Relevant bibliographies by topics / Atlantic burden-sharing / Books
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Atlantic burden-sharing.

Books on the topic 'Atlantic burden-sharing'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 18 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 24 books for your research on the topic 'Atlantic burden-sharing.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

A, Cooper Charles. Perceptions of NATO burden-sharing. Santa Monica, CA: Rand, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

1954-, Jones David, and Center for Strategic and International Studies (Washington, D.C.), eds. Burden sharing: The wrong issue. Washington, D.C: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Weber, Shlomo. Burden sharing in NATO: An economic analysis. Toronto: York University, Dept. of Economics, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

J, Cimbala Stephen, ed. The US, NATO, and military burden-sharing. New York, NY: F. Cass, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Zycher, Benjamin. A generalized approach for analysis of alliance burden-sharing. Santa Monica, CA (1700 Main St., Santa Monica 90406-2138): RAND, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Harris, Paul G. Sharing the burden?: The Euro-Atlantic community and global environmental change. Badia Fiesolana, San Domenico (FI): European University Institute, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Army War College (U.S.). Strategic Studies Institute and Army War College (U.S.). Press, eds. Stepping up: Burden sharing by NATO's newest members. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kent, Forster Peter, ed. Multinational military intervention: NATO policy, strategy and burden sharing. Farnham, England: Ashgate Pub. Co., 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Cimbala, Stephen J. Multinational military intervention: NATO policy, strategy, and burden sharing. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate Pub. Co., 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Sharing the burden-- sharing the lead?: Euro-atlantische Arbeitsteilung im Zeichen des allianzinternen Sicherheitsdilemmas. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Office, General Accounting. U.S.-NATO burden sharing: Allies' contributions to common defense during the 1980s : report to the chairman, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Office, General Accounting. U.S.-NATO burden sharing: Allies' contributions to common defense during the 1980s : report to the chairman, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Office, General Accounting. U.S.-NATO burden sharing: Allies' contributions to common defense during the 1980s : report to the chairman, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Office, General Accounting. U.S.-NATO burden sharing: Allies' contributions to common defense during the 1980s : report to the chairman, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Office, General Accounting. U.S.-NATO burden sharing: Allies' contributions to common defense during the 1980s : report to the chairman, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Laderman, Charlie. Sharing the Burden. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190618605.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
The destruction of the Armenian community in the Ottoman Empire was an unprecedented tragedy. Theodore Roosevelt was adamant that it was the “greatest crime” of the First World War. The mass killing of approximately one million Armenian Christians was the culmination of a series of massacres that Winston Churchill would recall had roused publics on both sides of the Atlantic and inspired fervent appeals to see the Armenians “righted.” This book explains why the Armenian struggle for survival became so entangled with the debate over the United States’ international role as it rose to world power at the turn of the twentieth century. In doing so, it provides a fresh perspective on the role of humanitarian intervention in US foreign policy, Anglo-American relations and the emergence of a new international order after World War One. The clash over the US responsibility to protect the Armenians encapsulated the nation’s conflict over its global position and was a central preoccupation of both Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. For American and British leaders, a US intervention in the Near East to secure an independent Armenia was key to establishing a revised international system and to their visions for the new League of Nations. The debate over safeguarding the Armenians reveals the values that animated American society during a pivotal period in its history. In forcing US politicians to grapple for the first time with atrocities on this scale, it also demonstrates dilemmas in humanitarian politics that continue to bedevil policymakers today.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

US, NATO and Military Burden-Sharing. Taylor & Francis Group, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

NATO burden sharing and the three percent commitment. Washington, D.C: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service, ed. NATO burden sharing and the three percent commitment. Washington, D.C: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Christopher, Coker, ed. Shifting into neutral?: Burden sharing in the Western Alliance in the 1990's. London: Brassey's, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Defense burden sharing: U.S. relations with NATO allies and Japan. [Washington, D.C.]: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service, ed. Defense burden sharing: U.S. relations with NATO allies and Japan. [Washington, D.C.]: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

NATO Missile Defense and the Eurpoean Phased Adaptive Approach: The Implications of Burden Sharing and the Underappreciated Role of the U. S. Army. U. S. Army War College, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Sperling, James, and Mark Webber. NATO Operations. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198790501.003.0052.

Full text
Abstract:
In the post-cold-war period, NATO’s mission has shifted from static territorial defence against a well-defined adversary to expeditionary missions against ill-defined adversaries along the entire conflict spectrum. We trace the evolution of NATO security strategies and the attendant changes in allied threat perception, purpose, and force structure, the range and kinds of military operations between 1990 and 2016, and military exercises undertaken after the Russian annexation of Crimea. We then assess allied contributions to those operations (burden- and risk-sharing) and the selective participation of allies in operations (risk-assuming and risk-shirking). A final substantive concern is the growing capabilities gap among the allies, its implications for future allied operations, and its consequences for the alliance. The conclusion addresses the key question facing the alliance: should NATO abandon expeditionary operations and return to static territorial defence consistent with the original intent of the North Atlantic Treaty?
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography