Relevant bibliographies by topics / Article retraction / Journal articles
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Article retraction.

Journal articles on the topic 'Article retraction'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 2 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Article retraction.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Tripathi, Manorama, Sharad Kumar Sonkar, and Sunil Kumar. "A cross sectional study of retraction notices of scholarly journals of science." DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 39, no. 2 (2019): 74–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.2.14000.

Full text
Abstract:

 
 
 Retraction is the withdrawal of published article after it is found that the authors did not ensure integrity in conducting and reporting their research activities. The bibliometric information of 4716 document categorised as retractions in Science Citation Index, Web of Science was downloaded and analysed to understand trend, pattern and reasons of retraction. The results showed that retractions had increased during the ten-year period, 2008-2017. The main reasons for retractions were plagiarism, falsified data, manipulation of images and figures. It was also found that just 40 out of 4716 retraction notices had explicitly stated reasons for retracting the published articles. The open access journals had more number of retractions as compared to subscription based journals. The study will guide library professionals and research scholars towards a better comprehension of the reasons behind retractions in science discipline in the ten-year period. They would be better equipped to steer clear of inauthentic publications in their citations and references.
 
 
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Morrison, Wayne A., and Bernard O'brien. "Article Retraction." Cell Transplantation 16, no. 10 (2007): 1071. http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/000000007783472354.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Editorial, E. "Article retraction." Biotehnologija u stocarstvu 34, no. 3 (2018): 369. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/bah1803369e.

Full text
Abstract:
The Editor?s office of the scientific journal Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, is issuing the Note of retraction of the following article - PROTEINS SEQUENCE ANALYSIS OF CONTAGIOUS CAPRINE PLEUROPNEUMONIA by authors Ayuba Dauda, Abdulmojeed Yakubu, Ihe Ndu Dim, Deeve Sebastian Gwaza, published in the journal Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 33 (3), p 309-319, 2017 (Details Full text https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1703309Y) <br><br><font color="red"><b> Link to the retracted article <u><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/BAH1703309Y">10.2298/BAH1703309Y</a></b></u>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Farooqi, Yasmin, Timothy B. Gongaware, and Gerry Cox. "Errata: Article Retraction." Illness, Crisis & Loss 16, no. 4 (2008): v. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/il.16.4.a.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Hua, Susan, and Paul K. Witting. "RETRACTION OF ARTICLE." Current Medicinal Chemistry 17, no. 24 (2010): 2684. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/092986710791859405.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Zhao, Feng. "Retraction: Duplicate Article." American Journal of Rhinology 20, no. 6 (2006): 673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/194589240602000603.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Editorial, E. "Article retraction notice." Veterinarski glasnik 73, no. 1 (2019): 64. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/vetgl190125001e.

Full text
Abstract:
We regretfully announce that the article: ?Dimitrijevic B., Jovic S., Jezdimirovic Milanka, Bacic D., Savic Mila, Jezdimirovic N., Vegara M. 2015, Infekcija ovaca sa Strongyloides papillosus - uticaj intenziteta parazitske infekcije i terapije albendazolom na odredjene biohemijske parametre u krvi ovaca, Veterinarski glasnik 69 (1-2) 41 - 61, DOI 10.2298/VETGL1502041D?, contains results peviously published in the article: ?Dimitrijevic B, Borozan Suncica, Jovic S, Bacic D, Katic-Radivojevic Sofija, Stojanovic S, Savic Mila, 2013. The effect of the intensity of parasitic infection with Strongyloides papillosus and albendazole therapy on biochemical parameters in sheep blood, Acta Veterinaria (Beograd), 63 (5-6), 581-600, DOI: 10.2298/AVB1306581D?. The Editorial Team of the journal Veterinarski Glasnik has decided to retract the paper. Apologies are offered to readers of the journal Veterinarski Glasnik that this error was not detected during the submission process. <br><br><font color="red"><b> Link to the retracted article <u><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/VETGL1502041D">10.2298/VETGL1502041D</a></b></u>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Urednistvo, U. "Article retraction notice." Vojnosanitetski pregled 66, no. 1 (2009): 74. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/vsp0901074u.

Full text
Abstract:
(retraction) The article 'Prognostic significance of acute bundle branch block in patients with acute myocardial infarction' by Mijailovic V, Mrdovic I, Ilic M, Asanin M, Srdic M, Rajic D was retracted at the request of the editors because the authors had infringed the normal professional and ethical codes by submitting the above article to the Vojnosnitetski pregled after an article with substantial overlap of its content (patients, methods,results and conclusions) had been accepted for publication and published in another journal, ABC - casopis urgentne medicine. (1) Mijailovic V, Mrdovic I, Ilic M, Asanin M, Srdic M, Rajic D. 'Prognostic significance of acute bundle branch block in patients with acute myocardial infarction' Vojnosanit Pregl 2008; 65(10): 733-7. (Serbian) (2) Mijailovic V, Mrdovic I, Ilic M, Perunicic J, Asanin M, Lasica R, Savic L, Srdic M, Jozic T, Rajic D, Terzic B, Matic D, Matic M, Vasiljevic Z. 'Prognostic significance of acute bundle branch block with patients suffering from myocardial infarction'. ABC - casopis urgentne medicine 2007; 7(2-3): 104-8. (Serbian) . <br><br><font color="red"><b>Link to the retracted article <u><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/VSP0810733M">10.2298/VSP0810733M</a></b></u></font>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Urednistvo, U. "Article retraction notice." Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research 24, no. 3 (2014): 429. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/yjor141008034u.

Full text
Abstract:
The article ?An interactive algorithm for large scale multiple objective programming problems with fuzzy parameters through TOPSIS approach?, by authors Mahmoud A.ABO-SINNA, Tarek. H.M.ABOU-EL-ENIEN, published in YUJOR, Vol 21, No 2, 2011, was retracted at the request of the editors because the authors infringed professional codes by submitting the above article to YUJOR after their substantialy the same article, with the same title ?An interactive algorithm for large scale multiple objective programming problems with fuzzy parameters through TOPSIS approach?, was accepted for publication and published in another journal, Applied Mathematics and Computation,Volume 177, Issue 2, 15 June 2006, Pages 515?527. <br><br><font color="red"><b> Link to the retracted article <u><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/YJOR1102253A">10.2298/YJOR1102253A</a></b></u>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Psychologia Society. "RETRACTION OF THE ARTICLE." PSYCHOLOGIA 61, no. 4 (2019): 269. http://dx.doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.psysoc.61-4.269.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Anderson, Warwick. "Notice of Retraction of Article." Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology 31, no. 9 (2004): 657–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2004.04047.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

UEDA, Kazumitsu. "Urgent Announcement of Article Retraction." Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 77, no. 11 (2013): 2013R2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1271/bbb.2013r2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Eisenach, James C. "Data Fabrication and Article Retraction." Anesthesiology 110, no. 5 (2009): 955–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e3181a06bf9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Almeida, Renan Moritz Varnier Rodrigues de, Fernanda Catelani, Aldo José Fontes-Pereira, and Nárrima de Souza Gave. "Retractions in general and internal medicine in a high-profile scientific indexing database." Sao Paulo Medical Journal 134, no. 1 (2015): 74–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2014.00381601.

Full text
Abstract:
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Increased frequency of retractions has recently been observed, and retractions are important events that deserve scientific investigation. This study aimed to characterize cases of retraction within general and internal medicine in a high-profile database, with interest in the country of origin of the article and the impact factor (IF) of the journal in which the retraction was made. DESIGN AND SETTING: This study consisted of reviewing retraction notes in the Thomson-Reuters Web of Knowledge (WoK) indexing database, within general and internal medicine. METHODS: The retractions were classified as plagiarism/duplication, error, fraud and authorship problems and then aggregated into two categories: "plagiarism/duplication" and "others." The countries of origin of the articles were dichotomized according to the median of the indicator "citations per paper" (CPP), and the IF was dichotomized according to its median within general and internal medicine, also obtained from the WoK database. These variables were analyzed using contingency tables according to CPP (high versus low), IF (high versus low) and period (1992-2002 versus 2003-2014). The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated for plagiarism/duplication. RESULTS: A total of 86 retraction notes were identified, and retraction reasons were found for 80 of them. The probability that plagiarism/duplication was the reason for retraction was more than three times higher for the low CPP group (RR: 3.4; 95% CI: [1.9-6.2]), and similar results were seen for the IF analysis. CONCLUSION: The study identified greater incidence of plagiarism/duplication among retractions from countries with lower scientific impact.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Serghiou, Stylianos, Rebecca M. Marton, and John P. A. Ioannidis. "Media and social media attention to retracted articles according to Altmetric." PLOS ONE 16, no. 5 (2021): e0248625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248625.

Full text
Abstract:
The number of retracted articles has grown fast. However, the extent to which researchers and the public are made adequately aware of these retractions and how the media and social media respond to them remains unknown. Here, we aimed to evaluate the media and social media attention received by retracted articles and assess also the attention they receive post-retraction versus pre-retraction. We downloaded all records of retracted literature maintained by the Retraction Watch Database and originally published between January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2015. For all 3,008 retracted articles with a separate DOI for the original and its retraction, we downloaded the respective Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) (from Altmetric) and citation count (from Crossref), for the original article and its retraction notice on June 6, 2018. We also compared the AAS of a random sample of 572 retracted full journal articles available on PubMed to that of unretracted full articles matched from the same issue and journal. 1,687 (56.1%) of retracted research articles received some amount of Altmetric attention, and 165 (5.5%) were even considered popular (AAS>20). 31 (1.0%) of 2,953 with a record on Crossref received >100 citations by June 6, 2018. Popular articles received substantially more attention than their retraction, even after adjusting for attention received post-retraction (Median difference, 29; 95% CI, 17–61). Unreliable results were the most frequent reason for retraction of popular articles (32; 19%), while fake peer review was the most common reason (421; 15%) for the retraction of other articles. In comparison to matched articles, retracted articles tended to receive more Altmetric attention (23/31 matched groups; P-value, 0.01), even after adjusting for attention received post-retraction. Our findings reveal that retracted articles may receive high attention from media and social media and that for popular articles, pre-retraction attention far outweighs post-retraction attention.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

IUCr Editorial Office. "Retraction of articles." Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports Online 68, no. 4 (2012): e10-e11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/s1600536811037597.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Ajiferuke, Isola, and Janet O. Adekannbi. "Correction and retraction practices in library and information science journals." Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 52, no. 1 (2018): 169–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961000618785408.

Full text
Abstract:
Retraction of scholarly publications ensures that unqualified knowledge is purged from the scientific community. However, there appears to be little understanding about how this is practiced among library and information science (LIS) journals. Hence, this study investigated the correction and retraction practices of LIS journals. Journals included in the Web of Science’s information science and library science subject category were selected for the study and the characteristics of the articles corrected or retracted in those journals between 1996 and 2016 were examined. Findings show that there were 517 corrections and five retractions in LIS journals during the period. Most of the corrections made to articles in LIS journals were minor while the reasons for article retraction included plagiarism, duplication, irreproducible results and methodological errors. Our findings also reveal that on average it took about 587 days for an article to be retracted while some of the retracted articles continued to be cited after retraction. The study concluded that the average number of errors per correction was lower than what had been observed in medical journals while some of the retracted articles continued to receive positive post-retraction citations. It also recommended the inclusion of a check on the validity of literature cited by authors at the review stage as part of the quality control mechanism by publishers of LIS journals.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Pantziarka, Pan, and Lydie Meheus. "Journal retractions in oncology: a bibliometric study." Future Oncology 15, no. 31 (2019): 3597–608. http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/fon-2019-0233.

Full text
Abstract:
Aim: To investigate secular trends in article retractions in the oncology literature, particularly relating to cancer treatments and data available to patients. Methods: A bibliometric analysis of article retractions from PubMed in the period 2000–2018. Results: Analysis shows that article lifetime – that is the time period from initial publication to ultimate retraction – has decreased in recent years. It also shows that the retraction rate has also increased over the same period. Furthermore, over 20% of retracted oncology publications analyzed in this study relate to treatment-relevant topics such as clinical trials and studies in the anticancer properties of supplements. Conclusion: The causes and context of these trends are discussed and reference made to the dangers of scientific misconduct in oncology.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Santos-d'Amorim, Karen, Rinaldo Ribeiro de Melo, and Raimundo Nonato Macedo dos Santos. "Retractions and post-retraction citations in the COVID-19 infodemic: is Academia spreading misinformation?" Liinc em Revista 17, no. 1 (2021): e5593. http://dx.doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v17i1.5593.

Full text
Abstract:
The speed in producing information and the rush to publish scientific articles on COVID-19 in several knowledge areas have resulted in what is known as an infodemic also in the scientific field, potentially producing inaccurate information and sources of misinformation at scholarly communication. This has led to some articles being retracted or withdrawn due to unintentional errors or deliberate misconduct, but they continue to be cited. This article (i) gives an overview of the COVID-19 retracted articles and preprints, and (ii) analyses a set of post-retraction citations in the context of the COVID-19 infodemic. We analyzed 56 retracted articles and preprints by using the list available in the section on “retracted coronavirus (COVID-19) papers” in the Retraction Watch (RW) webpage. We found that 64.3% of these retractions were articles published in journals, 33.9% were uploaded in preprints servers, and 1.8% conference papers. We also analyzed 162 eligible articles out of 612 records identified by using the Google Scholar search engine. This research found that an article from The Lancet continued to be cited even after being retracted. In this case, we identified 214 post-retraction citations, of which 38% were negative (n=81), 32% were neutral (n=69), and 30% were positive citations (n=64)
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Haynes, R. Brian. "Retraction of Article From ACP Journal Club." Annals of Internal Medicine 151, no. 12 (2009): 897. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00022.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Glasziou, P. "Retraction of article from Evidence-Based Medicine." Evidence-Based Medicine 14, no. 6 (2009): 166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebm.14.6.166-b.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Urednistvo, U. "Information about articles retraction." Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo 138, no. 9-10 (2010): 674. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/sarh1010674u.

Full text
Abstract:
(retraction) Based on the decision of the Editorial Board of the journal 'Serbian Archives of Medicine' made at the meeting of the members of the Editorial Board October 12, 2010, the following articles are retracted from 'Serbian Archives of Medicine' because they were published in other journals in almost identical form ('duplicate publications'): Sveti Luka i njegov kult kao svetog vraca u srpskom narodu Zorica Mitrovic, Ljiljana Markovic, Maja Nenadovic Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo, 2004, vol. 132, br. 9-10, str. 364-368 DOI: 10.2298/SARH0410364M, Previously published in: Arhiv za farmaciju, 2003, vol. 53, br. 6, str. 507-521 Sveti Luka i njegov kult kao svetog vraca u srpskom narodu Zorica Mitrovic. <br><br><font color="red"><b>Link to the retracted article <u><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/SARH0410364M">10.2298/SARH0410364M</a></b></u></font>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Urednistvo, U. "Information about articles retraction." Serbian Dental Journal 57, no. 2 (2010): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/sgs1002001u.

Full text
Abstract:
(retrakcija) Postovani citaoci, Obavestavam Vas da je rad pod naslovom 'Uticaj lasera male snage na zarastanje ostecenja kosti: eksperimentalna istrazivanja', autora Alekse Markovica, Radojice Drazica i Snjezane Colic, koji je objavljen u svesci 2 Stomatoloskog glasnika Srbije za 2009. godinu (vol. 56, str. 86-90), povucen, odnosno ponisten, i ne nalazi se u bazi podataka ovog casopisa. Time se onemogucava navodjenje ovoga rada u bibliografiji potpisanih autora i sprecava njegovo eventualno citiranje. Osnovni razlog ove odluke je cinjenica da je skoro identican rad, ali sa drugim autorima, stampan u casopisu Journal of Laser Application 2005. godine (vol. 5, p.169-172), sto je u suprotnosti s principima dobre naucne prakse i etickim kodeksom naucnoistrazivackog rada. U isto vreme ova odluka je u skladu s principima dobre uredjivacke prakse, odnosno uredjivackom politikom casopisa za koji sam trenutno odgovoran. <br><br><font color="red"><b>Link to the retracted article <u><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/SGS0902086M">10.2298/SGS0902086M</a></b></u></font>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Demagh, K., H. Chabil, and H. Turkia. "Retraction Note: Retraction of a Plagiarized Article: Period of vibrations of framed structures." Materials and Structures 45, no. 4 (2012): 637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9838-x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Dal-Ré, Rafael, and Carmen Ayuso. "Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018." Journal of Medical Genetics 56, no. 11 (2019): 734–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106137.

Full text
Abstract:
IntroductionBetween 0.02% and 0.04% of articles are retracted. We aim to: (a) describe the reasons for retraction of genetics articles and the time elapsed between the publication of an article and that of the retraction notice because of research misconduct (ie, fabrication, falsification, plagiarism); and (b) compare all these variables between retracted medical genetics (MG) and non-medical genetics (NMG) articles.MethodsAll retracted genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018 were retrieved from the Retraction Watch database. The reasons for retraction were fabrication/falsification, plagiarism, duplication, unreliability, and authorship issues. Articles subject to investigation by company/institution, journal, US Office for Research Integrity or third party were also retrieved.Results1582 retracted genetics articles (MG, n=690; NMG, n=892) were identified . Research misconduct and duplication were involved in 33% and 24% of retracted papers, respectively; 37% were subject to investigation. Only 0.8% of articles involved both fabrication/falsification and plagiarism. In this century the incidence of both plagiarism and duplication increased statistically significantly in genetics retracted articles; conversely, fabrication/falsification was significantly reduced. Time to retraction due to scientific misconduct was statistically significantly shorter in the period 2006–2018 compared with 1970–2000. Fabrication/falsification was statistically significantly more common in NMG (28%) than in MG (19%) articles. MG articles were significantly more frequently investigated (45%) than NMG articles (31%). Time to retraction of articles due to fabrication/falsification was significantly shorter for MG (mean 4.7 years) than for NMG (mean 6.4 years) articles; no differences for plagiarism (mean 2.3 years) were found. The USA (mainly NMG articles) and China (mainly MG articles) accounted for the largest number of retracted articles.ConclusionGenetics is a discipline with a high article retraction rate (estimated retraction rate 0.15%). Fabrication/falsification and plagiarism were almost mutually exclusive reasons for article retraction. Retracted MG articles were more frequently subject to investigation than NMG articles. Retracted articles due to fabrication/falsification required 2.0–2.8 times longer to retract than when plagiarism was involved.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Böttiger, Lars Erik. "Retraction of the article: Modified lipoproteins in diabetes." Journal of Internal Medicine 238, no. 3 (1995): 293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.1995.tb00937.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Stovold, Elizabeth Margaret. "Open Access Works are as Reliable as Other Publishing Models at Retracting Flawed Articles from the Biomedical Literature." Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 9, no. 3 (2014): 86. http://dx.doi.org/10.18438/b8qk6d.

Full text
Abstract:
A Review of:
 Peterson, G.M. (2013). Characteristics of retracted open access biomedical literature: a bibliographic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(12), 2428-2436. doi: 10.1002/asi.22944
 
 Abstract
 
 Objective – To investigate whether the rate of retracted articles and citation rates post-retraction in the biomedical literature are comparable across open access, free-to-access, or pay-to-access journals.
 
 Design – Citation analysis.
 
 Setting – Biomedical literature.
 
 Subjects – 160 retracted papers published between 1st January 2001 and 31st December 2010.
 
 Methods – For the retracted papers, 100 records were retrieved from the PubMed database and 100 records from the PubMed Central (PMC) open access subset. Records were selected at random, based on the PubMed identifier. Each article was assigned a number based on its accessibility using the specific criteria. Articles published in the PMC open access subset were assigned a 2; articles retrieved from PubMed that were freely accessible, but did not meet the criteria for open access were assigned a 1; and articles retrieved through PubMed which were pay-to-access were assigned a 0. This allowed articles to be grouped and compared by accessibility.
 
 Citation information was collected primarily from the Science Citation Index. Articles for which no citation information was available, and those with a lifetime citation of 0 (or 1 where the citation came from the retraction statement) were excluded, leaving 160 articles for analysis. Information on the impact factor of the journals was retrieved and the analysis was performed twice; first with the entire set, and second after excluding articles published in journals with an impact factor of 10 or above (14% of the total). The average number of citations per month was used to compare citation rates, and the percentage change in citation rate pre- and post-retraction was calculated. Information was also collected on the time between the date the original article was published and the date of retraction, and the availability of information on the reason for the retraction. 
 
 Main results – The overall rate of retracted articles in the PMC open access subset compared with the wider PubMed dataset was similar (0.049% and 0.028% respectively). In the group with an accessibility rating of 0, the change in citation rate pre- and post-retraction was -41%. For the group with an accessibility rating of 1, the change was -47% and in those with a rating of 2, the change in citation rate was -59%. Removing articles published in high impact factor journals did not change the results significantly. Retractions were issued more slowly for free access papers compared with open or fee-based articles. The bibliographic records for open access articles disclosed details of the reason for the retraction more frequently than free, non-open papers (91% compared to 53%).
 
 Conclusion – Open access literature is similar in its rate of retraction and the reduction in post-retraction citations to the rest of the biomedical literature, and is actually more reliable at reporting the reason for the retraction.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Pradhana, Adinda Putra. "Statement of Retraction." Neurologico Spinale Medico Chirurgico 3, no. 2 (2020): 76. http://dx.doi.org/10.36444/nsmc.v3i2.123.

Full text
Abstract:
Article title: “Hemopneumothorax associated with pneumorrachis following blunt chest trauma”
 Authors: Putu Eka Mardhika, Tjokorda Gde Bagus Mahadewa, Citra Aryanti
 Bibliometrics: Volume 2, Issue 2, pages 33-36
 DOI: 10.36444/nsmc.v2i2.10
 
 Neurologico Spinale Medico Chirurgico with Indoscholar is retracting the paper titled “Hemopneumothorax associated with pneumorrachis following blunt chest trauma” by Putu Eka Mardhika, Tjokorda Gde Bagus Mahadewa, Citra Aryanti, published in Volume 2, Issue 2, pages 33-36. Upon investigation, it was determined that a similar article, titled the same was submitted by the authors and simultaneously published in another journal (redundant publication)
 As a result, the article published in Neurologico Spinale Medico Chirurgico has been retracted and should not be cited in the electronic or print version of the journal.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

El-Ahmady, A. E. "Limits of fuzzy retractions of fuzzy hyperspheres and their foldings." Tamkang Journal of Mathematics 37, no. 1 (2006): 47–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.5556/j.tkjm.37.2006.178.

Full text
Abstract:
This article introduces the types of fuzzy retractions of fuzzy hyperspheres $ \tilde{S}^n\subset R^{n+1} $ and the corresponding induced fuzzy retractions of the two fuzzy systems $ \bigcup \overline{\tilde{S}}^n $, $ \bigcup \underline{\tilde{S}}^n $ when the fuzzification is regular or irregular. Also, the fuzzy folding of fuzzy hyperspheres $ \tilde{S}^n $ into itself and the induces two chains of fuzzy folding of $ \bigcup \overline{\tilde{S}}^n $, $ \bigcup \underline{\tilde{S}}^n $. The relations between the fuzzy folding and fuzzy retraction are obtained. The limits of fuzzy retractions and fuzzy folding are achieved.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Pérez, Salomón, Carolina Gonzalez, Adewale Oparinde, Ekin Birol, and Manfred Zeller. "Announcement of Retraction." Journal of Agricultural Studies 6, no. 4 (2018): 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jas.v6i4.13916.

Full text
Abstract:
The editorial board announced this article has been retracted on November 28, 2018.If you have any further question, please contact us at: jas@macrothink.org Article Title: The Role of Respondents’ Market Participation in Consumer Acceptance of Seeds and Grains of an Iron-Enriched Bean Variety in GuatemalaAuthor/s: Salomón Pérez, Carolina Gonzalez, Adewale Oparinde, Ekin Birol, Manfred ZellerJournal Title: Journal of Agricultural StudiesISSN 2166-0379 Volume and Number: Vol. 6, No. 4, 2018Pages: 36-53DOI: 10.5296/jas.v6i4.13916
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Lazennec, Gwendal. "Retraction: Article on Estrogen Receptor β in Ovarian Carcinogenesis". Cancer Research 65, № 12 (2005): 5480.3–5480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-correction3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Kivela, Paul D. "Additional Information Regarding Request for Retraction of Ho Article." Annals of Emergency Medicine 70, no. 6 (2017): 864–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.08.010.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Nair, Singh, Chetra Yean, Jennifer Yoo, Jonathan Leff, Ellise Delphin, and David C. Adams. "Reasons for article retraction in anesthesiology: a comprehensive analysis." Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 67, no. 1 (2019): 57–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01508-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Vuong, Quan-Hoang, Viet-Phuong La, Manh-Tung Ho, Thu-Trang Vuong, and Manh-Toan Ho. "Characteristics of retracted articles based on retraction data from online sources through February 2019." Science Editing 7, no. 1 (2020): 34–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.6087/kcse.187.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose: Although retractions are commonly considered to be negative, the fact remains that they play a positive role in the academic community. For instance, retractions help scientific enterprise perform its self-correcting function and provide lessons for future researchers; furthermore, they represent the fulfillment of social responsibilities, and they enable scientific communities to offer better monitoring services to keep problematic studies in check. This study aims to provide a thorough overview of the practice of retraction in scientific publishing from the first incident to the present.Methods: We built a database using SQL Server 2016 and homemade artificial intelligence tools to extract and classify data sources including RetractionWatch, official publishers’ archives, and online communities into ready-to-analyze groups and to scan them for new data. After data cleaning, a dataset of 18,603 retractions from 1,753 (when the first retracted paper was published) to February 2019, covering 127 research fields, was established.Results: Notable retraction events include the rise in retracted articles starting in 1999 and the unusual number of retractions in 2010. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Elsevier, and Springer account for nearly 60% of all retracted papers globally, with Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers contributing the most retractions, even though it is not the organization that publishes the most journals. Finally, reasons for retraction are diverse but the most common is “fake peer review”.Conclusion: This study suggests that the frequency of retraction has boomed in the past 20 years, and it underscores the importance of understanding and learning from the practice of retracting scientific articles.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Lopatin, Evgeniy. "Retraction: Assessment of Russian banking system performance and sustainability." Banks and Bank Systems 14, no. 3 (2019): 202–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(3).2019.17.

Full text
Abstract:
Retracted on August 17, 2020 by the Journal’s owner and Publisher. Type of retraction – plagiarism.There wasn’t a request for this retraction, but the reason for investigation of plagiarism fact was the Russian Academy of Sciences Committee’s report “Predatory Journals at Scopus and WoS: Translation Plagiarism from Russian Sources”: https://kpfran.ru/wp-content/uploads/plagiarism-by-translation-2.pdf” dated August 12, 2020. The publishing house has familiarized itself with the report. The article by Alexey Mikhaylov, Natalia Sokolinskaya and Evgeniy Lopatin (2019). Asset allocation in equity, fixed-income and cryptocurrency on the base of individual risk sentiment. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 16(2), 171-181. doi:10.21511/imfi.16(2).2019.15 was mentioned in this report. It is noted that translation plagiarism was detected in this article - http://wiki.dissernet.org/wsave/IMFI_2019_2_1publ.html. Due to this the publishing house carried out an investigation on possible cases of plagiarism of all articles of these authors (Alexey Mikhaylov, Natalia Sokolinskaya and Evgeniy Lopatin) published in “Business Perspectives” journals. When the manuscript "Assessment of Russian banking system performance and sustainability" was submitted to the Journal for consideration, the authors signed the Cover letter and attested to the fact that their manuscript is an original research and has not been published before. Then, the manuscript was accepted for consideration by the Managing Editor and was tested for plagiarism using the iThenticate and Unicheck programs. Plagiarism was not detected. On August 12, 2020 the Russian Academy of Sciences Committee’s presented the report. Editorial staff decided to re-test all articles of mentioned authors for plagiarism using the iThenticate and Unicheck programs – the programs didn’t show the plagiarism, then the articles were tested for translation plagiarism by the experts of “Business Perspectives” and plagiarism was detected (plagiarism and paraphrases from Russian-language sources). According to the results of the investigation, the Publisher and owner of the journal decided to retract this article because of plagiarism on August 17, 2020.The authors were notified of such a decision.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Taylor, James Stacey. "The Case Against the Case for Colonialism." International Journal of Applied Philosophy 32, no. 1 (2018): 19–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/ijap2018820100.

Full text
Abstract:
In a recent paper entitled “The Case for Colonialism” Bruce Gilley argued that Western colonialism was “as a general rule” both beneficial to those subject to it and considered by them to be legitimate. He then advocated for a return to the Western colonization of the Third World. Gilley’s article provoked a furious response, with calls for its retraction being followed by the resignation of much of the publishing journal’s editorial board. In this paper I note that Gilley’s article meets none of the criteria required to justify its retraction, and that instead of retracting it it should be rebutted. I then argue that his arguments against those who oppose colonialism are all fatally flawed, and that he has provided no justification for his claims that colonialism was either beneficial to those who lived under it, or considered by them to be legitimate.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Wang, Sophia. "Announcement of Retraction." Journal of Mathematics Research 9, no. 2 (2017): 115. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jmr.v9n2p115.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Yu, Gavin. "Announcement of Retraction." English Language Teaching 4, no. 2 (2011): 84. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p84.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Robinson, Mark. "Announcement of Retraction." Education and Linguistics Research 4, no. 1 (2018): 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/elr.v4i1.12533.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Williams, Richard. "Announcement of Retraction." Journal of Agricultural Studies 5, no. 1 (2017): 114. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jas.v5i1.10977.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Sun, Barbara. "Announcement of Retraction." Journal of Education and Learning 6, no. 1 (2016): 54. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p54.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Yu, Gavin. "Announcement of Retraction." English Language Teaching 5, no. 8 (2012): 57. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n8p57.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Tarawneh, Fatima Al. "Announcement of Retraction." Asian Social Science 13, no. 11 (2017): 54. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n11p54.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Zhang, Jenny. "Announcement of Retraction." Asian Social Science 13, no. 7 (2017): 83. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n7p83.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Zhang, Jenny. "Announcement of Retraction." Asian Social Science 16, no. 7 (2020): 110. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v16n7p110.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Williams, Richard. "Announcement of Retraction." Journal of Agricultural Studies 5, no. 4 (2018): 131. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jas.v6i1.12534.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Oudah, Ali, Izzeldin I. Mohd, and A. Hameed. "Announcement of Retraction." Modern Applied Science 8, no. 5 (2014): 247. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/mas.v8n5p247.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Mallet, Robert T., Albert H. Olivencia-Yurvati, and Rolf Bünger. "Pyruvate-enriched resuscitation for shock." Experimental Biology and Medicine 243, no. 8 (2018): 663–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1535370218773717.

Full text
Abstract:
This commentary addresses the recent retraction of an article which reported favorable outcomes in septic patients treated with intravenous pyruvate. The retracted report was cited in the authors’ recent minireview on the cellular mechanisms and clinical application of pyruvate to improve cardiac performance. Because the retracted article reports pyruvate-enhanced resuscitation of critically ill patients, the authors wish to inform the readership, especially critical care providers, that this particular clinical application of pyruvate is not now supported by robust evidence. After discussing the retraction’s implications for the clinical application of pyruvate-enriched resuscitation for sepsis, this commentary summarizes the extensive preclinical evidence of the efficacy and mechanisms of pyruvate resuscitation in animal models of hemorrhagic and septic shock, which argues for renewed clinical investigation of pyruvate-enriched resuscitation. Impact statement This commentary addresses the recent retraction of a clinical report of significant benefits of intravenous pyruvate resuscitation in septic patients, including sharply lowered mortality and decreased circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines, which was cited in the authors’ minireview in Experimental Biology and Medicine. The potential implications of the retraction, and the extensive preclinical evidence supporting the use of pyruvate-enriched resuscitation for shock states, are summarized and discussed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Candal-Pedreira, Cristina, Alberto Ruano-Ravina, Esteve Fernández, Jorge Ramos, Isabel Campos-Varela, and Mónica Pérez-Ríos. "Does retraction after misconduct have an impact on citations? A pre–post study." BMJ Global Health 5, no. 11 (2020): e003719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003719.

Full text
Abstract:
BackgroundRetracted articles continue to be cited after retraction, and this could have consequences for the scientific community and general population alike. This study was conducted to analyse the association of retraction on citations received by retracted papers due to misconduct using two-time frames: during a postretraction period equivalent to the time the article had been in print before retraction; and during the total postretraction period.MethodsQuasiexperimental, pre–post evaluation study. A total of 304 retracted original articles and literature reviews indexed in MEDLINE fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Articles were required to have been published in a journal indexed in MEDLINE from January 2013 through December 2015 and been retracted between January 2014 and December 2016. The main outcome was the number of citations received before and after retraction. Results were broken down by journal quartile according to impact factor and the most cited papers during the preretraction period were specifically analysed.ResultsThere was an increase in postretraction citations when compared with citations received preretraction. There were some exceptions however: first, citations received by articles published in first-quartile journals decreased immediately after retraction (p<0.05), only to increase again after some time had elapsed; and second, postretraction citations decreased significantly in the case of articles that had received many citations before their retraction (p<0.05).ConclusionsThe results indicate that retraction of articles has no association on citations in the long term, since the retracted articles continue to be cited, thus circumventing their retraction.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Braude, Stephen. "JSE's First Retraction." Journal of Scientific Exploration 35, no. 1 (2021): 5–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.31275/20212077.

Full text
Abstract:
This issue of the JSE includes a retraction of a paper by Alejandro Parra that we published in 2017. As far as I can determine, it’s the journal’s first official retraction of a published paper. The reason for this action is the author’s extensive plagiarism, both in that paper and in other published work (including a recent book whose publisher has since recalled all copies). It’s a sad state of affairs, of course—and perhaps the first of its kind in this particular and admittedly minor scientific domain.
 But it reminds me that six years ago, in Volume 29(2), we published a paper on retractions in science, and in that issue I seized the opportunity to editorialize further on the subject. I recycle that Editorial below. But before that, I must note that careful examination has found no additional evidence of plagiarism in the one other research article (in 2018) and the one book review we’ve published by Parra. I must also mention that, henceforth, the JSE will run routine plagiarism tests on papers accepted for publication. I thought this was a chore I’d left behind when I retired from teaching. However, I don’t want the JSE to emulate the person who said “I’ve learned from my mistakes, and I’m certain I can repeat them exactly.”
 EDITORIAL FROM JSE VOLUME 29(2), 189–192
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography