Academic literature on the topic 'Architect/Constructor'

There are multiple communicative strategies in architecture depending on the target audience. The mechanisms of representation may radically vary when the recipient is the client, the constructor, the curator, a colleague or even an instructor (1). As an example, the approach may be mainly visual when the target is the client. However, it may be strictly structural to start a conversation with a peer ad mostly conceptual when pointing to the jury members in a competition. In certain cases, the adaptation of the graphic language to the different scenarios leads to such a distortion on the message that the original project is hardly recognizable. To illustrate this point, the article will focus on the project of the Public Seattle Library, designed by the architect Rem Koolhaas. The analysis of five different communicative strategies of the project show peculiar and unequal graphic narrations: from the concept book of the competition, the website of LMN (the American partners of Rem Koolhaas- OMA in this particular project), the website of OMA, the coverage on the Seattle press, the Library Brochure for teenagers and the approach developed on the "Content" book. Rem Koolhaas coined the concept of "design of information" to express the fundamental relationship between the message and media in architecture. In his practice, the communicative strategy is present from the beginning of the design process till the final stages. In this article, the thoughtful comparison of these examples will enable to extract conclusions on the use of communication in architectural design and reflect on the iconic and communicative dimension of architecture in general.

La figura de Rem Koolhaas ha sido altamente estudiada y documentada, así como su producción arquitectónica y su constructo teórico. En opinión de muchos autores, puede tratarse del arquitecto vivo más influyente en la actualidad. Este artículo pretende reflexionar sobre la verdadera esencia de su aportación a la historia de la arquitectura y poner de relieve la trascendental importancia que tiene en su caso lo “no construido”. De hecho, en muchas ocasiones han sido sus propuestas teóricas, los concursos no premiados (y por tanto no materializados) o sus publicaciones, las que han resultado determinantes e influyentes sobre el “status quo” arquitectónico actual. Koolhaas es un personaje poliédrico, su imagen en el espejo nos devuelve múltiples reflejos: el Rem mediático, el intelectual, el conceptualizador, el constructor, el analista, el periodista, el director de cine, el estratega, el icono...En este caso, nos centraremos en su faceta más trascendente desde nuestra perspectiva: el Rem COMUNICADOR. Uno de sus hallazgos más interesantes fue la necesidad de crear un “alter ego” de OMA, que le permitiera realizar investigaciones y experimentaciones puramente especulativas, cuyo objetivo no estuviera determinado a priori o se centrara en la necesaria materialización del proyecto. Es a través de AMO donde Koolhaas ha podido visibilizar su verdadero yo. The figure of Rem Koolhaas has been highly studied and documented, as well as its architectural production and its theoretical construct. In the opinion of many authors, he might be the most influential living architect at present. This article aims to reflect on the true essence of his contribution to the history of architecture and to highlight the crucial importance that in his case has the “un-built”. In fact, on many occasions his theoretical proposals, his un-winning competitions (and therefore un-built)and his publications, have proved to be decisive and influential on the existing architectural “status quo”. Koolhaas is a multi-faceted character, whose image in the mirror returns multiple reflections: The celebrity-Rem, the intellectual, the “conceptualizer”, the constructor, the analyst, the journalist, the film director, the strategist, the icon...In this case, we will focus on your most important facet from our perspective: The communicator-Rem. One of his most interesting findings was the need to create a “alter ego” of OAM, which would enable him to carry out purely speculative research and experiments, whose objective was not determined a priori or focused on the necessary materialization of the project. It is through AMO how Koolhaas has been able to make visible his true self.

The State Tretyakov Gallery hosts a significant exhibition “Laboratory of the Future. Kinetic Art in Russia”. Its significance, the influence of the artistic phenomenon of kinetic art itself on domestic art of the 20th and 21st centuries has not yet been fully determined. The exhibition emphasizes kinetic art as one of the central national trends in experimental artistic creativity of the 20th century, even as some kind of a tradition. On the one hand, the exhibition would have been impossible without the participation of the creators of the Russian avant-garde, the founders of abstract art, the creators of the first abstract sculptures and dynamic structures: V. V. Kandinsky, K.S. Malevich, El Lissitzky, V. E. Tatlin, A. M. .Rodchenko. On the other hand, recognized masters, inventors of kinetic art in the USSR in the 1960s and 1970s, creators of the synthetic works of art combining the sound, color, form, images and motion are also important: Lev Nusberg’s “Group Movement” in Moscow and “KB Prometheus” under the leadership of Bulat Galeev in Kazan, the first kinetic construction at the USSR Exhibition of Economic Achievements Francisco Infante and the dynamic installation “Atom” by Vyacheslav Koleichuk, experiments with electronic sound and acoustics of the Experimental Studio of Electronic Music of Evgeny Murzin, the Theremen Center, created by Andrei Smirnov, space projects by Vyacheslav Loktev installations with light and sound in Leningrad by August Lanin 1. One of the key figures in this artistic process was the architect, designer, researcher, inventor, constructor and teacher Vyacheslav Fomich Koleichuk (1941–2018). This imaginary dialogue is covering some of the inventions of the artist, developing the traditions of Russian kinetic art, expanding the artistic space of modern design and architecture 2.

ABSTRACTMultiple communicative strategies can be followed in architecture according to the target audience. The mechanisms of representation may radically vary when the recipient is the client, the constructor, the curator, a colleague or even an instructor (1). As an example, the approach may be mainly visual when the target is the client. However, it may be strictly conceptual when pointing to the jury members in a competition. In certain cases, the adaptation of the graphic language to the different scenarios leads to such a distortion on the message that the original project is hardly recognizable. This article will focus on the project of the Public Seattle Library, designed by the architect Rem Koolhaas. The analysis of five different communicative strategies of the project show peculiar and unequal graphic narrations: from the concept book of the competition, the website of LMN (the American partners of Rem Koolhaas- OMA in this particular project), the website of OMA, the coverage on the Seattle press, the Library Brochure for teenagers and the approach developed on the "Content" book. Rem Koolhaas coined the concept of "design of information" to express the fundamental relationship between the message and media in architecture. In his practice, the communicative strategy is present from the beginning of the design process till the final stages. In this article, the thoughtful comparison of these examples will enable to extract conclusions on the use of communication in architectural design and reflect on the iconic and communicative dimension of architecture in general.RESUMENEn arquitectura, se pueden seguir múltiples estrategias comunicativas en función de la audiencia a la que estén dirigidas. Los mecanismos de representación varían radicalmente cuando el receptor es un cliente, el constructor, un comisario expositivo, un colega arquitecto o un profesor. Como ejemplo, se adoptaría una aproximación fundamentalmente visual en el caso de dirigirnos a un cliente, mientras que para una comunicación en un concurso, se optaría por una aproximación netamente conceptual. En determinados casos, la adaptación del lenguaje gráfico a los distintos escenarios genera tal distorsión en el mensaje que el proyecto original resulta prácticamente irreconocible. El artículo se centra en el proyecto de la Biblioteca Pública de Seattle, diseñado por Rem Koolhaas. El análisis de cinco estrategias comunicativas distintas nos muestra narraciones gráficas casi antagónicas. Desde la propuesta del concurso, la web de LMN (los socios americanos de OMA), pasando por la propia web de OMA, la cobertura en prensa o el folleto informativo de la propia biblioteca, Rem Koolhaas muestra la especial relación entre el mensaje y el medio en arquitectura, acuñando el término “diseño de la información”. En su trabajo, la estrategia comunicativa se encuentra presente desde el inicio del proceso de diseño y hasta los estadios finales. Mediante la comparación analítica de los distintos ejemplos se podrán extraer conclusiones del uso de la comunicación en el diseño arquitectónico y su reflejo en la dimensión icónica de la arquitectura.

The name Chubutolithes was proposed by Ihering (1922) for an unknown type of fossil occurring in Eocene continental rocks of Patagonia, Argentina. Bown and Ratcliffe (1988) demonstrated that Chubutolithes is a trace fossil; specifically, it is the fossil nest of a mud-dauber. The latter authors also suggested that Chubutolithes was constructed by an insect belonging to the hymenopteran family Sphecidae, and coined the specific name C. gaimanensis for the unusual trace fossil. Comparison with a Recent nest of the mud-dauber Auplopus (Pompilidae; Figure 1.1) suggests that Auplopus is a much more likely candidate as the architect of Chubutolithes than are any sphecid mud-daubers.

Teesid: Oktoobrirevolutsiooni järgne vene emigratsioon, mida teaduskirjanduses traditsiooniliselt nimeta takse esimeseks laineks, valgus mööda ilma laiali ning oli seninägematult arvukas, haarates kaasa miljoneid endise Tsaari-Venemaa elanikke. Sellele nähtusele on pühendatud tuhandeid humanitaartea duslikke, sotsioloogilisi, politoloogilisi jm uurimusi, mis kajastavad vene eksiilkultuuri eri tahke. Vene emigratsioon puudutas ka Eestit ning enamik käsitletud ilmingutest olid otseselt seotud siinse vene kogukonnaga, ent kohati väga erineva tähendusega. Käesoleva artikli eesmärk on lühidalt kirjeldada vene emigratsiooni sotsiaalset ja demograafilist struktuuri, selle keskusi, emigrantide rolli oma ja võõra kultuuri säilitamisel, põlvkondadevahelist aspekti, eelkõige kirjanduselus, ning haridusküsimusi. Lähemalt on käsitletud vene emigrantide rolli Eesti kultuuris muu maailma taustal. SU M M A R Y After the October Revolution a mass of emigrants, all citizens of the former Tsarist Russia dispersed in the world. In the scholarly literature this dispersal of upwards of a million people has come to be referred to as the first wave of Russian emigration. Thousands of scholarly articles from the humanities, sociology, political science and other disciplines have been devoted to various aspects of Russian exile culture: descriptions of exile cultural centres (including Paris, Berlin, Constantinople, Brazil, and the USA); various cultural phenomena (literature, film, theatre, fashion, journalism, art, etc.). As was true of the large part of Europe, the Russian emigration impacted Estonia, as it did across the rest of Europe; however, the fate of the Russian community in Estonia had strikingly original features. Some of these derived principally from Estonia’s position as a border state, as well as from the fact that even in the days of the Russian Empire, over 40000 Russians resided in Estonia. Theoretically, this should have made it easier for Russian emigrants to assimilate to Estonian conditions (for example, Russian schools existed from an earlier period, along with the requisite complement of teachers; Russian-language journalism existed, etc.). However, in reality, most of the promoters of local Russian culture emerged from among the emigrants, new settlers in Estonia.The purpose of this article is briefly to describe the social and demographic structure of the Russian emigration (military personnel will be treated separately) and the question of their legalization, which was solved in 1921 by the renowned Norwegian explorer Fridtjof Nansen. At his initiative, the Intergovernmental Conference of the representatives of 34 nations that met in Geneva adopted the designation refugee, which for the time being only referred to stateless people of Russian origin. The legitimation of these people as refugees was contingent on the acceptance of a statute confirming the use of a heretofore nonexistent International identity document, the so-called Nansen Certificate. This certificate enabled Russian emigrants to claim refugee status in several nations, which included the attribution of rights and freedoms equal to those of citizens of these nations. Approximately 450 000 Nansen Certificates were issued over a period of several years.The article contains brief descriptions of centres of exile, the circumstances and chronology of their foundation, the perceived role of emigrants in the preservation of their own culture and a culture foreign to them. The intergenerational conflict that occurred in cultural, in particular literary life is discussed. Among other topics considered are issues concerning publication, journalistic activity, and educational activities; a brief consideration is given to the positions of different nations on the support and preservation of Russian-language education. A very important influence on Russian emigration was Vladimir Lenin’s so-called „gift“— the expulsion of over 200 scholars from Soviet Russia in the year 1921.A special place is accorded in this article to the role of Russian emigrants in Estonian culture, including the role played by Russian cultural figures (scholars, military personnel, artists, etc.) in building up the young Estonian Republic. The most active participation of Russians was occasioned by the creation of Estonia’s own legal system. In addition, Russians participated in organizing the Estonian postal system and local transportation. The role of Russian emigrants in the development of the educational system of the Estonian Republic is also significant. The article describes the leadership provided by the local Russian community, particularly in the establishment in 1924 of the tradition of Russian cultural festivals, which was then disseminated globally in Russian exile culture.Brief consideration is given to local Russian culture and its importance in the development of Estonian culture. The most important facet of this was the Estonian ballet, born of Russian traditions and experience. Reportedly the first professional ballet troupe was assembled in Tallinn in 1918 by Sessy Smironina-Sevun, but the first actual ballet was performed in 1922, premiering with Coppelia, choreographed by the Moscow Bolshoi Ballet prima ballerina Viktorina Krieger, who played the lead role, and was later to be the artistic director of the Estonia ballet. In 1919, Jevgenia Litvinova, a former ballerina from the Maria Theatre, founded the first ballet studio in Tallinn.Another topic addressed in the article is local publishing and literary activity in the Russian language. Besides Russian publishing houses (Bibliofiil, Koltso, Alfa, Russkaja Kniga), Estonian-language publishing houses printed Russian-language books, textbooks, magazines and newspapers. Up to the year 1940, 91 publishing houses in Estonia printed Russian-language material, many of them only a few Russian books. In addition to publication activities, literary circles were active at different times. Among them was the Revel Literary Circle, founded in 1898, the oldest and most unusual gathering place for educated people. Poets’ workshops in Tallinn and Tartu were among the more interesting societies in Estonia, aimed more specifically at poets of the younger generation. Members of the Tallinn workshop created their own almanac, „Nov“, and published a magazine, Polevõje Tsvetõ.All of these phenomena and problems must be situated in the context of the larger world. The Russian emigration is far from being merely a unique phenomenon of life and work outside of the homeland; indeed, it exerted a strong influence on the culture, scholarship, and literature of the countries of settlement. Among the greatest achievements of 20th century humanity are the works of Nobel laureate and writer Ivan Bunin, prose writer Vladimir Nabokov, artists Marc Chagall, Konstantin Korovin, Aleksander Benois, and Vassily Kandinsky; the theories of Noble laureate, physicist and chemist Ilya Prigogine; the works of composers Sergei Rachmaninoff, and Igor Stravinsky; actor and theatre director Mikhail Chekhov; constructor Igor Sikorsky; chemist Vladimir Ipatjev. No less important in Estonian culture were poet Igor Severjanin, architect Aleksander Vladovski, representatives of Russian classical ballet (Tamara Beck, Jevgenia Litvinova); artists Anatoli Kaigorodov, Nikolai Kalmakov, and Andrei Jegorov.

This dissertation is a historical study of the life and work of French-Canadian architect and engineer, Ernest Cormier (1885-1980), who is considered to be among the most important Canadian architects of his generation, yet about whom relatively few scholarly studies exist. In light of the range of issues raised by Cormier’s work and their degree of importance to an understanding of Canadian culture at large during the first half of the twentieth century, this dissertation argues that no other architect operating in Canada during the interwar period made a contribution that touched on so many salient issues as Cormier did. A cosmopolitan figure who tapped into everything available to him, Cormier’s multidisciplinary practice spanned over five decades in his native city of Montréal, and reflects his synthesis of diverse influences, his role as an agent of cultural transfer, and his remarkable degree of savoir-faire in everything he undertook. Entrusted with important commissions at local, national and international levels, Cormier’s contribution merits further study both as a milestone in the development of architecture in Canada, and for what it reveals about the charged sociocultural dynamics of Montréal at that time, which was then the cultural and economic capital of the country. Cormier was particularly active during the interwar period, which was an important time in the advent of cultural modernity in the province of Québec, and in the development of a national consciousness among French Canadians. Focused primarily on the close study of two very different yet interrelated projects by Cormier that date from this period, this dissertation contends that the house he designed for himself (1930-31) and the main pavilion of the Université de Montréal (1924-43) are his most important works, both for what they reveal about his sustained commitments as well as for the innovative ways in which they address the conditions of modernity, and thus, critically illuminate the opportunities and constraints of their time and place. Heavily reliant on the study of archival materials alongside empirical analyses of the buildings, and readings from a range of interdisciplinary sources in order to take account of the work’s meaning and significance within and beyond architecture culture, a central leitmotif of this study is the theme of ‘construction’ construed both as a preoccupation internal to Cormier’s oeuvre and as a theoretical orientation driving my analysis of his work. In the first instance, the figure of the constructeur [constructor] is incorporated into Cormier’s professional title to better align himself with French architecture and engineering culture, particularly with the work of Auguste Perret, whom he greatly admired. As well, for Cormier, construction in the sense of building things, is inseparable from design, and finds sustained expression in his deep curiosity for how things are made, his investment in making at all scales across diverse métiers and media, and his exacting standards for all of his work to be well executed. Finally, keenly attendant to architecture’s communicative function, this dissertation examines the profound representational role played by the Cormier residence and the Université de Montréal in the construction of identity at the respective scales of the individual and that of a collective.
Architecture, Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning

Die „Virtuelle Bibliothek Matthäus Daniel Pöppelmann“ ist als Bücherverzeichnis mit beigefügten Weblinks zu digitalisierten historischen Druckwerken konzipiert und spiegelt die einstige, im Original verlorene Privatbibliothek des bekannten Dresdner Barockbaumeisters wieder. Die Erarbeitung erfolgte 2013/14 im Teilprojekt-Team der TU Dresden innerhalb des European Network of Baroque Cultural Heritage (ENBaCH). 2017 ist die Virtuelle Bibliothek im Rahmen des an der TU Dresden angesiedelten Fritz-Thyssen-Forschungsprojekts Matthäus Daniel Pöppelmann (1662-1736): Die Schloss- und Zwingerplanungen für Dresden. Planen und Bauen im „modus Romanus“ hinsichtlich der transkribierten Buchtitel und der weiterführenden Verlinkungen aktualisiert worden.

The „Virtual Library Matthäus Daniel Pöppelmann“ is planned as a book index with attached weblinks to digitized historical printed works and reflects the former, in original lost private library of the famous baroque architect in Dresden. The index was developed in 2013/14 by the subproject-team of the TU Dresden within the European Network of Baroque Cultural Heritage (ENBaCH). In 2017 the virtual library has been brought up-to-date with regard to the transcribed book titles and the additional weblinks within the context of the Project Matthäus Daniel Pöppelmann (1662-1736): Die Schloss- und Zwingerplanungen für Dresden. Planen und Bauen im “modus romanus” of the TU Dresden, supported by the Fritz-Thyssen-Stiftung.