Academic literature on the topic 'Antagonista GnRH'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Antagonista GnRH.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Antagonista GnRH"
Chianese, Rosanna, Vincenza Ciaramella, Donatella Scarpa, Silvia Fasano, Riccardo Pierantoni, and Rosaria Meccariello. "Anandamide regulates the expression of GnRH1, GnRH2, and GnRH-Rs in frog testis." American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism 303, no. 4 (2012): E475—E487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00086.2012.
Full textLeaños-Miranda, Alfredo, Alfredo Ulloa-Aguirre, Laura A. Cervini, Jo Ann Janovick, Jean Rivier, and P. Michael Conn. "Identification of new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone partial agonists." Journal of Endocrinology 189, no. 3 (2006): 509–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1677/joe.1.06724.
Full textTzoupis, Haralambos, Agathi Nteli, Maria-Eleni Androutsou, and Theodore Tselios. "Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone and GnRH Receptor: Structure, Function and Drug Development." Current Medicinal Chemistry 27, no. 36 (2020): 6136–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0929867326666190712165444.
Full textWeng, Shun-Long, Shu-Ling Tzeng, Chun-I. Lee, et al. "Association between GnRH Receptor Polymorphisms and Luteinizing Hormone Levels for Low Ovarian Reserve Infertile Women." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 13 (2021): 7006. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137006.
Full textFinch, Ann R., Christopher J. Caunt, Stephen P. Armstrong, and Craig A. McArdle. "Plasma Membrane Expression of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors: Regulation by Peptide and Nonpeptide Antagonists." Molecular Endocrinology 24, no. 2 (2010): 423–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/me.2009-0343.
Full textRosan, Pedro Luís, Gustavo Salata Romão, Rosana Maria dos Reis, Marcos Dias de Moura, and Rui Alberto Ferriani. "Uso de antagonista de GnRH (cetrorelix) em dose única para evitar ovulações prematuras em ciclos de fertilização assistida." Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia 25, no. 8 (2003): 563–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-72032003000800004.
Full textSperduti, Samantha, Silvia Limoncella, Clara Lazzaretti, et al. "GnRH Antagonists Produce Differential Modulation of the Signaling Pathways Mediated by GnRH Receptors." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 22 (2019): 5548. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20225548.
Full textSchauer, Christian, Tong Tong, Hugues Petitjean, et al. "Hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor neurons fire in synchrony with the female reproductive cycle." Journal of Neurophysiology 114, no. 2 (2015): 1008–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00357.2015.
Full textChen, Junling, Beum-Soo An, Linan Cheng, Geoffrey L. Hammond та Peter C. K. Leung. "Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone-Mediated Phosphorylation of Estrogen Receptor-α Contributes to fosB Expression in Mouse Gonadotrophs". Endocrinology 150, № 10 (2009): 4583–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/en.2009-0455.
Full textKawamura, Kazuhiro, Jun Fukuda, Jin Kumagai, et al. "Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone I Analog Acts as an Antiapoptotic Factor in Mouse Blastocysts." Endocrinology 146, no. 9 (2005): 4105–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/en.2004-1646.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Antagonista GnRH"
Cota, Ana Márcia de Miranda [UNESP]. "Agonista versus antagonista do GnRH em ciclos de reprodução assistida: morfologia oocitária." Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/99221.
Full textCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Na reprodução assistida, a seleção de gametas com o objetivo de alcançar melhores resultados clínicos é uma tarefa crucial dos embriologistas. A qualidade do oócito é um fator chave na fertilidade feminina, refletindo o potencial intrínseco de desenvolvimento do gameta, além de ter um papel crucial não só na fecundação, mas também no desenvolvimento embrionário subsequente. Após a desnudação, consegue-se definir a maturidade oocitária, com a identificação do primeiro corpúsculo polar, além de permitir a avaliação da morfologia oocitária, analisando as características da zona pelúcida, do espaço perivitelino e do citoplasma. Os dismorfismos oocitários são classificados em 2 tipos: citoplasmáticos, que incluem a presença de granulações e/ou de inclusões citoplasmáticas (vacúolos, corpos refrativos, agregados do retículo endoplasmático) e extracitoplasmáticos (alterações na forma do oócito, alterações na zona pelúcida, no espaço perivitelino e alterações do corpúsculo polar). Essas variações na morfologia oocitária podem ocorrer devido a fatores como idade da mulher, problemas genéticos e alterações no ambiente hormonal a que o oócito é exposto com a hiperestimulação ovariana. A classificação da morfologia oocitária, bem como sua correlação com o desenvolvimento embrionário e taxa de gravidez são bastante controversas na literatura. Vários estudos não demonstram nenhuma associação entre os dismorfismos oocitários e os resultados da fertilização in vitro, enquanto outros relatam uma associação entre a morfologia oocitária e desenvolvimento embrionário. Essas diferenças nos resultados podem ser explicadas devido a utilização de diferentes critérios morfológicos e devido...
The selection of developmentally competent human gametes may increase the efficiency of assisted reproduction. Spermatozoa and oocytes are usually assessed according to morphologic criteria. Oocyte morphology can be affected by the age of the female, genetic aspects, and factors related to controlled ovarian stimulation. However, there is a lack of evidence in the literature concerning the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues, either agonists or antagonists, on oocyte morphology. The aim of this randomized study was to investigate if the prevalence of oocyte dysmorphism is influenced by the type of pituitary suppression used in ovarian stimulation. A total of 64 patients at the first intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle, were prospectively randomized to receive treatment with either a GnRH agonist with a long-term protocol (n: 32) or a GnRH antagonist with a multi-dose protocol (n: 32). Before being subjected to ICSI, the oocytes at metaphase II from both groups were morphologically analyzed under an inverted light microscope at a 400x magnification. The oocytes were classified as follows: normal or with cytoplasmic dysmorphism, extracytoplasmic dysmorphism, or both. The resulting measure was the detection of dysmorphic oocytes among the total number of oocytes analyzed. Out of a total of 681 oocytes, 189 (27.8%) were morphologically normal, 220 (32.3%) showed cytoplasmic dysmorphism, 124 (18.2%) showed extracytoplasmic alterations, and 148 (21.7%) exhibited both types of dysmorphisms. No significant difference was observed in oocyte dysmorphisms between the agonist- and antagonisttreated groups (P>0.05). Analysis for each dysmorphism revealed that the most common conditions were alterations in polar body shape (31.3%) and presence of diffuse cytoplasmic granulations (22.8%), refractile bodies (18.5%) and central cytoplasmic... (Complete abstract click access electronic below)
Cota, Ana Márcia de Miranda. "Agonista versus antagonista do GnRH em ciclos de reprodução assistida : morfologia oocitária /." Botucatu : [s.n.], 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/99221.
Full textCoorientador: Claudia Guilhermino Petersen
Banca: Mario Cavagna
Banca: Anice Maria Vieira de Camargo Martins
Resumo: Na reprodução assistida, a seleção de gametas com o objetivo de alcançar melhores resultados clínicos é uma tarefa crucial dos embriologistas. A qualidade do oócito é um fator chave na fertilidade feminina, refletindo o potencial intrínseco de desenvolvimento do gameta, além de ter um papel crucial não só na fecundação, mas também no desenvolvimento embrionário subsequente. Após a desnudação, consegue-se definir a maturidade oocitária, com a identificação do primeiro corpúsculo polar, além de permitir a avaliação da morfologia oocitária, analisando as características da zona pelúcida, do espaço perivitelino e do citoplasma. Os dismorfismos oocitários são classificados em 2 tipos: citoplasmáticos, que incluem a presença de granulações e/ou de inclusões citoplasmáticas (vacúolos, corpos refrativos, agregados do retículo endoplasmático) e extracitoplasmáticos (alterações na forma do oócito, alterações na zona pelúcida, no espaço perivitelino e alterações do corpúsculo polar). Essas variações na morfologia oocitária podem ocorrer devido a fatores como idade da mulher, problemas genéticos e alterações no ambiente hormonal a que o oócito é exposto com a hiperestimulação ovariana. A classificação da morfologia oocitária, bem como sua correlação com o desenvolvimento embrionário e taxa de gravidez são bastante controversas na literatura. Vários estudos não demonstram nenhuma associação entre os dismorfismos oocitários e os resultados da fertilização in vitro, enquanto outros relatam uma associação entre a morfologia oocitária e desenvolvimento embrionário. Essas diferenças nos resultados podem ser explicadas devido a utilização de diferentes critérios morfológicos e devido... (Resumo completo, clicar acesso eletrônico abaixo)
Abstract: The selection of developmentally competent human gametes may increase the efficiency of assisted reproduction. Spermatozoa and oocytes are usually assessed according to morphologic criteria. Oocyte morphology can be affected by the age of the female, genetic aspects, and factors related to controlled ovarian stimulation. However, there is a lack of evidence in the literature concerning the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues, either agonists or antagonists, on oocyte morphology. The aim of this randomized study was to investigate if the prevalence of oocyte dysmorphism is influenced by the type of pituitary suppression used in ovarian stimulation. A total of 64 patients at the first intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle, were prospectively randomized to receive treatment with either a GnRH agonist with a long-term protocol (n: 32) or a GnRH antagonist with a multi-dose protocol (n: 32). Before being subjected to ICSI, the oocytes at metaphase II from both groups were morphologically analyzed under an inverted light microscope at a 400x magnification. The oocytes were classified as follows: normal or with cytoplasmic dysmorphism, extracytoplasmic dysmorphism, or both. The resulting measure was the detection of dysmorphic oocytes among the total number of oocytes analyzed. Out of a total of 681 oocytes, 189 (27.8%) were morphologically normal, 220 (32.3%) showed cytoplasmic dysmorphism, 124 (18.2%) showed extracytoplasmic alterations, and 148 (21.7%) exhibited both types of dysmorphisms. No significant difference was observed in oocyte dysmorphisms between the agonist- and antagonisttreated groups (P>0.05). Analysis for each dysmorphism revealed that the most common conditions were alterations in polar body shape (31.3%) and presence of diffuse cytoplasmic granulations (22.8%), refractile bodies (18.5%) and central cytoplasmic... (Complete abstract click access electronic below)
Mestre
Arruda, Jalsi Tacon. "Comparação entre dois protocolos para estimulação ovariana com agonista/antagonista do hormônio liberador de gonadotrofinas (GnRH) em mulheres submetidas ao primeiro ciclo de reprodução assistida." Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2013. http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/3814.
Full textApproved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2014-12-22T11:01:46Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Jalsi Tacon Arruda - 2013.pdf: 4216712 bytes, checksum: ec49a9884c1f4b73b53a9b224c7c4aa1 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-22T11:01:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Jalsi Tacon Arruda - 2013.pdf: 4216712 bytes, checksum: ec49a9884c1f4b73b53a9b224c7c4aa1 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-07-01
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES
Infertility affects more couples and assisted reproduction techniques offer a possibility of treatment and the chance of having a child. Thus, the first attempt to ovulation induction is critical to the success of the cycle or even for future attempts is successful. Objective: To compare the protocols using GnRH agonist or antagonist for ovarian stimulation in normo-responders undergoing the first cycle of IVF/ICSI. Methods: we conducted a literature review on the history of ovulation induction controlled by medications. From the data available in the database of electronic medical records SISFERT used in the Laboratory of Human Reproduction (LabRep-HC-FM-UFG) a comparative retrospective observational study was conducted with 50 patients divided into two groups according to protocol: GnRH-agonist (leuprolide acetate 1 mg/day short protocol) or GnRHantagonist (Cetrorelix 0.25 mg/day), which received 150 IU/day of rFSH (follitropin alpha) and 250 µg of rhCG (alpha-coriogonadotrofina) in both groups. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in the days of stimulation with rFSH, total dose of gonadotropin, days of use of GnRH, GnRH dose and total number of follicles (≥ 16 mm) on the day of the group rhCG GnRH agonist. There was no significant difference in other parameters, however, the number of oocytes retrieved was slightly higher in the GnRH agonist, but fertilization rate was higher in the GnRH-antagonist. Pregnancy rates and clinical chemistry were similar in both groups. Conclusions: although no significant differences in the results analyzed, the use of flexible antagonist protocol facilitates the handling and enables the patient using much lower doses of gonadotropins itself as the antagonist, reducing the cost of treatment when compared to the protocol with GnRH agonist.
A infertilidade afeta cada vez mais casais e as técnicas de reprodução assistida oferecem uma possibilidade de tratamento e a chance de ter um filho. Assim, a primeira tentativa de indução da ovulação é fundamental para o sucesso do ciclo ou, até mesmo, para que tentativas futuras sejam bem sucedidas. Objetivo: comparar os protocolos utilizando agonista ou antagonista do GnRH para estimulação ovariana em pacientes normo-respondedoras submetidas ao primeiro ciclo de FIV/ICSI. Métodos: foi realizada uma revisão da literatura sobre a história da indução da ovulação controlada por medicamentos. A partir dos dados disponíveis no banco de prontuários eletrônicos SISFERT utilizado pelo Laboratório de Reprodução Humana (LabRep–HC–FM–UFG), um estudo observacional retrospectivo comparativo foi conduzido com 50 pacientes distribuídas em dois grupos de acordo com o protocolo: GnRH-agonista (acetato de leuprolide 1 mg/dia protocolo curto) ou GnRH-antagonista (cetrorelix 0,25 mg/dia); e que receberam 150 UI/dia de rFSH (alfa-folitropina) e 250 µg de rhCG (alfa-coriogonadotrofina) em ambos os grupos. Resultados: foram observadas diferenças estatisticamente significativas nos dias de estimulação com rFSH, dose total de gonadotrofina, dias de uso do GnRH, dose total de GnRH e o número de folículos (≥ 16 mm) no dia do rhCG no grupo GnRH-agonista. Não houve diferença significativa nos outros parâmetros, no entanto, o número de oócitos recuperados foi ligeiramente maior no grupo GnRH-agonista, mas a taxa de fertilização foi maior no grupo GnRH-antagonista. As taxas de gravidez química e clínica foram similares nos dois grupos. Conclusões: embora não tenha havido diferenças significativas nos resultados analisados, o uso do protocolo flexível com antagonista facilita a manipulação pela paciente usuária e possibilita doses menores tanto de gonadotrofinas quanto do próprio antagonista, reduzindo o custo do tratamento quando comparado ao protocolo com agonista do GnRH
Castillo, Farfán Juan Carlos. "Ciclos de fecundación in vitro y maduración final con agonista GNRH: Explorando dosis bajas de HCG para soporte de fase lutea." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de València, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/52180.
Full textHuman gonadotropin chorionic hormone (hCG) is widely used to induce final follicular maturation in in vitro fertilization cycles (IVF). However, its use is closely related to Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS) genesis, especially when certain risk factors are present, mainly a high number of recruited follicles. This risk may be drastically reduced, substituting hCG by a GnRH agonist for triggering in GnRH antagonist cycles. Nonetheless, this protocol is linked to high rates of early pregnancy loss due to a deficient luteal phase. Corpus luteum function is seriously compromised when a GnRH agonist is used for triggering (luteolysis), however, the potent luteotrophic action of hCG may be of benefit if low doses are employed for supplementing luteal phase, without increasing OHSS risk. In an effort to reduce early pregnancy losses associated to the use of GnRH agonist for triggering, this PhD. Thesis focuses on the use of low doses of hCG as luteal phase support with the aim of rescue corpus luteum function, normalizing pregnancy and on-going pregnancy rates; and at the same time reducing the frequency of OHSS in high responders to ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles.
Lavorato, Heloisa Lopes [UNESP]. "Agonista versus antagonista do GnRH em ciclos de reprodução assistida: DNA fragmentação e apoptose das células da granulosa." Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/99222.
Full textCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Os agonistas do hormônio liberador de gonadotrofina (Gonadotropin-releasing hormone / GnRH) foram introduzidos na estimulação ovariana para fertilização in-vitro (FIV) com o objetivo de evitar o pico prematuro do hormônio luteinizante (LH). Embora sejam acompanhados de algumas desvantagens, os agonistas do GnRH tornaram-se bem aceitos na prática clínica com sua utilização sendo associada a aumento das taxas de gravidez. O desenvolvimento dos antagonistas do GnRH, capazes de bloqueio imediato da hipófise ofereceu uma nova opção terapêutica. Estudos comparativos entre os dois análogos têm sugerido que o uso de antagonistas está associado a uma menor duração do estímulo ovulatório e uma diminuição da incidência de síndrome de hiperestimulação ovariana, enquanto as taxas de gravidez e de nascidos vivos não parecem sofrer influências significativas do tipo de análogo do GnRH utilizado. Por outro lado, os agonistas do GnRH apresentam outras aplicações em ciclos de reprodução assistida além do bloqueio hipofisário
The expression of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor has been demonstrated in the human ovary, and it has therefore been suggested that GnRH agonists have different effects on the intraovarian system compared with GnRH antagonists, particularly in the granulosa cell (GC) layer. This study aimed to compare the level of apoptosis and DNA fragmentation in human GCs exposed to agonist or antagonist of GnRH in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles supplemented with recombinant LH (r-LH). Patients without ovulatory dysfunction aged ≤ 37 years and in the first ICSI cycle were prospectively randomised to receive either a long GnRH agonist protocol or a multi-dose antagonist protocol. In both groups, the GCs were collected during oocyte denudation and separated from blood cells by centrifugation on a 60% isolate solution. It should be emphasized that the study examined only GCs that had been directly detached from the oocyte cumulus complexes. The GCs were then analyzed for DNA fragmentation by TUNEL assay and for apoptosis using annexin-V. The primary outcome measurements were given as the percentage of GCs with DNA fragmentation and apoptosis out of the total number of GCs analyzed. The comparison of the agonist versus the antagonist group was performed using the Mann-Whitney test
Lavorato, Heloisa Lopes. "Agonista versus antagonista do GnRH em ciclos de reprodução assistida : DNA fragmentação e apoptose das células da granulosa /." Botucatu : [s.n.], 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/99222.
Full textCoorientador: Mario Cavagna
Banca: João Batista Alcantara Oliveira
Banca: Claudia Guilhermino Petersen
Resumo: Os agonistas do hormônio liberador de gonadotrofina (Gonadotropin-releasing hormone / GnRH) foram introduzidos na estimulação ovariana para fertilização in-vitro (FIV) com o objetivo de evitar o pico prematuro do hormônio luteinizante (LH). Embora sejam acompanhados de algumas desvantagens, os agonistas do GnRH tornaram-se bem aceitos na prática clínica com sua utilização sendo associada a aumento das taxas de gravidez. O desenvolvimento dos antagonistas do GnRH, capazes de bloqueio imediato da hipófise ofereceu uma nova opção terapêutica. Estudos comparativos entre os dois análogos têm sugerido que o uso de antagonistas está associado a uma menor duração do estímulo ovulatório e uma diminuição da incidência de síndrome de hiperestimulação ovariana, enquanto as taxas de gravidez e de nascidos vivos não parecem sofrer influências significativas do tipo de análogo do GnRH utilizado. Por outro lado, os agonistas do GnRH apresentam outras aplicações em ciclos de reprodução assistida além do bloqueio hipofisário
Abstract: The expression of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor has been demonstrated in the human ovary, and it has therefore been suggested that GnRH agonists have different effects on the intraovarian system compared with GnRH antagonists, particularly in the granulosa cell (GC) layer. This study aimed to compare the level of apoptosis and DNA fragmentation in human GCs exposed to agonist or antagonist of GnRH in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles supplemented with recombinant LH (r-LH). Patients without ovulatory dysfunction aged ≤ 37 years and in the first ICSI cycle were prospectively randomised to receive either a long GnRH agonist protocol or a multi-dose antagonist protocol. In both groups, the GCs were collected during oocyte denudation and separated from blood cells by centrifugation on a 60% isolate solution. It should be emphasized that the study examined only GCs that had been directly detached from the oocyte cumulus complexes. The GCs were then analyzed for DNA fragmentation by TUNEL assay and for apoptosis using annexin-V. The primary outcome measurements were given as the percentage of GCs with DNA fragmentation and apoptosis out of the total number of GCs analyzed. The comparison of the agonist versus the antagonist group was performed using the Mann-Whitney test
Mestre
Terres, Letícia Funchal. "Homogenização da coorte folicular pela administração de estradiol em ciclos de estimulação ovariana controlada com antagonista de GnRH protocolo de doses múltiplas." reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/5361.
Full textHempelt, Daniela. "Analytische Untersuchungen zur Aggregation von Cetrorelix und weiteren GnRH-Antagonisten." Doctoral thesis, Saechsische Landesbibliothek- Staats- und Universitaetsbibliothek Dresden, 2012. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-99807.
Full textDUBOURDIEU, SOPHIE. "Effets de l'administration d'un antagoniste de la gnrh chez la femme normale." Nantes, 1989. http://www.theses.fr/1989NANT094M.
Full textJohansson, Johanna. "GnRH-antagonisten Elagolix effekter och biverkningar vid behandling av endometriosutlöst smärta." Thesis, Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för kemi och biomedicin (KOB), 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-93676.
Full textBackground: Endometriosis is a chronic benign estrogen-dependent disease characterized by the growth of endometrial tissue outside the uterus. The disease is associated with severe pain. The purpose of all available treatment is to reduce the symptoms and relieve the pain. Today, affected women are offered combined hormonal contraceptives, progestogens or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, in combination with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and paracetamol. Another possible treatment for endometriosis is the GnRH-antagonist Elagolix. The drug blocks the GnRH-receptor, which leads to inhibited release of luteinizing hormone (LH) and folliclestimulating hormone (FSH). Thereby reducing the release of the sex hormone estrogen. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects and side effects of GnRH antagonist Elagolix for treatment of endometriosis-triggered pain. Method: This work is a literature review based on randomized controlled scientific articles (RCTs), which were retrieved from the medical database PubMed.Gov. The article search was performed by using two keywords, namely “endometriosis” and “elagolix”, and resulted in a total of five articles to investigate. Results: The results showed that Elagolix immediately blocks the GnRH receptors regardless of dosage. In response, the levels of LH and FSH are reduced, and thereby reducing estrogen release. FSH levels decrease more slowly than LH. Higher dosage lowers LH levels over a longer period of time. The time to maximum concentration (Tmax) is reached within 0,5-1 hour. The optimal dose of Elagolix for treatment of endometriosis-associated pain is 150 mg once daily for a maximum of twentyfour months, or 200 mg twice a day for a maximum of six months. Treatment with Elagolix leads to bone mineral density (BMD) loss. Increased dosage and duration of treatment lead to increased BMD reduction. Elagolix has a high frequency of adverse events. The adverse events is a result of the low estrogen levels. Conclusion: The conclusion of this study imply that Elagolix reduces estrogen release and thereby reduces endometriosis-associated pain. Elagolix should only be used as treatment for a maxiumum of twenty-four months due to BMD loss. The studies around Elagolix are few, and all studies are funded by pharmaceutical companies that participated in the development of the drug. Further studies are needed with an objective point of view.
Books on the topic "Antagonista GnRH"
Organon Round Table Conference (3rd 1992 Paris, France). GnRH, GnRH analogs, gonadotropins, and gonadal peptides: The proceedings of the third Organon Round Table Conference, Paris, 1992. Parthenon Pub. Group, 1993.
Recent progress on GnRH and gonadal peptides. Elsevier, 1990.
P, Bouchard, Ipsen-Biotech, and International Symposium on GnRH, GnRH Analogs, and Gonadal Peptides (1989 : Paris, France), eds. Recent progress on GnRH and gonadal peptides: Proceedings of the international symposium, Paris, 16-17 September 1989. Elsevier, 1990.
Book chapters on the topic "Antagonista GnRH"
Flores, Francisco Javier Ruiz, and Juan Antonio García Velasco. "GnRH Antagonist Protocols." In Textbook of Assisted Reproduction. Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2377-9_10.
Full textPavlou, Spyros N. "GnRH Antagonists in Men." In Modes of Action of GnRH and GnRH Analogs. Springer New York, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2916-2_19.
Full textGordon, Keith, and Gary D. Hodgen. "Hormone Antagonism for Contraception: GnRH Antagonists and Antiprogestins." In Clinical Perspectives in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Springer New York, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2730-4_18.
Full textGordon, Keith, Douglas R. Danforth, Robert F. Williams, and Gary D. Hodgen. "GnRH Antagonists: Primate Models for Clinical Indications." In Modes of Action of GnRH and GnRH Analogs. Springer New York, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2916-2_22.
Full textHall, Janet E., and William F. Crowley. "Use of GnRH Antagonists as Physiologic Probes in the Female." In Modes of Action of GnRH and GnRH Analogs. Springer New York, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2916-2_20.
Full textKarten, Marvin J. "An Overview of GnRH Antagonist Development: Two Decades of Progress." In Modes of Action of GnRH and GnRH Analogs. Springer New York, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2916-2_18.
Full textBremner, William J., Carrie J. Bagatell, and Robert A. Steiner. "Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Plus Testosterone: A Potential Male Contraceptive." In Modes of Action of GnRH and GnRH Analogs. Springer New York, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2916-2_21.
Full textHahn, D. W., K. T. Demarest, A. Phillips, et al. "Contraceptive Potential of GnRH Antagonists." In Female Contraception. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73790-9_16.
Full textKhalaf, Yacoub, and Sesh Kamal Sunkara. "GnRH Antagonist in Ovarian Stimulation." In Principles and Practice of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in ART. Springer India, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1686-5_10.
Full textPavlou, Spyros N., Jean Rivier, Wylie Vale, and Themis Kamilaris. "Clinical Pharmacology of LHRH Antagonists." In GnRH Analogues in Cancer and Human Reproduction. Springer Netherlands, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0725-6_13.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Antagonista GnRH"
Engel, J., A. Schreiber, S. Seitz, et al. "Triple-Negative Breast Cancers Express Receptors for GnRH and Can Be Effectively Targeted by the Orally Active GnRH-Antagonist AEZS 115." In Abstracts: Thirty-Second Annual CTRC‐AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium‐‐ Dec 10‐13, 2009; San Antonio, TX. American Association for Cancer Research, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-09-6108.
Full textEngel, JB, M. Ivanisevic, E. Guenther, J. Dietl, U. Kaemmerer, and A. Hoenig. "Orally active gnRH-antagonist AEZS-115 inhibits growth of human ovarian and breast cancers in vitro." In CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2008 Abstracts. American Association for Cancer Research, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-3065.
Full textCucchiara, Vito, Joy C. Yang, Chengfei Liu, et al. "Abstract 1018: GnRH antagonists have direct inhibitory effects on castration-resistant prostate cancer via intracrine androgen and AR-V7 expression." In Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2019; March 29-April 3, 2019; Atlanta, GA. American Association for Cancer Research, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-1018.
Full textCucchiara, Vito, Joy C. Yang, Chengfei Liu, et al. "Abstract 1018: GnRH antagonists have direct inhibitory effects on castration-resistant prostate cancer via intracrine androgen and AR-V7 expression." In Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2019; March 29-April 3, 2019; Atlanta, GA. American Association for Cancer Research, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-1018.
Full text