Dissertations / Theses on the topic 'Appeals in civil proceedings'

Rule 31.22 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 provides, as a general rule, that those who receive documents through disclosure during civil proceedings may use them only for the purpose of the proceedings at hand. The general rule is subject to three exceptions, and judges have discretion to authorise subsequent use for other purposes. However, the foundational presupposition underpinning CPR 31.22 is that subsequent use, generally speaking, is improper. The thesis has two primary aims: (1) to demonstrate that the rule governing subsequent use (as developed in the case law) is theoretically and practically flawed, and that maintaining a blanket, general rule against subsequent use is unsound in principle, unjust, and procedurally inefficient; and (2) to generate a normative and procedural framework suitable for reform. Part I outlines the content, origins and operation of CPR 31.22. Through historical analysis, it suggests that presumptively categorising as improper all forms of subsequent use beyond the original litigation contradicts traditional authority. By identifying and examining the three principal rationales said to justify the modern rule, it argues that none affords sound justification. By analysing the exceptions to the rule, including judicial discretion, it seeks to show that such measures are incapable of remedying the defects in the underlying rule. Part II attempts to formulate a theoretically defensible, procedurally viable model for reforming CPR 31.22. It suggests that the presumption against subsequent use should be abolished, and the law reoriented around two central norms: the harm principle and a balancing approach. It tests this theoretical model by applying it to seven paradigmatic categories of subsequent use. Finally, it outlines a possible structure for procedural reform.

Purpose: The primary purpose for this research was to evaluate the quality of psycholegal reports, and the qualification of the authors. Previous research had revealed generalised poor practices in psycholegal report writing and the authors seemed unqualified as expert witness. This negatively influenced the impression and usefulness of expert psychological opinion in South African courts. The secondary purpose was to compare the results to those determined by Ireland (2012), which was a useful benchmark study in the UK as her findings corresponded with the literature. Method: This archival research analysed a hand-search sample of 20 reports written by 20 psychologists based nationally. These reports were submitted as expert opinion in civil proceedings in the Grahamstown Division of the Eastern Cape High Court between 2011 and 2016. Ireland and Pinschof’s (2009) measure ‘Quality Rating Scale’ was adapted for a South African context and used to evaluate quantitatively the reports. Focus was on the reports’ contents (fact and opinion), methods, process and overall rating, and the qualification of the authors. Results: Overall, two-thirds of the reports were rated as ‘good’ and ‘very good’. The results were generally more positive than Ireland’s (2012) findings. However, there were practices in the report writing that were deemed detrimental to the quality of the expert’s opinion. This included vague referral questions and unclear basis for concluding opinions and diagnosis. There was also a lack of discussions surrounding the scientific trustworthiness of testing methods and absent ethical considerations. Lastly, the specialised expertise of the experts was not adequately documented. Conclusion: The findings painted a more positive picture of psycholegal reporting in South Africa than illustrated in previous research, which seemingly relied on anecdotes and subjective surveys. This study used a systematic and objective measure. The findings of this study, previous research and ethical Rules of Conduct were used to consider recommendations for psycholegal report writing, and the improvement of the field of psycholegal work. Lastly, the focus of future research was discussed.

Over the past few decades, globalisation, international trade, cross-border investments, travel, and economic and personal relationships between citizens of different countries have had a profound impact on law. An increase in international relationships is inevitably followed by a growth in international and cross-border litigation. Therefore, several initiatives have been launched with the aim of unifying, harmonising, and internationalising civil procedure. Today, the international harmonisation of civil procedure is mainly achieved through soft law instruments, such as the numerous Hague Conventions dedicated to this legal field and the ALI/UNIDROIT Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure. Moreover, in the European Union, harmonisation of civil procedure has reached even more advanced levels across member states. Any party who becomes involved in an international or cross-border dispute naturally needs to understand what is happening around them. Hence, translation is attributed a major role in international civil procedure. This paper will look at translation in civil proceedings, with particular regard to international and transnational disputes which fall under the Italian jurisdiction¬. Its purpose is twofold: 1) the first aim is to propose a potential resource which could facilitate translation in Italian civil proceedings, i.e. multilingual civil court document templates; 2) the second aim is to raise awareness on the importance of translation in international and cross-border disputes and highlight the peculiarities which characterise this particular type of translation and differentiate it from other areas of both general and legal translation. Chapter 1 offers an overview of Italian civil proceedings. Chapter 2 is dedicated to legal translation. Chapter 3 focuses on Italian civil court documents and the use of templates in Italian proceedings. Finally, Chapter 4 presents the German and English translations of six Italian sample templates.

Ukraine is in the process of reforming its legislation to build an effective justice system. Only one activity of the court is not able to ensure the high quality of justice in the conditions of the dishonesty of other participants in the trial. Besides, at the present stage, in terms of simplified conditions for the movement of persons between states are growing, the number of cases that are considered with the participation of a foreign element, the prosecution of which has its own characteristics. Consequently, the reforms of the legislative level have to take into account such features. At the same time, the improvement of legislation requires the creation of effective mechanisms for its implementation. An important guarantee of ensuring the quality of judicial proceedings is the reliability of the information provided by participants in civil proceedings during the consideration of a civil case. The guarantee of which is the possibility of applying criminal liability under Article 384 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, for misleading into the court, including to a foreigner or a stateless person. In the implementation of this type of liability provisions, several objectively determined general problems need to be solved in practice

This thesis discusses Scottish rules of civil procedure and the United States Federal rules of Civil Procedure relating to four mechanisms of adding new parties to the pending action in the light of certain basic interests. These devices are intervention, third party procedure, interpleader by way of counterclaim and, joinder of parties. The thesis aims to accomplish two basic objectives as follows. First, to identify whether coherence exists between Scottish and the United States Federal laws in respect of the procedural rules which regulate the process of adding new party to civil action. Second, on the basis of identifying whether there is coherence between Scottish and Federal rules underlying the rules for inclusion of additional parties, it aims to study these rules and criteria in the light of three vital interests which are involved in any case when a new party is added to the pending action; the interest of the absentee, the interest of the original parties, and the public interest. Mainly, this thesis addresses the question as to what extent the Scottish and Federal rules of civil procedure accord respect to the above-mentioned interests. There appears to be no existing comprehensive legal and theoretical evaluation that addresses the question as to whether the Scottish and the United States Federal rules for admitting additional parties further or inhibit the proposed balance between the above-mentioned interests appropriately. In addition, the very few comparative studies which address questions of civil procedure in general and comparative procedural law between Scottish and the United States Federal rules in particular, provide an additional backdrop to this research. It is argued that, for the most part, Scottish rules accord respect to the proposed balance of interests to a greater extent than does Federal rules of additional parties. The reasons that Federal rules of additional parties do not accord sufficient respect to the proposed balance of interests as outlined throughout this thesis are due to the following: (i) the categorization of intervention into two lands; intervention of right and permissive intervention (ii) The non-availability of third party procedure for a defender against some one who is liable to a pursuer (iii) Adopting a long process to assert third party procedure against some one who is already a party to the action, (iv) Permitting a defender to assert a remedy of interpleader against the original pursuer and non-parties in the original action which may extend the scope of the original action to include ancillary issues. However, it was argued that in relation to the mechanism "joinder of parties" and for the most part, both Scottish and the United States Federal rules intend to protect similar interests that have been already protected by other procedural vehicles. It is argued that this trend causes particular difficulties such as producing an overlap between the process of adding new parties and may result in anomalous results by giving the same matter different meanings.

Медіація являє собою самостійний спосіб врегулювання юридичних спорів, що представляє собою організовану процедуру переговорів за участю медіатора, так званого нейтрального посередника, який сприяє сторонам у здійсненні переговорів між сторонами та прийняття рішення.

O presente trabalho objetiva estudar sobretudo a valorização dos precedentes no processo civil brasileiro, com especial atenção para os mecanismos indutores da criação de precedentes, observando se há benefícios para a efetividade da tutela jurisdicional. São traçados breves contornos do que constitui um precedente judicial, da ratio decidendi e dos obiter dicta, dos precedentes verticais e horizontais, bem como da classificação das normas segunda sua abstração e generalidade e, por fim, da teoria econômica dos precedentes. Depois, se estudam os principais mecanismos de valorização dos precedentes encontrados no processo civil brasileiro vigente, sobretudo no Código de Processo Civil de 1973 (CPC-73). A seguir, a valorização dos precedentes é estudada do ponto de vista dos conflitos repetitivos, a relação entre demandas que veiculam questões repetitivas, e como isso afeta a indução da criação de precedentes. Ao final, estuda-se com maior atenção o incidente de resolução de demandas repetitivas, previsto no Anteprojeto de Novo Código de Processo Civil, sua origem, institutos similares de outros países e, ainda, eventuais dificuldades ou sugestões de alteração indicadas pelo direito comparado. Conclui-se o trabalho, então, tecendo-se alguns comentários a respeito de como as técnicas de valorização dos precedentes, que induzem a criação de precedentes (como o incidente estudado) poderiam melhor atender ao fim colimado, que é a efetividade da tutela jurisdicional<br>This work aims mainly at the study of the valorization of precedents in Brazilian civil procedure, with special attention to the precedent creation mechanisms, observing if there are benefits for a more effective adjudication (in lieu of the scopes of the jurisdiction). We streamline the main contours of a judicial precedent, its ratio decidendi and obiter dictum, the vertical and horizontal precedents, as well as the classifcation of legal rules according to their abstraction and generality and, at last, the economical theory of precedents. Then, we study the main mechanisms of valorizing precedents in Brazilian civil procedure in force, especially in the Civil Procedure Code of 1973 (CPC-73). Following that line of thought, the valorization of precedents is seen from the viewpoint of the repetitive litigation, the relation between repetitive lawsuits, and then how it afects the inducement of precedent creation. Afterwards, the attention is focused on the to-be-created incident of resolution of repetitive lawsuits (as of the Draft of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code), its origins, similar mechanisms of other countries, and possible difficulties or recommendations inspired by the foreign law for amendment of the draft. Lastly, the work is closed by shedding some light on how the techniques for valorization of precedents could better serve the aim collimated, which is the effectiveness of jurisdictional protection.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:29:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Monica Bonetti Couto.pdf: 2749130 bytes, checksum: b38f215b3649895dd342b51f451821e9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-08-11<br>The core of this work is to analyze the institute of the "general repercussion", brought into the Brazilian law system by the Constitutional Ammendment nº 45/2004, under the civil procedure law standpoint, and especially its effects on the Appeals to the Supreme Court (suitability, filing and processing). The objective is to depict the impact of the "general repercussion" into the Brazilian political-legal order, taking into account the crucial function of the Appeals to the Supreme Court, which watches over the Constitution. In order to accomplish this task, both historic and comparative data were used along with the study of foreign laws, which demonstrated to be a strong source to help understand the intitute. The origins and foundations of the Appeals to the Supreme Court were also scrutinized in order to achieve the explanation and the true need of mandatory filters - such as the "general repercussion" -, so that the Supreme Court can ultimately perform its proper functions<br>O objetivo central deste trabalho é o de analisar o instituto da repercussão geral, introduzido no sistema brasileiro pela Emenda Constitucional nº 45, de 2004, sob a ótica do direito processual civil, especialmente os seus reflexos no âmbito do recurso extraordinário (cabimento, interposição e processamento). Busca-se, neste passo, examinar o impacto da instituição da repercussão geral na ordem político-jurídica brasileira, em face da elevada função que compete ao recurso extraordinário, no âmbito do Supremo Tribunal Federal, guardião da Constituição. Procurando cumprir esta tarefa, servimo-nos de dados históricos e comparativos, com aporte de direito estrangeiro, fonte segura a auxiliar o intérprete na compreensão o novo instituto. Buscou-se no fundamento do recurso extraordinário a explicação e evidência da imperiosidade da instituição de filtros, como a repercussão geral, permitindo ao Supremo Tribunal Federal realizar a função que lhe compete

This thesis addresses the problem of the privilege against self-incrimination ("the privilege") in civil proceedings between private parties in Australia and New Zealand. This problem has been recognised by judges, law reform bodies and legislators in both countries for twenty years. However, the legislative response has been inadequate. The privilege is easily confused with other related concepts, particularly the right to silence in criminal proceedings. The reasons for the privilege in civil proceedings are not necessarily the same as for the right to silence. Care is therefore taken to define the terminology and scope of the thesis. It sets out the modern law on the privilege in civil proceedings between private parties. It describes how the privilege causes particular problems in those proceedings. It surveys the literature, finding that most of it concerns the right to silence. The thesis draws heavily on the history of the privilege. It argues that, although witness privilege came from the common law, the privilege in interlocutory civil proceedings had its origins in the discretionary remedies devised by the courts of equity. They were sensitive to abuse of their remedies. For the same reason, modern prosecutors should not be encouraged to rely excessively upon evidence acquired through compulsory powers. Derivative use immunity is one of several substitutes suggested for the privilege. The thesis looks at the various substitutes. It concludes that derivative use immunity is the only satisfactory substitute for the privilege in civil proceedings. Derivative use immunity originated in the United States. The thesis looks closely at the American experience. The history and scope of the Fifth Amendment are discussed in detail, particularly the supposed removal of its protection from documents. This will show that the removal of the privilege from documents is not as simple as law reform bodies in Australia and New Zealand suggest. Exaggerated claims have been made by Australian prosecutors about the problems caused by derivative use immunity. The claims are examined in the light of American case-law. This shows that an impossible burden is not imposed on prosecutors. The same point emerges when the thesis examines the operation of derivative use immunity under Australian certification procedures since 1995. Particular procedural and legislative difficulties need to be addressed, particularly when derivative use immunity replaces the privilege in interlocutory proceedings. However, certification by the court has an important advantage. The court�s exercise of its discretion provides the flexibility which automatic statutory immunity lacks. The question in the title is therefore answered in the affirmative. Derivative use immunity under a statutory certification procedure can provide the answer. Cooperation between the Commonwealth and States may be needed to overcome constitutional difficulties, but most other problems can be overcome if derivative use immunity is given a sound statutory basis.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:24:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Rodrigo Voltarelli de Carvalho.pdf: 840399 bytes, checksum: 3a6406a167947645f307d3e787b7f4be (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-02-15<br>To any person (natural or legal) exercise their right of action, which is guaranteed by the 1998 s Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, it is essential that the person fulfill several requirements (conditions of action and procedural assumptions of existence and validity). Failing to do so, that person s conflict will not even be examined by the Judiciary. The same logical reasoning applies to the one who aims to appeal a certain decision: the one who feels aggrieved by any given decision has to fulfill another series of requirements to have its appeal accepted, processed and judge by the Court. This paper studies those requirements that one of the litigants needs to fulfill in order to have its appeal accepted, processed and judge, notoriously known as appeal s admissibility requirements. Centrally, the issues discussed in this paper are those concerning (i) the analysis of the appeal s admissibility requirements expressly set forth in the New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code, (ii) the proper way to fulfill these admissibility requirements, and (iii) the consequences of not fulfilling them when filing an appeal. Therefore, it is necessary the greening of the New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code in the present scenario of Procedure Law in Brazil and identification of those admissibility requirements. Once identified, it will be answered the question about the effects of absence of one of those admissibility requirements, systematizing them in this regard. In early conclusion, it will be noted that the timely filing of an appeal is at the top of the hierarchy of admissibility requirements since it is incurable and since the absence of almost any other of these requirements can be amended<br>Para que qualquer pessoa (física ou jurídica) possa exercer seu direito de ação, direito este garantido pela Constituição Federal da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988, é necessário que essa pessoa preencha uma série de requisitos (condições da ação e pressupostos processuais de existência e validade). Caso não o faça, o conflito dessa pessoa nem sequer será examinado pelo Poder Judiciário. O mesmo raciocínio lógico é aplicável àquela parte da relação jurídica processual que pretende recorrer de determinada decisão: faz-se mister que a parte que se sinta prejudicada por determinada decisão judicial preencha outra série de requisitos para que o seu recurso seja admitido, processado e julgado pelo Tribunal ao qual for direcionado. O presente estudo trata exata e especificamente desses requisitos necessários para o conhecimento, processamento e julgamento dos recursos, notoriamente conhecidos como requisitos de admissibilidade recursal. Centralmente, as questões debatidas por este trabalho são aquelas relativas (i) à análise dos requisitos de admissibilidade recursal expressamente previstos no novo Código de Processo Civil, (ii) à forma adequada de preencher esses requisitos de admissibilidade, e (iii) às consequências que serão suportadas pela parte recorrente em razão de eventual falta de um ou mais dos requisitos de admissibilidade no recurso interposto. Faz-se necessário, pois, a ambientalização do Novo Código de Processo Civil no cenário atual do Direito Processual no Brasil mormente à luz dos princípios e argumentos motivadores para seu debate, edição e sanção e a identificação dos requisitos de admissibilidade recursal. Depois de identificados, buscar-se-á resposta à pergunta acerca dos efeitos da eventual ausência de um dos requisitos de admissibilidade recursal identificados, sistematizando-os sob esse aspecto. Em adiantada conclusão, observarse- á que o legislador ordinário infraconstitucional alçou a tempestividade ao topo da hierarquia dos requisitos de admissibilidade vez que insanável e optou por tratar o vício em quase todos os outros requisitos de admissibilidade como sanáveis

Цивільний процес, після оприлюднення Закону України «Про внесення змін до Господарського процесуального кодексу України, Цивільного процесуального кодексу України, Кодексу адміністративного судочинства України та інших законодавчих актів» від 03.10.2017 р., набув дещо нового вигляду та містить новели, які ще не були застосовані судами [1]. Тут важливе точне трактування процедури цих змін, а також ретельна підготовка до їх впровадження. Одна з новел – це упровадження спрощеного позовного провадження. Законодавець наголошує, що введення такого провадження певним чином забезпечить доступ до правосуддя за рахунок зменшення судових витрат, та буде вирізнятися гнучкістю такої процедури. Більше того, слугуватиме значній ефективності судової адміністрації та зменшить витрати на судову систему.

Поняття «електронні докази» набуло свого поширення у 70-х роках минулого століття. Це безпосередньо було пов‘язано з виникненням так званих «машинних документів», які на той час ототожнювались з письмовими доказами, оскільки мало чим відрізнялися від звичайних документів, надрукованих на папері. Відтоді «машинні документи» перестали бути виключно текстовими. На сьогоднішній день електронні носії можуть містити в собі найрізноманітнішу інформацію. Приміром, це може бути графічна, звукова, аудіовізуальна, власне текстова інформація, а також будь-яке їх поєднання.

Розвиток комунікаційних та інформаційних технологій зумовив появу електронних судів. Так у Сінгапурі діє Система електронної подачі документів (Electronic Filing System), котра з 2000 р. є обов‘язковою при подачі документів у цивільних справах; Інтегрована електронна система цивільних позовів (Integrated Electronic Litigation System).

Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2018-01-22T11:34:25Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Rodrigo Lucas da Silva Pereira da Gama Alves.pdf: 1005971 bytes, checksum: 703910354b6d38c372bcf94d50e23665 (MD5)<br>Made available in DSpace on 2018-01-22T11:34:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Rodrigo Lucas da Silva Pereira da Gama Alves.pdf: 1005971 bytes, checksum: 703910354b6d38c372bcf94d50e23665 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-12-19<br>The present work is dedicated to the presentation of an attempt to systematize the Brazilian appeal system instituted by the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015. This is because the new law does not discipline the appeal plan according to the content of judicial decision-making. Therefore, there are equal situations in substance that have been disciplined differently by the legislator, a fact that leads to a situation that violates the isonomy and the legal process. Suffice is to imagine that the legislator did two little alterations, but that had a great impact on the system. The first alteration was to establish a criterion to define the sentence, i.e., observing the content of the pronouncement and its purpose, that is, whether or not a phase that takes to the procedure end. From that point on, it conferred on the decisions a nature of interlocutory decision. In another aspect, it also allowed a partial retention of merit, in the cases of requests made in cumulation. The Code also maintained the principle of correspondence to the establishment that is the appropriate appeal against the sentence, it is an appeal and against an interlocutory decision and interlocutory appeal. However, in disciplining the legal regime of the grievance, there was not the necessary adequacy so that the appeal could in fact challenge the decisions of merit, insofar as the original discipline of the resource was maintained as if it existed, for to attack incidental decisions without regard to the merits of the case. Moreover, the entire recursal system is based on the sentence, as if this is the only pronunciation capable of resolving a pretension of the parties, but, of course, the interlocutory decision can also resolve the merits. Thus, our investigation will go through the nature of judicial decision-making, appeals and at the and the final, it will purpose that these institutes are interpreted according to the Federal Constitution, in order that we can adapt the recursal system in an isonomic way and in attention to the legal process<br>O presente trabalho se dedica em apresentar uma tentativa de sistematização do sistema recursal brasileiro instituído pelo Código de Processo Civil de 2015. Isto porque a nova lei não disciplinou o plano recursal de acordo com o conteúdo dos pronunciamentos judiciais decisórios. Por isso, há situações iguais em substância que foram disciplinadas de forma absolutamente diferente pelo legislador, fato que leva a uma situação que viola a isonomia e o devido processo legal. Basta imaginarmos que olegislador fez duas alterações pontuais, mas que foram de grande impacto nosistema. A primeira foi estabelecer um duplo critério para definir sentença, ou seja, observando o conteúdo do pronunciamento e a sua finalidade, vale dizer, se encerra ou não uma fase do procedimento. A partir desse ponto, conferiu às demais decisões natureza de decisão interlocutória. Noutra vertente, permitiu, também, a prolação de decisões parciais de mérito, nas hipóteses de pedidos feitos em cumulação. O Código manteve, ainda, o princípio da correspondência ao estabelecer que o recurso cabível contra a sentença é a apelação e contra a decisão interlocutória é o agravo de instrumento. No entanto, ao disciplinar o regime jurídico do agravo de instrumento, não houve a adequação necessária para que o recurso pudesse, de fato, impugnar as decisões de mérito, na medida em que se manteve a disciplina originária do recurso como se existisse, tão somente, para atacar decisões incidentais sem relação com o mérito do processo. Além do mais, todo o sistema recursal é baseado na sentença, como se se esta fosse o único pronunciamento capaz de resolver a pretensão das partes, mas, evidentemente, a decisão interlocutória também pode resolver o mérito. Assim, nossa investigação passará pela natureza dos pronunciamentos judiciais decisórios, dos recursos e, ao final, proporá que esses institutos sejam interpretados conforme a Constituição Federal, a fim de que possamos adequar o sistema recursal de forma isonômica e em atenção ao devido processo legal

Este trabalho trata fundamentalmente da admissibilidade dos julgamentos parciais do mérito e de questões de mérito no sistema processual civil brasileiro, considerando especialmente o modelo constitucional de processo civil, bem como no sistema processual prospectivo previsto no Projeto de Novo Código de Processo Civil, que deve entrar vigor em breve. Com este objetivo, será abordado no início da dissertação o dogma da unidade estrutural da sentença, sua origem, fundamentos e aplicabilidade no processo civil brasileiro, já que esse dogma parece ser o principal óbice que se opõe à realização dos julgamentos parciais. Em seguida, procede-se à análise da natureza dos pronunciamentos judiciais em que se realizam os julgamentos parciais, quando admitidos no CPC/73, para defini-los como decisões interlocutórias de mérito (ou de questões de mérito) ou sentenças parciais e intermediárias. Além disso, pretende-se estabelecer os pressupostos autorizadores dos julgamentos parciais, para que, assim, esses julgamentos sejam realizados de forma eficiente e em prol da efetividade da tutela jurisdicional. Trata-se ainda os julgamentos parciais na arbitragem e suas particularidades decorrentes das disposições específicas da Lei de Arbitragem e das características específicas do processo arbitral. Finalmente, nos capítulos finais deste estudo enfrentam-se os obstáculos que geralmente se colocam à realização dos julgamentos parciais relativamente ao âmbito recursal e à formação da coisa julgada. Para esse fim, são abordados a teoria dos capítulos de sentença, os efeitos dos recursos e, especialmente, a formação gradual da coisa julgada à luz da doutrina, da jurisprudência dos Tribunais Superiores e também do Projeto de Novo Código de Processo Civil.<br>This paper deals essentially with the possibility of rendering partial judgments on the merits and on issues of merits in the Brazilian Civil Procedure, considering especially the constitutional framework of civil procedure, as well as in the prospective procedural system provided by the New Code of Civil Procedure bill, which shall be in force soon. With this goal, the principle of the indivisibility of the award on merits, its origins, its grounds and its applicability to the Brazilian Civil Procedure are addressed in the beginning of the dissertation, as this principle seems to be the main obstacle against the partial judgments. Following this, the nature of the judicial decisions in wich the partial judgments take place when admitted by the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure of 1973 shall be analysed, in order to characterize them either as interlocutory decisions on the merits (or on issues of merits) or as partial and intermediate awards. In addition, there is a focus on clarifying the conditions in which partial judgments can be rendered, in order to carried out in and efficient fashion, and hence contributing to the effectiveness of the judicial relief. Moreover, the partial judgments in arbitration, as well as their particularities arisen from the specific provisions under the Arbitration Act and singular characteristics of arbitral procedure are analysed. The final chapters of this paper face the obstacles associated with appeals and with claim preclusion that are usually posed against the rendering of partial judgments. For this scope, there shall be addressed the theory of chapters of the award, the effects of the appeals, and specially the gradual claim preclusion in view of the scholars opinions, the case law of the Higher Courts, and also under the New Code of Civil Procedure bill.

Orientador: Yvete Flávio da Costa<br>Resumo: A presente pesquisa tem a finalidade de analisar a Tutela da Evidência frente ao novo ordenamento processual civil. Tal instituto faz parte das Tutelas Provisórias, aquelas analisadas a partir de um juízo sumário a fim de se conceder maior eficiência ao processo durante o seu curso. Num primeiro momento necessário um estudo sobre o panorama geral das tutelas provisórias, dando um enfoque na de urgência, a qual demanda a presença dos requisitos da probabilidade do direito e do perigo de dano ou risco ao resultado útil do processo, de forma cumulativa. Feita essa abordagem, concentrar-se-á o estudo nos casos explícitos de tutela da evidência, presentes no rol do art. 311 do Código Processual Civil, estabelecendo-se, ainda, as premissas para a suas diferenças em relação à tutela de urgência, principalmente no tocante à ausência de demonstração do periculum in mora. Por fim, um estudo acerca de hipóteses de tutela evidente fora do rol do art. 311, e até mesmo do CPC/2015 necessita ser feito, pois a legislação processual preconiza algumas situações “especiais” de evidência, em que se concede tutelas, e até mesmo liminares, somente com o fumus boni iuris. Busca-se, portanto, um entendimento sobre o que é um direito evidente e como as novas ferramentas processuais podem contribuir para maior eficiência e celeridade processuais, garantindo-se um mais efetivo acesso à ordem jurídica justa.<br>Mestre

Magister Legum - LLM<br>South Africa, among others, has adopted, and is bound by, the so-called 'rule in Hollington‘ that originated in England in 1943 in Hollington v Hewthorn (hereinafter the 'Hollington case‘). The issue, among others, that the English Appeal Court had to determine in this case was whether a judgement of a criminal court could be used in subsequent civil proceedings to prove the liability of either of the litigants. The Court reached the conclusion that a judgement of a criminal court is just an irrelevant and inadmissible opinion in later civil proceedings. The court adopted the view that had a criminal conviction been admissible evidence in civil proceedings, it would lead to a situation where the defendant would end up challenging the propriety of those convictions. In the light of that, the courts would be faced with a duty to retry the criminal case in the midst of the civil proceedings. Section 17 of the Civil Proceedings Evidence Act (CPEA) provides that a conviction or an acquittal can be proved by the production of a document dully certified by the relevant court that acquitted or convicted the person in question. Furthermore, section 18 of the Supreme Court Act (SuCA) now section 34 of the Superior Courts Act (SupCA) provides that whenever a judgement, among other things, of a court needs to be proved or referred to in any manner a duly certified copy thereof will serve as prima facie evidence thereof. These sections militate against the rule in Hollington in that they allow, or at least should be interpreted in a manner that accords with the allowance of, the admissibility of conviction evidence in later civil law suits.

A doutrina acadêmica pouco cuida do estudo da atuação do advogado no processo civil, especialmente porque o tema produz imediata associação à deontologia da profissão forense ou, alternativamente, a discussão sobre os honorários advocatícios. O presente trabalho foge dessa associação e busca analisar os aspectos da atuação do advogado no processo civil como personagem ativo da condução do processo. Se há pouco tempo lutava-se pela atuação e dinamismo do juiz para o alcance de uma melhor justiça e se, por meio das diversas reformas processuais, buscou-se o aumento da celeridade processual, agora é o momento da valorização do advogado para o aprimoramento desses dois aspectos. O estudo tem por objetivo demonstrar que a valorização da advocacia como entidade indispensável à realização da justiça pode efetivamente contribuir para a melhora do processo civil, fornecendo esteio para obtenção da tão desejada justiça justa e rápida. A tese se divide em três partes: inicialmente há uma releitura dos institutos fundamentais do processo que, sem repetir informações de conhecimento notório, demonstra a possibilidade de realce da ação e da defesa institutos nos quais a participação do advogado se destaca sem, contudo, retirar a jurisdição do centro da teoria processual. Na segunda parte, o termo condução é analisado com viés ampliativo, assentando o entendimento de que, de fato, não cabe somente ao juiz a direção do processo, pois se levada esta idéia ao extremo, somente haveria condução pelo juiz nos sistemas em que vigorasse o case management. Por fim, na última parte, o papel do advogado é colocado em pauta e, durante a exposição, são feitas propostas para o aprimoramento do nosso sistema processual civil. Ainda que algumas das propostas possam ser factíveis apenas quando nosso sistema e nossa sociedade alcançarem um maior grau de maturidade, todas elas partem de pressupostos que podem ser colocados em prática de imediato.<br>The study of the lawyers´ role in civil proceedings is poorly taken by the academic doctrine, especially because the matter in discussion is often associated to the ethics of the profession or, alternatively, to a discussion of the lawyers´ fees. The present study disregards this association and tries to examine aspects of the lawyers´ role in civil process as an active character on the procedure management. Few years ago, the academic studies spent relevant time searching for the amplification on the performance and dynamism of the judge to reach a better justice and, after some changes on the procedure laws with the purposes of accelerating the procedures phases, now is the time for a recovery of the advocacy as a profession, based on which we will be able to improve these two aspects. The purpose of the present study is to demonstrate the enhancement of advocacy, as a vital corporation to achieve justice, and how it can effectively contribute on the improvement of the civil procedure itself, providing grounds for the much desired fair and quick justice achievement. The thesis is divided into three parts: first, there is a reassessment of the fundamental institutes of the process which, without repeating well-known information, demonstrates the ability to highlight the action and the defense - in which the participation of the lawyer stands out - without, however, withdrawing the jurisdiction from the center of the procedural theory. In the second part, the term management (condução) is analyzed with enlarged bias, with the understanding that, in fact, the judge is not the only one responsible for leading the process. The reasoning is that, if this idea is led to the extreme, only in the systems where the case management exists the judge will be able to exclusively lead the process. Finally, the last part, the role of the lawyer is put in the agenda, and during the explanation, proposals are made to improve our system of civil procedure. While some of the proposals may be feasible only when our system and our society achieve a greater degree of maturity, they all start from assumptions that may be put into practice immediately.

The unreasonable length of Italian civil proceedings goes on filling pages of newspapers and magazines. According to some authoritative views, the inefficiency of the civil justice system helps explain why the Italian model legislation on civil proceedings, as well as its academic research, are not as influential on the European scene as they were in the past. It is interesting to note that an opposed thesis has pointed out that the Italian procedurallaw and recent researches in civil proceedings lack a clear, up-to-date, principle-oriented and comprehensive approach towards problems and challenges that contemporary civil justice systems face today. Such an outdated and overly complicated approach might contribute to the inefficiency of the Italian civiljustice system. The Italian Law Journal, which aims to both spread knowledge (and criticism) of the Italian legal system and foster international debate among lawyers of different traditions, may be an appropriate venue for deepening our understanding of the current performance of the Italian civil justice system. Itmay, in particular, assist in ascertaining the major causes of the inefficiencies, with a view to assessing (in a subsequent article) if the prevailing way of thinking of legal scholars may, in the end, exacerbate the relevant problems.<br>La longitud poco razonable de los procesos civiles italianos continúa llenando páginas de periódicos y revistas. De acuerdo con algunas opiniones autorizadas, la ineficiencia del sistema de justicia civil ayuda a explicar el motivo por el cual el modelo italiano de legislación en materia de procedimiento civil, así como su investigación académica, no sean tan influyentes en la escena europea como lo fueron en el pasado. Es interesante notar que una tesis opuesta ha señalado que el derecho procesal italiano y las investigaciones recientes sobre el proceso civil carecen de un enfoque claro, integral, actualizado y orientado por principios sobre los problemas y desafíos que el sistema de justicia civil afronta actualmente. Tal enfoque anticuado y demasiado complicado podría contribuir a la ineficiencia del sistema de justicia civil italiano. El Italian Law Journal, cuyo objetivo es la difusión de conocimiento (y crítica) del sistema legal italiano y la promoción del debate internacional entre abogados de distintas tradiciones, puede ser un modo apropiado para profundizar nuestra comprensión del desempeño actual del sistema de justicia civil italiano. Puede, en particular, ayudar a determinar las principales causas de las ineficiencias con el fin de evaluar (en un artículo posterior) si la forma predominante de pensamiento de los estudiosos del derecho posiblemente, al final, exacerba problemas relevantes.

Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2016-08-11T12:09:32Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Anna Paola de Souza Bonagura.pdf: 1057889 bytes, checksum: a2f0cc12dfd8e8afa1a21e4e00ebaf9d (MD5)<br>Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-11T12:09:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Anna Paola de Souza Bonagura.pdf: 1057889 bytes, checksum: a2f0cc12dfd8e8afa1a21e4e00ebaf9d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-05-12<br>This work aims to study the function of the Superior Court of Justice and Supreme Federal Court and there way of ruling both special and extraordinary appeal to cause the reasoning uniformity of the law. Review of the origins of such Courts. Evolving of legislation regarding such Courts, appeals and correspondent jurisprudence. Focus on STJ and STF regarding the admissibility of such appeals. Considering of relevance reasoning procedure and current “repercussão geral” system. Based on such this work aims to analyze how such Court are developing the so called “jurisprudência defensiva” as filter. In such scenario this work address the innovation promoted by new civil procedural code that discourage the so called “jurisprudência defensive”. It is necessary that the Courts reinforce its own role of creating and interpreting law, achieving decisions consistency, stability, predictability and legal certainty<br>O presente trabalho destina-se a estudar a função do STJ e STF no âmbito dos recursos especial e extraordinário, especialmente no que se refere à uniformização da interpretação do direito objetivo. Revisitaremos as origens destas cortes e a evolução da legislação e da jurisprudência relacionadas ao tema. Daremos destaque às Súmulas do STJ e do STJ que tratam da admissibilidade destes recursos, na técnica da arguição de relevância e à atual sistemática da repercussão geral. Analisaremos a tendência destes tribunais de desenvolverem a chamada jurisprudência defensiva e as inovações trazidas pelo NCPC no que tange ao desestímulo à utilização deste filtro. Concluiremos pela necessidade de fortalecimento dos precedentes criados por estas Cortes

L’idée centrale de notre paradigme juridique est qu’une peine juste devrait être celle qui régénère les liens sociaux blessés par le crime. Si l’édifice de la justice des hommes a connu de nombreuses transformations, les éclairages historiques et philosophiques demeurent indispensables pour étudier la délicate question du sens de la peine. Les sciences criminelles doivent ainsi prendre en compte les intérêts de la société, de l’auteur de l’infraction ainsi que ceux de la victime. En ce sens, la loi du 15 août 2014 relative à l’individualisation des peines et renforçant l’efficacité des sanctions pénales prévoit, pour la première fois en droit positif, un texte consacré à la justice restaurative. L’objet de celle-ci consiste à permettre de restaurer le lien social rompu par la commission d’une infraction en offrant la possibilité à l’auteur des faits de rencontrer la victime. Réparer le préjudice causé à la victime, réinsérer l’auteur de l’infraction dans la société, rétablir la paix sociale et prévenir la récidive : tels sont les objectifs de la justice restaurative. L’étude particulière de l’article 10-1 du Code de procédure pénale soulève pour autant deux questions essentielles : La justice restaurative est-elle envisageable dans le cadre de toute procédure pénale ? La justice restaurative peut-elle trouver sa place à tous les stades de la procédure ? Pour permettre à la réflexion théorique de se nourrir des réalités concrètes, il convient de s’interroger sur les règles de procédure qui pourraient permettre d’encadrer rigoureusement la justice restaurative afin que, débarrassée de l’image utopique dont elle pourrait être affublée, elle puisse devenir un mécanisme juridique efficace<br>The core idea of our legal paradigm is that a fair sentence should be one that regenerates the social links wounded by crime. If the justice built by men has known many transformations, the historical and philosophical enlightenings remain essential to study the tricky question of the « sentence’s meaning ». Thus criminal sciences must take into account the interests of the society, of the offender as much as the victim’s. In this sense, the law of August 15, 2014 on the sentences’ individualization and reinforcing the penal sanctions’ efficiency, provides, for the first time in substantive law, a text dedicated to restorative justice. The purpose of this law consists in allowing to restore the social link broken by the commission of an offense by offering the offender the opportunity to meet the victim. To repair prejudice caused to victims, to reintegrate offenders in the society, to restore social peace and to prevent recidivism : those are the restorative objectives of justice. The particular study of article 10-1 of the Code of criminal proceedings raises two essential issues : is restorative justice possible in any criminal proceedings ? Can restorative justice find its place at each and every stage of the procedure ? In order to allow the theoretical reflexion to feed from practical realities, questions must be asked about the proceedings rules which could help producing a strict framework for restorative justice so that, freed from the utopian image from which restorative justice could be burdened with, it may become an efficient legal mechanism

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:28:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Ricardo Procopio Bandeiras de Melo.pdf: 986521 bytes, checksum: f260392d88cf541853105b759c0a50e2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-02-02<br>This thesis focuses on the study of parties in civil proceedings, in the face of the institutes that revisits the theory of the process, with emphasis on procedural assumptions, aiming to understand some of the different phenomena related to those subject of the proceeding. The entire focus of the theme is based on a conception genuinely procedural of the part. This allows better viewing of several procedural institutes that have generated controversy in its theoretical understanding and practical application, as the representation, assistance, the succession of parties and the exceptional figure of extraordinary legitimacy, in which is contained in the institute of the replacement procedural. The methodology also promotes understanding of various positions that the parties take in relation procedural. Also deals the conduct of the parties, with regard to their duties, burdens and obligation, always taking on the ethics parameter, seeking the effectiveness of court activity<br>Esta dissertação centra-se no estudo das partes no processo civil, em face do que revisita institutos da teoria geral do processo, com ênfase nos pressupostos processuais, objetivando compreender alguns dos diversos fenômenos ligados aos referidos sujeitos do processo. Todo o enfoque do tema tem como fundamento uma concepção genuinamente processual da parte. Isso permite uma melhor visualização de vários institutos processuais que têm gerado controvérsias na sua compreensão teórica e aplicação prática, como a representação, a assistência, a sucessão das partes e a excepcional figura da legitimação extraordinária, na qual está contido o instituto da substituição processual. A metodologia também favorece a compreensão das posições diversas que as partes assumem na relação processual. Aborda-se, ainda, o comportamento das partes, no que toca aos seus deveres, ônus e obrigações, sempre tendo por parâmetro a ética, visando à efetividade da atividade jurisdicional

Purpose: to investigate the current mechanism for appeals against the decision of the competitive selection commissions of economic entities’ heads in the state sector of economy as a type of a public-legal dispute and to express an opinion on the regulation of these relations in Ukraine. Research methods: general-scientific and special-legal methods of scientific knowledge, in particular: system-structural and functional methods, method of observation, method of generalization, methods of analysis and synthesis have been applied. Results: the current normative regulation of the procedure for appeals against the decision of the competitive selection commissions of economic entities’ heads in the state sector of economy as a type of a public-legal dispute has been analyzed and the judicial practice has been assessed. Discussion: there is a significant lack of scientific research on appeals against the decision of the competitive selection commissions of economic entities’ heads in the state sector of economy as a type of a public-legal dispute. This issue has not been considered in many aspects, and various objective indicators have not been taken into account, so the level of research on the theme is low. This is due to the novelty of this theme, as appeals against the decisions of competitive commissions in the public (administrative) process are from the beginning of 2020. Previously, this type of relations was considered only in the context of civil law.

Conforme exposição de motivos do Código de Processo Civil de 2015, um dos fundamentos para sua elaboração foi a de proporcionar maior celeridade e efetividade ao processo. Para concretizar o objetivo almejado, foi adotado o termo tutela de evidência no artigo 311, ampliando as hipóteses de antecipação dos efeitos da tutela jurisdicional, sem, contudo, necessidade de comprovação da urgência. Portanto, o CPC/2015 apresenta um novo arcabouço para as tutelas provisórias, sendo imprescindível seu estudo pelos operadores do direito. Entretanto, a mudança legislativa não possui embasamento estatístico que a justifique. Assim, o presente trabalho tem como pretensão apresentar as premissas teóricas que fundamentaram a criação da tutela de evidência, enfrentando os temas relacionados com ênfase em análise empírica de processos judiciais, verificando se existe separação entre os conceitos encampados pela doutrina e pela prática jurídica.<br>According to the exposition of motives from the Civil Process Code of 2015, one of the fundamentals to its elaboration was to provide celerity and effectiveness to the process. To achieve the intended goal, it was adopted the evidence injunction on article 311, expanding the anticipation hypothesis of the judicial protection effects, without, however, need to prove the urgency. Therefore, the CPC/2015 presents a new framework to the provisory judicial protection, being indispensable its study by the operators of law. However, the legislative change does not possess statistical basement that justifies itself. Thereby, the present work has the pretension to present the theoretical premises that grounded the evidence injunction creation, facing the themes related to emphasis in empirical analysis of judicial processes, checking if there is separation between the concepts emplaced by the doctrine and by the juridical practice.

Наукове дослідження та теоретичний аналіз основоположних засад та керівних ідей цивільного процесуального права, яких прийнято називати принципами цивільного судочинства, є першоосновою для здійснення ефективного та неупередженого правосуддя у цивільних справах. Доцільність теоретичного дослідження сутності принципу диспозитивності як загальновизнаного у процесуальній науці принципу цивільного судочинства пояснюється тим, що він виступає інструментом наукового аналізу здійснення цивільного судочинства.

Thesis (M.A.)--City University of Hong Kong, 2008.<br>Title from PDF t.p. (viewed on Oct. 3, 2008) "City University of Hong Kong, School of Law, LW 6409A Dissertation." Includes bibliographical references (p. 63-65)

O objetivo central do presente trabalho é contribuir para o aprimoramento da aplicação da denunciação da lide, que é instituto valorizado, especialmente porque é modalidade de intervenção de terceiro que se ajusta aos princípios da economia e da celeridade processuais. Além disso, evita decisões contraditórias, facilita o cumprimento de provimentos jurisdicionais e vincula o terceiro à coisa julgada. O instituto já era aplicado no direito romano, mudando radicalmente seus contornos no direito germânico primitivo. As características da denunciação da lide nesses dois sistemas são marcantes e influenciaram as demais legislações. A depender da preferência que se lhe pretenda conferir, o instituto estará mais associado ao caráter de assistência, auxiliando o terceiro na defesa do denunciante, ou de efetividade do processo, resolvendo duas demandas por meio de uma única instrução processual e sentença e possibilitando o reembolso do denunciante no mesmo feito. Pretendeu-se, com esse trabalho, destacar a importância do instituto, que possui traços modernos no direito brasileiro, sendo tratado por disposições de direito processual, de direito material e de direito consumerista. Apesar dessas diversas previsões legais, ainda existem controvérsias e imprecisões, gerando relativa insegurança jurídica, que poderia ser afastada, porém o projeto do novo Código de Processo Civil não as resolveu e, para piorar, suprimiu diversos avanços, tornando o instituto praticamente um desdobramento do chamamento ao processo, em que pesem os requisitos para a aplicação deles serem tecnicamente distintos. A inegável importância histórica da denunciação da lide, sua relevante utilidade e sua riqueza são evidentes, consistindo a modalidade de intervenção de terceiro mais utilizada na prática, o que justifica o estudo detido nesse trabalho.<br>The main goal of this study is to contribute to the improvement of the valued institute of implead, specially because it is a kind of third intervention institute that adjusts itself to the procedure principles of economy and celerity. Furthermore, it avoids contradictory decisions, facilitates the enforcement of judicial decisions and attach a third party to the res judicata. The institute was applied in roman law and changed its basis in earlier german law. Implead characteristics in both mentioned systems were remarkable and had an effect in other legal systems. It can be approached for different angles, or as an institute close to the so called assistência existing in Brazilian law, by which the third party helps on defense of the impleader, or as an instrument to procedure effectiveness, solving two suits by only one proof production and only one decision, and enabling the refund to impleader on the same suit. The intention of this work was to highlight the institutes magnitude, that is found in a modern conception, on procedure, material or consumers Brazilian laws. Despite been provided by law, there are still controversies and inaccuracies, what leads to judicial insecurity, that could be avoided. However, Civil Procedure Codes Project did not solve them, as well has suppressed many advances, making the institute a kind of the so called chamamento ao processo, a kind of invitation to the suit, although their requirements be technically different. The undeniable historical relevance of implead, its utility and value are manifest, and it is the third party proceedings most used, justifying the detailed study in this work

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:22:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DuploGrauJurisdicao.pdf: 987365 bytes, checksum: fb042855b91d01263cb02a03980c7d22 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005-11-28<br>This paper deals with the principle of the appellate jurisdiction, and attempts to construe it from the perspective of the 1988 Federal Constitution, offering as well a critique of recent changes introduced in the Procedural Civil Law Code by statute number 10.352 of December 26th, 2001, specially the ones made in articles 475 and 515. The reason for the choice of the current subject was influenced by the study of Procedural Constitutional Law, which led to an even deeper analysis whose conclusions encompass both Constitutional and Procedural Law. It was precisely the possibility of this remarkably updated interdisciplinary study that made this paper possible. Discussing the full implication and outreach of the appellate jurisdiction principle means to question the very behavior of the State, under the rule of law, in relation to its citizens since such a right prevents them from State arbitrary power and enables the revision and adjudication by a higher court of any matter that has been tried in a court of original jurisdiction. Needless to say that the State is well-known for being the most encompassing defendant in the country. The restrictions brought about on the principle of the appellate jurisdiction by the new statute rekindle the old-time debate, which has inflamed so many scholars around the world, over how to reconcile judicial predictability and procedural celerity, which aims at an effective judicial protection. In order to properly answer whether the changes brought about by statute 10.352/01 are constitutional or not, it was necessary to follow a long path of document and bibliography research which included the study of principles in general, above all the constitutional principles with special focus on the definition and outreach of the appellate jurisdiction principle. It also involved analyzing and establishing relationship between that principle and the existing Appeals, as well as the constitutional exam of the mandatory review law, its legal exceptions that represent a limit or a suppression of the aforementioned guarantee. Based on this study we came to the conclusion that the command of the article 515, # 3rd of the statute 10.352/01, as well as the mandatory review law are unconstitutional. Although following different way of reasoning, we based both conclusions on the unshakable grounds of the Major Law.<br>Tratamos no presente trabalho do princípio do duplo grau de jurisdição, procurando compreendê-lo à luz da Constituição Federal de 1988 para, em seguida, promover uma análise crítica sobre a constitucionalidade das recentes reformas introduzidas pela Lei 10.352, de 26 de dezembro de 2001, no Código de Processo Civil, especialmente as que se operaram nos artigos 475 e 515. A escolha do tema sofreu os influxos dos estudos desenvolvidos em Direito Processual Constitucional, propiciando o aprofundamento de matéria que interessa tanto ao Direito Constitucional quanto ao Direito Processual. Foi justamente a possibilidade desse estudo interdisciplinar, notadamente atual e relevante, que motivou a elaboração do presente trabalho. Discutir a garantia do duplo grau de jurisdição, sobretudo seu alcance e sua inserção constitucional, implica questionar as próprias ações do Estado em relação aos jurisdicionados, no âmbito de um Estado Democrático e de Direito, já que tal garantia viabiliza o reexame de decisões judiciais, inclusive, contra arbitrariedades do Poder Público, o qual, aliás, é reconhecidamente o maior litigante habitual dos processos judiciais em trâmite no nosso País. As limitações trazidas pela nova lei ao duplo grau de jurisdição reabrem nova discussão sobre a antiga polêmica de como conciliar segurança jurídica e celeridade processual, com vistas à obtenção de uma tutela jurisdicional efetiva, da qual vêm se ocupando processualistas de todo o mundo. Para responder à indagação sobre a constitucionalidade ou não das alterações anteriormente mencionadas, foi necessário percorrer um longo trajeto, que exigiu o desenvolvimento de pesquisa documental e bibliográfica envolvendo o estudo dos princípios, em particular, dos princípios constitucionais, a compreensão do princípio do duplo grau de jurisdição, sua definição e alcance, bem como suas relações com outros importantes princípios previstos expressamente na Constituição Federal em vigor. Foi necessário, ainda, estabelecer as ligações entre o princípio do duplo grau e os recursos previstos no ordenamento pátrio e daquele com o instituto do reexame obrigatório, analisando-se, outrossim, do ponto de vista constitucional, as exceções dispostas em lei que limitam ou suprimem a garantia em tela. A partir do estudo desenvolvido, pôde-se concluir pela inconstitucionalidade da nova regra constante do parágrafo terceiro do artigo 515, bem como pela inconstitucionalidade da remessa necessária, por fundamentos diversos, porém seguramente construídos com amparo na Lei Maior.

The dissertation, which is entirely drafted in English, hinges on a comparative study of both the Italian and British legal system - including some reference to the American jurisdiction - from the point of view of the criminal procedure rules. Through the analysis of a specific case study, namely the trial for the murder of Meredith Kercher, the paper aims to highlight what the substantial differences between civil law and common law are and the extent to which these divergencies can impact criminal proceedings. Therefore, particular attention is placed on the media coverage that the case has had, both in Italy and in United Kingdom and the United States, and on how this has - perhaps only apparently - influenced the trial and public opinion.

Цивільний процес, після оприлюднення Закону України «Про внесення змін до Господарського процесуального кодексу України, Цивільного процесуального кодексу України, Кодексу адміністративного судочинства України та інших законодавчих актів» від 03.10.2017 р., набув дещо нового вигляду та містить новели, які ще не були застосовані судами. Тут важливе точне трактування процедури цих змін, а також ретельна підготовка до їх впровадження. Одна з новел – це упровадження спрощеного позовного провадження.<br>The civil process, after the promulgation of the Law of Ukraine "On Amendments to the Economic Procedure Code of Ukraine, the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, the Code of Administrative Judiciary of Ukraine and other legislative acts" of 03.10.2017, has become somewhat new and contains novelties that have not been applied by the courts. What is important here is an accurate interpretation of the process of these changes, as well as a thorough preparation for their implementation. One of the novelties is the introduction of a simplified claim proceedings.

In light of the plight of the vast Peruvian regime, in this article, the constitutional grounds of the disciplinary regime and sanctioned procedure will be discussed; and if the current regulation of the civil service law consistent with these fundamentals and the extensive regime of Peruvian labor laws in the legislative development focusing on those powers granted to authorities specifically with regard to the disciplinary measures and disciplinary proceedings.<br>A la luz de la compleja situación del extenso régimen peruano, en el presente artículo se analizará el sustento constitucional del régimen disciplinario y procedimiento sancionador. Asimismo, se analizará si la actual regulación de la Ley de Servicio civil coincide con estos fundamentos y el extenso régimen de la normativa laboral peruana enfocándose, de esta manera, en el desarrollo legislativo sobre aquellas facultades otorgadas a las autoridades encargadas, específicamente, en lo referido al régimen disciplinario y procedimiento sancionador.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:20:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Gustavo Goncalves Gomes.pdf: 1410436 bytes, checksum: 95aa99fb61557c7593475a4d9d751694 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-05-30<br>This dissertation studies the participative civil procedure and has as its aim the analysis of Brazilian current procedural framework - dated of 1973 - according to the bedrock premises of the Legal Democratic State and in compliance with the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988. In order to achieve this major objective, the research in the methodological level is supported by the deductive method and the case law research technique. Concerning the structure, this paper is divided in three chapters: the first one explains the Legal Democratic State and the Procedure . The second one analyses the participative behaviour of the judges in lawsuits governed by the Brazilian Procedure Law system. Finally, the last chapter compares factors that contribute to the construction of a participative procedure model. The conclusion reached is that the modern civil procedure law cannot survive anymore without its due compliance with substantive law. In this sense, it is necessary to revisit the instrumental premises of procedure law, in a way that it may contribute more and more to the rendering of quick, fair and adequate judicial pronouncements. In order to develop a new procedural framework in compliance with actual necessities of the Brazilian society, a proactive behaviour of all becomes mandatory. The most reasonable pathway to achieve this objective is to develop of a participative civil procedure system as a mechanism to enhance democratic state of law's strength. Through this constitutionally sustainable procedure law model, the judges would have a structural role in conducting the lawsuits towards a singular direction, with the purpose of enhancing judicial decisions rendering. A participative performance of the judges in lawsuits is one of the main aims of the society, as the latter clearly acknowledges that judges hold the power/duty of optimizing judicial decisions rendering, in a way that it may bring a better quality and more effectivity to the whole system. Notwithstanding, there are other problems to be faced, such as the lack of structure in the Judiciary and its current crisis (which is different from the procedure law crisis). However, as evidenced in any other company or organization, the Judiciary needs to be surrounded by active, proactive and creative professionals. Also, a profound change of values in the juridical environment is necessary for a satisfactory evolution<br>O presente trabalho traz como tema de estudo o processo civil participativo e tem como finalidade avaliar o modelo processual civil atual, em vigor desde 1973, de acordo com as premissas norteadoras do Estado Democrático de Direito e em sintonia com a nossa Constituição Federal. Para atingir este objetivo maior, a pesquisa conta, no plano metodológico, com o apoio da abordagem de raciocínio dedutivo e da técnica de pesquisa bibliográfica. Quanto à estrutura, o trabalho se divide em três capítulos: o primeiro discorre sobre Estado Democrático de Direito e Processo ; o segundo trata de analisar o comportamento participativo dos magistrados na contenda do sistema processual brasileiro, por fim, o terceiro coteja os fatores que contribuem para a construção de um modelo de processo participativo. A conclusão a que se chega é que o processo civil moderno já não pode mais sobreviver sem o devido alinhamento ao plano do direito material e, neste sentido, é necessário revisitar as premissas instrumentais do processo, de forma que este sirva, cada vez mais, como aliado do Estado na outorga rápida, justa e adequada da prestação jurisdicional. Para o desenvolvimento de uma nova configuração processual, de acordo com as reais necessidades da sociedade brasileira, torna-se indispensável uma maior proatividade de todos no sistema. O desenvolvimento de processo civil participativo, como instrumento ao fortalecimento do Estado Democrático de Direito é o caminho mais razoável a seguir. Nesse modelo de processo, constitucionalmente sustentável, os magistrados possuem a função estrutural de conduzir a demanda em uma só direção, ou seja, com o objetivo de viabilizar a outorga da prestação jurisdicional. Uma atuação participativa dos magistrados no processo é um dos principais anseios da sociedade, pois esta é sabedora de que os juízes possuem o poder-dever de otimizar a outorga da prestação jurisdicional, trazendo maior qualidade e efetividade ao sistema. Logicamente, há outros problemas a serem enfrentados, como a falta de estrutura e a crise do Poder Judiciário (que não se confunde com crise do processo), mas, como em qualquer empresa ou organização, o Poder Judiciário precisa estar cercado de profissionais mais atuantes, proativos e criativos, sendo necessária uma profunda mudança de valores no meio jurídico, para que se possa evoluir de forma satisfatória

Цивільне судочинство покликане захищати права, свободи та законні інтереси громадян. Це твердження логічно випливає із положень статті 1 Цивільного процесуального кодексу України (далі – ЦПК) [1]. При цьому, у цивільному процесуальному праві виділяють три основні види судочинства: позовне, наказне та окреме провадження. Окреме провадження є видом непозовного цивільного судочинства. У теорії цивільного процесу виникають дискусії щодо доцільності розмежування видів цивільного судочинства на позовне та окреме в силу того, що деякі науковці не спостерігають явної різниці між правовою природою цих інститутів цивільного процесу.

Submitted by Andréia Caetano Brito (andreia_brito@icloud.com) on 2017-09-26T16:47:54Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação Andréia Brito_versão revisada.pdf: 1893857 bytes, checksum: 066fa46712f08b8600ef0f3ed0d1041b (MD5)<br>Approved for entry into archive by Thais Oliveira (thais.oliveira@fgv.br) on 2017-09-26T16:50:45Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação Andréia Brito_versão revisada.pdf: 1893857 bytes, checksum: 066fa46712f08b8600ef0f3ed0d1041b (MD5)<br>Made available in DSpace on 2017-09-27T12:07:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação Andréia Brito_versão revisada.pdf: 1893857 bytes, checksum: 066fa46712f08b8600ef0f3ed0d1041b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-08-15<br>The Brazilian civil procedural law is going through a moment of extreme importance, with the regulation, by Law nº 13.105/2015, of our theory of precedents. In pursuit of ensuring the aimed legal certainty and predictability, clear rules have been introduced in our legal system to standardize jurisprudence, which require respect for judicial precedents, in particular, its determinant foundations (ratio decidendi). Faced with this new scenario, in which judicial decisions will be considered binding precedents, if they have certain characteristics defined by the New Code of Civil Procedure (CPC/2015), we believe that it is of utmost importance to assess whether decisions, rendered in the judgment of repetitive Appeals under the CPC/1973’s rules, are capable of being considered as precedents and binding judges and courts. Thus, in this paper, we will confront, in an exemplary way, decisions rendered in repetitive demands under the CPC/1973 system, with the mechanisms introduced by the CPC/2015 for the creation and application of binding precedents. As will be seen, in the cases analyzed, it was not possible to identify the for the mechanisms implemented in Brazilian procedural law and, therefore, we understand that the law enforcers have the duty to provoke the Supreme Courts to review their understanding, in order to ensure that these decisions are not binding, mechanically, as we have already seen.<br>O direito processual civil brasileiro passa por um momento de extrema importância, com a normatização, pela Lei nº13.105/2015, da nossa particular teoria dos precedentes. Em busca das tão almejadas segurança e previsibilidade, foram introduzidas, no nosso ordenamento jurídico, regras para induzir a uniformização jurisprudencial, que impõem o respeito aos precedentes judiciais, em especial, aos seus fundamentos determinantes (ratio decidendi). Ante a esse novo cenário, em que decisões judiciais serão consideradas precedentes vinculantes, caso portem determinados requisitos definidos pelo Novo Código de Processo Civil (CPC/2015), entendemos que é de suma importância avaliar se as decisões, proferidas em sede de julgamento de recursos repetitivos, na vigência da Lei nº 5.869/1973 (CPC/1973), estão aptas a serem consideradas precedentes e a vincular juízes e tribunais. Assim, no presente trabalho, confrontaremos, de forma exemplificativa, decisões proferidas em demandas repetitivas na sistemática do CPC/1973, com os mecanismos trazidos pelo CPC/2015 para a criação e aplicação de precedentes vinculantes. Conforme se verificará, nos casos analisados, não foi possível identificar o respeito aos recentes mecanismos introduzidos no direito processual brasileiro e, por isso, entendemos que os operadores do direito têm o dever de provocar os Tribunais Superiores para reverem seu entendimento, a fim de garantir que essas decisões não sejam dotadas de natureza vinculante, de forma mecânica, como, inclusive, já temos verificado.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:23:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Paulo Alberto Sarno.pdf: 1129443 bytes, checksum: 18c2e8c5cc4eb2a1535ad3e61326a1b2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-12-08<br>This study examines the role of differentiated jurisdictional tutelage as an instrument to ensure the effectiveness and the promptness of justice in the Civil Procedure Code and in the collective microsystem. Firstly, some issues involving effective access to justice are approached since they are a fundamental right which seeks to guard the existential minimum embraced by the Constitution. Among the issues investigated it is highlighted the Code of Civil Procedure and the rules involving metaindividual rights, collective tutelage and procedural techniques (cautionary and anticipatory ones as well as supplementary application of the Code of Civil Procedure in collective microsystem). As an example of differentiated tutelage on environmental law, this research addresses the approximation of substantive and procedural rights based on the principles of prevention, precaution and reparation. Specific cases serve as examples of its applicability. This study seeks to demonstrate that access to justice is only for the actual grant of substantive right postulated by the party (Article 5, XXXV, of the Federal Constitution of 1988). For this purpose, legislation must foster procedural mechanisms necessary to materially meet the required pretension, whether injunctive or final. The examination of the procedural syncretism showed that the art.273, paragraph 7, of the Code of Civil Procedure finds natural support on collective microsystem by revealing the symbiosis of procedural techniques, unveiled in the original wording of art.4 of Law 7.347/ 85. Concerning collective demands, the legal microsystem consolidated differentiated jurisdictional protection techniques, which have adapted the procedural instrument to the attainment of the substantive right. The study also addresses the reverse burden of proof (device that favors the achievement of differentiated jurisdictional tutelage), the writ or executive lato sensu nature of consumerist norms and the supplementary application of the Civil Procedure Code. It is also important to stress the collective res judicata and the limitation of cognition in order to demonstrate that the collective microsystem is a model of differentiated jurisdictional tutelage, with a focus on transportation in utilibus, regarding the settlement of res judicata in the class action trial. On another level, the study shows the parity between the art.84 of the Code of Consumer Rights and art.461 of the Civil Procedure Code, for the achievement of specific enforcement or of the equivalent practical result. The study also concludes the unconstitutionality of the art.16 of the Law of Civil Action which is incompatible with the ideals of the effectiveness of jurisdictional tutelage. Therefore, within the collective scope it is designed the effectiveness of the proceedings, with the provision of mechanisms that would support the substantive law on new horizons. Thus, this research reveals how the system of differentiated jurisdictional tutelage, delineated in the Civil Procedure Code and the collective microsystem, is essential for the effectiveness of justice and the achievement of beneficial outcome of the case, expected by society<br>O estudo proposto investiga o papel da tutela jurisdicional diferenciada como um instrumento para garantir a efetividade e a celeridade da justiça no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivo. Inicialmente, são abordadas questões envolvendo o acesso efetivo à justiça, um direito fundamental que visa ao resguardo do mínimo existencial albergado pela Carta Política. Entre os aspectos investigados, destacam-se o Código de Processo Civil e a legislação que envolve os direitos metaindividuais, a tutela coletiva e as técnicas processuais (antecipação e acautelatória e a aplicação subsidiária do Código de Processo Civil no microssistema coletivo). Como exemplo de tutela diferenciada no direito ambiental, a pesquisa aborda a aproximação dos direitos material e processual com base nos princípios da prevenção, da precaução e da reparação. Casos concretos servem como exemplo de sua aplicabilidade. O estudo procura demonstrar que o acesso à justiça ocorre apenas com a efetiva entrega do direito material postulado pela parte (art.5º, XXXV, da Constituição Federal de 1988). Para tanto, a legislação deve acolher os mecanismos processuais necessários para satisfazer materialmente a pretensão requerida, seja ela cautelar ou satisfativa. Com o exame do sincretismo processual, demonstrou-se que o art.273, §7º, do Código de Processo Civil encontra assento natural no microssistema coletivo ao revelar a simbiose de técnicas processuais, desvelada na redação original do art. 4º da Lei nº7.347/85. Quanto às demandas coletivas, o microssistema legal consolidou técnicas de tutela jurisdicional diferenciada, que adequaram o instrumento processual à consecução do direito material. O estudo aborda ainda a inversão do ônus da prova (mecanismo favorável à conquista da tutela jurisdicional diferenciada), a natureza mandamental ou executiva lato sensu das normas consumeristas e a aplicação subsidiária do Código de Processo Civil. Há também importante destaque para a coisa julgada coletiva e a limitação da cognição, de modo a demonstrar que o microssistema coletivo é um modelo de tutela jurisdicional diferenciada, com enfoque para o transporte in utilibus, no que toca à liquidação do julgado nas ações coletivas. Em outro plano, o estudo demonstra a paridade entre o art.84 do Código de Defesa do Consumidor e o art.461 do Código de Processo Civil, para a conquista da execução específica ou do resultado prático equivalente. O estudo conclui, ainda, pela inconstitucionalidade do art.16 da Lei da Ação Civil Pública, incompatível com o ideário de efetividade da tutela jurisdicional. Desenhou-se, assim, no âmbito coletivo, a efetividade do processo, com a previsão de mecanismos para amparar o direito substancial em novas frentes. Ao final, a pesquisa revela como o regime da tutela jurisdicional diferenciada, estabelecido no Código de Processo Civil e no microssistema coletivo, é imprescindível para a efetividade da justiça e o alcance do resultado útil do processo almejados pela sociedade

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:24:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao Marcelo Camargo Magano.pdf: 533789 bytes, checksum: db2344b79ea9b83c4e754939195fc243 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006-05-18<br>The present work aims to delimit the essential aspects of double degree of jurisdiction, analyzing it since its creation, in Brazil, up to the current stage of development. Double degree of jurisdiction will be studied in light of constitutional principles. Furthermore, this study will investigate whether or not the possibility of its extinction causes losses to the right of the parties and to the lawsuit. In this context, the advantages and disadvantages of the maintenance of the principle of double degree of jurisdiction are discussed, as well as its relation to the devolutive effect of the appeals. The recognition that it is a constitutional principle does not mean granting an absolute character to it, as the infra-constitutional legislator is responsible for saying how it should effectively act. Ordinary legislators must balance some values (rule of law and procedural effectiveness) when choosing options to inform their legislative activity. From this derives the need to give greater effectiveness to the lawsuit, in opposition to the idea of the lawsuit as a mere technical instrument. Law no. 10352/2001 relatively mitigated the principle of the double degree of jurisdiction, by allowing, in article 515, paragraph 3, of the Code of Civil Procedure, that the court appreciates the grounds of the action, in cases of abatement of action (final judgment), provided that it is a question of law and of fact and there is no need to present evidence in the trial. These changes reveal that jurisdiction must be studied in the perspective of other elements, related to the duration of the lawsuit or by means of mechanisms that guarantee access to justice. Therefore, jurisdiction must be exercised in a more rationalized and effective way for the solution of the legal controversies between the parties. It is considered that timely jurisdiction is more effective than tardy jurisdiction<br>O presente trabalho tem por propósito demarcar os aspectos essenciais do duplo grau de jurisdição. O instituto é analisado desde sua criação no Brasil até o seu desenvolvimento atual na legislação. O duplo grau será estudado à luz dos princípios constitucionais, bem como a possibilidade de sua supressão causar ou não prejuízo ao direito das partes. Nesse contexto, também são discutidas as vantagens e desvantagens do princípio do duplo grau de jurisdição e sua relação com o efeito devolutivo dos recursos. O reconhecimento de que se trata de princípio constitucional implícito não significa conferir-lhe caráter absoluto, pois compete ao legislador infraconstitucional balizar o seu campo de atuação. A Lei 10.352/2001 imprimiu certa mitigação ao princípio do duplo grau de jurisdição ao inserir o parágrafo terceiro no art. 515 do CPC, permitindo que o tribunal aprecie o mérito nos casos de extinção do processo (sentença terminativa), desde que a causa esteja madura para o julgamento, isto é, inexista controvérsia ou haja provas suficientes para a solução da lide. Essas mudanças revelam a necessidade de a tutela jurisdicional ser estudada sob a perspectiva de outros elementos, sejam eles relacionados com a razoável duração do processo ou por meio de mecanismos que garantam o acesso à justiça. Portanto, a tutela jurisdicional deve ser exercida de forma mais racionalizada e efetiva para a solução das lides

Confronté à des atteintes massives et lucratives, le droit de la propriété intellectuelle est protégé par des réseaux de normes répressives, formant la matière pénale. Le droit pénal, droit traditionnel de protection des autres droits, forme un réseau composé de règles pénales, tant substantielles que formelles, spécifiques au droit de la propriété intellectuelle, et de certaines infractions contre les biens, du livre troisième du code pénal. Ces normes se heurtent à plusieurs écueils. Le droit pénal de la propriété intellectuelle appréhende difficilement le caractère massif ou transfrontalier des infractions et si les incriminations du code pénal peuvent s’inscrire dans les vides répressifs laissés par celui-ci, leur adaptation aux biens incorporels non rivaux bouleverse les équilibres. D’une part, cette adaptation est réalisée pour leur application aux informations, sans considération de leur caractère appropriable, ce qui affaiblit l’intérêt du droit de la propriété intellectuelle. D’autre part, ces infractions entrent en concours avec celles spécifiques au droit de la propriété intellectuelle. Ineffectif, le droit pénal de la propriété intellectuelle subit, aussi, la dépénalisation judiciaire de ce droit. Ignorant l’indispensable réforme de ce droit pénal, le législateur a créé de nouveaux réseaux répressifs. Si le droit administratif répressif, mis en œuvre par l’HADOPI, pouvait constituer une alternative pertinente au droit pénal, pour la lutte contre la massification des infractions au droit d’auteur et aux droits voisins sur Internet, l’attribution des sanctions au juge répressif en a réduit l’attrait. A l’aune de la jurisprudence de la CEDH, les normes civiles répressives, applicables au droit de la propriété intellectuelle, forment un réseau rival du droit pénal, dont les effets systémiques imposent de réfléchir au dessein de la frontière entre les responsabilités civile et pénale. La matière pénale de la propriété intellectuelle, née de la dilatation de la répression, est donc constituée de normes pénales, dont seules celles du code pénal apparaissent effectives, d’un droit administratif à la fonction répressive altérée et d’un droit civil répressif inefficace. Protection défaillante d’un droit affaibli, elle doit être restructurée. Une cohérence peut être instaurée par son organisation autour du droit de propriété, dont émane le droit de la propriété intellectuelle. La création d’un droit pénal de la propriété pourrait ainsi conférer une protection efficace au droit de la propriété intellectuelle, complétée par des normes répressives spécifiques<br>The intellectual property rights, which are confronted with massive, lucrative infringements, are protected by several networks of repressive norms that constitute criminal matters. Penal law, a traditional body of law for the protection of the other forms of law, constitute the first network. It is composed of criminal law rules, both substantive and procedural, which are specific to intellectual property law, and certain property offences from Book III of the French Penal Code. These norms encounter several obstacles. This criminal law applied to intellectual property has difficulty grasping the massive or cross-border nature of infringements. Although offences under the French Penal Code may occur in the punitive legal vacuum left by this body of law, their adaptation to non-rival intangible assets upsets balances. On the one hand, this adaptation is effected by applying them to information without taking account of their appropriable nature, thereby weakening the benefits of intellectual property law. On the other hand, these offences compete with offences that are specific to intellectual property law. Penal law, which is ineffective, has also been subject to the judicial decriminalization of intellectual property law. Overlooking the pressing need to reform such criminal law applied to intellectual property, legislators have created new repressive networks. Whereas repressive administrative law, as implemented by HADOPI, could offer a relevant alternative to the massification of infringements of copyright and related rights on the Internet, allowing judges exercising criminal jurisdiction to impose sanctions has diminished its appeal. In the light of the ECHR’s case-law, repressive civil law forms a rival network to penal law, but its ineffectiveness with regard to intellectual property law and its systemic effects force us to reflect on the purpose for the boundary between civil and criminal liability. Criminal matters, which stem from the expansion of judicial repression, are thus comprised of criminal norms, of which only those of the French Penal Code appear effective, of administrative law with an altered repressive function, and of ineffective repressive civil law. Since the protection of a weakened right turned out to be defective, it must be restructured. Consistency can be achieved by organizing it around property law which is the origin of intellectual property law. Using this approach, creating penal law applied to property could offer effective protection for intellectual property rights, supplemented by specific repressive norms

O escopo deste trabalho é analisar a tutela jurisdicional diferenciada, suas caracteríticas, limitações e utilizá-la como uma das soluções para a morosidade do Poder Judiciário. Para isso, investigaremos o próprio conceito de tutela jurisdicional, fazendo uma análise histórica e chegando ao conceito atual. Após, estudaremos cada um dos tipos específicos de tutela jurisdicional diferenciada, examinando suas peculiaridades e problemática. Nesse capítulo estudaremos a tutela cautelar, antecipada e a de evidência (grande novidade incluída no projeto do novo Código de Processo Civil). Também estudaremos outras medidas de cognição sumária, apesar de esses outros tipos não apresentarem qualquer problema para se estabilizarem. No capítulo 3 trataremos das características específicas da tutela jurisdicional diferenciada, principalmente da sumariedade na cognição, requisito essencial para esse tipo de tutela. Em seguida, serão examinados os princípios constitucionais-processuais, como o devido processo legal e o princípio da igualdade e de como achar um equilíbrio entre a eficiência exigida pelo Estado e a duração razoável do processo, dever do Poder Judiciário e garantia dos jurisdicionados. A questão da coisa julgada, da sucumbência e da fundamentação da decisão serão trabalhadas no capítulo 5. Pretendemos demonstrar nesse capítulo de como é possível outorgar força de coisa julgada para as decisões de cognição sumária, e não apenas a preclusão endoprocessual como prevista no projeto de novo Código de Processo Civil. Por fim, analisamos as propostas legislativas já apresentadas pelo Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual e o projeto de novo Código de Processo Civil. Ao longo do trabalho foram analisados a doutrina nacional e estudos de outros países, investigados a aceitação desses institutos e a recepção pelo Poder Judiciário, pelos advogados e pelos jurisdicionados.<br>The scope of this work is to analyze the non-ordinary court protection, their characters, and limitations and to find a way to use it as one of the solutions to the slow pace of the Judiciary branch. For this, we investigate the concept of court protection, making an historical analysis up to the present concept. After this, we study each of the specific types of non-ordinary court protection, examining their peculiarities and their problems. In this chapter we study provisional proceedings, evidence court protection (a new institute included in the project Code of Civil Procedure). We also study other non-ordinary proceedings. In chapter 3 we study the specific characteristics of the non-ordinary court protection, mostly the summary cognition, an essential requirement. Furthermore, we analyze the constitutional procedural principles, like due process of law, the principle of equality; and find a balance between efficiency and reasonable length of the proceedings, which is duty of the Judiciary branch and a guarantee of the population. We also analyze the res judicata, loss of suit and opinion in chapter 5. In this chapter, we want to demonstrate the possibility of granting res judicata to non-ordinary court protection and not only to the preclusion of the process. Ultimately, we analyze the legal proposes already presented by Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual and the project of a new Code of Civil Procedure. In this work, we also study national doctrine and foreign legal writing. We investigate these new institutes, mostly the evidence court protection and the reception by the Judiciary branch, both from lawyers and the population.

Evitar que o tempo atue como agente de corrosão de diretos durante o longo período de pendência do processo deve ser uma verdadeira obsessão do processualista moderno, consciencioso da finalidade e da existência da ciência processual que constitui o seu objeto de estudo. A visão teleológica do processo como instrumento de realização do direito material deve estar presente na interpretação de todas as regras processuais, sempre tendo em mente o sábio conselho de Chesterton, para quem o homem pode enxergar mais longe se subir aos ombros dos que vieram antes. Romper com velhos dogmas para proporcionar resposta aos novos problemas é fazer com que o direito processual seja dinâmico, conferindo-lhe a capacidade de superar crises de efetividade. A alteração dos fatos durante a longa travessia que é o processo constitui o objeto deste estudo, sobretudo no que se refere aos impactos sobre importantes figuras e institutos processuais como a causa de pedir, a estabilização da demanda, a rigidez do sistema preclusivo, a inércia da jurisdição e a interpretação destes, plasmada nos princípios constitucionais do contraditório e da duração razoável do processo, que integram o conceito amplo do devido processo legal. Para alcançar tais propósitos, esta dissertação está estruturada em cinco partes. O acesso à ordem jurídica justa é o tema inicial e o primeiro capítulo é destinado ao seu estudo. Acesso à justiça não se confunde com estar em juízo. O seu real significado está relacionado com a realização da promessa constitucional de entrega da tutela jurisdicional a quem efetivamente tem direito a ela, sempre lembrando que ela deve ser justa, igualitária e tempestiva. O capitulo dois, núcleo da abordagem teórica do objeto deste estudo, centra-se na identificação da demanda e de seus elementos objetivos, em que se busca demonstrar a existência de uma pluralidade de possibilidades para a investigação do mesmo problema. A concepção alemã do objeto do processo (ou objeto litigioso) enfoca o problema de modo absolutamente distinto daquele concebido pelo direito italiano (teoria dos três eadem). O tempero dado pelas teorias da substanciação e individualização para identificação do núcleo resistente da causa de pedir demonstram a necessidade da análise dos elementos que compõem a demanda, em atenção ao direito material que se busca fazer valer em juízo. Os direitos autodeterminados e heterodeterminados reclamam a utilização de métodos distintos para identificação da causa petendi, demonstrando que esta figura jurídica goza de certa elasticidade. O capítulo três desenvolve a conceituação do fato superveniente e do fato de conhecimento superveniente, bem como o impacto distinto destes na esfera jurídica do autor e do réu, analisando o último momento do procedimento em que é praticamente possível introduzir o fato novo e, sobretudo, o real alcance do art. 462 do Código de Processo Civil. A interpretação deste dispositivo processual revela um poderoso alcance de notável utilidade para aperfeiçoamento do processo como método estatal de solução de controvérsias. O quarto capítulo problematiza os limites da modificação da causa de pedir no curso do processo, com a superação do dogma da estabilização da demanda. A não-incidência ou não-aplicação de regras processuais meramente formais para dar efetividade aos princípios constitucionais informadores do devido processo legal é a pedra de toque para a conclusão a que se chega ao fim do trabalho. O capítulo cinco, conclusivo do percurso analítico empreendido, apresenta o estágio de compreensão do objeto alcançado neste estudo. Garantido o contraditório e a ampla defesa, deve ser prestigiado o princípio constitucional da duração razoável do processo, cuja correta interpretação é dele extrair uma garantia de resolução integral da crise de direito material com o menor grau de perturbação social possível, ou seja, com o menor dispêndio de energia e tempo, o que implica reconhecer a possibilidade de modificação da causa petendi.<br>Avoiding time to act as a corrosion agent of rights during the long period of a pending case must be a true obsession for the modern expert in civil procedure, conscious of the purpose and existence of procedural science that constitutes its object of study. The teleological vision of the judicial process as an instrument of realization of substantive law shall be present in the interpretation of all procedural rules, always keeping Chestertons wise advice in mind, to whom a man can see further if he climbs on the shoulders of those who came before. Breaking with old dogmas to provide solutions to new problems is to make procedural law dynamic, giving it the capability to overcome crises of effectiveness. The change of events during the long journey of the case is the object of this study, particularly with regard to the impacts on important procedural figures and institutions such as cause of action, stabilization of claim, rigidity of the preclusive system, inertia of jurisdiction and its interpretation, present in the constitutional principles of adversary system and reasonable time of proceedings, which form the broad concept of due process of law. To achieve such aims, this dissertation is structured in five parts. The access to the fair legal system is the opening theme and the first chapter focuses on its study. Access to justice should not be confused with being at court. Its real meaning is related to the implementation of the constitutional promise of delivery of legal protection to those who are actually entitled to it, always remembering that it must be fair, equitable and timely. The second chapter, the core of the theoretical object of this study, focuses on the identification of the litigation and its objective elements and seeks to demonstrate the existence of a plurality of possibilities for the investigation of the same problem. The German conception of the subject matter (or litigious matter) analyzes the 194 problem in a completely different manner from that designed by the Italian Law (theory of the three eadem). The effect given by the theories of substantiation and individualization for the identification of the resistant core of the cause of action demonstrate the necessity of analyzing the elements of claim, in response to the substantive law that seeks to be enforced in court. The self-determined and heterodetermined rights claim the use of different methods to identify the causa petendi demostrating that this legal concept hás certain elasticity. The third chapter develops the concept of supervening fact and supervening knowledge of the fact as well as their different impact on the legal sphere of the plaintiff and the defendant; the last moment of the proceedings that permits the introduction of the new fact is analyzed and, especially, the actual scope of article 462 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The interpretation of this procedural provision reveals a remarkable range of powerful utility for improving the legal process as a state method of settlement. The fourth chapter discusses the limits to change the cause of action during the course of action overcoming the dogma of the stabilization of claim. The nonlevy or non-application of purely formal procedural rules to give effect to the constitutional principles which inform the due process of law is the cornerstone of the conclusion reached at the end of the work. The fifth chapter concludes the undertaken analytical path and presents the understanding stage of the object of this study. Being the adversary system and full defense guaranteed, the constitutional principle of reasonable time of proceedings must be considered. Its correct interpretation is to acquire a guarantee of full resolution of the crisis of substantive law with the lowest degree of social disruption as possible, i.e., the lowest expenditure of energy and time, which means recognizing the possibility of changing the causa petendi.

Civilinio proceso atnaujinimas yra išimtinė procesinė priemonė, padedanti užtikrinti žmogaus teisę į teismą. Jo tikslas yra pašalinti galimai neteisėtą teismo sprendimą, taip įvykdant teisingumą ir išvengiant tokio sprendimo pasekmių. Tačiau pažvelgus į LR Civilinio proceso kodeksą, matome, jog Lietuvoje nėra įtvirtinta galimybė atnaujinti procesą, kuomet LR Konstitucinis Teismas pripažįsta teisės aktą, kuriuo teismas rėmėsi priimdamas sprendimą civilinėje byloje, prieštaraujančiu LR Konstitucijai. Suformuota LR teismų praktika draudžia proceso atnaujinimą civilinėse bylose šiuo pagrindu, kadangi būtų pažeistas teisinių santykių stabilumo bei teisinių santykių subjektų teisių ir pareigų apibrėžtumo principai. Tačiau priešingai nei civilinėse bylose, administracinėse bylose proceso atnaujinimas šiuo pagrindu yra leidžiamas. Panagrinėję užsienio valstybių teisinį reguliavimą, matome, jog apie pusė Europos valstybių leidžia proceso atnaujinimą šiuo pagrindu civilinėse bylose bylose, o baudžiamosiose bylose – beveik visos nagrinėtos valstybės. Žmogaus teisių užtikrinimo svarbą civilinėse bylose pabrėžia Europos Žmogaus Teisių Teismas. Nors EŽTT laikosi nuomonės, jog proceso atnaujinimą riboja teisinio tikrumo principas, tačiau tam tikrais atvejais proceso atnaujinimas gali būti efektyviausia priemone atstatant teisingumą, kuris buvo paneigtas pažeidus žmogaus teises. Tuo tarpu LR Konstitucinis Teismas laikosi pozicijos, jog proceso atnaujinimas nagrinėjamu pagrindu yra... [toliau žr. visą tekstą]<br>Reopening of civil proceedings is an exclusive procedural measure, which helps to ensure a right to court. It‘s aim is to remove possibly unlawful court decision, thus delivering justice and avoiding consequences of such decision. Therefore, reopening of civil proceedings seeks to protect not only interests of private parties, but also public interest. However, if we look to Code of Civil procedure of the Republic of Lithuania, we can see a lack of possibility in Lithuania to reopen proceedings, when Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania declares that law applied in a specific case is in conflict with the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania. Lithuanian case law does not allow reopening of proceedings in civil cases based on mentioned ground, because otherwise principles of stability of legal relations and certainty of rights and duties of subjects‘ legal relations would be breached. Contrary to civil cases, administrative cases may be reopened based on mantioned grounds. Moreover, administrative courts examine cases regarding damages, incurred due to unlawful actions of public administration bodies, and these cases may also be reopened based on mentioned ground, though they are civil cases. Therefore, administrative courts case law and general competence courts case law differs on the question regarding reopening of proceedings in civil cases, when Constituional Court of the Republic of Lithuania declares that law applied in a specific case is in conflict... [to full text]

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:22:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Lilian Regina Ioti Henrique Gaspar.pdf: 915540 bytes, checksum: 3bd23f09c211003c63c6611d95e11d21 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-06-10<br>Both the Common Law legal systems and the Civil Law jurisdictions, aims to guard legal certainty and equality, given that these principles are essential to ensuring a fair and equitable society. This paper will demonstrate the importance of predictability for the establishment of a state founded on these principles. In this sense, become relevant the Supreme Courts, to the extent that they are responsible for giving unit to the law, that can be achieved through the establishment of precedents, to be followed by hierarchically lower courts. Thus, the idea that the judiciary is the body that acts, alone, in the resolution of individual disputes is obsolete and no longer consistent with the notion of system that must prevail in any legal system. It is based on the positions adopted by the judiciary that citizens should guide their conduct. Therefore, for the judicial system to be effective and can provide legal certainty and equality for citizens, there must be mechanisms to confer binding to judicial precedents. Given this, will then be focused the technique of repetitive extraordinary and special appeals trial, introduced in our legal system by the Acts 11.418 passed in 2006 and 11.472 passed in 2008, through the articles 543-B and 543-C of the Civil Procedure Code, as a way to demonstrate their ability to provide predictability to the law, by giving unity to its interpretation, enabling identical cases receive the same solution of the judiciary. Within this perspective this work, which, in a critical way, try to force a larger reflection on the institutes involved will be developed<br>Tanto os sistemas jurisdicionais de Common Law, quanto as jurisdições de Civil Law, tem por objetivo o resguardo da segurança jurídica e da isonomia, tendo em vista que tais princípios são essenciais para a garantia de uma sociedade justa e igualitária. O presente trabalho demonstrará a importância da previsibilidade do direito para o estabelecimento de um Estado fundado nesses preceitos. Nesse sentido, ganham relevância os Tribunais de Cúpula, na medida em que são eles os responsáveis por conceder unidade ao direito, unidade esta que pode ser alcançada por meio do estabelecimento de precedentes, que devem ser seguidos pelos tribunais hierarquicamente inferiores. Assim, a ideia de que o Judiciário é órgão que atua, tão somente, na resolução dos conflitos individuais é obsoleta e não mais condiz com a noção de sistema, que deve imperar em qualquer ordenamento jurídico. Com efeito, é com base nas posições adotadas pelo Poder Judiciário que os cidadãos devem pautar suas condutas. Portanto, para que o sistema jurisdicional seja efetivo e consiga proporcionar segurança jurídica e isonomia aos cidadãos, deve haver mecanismos capazes de conferir força obrigatória aos precedentes judiciais. Diante disso, será, então, enfocada a técnica de julgamento de recursos extraordinários e especiais repetitivos, introduzida em nosso ordenamento jurídico pelas Leis 11.418 de 2006 e 11.472 de 2008, por meio dos arts. 543-B e 543-C, do Código de Processo Civil, como forma de demonstrar a sua capacidade de assegurar previsibilidade ao direito, ao conceder unidade à sua interpretação, possibilitando que casos idênticos recebam a mesma solução do Judiciário. Dentro dessa ótica será desenvolvido este trabalho, que, de uma maneira crítica, tentará forçar uma maior reflexão acerca dos institutos envolvidos

Цивільне судочинство покликане захищати права, свободи та законні інтереси громадян. Це твердження логічно випливає із положень статті 1 Цивільного процесуального кодексу України (далі – ЦПК). При цьому, у цивільному процесуальному праві виділяють три основні види судочинства: позовне, наказне та окреме провадження.<br>Civil justice aims to protect the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of citizens. This statement logically follows from the provisions of Article 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure of Ukraine (hereinafter - the CPC). At the same time, there are three main types of litigation in civil procedural law: lawsuit, criminal and separate proceedings.

Le procès civil est le cadre traditionnel de réalisation de la justice des particuliers, et les règles qui le gouvernent se trouvent synthétisées dans les 24 premiers articles du CPC qui en énoncent les principes directeurs. Ces derniers organisent la répartition des charges processuelles entre les différents acteurs du procès, et déterminent ainsi l’essentiel de l’office du juge qui est construit autour du modèle contentieux du procès civil, taillé pour le juge du fond. Cependant, ce modèle subit des atténuations pour des raisons principalement d’équité ou de diligence, alors même que l’affaire qui est soumise au juge relève de la matière contentieuse. Dans la procédure gracieuse et dans celle de cassation, c’est la nature de la mission confiée au juge qui justifie parfois les atténuations apportées à ces principes, et parfois même leur effacement. Par ailleurs, l’action du juge à l’égard de ces principes directeurs va aussi dans le sens de leur adaptation aux évolutions juridiques et socio-économiques. Elle se traduit essentiellement d’une part, par une recherche d’effectivité de ces principes que le juge civil français n’hésite plus à rattacher à des normes supérieures, et d’autre part, par une recherche de leur efficience par le biais des techniques d’interprétation. Si dans le premier cas les phénomènes d’internationalisation et de constitutionnalisation du droit permettent d’expliquer une telle action, dans le second, se pose la question de la légitimité de la démarche. Notre pensée est que le juge d’aujourd’hui est aussi un juge gestionnaire dans un contexte d’accroissement de la demande de justice et de raréfaction des ressources allouées à la justice<br>Civil trial is the traditional framework where justice of individuals is usually delivered, and the rules which govern it are synthesized in the first 24 articles of the code of civil procedure which set out the guiding principles. The latter organize the sharing of procedural responsibilities between the different actors of the lawsuit, and determine the main part of the office of the judge built around the contentious model of the civil proceedings, cut for the ruling on the judges of the affairs. This model undergoes legal mitigations, mainly for reasons of equity or diligence, even though the case which is submitted to the judge is a matter of the contentious material. In the submission for an out-of-court settlement and that of the appeal to the supreme court, it is the nature of the mission entrusted to the judge who sometimes justifies the mitigations brought to these guiding principles, and sometimes even their disappearance. The action of the judge towards these principles also goes to the direction of their adaptation to evolutions so legal as Socio-Economic. It is essentially translated on the one hand, by a research for effectiveness of these principles which the judge does not hesitate to connect with superior standards, and on the other hand, by a research for their efficiency by means of the technique of interpretation. If in the first case the internationalization and constitutionnalisation explain such an action, the second case raises itself the question of the legitimacy of such an approach. Today’s judge is also a manager, especially in an increasing context of justice request and rarefaction of the resources assigned to the judicial administration

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:26:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Helio Rubens Batista Ribeiro Costa.pdf: 4204282 bytes, checksum: b2329752633fa1806df2a645c2de3e16 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-03-27<br>Throuhgout this dissertation, we will study the proper paper of the Supreme Federal Court, as agency of cupola of the Judiciary Brazilian and its vocation - modern - of acting as a Constitutional Court. To reach the intended desideratum, a depp study regarding the Supreme Federal Court will be developed based on historical and, as forecast of the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, the ability, the organization, the structure and the composition of the court. These subjects have, even though some indirectly, a link with the appeals process of the Brazilian Supreme Court. As the general lines regarding the Supreme Federal Court are traced, the dissertaion will explore the appeals process of the Brazilian Supreme Court considering the historical origins of the institute - flowing also under the support of the foreign law - and its main aspects and points of doctrinal interest, scuh as the processing, the prequestioning, the communication of "supersedeas", the execution that if processes while hanging its judgment and the rescission of the sentence in pronounced it. Along this paper, we will explore the control of constitutionality of the laws and the nornativs acts of the Public Power in one side and the question of the "binding abridgement"in another side. Finally, we will focus on the new roupagem of the appeals process of the Brazilian Supreme Court - if they detach the justinian codes of the prequestioning, of the general repercussion, as well as its concept, law nature, hypotheses of cabiment and the right to sumular referring it. This dissertation will make a detailed study of the legilative evolution concernents of the object of the work and, of sufficiently intense form. It will also examine the evolution of the jurisprudence of the Supreme Federal Court. Sentences pronounced by the Supreme one since times (sufficiently) past until the present will be analyzed, looking for to demonstrate the jurisprudencial evolution, the positioning of the Court, the respects of the main points of the work, as they are - in special - the "binding abridgement", the general repercussion and the modulation of the effect in the judgments of the court. During the chapter exploring the "binding abridgement" not only will be analyzed the general theory of the institute and the law of regency but also the principals will be coment verbets of the compendium of the Supreme Federal Court; its "usual" abridgement ( without the binding effect), that they say respect to the interposition, processing and judgment of the appeal to the Brazilian Supreme Court. The three initials will also be commented verbets of just implemented abridgement with binding effectiveness of the court. The general repercussion of turned constitutional question in the appeal to the Brazilian Supreme Court will be analyzed of one retrospect inside historical, when - exactly that without bigger intentions - to compare itself with the institute of the petition for certionari of past systems constitutional. It will also be analyzed in function of the foreign law, with small study (to the times comparative) with the North American right and institute of certorari. All the legislative set where inserted the general repercussion will be analyzed, of Constitutional Emendation Regimental n. 45/2004 to the Emendation Regimental-STF n. 21, that it disciplines it in the scope of the court. The initial decisions will be analyzed still that are, nowadays, concepts and forming them pillars of the institute, in the vision of the Supreme Federal Court. As everything how much it rees-echo, it reverberates positive negative or, the work will develop an item of that it has not cogitated the doctrine: the "" negative "" positive "general repercussion" as or as - and will explore, in this direction, the viability of such nomenclatures and until its effect. The modulation of the effect, wants if it integrates in the context of the intent control of unconstitutionality, wants it belongs to the diffuse control, minudentement will be analyzed. In this part, the work will analyze the jurisprudencial evolution of the institute in the Supreme Federal Court, making sweepings of the main decisions that have applied it or referenciad. Of form to not only demonstrate the jurisprudence of the court, but and mainly the evolution of the institute of the modulation of the effect to the long one of the times until the present. With the advent of art. 27 of Law 9,868/99 (that explicitament it foresees and it allows the posssibilite of the modulation of the effect in the judgments of direct actions of unconstitutionality), the institute took great breath in the supreme instance. It will be perceived that in some cases - and they they will be commented - of fact the Supreme Federal Court more of the one than necessary, must, to launch hand of possibilite in it checked so that its judgment is to one alone certain time, legal, just, efficient, productive - and accepted for the society. The modulation of the effect seems to be primordial item in the agenda of the Supreme Federal Court, also inside of the perspective of a constitutional jurisdiction. Subjects as the partisan allegiance cannot be analyzed under the influx of the modulation. As well as subjects in the Supreme Federal Court, many of them of bias tributary, as we will be able to observe in the course of the work, also are to demand a differentiated behavior of judgment. By the way, the work will not be stolen to examine an adjacent point in the context of the modulation of the effect: the possibility of the institute to be applied in the judgments of the Superior Courts. So controversial how much the question of the modulation of the effect in the constitutionality judgments will have of being our proposal of professional qualification for the practice of law in Superior Courts. One and another one - however - will be developed with the maximum intellectual honesty and in accordance with logical and coherent premises, exactly that - of remaining portion and in more - some can not agree to specific conclusions on these two particular - and controversial - of the work. We will present data of interest on the brazilian Judiciary Power - and, more necessarily, of proper the Supreme Federal Court and the appeal to the Brazilian Supreme Court, one of the vehicles that in it park. The study he will develop, still, some suggestions of uniformization of application of the common concepts to the processing of the kind of appeal Brazilian Supreme Court, therefore in many times the Supreme Federal Court and the Superior Court of Justice have different positionings regarding one same subject as, for example, the concept of prequestioning, its division in implicit and explicit and the regimen of the action for a provisional remedy ones for the loan of "supersedeas" to the appeals to the Brazilian Supreme Court and special, respectively. Finally, and always that opportune, the work will present suggestions of lege ferenda<br>Tal como desenvolveremos a presente dissertação, focaremos o estudo do próprio papel do Supremo Tribunal Federal, como órgão de cúpula do Judiciário brasileiro e sua vocação moderna de se tornar um Tribunal Constitucional. Para alcançar o desiderato pretendido, desenvolver-se-á um estudo a respeito do Supremo Tribunal Federal que abordará dados históricos e, conforme previsão da Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, a competência, a organização, a estrutura e a composição do tribunal. Estes temas têm, alguns ainda que indiretamente, ligação com o recurso extraordinário. Uma vez traçadas as linhas gerais a respeito do Supremo Tribunal Federal, desenvolver-se-á o estudo a respeito do recurso extraordinário onde terão lugar as origens históricas do instituto vertente inclusive sob o amparo do direito estrangeiro e os seus principais aspectos e pontos de interesse doutrinário, como o processamento, o prequestionamento, a comunicação de efeito suspensivo , a execução que se processa enquanto pendente o seu julgamento e a rescisão do acórdão nele proferido. O controle de constitucionalidade das leis e dos atos nornativos do Poder Público, de um lado; a questão da súmula vinculante , de outro; e, por fim, a nova roupagem do recurso extraordinário do que se destacam os institutos do prequestionamento, da repercussão geral, assim como seu conceito, natureza jurrídica, hipóteses de cabimento e o direito sumular a ele referente serão aordados ao longo do trabalho. A dissertação fará estudo pormenorizado da evolução legislativa concernente ao tema objeto do trabalho e, de forma bastante intensa, examinará também a evolução da jurisprudência do Supremo Tribunal Federal. Serão analisados acórdãos proferidos pelo Supremo desde épocas (bastante) pretéritas até os dias de hoje, procurando demonstrar a evolução jurisprudencial e o posicionamento da Corte a respeitos dos principais pontos do trabalho, como o sejam em especial a súmula vinculante , a repercussão geral e a modulação de efeitos nos julgamentos do tribunal. No capítulo atinente à súmula vinculante não apenas serão analisadas a teoria geral do instituto e a lei de regência como, inclusive, serão comentandos os principais verbetes do compêndio do Supremo Tribunal Federal, da sua súmula ordinária (leia-se: sem o efeito vinculante), que digam respeito à interposição, processamento e julgamento do recurso extraordinário. Serão comentados também os três iniciais verbetes da recém implementada súmula com eficácia vinculante do tribunal. A repercussão geral da questão constitucional versada no recurso extraordinário será analisada dentro de um retrospecto histórico, quando mesmo que sem maiores intenções se a comparar com o instituto da argüição de relevância de sistemas constitucionais pretéritos. Será analisada também em função do direito estrangeiro, com pequeno estudo (às vezes comparativo) com o direito norte-americano e o instituto do certiorari. Todo o conjunto legislativo em que inserida a repercussão geral será analisado, da Emenda Constitucional Regimental n. 45/2004 à Emenda Regimental-STF n. 21, que o disciplina no âmbito do tribunal. Serão analisadas ainda as iniciais decisões que estejam, nos dias de hoje, explicitando conceitos e formando os pilares do instituto, na visão do Supremo Tribunal Federal. A modulação dos efeitos, quer se integre no contexto do controle concentrado de constitucionalidade, quer pertença ao controle difuso, será minudentemente analisada. Nesta parte, o trabalho analisará a evolução jurisprudencial do instituto no Supremo Tribunal Federal, fazendo uma varredura das principais decisões que o tenham aplicado ou referenciado. De forma a demostrar não apenas a jurisprudência do tribunal, mas e principalmente a evolução do instituto da modulação dos efeitos ao longo dos tempos até os dias de hoje. Com o advento do art. 27 da Lei 9.868/99 (que explicitamente prevê e permite a posssibilidade da modulação dos efeitos nos julgamentos de ações diretas de inconstitucionalidade), o instituto tomou grande fôlego na instância suprema. Perceber-se-á que em alguns casos e eles serão comentados de fato o Supremo Tribunal Federal mais do que precisa, deve, lançar mão da(s) possibilidade(s) nele conferida(s) para que seu julgamento seja a um só tempo certo, jurídico, justo, eficaz, produtivo e aceito pela sociedade. A modulação dos efeitos parece ser item primordial na agenda do Supremo Tribunal Federal, inclusive dentro da perspectiva de uma jurisdição constitucional. Temas como a fidelidade partidária não podem ser analisados senão sob o influxo da modulação. Assim como temas pautados no Supremo Tribunal Federal, muitos deles de viés tributário, como poderemos observar no curso do trabalho, também estão a exigir uma conduta diferenciada de julgamento. Aliás, não se furtará o trabalho de examinar um ponto adjacente no contexto da modulação dos efeitos: a possibilidade de o instituto ser aplicado nos julgamentos dos Tribunais Superiores. Tão polêmica quanto a questão da modulação dos efeitos nos julgamentos de constitucionalidade haverá de ser nossa proposta de qualificação profissional para o exercício da advocacia em Tribunais Superiores. Uma e outra porém serão desenvolvidas com a máxima honestidade intelectual e de acordo com premissas lógicas e coerentes, mesmo que de resto e no mais alguns possam não concordar com as conclusões específicas sobre estes dois particulares e polêmicos itens do trabalho. Apresentaremos dados de interesse sobre o Poder Judiciário brasileiro e, mais precisamente, do próprio Supremo Tribunal Federal e do recurso extraordinário, um dos veículos que nele estacionam. O estudo desenvolverá, ainda, algumas sugestões de uniformização de aplicação dos conceitos comuns ao processamento do recurso especial, pois em muitas vezes o Supremo Tribunal Federal e o Superior Tribunal de Justiça têm posicionamentos diferentes a respeito de um mesmo assunto como, por exemplo, o conceito de prequestionamento, a sua divisão em implícito e explícito e o regime das cautelares para o empréstimo de efeito suspensivo aos recursos extraordinário e especial, respectivamente. Por fim, e sempre que oportuno, o trabalho apresentará sugestões de lege ferenda

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:25:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Joaquim Portes de Cerqueira Cesar.pdf: 693430 bytes, checksum: e1a33fab558a283e8d9bd5e03d87fb57 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006-12-19<br>The systematization of exceptional appeals in Parental Rights is notably complex, especially after the promulgation of 1988 Federal Constitution that created the appeal denominated special, aiming mainly at keeping the wholeness of the federal right, remaining the constitutional litigation to the extraordinary appeal. The multiple questions that emerge from the exceptional appeals obliges the interpreter to search for references in a context of parameters that are not almost always systematic, where jurisprudential orientation, abridgements and unequal doctrinal positioning proliferate. The present work aims to approach the issues of exceptional appeals regarding to the Special and Extraordinary Appeals, descrying as basic orientating premises the jurisprudential issues condensed in the Stare Decisis, analyzing the casuistic forensics in the area as well. The objective is to dissipate common errors and to create a general overview of solutions that superior courts have been adopting so that a peculiar jurisdictional tutelage inherent to this mode of exceptional appeal becomes feasible<br>A sistemática dos recursos excepcionais no Direito Pátrio é notavelmente complexa, sobretudo após a promulgação da Constituição Federal de 1988, que criou o denominado recurso especial, com objetivo precípuo de manter a inteireza do direito federal, remanescendo ao recurso extraordinário o contencioso constitucional. As múltiplas questões que emergem no âmbito dos recursos excepcionais obrigam o intérprete a buscar referências em um contexto de parâmetros quase sempre assistemáticos, em que proliferam orientações jurisprudenciais, Súmulas e posicionamentos doutrinários díspares. O presente trabalho objetiva abordar as questões recursais excepcionais atinentes aos Recursos Especial e Extraordinário, divisando como premissa orientadora básica as questões jurisprudenciais compendiadas no Direito Sumular, com análise também da casuística forense nesse campo. Buscase, assim, dissipar equívocos comuns e construir um panorama geral das soluções que os pretórios superiores vêm adotando para viabilizar a peculiar tutela jurisdicional inerente a essas modalidades de recursos excepcionais

ALes instances civile et pénale parallèles suscitent des risques de contrariétés que le droit positif prévient traditionnellement par l'utilisation de la règle de l'autorité du pénal sur le civil et du sursis à statuer de l'article 4 du Code de procédure pénale. Or ce double mécanisme de la primauté du pénal sur le civil est tout à fait singulier. Il assure en effet une cohérence entre les motifs des décisions concernées, dont le droit positif ne se soucie guère au sein des autres contentieux. Il est de plus unilatéral, puisqu'il ne joue qu'au bénéfice des décisions pénales. Justifié initialement par l'importance et les garanties de vérité des décisions pénales, il s'avère cependant, à l'analyse, largement discutable. Quant à ses fondements d'abord, ce mécanisme assure certes une certaine cohérence des choses jugées, mais maintient une apparence de vérité plus qu'il ne la garantit. Or précisément, la cohérence entre motifs de jugements distincts n'est légitime qu'autant qu'elle sert l'objectif de vérité. Quant à son régime, ensuite, l'autorité du pénal sur le civil entrave la liberté du juge civil et viole, par son caractère absolu, le principe du contradictoire, tandis qu'une application systématique du sursis à statuer est source de lenteur des procédures et contrevient à l'objectif de célérité. Afin de pallier ces inconvénients, le législateur et la jurisprudence se sont d'abord efforcés de restreindre les effets les plus néfastes de ce principe, en dissociant les concepts civils et répressifs, puis en le cantonnant étroitement. Néanmoins, l'objectif de célérité l'a finalement emporté, et le législateur, par la loi du 5 mars 2007, n'a maintenu le caractère obligatoire du sursis à statuer de l'article 4 qu'à l'égard de l'action civile en réparation du dommage né de l'infraction. Le nouveau dispositif consacre désormais le principe d'une indépendance des procédures parallèles, au risque de l'incohérence, même si pour l'heure les juridictions du fond tiennent compte du risque de contrariété et maintiennent la règle de l'autorité du pénal sur le civil. Il conviendrait néanmoins de revenir sur cette dernière règle, et d'attribuer aux énonciations qui constituent le soutien nécessaire de la décision pénale, la valeur d'une présomption réfragable de vérité. Il serait ainsi tenu compte des spécificités des décisions pénales, de même que seraient préservées les exigences, parfois antagonistes, d'autonomie des juridictions, de cohérence des choses jugées, et de recherche de vérité<br>AWhen civil and penal proceedings occur in parallel, there is a risk of conflicting judgments, which positive law traditionally precludes by making penal proceedings paramount and by deferring adjudication on article 4 of the Criminal Code. This double mechanism, which ensures supremacy of criminal proceedings over civil proceedings, is quite singular. Indeed, it guarantees that the justifications for the decisions made are coherent. In other contentious matters, positive law pays little attention to such concerns. Moreover, it is unilateral, since it exclusively favours criminal law decisions. Though this supremacy was initially justified by the notion that criminal law decisions guaranteed truth, analysis has shown that this is largely debatable. First of all, with regard to the foundations themselves, this mechanism of course ensures a certain coherence of the matters judged, but maintains an appearance of truth rather than a guarantee of truth. Yet, precisely, the coherence of the justifications for distinct judgments is only legitimate insofar as it seeks to determine the truth. Then with regard to the system itself, the supremacy of criminal over civil proceedings interferes with the freedom of the civil judge, and violates by its absolute nature, the adversarial principle, while the systematic deferral of adjudication slows down procedures and undermines the objective of celerity. In order to remedy these drawbacks, legislators and jurisprudence have made an effort to limit the most damaging effects of this principle, by dissociating civil from repressive concepts, then by compartmentalising each within strict limits. Nevertheless, the objective of celerity finally won the day and legislators, through the law of 5th March 2007, retained the compulsory nature of the deferral of adjudication of article 4, but only with regard to civil action for damages resulting from the offence. The new law now establishes the principle of independence of parallel proceedings, even though it carries a risk of conflicting results. For the time being, however, the jurisdictions take into account the risk of conflicting results and have maintained the supremacy of criminal proceedings over civil proceedings. It is nonetheless desirable to revise the recent law, and to incorporate in the reasons which are necessary support for the criminal decision, the value of a refragable presumption of truth. The specific nature of decisions in criminal proceedings would thus be taken into account, and the sometimes antagonistic requirement of autonomy of the different jurisdictions, the coherence of the matters being judged, and the search for truth would thus be preserved

A lentidão processual é um indicador de ineficiência da justiça e também uma de suas causas. A normal duração dos processos cíveis está comprometida por uma série de fatores, tais como o aumento da litigiosidade, a falta de infraestrutura dos órgãos judiciários e insuficiente utilização das novas tecnologias da informação, a deficiente formação dos juízes e advogados e, particularmente, a falta de efetiva repressão às más condutas dos sujeitos processuais. Este trabalho tem por escopo identificar as condutas processuais irregulares causadoras ou contributivas para a morosidade e traçar parâmetros objetivos para sua repressão. Para tanto, foram estudados os principais aspectos relativos ao comportamento abusivo dos sujeitos processuais que violam o direito à razoável duração do processo e trazem prejuízos processuais e extraprocessuais, tanto às partes envolvidas no litígio, quanto à dignidade da jurisdição. O trabalho busca demonstrar, portanto, que ética, compromisso e cooperação são peçaschave na solução do intrincado problema da lentidão processual e que, para resolvê-lo, não são necessárias alterações legislativas: a adequada aplicação dos atuais mecanismos repressores das condutas iníquas, à luz desses valores, é suficiente para a garantia da razoável duração do processo.<br>The slowness of judicial procedures is a symptom of the inefficiency of justice and is also one of its causes. The usual duration of civil proceedings is jeopardized by a number of factors, such as the increase in litigiousness, the lack of infrastructure of the judiciary bodies and insufficient use of the new information technologies, the deficient educational level of judges and lawyers, and particularly the absence of an effective repression to abusive conducts of the parties to a lawsuit. The scope of this paper is to identify the improper procedural practices that give rise or contribute to the slowness of justice and to establish objective parameters to repress it. For such purpose, a study was performed on the main aspects related to abusive practices carried out by the litigants, which infringe the right to a reasonable length of proceedings, and bring about an adverse effect in court and out of court, both to the parties involved in the litigation and to the dignity of the jurisdiction. Therefore, the paper searches to demonstrate that ethics, commitment, and cooperation are key components to the solution of the intricate problem of procedural slowness, and that no legislative amendments are required to solve it: in light of such values, the proper application of the existing repressive mechanisms for inequitable conducts is sufficient to guarantee the reasonable length of court proceedings.