both distance and time.
8
Risdianto, Faizal, Noor Malihah, and Agung Guritno. "The problem of Presupposition in George Orwell’s Novella Animal Farm." Journal of Pragmatics Research 1, no. 1 (February 6, 2019): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v1i1.1-12.
Full textAbstract:
This research attempts to investigate the pragmatics presupposition in George Orwell’s Novella Animal Farm. Specifically, it tries to identify and classify the presupposition used in conversation in Orwell’s novella. The identification is based on the presupposition triggers and classification based on six type of presupposition. The research also attempts to analyze the function in the use of presupposition in conversation. The data in this research are in form of utterances containing presupposition. Based on the classification of six presupposition types according to Yule's theory (1996), 180 presuppositions are found: 69 (38,3%) existential triggered by definite description and possessive construction, 35 (19,4%) lexical triggered by change of state verb; implicative predicate; iterative, 53 (29,4%) structural triggered by WH-question, 4 (2,2%) factive triggered by factive verb/predicate aware glad and 19 (10,6%) non-factive triggered by the verb dream imagine. Based on the six language function by Jakobson (1960), there are 5 functions of presupposition in the novella which are, 57 (47, 9%) referential, 33(27,7%) emotive, 25(21,1%) conative, 3(2,5%) poetic and 1 (0,8%) phatic. In this research, the practice of referential function in applying presupposition is considered as the most frequent.Keywords: Presupposition, presupposition triggers, Novella, George Orwell
9
Charan, Christina. "The Thematic and Symbolic Potluck at the Animal Farm." Think India 22, no. 3 (September 26, 2019): 98–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.26643/think-india.v22i3.8081.
Full textAbstract:
Animal farm by George Orwell published in 1945 seems to be a plainly written tale at a cursory glance but it with an in depth study we could fathom the scope of it. Animal farm is rich at diverse flavours all well mixed to give the perfect taste for sensibilities and intellect. Richness of literary techniques, multidimensional narratives, characters and symbolic delicacies is offered by animal farm. The literary richness is exhibited in a simple allegorical form which represents perfect craftsmanship. This paper will discuss the various vital aspects of the novel including its multidimensional themes, felicitous characters, diverse narratives and precise symbols along with the well established techniques of social settlements.
George Orwell the writer had an intimate experience of the brutal dealings during World War II, as he corresponded for BBC. He was instigated by the communism at USSR and his desire to bring to light the factual conditions and real reasons which gave birth to the novella Animal Farm. The variety of themes strikes the correct chord of thought. The novella is written in a form of political allegory based on the political and social fervour; where the characters replicate the leaders, common populace, bureaucrats and enterprise-grade at USSR during and after the Russian revolution of 1917.
10
Sami Ullah Khan, Dr. Abdus Samad, and Amar Yasir. "Misanthropic Attitude of George Orwell’s Animal Farm: from Revolution to Rehabilitation." Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review (RJSSER) 2, no. 1 (March 7, 2021): 168–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol2-iss1-2021(168-173).
Full textAbstract:
This paper aims to focus on finding and highlighting the misanthropic aspects and their effects on the characters in the novel Animal Farm by George Orwell. The misanthropic perspectives in the novel have been premeditated deeply. Misanthropy has been implemented on the characters. The characters like, Old Major, Napoleon, Squealer, and others have been studied to manifest the misanthropic attitudes in it. Old major is the father of misanthropy in the novel Animal Farm and gives the idea of rehabilitation in the animals' lives and Napoleon accomplishes it. The disgusting behavior of the animals leads to revolution. Misanthropy affects humans' lives and they become homeless. The findings of the paper are that the animals possess disgusting behavior against humans. The paper concludes that the whole novel is replete with misanthropy and it is the very aspect that has been probed by this article. Eventually, misanthropy proves to be a nightmarish dream for animals of the Animal Farm and a complete disillusionment they expect from the revolution.
11
De Campos, Marcia Cristina Maeno. "Animals." Diacrítica 33, no. 3 (December 9, 2020): 72–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.21814/diacritica.153.
Full textAbstract:
Em 1944, o escritor britânico George Orwell publicou a “nouvella” Animal Farm, traduzida em português como A Revolução dos Bichos. Através de signos fortes, como os personagens animais, dentre os quais os porcos ao longo da obra transmutam-se em humanos, e os artefatos humanos, este artigo analisa o poder destes signos nos planos narrativo e de crítica moral-filosófica da obra assim como os do disco lançado trinta anos depois pela banda de rock progressivo inglesa Pink Floyd: Animals.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Animals, Animal Farm, signos, ideologia, releitura, práxis.
12
Hazhar Ramadhan Ahmed, Shabanb, and Othman Mohammed. "Literary Parody of Russian Communism Harmonizing to George Orwell's Two Novels "Animal Farm" and "Nineteen Eighty Four"." International Journal of Language and Literary Studies 3, no. 2 (June 29, 2021): 216–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v3i2.554.
Full textAbstract:
This Paper concerns within one of the foremost critical viewpoints in literature, where the metaphorical and mocking centrality of ‘Animal Farm’ and ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four' by George Orwell is highlighted, Through 'Animal Farm' and 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' Orwell by implication assaults Russian communism, Orwell combines political reason with a creative one to voice his critical conviction. Orwell utilized parody to grant more impact and understanding of his two books. Parody in Literature constitutes one of the viable literary strategies writers utilize in their stories to assault an individual, a thought, or behaviour that they think awful or silly. An essayist in parody employments an anecdotal character, which stands for genuine individuals to uncover and condemn their debasement, the analyst takes after the descriptive-analytic strategy. Animal Farm is ostensibly an animal story, but deep down it is a moral story, a parody around the Russian Revolution of 1917 with wrong qualities of course battle.
To a few degrees, Nineteen Eighty-Four moreover centres on the concepts of the free venture and person flexibility, which don't really exist. There as it were remains a world of scorn. Segregation, and fear as superpowers. Eurasia and East Asia are two superpowers and Oceania, the third one, is continuously at war with one of them. By using political parody within the two books, the writer makes a consul and curiously air that influences progressing the plot in arrange to provide a clear understanding and improving its structure. In arrange to connect the investigate questions and the discoveries, a nitty-gritty clarification on the concept of the parody has been displayed as a curiously literary method; something else, peruses would not discover a relationship between the two works. At long last, Orwell actually succeeds in encoding his knead within the shape of a parody and hence peruses associated with him.
13
Mustafa, Goran Omar. "The Nature of Revolution on Animal Farm." k@ta 21, no. 1 (June 21, 2019): 17–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.9744/kata.21.1.17-23.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT
Revolution as a phenomenon is considered as a way to a complete change of a situation or system of government to a better one. Dose revolution really is the right way to fulfil our dreams and have a better way of life? Or simply it is just changing the face of rulers or the name of the governments. Many writers and novelists wrote about this issue. George Orwell which is considered as apolitical writer, is one of them. He wrote many novels. Animal Farm, as one of them, is an allegorical story of some animals in a farm. They begin a revolution against the humans with the dream of getting rid of Man as the root cause of their problems, and to be rich and free. They have a short period of honeymoon revolution, but then their dream of building a utopian farm crashes by the pigs and would find themselves in dystopia. This paper aims to study the nature of revolution generally in the shed light of human history. Then to explore how this phenomenon is treated by Orwell in his novel. Can we consider revolution as a right way to have a complete change in the political system and thinking of people? The researchers try to illuminate and find answer for those questions by providing examples from the story of Animal Farm.
14
Zhang, Yueyang. "The Influence of Defamiliarization on Literary Works — A Case Study of George Orwell's Animal Farm." Journal of Higher Education Research 3, no. 3 (July 2, 2022): 261. http://dx.doi.org/10.32629/jher.v3i3.872.
Full textAbstract:
George Orwell is a master of the application of defamiliarization techniques. His work 1984 is regarded as a model of the application of defamiliarization technique. The author takes his another work, Animal Farm, as an example to explore the realization and effects of defamiliarization on literary works. This article according to the concept of defamiliarization put forward by Viktor Shklovsky, classifies the use of defamiliarization in Animal Farm. Combined with examples from Animal Farm to analyze the effect and influence of using defamiliarization, the essay aims at showing defamiliarization can be applied to the subject, narrative perspective, characters, language and almost every aspect of the work to provide creative aesthetic art for people.
15
Xhinaku, Ervin, and Olsa Pema. "The Antitotalitarian Allegories of George Orwell and Ismail Kadare – A Comparative Analysis of the Forms of their Expression." European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research 3, no. 1 (April 30, 2015): 163. http://dx.doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v3i1.p163-170.
Full textAbstract:
The object of this study is the analytical comparison between the antitotalitarian allegories of George Orwell and Ismail Kadare, with a special focus on the similarities and differences in the forms of their expression. With this overall aim in view, from the rich and varied oeuvre of Kadare we have selected “The Palace of Dreams” and “The Pyramid”, as two of his most representative antitotalitarian novels written in a totalitarian environment, and placed them alongside the antitotalitarian classics of Orwell – “Animal Farm” and “1984”. As the many stylistic and structural differences between these novels tend to fall into a consistent pattern, in order to make sense of them, we have directed our attention beyond the texts themselves into matters related to the context in which they were conceived, the history of their publication and the type of readership to which they were primarily addressed. Our critical examination shows that the novels of Kadare tend to be more structurally complex than those of Orwell, while the exploration of their deep allegorical meaning is follows a less straightforward route than the allegorical probing of “Animal Farm” and “1984”. This difference, far from being a blunt literary fact, which should be taken simply for what it is without any attempt at explanation, follows very logically from the great gap that separates the world of Orwell from the closely monitored totalitarian environment in which Kadare’s novels were written and published.
16
Ahmad, Sajad, and Dr Huma Yaquub. "Beyond the Political Allegory: A Study of George Orwell’s Animal Farm as an Ecofeminist Text." International Journal of Agriculture and Animal Production, no. 23 (May 29, 2022): 33–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.55529/ijaap.23.33.38.
Full textAbstract:
Animal Farm has variously been analysed as a farce, a fable, a political allegory and a dystopian allegorical novella. However, this study suspends the allegorical interpretations and focuses on the primary or literal meaning of the text to show how Orwell in Animal Farm highlights animal oppression. Suspension of the allegorical interpretations allows the reader to infer that the novella also brings animal abuse to the limelight besides serving as a scathing satire on Stalinism. The animal characters which represent the gullible and oppressed masses of Russia under the dictatorship of Joseph Stalin and Trotsky also narrate the painful stories of different varieties of domestic animals. Ecofeminism is built on the notion that every kind of oppression and exploitation is in one way or the other way interconnected. Therefore, the leading ecofeminist theorists like Greta Gaard, Lori Green and Devona Harvey treat speciesism or animal liberation theory as a branch of ecofeminism by merging the case of animals with ecofeminist discourse. The study draws upon the ideas of leading ecofeminists and particularly animal rights theorists like Peter Singer and Tom Regan to bring animal abuse to the forefront.
17
Yahya Al-Hilo, Mujtaba Muhammedali, and Hayder Ali Gebreen. "Totalitarianism in George Orwell's Animal Farm." Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal 2, no. 4 (December 24, 2021): 545–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v2i4.318.
Full textAbstract:
The Animal Farm attempts at representing a realistic analysis of the revolution and changing of systems and regimes. However, change may not be necessarily a positive one as long as there is not a just and fair system upon which the sons of the revolutions depend. As history has proved, the majority of revolutions fail to achieve the utopian goals they had been seeking. Then, it fails to achieve the goals that are sought from it. Eventually, the reality becomes worse than that which it aimed to change. Since the theme of this novel is applicable for all people in any place at any time, and the big role that political discourse played in its event, we have chosen it to be our subject to analyze and discuss in our graduation project. After this short abstract, we will present an introduction in which we show the author’s contribution in the world of literature, his famous works and their significance. After that, we move on to deal with the language and discourse, rhetoric speech and discourse of Orwel and his ideology. The we tend to cover the author’s life, political discourse, and finally the political discourse of the author in The Animal Farm. We end our paper with a conclusion which includes our points of view to the importance of the political discourse in the novel and the moral lessons the mankind can draw out from such great piece of literature.
18
Abass, Salim Kadhim. "Interconnection of Orwell's Novel Animal Farm as a Micro-Universe and Our Macro-Universe." Galore International Journal of Applied Sciences and Humanities 5, no. 4 (November 22, 2021): 27–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.52403/gijash.20211006.
Full textAbstract:
George Orwell is best known for his allegorical political novel, Animal Farm (1945), written in the period of Modernism in English literature. This novel is read as an offensive on totalitarianism in general, and a political satire against Stalinism Communist totalitarianism in particular. The current paper is conducted to investigate the relationship between the micro-universe which is represented by the narrative text of Orwell's novel Animal Farm, and macro-universe which represents the reality or the real world. The main aim of this study is to determine the interconnection of the micro-universe (the narrative text), and the macro-universe (the reality) through finding a convergence between the topics and events of the narrative text and our real world. Marxist Criticism and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) are used together as analytical approaches to investigate the selected narrative text and the historical, political, and social context in which the narrative text was written. The findings of this study points out that the narrative text of Animal Farm represents reality. This confirms the social and moral function of the committed literature which expresses human sufferings and aspirations for better conditions. The significance of the current study lies in provides better comprehension of the interconnection of the narrative text and reality as a missing feature in literature on this novel. This study contributes to literature on Orwell's novel Animal Farm particularly, and the field of the political English novels in general. Thus, this study extends the base of the researchers' knowledge in this literary area. Keywords: Micro-universe and Macro-universe, Modernism, Totalitarianism, Animal Farm.
19
Darmawan, Ruly Indra. "Revisiting Bhabha’s Mimicry in George Orwell’s Animal Farm." PIONEER: Journal of Language and Literature 12, no. 2 (December 31, 2020): 141. http://dx.doi.org/10.36841/pioneer.v12i2.731.
Full textAbstract:
This paper talks about Bhabha’s Mimicry’s idea in Orwell’s novel entitled Animal Farm. Postcolonialism theory is used to analyze the Animal Farm since the novel portrays the dynamic of animals’ lives after being freed from human colonization. Bhabha’s mimicry is utilized to demonstrate Napoleon and his pig family as the principal data that portrays animals that are imitating a human as a result of human’s colonization. The animal is known as the foe of humankind on the ranch that they live. Mimicry ideas utilized are Bhabha’s both ambivalence and term the same but not quite. Those ideas are practised to uncover the pig’s propensity and act that represents postcolonial discourse. The mimicry in Animal Farm begins with Old Major’s discourse that is contaminating all animals on the ranch with his feeling of inadequacy towards the man. It results in another form of colonization directed to the animals as the colonized.
20
Basuki, Edi Pujo. "MANIPULATIVE DISCOURSE IN GEORGE ORWEL’S ANIMAL FARM." Education and Human Development Journal 4, no. 1 (May 2, 2019): 80–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.33086/ehdj.v4i1.1086.
Full textAbstract:
Animal Farm has been called George Orwell’s most ferocious propaganda (Voorhees, 1961 quoted in Jasim, M. H. and Aziz, Fatimah H). This novel is a satire referring to a communist regime persistently utilizing the kind of hypocritical propaganda merely for the purpose of keeping its totalitarian regime in power.. Animal Farm demonstrates more of such manipulative discourse, and this will be the focus of the study. The contribution of this study is that understanding manipulative discourse and its strategies gives a view of manipulative mechanism and thereby help people recognizing any hegemony form by those in power. The framework of the study applied Cognitive Pragmatics for Manipulative Discourse and Relevance Theory. The result of the study describes the characters that represent manipulative discourse as well as the types of the employed strategies (both global and local, both linguistic and non-linguistic ones). Manipulative discourses employed in the novel are produced or reproduced for two main general purposes. Firstly, the political discourses produced by Old Major is to convince all the animals of the necessity to fight against the human being for the freedom of the animals. The ideology exercised by the animals is anti-human ideology. Secondly, the manipulative discourses produced and reproduced by the pigs are to exercise their domination over the rest of the animals. The ideology of the pigs’ racism is exercised to gain more power, more privilege, and more access to the farm resources.
21
Moreira, Lucas. "A DISTOPIA ANIMALESCA DE GEORGE ORWELL NO ROCK PROGRESSIVO DO PINK FLOYD." Estudos Linguísticos e Literários 1, no. 66 (September 26, 2020): 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.9771/ell.v1i66.36131.
Full textAbstract:
<p>À luz das traduções intersemióticas, reaproximamos a obra literária <em>A Revolução dos Bichos</em> (Animal Farm, 1946), de George Orwell, e o álbum <em>Animals</em> (1977), da banda de rock progressivo Pink Floyd, de modo a realizarmos análises comparativas sobre as transmutações que os signos de linguagens verbais sofreram ao migrarem para um código de linguagem musical. Com o foco nos aspectos da <em>animalidade</em>, veremos como tal instinto, compartilhado entre humanos e alegorias animalescas para representar formas de poder na arte, foi tratado nas duas distopias de linguagens diferentes, sendo que a obra pinkfloydiana é declarada e explicitamente decalque da literatura orwellinana.</p>
22
Xiao, Shilin. "An Analysis of Political Implications in Animal Farm from the Perspective of New Historicism." International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation 5, no. 3 (March 8, 2022): 102–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2022.5.3.13.
Full textAbstract:
George Orwell is a famous writer in the 20th century in England, especially known for his humanitarian spirit. Among his sharply written works, Animal Farm is of significant value to focus our attention on. This political allegory successfully creates a set of animal images, with some certain hidden meaning of political life. New Historicism offers readers another perspective to reorient into the context behind the text itself and reconsider the intertextuality between history and texts. Montrose proposes two concepts, “textuality of history” and “historicity of texts.” In the light of the two key concepts, this paper aims to take a descriptive approach to the political implications in Animal Farm with a focus on the close relationship between history and texts.
23
Lindasari, Maya Nur. "A Study of Diction in the Indonesian Translation Binatangisme from George Orwell`s Animal Farm." Humanitatis : Journal of Language and Literature 7, no. 2 (July 3, 2021): 117–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v7i2.1224.
Full textAbstract:
This article examined the Indonesian translation of the novel Animal Farm by George Orwell (1945). It was translated into Binatangisme by Mahbub Djunaidi, published in 1983. The diction of the novel was highlighted because diction was one of the important elements in the acceptability and accuracy words in literary works that need to be considered. There are three categories of dictions which analyzed in this article such as translation of pronoun, translation of cultural adaptation, and translation of terms and sentencing as proposed by Newmark (1988) and Nida (1964). The qualitative method in the form of content analysis was applied to obtain information data that are objective, systematic, and descriptive quantitative about what appears in the choice of diction. The data were collected through close reading which highlighting or giving comments in the forms of monologues and dialogues as well as phrases and sentences. While the data analysis was compared between the source language and the target language. As the result, the translation was near to the target language culture. Mostly, the translator tend to describe the meaning through detailed explanation and used more specific meaning words.
24
ŞAHİN, Ahmet. "The Criticism of Abuse of Religion in the Novel of Animal Farm by George Orwell." JOURNAL OF HISTORY AND FUTURE 7, no. 2 (June 22, 2020): 623–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.21551/jhf.905558.
Full text
25
Saroh, Ina Mina. "Strategi Penerjemahan Nama Diri dan Kecenderungan Ideologi dalam Versi Terjemahan Novel Animal Farm Karya George Orwell." LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya 17, no. 1 (June 15, 2021): 76–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.33633/lite.v17i1.4440.
Full textAbstract:
This paper aims to identify strategies for translating self-names (proper nouns) and ideological tendencies in translation works. The data sources used were the translated novel entitled Binatangisme (translated by Mahbub Djunaidi) as the source text and the English novel entitled Animal Farm by George Orwell as the source text. This research used the theory designed by Davies (2003) to identify translation strategies and ideological tendencies. According to Davies, there are seven translation strategies, namely preservation, addition, localization, omission, globalization, transformation and creation. The result obtained is that the translated version tends to domestication ideology. Of the 15 data analyzed, Mahbub Djunaidi's translated version has 46.67% tendencies of domestication ideology and 40% tendencies of foreignization ideology (the number is not 100% because some data using omission are considered neutral and not counted).
26
Saoudi, Bechir. "Totalitarianism and Class Warfare in George Orwell’s Animal Farm." Arab World English Journal For Translation and Literary Studies 6, no. 4 (October 24, 2022): 162–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol6no4.12.
Full textAbstract:
This article studies the struggle between classes in George Orwell’s novel Animal Farm (1945). The most suitable school of literary criticism to tackle such a subject is that of Marxism. Two basic Marxist principles are at the center of the study: class conflict and the notion of base and superstructure. The article addresses the ongoing class conflict occurring at the base between humans and pigs on the one hand and lower-class animals on the other. Three main questions have been addressed: In what ways does the upper class oppress the lower? How does the lower class respond? What is the outcome of the struggle? The study uncovers the major factors that allow the upper class to overcome the lower in Animal Farm. The lower-class response consists of both constructive and destructive attitudes. The balance is ultimately tipped towards authoritarianism, leading the animals to live in conditions worse than those of the pre-revolutionary period.
27
Koça, Suela, and Vasilika Pojani. "RELATIVE CLAUSES FROM ENGLISH TO ALBANIAN." CBU International Conference Proceedings 4 (September 22, 2016): 385–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v4.784.
Full textAbstract:
This paper aims to describe the use of relative clauses in English and Albanian by comparing different clause types. Some theoretical issues addressed in this article include the definition of relative clauses, the relativized elements, and the use of relative pronouns and adverbs in both languages. Distinctions and similarities are identified by analyzing the way in which these clauses are translated from English into Albanian. The theoretical part is illustrated by examples extracted from “Animal Farm” by George Orwell and “Pride and Prejudice” by Jane Austin, and their translated versions in Albanian, “Ferma e Kafshëve” and “Krenari dhe Paragjykime”.
28
Shaikh, Noman. "Symbolic political exploitation in George Orwell’s Animal Farm." Motifs : A Peer Reviewed International Journal of English Studies 7, no. 1 (2021): 98–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2454-1753.2021.00015.5.
Full text
29
MOUSTAPHA, FranckAlabi. "POWER AND SOCIETY IN GEORGE ORWELL’S ANIMAL FARM." International Journal of Advanced Research 4, no. 5 (May 31, 2016): 1287–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/572.
Full text
30
Islakhiyah, Mazro'atul, Suyatno, and Suharmono Kasiyun. "Comparison of Allegory Symbols in O Novel by Eka Kurniawan and Animal Farm by George Orwell." Tell : Teaching of English Language and Literature Journal 8, no. 1 (April 30, 2020): 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.30651/tell.v8i1.4399.
Full text
31
Fernandes, Renata Kelli Modesto. "DE OPRIMIDO A OPRESSOR: UM ESTUDO DO ‘HABITUS’, DE PIERRE BOURDIE NAS OBRAS ANIMAL FARM, DE GEORGE ORWELL E SÃO BERNARDO, DE GRACILIANO RAMOS." Revista de Literatura, História e Memória 16, no. 28 (December 22, 2020): 108–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.48075/rlhm.v16i28.24627.
Full textAbstract:
Este estudo tem como objetivo analisar a postura do porco Napoleão, personagem principal da obra Animal Farm, de George Orwell e de Paulo Honório, protagonista do livro São Bernardo, de Graciliano Ramos. Cercados pelos muros sociais, ambas as personagens são impossibilitadas de romper com sua condição e acabam levadas às práticas antigas de dominação. Reflexões acerca da teoria do ‘habitus’, de Pierre Bourdieu, norteiam o presente trabalho e oferecem subsídios necessários para a compreensão das relações sociais estabelecidas nas obras estudadas bem como as da vida real. Para além das contribuições de Bourdie, buscamos abordar a relação entre literatura e sociedade à luz de Antonio Candido.
32
Silva, Agnaldo Rodrigues da, and Thainá Aparecida Ramos de Oliveira. "Experiência distópica nas narrativas Animal Farm, de George Orwell (1945) e Fazenda Modelo – Novela Pecuária (1974), de Chico Buarque." Literatura e Autoritarismo, no. 26 (October 11, 2022): 107–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/1679849x70191.
Full textAbstract:
O presente artigo, pensado teoricamente pelo viés da distopia, objetiva analisar as narrativas Animal Farm, de George Orwell (1945) e Fazenda Modelo – Novela Pecuária (1974), de Chico Buarque, produções que articulam representações sociais complexas, geradas em contextos históricos de distintas motivações culturais e políticas. A escolha do corpus deu-se porque os enredos apresentam a configuração do autoritarismo e também de governos totalitários e ditatoriais, fatores esses que possibilitam um debate sobre o conceito de distopia e sobre a função da literatura, que não se fixa apenas na ideia de fruição estética, mas se torna um elemento capaz de questionar as várias esferas sociais, culturais, políticas e humanas que promovem os movimentos de imanência e transcendência entre a ficção e a história.
33
NICULESCU, Anemona. "Teaching the Speaking Skill through George Orwell’s Animal Farm." ANALELE UNIVERSITĂȚII DIN CRAIOVA SERIA ȘTIINȚE FILOLOGICE LIMBI STRĂINE APLICATE, no. 1 (January 2023): 310–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.52744/aucsflsa.2022.01.34.
Full text
34
MBON, Armel, and Garice Revaud IBOUANGA MABIALA. "A Connotative Analysis of Characters in George Orwell’s Animal Farm." International Journal of Literature Studies 2, no. 2 (December 30, 2022): 118–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.32996/ijts.2022.2.2.12.
Full textAbstract:
This article analyses the characters’ connotations in George Orwell’s political allegory, Animal Farm. Connotations generally fall into three categories: positive, neutral, and negative, categories that are clearly displayed when studying its characters. So, with the three kinds of characters, men, animals, and birds, that are found in this allegory, there are some that have positive connotations, like Old Major and Snowball, to quote but two, and others, negative connotations, like Napoleon and Squealer. Those who are neutral, like the Sheep, unwillingly lean towards antivalues for a simple reason: Animal Farm is, above all, a dystopia. Today, this allegory remains topical because it discusses the ever-growing abuses of political leaders over impotent peoples, but it is a hackneyed work, just like its themes. However, it arouses a lively interest when one touches on the figurative meaning of its characters. To do this, a semantic approach is used.
35
Osman Jabak, Dr Omar. "George Orwell's Animal Farm: An Outcry Against False Revolutionary Leaders." English Literature and Language Review, no. 510 (October 1, 2019): 173–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.32861/ellr.510.173.179.
Full textAbstract:
The present research study attempted to provide an interpretation of George Orwell’s Animal Farm as an outcry against false revolutionary leaders who go back on their promises and turn into dehumanized dictators even worse than the dictators against whom they and their fellow revolutionaries rebelled. To achieve that objective, the researcher read the novella critically within its socio-political context and traced the transformation of the leading character, Napoleon, who stands for such revolutionary leaders. The data of the current research were all extracted from Orwell’s Animal Farm. The researcher used content analysis to analyze the selected data and developed an analytical comparison through which he closely examined Napoleon’s character before and after the revolution. The findings of the study revealed that Napoleon was an opportunistic revolutionary who used the revolution to an evil end. Napoleon’s dramatic transformation from a noble revolutionary into a ruthless, corrupt ruler proved that Orwell’s novella can be read as an attack on false revolutionary leaders who become dehumanized despots, far worse than the dictators whom they aspired to replace with democratic leaders.
36
Sekret, Iryna. "Strategies of conveying metaphors in political discourse: analysis of the Turkish translations of George Orwell's “Animal Farm”." International journal of linguistics, literature and culture 6, no. 4 (May 18, 2020): 103–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v6n4.911.
Full textAbstract:
Translating metaphor and metaphoric expressions is one of the disputable problems in translation studies due to the conceptual discrepancies which exist between the source culture and the target readership, moreover, if the metaphor plays a crucial role in creating an appeal to the reader as in the political text. In this respect, it is under the discussion of how to deal with a metaphor when translating political discourse, and what are the dominating strategies and traditions of translating metaphoric units in Turkish translations. Caused by the theoretical and practical urgency of the problem, this paper is aimed to analyze strategies of conveying metaphors from English to Turkish based on the novel “Animal Farm” by George Orwell and its Turkish translations by Sedat Demir and Celal Üster. To achieve the aims of the research the efforts were undertaken to compare the original text with its two different translations. For the precise analysis, Old Major’s speech was thoroughly scrutinized on the point of the metaphoric expressions in the text and their correspondences in the Turkish translations.
37
Nur, Nurul Akbar, and Burhanuddin Arafah. "THE REFLECTION OF CLASSLESS SOCIETY IN GEORGE ORWELL’S ANIMAL FARM." JURNAL ILMU BUDAYA 8, no. 1 (March 31, 2020): 91. http://dx.doi.org/10.34050/jib.v8i1.9113.
Full textAbstract:
This research intends to the classless society in Animal Farm. Therefore, the researchers analyzed how the reflection of the classless society in the novel. In analyzing this research, the researchers used a sociological approach to describes the classless society that is reflected in the novel Animal Farm. The researcher analyzes literary work based on the text and explains the sociological meaning by uses Marxist literary theory. The researcher analyzes the communism concept practiced and reflected to the society (farm) to create public welfare Moreover, the researcher used a qualitative method and descriptive analysis method in analyzing the data. There are two sources of data which are primary data and supporting data. The primary data was taken of the novel Orwell’s Animal Farm. Meanwhile, the supporting data were taken from book, journal, theses, and article. The result of this research is the researchers find the author’s way to reflected the classless society in the novel.
38
Omar, Nourhan Mustafa Ezzat. "The Use of Semantic Prosody and Concordance In Analyzing the Idea of Rebellion in Animal Farm by George Orwell." Egyptian Journal of English Language and Literature Studies 10, no. 1 (December 1, 2021): 173–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/ejels.2021.227209.
Full text
39
Sewlall, H. "George Orwell's Animal Farm: A metonym for a dictatorship." Literator 23, no. 3 (August 6, 2002): 81–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/lit.v23i3.344.
Full textAbstract:
George Orwell’s Animal Farm is traditionally read as a satire on dictatorships in general, and the Bolshevik Revolution in particular. This article postulates the notion that the schema of the book has attained the force of metonymy to such an extent that whenever one alludes to the title of the book or some lines from it, one conjures up images associated with a dictatorship. The title of the book has become a part of the conceptual political lexicon of the English language to refer to the corruption of a utopian ideology. As an ideological state, Animal Farm has its vision, which is embedded in its constitution; it has the vote, a national anthem and a flag. It even has its patriots, double-dealers, social engineers and lechers. In this way the title Animal Farm, like Joseph Heller’s Catch-22, or Thomas More’s Utopia, functions metonymically to map a conceptual framework which matches the coordinates of the book. The article concludes with a look at contemporary society to show how Orwell’s satire endorses the words of Lord Acton, namely, that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
40
Valizadeh, Mohammadreza, and Ahmad Ezzati Vazifehkhah. "Non-Equivalence at Idiomatic and Expressional Level and the Strategies to Deal With: English Translation into Persian in Animal Farm by George Orwell." Shanlax International Journal of Education 9, no. 4 (September 1, 2021): 163–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i4.4095.
Full textAbstract:
This paper makes an effort to investigate the obstacles in nonequivalence at the idiomatic and expressional level and then presents some certain factors to face such difficulties in Animal Farm novel (1945) by George Orwell and its translation by Amir Amirshahi (1969). The researchers in the current study try by analyzing six certain strategies as using an idiomatic expression of similar meaning and form, similar meaning but dissimilar form, borrowing the source language, translation by paraphrase, translation by the omission of a play on idiomatic expression and translation by the omission of entire idiomatic expression (Baker, 2011). Moreover, the present research is a descriptive, non-judgmental, comparative and corpus-based analysis of EnglishPersian parallel study. The findings demonstrate the fact that the practical ways in the translation of idiomatic expressions presented by Baker (2011) are applicable, and the most useable strategy is using an idiomatic expression of similar meaning but dissimilar form at 35.96%.
41
Khan, Nazia Hassan, Marriam Bashir, and Raj Wali Khan. "Investigating the Tenets of Post-structuralism in George Orwell's Animal Farm." Global Language Review VII, no. III (September 30, 2022): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glr.2022(vii-iii).01.
Full textAbstract:
In literary theory, the term Post-structuralism is a prominent concept which is built upon structuralism and at the same time it negates the ideas associated with that. Though post-structuralists all present different critiques of structuralism, common themes among them include the rejection of the self-sufficiency of structuralism, as well as an interrogation of the binary oppositions that constitute its structures. Accordingly, post-structuralism discards the idea of interpreting media (or the world) within pre-established, socially constructed structures. The purpose of this research was to revisit Post-Structuralism by selecting George Orwell's Animal Farm as a target text for this research. Post-Structuralists like Derrida (1966),Foucault (1994), and Barthes (1975) argue that no ultimate truth can be found with the help of binary opposition. Power and knowledge change the truth and pre-existing realities into a new phenomena. This research endorses the ideas of poststructuralists and Animal Farm offers allegorical representation which indicates a multiplicity of truth.
42
Dr. Ritu Kumari. "George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty Four: A Dystopian Novel." Creative Launcher 5, no. 2 (June 30, 2020): 162–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.53032/tcl.2020.5.2.20.
Full textAbstract:
The famous British author George Orwell, pen name of Eric Arthur Blair, was born in motihari (East Champaran, Bihar), then under Bengal Presidency in British India on June 25, 1903. However, he left Motihari when he was only one year old, went with his mother to England for his schooling and for higher studies, wrote many novels, but became famous for the two, Animal Farm, a modern beast fable attacking Russian revolution and Stalinism, and 1984, a dystopian novel setting forth his fear of totalitarian government and Increasingly bureaucratic state of the future, Nineteen Eighty four often published as 1984, is a dystopian novel published in 1949. Set in Oceania, one of the three Intercontinental super states that divided the world among themselves after a global atomic war, the story unfolds in London, the chief city of Airstrip one, governed by the Party, dictated by political system euphemistically named Engsocialism or Ingsoc in the government Invented language called newspeak, under the privileged elite of the Inner Party, that persecutes individualism and independent thinking headed by the big brother which is a tyrannical figure “Posters screaming” BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU. Big brother, is just the name, someone who is unseen and all the people are scared of Big brother. He keeps an eye on everything. He has CCTV, telescreens to control the society. Every street corner, every lamp post, and every wall has life- size picture of Big Brother's face, his eyes following wary citizens as they walk, cast it."
43
Lukač, Dora. "That’s not my name: Translation of proper names in Croatian and Russian (re)translations of George Orwell’s Animal Farm: A Fairy Story." Hieronymus : Časopis za istraživanja prevođenja i terminologije 7 (2021): 104–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.17234/hieronymus.7.5.
Full textAbstract:
The procedures for rendering proper names have been studied mostly in works belonging to the fantasy genre and children’s literature. Although George Orwell’s Animal Farm belongs to neither of the two categories, it is affiliated with the subgenre of allegory, which represents quite a challenge to any potential translator. However, the real motivation behind the choice of this book lies in its criticism of the Soviet Union, especially since it was published in 1945, meaning that the political and socio-cultural context influenced its publication and reception to a great extent. This study aims to identify the procedures applied in rendering proper names from Animal Farm in two Croatian (the first translation and retranslation) and four Russian translations (the first translation and three retranslations), and to determine the differences among the translations into the same target language, as well as the differences between Croatian and Russian target texts. Finally, a study of first translations and subsequent retranslations will enable us to detect diachronic changes in the general translation orientations.
44
Dasaolu, Babajide Olugbenga. "Education and Social Change in the Works of Karl Popper and George Orwell: A Pedagogy of Caution for Marxists in Africa." International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership, no. 12 (December 20, 2021): 221–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.31874/2520-6702-2021-12-2-221-233.
Full textAbstract:
Some decades ago, the Brazilian scholar Paulo Freire wrote his Pedagogy of the Oppressed to indicate the rationale for social change and the place of education in that affair. This study takes a leaf from Freire’s work to dialogue how authentic and people-centered social change can be attained in Africa. In contemporary African political scholarship, scholars are divided over the methodology of attaining social change. Some take inspiration from the thoughts of Karl Popper who maintains that there are two approaches toward social change: The Piecemeal and the Utopian. It is also the case that Popper puts trust and emphasis on the former when he doubts and opposes the latter, which appeals mostly to Marxists in Africa. Since it has become a dominant locus for almost all of African scholars to take a Marxist approach in their articulation and struggle for social change, this study intends to serve as a caution. Caution because, it is an open secret that Marxists of African descent have been very critical and bitter of Popper’s version of social change for being reactionary; that it is a viewpoint which aims to preserve an exploitative status quo. When the onus of this study is to defend Popper against such uncharitable misrepresentations, it forays into George Orwell’s classic Animal Farm, for succor. Orwell’s fable is a revelation of the dangers that may emanate from Utopian social engineering in real life scenario. The unfortunate totalitarian era that greeted the animals in the aftermath of their violent and bloody revolution in Manor Farm is not only a lesson but serves to initiate the discourse regarding the intention and integrity of those leading social change and struggles across Africa. It is precisely for this reason that this essay beckons on Africans to initiate a platform for social change that will be void of violence and bloodshed. By taking a pedagogy approach to education, this research would have been able to explore the ways through which education can contribute to the plight of social change and social stability in Africa.
45
Saeedi, Samira. "New Perspectives on Retranslation: The Case of Iran." TranscUlturAl: A Journal of Translation and Cultural Studies 12, no. 1 (August 6, 2020): 27–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.21992/tc29496.
Full textAbstract:
This paper examines the social aspects of retranslation in contemporary Iran. Foreign classics and award-winning literary books have attracted multiple translations into Persian within a short period of time. For instance, George Orwell’s novella, Animal Farm, has received more than one hundred retranslations in the last 40 years. The aim of this paper is to investigate possible reasons for such an unusually high number of retranslations. By analysing sixteen interviews with Iranian translators and publishers and performing paratextual analysis of four retranslations of George Orwell’s Animal Farm, this paper sheds light on the perceived advantages and disadvantages of retranslation. It does so by drawing on the trust-based approach to the study of translation proposed by Rizzi, Lang, and Pym, and by offering sociological insight into retranslation in contemporary Iran. Four groups of translators are identified: amateur, early career, mid-career, and senior translators. Retranslation for the former two groups is viewed as profitable trade in literary translation market. For the latter two, retranslation is the process of reinforcing trustworthiness at the institutional level that means trust in professionalism of certain Iranian translators and publishers.
46
Pulla, Venkat Rao. "The Not-So-Silent Rise of Nationalism: A COVID-19 Result." Space and Culture, India 10, no. 3 (November 28, 2022): 125–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.20896/saci.v10i3.1266.
Full textAbstract:
Since the discovery and surge of the COVID-19 virus in the early days of 2020, we saw the creepy crawl of accusations and counteraccusations, the divisions between the scientific communities, the lack of exemplary conduct by the political elites, the lack of transparency in the reporting of death statistics, and the increasing lack of confidence and support for people. Amidst all this was a burgeoning of defensive and, on many occasions, offensive nationalism. A stage that mirrored resounding the amended final command from the 1924 George Orwell’s Animal farms, wherein the Pigs, the more intelligent of the manor farm animals, proclaim that some animals are more equal than others.
47
Sepehri, Zhilla, and Razieh Eslamieh. "The Effect of Implicitation & Explicitation Strategies on the Acceptance of Two Different Farsi Translations of George Orwell’s Animal Farm." International Journal of Linguistics 13, no. 5 (September 24, 2021): 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v13i5.18878.
Full textAbstract:
Explicitating and implicitating are among the significant facets of texts in Translation Studies. They vary across languages in terms of the way and process of transferring into another language. This research presents a study of explicitation and implicitation in translation. Explicitating and implicitating shifts were manually identified in a corpus of English and their translations in presian. Explicitating and implicitating Shifts were classified according to Vahedi Kia’s (2011) framework. The study tries to explore the percentage of the usage of explicitations and implicitating in two different translations of George Orwell’s Animal Farm. The main aim of the study was to specify the relation and the Effect of implicitation & explicitation strategies on the acceptance of two different farsi translations of George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Unlike most other studies of explicitation in translation, the present study did not depart from the assumption of a ‘translation-inherent’, universal process of explicitation (cf. Blum-Kulka’s Explicitation Hypothesis). Rather, the prediction underlying the study was that every instance of explicitation (and implicitation) can be explained as a result of lexicogrammatical and/or pragmatic factors. This analysis has made it possible to compile a list of factors that regularly lead translators to explicitate or implicitate. The factors explain why implicitations are often outnumbered by the corresponding explicitations.
48
YILDIZ, Fırat. "A COMPARISON OF TOTALITARIANISM IN GEORGE ORWELL'S ANIMAL FARM AND ZULFU LIVANELI'S LAST ISLAND." International Journal of Social Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR) 4, no. 10 (January 1, 2017): 355–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.58.
Full text
49
Metcalf, James A. "George Orwell’s Animal Farm: a case study in leadership/management for undergraduate nursing students." Nurse Education in Practice 5, no. 4 (July 2005): 252–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2005.03.005.
Full text
50
Bai, Liping. "Translator’s Ideology, Dominant Ideology and the Use of Pseudonym." Archiv orientální 82, no. 3 (December 13, 2014): 539–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.47979/aror.j.82.3.539-554.
Full textAbstract:
This article seeks to decipher the intricate relationship between translation, the translator’s ideology, the dominant ideology, and the use of pseudonym. It does so through analyzing Liang Shiqiu’s Chinese version of George Orwell’s political satire Animal Farm, written under the pen name of Li Qichun. We will investigate the similarities and differences between Liang’s translations under the pseudonym and the ones written under his real name. In addition, we will explore the conflicts that existed between the translator’s ideology and the dominant ideology of the time when the translation was produced, trying to solve the riddle of why he used the pen name Li Qichun when translating Animal Farm. The study indicates that although there is a similarity between Liang’s translation of Animal Farm under the pen name of Li Qichun and his translation work under his real name, the differences are significant. In terms of the translator’s ideology, Liang was against any form of totalitarianism. The purpose behind translating Animal Farm was to combat totalitarianism, but ironically and paradoxically the society in which the translation was produced was also a totalitarian society. Through reference to the pseudonym we may discover the interactions and conflicts that exist between the translator’s ideology and the dominant ideology of a certain special historical period.