Academic literature on the topic 'Arbitral decisions'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Arbitral decisions.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Arbitral decisions"

1

Prytyka, Yu, and D. Prytyka. "NEWLY REFORMED PROCEEDINGS OF THE ARBITRATION AWARDS REVIEW AND INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AWARDS APPEAL IN CIVIL PROCEDURAL LEGISLATION OF UKRAINE." Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal Studies, no. 110 (2019): 29–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2019/3.110-6.

Full text
Abstract:
This article deals with the novelties of the reformed procedural legislation of Ukraine on appealing the decision of arbitration court and international commercial arbitration, as well as on new approaches to determining the legal nature of the proceedings in cases of appealing arbitration awards. At the same time, this study shows that the specific practical problems of a unified approach to terminology absence, in particular, "appeal" by arbitral tribunal or "challenge" by international commercial arbitration, still remain. In this article the problems of determining the objects of appeal and the expansion of the range of subjects of appeal against the decisions of arbitral tribunals, as well as the disputable issues, determining the jurisdiction of this category of cases are also considered. Special attention is paid to the examining the procedure for reviewing applications for annulment of decisions of the arbitral tribunal and international commercial arbitration, in particular the initial stage of production, time limits for challenging the arbitration award. Taking this into account, authors identify the ways to resolve the abovementioned practical problems, as well as the prospects for further reform of the judicial review institution over the enforcement of arbitral tribunals and international commercial arbitration decisions. In conclusion, authors prove, that the activity of national courts does not include the revision of the decisions of arbitration courts and international commercial arbitrations, since national courts do not check the legality and validity of the decisions; they do not review the substantive decision. In this case we consider a special mechanism for the control over the abuse of arbitrators' powers granted to them by law and by the parties to the arbitration agreement during the dispute resolution.The purpose of an appeal is to provide the interested party with the opportunity to apply limited judicial review of the arbitral award.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Kravtsov, S. "THE APPEAL OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AWARDS AS A FORM OF JUDICAL CONTROL BY NATIONAL COURTS." Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal Studies, no. 110 (2019): 8–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2019/3.110-2.

Full text
Abstract:
The appeal of the international commercial arbitration awards is a major issue in the dispute settlement mechanism for arbitration governed by multilateral conventions, bilateral treaties and national laws, as well as by the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958. Notwithstanding the importance of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958, it restricts to a certain extent the scope of legal protection of arbitral awards, as it leaves national courts to challenge them by the way of possible annulment, and national courts when considering petitions for annulment decisions are vested in the power to revoke such decisions. In this respect, the resolution of these issues may raise the issue of the correlation between the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 and domestic legislation of the countries in which the relevant decision may be challenged. The specific of the international commercial arbitration decision is that it cannot be appealed to any higher court. However, the absence of any form of control over the arbitral award could lead to the enforcement of such decisions, which, if rendered within the judicial system, would be overturned or modified by a higher court. Therefore, there is an institution for challenging arbitral awards in national courts. Due to the fact that the arbitration award is a form of control by national courts, the regulation of this institution is defined in the legislation of each individual country, and at the international legal level only certain aspects are regulated. These are the European Convention of 1961 and the New York Convention of 1958.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Viñuales, Jorge, and Frank Spoorenberg. "Conflicting Decisions in International Arbitration." Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 8, no. 1 (2009): 91–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157180309x429669.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThere has been much discussion recently, both in academic and practitioner circles, about inconsistency in international arbitration. The debate has concentrated on specific topics such as contradictory arbitral awards, the precedential value of arbitral awards, the creation of an appeal system, or the need for increased transparency. The present study argues that such debate has overlooked the fact that some, and perhaps most, of the perceived problems are a reflection of the underlying values that make international arbitration appealing to international economic actors. Specifically, the authors argue that instead of concentrating on far-reaching reforms, commentators should focus on refining currently existing techniques to deal with conflicting decisions in international arbitration.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Uzelac, A. "Number of Arbitrators and Decisions of Arbitral Tribunals." Arbitration International 23, no. 4 (December 1, 2007): 573–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/23.4.573.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Calamita, Nicolas Jansen, and Elsa Sardinha. "The Bifurcation of Jurisdictional and Admissibility Objections in Investor-State Arbitration." Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 16, no. 1 (June 21, 2017): 44–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341341.

Full text
Abstract:
The practice of arbitral tribunals is notably consistent with respect to articulating the fundamental values which need to be balanced in deciding whether to bifurcate preliminary objections with respect to jurisdiction or admissibility. Moreover, there is substantial consensus on the issues or factors which ought to be evaluated by arbitral tribunals exercising their discretion under the relevant rules. What the decisions appear to lack, however, is rigorous evaluation of the likely time and costs effects of the decision to bifurcate or not. Ensuring that the parties produce information relevant to the decision whether to bifurcate rests with tribunals and the way in which they manage the proceedings before them. Tribunals ought not rely upon the parties to produce such information on their own. Instead, tribunals can and should proactively request such information in order to better carry out their judicial function. Improving the analytical rigour and depth of the analysis behind bifurcation decisions would not only improve tribunals’ conclusions, but also bolster the legitimacy of those decisions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Metsch, Rutger, and Rémy Gerbay. "Prospect Theory and due process paranoia: what behavioural models say about arbitrators’ assessment of risk and uncertainty." Arbitration International 36, no. 2 (June 1, 2020): 233–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiaa017.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The term ‘due process paranoia’ is used to describe a perceived reluctance by arbitral tribunals to act decisively in certain situations for fear of the arbitral award being challenged on the basis of a party not having had the chance to present its case fully. This article approaches due process paranoia from the perspective of Prospect Theory, which is a behavioural model describing how individuals make decisions under risk and uncertainty. The authors examine how Prospect Theory’s insight that decision makers tend to overweight low-probability events in their decision-making (the ‘possibility effect’) affects decision-making by arbitrators when faced with the threat of challenge to their awards on due process grounds (the ‘enforcement risk’). The article concludes that the possibility effect is prone to contribute to an overweighting by arbitrators of the enforcement risk, thereby explaining the perceived tendency by tribunals to make sub-optimal decisions when faced with due process-related complaints or threats.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Antonov, Mikhail. "Foreign Court Decisions, Arbitral Awards and Sovereignty in Russia." Review of Central and East European Law 38, no. 3-4 (2013): 317–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15730352-00000006.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter examines a number of theoretical difficulties related to the implementation, in Russia, of the decisions and awards of foreign courts and arbitral tribunals. Along with the normative conditions for recognizing and enforcing foreign decisions, the author draws attention to the educational background of legal professionals— especially judges—in Russia. It is suggested that the statist conception of law inherited from Soviet legal scholarship implicitly leads to the contemporary Russian legal doctrine of negating the obligatory force of decisions from foreign courts. In the opinion of the author, the core of this conception resides in the traditional concept of sovereignty, which excludes the direct effect of legal acts made by foreign states, private arbitration tribunals, and international organizations. Nevertheless, there have been signs of a change in the attitude of the Russian judiciary in several key rulings by commercial courts. The author concludes that one now can observe seeing tendencies indicative of the development of a different concept of law in the mentality of legal professionals in Russia.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Mendes Barbosa, Daniel, and Aline Lima Pessoa de Mendonça. "APONTAMENTOS SOBRE A ILEGITMIDADE DAS DECISÕES POR EQUIDADE NA ARBITRAGEM (ITEMS ON THE ILLEGITIMACY OF EQUITY DECISIONS IN ARBITRATION)." Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça 3, no. 1 (June 1, 2017): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/indexlawjournals/2017.v3i1.1948.

Full text
Abstract:
O presente trabalho busca analisar a legitimidade das decisões proferidas por equidade no procedimento arbitral. Isso porque, ao se permitir que a equidade seja utilizada para fundamentar uma decisão, os destinatários da mesma não se reconhecerão como autores e, por conseguinte, a decisão proferida nada mais será que a visão idiossincrática do julgador em relação ao óbice apesentado para resolução. Com isso, o devido processo legal restará violado e a decisão, de acordo com o paradigma democrático, não será legitima. Através do método dedutivo, demonstrar-se-á a ilegitimidade das decisões proferidas por equidade. This work aims to examine the legitimacy of the decisions of equity in the arbitral proceeding. This because, allowing equity is used to support a decision, the recipients will not recognize _ as authors and therefore the decision is nothing more than a idiosyncratic vision of the judge regarding the dispute submitted to resolution. Thus, due process remain infringed and the decision, according to the democratic paradigm will not be legitimate. Through deductive method, will be demonstrating the illegitimacy of decisions of equity.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Crow, Stephen M., James W. Logan, and Lillian Y. Fok. "Illicit Drug Effects in Labor Arbitration Decision Making." Journal of Drug Issues 24, no. 3 (July 1994): 489–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002204269402400309.

Full text
Abstract:
Two hundred twenty-six arbitration outcomes in alcohol and drug disciplinary cases were investigated to examine illicit drug effects on arbitral decision making. We examined these effects on arbitrators' final decisions and the standards or decision cues that arbitrators use to justify their decisions. We also examined interactions of illicit drugs and standards of proof and looked at decisions in two different time spans to determine if changing societal attitudes about alcohol and drugs might have an effect. In this study, arbitrators were less lenient with illicit drug users than with legal drug users. This finding suggests that an illicit drug effect may exist in other distributive justice scenarios.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Chen, Meng, and Chengzhi Wang. "Vanishing Set-Aside Authority in International Commercial Arbitration." International and Comparative Law Review 18, no. 1 (June 1, 2018): 127–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2018-0029.

Full text
Abstract:
Summary Traditional set-aside theory is subject to considerable challenges as a result of an uncompromising trend towards autonomy and internationalism in international arbitration. The silence and ambiguity of international law regarding enforcement of set-aside arbitral awards allow some states to abandon their own set-aside authority or ignore set-aside decisions made by competent courts. This article presents a range of evidence that demonstrates the enforcement of set-aside arbitral awards has become a common phenomenon. This article first introduces robust academic debates regarding set-aside authority. Then this article exposes omission and ambiguity in the legal source, which leads to confusion in enforcement proceedings of set-aside arbitral awards. This article describes and analyses selected cases and practical data in order to summarize the approaches taken by national courts when reviewing foreign set-aside decisions. Finally, this article briefly evaluates the most promising solutions to the contradictory enforcement proceedings of set-aside arbitral awards.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Arbitral decisions"

1

Gómez, Arbeláez Fernando Alfonso. "The binding effect of international arbitral and judicial decisions." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1995. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.627655.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Valverde, Gianpierre, and Nadine Márquez. "Review or not review, there is the dilemma: brief reflections on the impugnability of dispute boards’ decisions on the arbitral route." THĒMIS-Revista de Derecho, 2018. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/123849.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of this article is to highlight the probable contingencies that could arise as a result of the review of the decisions of the Dispute Boards in the arbitration. To achieve this, the structure of the article is arranged in such a way as to facilitate the understanding of the conclusions.In that sense, first, the nature and function of the Dispute Boards is defined. The classes and advantages offered by these dispute resolution mechanisms are then indicated. Subsequently, the legal provision is analyzed in order to crumble its contents. The article ends with the analysis of the effects generated by reviewing the decisions of the Dispute Boards.
El presente artículo tiene la finalidad de evidenciar las probables contingencias que podrían producirse a causa de la revisión de las decisiones de los Dispute Boards en la vía arbitral. Para llegar a ello, la estructura del artículo se encuentra ordenada de tal manera que facilitará la comprensión de las conclusiones.En ese sentido, primero, se define la naturaleza y la función de los Dispute Boards. Luego, se señala las clases y ventajas que ofrecen estos mecanismos de solución de controversias. Posteriormente, se analiza la disposición legal con la finalidad de desmenuzar su contenido. Se finaliza el artículo con la exposición de los efectos producidos a causa de la revisión de estas decisiones.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Onyeani, Onyema Awa. "The obligation of host states to accord the standard of 'full protection and security' to foreign investments under international investment law." Thesis, Brunel University, 2018. http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/16087.

Full text
Abstract:
The analysis of this thesis is to examine whether foreign investors can fully rely on the standard of FPS in BITs for the protection of their investments in the territories of host States which has been mandated to States by international law. This question cannot be answered without giving insights into the content and structure of the origin of FPS standard and adopts a dynamic based-perspective of the interpretation of FPS under VCLT 1969, encompassing the relationship between FPS and CIL. It investigates the tribunals' interpretation of the clause using case laws and literatures to identify and explore the underlying explanatory process behind tribunals' case findings and outcomes. The study examines the critical realism that the obligation of FPS standard does not place absolute liability to a host State, rather the exercise of a reasonable degree of vigilance. It evaluates the controversy surrounding the relationships between FPS and FET, and illuminates on how the two standards may co-evolve which has led to various arbitral tribunals' divergence opinions interpretation of the two principles. The evaluation of the application of FPS to digital assets is dynamic in this research as it addresses the nature of threats investors face globally today over cyber attacks of digital investments. The thesis also emphasis on balancing up investors' rights and obligation, which explains the measures that States can apply to prevent foreign investors from engaging in illegitimate activities. Having look at all these issues, circumstances, and the controversies surrounding FPS standard, the result found is that there is a existence of a gap in this area of the law, that would mean that foreign investors cannot completely rely on the principle of FPS for the protection of their investments in the territories of the host unless this lacunae is properly filled by both the States and arbitral tribunals, especially the tribunals' interpretative meaning of the standard of FPS.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Bernadskaya, Elena. "La sentence arbitrale internationale : contribution de droit processuel comparé (droit français et droit russe)." Thesis, Lyon 3, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011LYO30084.

Full text
Abstract:
La sentence est une notion complexe qui partage différentes caractéristiques avec le contrat, l’acte juridictionnel ou la décision de justice. En effet, la nature juridictionnelle de la sentence est aujourd’hui admise, mais en raison de son origine conventionnelle, elle demeure un acte privé. Ainsi, son régime d’acte juridictionnel est-Il modifié par un élément conventionnel – dès la désignation des arbitres appelés à rendre la sentence jusqu’à son exécution. L’étude du droit comparé montre que la notion et le régime de la sentence sont différemment appréciés en droit français et russe – tout est question d’interprétation des critères de qualification, bien qu’ils s’avèrent être les mêmes. Ainsi, convient-Il de faire ressortir ces différences à travers l’étude de la notion de la sentence et de son régime dans les deux ordres juridiques, sauf à démontrer que l’une et l’autre contribuent à la préservation du caractère particulier de la sentence qui ne peut et ne doit pas être assimilée, en définitive, à une décision de justice
The arbitral award is a complex legal notion, sharing characteristics with the contract, the jurisdictional act and the judicial decision. Indeed, the jurisdictional dimension of the arbitral award has now been admitted, though, because of its contractual source, it is still considered as a private legal act. The legal regime of this jurisdictional act is therefore influenced by a contractual bias – as from the arbitrators’ appointment up to the enforcement of the arbitral award. A comparative approach shows that the arbitral award’s notion and legal regime are differently considered in French and Russian laws. The differences lie mainly in the interpretation of the legal qualification criteria, though the latter are similar in the two legal systems. The purpose of this analysis is to identify the said differences through the study of the arbitral award’s notion and legal regime in French and Russian laws, which might lead to consider that the specificity of the arbitral award should be preserved instead of considering the award as a judicial decision
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Silva, Olympio José Matos Leite de Carvalho e. "A prescrição no direito internacional privado brasileiro." Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2012. http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=4276.

Full text
Abstract:
Este trabalho trata do funcionamento da prescrição extintiva relacionada a ações pessoais, além da decadência, no âmbito do direito internacional privado. Primeiramente é feita uma breve análise histórica e comparatista do direito de regência da prescrição em relações de caráter internacional antes de se demonstrar a solução abarcada pelo direito brasileiro: a regência pela lei que rege a obrigação (lex causae). Apesar de ser um instituto de direito civil, substantivo, a prescrição possui muitas ligações com o direito processual, uma vez que o principal efeito de sua consumação é tonar inexigível uma obrigação e, em decorrência, pôr fim a um processo. Assim, o autor detalha em seguida as questões que são regidas pela lex causae e as que são regidas pela lex fori (aqui abrangendo também a lex arbitri) em matéria de prescrição no direito brasileiro, antes de tratar minuciosamente de como se opera a exceção da ordem pública para afastar a aplicação da lex causae estrangeira em matéria de prescrição no Brasil (incluindo também regras de aplicação imediata lois de police brasileiras). Ao final, cuida-se da prescrição na homologação e execução de sentenças estrangeiras no Brasil.
This work deals with the operation of limitation periods (prescription) related to actions in personam in the domain of the conflict of laws. It starts with a historical and comparatist analysis of its governing law in international relations before the rule adopted by the Brazilian law is shown: the law of the obligation as the governing law of the limitation rules (lex causae). Although limitation of actions is considered a substantive issue under Brazilian law, it is closely connected with procedural law in many aspects, since its main effect is to render an obligation unenforceable and thus terminate a lawsuit. Therefore, the author presents in detail the issues that are governed by the lex causae and the issues that are governed by the lex fori (also comprising the lex arbitri) related to limitations under Brazilian law, before he deals thoroughly with the operation of the public policy exception to the application of a foreign lex causae in such a matter (also comprising Brazilian imperative rules lois de police). And finally, this work handles the operation of statutes of limitation in proceedings for recognition and enforcement of foreign judicial and arbitral decisions in Brazil.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Cirano, González Marco Andrés. "Facultad del Tribunal de Arbitraje CIADI para postergar su decisión en jurisdicción." Tesis, Universidad de Chile, 2019. http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/170386.

Full text
Abstract:
Memoria para optar al grado de licenciado en ciencias jurídicas y sociales
Esta investigación jurisprudencial surge a raíz de ciertas interrogantes planteadas por el denominado “Caso Clarín” (Víctor Pey Casado y Fundación Salvador Allende c. República de Chile). Específicamente, el objeto investigado alude a la decisión de postergar tomada por su Tribunal. Se pretende indagar qué argumentos ha esgrimido la jurisprudencia internacional en arbitraje sobre inversión al momento de posponer la resolución de una objeción jurisdiccional. En concreto, comprobar si es cierto que adjudicar en jurisdicción corresponde al ejercicio de una facultad primeramente preliminar, exponer además qué circunstancias se han invocado para desviarse de dicha regla y excepcionalmente realizar el examen pertinente junto con el fondo de la controversia Desde luego, el lenguaje del Artículo 41(2) del Convenio CIADI parece expresar cierta neutralidad, cuando faculta al Tribunal para determinar si ha de resolver en jurisdicción como “cuestión previa o conjuntamente con el fondo”. Sin embargo, este informe procura demostrar que, según jurisprudencia contemporánea al “Caso Clarín”, por regla general el aspecto jurisdiccional debe ser resuelto preliminarmente. Dicha afirmación tiene como justificación principal la tensión que existe entre posponer y el principio de consensualidad. De acuerdo con este último, las partes en conflicto arbitral pueden ser compelidas a litigar solo en la medida de su consentimiento, y en términos prácticos postergar supone una imposición arbitraria del proceso sobre la parte demandada. Se ha concluido que el carácter ambivalente de algunas defensas preliminares impide resolver en jurisdicción como cuestión previa. Circunstancia que, a su vez, se manifiesta a partir de hechos o argumentos legales sobre hechos con una doble pertinencia normativa. Que de modo simultáneo pueden ser referidos tanto al aspecto jurisdiccional como al fondo controvertido, de forma tal que una decisión al respecto supone una exposición del proceso al riesgo de prejuzgar la controversia
31 mayo de 2020
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Madrid, Horna Víctor. "Adopción de decisiones en la Ley de Arbitraje." Derecho & Sociedad, 2017. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/117214.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

González, de León Berini Arturo. "La concreción del castigo : el ejercicio legítimo del arbitrio judicial en las decisiones individualizadoras, desde un enfoque fenomenológico." Doctoral thesis, Universitat Abat Oliba, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/454745.

Full text
Abstract:
La present tesi doctoral té com a objectiu primordial escometre un estudi renovador, interdisciplinari, i en profunditat, sobre una de les qüestions avui dia més paradoxals en la ciència del Dret penal: l'anomenada “individualització judicial de la sanció”. Això és així perquè, per una banda, la decisió de l'òrgan sentenciador, que concreta el càstig, té una gran importància per a la vida del delinqüent –o, per ventura, és el mateix un que quatre anys de presó, amb totes les conseqüències que poden derivar-se? I de l'altra, però, no hi ha un tractament doctrinal o jurisprudencial de la matèria que sigui adequat a l’estatut processal i material d'aquesta funció, a la qual JESCHECK es refereix com l’autèntic "zenit" de l'activitat forense. La investigació es divideix en tres blocs successius, corresponents a l'estructura interna del treball. En primer lloc, i ja després d'una visió crítica del panorama actual, plantejo la necessitat d'un canvi de paradigma "instrumental"; aleshores suggereixo una aproximació conceptual i sistemàtica pròpia al dit tema. Després concentro l’anàlisi en les seves vessants iusfilosòfica i "adjectiva" (poc desenvolupades fins ara): la concreció del càstig és un procés decisori del jutge a quo, qui exerceix –i aquí d’una manera molt especial– amplis marges d'arbitri; així, ha d'estar sotmesa al control ad quem, per tal de revisar-ne la seva licitud. Finalment, i davant els diversos intents de racionalitzar aquesta tasca (de caràcter teleològic o dogmàtic), proposo un mètode alternatiu: la fenomenologia jurídica com una "eina" per quantificar la pena, a la recerca de criteris intersubjectius que siguin acceptables a la "communis opinio".
La presente tesis doctoral tiene como objetivo principal acometer un estudio renovador, interdisciplinar y en profundidad sobre una de las cuestiones hoy más paradójicas en la ciencia del Derecho penal: la llamada individualización judicial de la sanción. Ello es así porque, por un lado, la decisión del órgano sentenciador, que concreta el castigo, tiene una gran importancia para la vida del reo –¿acaso es lo mismo uno que cuatro años de prisión, con todas las secuelas que pueden derivarse? Y, de otra parte, sin embargo, no existe un tratamiento doctrinal o jurisprudencial de la materia que sea acorde con el estatuto procesal y material de dicha función, a la que JESCHECK se refiere como el verdadero “cénit” de la actividad forense. La investigación se divide en tres bloques sucesivos, que no en vano corresponden con la estructura interna de mi trabajo. En primer lugar, tras una visión crítica del panorama actual, planteo la necesidad de un cambio de paradigma “instrumental”, y de este modo sugiero una aproximación conceptual y sistemática propia al tema. Luego centro el análisis en sus vertientes iusfilosófica y “adjetiva” (poco desarrolladas hasta el momento): la concreción del castigo es un proceso decisorio del juez a quo, quien ejerce –aquí especialmente– un amplio margen de arbitrio, y por ende debe estar sometido al control ad quem para revisar su licitud. Por último, frente a los diversos intentos de racionalizar tal labor (de carácter teleológico o dogmático), propongo un método alternativo al respecto: la fenomenología jurídica como una “herramienta” para cuantificar la pena, en busca de criterios intersubjetivos que sean aceptables por la “communis opinio”.
The doctoral dissertation mainly aims at undertaking a renewing, interdisciplinary and indepth study about one of the most paradoxical questions in Criminal Law nowadays: the so-called "sentencing phase of trial". Why so? On the one hand, since this judicial decision specifying a due punishment has a significant importance for the convict’s life: or is it the same serving one or four years in prison –taking into consideration all the attached effects to it? However, on the other hand, there is no academic or case-law treatment of the subject-matter that is in real accordance with the procedural and material status of the above-said task, to which JESCHECK refers as the genuine "peak" of judges’ activity. My research is here divided in three successive parts, now corresponding to the internal structure of the work. First of all, after a critical review of the current scenario, I advocate the need for an “instrumental” turnaround, thus suggesting my own (conceptual and systematic) approach to this issue. I later focus the analysis on its philosophical and “adjective” aspects, which have been little addressed until now: concrete sentencing is a decision- making process of the judge a quo, who exercises –specially at this point– a broad margin of discretion; therefore, it must be controlled by an ad quem court making sure of its legality. Finally, before several attempts to “rationalize” it (teleological or dogmatic), I propose another method: legal phenomenology as a “tool” for quantifying a punishment, in search of intersubjective criteria ready to be passable by the "communis opinio”.
Diese Dissertation zielt vor allem darauf ab, eine erneuerte, interdisziplinäre und eingehende Untersuchung über eine der heute paradoxesten Themen des Strafrechtswissenschaft durchzuführen: die so genannte "Strafzumessung". Warum ist das so? Einerseits, als diese gerichtliche Entscheidung, die eine Strafmaß angibt, eine wichtigsten Bedeutung für das Leben des Täters hat –oder vielleicht ist es das gleiche, dass er nur ein oder vier Jahre im Gefängnis ist, wobei alle damit verbundenen Wirkungen berücksichtigt werden? Auf der anderen Seite gibt es jedoch keine akademische oder rechtsprechende Behandlung des Gegenstands, die in Übereinstimmung mit dem prozessualen und materiellen Status der oben genannten Aufgabe steht, auf die sich JESCHECK als den echten "Höhepunkt" der Spruchtätigkeit des Richters bezieht. Meine Forschung ist hier in drei aufeinanderfolgenden Teilen geteilt, die nun der inneren Struktur des Werkes entsprechen. Zunächst einmal, nach einer kritischen Überprüfung des aktuellen Szenarios, befürworte ich die Notwendigkeit eines "instrumentalen" Paradigma Wandel, und damit meinen eigenen (konzeptuellen und systematischen) Ansatz zu dieser Frage. Ich spüre später die Analyse auf ihre philosophischen und prozessualen Aspekte, die bislang wenig angesprochen wurden: konkrete Verurteilung ist ein Entscheidungsprozess des a quo Richters, der –besonders an dieser Stelle– einen breiten Diskussionsspielraum ausübt. Deshalb muss es von einem ad quem Gericht kontrolliert 7 werden, um sicherzustellen, darüber seine Rechtmäßigkeit. Schließlich schlage ich –vor einigen Versuchen, sie (teleologisch oder dogmatisch) zu "rationalisieren"– eine andere Methode vor: die Phänomenologie des Rechts als "Werkzeug" zur Quantifizierung einer Strafe, auf der Suche nach intersubjektiven Kriterien, die für die "communis opinio" annehmbar sind.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Debourg, Claire. "Les contrariétés de décisions dans l’arbitrage international." Thesis, Paris 10, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011PA100070.

Full text
Abstract:
Les contrariétés de décisions de justice sont extrêmement nocives. D’une part, elles représentent une menace pour la cohérence du droit. D’autre part, elles pèsent lourd sur la situation des parties, mettant ces dernières dans des situations inextricables. En tant que mode juridictionnel de règlement des litiges, l’arbitrage international n’échappe pas à ce phénomène. Au contraire, les spécificités de la matière en font un terrain de prédilection pour le développement des contrariétés de décisions. En effet, les contrariétés résultent de la conduite parallèle de procédures portant sur des questions litigieuses identiques, sur lesquelles sont portées des appréciations divergentes. Or, l’arbitrage international se présente comme un facteur d’aggravation de ces causes classiques de contrariété, à savoir la concurrence juridictionnelle et l’incohérence des solutions. Le risque de contrariété y est à la fois fréquent et varié. Il se présente dans diverses configurations, opposant tantôt des décisions étatiques d’encadrement de l’arbitrage, tantôt une sentence arbitrale et une décision étatique ou encore deux sentences arbitrales.En dépit de la gravité du problème et de la fréquence du risque de contrariété, l’arbitrage international paraît mal armé pour y faire face. Il est confronté d’une part aux limites de l’efficacité des remèdes curatifs, qui se contentent souvent d’écarter la contrariété d’un territoire donné, et, d’autre part aux difficultés de mise en œuvre des remèdes préventifs
The phenomenon of conflicting decisions is extremely hazardous. On the one hand, they represent a threat to the coherence of the legal systems. On the other hand, it places a burden on the parties, putting them in an inextricable situation. Being a jurisdictional dispute resolution method, international arbitration does not escape this phenomenon. On the contrary, the specificities of arbitration make it the territory of predilection for the appearance of conflicting decisions. In fact, conflicting decisions result from the conduction of parallel proceedings concerning identical issues, which receive a different analysis. International arbitration aggravates the classical causes resulting in conflicting decisions. These causes are the competition between jurisdictions and the incoherence of the solutions.The risk of the existence of conflicting decisions is frequent and it presents itself is several manners. It can oppose national courts’ decisions assisting and controlling the arbitration, an arbitral award and a national court’s decision or even two arbitral awards.Despite the gravity of the problem and the frequency of the risk of having conflicting decisions, international arbitration seems unarmed to deal with it. Firstly, it is confronted with the limited efficiency of the curative solutions, and secondly, with the difficulties of applying preventive solutions
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Elatafy, Sherif. "La responsabilité des centres d'arbitrage." Thesis, Lyon, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016LYSE3013/document.

Full text
Abstract:
Les litigants sollicitent les centres d’arbitrage pour diriger l’arbitrage dans toutes ses phases afin de donner une garantie supplémentaire qui assure la validité de la sentence arbitrale. Compte tenu du rôle important que les centres d’arbitrage jouent pendant l’instance arbitrale, les litigants mécontents de la sentence arbitrale ou du jugement annulant la sentence tentent d’engager la responsabilité du centre d’arbitrage dès lors qu’il a surveillé, dirigé et participé au rendu de la sentence.De plus en plus la responsabilité des centres d’arbitrage est mise en cause devant les juridictions étatiques différentes, les fonctions et les pouvoirs exercés par les centres d’arbitrage ainsi que le régime de responsabilité leur est applicable font l’objet d’une attention critique de la part de la doctrine dans plusieurs systèmes juridiques. On s’interroge sur l’origine des rapports qui lient les centres d’arbitrage aux autres acteurs de l’arbitrage, sur les obligations et les pouvoirs conférés aux centres d’arbitrage, et sur les fonctions exercées par les centres d’arbitrage pour établir enfin un régime de responsabilité homogène et pertinent à l’égard des fonctions exercées par les centres d’arbitrage qui a une vocation à s’appliquer dans la majorité des systèmes juridiques
Parties to arbitration seek arbitral institutions to administrate their arbitration in order to have an extra guarantee that ensures the validity of the arbitral award. Given the role that arbitral institutions play during the arbitral procedure, parties unsatisfied either by the arbitral award or the annulment of the award tend to claim the liability of arbitral institution for the awards it had supervised, administered and participated in.The more the allegations of liability raise against the arbitral institutions before courts, the more the issue of arbitral institutions’ functions, powers and liability becomes controversial in different jurisdictions. Therefore, the present study tends to clarify the origin of the relationship existing between arbitral institutions and other parties involved in the arbitration at issue, the duties and powers assigned to the arbitral institutions and the functions performed by the arbitral intuitions, which helps eventually in establishing a kind of liability that complies with the functions performed by the arbitral institutions and can be applied in many jurisdictions
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Arbitral decisions"

1

Henry, Peter, Ross Hamish LLB, and McKenzie Graham, eds. The 33rd America's Cup judicial and arbitral decisions. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Simmons, C. Gordon. Arbitral stare decisis: A study of arbitral restraints upon management rights. Kingston, Ont: Industrial Relations Centre, Queen's University, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Hernández, Dante Figueroa. Impugnabilidad en Chile de las decisiones arbitrales internacionales. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Jurídica la Ley, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Davis, Angela J. Arbitrary justice: The power of the American prosecutor. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Sherk, Murray Wayne. Linear and arbitrary predicates in decision trees for element distinctness. Toronto: University of Toronto, Dept. of Computer Science, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

The dilemma of freedom and foreknowledge. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Michael, Moser, and Bao Chiann. 11 Awards, Decisions, and Orders of the Arbitral Tribunal (Articles 32–40). Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198712251.003.0011.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter discusses section V of the HKIAC Rules. It provides the framework for making awards, decisions, and orders by the arbitral tribunal in HKIAC arbitrations. It also addresses the costs of arbitration and deposits for such costs. The process of rendering an award under the HKIAC Rules involves the following stages: the closure of hearings, deliberation, the reaching of a decision, the assessment of costs, the rendering of the award, and the transmission of the award. The award will typically comprise the following elements: the identification of the parties, the specification of the date of the award and the seat of the arbitration, the procedural history, the summary of the factual background and the issues in dispute, the substantive analysis for the decision, and the specification of any orders to be carried out by the parties.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Gabrielle, Kaufmann-Kohler, and Rigozzi Antonio. 5 The Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199679751.003.0005.

Full text
Abstract:
Building upon the discussion on the validity and effects of arbitration agreements in chapter 3, this chapter examines the rules governing the jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals. It addresses a number of questions arising from the arbitral tribunal’s and the courts’ review of arbitral jurisdiction, from the implications of the principle of competence-competence to jurisdictional objections and the effects of parallel proceedings. Special attention is given to topics such as the so-called negative effect of competence-competence, the arbitration-specific lis pendens rule established in Article 186(1) bis PILA and the res judicata effect of prior arbitral or judicial decisions on jurisdiction. The chapter’s final section discusses anti-suit and anti-arbitration injunctions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Neumayer, Susan. Reconciling the collective agreement with human rights obligations: An analysis of arbitral decisions on seniority rights and the duty to accommodate disabled employees. 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Ian, Gaunt. Part III Where to Arbitrate? Distinctive Features of Maritime Arbitral Seats, 9 Maritime Arbitration in London: Publication of Awards, Appeals, and the Development of English Commercial Law. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198757948.003.0009.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter examines what makes London so popular as a maritime arbitration centre. Chief among the reasons is the availability of a pool of arbitrators with a breadth of professional knowledge and experience, including not just lawyers but commercial men and women. It also discusses the perceived effect of the use of arbitration on the development of English law. On the one hand, the number of appeals going to the courts is such as to ensure that new precedents are produced in order to lend vibrancy to the law. On the other hand, some first instance decisions have shown a tendency on the part of judges to decide cases without sufficient sensitivity to commercial practice, leading to precedents that are hard for arbitrators to apply. The chapter also considers the major challenges faced by the London Maritime Arbitrators Association in maintaining London as the foremost centre for the resolution of shipping disputes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Arbitral decisions"

1

Bungenberg, Marc, and August Reinisch. "Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions." In From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court, 147–65. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01189-5_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Bungenberg, Marc, and August Reinisch. "Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions." In From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court, 155–73. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59732-3_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Bungenberg, Marc, and August Reinisch. "The Pronouncement of Decisions and Its Consequences." In From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court, 141–46. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01189-5_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Bungenberg, Marc, and August Reinisch. "The Pronouncement of Decisions and Its Consequences." In From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court, 149–54. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59732-3_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Hasler, Erika. "The Basketball Arbitral Tribunal—An Overview of Its Process and Decisions." In Yearbook of International Sports Arbitration 2015, 111–52. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-129-6_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Bonnitcha, Jonathan. "The principle of good governance in the reasoning of investor-State arbitral tribunals." In Sustainable Development Principles in the Decisions of International Courts and Tribunals, 583–94. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge,2017. | Series: Routledge research in international environmental law: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315769639-25.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Nau, Robert F., and Kevin F. McCardle. "Arbitrage, Rationality, and Equilibrium." In Decision Making Under Risk and Uncertainty, 189–99. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2838-4_22.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Balbás, A., P. Jiménez Guerra, and M. J. Muñoz Bouzo. "Measuring the Arbitrage Opportunities in an Intertemporal Dynamic Asset Pricing Model." In Applied Decision Analysis, 159–72. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0759-6_13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Wakker, Peter P. "Continuous Subjective Expected Utility for Arbitrary State Spaces." In Theory and Decision Library C, 92–106. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7815-8_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Yu, Jia Yuan, Shie Mannor, and Nahum Shimkin. "Markov Decision Processes with Arbitrary Reward Processes." In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 268–81. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89722-4_21.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Arbitral decisions"

1

Deynekli, Adnan. "Problems in Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Turkey." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c04.00806.

Full text
Abstract:
If the arbitral award which requested to recognition and enforcement given in the country is a party to New York Convention dated 1958, primarily the provisions of this Convention shall be applied. The recognition and enforcement of domestic law and regulations duly implemented. Whether judgment fees should be fixed or proportional are discussion. The demand for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral tribunal shall not review the basis of the decision of the referee. The necessary conditions for enforcement of foreign arbitral decisions and must be moved. The existence of the arbitration agreement against the enforcement of the arbitration requested by referee assignments, and to be aware of the dispute to arbitration and enforcement required to be favorable verdict must not be contrary to public policy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Zhu, Liang, and David Kazmer. "An Extensive Simplex Method Mapping the Global Feasibility." In ASME 2002 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASMEDC, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2002/dac-34115.

Full text
Abstract:
Understanding the global feasibility of engineering decision-making problems is fundamental to the synthesis of rational engineering decisions. An Extensive Simplex Method is presented to solve the global feasibility for a linear decision model relating multiple decision variables to multiple performance measures, and constrained by corresponding limits. The developed algorithm effectively traverses all extreme points in the feasible space and establishes the graph structure reflecting the active constraints and their connectivity. The algorithm demarcates basic and nonbasic variables at each extreme point, which is exploited to traverse the active constraints and merge the degenerate extreme points. Finally, a random model generator is presented with the capability to control the matrix sparseness and the model degeneracy for an arbitrary number of decision variables and performance measures. The results indicate that all these model properties are significant factors affect the total number of extreme points, their connected graph, and the global feasibility.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ezra, Tomer, Michal Feldman, and Ron Kupfer. "On a Competitive Secretary Problem with Deferred Selections." In Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-21}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/25.

Full text
Abstract:
We study the secretary problem in multi-agent environments. In the standard secretary problem, a sequence of arbitrary awards arrive online, in a random order, and a single decision maker makes an immediate and irrevocable decision whether to accept each award upon its arrival. The requirement to make immediate decisions arises in many cases due to an implicit assumption regarding competition. Namely, if the decision maker does not take the offered award immediately, it will be taken by someone else. We introduce a novel multi-agent secretary model, in which the competition is explicit. In our model, multiple agents compete over the arriving awards, but the decisions need not be immediate; instead, agents may select previous awards as long as they are available (i.e., not taken by another agent). If an award is selected by multiple agents, ties are broken either randomly or according to a global ranking. This induces a multi-agent game in which the time of selection is not enforced by the rules of the games, rather it is an important component of the agent's strategy. We study the structure and performance of equilibria in this game. For random tie breaking, we characterize the equilibria of the game, and show that the expected social welfare in equilibrium is nearly optimal, despite competition among the agents. For ranked tie breaking, we give a full characterization of equilibria in the 3-agent game, and show that as the number of agents grows, the winning probability of every agent under non-immediate selections approaches her winning probability under immediate selections.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Jia, Liu, and Zhu Donghua. "The Research of ETF Arbitrage Decision Support System." In 2009 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iciii.2009.105.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Scarponi, Matteo, R. Ajit Shenoi, Stephen R. Turnock, and Paolo Conti. "A Combined Ship Science-Behavioural Science Approach To Create a Winning Yacht-Sailor Combination." In SNAME 18th Chesapeake Sailing Yacht Symposium. SNAME, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.5957/csys-2007-001.

Full text
Abstract:
The challenge of racing one-design yachts is to maximize the performance of the yacht within the scope allowed by the relevant regulations. Such tuning of the yacht, for a well-policed rule, should only make possible small gains. The main area of possible performance gain is in how best an individual sailor or crew can fine tune their racing strategy. The ability to model such strategic decisions requires an understanding of both the physical behaviour of the yacht and how an individual sailor makes such decisions. The present study seeks to predict the performances of a yacht-crew system as a whole by deriving numerical models for human behaviour alongside those referring to the physics of yacht motion. The former aspect, a transposition of athletes' psychology within the racing scene, is investigated by means of questionnaires submitted to skilled athletes and structured interviews with sailing coaches. The latter issue, the mechanical side of the problem, is analysed by solving yacht equations of motions in the time domain; crew inputs in terms of yacht steering and sail trim are considered. The paper presents results from simulations in which the yacht-crew system can sail a racecourse in an arbitrary wind pattern, according to strategic and tactical rules derived by common practice and following the decision making schemata obtained above.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Fiorini, Rodolfo A. "Arbitrary Multiscale Explainable Decision-Making for Symbiotic Autonomous Systems." In 2019 IEEE 18th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing (ICCI*CC). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iccicc46617.2019.9146071.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Scott, Michael J., and Erik K. Antonsson. "Using Indifference Points in Engineering Decisions." In ASME 2000 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2000/dtm-14559.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Multi-criteria decision support methods are common in engineering design. These methods typically rely on the specification of importance weights to accomplish trade-offs among competing objectives. Such methods can have difficulties, however: they may not be able to select all possible Pareto optima, and the direct specification of importance weights can be arbitrary and ad hoc. The inability to reach all Pareto optima is shown to be surmountable by the consideration of trade-off strategy as an additional parameter of a decision. The use of indifference points to select a best solution, as an alternative to direct specification of importance weights, is presented, and a simple truss design example is used to illustrate the concepts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Yang, Junyi, and Jie Ma. "Adaptive arbitrary-order finite time sliding mode differentiator." In 2018 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ccdc.2018.8407210.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Isaka, Kai, Teruyuki Miyajima, and Yoshiki Sugitani. "Time-Domain Equalization Using Neural Network with Arbitrary Decision Delay." In 2020 IEEE 9th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/gcce50665.2020.9291763.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Fradinho, João, António Mourão, António Gabriel-Santos, Miguel Cavique, and António Gonçalves-Coelho. "An Axiomatic Design Interpretation on the Use of Response Surface Methodology to Solve Coupled Designs." In ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2015-51341.

Full text
Abstract:
The most important design decisions are made in the outset of the designing process, when the knowledge about the final design solution is usually scarce and therefore uncertainty is high. According to the independence axiom of Axiomatic Design (AD), design solutions are classified in the following three basic types: uncoupled, decoupled and coupled, the former being the best type and the latter the poorest. As a rule, coupled designs should be avoided, not only because they infringe the independence axiom but also because their information content is hard to compute. Nonetheless, we argue that the occurrence of coupled solutions is noteworthy in general design, although we recognize that they are questionable and that many times they could be easily avoided. Our motivation is to contribute for changing the current state of affairs by showing how to use the minimum information content axiom to make early decisions in the development of coupled designs. One of the general engineering approaches to deal with multiple-FR, multiple-DP designs is the Response Surface Methodology (RSM). We will show in our paper how RSM can be used to deal with coupled designs as if they were uncoupled. The conclusion is that one can graphically compute the information content of coupled designs with two DPs and an arbitrary number of FRs by using multiple RSM. This means that RSM can be interpreted at the light of Axiomatic Design, and embodies an appropriate approach to support decision-making in the case of coupled designs.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography