Academic literature on the topic 'Annexation of Nabataea'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Annexation of Nabataea.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Annexation of Nabataea"

1

Wenner, Sarah, and S. Thomas Parker. "Response to Erickson-Gini’s "Problems and solutions in dating Nabataean pottery in the post-annexation period"." Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean, no. 30/2 (December 31, 2021): 707–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.31338/uw.2083-537x.pam30.2.07.

Full text
Abstract:
In the late 1990s, Stephan G. Schmid published a chronological typology of Nabataean Painted Fineware (NPFW) that was widely accepted by scholars of Nabataea and Roman Arabia. Tali Erickson-Gini has since raised concerns about parts of his NPFW typology, specifically related to two decoration types dating to the end of the 1st century and the beginning of the 2nd century CE (Dekorphases 3b and 3c). This article is a response to Erickson-Gini’s critique, published in this volume. We find that there is sufficient evidence to broadly validate Schmid’s proposed dating for the beginning of producti
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Cotton, Hannah. "The Guardianship of Jesus Son of Babatha: Roman and Local Law in the Province of Arabia." Journal of Roman Studies 83 (November 1993): 94–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/300980.

Full text
Abstract:
The Babatha archive contains documents of a Jewish woman who lived in the village of Maoza situated on the southern shore of the Dead Sea, in what had been the kingdom of Nabataea and became in 106 C.E. the Roman province of Arabia. The first dated document in the archive dates to 22 Elul (August/September) 94 and the last to 19 August 132; some of the documents therefore precede the annexation of Arabia, but the majority follow it. This offers a rare opportunity to examine the consequences of Roman annexation: by examining in detail the changes effected by the Roman presence in the newly acqu
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Parker, S. Thomas. "Nabataean and Roman coarse ware cooking pottery from Aila (Aqaba, Jordan)." Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean, no. 30/2 (December 31, 2021): 655–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.31338/uw.2083-537x.pam30.2.02.

Full text
Abstract:
The Roman Aqaba Project seeks to reconstruct diachronically the economic history of the ancient port of Aila on the Red Sea (now modern Aqaba in southern Jordan). Excavations of Aila between 1994 and 2003 yielded an enormous quantity of stratified ceramic evidence. This paper focuses on coarse ware cooking vessels recovered from Aila dating to the 1st to early 5th centuries. Although the potters of Aila were influenced by the ceramic traditions of the Nabataean capital at Petra, they also developed an independent ceramic tradition. Further, the Roman annexation of Nabataea in 106 CE, including
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Erickson-Gini, Tali. "Problems and solutions in dating Nabataean pottery of the post-annexation period." Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean, no. 30/2 (December 31, 2021): 681–706. http://dx.doi.org/10.31338/uw.2083-537x.pam30.2.01.

Full text
Abstract:
In the desert regions of the Southern Levant, the dating of Nabataean sherds and vessels is a critical factor in determining the dates of archaeological strata, architecture, and even entire sites. In recent years, archaeologists working at Petra and related sites have tended to date most Nabataean sherds and vessels to the 1st century CE based on the proposed typo-chronology of the Swiss–Liechtenstein excavations at al-Zantur in Petra, published by Stephan G. Schmid (2000). Accepted typo-chronologies must withstand scrutiny and can override imposed historical frameworks. However, an uncritica
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Cimadomo, Paolo. "The controversial annexation of the Nabataean Kingdom." Levant 50, no. 2 (2018): 258–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00758914.2019.1614769.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Al-Jallad, Ahmad, and Michael C. A. Macdonald. "The Roman annexation of the Nabataean kingdom: a Safaitic witness." Semitica et Classica 17 (January 2024): 303–12. https://doi.org/10.1484/j.sec.5.144599.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Wenner, Sarah. "Test of the Nabataean Painted Fine Ware typology in Aila’s Area K." Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean, no. 30/2 (December 31, 2021): 595–610. http://dx.doi.org/10.31338/uw.2083-537x.pam30.2.04.

Full text
Abstract:
Although Nabataean Painted Fine Ware (NPFW) has been examined in light of Stephan Schmid’s chronological typology since the late 1990s, few stratified contexts with NPFW from outside Petra have been published, and none derived from contexts occupied continuously from the Nabataean through Byzantine periods. Questions remain about the dating of later dekorphases (3–4) due to a lack of contexts. This paucity is remedied, however, by Area K at Roman Aqaba/Aila, Jordan. Area K was a domestic complex, just inside the later Byzantine city wall, excavated from 1994 through 2002. Using associated numi
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Atkinson, Kenneth. "Judean Piracy, Judea and Parthia, and the Roman Annexation of Judea: The Evidence of Pompeius Trogus." Electrum 29 (October 21, 2022): 127–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.4467/20800909el.22.009.15779.

Full text
Abstract:
Pompey the Great’s 63 BCE conquest of the Jewish kingdom known as the Hasmonean State has traditionally been viewed as an inevitable event since the Roman Republic had long desired to annex the Middle Eastern nations. The prevailing consensus is that the Romans captured the Hasmonean state, removed its high-priest kings from power, and made its territory part of the Republic merely through military force. However, Justin’s Epitome of the Philippic Histories of Pompeius Trogus is a neglected source of new information for understanding relations between the Romans and the Jews at this time. Trog
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Al-Otaibi, Fahad Mutlaq. "THE ANNEXATION OF THE NABATAEAN KINGDOM IN 106 A.D: NEW EPIGRAPHIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSIDERATION." October 16, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.27743.

Full text
Abstract:
In 106 A.D., the Roman empreior Trajan annexed the Nabataean kingdom and formed the new province i.e. Roman Arabia. One of the vexed question regarding the annexation of Nabataea is that was it bloodless or there was Nabataean resistance? Such question of broad significance will be discussed below. In contrast to the general consensus among scholars that the annexation was peaceful, this article will argue that there was Nabataean armed resistance of the Roman annexation of their kingdom. Such an argument will be basid only on archaeological and epigraphic evidence.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Anna, Accettola. "Petra Great Temple." Database of Religious History, June 27, 2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12573458.

Full text
Abstract:
The capital of the Nabataean kingdom was the city of Petra. In the heart of Petra lay the Great Temple, an enormous complex for worship and community gatherings. Given its prominent location in the center of Petra's main valley, the Great Temple was the dominant building in the city's skyline. While the use of the Great Temple remains at the center of on-going debate, the various phases of building show the its integration with the cultural and political development of the city and her people from the height of independent Nabataea to its annexation by Rome. Theories about the Great Temple ran
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Annexation of Nabataea"

1

Tholbecq, Laurent. "Petra during the Nabataean, Roman, and Byzantine Periods." In The Oxford Handbook of the Hellenistic and Roman Near East. Oxford University Press, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190858155.013.53.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This chapter discusses the origins and development of Petra (Jordan), between the fourth century bc and the eighth century ad. The city developed as a flourishing Hellenistic capital, reaching its peak at the turn of the era, with monumental expressions of royal power (palace, temples, mausoleum). After the Roman annexation of the Nabataean kingdom in ad 106, Petra turned into a locally important city of Provincia Arabia and went through various historical dynamics reflected by its remains revealed by archaeology. Apart for several religious buildings, a shift toward Petra’s eastern h
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Strobel, Karl. "Divus Traianus Parthicus and the Near East." In The Oxford Handbook of the Hellenistic and Roman Near East. Oxford University Press, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190858155.013.86.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The compromise peace that concluded Nero’s Parthian War, Vespasian’s subsequent reorganization of the provinces, and the annexation of Commagene and Lesser Armenia ensured the stability of the eastern part of the empire until the time of Trajan. Trajan decided to annex the Nabataean kingdom in the winter of ad 105/106, making it the Roman province of Arabia and strengthening the Roman presence in the Red Sea. Next, Trajan embarked on a large-scale war of conquest in the east. Despite the military successes of 114 and 115, culminating in the conquest of Ctesiphon and the establishing o
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!