Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Armenian Revolutionary Federation

Contents

Journal articles
Books
Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Armenian Revolutionary Federation'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 31 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Armenian Revolutionary Federation.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Armenian Revolutionary Federation"

1

AVCI, Halil Ersin. "Pawns of Empire: Unraveling the Role of Dashnaktsutyun in British Geopolitical Strategy (1890-1922)." International Journal of Social Sciences 8, no. 33 (January 12, 2024): 38–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.52096/usbd.8.33.04.

Full text

Abstract:

This paper examines the instrumental role of Dashnaktsutyun, also known as the Armenian Revolutionary Federation, in the geopolitical strategies of the British Empire during the early 20th century. Initially emerging as a nationalist movement within the Ottoman Empire, Dashnaktsutyun was co-opted by external powers, particularly Britain, to serve broader imperial interests in the Eurasian region. The study delves into the organization’s activities in the Ottoman, Russian, and Iranian territories, highlighting how its operations, under the guise of Armenian nationalism, were significantly influenced by British geopolitical objectives. The paper also explores the complex interplay between nationalist movements and international power politics, particularly in the context of the Great Game between the British and Russian Empires. A critical analysis of Dashnaktsutyun’s role during key historical events, such as the Soviet invasion of Armenia in 1920, reveals a prioritization of foreign directives over national resistance, impacting the trajectory of Armenian history and reflecting the broader dynamics of early 20th-century imperialism. This study serves as a cautionary tale of how nationalist movements can be redirected by external influences, often at the expense of their foundational principles and the welfare of their people. Keywords: Dashnaktsutyun, Armenian Revolutionary Federation, British Geopolitical Strategy, Armenian Nationalism, Imperialism, Soviet Invasion of Armenia, Great Game, Pan-Islamism, Pan-Turanism

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Maslo, Amer. "Echoes of the News About the Attempted Assassination of Sultan Abdul Hamid II Among the Muslim Intelligentsia from Bosnia and Herzegovina Gathered Around the Bošnjak Gazette." Archiv orientální 91, no. 1 (July 1, 2023): 19–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.47979/aror.j.91.1.19-39.

Full text

Abstract:

In the second half of July 1905, the Belgian anarchist Edward Joris and members of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation attempted to assassinate the Ottoman Sultan Abdul Hamid II in Istanbul. The Sultan survived, but the lives of numerous civilians were lost. The first part of this paper reviews the assassination attempt, its participants, and its political background, whereas the second part analyzes how this event was presented to Muslims from Bosnia and Herzegovina in the political press at the time, with a special review of the echoes it had among the Muslim intelligentsia gathered around the Bošnjak gazette.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Varak Ketsemanian. "Straddling Two Empires: Cross-Revolutionary Fertilization and the Armenian Revolutionary Federation's Military Academy in 1906–07." Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association 4, no. 2 (2017): 339. http://dx.doi.org/10.2979/jottturstuass.4.2.06.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Shunyakov, Dmitriy. "The Introduction and Practice of Awarding Orders of the Soviet Republics During the Civil War (1917–1922)." Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series Humanitarian and Social Sciences, no. 4 (September 21, 2021): 13–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-v113.

Full text

Abstract:

This article analyses the military award practice in the Red Army during the Civil War. The author turned to archival materials, published data from official statistics, and scientific literature. The study is based on the principles of historicism, objectivity, and systematic approach. In order to process quantitative data, statistical analysis was used to calculate the results obtained by means of continuous sampling. Due to the abolition of the pre-revolutionary award system, new awards had to be created in parallel with the formation of the Red Army. The first award established in the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR) was the Order of the Red Banner. Initially, it was awarded to individuals; over time it could also be re-awarded and presented to military units. Other Soviet republics – Ukrainian, Byelorussian, Armenian, Azerbaijan and Georgian – followed this example and established their own orders, which had much in common in terms of composition and meaning. The overwhelming majority of the awards presented during the Civil War were the Order of the Red Banner of the RSFSR. To optimize the award process, military personnel were divided into four categories, one category being authorized to award another. The total number of awards was small, only about 0.001 % of military personnel were awarded this order. The most awarded were Red Army soldiers, while the most frequently re-awarded were the upper echelons of military power – unit and formation commanders. The dynamic and socially determined nature of the Civil War explains the prevailing number of awards presented to servicemen in cavalry, artillery and armoured forces. The largest number of awards was given in 1922. The results of the study allow us to draw a conclusion about the democratic nature of the award system during the Civil War in Russia, as well as about the high motivational effect of these awards.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Yeranosyan, Manyak. "Կ. ՊՈԼՍՈՒՄ ՌՈՒՍԱՍՏԱՆԻ ԴԵՍՊԱՆ Ն. ՉԱՐԻԿՈՎԻ ԳԱՂՏՆԻ ԶԵԿՈՒՅՑԸ ՍԻՄՈՆ ԶԱՎԱՐՅԱՆԻ ԵՎ ՀԱԿՈԲ ԶԱՎՐՅԱՆԻ ՀԵՏ ԻՐ ՀԱՆԴԻՊՄԱՆ ՄԱՍԻՆ (1911 Թ. ԴԵԿՏԵՄԲԵՐ)." Vem Pan-Armenian Journal, 2023, 288–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.57192/18291864-2023.4-288.

Full text

Abstract:

In the early 1910s, Russia's repressive policy towards Armenian political parties, especially the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutyun), has undergone certain changes. This fact is explained by an attempt to attract Eastern and Western Armenians to the side of Russia in the context of regional changes at the beginning of the 20th century.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Badalyan, Armen. "ՀԿ(Բ)Կ ԿԵՆՏԿՈՄԻ ՆԱԽԱԳԱՀՈՒԹՅԱՆ և ՔԱՐՏՈՒՂԱՐՈՒԹՅԱՆ ՈՐՈՇՈՒՄՆԵՐԸ ԱՍԴԽՀ և ԽՍՀՄ ԿԱԶՄԱՎՈՐՄԱՆ ՄԱՍԻՆ (1921–1922 ԹԹ.) / DECISIONS OF THE PRESIDIUM AND SECRETARIAT OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE COMMUNIST (BOLSHEVIK) PARTY OF ARMENIA ON THE BIRTH OF THE TSFSR AND THE USSR (1921–1922)." Աշխատություններ Հայաստանի պատմության թանգարանի / Transactions of the History Museum of Armenia, 2023, 20–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.56653//18290361-2023.11-20.

Full text

Abstract:

On November 29, 1920, the Revolutionary Committee of Armenia (Revkom) published a decree declaring Armenia a Soviet state. In the decree it was mentioned that with the establishment of Soviet power all disputes with Azerbaijan will end forever. The members of the Revkom foresaw Soviet Armenia united in one family with other Soviet republics. The leadership of Soviet Russia was also for the union of Soviet states. The resolution ofthe 10th Congress of the Communist (Bolshevik) Party of Russia stressed the in convenience of separate existence of Soviet republics and the eecessity of their unification in a single state structure, the best form of which was to be the Soviet Federation. The relations between the Soviet states were regulated by the Communist (Bolshevik) Party organs. The Caucasian Bureau of C(B)PR was heading the integration process between the three Soviet republics of Transcaucasia. The first step was to create economic union between them. The integration process started with the unification of railways of these three states, to be followed by steps to unify their foreign trade. In 1921–1922, the Presidium and Secretariat of C(B)PA have discussed these matters in approximately 40 sessions. The discussions included not only the organizational aspects of these matters, but also problems of securing with cadres the two federal state structures (the Transcaucasian Soviet Federal Socialist Republic and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics). All important issues were discussed in the sessions of the Presidium of the Central Committee of C(B)PA; the Secretariat dealt with cadres’ appointment issues. It is worth to notice that during the whole process of formation of TSFSR and USSR neither the Presidium, nor the Secretariat of the CC of C(B)PA rejected to any of the issues presented by the CC of C(B)PR, that is they played only the role of unconditional performer of the orders of the center in Moscow.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Armenian Revolutionary Federation"

1

Tasnapetean, Hrachʼ. History of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation, Dashnaktsutiun, 1890-1924. Milan, Italy: Oemme Edizioni, 1990.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Dasnabedian, Hratch. History of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation: Dashnaktsutiun, 1890-1924. Oemme Edizioni, 1990.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Dimankar hariwrameay H.H.D.i. Frēzno: Tp. Mshak, 1991.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Matossian, Bedross Der, ed. The Armenian Social Democrat Hnchakian Party. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780755651337.

Full text

Abstract:

This book, based on new research, sheds light on the history of the Social Democrat Hnchakian Party, a major Armenian revolutionary party that operated in the Ottoman Empire, Turkish Republic, Russia, Persia and throughout the global Armenian diaspora. Divided into sections which cover the origins, ideology, and regional history of the SDHP, the book situates the history of the Hnchaks within debates around socialism, populism, and nationalism in the 19th and 20th centuries. The SDHP was not only an Armenian party but had a global Marxist outlook, and scholars in this volume bring to bear expertise in a wide range of histories and languages including Russian, Turkish, Persian and Latin American to trace the emergence and role this influential party played from their split with the Armenian Revolutionary Federation and the events of the Armenian genocide to the formation of the first Armenian Republic and then Soviet Armenia. Putting the Hnchaks in context as one of many nationalist radical groups to emerge in Eurasia in the late 19th century, the book is an important contribution to Armenian historiography as well as that of transnational revolutionary movements in general.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Armenian Revolutionary Federation"

1

Minassian, Gaïdz. "The Armenian Revolutionary Federation and Operation ‘Nejuik’." In To Kill a Sultan, 35–65. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48932-6_2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Ekmekçioğlu, Lerna. "Cohabitating in Captivity: Vartouhie Calantar Nalbandian (Zarevand) at the Women’s Section of Istanbul’s Central Prison (1915–1918)." In Documenting the Armenian Genocide, 39–71. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36753-3_4.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractVartouhie Calantar Nalbandian (1893–1978), the only Armenian woman known to have been arrested by the Ottoman Turkish authorities in Istanbul in the spring of 1915, was born in Bursa to a Russian Armenian father and an Ottoman Armenian mother. One of the first generation of Armenian girls who received a European university education, Vartouhie sent letters home from Lausanne that would change the course of her life. In 1915, the Ottoman police raided the family home as Tavit Kalantar had been a high-level educator in Armenian schools. They found Vartouhie’s letters to her parents and her father’s papers, which they claimed included incriminating evidence. In August 1915, a military tribunal convicted Vartouhie and her father of propagating Armenian separatist ideology. They served two-and-a-half years in Constantinople’s Central Prison and, thanks to their Russian citizenship, were released after the Bolsheviks signed the Brest-Litovsk Treaty with the Central Powers, requiring “prisoners of war” to be freed.Vartouhie published her prison memoirs in 16 installments in the feminist journal Hay Gin (Armenian Woman), the first prison memoir by a woman in the Middle East and one of the very few for the Ottoman Empire. In 1921, Vartouhie emigrated to the US, where she married Zaven Nalbandian, a high-level Armenian Revolutionary Federation member who participated in Operation Nemesis. In 1926, they published an important book in Armenian on the pan-Turkic movement under the penname Zarevand. In 1971, the newly minted sociology professor Vahakn Dadrian translated their book into English as United and Independent Turania: Aims and Designs of the Turks. Their historical and political analysis, the first study of the Armenian Genocide in the United States, argues that Turkish irredentism had been a real threat for Armenians who stood in the way of the unification of Turkic peoples under one state. This chapter writes a hitherto unknown feminist and historian into Armenian, Turkish, and Ottoman historiographies as well as genocide and prison studies.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Panossian, Razmik. "The Diaspora and the Karabagh Movement: Oppositional Politics between the Armenian Revolutionary Federation and the Armenian National Movement." In The Making of Nagorno-Karabagh, 155–77. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230508965_6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

"The Armenian Revolutionary Federation or Dashnaktsuthiun, 1890–1896." In The Armenian Revolutionary Movement, 151–78. University of California Press, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jj.15280397.10.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

"VII The Armenian Revolutionary Federation or Dashnaktsuthiun, 1890-1896." In The Armenian Revolutionary Movement, 151–78. University of California Press, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/9780520377141-008.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Altıntaş, Toygun. "The Abode of Sedition: Resistance, Repression and Revolution in Sasun, 1891–1904." In Age of Rogues, 178–207. Edinburgh University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474462624.003.0006.

Full text

Abstract:

This article will investigate the transformation of Sasun, a remote mountainous region inhabited by Armenian and Muslim peasants as well as Kurdish pastoralists, into a zone of contention between the Hamidian regime and the Armenian revolutionary movement. The conflict in Sasun became a cause célèbre of imperial and international significance and was followed closely by foreign journalists and diplomats, Ottoman and Russian Armenians, government officials, and Sultan Abdülhamid II himself. Using Ottoman and British archival sources as well as the official organs of the Hnchak Party and the Armenian Revolutionary Federation, the article will foreground subjects and practices of resistance and repression during this period. Doing so will allow us to trace the process by which local encounters and struggles gained imperial and international import. The article will focus on the period from 1891, when the first Hnchak revolutionary arrived in the region, to 1904, when the Hamidian regime deployed a large military force for the second time to destroy the revolutionary presence and bring the region’s Armenians to heel. It will examine revolutionary tactics and strategies of recruitment, propaganda, and utilization of violence. It will also shed light on Hamidian practices of cooptation, exclusion, criminalization, and collective punishment.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Holmes, Amy Austin. "A Genealogy of Rojava." In Statelet of Survivors, 10–36. Oxford University PressNew York, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197621035.003.0002.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract The origins of Rojava can be traced to the Republic of Mount Ararat, one of the most significant rebellions in the aftermath of the founding of the Turkish Republic. Based on an official treaty of cooperation between the Kurdish Xoybûn League and the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutyun), Mount Ararat declared independence in October 1927. The legacy of the rebellion continues to shape the present. Many of the Kurdish, Assyrian, and Armenian inhabitants of northern Syria describe themselves today as “descendants of survivors” of Ottoman-era pogroms. Furthermore, the Republic of Ararat proclaimed that all inhabitants would be treated equally—regardless of race or religion. This far-reaching commitment to equality is also ensconced in the Social Contract of the Autonomous Administration declared in 2014, and stands in contrast to the founding ideologies of Kemalism in Turkey and Baathism in Syria, which promoted Turkification and Arabization policies vis-à-vis their respective minorities.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Öztan, Ramazan Hakkı. "Chemistry of Revolution: Naum Tyufekchiev and the Trajectories of Revolutionary Violence in the Late Ottoman Europe." In Age of Rogues, 261–301. Edinburgh University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474462624.003.0009.

Full text

Abstract:

This study charts the life of Naum A. Tyufekchiev, a chemist who hailed from the Ottoman Macedonian town of Resen. Educated in Belgium, Tufekchiev participated in multiple assassination plots against figures such as the Bulgarian prime minister and cabinet members, the Bulgarian ambassador to Istanbul, the Ottoman Sultan, and the Iranian Shah. A skillful chemist-turned-revolutionary, he designed his own hand grenades and secured illicit transfer of weapons for a range of revolutionary organizations such as the Armenian Revolutionary Federation, Young Turk committees, Macedonian revolutionaries, and the Bolsheviks. While Tyufekchiev became an asset for various intelligence agencies at different times, he had also cultivated an ideological and materialist agenda of his own. By reconstructing his life story, I hope to utilize Tyufekchiev as a lens to understand the late trans-imperial politics from the late 1880s to the First World War. The goal is to reconstruct the life of a revolutionary figure that is layered, complex, and resistant to simple historical categorizations. In doing so, I would not only be challenging nationalist histories which had dominated the study of Balkan revolutionaries, but also re-assert the central roles played by such entrepreneurs of violence in the construction of identities in Southeastern Europe.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!