Relevant bibliographies by topics / Argumentation method

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers
  6. Reports

Academic literature on the topic 'Argumentation method'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 5 June 2025
Last updated: 15 July 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Argumentation method.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Argumentation method"

1

Nariţa, Ionel. "Argumentation Moods." Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Communicatio 7, no. 1 (2020): 107–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/auscom-2020-0008.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Argumentation is an act of communication performed by a speaker aiming to persuade a listener to accept or reject a proposition, named thesis, using another proposition, called argument, and a relation between them – the frame of argumentation. Argumentations are evaluated relatively to the pragmatic value of success and to the logical value of correctness. These values are independent of each other – namely, from the success of an argumentation, nothing can be inferred about its correctitude, and reciprocally. In order to establish the correctness of an argumentation, we can classify all argumentations into moods such as the syllogisms. A necessary condition for the correctitude of an argumentation is the validity of its mood. The validity of the argumentative moods is investigated using the reduction method established by Aristotle for syllogistic moods.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Hassan, Raad Ahmed, and Lubna Hussein Salman. "The Argumentative Elements Of Discours In The Plague For Albert Camus Les éléments argumentatifs dans le discours de La Peste d’Albert Camus." Journal of the College of languages, no. 45 (January 2, 2022): 150–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.36586/jcl.2.2022.0.45.0150.

Full text
Abstract:
Argumentation is not a contemporary, yet a deep rooted intellectual phenomenon dates back to Romans and Greeks times. The argumentative elements ,the author is trying to convey to the reader, are linguistic procedures aim at persuading and being persuaded of what is true. The present study traces, through Camus’ novel The plague, the best method to construct argumentative techniques used to express the author’s deep philosophies. Résumé L’argumentation n’est pas un phénomène intellectuel nouveau, ses origines reviennent aux savants grecs et romains. Elle est une activité langagière ayant pour objectif de justifier un raisonnement en vue de persuader et convaincre l’autre. Cette argumentation est au centre des discours. Camus essaye juste de transmettre d’une manière argumentative un message au lecteur. C’est cette constatation qui sera l’objet de ce présent travail dans lequel nous allons savoir comment se construit le discours philosophique et argumentatif à travers le roman intitulé La Peste. Ensuite nous allons analyser les éléments argumentatifs que Camus met en scène pour transmettre sa philosophie à son lecteur.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Antonova, Irina B. "“IT SEEMS TO ME I KNOW THE TRUTH BUT I HAVE NO WORDS TO EXPRESS IT”: ARGUMENTATION, ITS PECULIARITIES AND POTENTIALS." RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Psychology. Pedagogics. Education, no. 3 (2022): 54–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2022-3-54-65.

Full text
Abstract:
The problem of argumentation caused by the ambiguity and multi-functionality of the phenomenon itself is ranked to be an infinite one. In ancient times argumentation used to be rightly considered a component of cognition and a method to prove the truth. Its functions today have extended considerably – from systematizing the knowledge to influencing rhetorically human views and behavior. It fulfills even more ambitious targets affecting the essence of ethical standards and thus the social and political background of the society. Teaching argumentation is a constituent of the modern educational system in Russia. In accordance with the requirements registered in the State Educational Standard for higher professional training of the Russian Federation (2010), experts in the humanitarian non-linguistic fields must demonstrate the ability to critical thinking which, in its turn, presupposes thinking and speaking logically in both – native and foreign – languages, holding, formulating logically one’s thoughts in the native and foreign languages, holding argumentative discussions, accepting or counter arguing a debatable issue. The author considers the phenomenon of argumentation applying the activity approach and thus analyzing its aims, correlating argumentation and proof concepts, and estimating teacher (argumentator) – student (recipient) relationships. In addition to this, the paper is aimed at considering the factors of transforming educational process from an informative to an argumentative (persuasive) one in which argumentation might be regarded as a method of impact
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Nasihah, Durotun, and Sonny Elfiyanto. "ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING CONSTRUCTION OF EFL WRITING CLASS THROUGH DECLARATIVE SPEECH ACTS APPROACH." IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education) 9, no. 2 (2022): 192–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v9i2.28522.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACTThis study investigates how Indonesian undergraduate EFL students construct argumentative essays through critical discussion using Declarative speech acts and pragmatic approaches. This study employed a qualitative research method. The data consist of argumentative essays authored by undergraduate students majoring in English at a private university in Indonesia (N=34). Students worked in pairs to discuss a controversial topic, separated into protagonist and antagonist groups. The analysis showed that students used four steps of argumentation: confrontation, opening, argumentation, and conclusion. Most students used confrontation and opening stages in the introduction, argumentation stage in developing a paragraph, and end with a conclusion. To understand the purpose of argumentation, the students used four types of speech acts, which have different functions: assertive, commissive, declarative, and directive speeches. Implementing the declarative speech acts theory helps the students comprehend argumentative writing and trains them to have good critical thinking in resolving different opinions. ABSTRAKPenelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana siswa EFL Indonesia menuliskan esai argumentatif melalui diskusi kritis dengan menggunakan pendekatan pragma-dialektika Van Eemeren dan Grootendorst (1970) dan pragmatis Searle (1969). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif. Data berasal dari esai argumentatif semester ketiga yang ditulis oleh mahasiswa Indonesia di jurusan bahasa Inggris. Tiga puluh empat siswa di kelas menulis mendiskusikan topik yang berbeda. Siswa bekerja berpasangan untuk mendiskusikan topik kontroversial, dipisahkan menjadi kelompok protagonis dan antagonis. Analisis mengklaim bahwa siswa menggunakan empat langkah argumentasi: konfrontasi, pembukaan, argumentasi, dan kesimpulan. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa sebagian besar siswa menggunakan tahap konfrontasi dan pembukaan dalam pendahuluan, tahap argumentasi dalam mengembangkan paragraf, dan diakhiri dengan kesimpulan. Untuk mengetahui tujuan penggunaan argumentasi, siswa menggunakan empat tindak tutur, yang memiliki fungsi berbeda: asertif, komisif, deklaratif, dan direktif. Menerapkan teori pragma-dialektika membantu siswa memahami tulisan argumentatif dan melatih mereka untuk memiliki pemikiran kritis yang baik dalam menyelesaikan pendapat yang berbeda.How to Cite: Nasihah, D., Elfiyanto, S. (2022). Argumentative Writing Construction of EFL Writing Class Through Declarative Speech Acts Approach. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 9(2), 192-210. doi:10.15408/ijee.v9i2.28522
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Macagno, Fabrizio. "Argumentation Profiles." Informal Logic 42, no. 1 (2022): 83–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v42i1.7215.

Full text
Abstract:
An argumentation profile is defined as a methodological instrument for analyzing argumentative discourse considering distinct and interrelated dimensions: the types of argument used, their quality, and the emotions triggered. Walton’s theoretical contributions are developed as a coherent analytical and multifaceted toolbox for capturing these aspects. Argumentation schemes are used to detect and quantify the types of argument. Fallacy analysis and the assessment of the implicit premises retrieved through the schemes allow evaluating arguments. Finally, the frequency of emotive words signals the most common emotions aroused. This method is illustrated through a corpus of argumentative tweets of three politicians.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Nishina, Kei, and Katsumi Nitta. "Summarization Method of Argumentation Based on Argumentation Framework." Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 39, no. 1 (2024): C—N12_1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1527/tjsai.39-1_c-n12.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Gobbo, Federico, Marco Benini, and Jean H. M. Wagemans. "More than Relata Refero: Representing the Various Roles of Reported Speech in Argumentative Discourse." Languages 7, no. 1 (2022): 59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/languages7010059.

Full text
Abstract:
Reported speech, or relata refero, although not always part of the argumentation tout court, can be an important element of argumentative discourse. It might, for instance, provide information on the position of another party in the discussion or function as part of the premise of an argument from authority. Whereas existing methods of representing argumentative discourse focus on arguments and their interrelations, this paper develops a method that enables the analyst to also include informative elements in the representation, focusing on reported speech. It does so by incorporating the notion of ‘voice’ into the representation framework of Adpositional Argumentation (AdArg). In particular, the paper explains how to formalize the constituents of this notion and illustrates its use in representing (1) an author’s report of the position of another party (including the supporting argumentation); (2) an author’s own position (including the supporting argumentation); and (3) source-based arguments such as the argument from authority, with an indication of the distance of the source from the author.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Fitri, Nurul Rahmiah, Muhammad Rusdi, and Muhammad Haris Effendi-Hasibuan. "The effect of argumentation-oriented learning models, inquiry-based learning models and science process skills on students' argumentation ability in chemistry." Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia 14, no. 3 (2022): 180–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v14i3.39788.

Full text
Abstract:
One of the models whose learning syntax matches the science process skill component and students' argumentation ability is the inquiry model. Inquiry models have been widely applied, such as Guided Inquiry Based Learning (GIBL), and modified, such as the Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) and Argumentative Inquiry Blended Learning (AIBL) learning models, where the ADI and AIBL learning models in the learning syntax have been integrated with argumentation activities. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of learning models and students' science process skills on students' argumentation ability. The research design used a 3 x 2 factorial design with a mixed method. The results showed that: (1) there was an effect of argumentation-oriented learning on the inquiry learning models on students' argumentation ability; (2) there is an effect of science process skill level on students' argumentation ability; and (3) there is no interaction between argumentation-oriented learning on the inquiry learning models and the level of science process skill on students' argumentation ability.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

FENG, YUNFEI. "Argumentative geometry of the Chinese eight-part essay." Филология: научные исследования, no. 4 (April 2024): 142–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.7256/2454-0749.2024.4.70438.

Full text
Abstract:
The subject of the study is the linguistic and cultural features of the Chinese argumentation tradition. The object of the study is the elements of the logical structure of reasoning. The author examines such aspects of the topic as the differences between Eastern and Western models of argumentation and the prerequisites for the formation of the Chinese style of argumentation. Definitions of argumentation and related terms included in the range of concepts of argumentative discourse are given. In the aspect of this problem, the question of the relationship between the functional and semantic type of reasoning and argumentation is also highlighted. The author believes that argumentation is a more detailed development of reasoning based on ways of presenting facts, quotations, appealing to authority, emotions, expert opinion, and laws. In the social contexts of polemics, public discussions, Essenes, and science, the ability to argue is understood as an art. The author also notes that argumentation is a mental and predominantly verbal activity. Special attention is paid to the structure of classical Chinese literary argumentation. For analysis, the author turns to the scientific metaphor "geometry of argumentation". This facet of argumentation is a methodology for reconstructing argumentative discourse. According to this, a reconstruction method based on the identification of argumentation schemes is used. Argumentation schemes are generalized models of how an argument relates to a conclusion or thesis. The main conclusion of the work is that the structure of argumentation in the Chinese text differs from that in the generally accepted model of argumentation of the Western type. To substantiate this conclusion, the author considers S. Tulmin's model, which consists of six elements, believing that the elements of the model can be distinguished in the representative texts of the argumentation. Therefore, the essay can be considered as an explication of argumentation schemes. After that, the author proceeds to analyze the structure of the argumentation in the text of the "Essay on Eight Legs" (八股文), which consists of eight elements. The intermediate conclusion of the work is information about the positive and negative prescriptive aspects of using the eight-part essay scheme in an educational and professional context and in the context of application in less institutional discourses.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Macagno, Fabrizio. "Esquemas de argumentação para a interpretação da lei." Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea 3, no. 2 (2019): 73–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.21875/tjc.v3i2.22710.

Full text
Abstract:
RESUMO:Neste artigo demonstra-se como os esquemas argumentativos (esquemas que representam argumentos refutáveis, combinados com perguntas críticas correspondentes), podem ser usados para representar a estrutura lógica dos vários tipos de argumentos reconhecidos como fundamentais na interpretação da lei por Tarello (1980). Defende-se que o processo de interpretação da lei tem uma estrutura argumentativa distinta na qual a conclusão, nomeadamente o significado disputável ou questionado atribuído a uma fonte jurídica, é uma afirmação que necessita ser respaldada por argumentos refutáveis a favor ou contra. Esta transformação de argumentos de interpretação numa estrutura de esquemas argumentativos é analisada em detalhe em dois argumentos, o argumento psicológico e o argumento a contrario. A natureza refutável de cada esquema é demonstrada por meio de questões críticas que identificam as condições padrão para a aceitação de argumentos interpretativos e fornecem um método para avaliar a força ou a fraqueza de um determinado argumento. ABSTRACT:In this paper, the logical structures of the interpretative arguments summarizing the various interpretative canons considered fundamental by Tarello (1980) are represented by argumentation schemes, namely patterns of defeasible arguments combined with their corresponding critical questions. The process of statutory interpretation is shown to have a specific argumentative structure where the conclusion corresponds to the disputed or questionable meaning attributed to a legal source and needs to be supported and attacked through defeasible arguments. This translation of interpretative arguments into argumentation schemes is illustrated in detail considering two specific arguments, the psychological and the a contrario arguments. The defeasibility conditions of each scheme are summarized in a set of critical questions, which identify the default conditions for accepting interpretative arguments and provide a method for evaluating a given argument as weak or strong.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Argumentation method"

1

Gómez, Rodríguez Laura. "A Tool-Supported Method for Fallacies Detection in Process-Based Argumentation." Thesis, Mälardalens högskola, Akademin för innovation, design och teknik, 2018. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-40940.

Full text
Abstract:
Process-based arguments aim at demonstrating that a process, compliant with a standard, has been followed during the development of a safety-critical system. Compliance with these processes is mandatory for certification purposes, so the generation of process-based arguments is essential, but also a very costly and time-consuming task. In addition, inappropriate reasoning in the argumentation such as insufficient evidence (i.e. a fallacious argumentation), may result in a loss of quality of the system, leading to safety-related failures. Therefore, avoiding or detecting fallacies in process-based arguments is crucial. However, the process of reviewing such arguments is currently done manually and is based on the expert’s knowledge, so it is a very laborious and error-prone task.In this thesis, an approach to automatically generate fallacy-free process-based arguments is proposed and implemented. This solution is composed of two parts; (i) detecting omission of key evidence fallacies on the modelled processes, and (ii) transforming them into process-based safety arguments. The former checks automatically if the process model, compliant with the Software & Systems Process Engineering Metamodel (SPEM) 2.0, contains the sufficient information for not committing an omission of key evidence fallacy. If fallacies are detected, the functionality provides the proper recommendation to resolve them. Once the safety engineers/process engineers modify the process model following the provided recommendations, the second part of the solution can be applied. This one generates automatically the process-based argument, compliant with the Structured Assurance Case Metamodel (SACM), and displays it –rendered via Goal Structuring Notation (GSN)– into the OpenCert assurance case editor within the AMASS platform. The applicability of the solution is validated in the context of the ECSS-E-ST-40C standard.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Eleuterio, Marco Antonio. "AMANDA : a computational method for mediating asynchronous group discussions." Compiègne, 2002. http://www.theses.fr/2002COMP1400.

Full text
Abstract:
Cette thèse traite de la communication assistée par ordinateur. Nous proposons AMANDA, une méthode algorithmique pour la médiation de discussions de groupe à distance destinée à l'articulation d'une discussion collective sans effort humain de coordination. La méthode consiste à lancer un ensemble de questions parmi un groupe de participants et ensuite à relancer leurs réponses et arguments en des cycles de discussions successifs. Tout au long de la discussion, des mécanismes intelligents identifient les interactions potentielles entre les participants du débat et proposent des nouvelles interactions entre eux. La discussion est structurée sous la forme d'un arbre de discussions, sur lequel la méthode réalise ses inférences. Nous proposons aussi la modélisation de la connaissance du domaine - à l'aide d'ontologies et de modèles de tâches - et une méthode de génération de questions en langage naturel à partir des modèles de domaine. La méthode Amanda a été implémentée et expérimentée dans des situations réelles de formation à distance<br>This thesis is about computer-mediated communication. It describes AMANDA, a computational method for mediating asynchronous group discussions among distant leamers. The proposed method is intended to coordinate collective discussions and improve group communication with negligible or no human effort. The method consists of launching a set of issues for collective debate and involving the participants in successive discussion cycles. At each cycle, the answers and arguments provided by the participants are intentionally redistributed among the group. Throughout the discussion, specifie mechanisms' search for potential interactions that might improve the debate and propose new interactions among the group. Ln addition to the intelligent mediation of group discussions, AMANDA supports knowledge representation (domain ontologies and task structures) and generates natural language questions to be used as issues for the debate. This work also describes the software prototype that implements the method and the experimental results frOID applying AMANDA in actual training situations
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Titterington, Lynda Carol. "Case studies in pathophysiology: a study of an online interactive learning environment to develop higher order thinking and argumentation." The Ohio State University, 2007. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1196183110.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Gorzoni, Paula Fernanda Alves da Cunha. "Ponderação e critérios racionais de decidibilidade na argumentação judicial." Universidade de São Paulo, 2011. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-15052012-103227/.

Full text
Abstract:
O objeto de estudo da presente dissertação corresponde ao sopesamento ou ponderação, método que vem sendo aplicado de modo freqüente em vários países para a resolução de colisões entre direitos fundamentais. Por ser altamente difundido atualmente, muitas vezes o cenário é caracterizado por uma aplicação irrefletida, ou seja, sem maiores questionamentos sobre o método em si. No entanto, existe grande discussão sobre o tema, principalmente sobre se é possível aplicar o sopesamento de forma racional. Neste trabalho, o foco da pesquisa constitui exatamente analisar detalhadamente os problemas de aplicação do método, relacionados à possibilidade do desenvolvimento de critérios racionais de decidibilidade. Em outras palavras, procura-se examinar se é possível considerar o sopesamento um método racional na decisão de colisões entre direitos fundamentais, no intuito de se investigar as possibilidades de fundamentação dos juízos ponderativos, assim como as pretensões de racionalidade, correção ou objetividade que se podem relacionar à técnica. Para isso, a pesquisa examinou o debate teórico sobre sopesamento e, tendo em mente as críticas analisadas, foi realizada análise sobre o conceito de racionalidade possível no direito e sobre a estrutura e modelos de ponderação.<br>The purpose of this paper is to analyze balancing or weighing rights, method that is frequently used worldwide in judicial decisions when principles collide. As its central position in the argumentation of many judicial decisions, the method is often used without a special reflection on its meaning and structure. Notwithstanding, there is a debate about the theme, mainly about if it is possible to use balancing rationally. In this paper, the focus is to analyze the problems related to the method and to the possibility of developing rational criteria. In other words, I seek to examine whether it is possible to consider balancing as a rational method in judicial decisions involving collisions between fundamental rights, in order to investigate the possibilities of reasoning, as well as the claims of rationality, objectivity, or the structure that may relate to the procedure. For this, the research examined the theoretical debate on weighing rights and, after that, studied the concept of rationality possible in law and the structure of weighting models.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Titterington, Lynda Carol. "Case studies in pathophysiology the development and evaluation of an interactive online learning environment to develop higher order thinking and argumentation /." Columbus, Ohio : Ohio State University, 2007. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc%5Fnum=osu1196183110.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Gustavsson, Erik. "Gud - logisk, verklig eller onödig? : en retorisk analys av Richard Dawkins och John Lennox argumentation om Guds existens." Thesis, Högskolan Kristianstad, Sektionen för lärande och miljö, 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-9698.

Full text
Abstract:
This study has its background in the debate about religion and the existence of God, which has been an ongoing issue throughout the Western cultural tradition. Today´s information society has been an impact on the increasing interest for this subject. The essay’s main task is to accomplish a rhetorical analysis of two books, Illusionen om Gud (2008) by atheist Richard Dawkins and Guds dödgrävare (2010) by Christian John Lennox, in order to investigate the authors’ use of rhetorical strategies to influence their audience. The texts are studied using a qualitative approach with the theoretical basis of some well-defined rhetorical variables: ethical, logical and pathetic means of persuasion, propaganda, and the important factor that a message always is presented in a certain context in which the recipients both have their own values and subjects to general truths and common frames of reference. The analysis is intended to convey the rhetorical essence of each author, and uses this image to discuss aims and methods in the communication. Both authors demonstrate varying propagandistic strategies and base their arguments from common context and widely recognized frames of reference. Lennox almost exclusively uses methodological logo arguments, while Dawkins often uses the pathetic persuasion founds.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Belesiotis, Alexandros Sotiris. "Argumentation-based methods for multi-perspective cooperative planning." Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/7535.

Full text
Abstract:
Through cooperation, agents can transcend their individual capabilities and achieve goals that would be unattainable otherwise. Existing multiagent planning work considers each agent’s action capabilities, but does not account for distributed knowledge and the incompatible views agents may have of the planning domain. These divergent views can be a result of faulty sensors, local and incomplete knowledge, and outdated information, or simply because each agent has conducted different inferences and their beliefs are not aligned. This thesis is concerned with Multi-Perspective Cooperative Planning (MPCP), the problem of synthesising a plan for multiple agents which share a goal but hold different views about the state of the environment and the specification of the actions they can perform to affect it. Reaching agreement on a mutually acceptable plan is important, since cautious autonomous agents will not subscribe to plans that they individually believe to be inappropriate or even potentially hazardous. We specify the MPCP problem by adapting standard set-theoretic planning notation. Based on argumentation theory we define a new notion of plan acceptability, and introduce a novel formalism that combines defeasible logic programming and situation calculus that enables the succinct axiomatisation of contradictory planning theories and allows deductive argumentation-based inference. Our work bridges research in argumentation, reasoning about action and classical planning. We present practical methods for reasoning and planning with MPCP problems that exploit the inherent structure of planning domains and efficient planning heuristics. Finally, in order to allow distribution of tasks, we introduce a family of argumentation-based dialogue protocols that enable the agents to reach agreement on plans in a decentralised manner. Based on the concrete foundation of deductive argumentation we analytically investigate important properties of our methods illustrating the correctness of the proposed planning mechanisms. We also empirically evaluate the efficiency of our algorithms in benchmark planning domains. Our results illustrate that our methods can synthesise acceptable plans within reasonable time in large-scale domains, while maintaining a level of expressiveness comparable to that of modern automated planning.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Molina, Adriana Madriñan. "El método de división en el Fedro de Platón." Universidade de São Paulo, 2012. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8133/tde-11042013-121800/.

Full text
Abstract:
El objetivo de la presente investigación es exponer y testar una hipótesis exegética y filosófica sobre el método de división propuesto por Platón en el Fedro. Según mi hipótesis, este método de división visa resolver la controversia a través de la formulación de argumentos y contra-argumentos que examinan la consistencia de definiciones opuestas sobre un mismo asunto, con el fin de determinar cuál es su definición correcta. Para esto, en el primer capítulo explico las principales nociones del método del Fedro y describo el modus operandi de este método. En el segundo y en el tercer capítulo, testo el modus operandi antes descrito a través de la evidencia textual del Fedro.<br>The aim of the present research is to expose and test an exegetical and philosophical hypothesis about Plato´s division method in his dialogue Phaedrus. According to my hypothesis, Plato´s division is a method that aims to resolve controversies via the formulation of arguments and counterarguments that test the consistency of opposed definitions. Consequently, the method ends with a correct definition. To achieve this aim, in chapter 1, I explain the principal notions of the method and describe the modus operandi of this method. In chapter 2 and chapter 3, I submit to critical examination the aforementioned modus operandi through the textual evidence founded in Phaedrus.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Miranda, Ynga Diana Milagro. "Experiencia de aplicación del ABP para la redacción de textos argumentativos en estudiantes de la Universidad Nacional de Tumbes." Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC), 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/325538.

Full text
Abstract:
El presente trabajo investiga la aplicación del Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas (ABP) como metodología didáctica innovadora, que propicia, como logro, la producción de textos argumentativos. El experimento se aplicó en los estudiantes de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la Universidad Nacional de Tumbes. El ABP se sustenta en los principios del aprendizaje activo y colaborativo, caracterizándose por fomentar, al mismo tiempo, la adquisición de conocimientos y actitudes. Asimismo, promueve la investigación para solucionar problemas, la creación de productos, el pensamiento crítico, el trabajo en equipo, la comunicación y la tolerancia. En esta investigación, se aplicó una prueba de desarrollo de la producción textual a una muestra de 75 alumnos de primer ciclo de la Universidad Nacional de Tumbes. Al medir dicha capacidad, se comparó la diferencia entre dos grupos (experimental y de control), aplicando la metodología, en ambos, al iniciar sus estudios (pre-prueba) y al finalizar el experimento (postprueba). Los resultados confirmaron la hipótesis del trabajo: la aplicación del ABP incidió en la producción de textos argumentativos. La post-prueba determinó que el grupo experimental mejoró significativamente dicha competencia (en 28 por ciento respecto a su rendimiento inicial, y en 23 por ciento respecto al grupo de control). El estudio evidenció que el ABP, frente al tradicional, constituye un método más adecuado para desarrollar la capacidad de producir textos.<br>Revisión por pares
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Klatt, Matthias. "Theorie der Wortlautgrenze : semantische Normativität in der juristischen Argumentation /." Baden-Baden : Nomos Verl.-Ges, 2004. http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/recht/toc/379191849.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Argumentation method"

1

Perella, Jack. The debate method of critical thinking: An introduction to argumentation. Kendall/Hunt Pub. Co., 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Descartes, René. Regulae ad directionem ingenii =: Rules for the direction of the natural intelligence : a bilingual edition of the Cartesian treatise on method. Rodopi, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Leitner, Heinrich. Systematische Topik: Methode und Argumentation in Kants kritischer Philosophie. Königshausen & Neumann, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Straub, Jürgen. Historisch-psychologische Biographieforschung: Theoretische, methodologische und methodische Argumentationen in systematischer Absicht. R. Asanger, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Anderson, R. Dean. Glossary of Greek rhetorical terms connected to methods of argumentation, figures and tropes from Anaximenes to Quintilian. Peeters, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Apel, Karl-Otto. Understanding and explanation: A transcendental-pragmatic perspective. MIT Press, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Thür, Ralf. Anything goes, Paul Karl Feyerabends Argumentation in 'Against Method'. GRIN Verlag GmbH, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Fa lü lun zheng: Si wei yu fang fa = Legal argumentation : legal thinking and method. Beijing da xue chu ban she, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Walton, Douglas. Methods of Argumentation. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Methods of Argumentation. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Argumentation method"

1

van Eemeren, Frans H. "The Pragma-Dialectical Method of Analysis and Evaluation." In Argumentation Library. Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_27.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Pfarr-Harfst, Mieke, and Marc Grellert. "The Reconstruction – Argumentation Method." In Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection. Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48496-9_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Cellucci, Carlo. "The Analytic Method." In Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning. Springer Netherlands, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6091-2_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Klein, Jonas, Isabelle Kuhlmann, and Matthias Thimm. "Cluster-Specific Rule Mining for Argumentation-Based Classification." In Robust Argumentation Machines. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63536-6_4.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractWe present a multi-step classification approach that combines classical machine learning methods with computational models for argumentation. In the first step, the dataset is divided into different groups using a clustering algorithm. In the second step, we employ rule-learning algorithms to extract frequent patterns and rules from each resulting cluster. In the last step, we interpret the rules as the input for structured argumentation approaches. Given a new observation, we first assign it to one of the previously generated clusters. Subsequently, the classification of the observation is determined by formulating arguments based on the respective cluster-specific rules for the different classes. Finally, the justification status of the arguments is determined using the argumentative inference method of the structured argumentation approach.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Cellucci, Carlo. "Logic, Method and Knowledge." In Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning. Springer Netherlands, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6091-2_17.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Cellucci, Carlo. "The Analytic-Synthetic Method." In Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning. Springer Netherlands, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6091-2_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Cellucci, Carlo. "The Method of Modern Science." In Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning. Springer Netherlands, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6091-2_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Bengel, Lars, Lydia Blümel, Tjitze Rienstra, and Matthias Thimm. "Argumentation-Based Probabilistic Causal Reasoning." In Robust Argumentation Machines. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63536-6_13.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractWe introduce an argumentation-based approach for conducting probabilistic causal reasoning. For that, we consider Pearl’s causal models where causal relations are modelled via structural equations and a probability distribution over background atoms. The probability that some causal statement holds is then computed by constructing a probabilistic argumentation framework and determining its extensions. This framework can then be used to generate argumentative explanations for the (non-)acceptance of the causal statement. Furthermore, we present an argumentation-based version of the twin network method for dealing with counterfactuals. Finally, we show that our approach yields the same results for causal and counterfactual queries as Pearl’s model.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Cellucci, Carlo. "Logic, Method and Psychology of Discovery." In Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning. Springer Netherlands, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6091-2_13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Moore, Holly. "Does Plato Have a Theory of Induction? Epagōgē and the Method of Collection “Purified” of the Senses." In Argumentation Library. Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70817-7_9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Argumentation method"

1

Russo, Fabrizio, Anna Rapberger, and Francesca Toni. "Argumentative Causal Discovery." In 21st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning {KR-2023}. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/kr.2024/88.

Full text
Abstract:
Causal discovery amounts to unearthing causal relationships amongst features in data. It is a crucial companion to causal inference, necessary to build scientific knowledge without resorting to expensive or impossible randomised control trials. In this paper, we explore how reasoning with symbolic representations can support causal discovery. Specifically, we deploy assumption-based argumentation (ABA), a well-established and powerful knowledge representation formalism, in combination with causality theories, to learn graphs which reflect causal dependencies in the data. We prove that our method exhibits desirable properties, notably that, under natural conditions, it can retrieve ground-truth causal graphs. We also conduct experiments with an implementation of our method in answer set programming (ASP) on four datasets from standard benchmarks in causal discovery, showing that our method compares well against established baselines.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Rossie, Juliete, Jérôme Delobelle, Sébastien Konieczny, Clément Lens, and Srdjan Vesic. "Collective Satisfaction Semantics for Opinion Based Argumentation." In 21st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning {KR-2023}. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/kr.2024/59.

Full text
Abstract:
Voting on arguments in a debate is a natural approach for reaching a consensual decision. Despite this, there are few formal methods of abstract argumentation dealing with the use of votes in the process of selecting accepted arguments. We introduce the Opinion Based Argumentation (OBA) framework, where individuals can vote (or abstain) for or against arguments in a Dung argumentation framework. Our research aims to determine the most appropriate collective decisions within this framework. We propose a new semantics for this framework, called Collective Satisfaction Semantics (CSS), to evaluate the acceptability of arguments and study their properties. Additionally, we compare these semantics against alternative methods adapted from related literature to provide insights into their relative effectiveness.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Saha, Sougata, and Rohini Srihari. "Integrating Argumentation and Hate-Speech-based Techniques for Countering Misinformation." In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.622.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Rapberger, Anna, and Markus Ulbricht. "Repairing Assumption-Based Argumentation Frameworks." In 21st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning {KR-2023}. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/kr.2024/57.

Full text
Abstract:
The field of formal argumentation is driven by situations where conflicting information need to be balanced out argumentatively. However, if the given knowledge base does not induce any reasonable viewpoint, these methods are stretched to their limits. In this paper, we address this issue in the context of assumption-based argumentation (ABA). More specifically, we study repairing notions for knowledge bases where no assumption can be accepted. We develop genuine repairing techniques for ABA, based on the modification of the building blocks of ABA frameworks, i.e., rules and assumptions. Thereby, we start from basic operators towards more and more fine-grained approaches. We compare their behavior to each other and demonstrate their compliance with suitable repairing desiderata.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Gould, Adam, Guilherme Paulino-Passos, Seema Dadhania, Matthew Williams, and Francesca Toni. "Preference-Based Abstract Argumentation for Case-Based Reasoning." In 21st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning {KR-2023}. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/kr.2024/37.

Full text
Abstract:
In the pursuit of enhancing the efficacy and flexibility of interpretable, data-driven classification models, this work introduces a novel incorporation of user-defined preferences with Abstract Argumentation and Case-Based Reasoning (CBR). Specifically, we introduce Preference-Based Abstract Argumentation for Case-Based Reasoning (which we call AA-CBR-P), allowing users to define multiple approaches to compare cases with an ordering that specifies their preference over these comparison approaches. We prove that the model inherently follows these preferences when making predictions and show that previous abstract argumentation for case-based reasoning approaches are insufficient at expressing preferences over constituents of an argument. We then demonstrate how this can be applied to a real-world medical dataset sourced from a clinical trial evaluating differing assessment methods of patients with a primary brain tumour. We show empirically that our approach outperforms other interpretable machine learning models on this dataset.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Pimenov, Ivan S., and Natalia V. Salomatina. "An Automatic Method for Standartizing Argumentative Annotations across Annotators." In 2024 IEEE 25th International Conference of Young Professionals in Electron Devices and Materials (EDM). IEEE, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/edm61683.2024.10615176.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Muti, Arianna, Federico Ruggeri, Khalid Al Khatib, Alberto Barrón-Cedeño, and Tommaso Caselli. "Language is Scary when Over-Analyzed: Unpacking Implied Misogynistic Reasoning with Argumentation Theory-Driven Prompts." In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.1174.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Yin, Xiang, Nico Potyka, and Francesca Toni. "CE-QArg: Counterfactual Explanations for Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks." In 21st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning {KR-2023}. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/kr.2024/66.

Full text
Abstract:
There is a growing interest in understanding arguments' strength in Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (QBAFs). Most existing studies focus on attribution-based methods that explain an argument's strength by assigning importance scores to other arguments but fail to explain how to change the current strength to a desired one. To solve this issue, we introduce counterfactual explanations for QBAFs. We discuss problem variants and propose an iterative algorithm named Counterfactual Explanations for Quantitative bipolar Argumentation frameworks (CE-QArg). CE-QArg can identify valid and cost-effective counterfactual explanations based on two core modules, polarity and priority, which help determine the updating direction and magnitude for each argument, respectively. We discuss some formal properties of our counterfactual explanations and empirically evaluate CE-QArg on randomly generated QBAFs.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Xiao, Ruiyu, Lei Wu, Yuhang Gou, Weinan Zhang, and Ting Liu. "Prove Your Point!: Bringing Proof-Enhancement Principles to Argumentative Essay Generation." In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.1058.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Sviridova, Ekaterina, Anar Yeginbergen, Ainara Estarrona, Elena Cabrio, Serena Villata, and Rodrigo Agerri. "CasiMedicos-Arg: A Medical Question Answering Dataset Annotated with Explanatory Argumentative Structures." In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.1026.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Argumentation method"

1

Faktorngpan, Piyanart. An investigation of successful argumentative strategies in debating. Language Institute, Chulalongkorn University, 2012. https://doi.org/10.58837/chula.res.2012.76.

Full text
Abstract:
This study operates from the foundation that some arguments are more successful than others; some being more persuasive and convincing. Arguments adjudged successful by experts in the field of argumentation were examined, with specific interest in the evaluation of the rhetoric employed. This corpus of material was formed from speeches, interviews and other data previously recorded from the final rounds of competitive and prestigious international debates. The debate aspect was primarily composed of championship-winning speeches, judged by experienced grand final adjudicators on three constitutionally-specified categories: matter, manner and method. The research questions fundamental to this study are centered on different aspects of reasoning for this possible success. While no study might be exhaustive at this stage of examination, given the dearth of previous research findings related to debate tactics, the research parameters were thus: strategies and style for making and delivering arguments; the four types of argument patterns; the A-R-E Model (Assertion-Reasoning-Evidence making a complete argument) in terms of their frequency and common moves; and the use of particular language communicative functions, speech patterns and vocabulary. Together, these provide a very useful insight into how successful arguments are formed and what makes them such. The paper ends with findings and implications for English language teaching, argumentation and negotiation, and for debate training and coaching as well as suggested further studies to enhance effective cooperative and competitive English communication to prepare young Thai people for their role in the forthcoming ASEAN Economic Community.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Yatsymirska, Mariya, and Bohdan Markevych. MEDIA TEXTS AND PERSUASION. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/vjo.2024.54-55.12170.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract. The article clarifies specific concepts of persuasion in media texts; describes new techniques of media influence based on materials of online publications; shows the role of expressive means of language and emotions in visual communication. In social communication, persuasive logos refer to meaningful words and thoughts conveyed through mass media and logically perceived as a reasonable persuasion to proper actions based on the principles of morality, ethics, and culture; informational and influential accents. In modern science (Philosophy, Psychology, Rhetoric, Linguistics), logos has acquired not only new meanings, but also has become an important concept of rational expression of free ideas, meanings, reflections. From this perspective, new media serve as the most concentrated source of logosphere and eidosphere creation, which should be thoroughly studied and analyzed every day. The research on multimedia texts, genre diversity, new platforms, and online publications has significantly contributed to the Media Studies. Techniques of persuasive communication, methods of argumentation, and verbal tools form a separate area of the research within the field. Unlike manipulation, persuasion is the conscious use of written or spoken language, interactive visualization, and infographics to influence someone’s beliefs, views, or actions; gain someone’s support, approve the suggested ways of behavior, intentions, etc. Means of persuasion in media texts serve as logical information accents aimed at the proper perception of the corresponding meanings. In general, factors of persuasion are to influence the masses and the motivation of their actions, modify views, and form public opinion. In journalism, these are meaningful words, thoughts, principles of high-quality narrative with the use of convincing arguments, facts and, most importantly, positive intentions for the readers. Persuasive media texts exclude manipulation of public opinion, trust and people’s inclination to perceive doctrines imposed on them. Keywords: persuasion, concept, visual information, social communication.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Argumentation method' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography