Academic literature on the topic 'Arbitral decisions'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Arbitral decisions.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Arbitral decisions"
Prytyka, Yu, and D. Prytyka. "NEWLY REFORMED PROCEEDINGS OF THE ARBITRATION AWARDS REVIEW AND INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AWARDS APPEAL IN CIVIL PROCEDURAL LEGISLATION OF UKRAINE." Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal Studies, no. 110 (2019): 29–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2019/3.110-6.
Full textKravtsov, S. "THE APPEAL OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AWARDS AS A FORM OF JUDICAL CONTROL BY NATIONAL COURTS." Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal Studies, no. 110 (2019): 8–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2019/3.110-2.
Full textViñuales, Jorge, and Frank Spoorenberg. "Conflicting Decisions in International Arbitration." Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 8, no. 1 (2009): 91–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157180309x429669.
Full textUzelac, A. "Number of Arbitrators and Decisions of Arbitral Tribunals." Arbitration International 23, no. 4 (December 1, 2007): 573–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/23.4.573.
Full textCalamita, Nicolas Jansen, and Elsa Sardinha. "The Bifurcation of Jurisdictional and Admissibility Objections in Investor-State Arbitration." Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 16, no. 1 (June 21, 2017): 44–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341341.
Full textMetsch, Rutger, and Rémy Gerbay. "Prospect Theory and due process paranoia: what behavioural models say about arbitrators’ assessment of risk and uncertainty." Arbitration International 36, no. 2 (June 1, 2020): 233–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiaa017.
Full textAntonov, Mikhail. "Foreign Court Decisions, Arbitral Awards and Sovereignty in Russia." Review of Central and East European Law 38, no. 3-4 (2013): 317–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15730352-00000006.
Full textMendes Barbosa, Daniel, and Aline Lima Pessoa de Mendonça. "APONTAMENTOS SOBRE A ILEGITMIDADE DAS DECISÕES POR EQUIDADE NA ARBITRAGEM (ITEMS ON THE ILLEGITIMACY OF EQUITY DECISIONS IN ARBITRATION)." Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça 3, no. 1 (June 1, 2017): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/indexlawjournals/2017.v3i1.1948.
Full textCrow, Stephen M., James W. Logan, and Lillian Y. Fok. "Illicit Drug Effects in Labor Arbitration Decision Making." Journal of Drug Issues 24, no. 3 (July 1994): 489–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002204269402400309.
Full textChen, Meng, and Chengzhi Wang. "Vanishing Set-Aside Authority in International Commercial Arbitration." International and Comparative Law Review 18, no. 1 (June 1, 2018): 127–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2018-0029.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Arbitral decisions"
Gómez, Arbeláez Fernando Alfonso. "The binding effect of international arbitral and judicial decisions." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1995. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.627655.
Full textValverde, Gianpierre, and Nadine Márquez. "Review or not review, there is the dilemma: brief reflections on the impugnability of dispute boards’ decisions on the arbitral route." THĒMIS-Revista de Derecho, 2018. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/123849.
Full textEl presente artículo tiene la finalidad de evidenciar las probables contingencias que podrían producirse a causa de la revisión de las decisiones de los Dispute Boards en la vía arbitral. Para llegar a ello, la estructura del artículo se encuentra ordenada de tal manera que facilitará la comprensión de las conclusiones.En ese sentido, primero, se define la naturaleza y la función de los Dispute Boards. Luego, se señala las clases y ventajas que ofrecen estos mecanismos de solución de controversias. Posteriormente, se analiza la disposición legal con la finalidad de desmenuzar su contenido. Se finaliza el artículo con la exposición de los efectos producidos a causa de la revisión de estas decisiones.
Onyeani, Onyema Awa. "The obligation of host states to accord the standard of 'full protection and security' to foreign investments under international investment law." Thesis, Brunel University, 2018. http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/16087.
Full textBernadskaya, Elena. "La sentence arbitrale internationale : contribution de droit processuel comparé (droit français et droit russe)." Thesis, Lyon 3, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011LYO30084.
Full textThe arbitral award is a complex legal notion, sharing characteristics with the contract, the jurisdictional act and the judicial decision. Indeed, the jurisdictional dimension of the arbitral award has now been admitted, though, because of its contractual source, it is still considered as a private legal act. The legal regime of this jurisdictional act is therefore influenced by a contractual bias – as from the arbitrators’ appointment up to the enforcement of the arbitral award. A comparative approach shows that the arbitral award’s notion and legal regime are differently considered in French and Russian laws. The differences lie mainly in the interpretation of the legal qualification criteria, though the latter are similar in the two legal systems. The purpose of this analysis is to identify the said differences through the study of the arbitral award’s notion and legal regime in French and Russian laws, which might lead to consider that the specificity of the arbitral award should be preserved instead of considering the award as a judicial decision
Silva, Olympio José Matos Leite de Carvalho e. "A prescrição no direito internacional privado brasileiro." Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2012. http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=4276.
Full textThis work deals with the operation of limitation periods (prescription) related to actions in personam in the domain of the conflict of laws. It starts with a historical and comparatist analysis of its governing law in international relations before the rule adopted by the Brazilian law is shown: the law of the obligation as the governing law of the limitation rules (lex causae). Although limitation of actions is considered a substantive issue under Brazilian law, it is closely connected with procedural law in many aspects, since its main effect is to render an obligation unenforceable and thus terminate a lawsuit. Therefore, the author presents in detail the issues that are governed by the lex causae and the issues that are governed by the lex fori (also comprising the lex arbitri) related to limitations under Brazilian law, before he deals thoroughly with the operation of the public policy exception to the application of a foreign lex causae in such a matter (also comprising Brazilian imperative rules lois de police). And finally, this work handles the operation of statutes of limitation in proceedings for recognition and enforcement of foreign judicial and arbitral decisions in Brazil.
Cirano, González Marco Andrés. "Facultad del Tribunal de Arbitraje CIADI para postergar su decisión en jurisdicción." Tesis, Universidad de Chile, 2019. http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/170386.
Full textEsta investigación jurisprudencial surge a raíz de ciertas interrogantes planteadas por el denominado “Caso Clarín” (Víctor Pey Casado y Fundación Salvador Allende c. República de Chile). Específicamente, el objeto investigado alude a la decisión de postergar tomada por su Tribunal. Se pretende indagar qué argumentos ha esgrimido la jurisprudencia internacional en arbitraje sobre inversión al momento de posponer la resolución de una objeción jurisdiccional. En concreto, comprobar si es cierto que adjudicar en jurisdicción corresponde al ejercicio de una facultad primeramente preliminar, exponer además qué circunstancias se han invocado para desviarse de dicha regla y excepcionalmente realizar el examen pertinente junto con el fondo de la controversia Desde luego, el lenguaje del Artículo 41(2) del Convenio CIADI parece expresar cierta neutralidad, cuando faculta al Tribunal para determinar si ha de resolver en jurisdicción como “cuestión previa o conjuntamente con el fondo”. Sin embargo, este informe procura demostrar que, según jurisprudencia contemporánea al “Caso Clarín”, por regla general el aspecto jurisdiccional debe ser resuelto preliminarmente. Dicha afirmación tiene como justificación principal la tensión que existe entre posponer y el principio de consensualidad. De acuerdo con este último, las partes en conflicto arbitral pueden ser compelidas a litigar solo en la medida de su consentimiento, y en términos prácticos postergar supone una imposición arbitraria del proceso sobre la parte demandada. Se ha concluido que el carácter ambivalente de algunas defensas preliminares impide resolver en jurisdicción como cuestión previa. Circunstancia que, a su vez, se manifiesta a partir de hechos o argumentos legales sobre hechos con una doble pertinencia normativa. Que de modo simultáneo pueden ser referidos tanto al aspecto jurisdiccional como al fondo controvertido, de forma tal que una decisión al respecto supone una exposición del proceso al riesgo de prejuzgar la controversia
31 mayo de 2020
Madrid, Horna Víctor. "Adopción de decisiones en la Ley de Arbitraje." Derecho & Sociedad, 2017. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/117214.
Full textGonzález, de León Berini Arturo. "La concreción del castigo : el ejercicio legítimo del arbitrio judicial en las decisiones individualizadoras, desde un enfoque fenomenológico." Doctoral thesis, Universitat Abat Oliba, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/454745.
Full textLa presente tesis doctoral tiene como objetivo principal acometer un estudio renovador, interdisciplinar y en profundidad sobre una de las cuestiones hoy más paradójicas en la ciencia del Derecho penal: la llamada individualización judicial de la sanción. Ello es así porque, por un lado, la decisión del órgano sentenciador, que concreta el castigo, tiene una gran importancia para la vida del reo –¿acaso es lo mismo uno que cuatro años de prisión, con todas las secuelas que pueden derivarse? Y, de otra parte, sin embargo, no existe un tratamiento doctrinal o jurisprudencial de la materia que sea acorde con el estatuto procesal y material de dicha función, a la que JESCHECK se refiere como el verdadero “cénit” de la actividad forense. La investigación se divide en tres bloques sucesivos, que no en vano corresponden con la estructura interna de mi trabajo. En primer lugar, tras una visión crítica del panorama actual, planteo la necesidad de un cambio de paradigma “instrumental”, y de este modo sugiero una aproximación conceptual y sistemática propia al tema. Luego centro el análisis en sus vertientes iusfilosófica y “adjetiva” (poco desarrolladas hasta el momento): la concreción del castigo es un proceso decisorio del juez a quo, quien ejerce –aquí especialmente– un amplio margen de arbitrio, y por ende debe estar sometido al control ad quem para revisar su licitud. Por último, frente a los diversos intentos de racionalizar tal labor (de carácter teleológico o dogmático), propongo un método alternativo al respecto: la fenomenología jurídica como una “herramienta” para cuantificar la pena, en busca de criterios intersubjetivos que sean aceptables por la “communis opinio”.
The doctoral dissertation mainly aims at undertaking a renewing, interdisciplinary and indepth study about one of the most paradoxical questions in Criminal Law nowadays: the so-called "sentencing phase of trial". Why so? On the one hand, since this judicial decision specifying a due punishment has a significant importance for the convict’s life: or is it the same serving one or four years in prison –taking into consideration all the attached effects to it? However, on the other hand, there is no academic or case-law treatment of the subject-matter that is in real accordance with the procedural and material status of the above-said task, to which JESCHECK refers as the genuine "peak" of judges’ activity. My research is here divided in three successive parts, now corresponding to the internal structure of the work. First of all, after a critical review of the current scenario, I advocate the need for an “instrumental” turnaround, thus suggesting my own (conceptual and systematic) approach to this issue. I later focus the analysis on its philosophical and “adjective” aspects, which have been little addressed until now: concrete sentencing is a decision- making process of the judge a quo, who exercises –specially at this point– a broad margin of discretion; therefore, it must be controlled by an ad quem court making sure of its legality. Finally, before several attempts to “rationalize” it (teleological or dogmatic), I propose another method: legal phenomenology as a “tool” for quantifying a punishment, in search of intersubjective criteria ready to be passable by the "communis opinio”.
Diese Dissertation zielt vor allem darauf ab, eine erneuerte, interdisziplinäre und eingehende Untersuchung über eine der heute paradoxesten Themen des Strafrechtswissenschaft durchzuführen: die so genannte "Strafzumessung". Warum ist das so? Einerseits, als diese gerichtliche Entscheidung, die eine Strafmaß angibt, eine wichtigsten Bedeutung für das Leben des Täters hat –oder vielleicht ist es das gleiche, dass er nur ein oder vier Jahre im Gefängnis ist, wobei alle damit verbundenen Wirkungen berücksichtigt werden? Auf der anderen Seite gibt es jedoch keine akademische oder rechtsprechende Behandlung des Gegenstands, die in Übereinstimmung mit dem prozessualen und materiellen Status der oben genannten Aufgabe steht, auf die sich JESCHECK als den echten "Höhepunkt" der Spruchtätigkeit des Richters bezieht. Meine Forschung ist hier in drei aufeinanderfolgenden Teilen geteilt, die nun der inneren Struktur des Werkes entsprechen. Zunächst einmal, nach einer kritischen Überprüfung des aktuellen Szenarios, befürworte ich die Notwendigkeit eines "instrumentalen" Paradigma Wandel, und damit meinen eigenen (konzeptuellen und systematischen) Ansatz zu dieser Frage. Ich spüre später die Analyse auf ihre philosophischen und prozessualen Aspekte, die bislang wenig angesprochen wurden: konkrete Verurteilung ist ein Entscheidungsprozess des a quo Richters, der –besonders an dieser Stelle– einen breiten Diskussionsspielraum ausübt. Deshalb muss es von einem ad quem Gericht kontrolliert 7 werden, um sicherzustellen, darüber seine Rechtmäßigkeit. Schließlich schlage ich –vor einigen Versuchen, sie (teleologisch oder dogmatisch) zu "rationalisieren"– eine andere Methode vor: die Phänomenologie des Rechts als "Werkzeug" zur Quantifizierung einer Strafe, auf der Suche nach intersubjektiven Kriterien, die für die "communis opinio" annehmbar sind.
Debourg, Claire. "Les contrariétés de décisions dans l’arbitrage international." Thesis, Paris 10, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011PA100070.
Full textThe phenomenon of conflicting decisions is extremely hazardous. On the one hand, they represent a threat to the coherence of the legal systems. On the other hand, it places a burden on the parties, putting them in an inextricable situation. Being a jurisdictional dispute resolution method, international arbitration does not escape this phenomenon. On the contrary, the specificities of arbitration make it the territory of predilection for the appearance of conflicting decisions. In fact, conflicting decisions result from the conduction of parallel proceedings concerning identical issues, which receive a different analysis. International arbitration aggravates the classical causes resulting in conflicting decisions. These causes are the competition between jurisdictions and the incoherence of the solutions.The risk of the existence of conflicting decisions is frequent and it presents itself is several manners. It can oppose national courts’ decisions assisting and controlling the arbitration, an arbitral award and a national court’s decision or even two arbitral awards.Despite the gravity of the problem and the frequency of the risk of having conflicting decisions, international arbitration seems unarmed to deal with it. Firstly, it is confronted with the limited efficiency of the curative solutions, and secondly, with the difficulties of applying preventive solutions
Elatafy, Sherif. "La responsabilité des centres d'arbitrage." Thesis, Lyon, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016LYSE3013/document.
Full textParties to arbitration seek arbitral institutions to administrate their arbitration in order to have an extra guarantee that ensures the validity of the arbitral award. Given the role that arbitral institutions play during the arbitral procedure, parties unsatisfied either by the arbitral award or the annulment of the award tend to claim the liability of arbitral institution for the awards it had supervised, administered and participated in.The more the allegations of liability raise against the arbitral institutions before courts, the more the issue of arbitral institutions’ functions, powers and liability becomes controversial in different jurisdictions. Therefore, the present study tends to clarify the origin of the relationship existing between arbitral institutions and other parties involved in the arbitration at issue, the duties and powers assigned to the arbitral institutions and the functions performed by the arbitral intuitions, which helps eventually in establishing a kind of liability that complies with the functions performed by the arbitral institutions and can be applied in many jurisdictions
Books on the topic "Arbitral decisions"
Henry, Peter, Ross Hamish LLB, and McKenzie Graham, eds. The 33rd America's Cup judicial and arbitral decisions. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2012.
Find full textSimmons, C. Gordon. Arbitral stare decisis: A study of arbitral restraints upon management rights. Kingston, Ont: Industrial Relations Centre, Queen's University, 1986.
Find full textHernández, Dante Figueroa. Impugnabilidad en Chile de las decisiones arbitrales internacionales. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Jurídica la Ley, 2001.
Find full textDavis, Angela J. Arbitrary justice: The power of the American prosecutor. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Find full textSherk, Murray Wayne. Linear and arbitrary predicates in decision trees for element distinctness. Toronto: University of Toronto, Dept. of Computer Science, 1986.
Find full textMichael, Moser, and Bao Chiann. 11 Awards, Decisions, and Orders of the Arbitral Tribunal (Articles 32–40). Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198712251.003.0011.
Full textGabrielle, Kaufmann-Kohler, and Rigozzi Antonio. 5 The Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199679751.003.0005.
Full textNeumayer, Susan. Reconciling the collective agreement with human rights obligations: An analysis of arbitral decisions on seniority rights and the duty to accommodate disabled employees. 2003.
Find full textIan, Gaunt. Part III Where to Arbitrate? Distinctive Features of Maritime Arbitral Seats, 9 Maritime Arbitration in London: Publication of Awards, Appeals, and the Development of English Commercial Law. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198757948.003.0009.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Arbitral decisions"
Bungenberg, Marc, and August Reinisch. "Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions." In From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court, 147–65. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01189-5_7.
Full textBungenberg, Marc, and August Reinisch. "Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions." In From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court, 155–73. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59732-3_7.
Full textBungenberg, Marc, and August Reinisch. "The Pronouncement of Decisions and Its Consequences." In From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court, 141–46. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01189-5_6.
Full textBungenberg, Marc, and August Reinisch. "The Pronouncement of Decisions and Its Consequences." In From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court, 149–54. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59732-3_6.
Full textHasler, Erika. "The Basketball Arbitral Tribunal—An Overview of Its Process and Decisions." In Yearbook of International Sports Arbitration 2015, 111–52. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-129-6_6.
Full textBonnitcha, Jonathan. "The principle of good governance in the reasoning of investor-State arbitral tribunals." In Sustainable Development Principles in the Decisions of International Courts and Tribunals, 583–94. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge,2017. | Series: Routledge research in international environmental law: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315769639-25.
Full textNau, Robert F., and Kevin F. McCardle. "Arbitrage, Rationality, and Equilibrium." In Decision Making Under Risk and Uncertainty, 189–99. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2838-4_22.
Full textBalbás, A., P. Jiménez Guerra, and M. J. Muñoz Bouzo. "Measuring the Arbitrage Opportunities in an Intertemporal Dynamic Asset Pricing Model." In Applied Decision Analysis, 159–72. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0759-6_13.
Full textWakker, Peter P. "Continuous Subjective Expected Utility for Arbitrary State Spaces." In Theory and Decision Library C, 92–106. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7815-8_6.
Full textYu, Jia Yuan, Shie Mannor, and Nahum Shimkin. "Markov Decision Processes with Arbitrary Reward Processes." In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 268–81. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89722-4_21.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Arbitral decisions"
Deynekli, Adnan. "Problems in Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Turkey." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c04.00806.
Full textZhu, Liang, and David Kazmer. "An Extensive Simplex Method Mapping the Global Feasibility." In ASME 2002 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASMEDC, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2002/dac-34115.
Full textEzra, Tomer, Michal Feldman, and Ron Kupfer. "On a Competitive Secretary Problem with Deferred Selections." In Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-21}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/25.
Full textJia, Liu, and Zhu Donghua. "The Research of ETF Arbitrage Decision Support System." In 2009 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iciii.2009.105.
Full textScarponi, Matteo, R. Ajit Shenoi, Stephen R. Turnock, and Paolo Conti. "A Combined Ship Science-Behavioural Science Approach To Create a Winning Yacht-Sailor Combination." In SNAME 18th Chesapeake Sailing Yacht Symposium. SNAME, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.5957/csys-2007-001.
Full textFiorini, Rodolfo A. "Arbitrary Multiscale Explainable Decision-Making for Symbiotic Autonomous Systems." In 2019 IEEE 18th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing (ICCI*CC). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iccicc46617.2019.9146071.
Full textScott, Michael J., and Erik K. Antonsson. "Using Indifference Points in Engineering Decisions." In ASME 2000 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2000/dtm-14559.
Full textYang, Junyi, and Jie Ma. "Adaptive arbitrary-order finite time sliding mode differentiator." In 2018 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ccdc.2018.8407210.
Full textIsaka, Kai, Teruyuki Miyajima, and Yoshiki Sugitani. "Time-Domain Equalization Using Neural Network with Arbitrary Decision Delay." In 2020 IEEE 9th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/gcce50665.2020.9291763.
Full textFradinho, João, António Mourão, António Gabriel-Santos, Miguel Cavique, and António Gonçalves-Coelho. "An Axiomatic Design Interpretation on the Use of Response Surface Methodology to Solve Coupled Designs." In ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2015-51341.
Full text