Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Aristotle’s triangle of rhetoric

Contents

Journal articles

Academic literature on the topic 'Aristotle’s triangle of rhetoric'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 15 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Aristotle’s triangle of rhetoric.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Aristotle’s triangle of rhetoric"

1

Talaue, Gilbert Macalanda. "Aristotle's Rhetorical Triangle in Advertising." Journal of Media Management and Entrepreneurship 2, no. 2 (2020): 54–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jmme.2020070104.

Full text

Abstract:

This study aims to validate the influence of Aristotle's rhetorical triangle—ethos, pathos, and logos—to the behavior of Saudi Arabian consumers, focusing particularly on consumer product. Quantitative and qualitative methods including descriptive research design were used. Two hundred respondents participated in the study. Results shows that age has impact to influence respondent's preference of Aristotle's rhetorical appeals. However, educational attainment has no influence on respondents' behavior towards Aristotle's rhetorical appeals. Fifty-seven percent of the respondents perceived ethos

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Louden, Robert B. "Aristotle’s Rhetoric." Ancient Philosophy 16, no. 1 (1996): 241–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil199616136.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Meyer, Michel. "Aristotle’s Rhetoric." Topoi 31, no. 2 (2012): 249–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11245-012-9132-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Poster, Carol. "Rereading Aristotle’s Rhetoric." Ancient Philosophy 21, no. 2 (2001): 502–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil200121236.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Dow, Jamie. "Proof-Reading Aristotle’s Rhetoric." Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 96, no. 1 (2014): 1–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/agph-2014-0002.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Rizvi, Sajjad H. "Aristotle’s Rhetoric in the East." American Journal of Islam and Society 27, no. 2 (2010): 117–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v27i2.1334.

Full text

Abstract:

The Late Antique Aristotelian tradition inherited by the world of earlyIslam in the Near East considered the Rhetoric an integral part of one’straining in logic and reasoning. Thus far, however, there has been little academicinterest in it, apart from Deborah Black’s ground-breaking monographpublished some two decades ago and the recent edition in MarounAouad’s translation and study of Ibn Rushd’s commentary on it. Vagelpohl’srevised Cambridge dissertation is a careful historical and linguisticstudy of its translation and naturalization in Syriac (less so) and Arabiclearned culture in the Near

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Castañeda, Ana Jimena Casillas. "Aristotle’s Rhetoric in Trump’s Hate Speech." OALib 03, no. 09 (2016): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102916.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Rapp, Christof. "Fallacious Arguments in Aristotle’s Rhetoric II.24." History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis 15, no. 1 (2012): 122–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.30965/26664275-01501006.

Full text

Abstract:

Just as Aristotelian dialectic sharply distinguishes between real and fallacious arguments, Aristotelian rhetoric distinguishes between real and fallacious enthymemes. For this reason Aristotle’s Rhetoric includes a chapter – chapter II.24 – that is exclusively devoted to what Aristotle calls “topoi” of fallacious enthymemes. Thus, the purpose of this chapter seems to be equivalent to the purpose of the treatise Sophistici Elenchi, which attempts to give a complete list of all possible types of fallacious arguments. It turns out that, although the Rhetoric’s list of fallacious types of rhetori

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Cichocka, Helena. "On the Reception of Aristotle’s Rhetoric in Byzantium." Peitho. Examina Antiqua, no. 1(3) (February 11, 2013): 231–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/pea.2012.1.11.

Full text

Abstract:

The paper deals with the reception of Aristotle’s definition of rhetoric(Rhet. I 1355b26–27) in several Byzantine commentators of Hermogenes’and Aphthonius’ treatises. A justification of critical interpretationof this definition is to be found in the commentaries of Troilus and Athanasius(4th/5th century) as well as Sopatros (6th century) and Doxapatres(11th century), Maximus Planudes (13th/14th century) and several anonymouscommentators. The Byzantine tradition has found Aristotle’s definitionof rhetoric to be all too theoretical and insufficiently connected topractical activity, which Byzant

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Crider, Scott. "Passions and Persuasion in Aristotle’s Rhetoric (Jamie Dow)." American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90, no. 4 (2016): 754–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/acpq2016904101.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!