Relevant bibliographies by topics / Aut dedere aut judicare

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Aut dedere aut judicare'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 9 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Aut dedere aut judicare.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Aut dedere aut judicare"

1

Caligiuri, Andrea. "Governing International Cooperation in Criminal Matters: The Role of the aut dedere aut judicare Principle." International Criminal Law Review 18, no. 2 (April 17, 2018): 244–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01802005.

Full text
Abstract:
The aim of the study is to ascertain how the original Grotian formula ‘aut dedere aut punire’ has been implemented and evolved in international law. The first step is to classify the multilateral conventions that have accepted an aut dedere aut judicare clause. The goal is to bring out peculiarities of the different treaty texts, describing the relationship between the two options dedere and judicare, and the different obligations that arise for the contracting states. We will then examine the content of the two options, to define the legal boundaries within which the contracting states shall or may operate. At this point, we will focus on the legal nature of the aut dedere aut judicare principle that over time may have risen to the status of customary rule. The study will conclude with analysis of reactions to the breach of the aut dedere aut judicare clause by non-complying countries.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

van Elst, Richard. "Implementing Universal Jurisdiction Over Grave Breaches of the Geneva Conventions." Leiden Journal of International Law 13, no. 4 (December 2000): 815–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0922156500000480.

Full text
Abstract:
As the most serious war crimes (grave breaches) should not be left unpunished, the 1949 Geneva Conventions contain an unusually worded obligation to either prosecute such a suspected war criminal or to hand him over to another country to be tried there (aut judicare aut dedere in stead of aut dedere aut judicare). Fifty years on, less than one in six of the parties to the Conventions have established universal jurisdiction over grave breaches which is necessary to prosecute a suspect if he was to be found in their country. An assessment and classification of the Conventions, national laws, prosecutions and practical obstacles. But if, what God forbid, these Conventions should ever have to be applied, they must be obeyed.M.W. Mouton, Diplomatic Conference, Geneva 16 July 1949
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Plachta, Michael. "Aut Dedere Aut Judicare: An Overview of Modes of Implementation and Approaches." Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 6, no. 4 (December 1999): 331–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1023263x9900600402.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Rabbat, Paul. "AUT DEDERE AUT JUDICARE: CONSTITUTIONAL PROHIBITIONS ON EXTRADITION AND THE STATUTE OF ROME." Revue québécoise de droit international 15, no. 1 (2002): 179. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1069417ar.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Plachta, Michael. "Extradition and the Principle aut dedere aut judicare in the New Polish Legislation." European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 6, no. 2 (1998): 94–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157181798x00120.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Hill, Robin E. "Airport violence and the legal principleAut Dedere Aut Judicare." Terrorism and Political Violence 1, no. 1 (January 1989): 79–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546558908427015.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Nagy, Sarah L. "Political Offense Exceptions to United States Extradition Policy: Aut Dedere Aut Judicare (Either Extradite or Prosecute)." Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 1, no. 1 (January 1, 1991): 109–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.18060/17373.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Moyo, Monica P. "Final Report on the Obligation to Extradite or Prosecute (Aut Dedere Aut Judicare) (Int’l L. Comm’n)." International Legal Materials 54, no. 4 (August 2015): 758–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.5305/intelegamate.54.4.0758.

Full text
Abstract:
At its sixty-sixth session in 2014, the International Law Commission completed its final report on the obligation to extradite or prosecute and submitted it to the United Nations General Assembly for consideration at its sixty-ninth session.1 The report concluded the Commission’s work on a topic the General Assembly had long considered important in states’ efforts to cooperate in the prevention of impunity for crimes of international concern.2 The Commission addressed the implementation of the obligation; gaps in the existing conventional regime; the priority between the obligation to prosecute and the obligation to extradite, and the scope of the obligation to prosecute; the relationship between the obligation with erga omnes obligations or jus cogens norms; the customary international law status of the obligation; and other matters of relevance from the general framework created in 2009 for the Commission’s consideration of the topic.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Plachta, M. "The Lockerbie Case: the role of the Security Council in enforcing the principle aut dedere aut judicare." European Journal of International Law 12, no. 1 (February 1, 2001): 125–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejil/12.1.125.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Andenas, Mads, and Thomas Weatherall. "II. INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE: QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE OBLIGATION TO EXTRADITE OR PROSECUTE (BELGIUM v SENEGAL) JUDGMENT OF 20 JULY 2012." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62, no. 3 (July 2013): 753–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020589313000250.

Full text
Abstract:
This case1 marks the first pronouncement by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the obligation to extradite or prosecute (aut dedere aut judicare) in international law. It is the second contentious case in which the ICJ has held the defendant country in breach of its obligations under a human rights convention. The ICJ both added to the corpus of norms it has formally recognized as peremptory norms (jus cogens) and also reinforced the principle that former heads of state are subject to universal jurisdiction for grave violations of international law.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Aut dedere aut judicare"

1

Ušinskas, Eugenijus. "Ekstradicijos problemos: žmogaus teisės, atsisakymo tenkinti ekstradiciją pagrindai ir principas „ aut dedere aut judicare”." Master's thesis, Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), 2005. http://vddb.library.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2004~D_20050609_131114-24806.

Full text
Abstract:
This work deals with the problems of extradition: human rights in the process of extradition, grounds for refusal of extradition end strengthening the principle aut dedere aut judicare in extradition. The introductory part, after a short extradition legal definition review, is devoted to argumentation of this subject in connection with the reality of Lithuania: presentation figures of surrendered Lithuanian citizens, display the cost from Lithuanian state budget for extradition of citizens. It is emphasized, that although there has been a long history of study and experiences in the field of extradition, however there is need in Lithuania for deeper study of particular issues on extradition : that is human rights questions in extradition, analysis of grounds for refusal. The main purpose of this work was, based on the studies of other authors, after comparative analysis of international conventions, international treaties including also analysis of Lithuanian Criminal Procedure Code, after review of the European Court of Human Rights practice, to what particular human rights arises threat to be violated or limited without sufficient ground in the extradition process. It is here that the concept of fundamental human rights has emerged and is gaining a widespread acceptance and this group of rights has been recognized as non-derogable in all universal and regional legal instruments. In the examination of grounds for refusal of extradition an attempt... [to full text]
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Panov, Stoyan Minkov. "The obligation aut dedere aut judicare ('extradite or prosecute') in international law : scope, content, sources and applicability of the obligation 'extradite or prosecute'." Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2016. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/6521/.

Full text
Abstract:
The thesis focuses on the scope, content, sources and applicability of the obligation aut dedere aut judicare pertaining to certain international crimes such as genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, the prohibition of torture, drug trafficking, hijacking of civil aviation and terrorist bombing and financing of terrorism in international law. The general framework of the thesis focuses on the legal base of the obligation aut dedere aut judicare, the scope and content of the obligation, the triggering mechanisms of the duty, and state responsibility for preaches of the obligation. The relevant core crimes and transnational crimes are examined in relation to the obligation, based on and formulated in various multilateral, widely-ratified conventions and state practice. State practice and opinio juris indicate that a customary aut dedere aut judicare duty has formed or crystallized for certain international crimes such as the prohibition of torture, genocide, grave breaches of international humanitarian law, including war crimes, and crimes against humanity. As regards the offences against the safety of civil aviation and hijacking, terrorism-related crimes, international drug trafficking, and crimes against UN personnel, the evidence is mixed and it is more appropriate to conclude that an emerging custom of the obligation 'extradite-or-prosecute' for these crimes is forming.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Lundborg, Ida. "Att ställa den skyddsbehövande inför rätta : Om de rättsliga förutsättningarna för att förhindra skyddslöshet vid tillämpningen av Flyktingkonventionens uteslutandeklausuler och samtidigt motverka straffrihet för de grova folkrättsbrott som faller under klausulernas artikel 1F(a)." Thesis, Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, 2010. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-10933.

Full text
Abstract:

The purpose of this study has been to investigate the prospects for identifying and prosecuting individuals suspected of war crimes, within the process of exclusion from refugee status under article 1F(a) of the 1951 Refugee Convention, and using subsequent mechanisms for extradition or prosecution in international criminal law. A number of principles within human rights law and public international law have been advocated by the UNCHR and several human rights NGOs as necessary for a thorough application of the exclusion clauses; one that takes individual responsibility into account and upholds the aims and purposes of the exclusion clauses. There is a discussion as to whether specialised or accelerated exclusion procedures are justified for reasons of security and efficiency, or if they put the rights of the individual at risk and limit the opportunities for gathering information to support investigation and prosecution of the crime in question. Apart from the instruments of asylum law and procedure that have emerged within the EU harmonisation process, there are no general, binding rules on the procedural aspects of the exclusion clauses. One principle that regulates the consequences for the individual of exclusion from refugee status and decisions on extradition is, however, the principle of non-refoulement. Although partly contested in state practice, there is widespread consensus in international jurisprudence and doctrine that the principle, following its status as a jus cogens rule, prohibits every state from returning any individual to a territory where he or she may face torture or other cruel and inhuman treatment or punishment, irrespective of any security risks that the individual may pose to the custodial state.

Extradition or prosecution of individuals suspected of crimes under article 1F(a), based on universal jurisdiction and the principle of aut dedere aut judicare, has gained increased support from international conventions, such as the 1948 Convention on Genocide and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The principles are widely upheld by human rights NGOs, and tendencies in practice and policy among the member states of the EU and the parties to the Rome Statute point towards the development of a customary rule of universal jurisdiction among these states. Continuing resistance to the Rome Statute and to universal jurisdiction among influential states such as the USA, Russia, China and India nevertheless serves to exclude these states from being bound by such an emerging customary rule of universal jurisdiction. There are compelling arguments as to why breaches of jus cogens-rules should include or give rise to erga omnes rights or obligations for all states to exercise universal jurisdiction over such breaches. Without the support of major states it is, however, difficult to establish the existence of the general state acceptance of universal jurisdiction as is required for the principle to attain jus cogens-status and become universally applicable, regardless of state consent. Future prospects for adequate and efficient identification and prosecution of suspected war criminals depend on the correct and thorough application of the exclusion clauses, in combination with the development of existing rules of universal jurisdiction, and not least on the willingness and ability of states to overcome the political, economic and institutional obstacles that presently may prevent many states from extraditing or prosecuting individuals who fall within the scope of article 1F(a) of the exclusion clauses.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Rezai, Shaghaji Danial. "Le pouvoir des États d'agir à l'encontre des violations des droits humains impératifs et des crimes de jus cogens survenus à l'extérieur de leur territoire." Thesis, Brest, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015BRES0023.

Full text
Abstract:
Le droit international classique volontaire basé sur la notion absolue de la souveraineté étatique est remis en cause par l’émergence des règles impératives (jus cogens). A cet égard, la cristallisation des droits humains impératifs est le résultat du processus d’humanisation du droit international moderne où les règles impératives des droits humains de rangs supérieurs se situent au sommet. On peut estimer que l’acceptation des droits humains impératifs créée des obligations erga omnes de protection pour les États membres de la communauté internationale. Dans ce cadre, dans le cas de violations des droits humains impératifs, tous les États sont directement affectés, touchés et lésés par les violations en question et ont le droit d’agir. A cet effet, il nous semble que tous les États peuvent adopter des contre-mesures individuelles à l’encontre de l’État fautif, violateur des droits humains impératifs. Dans le cas de violations des droits humains impératifs, il nous paraît aussi que, sous certaines conditions, les États peuvent recourir à une intervention militaire à but humanitaire, même sans l’avis favorable du Conseil de sécurité des Nations Unies. Aussi, selon certaines conditions, les États peuvent fournir une aide humanitaire aux victimes des violations des droits humains impératifs survenues à l’extérieur de leur territoire, même sans le consentement de l’État territorial. Les États sont aussi tenus de réprimer les crimes de jus cogens commis à l’extérieur de leur territoire. Dans ce contexte, il nous semble que les États en appliquant la règle aut dedere aut judicare, peuvent poursuivre les étrangers suspectés d’avoir commis des crimes de jus cogens. Dans ce cadre, les États doivent appliquer la règle aut dedere aut judicare en respectant l’obligation de non refoulement afin de prévenir les violations des droits humains impératifs à l’étranger. Il nous paraît aussi que les États en appliquant la règle aut dedere aut judicare, doivent prévoir la compétence universelle des juridictions internes. A cet égard, les États peuvent exercer la compétence universelle à l’encontre des crimes de jus cogens commis à l’étranger par l’étranger et sur l’étranger. Dans ce cadre, il nous semble que les États peuvent exercer la compétence universelle absolue. A cet effet, un État peut déclencher une poursuite pénale à l’encontre de l’étranger suspecté d’avoir commis des crimes de jus cogens, même si ce dernier n’est pas présent et/ou en détention sur le territoire de l’État du for. Il nous semble aussi que, l’immunité des hauts représentants d’État, ainsi que les lois d’amnistie étrangères, ne peuvent pas empêcher l’État du for d’exercer la compétence universelle afin de protéger les intérêts généraux de la communauté internationale dans son ensemble
Traditional international law based on absolute notion of state sovereignty, is challenged by theemergence of peremptory norms Çus cogens). In this respect, the crystallization of peremptory humanrights norms is the result of the process of humanization of modern international law where theperemptory human rights norms of superior ranks place at the summit. We could believe that theacceptance of peremptory human rights norms creates erga omnes obligations of protection for States,members of the international community. In this context, in the case of violations of peremptoryhuman rights norms, all States are directly affected and injured by the violations in question and have the right to react. To this end, we believe that all States can adopt individual countermeasures against the wrongdoer state, violator of peremptory human rights norms. In the case of violations ofperemptory human rights norms, under certain conditions, States may resort to military interventionfor humanitarian purposes, even without the autholization of the United Nations Security Council.Also, under certain conditions, States can provide humanitarian aid to victims of violations ofperemptory human rights norms occurred outside their territory, even without the consent of theterritorial state. States are also required to suppress jus cogens crimes committed outside their territory. In this context, we believe that States can apply the principle of aut dedere aut judicare and prosecute aliens suspected of jus cogens crimes. In this context, States that apply the principle of aut dedere aut judicare, must respect the obligation of non-refoulement to prevent violations of peremptory human rights norms abroad. It seems to us that States that apply the principle of aut dedere aut judicare must also apply the principle of universal jurisdiction before their internal courts. In this regard, States can exercise universal jurisdiction againsl jus cogens crimes committed abroad, by foreigners and against foreigners. In this context, we believe that States may exercise the absolute universal jurisdiction. To this end, a State may initiate criminal proceedings against alien suspected of jus cogens crimes, even if helshe is not present and/or in custody in the territory ofthe forum State. It also seems to us that the immunity of senior state representatives and foreign amnesty laws, cannot prevent the forum State to exercise universal jurisdiction in order to protect the general interests of the international community as a whole
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Maierhöfer, Christian [Verfasser]. "»Aut dedere – aut iudicare«. : Herkunft, Rechtsgrundlagen und Inhalt des völkerrechtlichen Gebotes zur Strafverfolgung oder Auslieferung. / Christian Maierhöfer." Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2011. http://d-nb.info/1238351964/34.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Steger, Ruth [Verfasser]. "Aut dedere aut iudicare : Inhalt und aktuelle Entwicklungen rund um die völkerrechtliche Verpflichtung zur Strafverfolgung oder Auslieferung / Ruth Steger." Frankfurt a.M. : Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, 2017. http://d-nb.info/1142096661/34.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Williamson, Myra Elsie Jane Bell. "Terrorism, war and international law: the legality of the use of force against Afghanistan in 2001." The University of Waikato, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10289/2594.

Full text
Abstract:
The thesis examines the international law pertaining to the use of force by states, in general, and to the use of force in self-defence, in particular. The main question addressed is whether the use of force, which was purported to be in self-defence, by the United States, the United Kingdom and their allies against al Qaeda, the Taliban and Afghanistan, beginning on 7 October 2001, was lawful. The thesis focuses not only on this specific use of force, but also on the changing nature of conflict, the definition of terrorism and on the historical evolution of limitations on the use of force, from antiquity until 2006. In the six chapters which trace the epochs of international law, the progression of five inter-related concepts is followed: limitations on the resort to force generally, the use of force in self-defence, pre-emptive self-defence, the use of forcible measures short of war, and the use of force in response to non-state actors. This historical analysis includes a particular emphasis on understanding the meaning of the 'inherent right of self-defence', which was preserved by Article 51 of the United Nations' Charter. This analysis is then applied to the use of force against Afghanistan which occurred in 2001. Following the terrorist attacks of 11 September, the US and the UK notified the United Nations Security Council of their resort to force in self-defence under Article 51. Each element of Article 51 is analysed and the thesis concludes that there are significant doubts as to the lawfulness of that decision to employ force. In addition to the self-defence justification, other possible grounds for intervention are also examined, such as humanitarian intervention, Security Council authorisation and intervention by invitation. This thesis challenges the common assumption that the use of force against Afghanistan was an example of states exercising their inherent right to self-defence. It argues that if this particular use of force is not challenged, it will lead to an expansion of the right of self-defence which will hinder rather than enhance international peace and security. Finally, this thesis draws on recent examples to illustrate the point that the use of force against Afghanistan could become a dangerous precedent for the use of force in self-defence.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kseničová, Anna. "Univerzální jurisdikce a princip aut dedere aut judicare." Master's thesis, 2014. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-338564.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis deals with the topic of universal jurisdiction and the aut dedere aut judicare principle. It also marginally deals with issues of immunity of the perpetrators of international crimes, in relation of them enjoying leading functions of the state. In the introductory chapter of this thesis is discussed concept of jurisdiction as a basis for understanding following content of the next chapter about universal jurisdiction itself. In the chapter about the historical development the emergence of universal jurisdiction is described, through circumstances accompanying the establishment of the Nuremberg Tribunal to internationally significant legal proceedings with Albert Eichmann. In my work I try to bring yet ambiguously defined concept of universal jurisdiction, to elucidate its content and scope of its application areas. In the second part of this thesis I focus on the principle aut dedere aut judicare i.e. obligations of states to prosecute perpetrators of international crimes, present at their territory, or else extradite them to the State, which calls for providing their prosecution. On the case before the International Court of Justice in The Hague in the matter of extradition of former Chadian president by Senegal to Belgium I demonstrate the practical implications of the aut dedere aut...
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Baumruk, Petra. "The Still evolving Principle of Universal Jurisdiction." Doctoral thesis, 2015. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-352952.

Full text
Abstract:
The present study describes the nature, scope and application of universal jurisdiction as an important tool against impunity in international criminal law, in a straight forward manner, where inquiry into the recent developments of universal jurisdiction is undertaken. Forthwith, the formation of the principle of universal jurisdiction - especially its practical application - must be guided by international consensus, not through advocacy action of states with short term and narrow objectives. The thesis seeks to identify and observe how far the law of universal jurisdiction has actually evolved and how far we should expect it to evolve in the near future, considering its restrains and challenges. It is argued that the concept of state sovereignty, which constitutes the greatest impediment on the exercise of universal jurisdiction, has seen various changes to its fundamentals elements in the 21st Century. The aim is to look at the universality principle, not as an isolated part, but as part of a broader framework in modern international law and thus special attention is given to the relationship between universal jurisdiction and the principle of aut dedere aut judicare. These principles are interrelated, yet distinct, parallels in deterring commission of the most heinous offences of international...
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Bentes, Natália Mascarenhas Simões. "A Humanização do Direito Internacional e a responsabilidade penal internacional do indivíduo." Doctoral thesis, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/80174.

Full text
Abstract:
Tese de doutoramento em Direito, no ramo de Direito Público, apresentada à Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra
A partir do século XIX, com a humanização do Direito Internacional, o ser humano passa a ser sujeito de direitos e obrigações na sociedade internacional, tendo por consequência a Responsabilidade Internacional do Estado por violação de Direitos Humanos e a Responsabilidade Internacional Penal do indivíduo pelos Tribunais Penais Internacionais. Em julho de 1998, na Conferência Diplomática de Plenipotenciários das Nações Unidas, foi aprovado para adoção o Estatuto de Roma do Tribunal Penal Internacional com jurisdição criminal permanente, dotado de personalidade jurídica própria, para punição dos crimes internacionais. A Responsabilidade Internacional do indivíduo e os crimes internacionais são provenientes da construção teórica do direito consuetudinário e do conteúdo das normas jus cogens. O princípio da jurisdição universal, o princípio aut dedere aut judicare e o princípio da complementariedade sustentam a constituição do Tribunal Penal Internacional, porém, muitos Estados partes, bem como os Estados não partes não cooperam para a repressão e punição dos crimes de lesa-humanidade no âmbito interno ou não realizam a entrega de Chefes de Estado ao Tribunal Internacional sob a alegação de imunidades internacionais. Fatos que inviabilizam a efetividade da Responsabilidade Penal Internacional no atual Direito Internacional Público. Demonstrará a possibilidade de alargamento da jurisdição internacional penal para todos os Estados e a possibilidade de incluir atos terroristas como crimes contra humanidade em prol da Humanização do Direito Internacional Penal.
From the nineteenth century with the humanization of international law, the human being becomes a subject of rights and obligations in international society, and consequently the International Responsibility of the State for breach of Human Rights and the International Criminal Responsibility of the individual by the Courts International criminal. In July 1998, the United Nations Plenipotentiary Diplomatic Conference was approved to adopt the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court with permanent criminal jurisdiction, with its own legal personality, to punish international crimes. The International Responsibility of the individual and international crimes are from the theoretical construction of the common law and the content of jus cogens norms. The principle of universal jurisdiction, the principle aut dedere aut judicare and the principle of complementarity support the establishment of the International Criminal Court, however, many States Parties and States not parties do not cooperate in the suppression and punishment of crimes against humanity internally or do not realize the delivery of Heads of State to the International Tribunal on the grounds of international immunities. Facts that prevent the effectiveness of the International Criminal Liability in the current Public International Law. It demonstrates the possibility of extending the international criminal jurisdiction to all States and the possibility of including terrorist acts as crimes against humanity towards the Humanization of International Criminal Law.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Aut dedere aut judicare"

1

Camargo, Pedro Pablo. La extradición: Aut dedere aut judicare. Santafé de Bogotá: Editorial Leyer, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Caligiuri, Andrea. L'obbligo aut dedere aut judicare nel diritto internazionale. Milano: Giuffrè editore, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Huo yin du huo qi su: Aut Dedere Aut Judicare. Beijing: Zhongguo zheng fa da xue chu ban she, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

M, Wise Edward, ed. Aut dedere aut judicare: The duty to extradite or prosecute in international law. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Aut dedere aut iudicare: Fragen der internationalen Zusammenarbeit in Auslieferungsverfahren. Wien: NWV, Neuer Wiss. Verl., 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Aut dedere--aut iudicare: Herkunft, Rechtsgrundlagen und Inhalt des völkerrechtlichen Gebotes zur Strafverfolgung oder Auslieferung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Paola, Gaeta. Part III The Right to Justice, B Distribution of Jurisdiction between National, Foreign, International, and Internationalized Courts, Principle 21 Measures for Strengthening the Effectiveness of International Legal Principles Concerning Universal and International Jurisdiction. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198743606.003.0025.

Full text
Abstract:
Principle 21 outlines measures for strengthening the effectiveness of international legal principles concerning universal and international jurisdiction. In particular, it requires states to establish universal criminal jurisdiction and highlights their obligations to prosecute or to extradite (aut dedere aut judicare) states may possess under treaty law. The relationship between dedere and judicare might vary depending on the formulation of the relevant treaty obligation. A controversial issue is whether states can assert ‘pure’ universal criminal jurisdiction, and whether the aut dedere aut judicare treaty based formula is opposable to non-state parties. This chapter first provides a contextual and historical background on Principle 21 before discussing its theoretical framework, focusing on the definition and scope of ‘universal jurisdiction’ and the aut dedere aut judicare principle. It also examines how Principle 21 has been exercised in practice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kriangsak, Kittichaisaree. Part I Prologue, 2 The International Law Commission’s Work on the Obligation to Extradite or Prosecute (aut dedere aut judicare). Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198823292.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter explains the work by the UN International Law Commission on the topic ‘Obligation to extradite or prosecute (aut dedere aut judicare)’ from 2006 to 2014, culminating in the Final Report of the Commission on this topic which was taken note of by the UN General Assembly in 2014. All the legal issues relevant to the obligation are identified and, where appropriate, analysed. The drafting history of the Report by the Working Group under the present author's chairmanship is elucidated in details — and this is the only place where this drafting history can be found.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Decoeur, Henri. The Limits of Applicable Crime-suppression Conventions. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198823933.003.0005.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter 4 highlights the limits of applicable crime-suppression conventions in cases of state organized crime, analysing the practical and normative shortcomings of relevant treaty provisions as well as external procedural bars. It discusses the fragmentation of the applicable law, the limits in politically sensitive cases of a territorial approach to jurisdiction, and of the principles governing extradition proceedings and the obligation aut dedere aut judicare, as well as the international law of immunities shielding state officials from foreign criminal proceedings as well as state property from measures of foreign judicial constraint. It also argues that the existing law fails to fulfil a crucial expressive function by not taking into consideration the involvement of state organs and resources in organized crime.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Decoeur, Henri. A Convention for the Suppression of State Organized Crime. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198823933.003.0007.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter 6 proposes the adoption and discusses the contents of a universal treaty by which states parties would undertake to criminalize state organized crime specifically, to adopt provisions in their domestic law to allow for more effective law enforcement, and to refrain from participating in or supporting organized criminal activities. The proposed treaty is designed to remedy certain of the limits of the existing law. First, it would provide an appropriate legal basis for prosecuting and punishing individuals involved in state organized crime. Secondly, it creates a broad obligation for states parties to establish both territorial and extraterritorial jurisdiction over the proposed crime, and widens the scope of the obligation aut dedere aut judicare, with a view to pressuring states parties genuinely to initiate proceedings against suspected offenders present in their territory. Thirdly, it opens the door for the international responsibility of a state party involved in organized crime.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Aut dedere aut judicare"

1

van Krieken, Peter J. "Aut Dedere Aut Judicare." In Terrorism and the International Legal Order, 33–109. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-447-9_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Soler, Christopher. "Aut Dedere Aut Judicare." In The Global Prosecution of Core Crimes under International Law, 319–401. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-335-1_13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Yap, James. "Aut Deportare Aut Judicare: Current Topics in International Humanitarian Law in Canada." In Applying International Humanitarian Law in Judicial and Quasi-Judicial Bodies, 355–87. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-008-4_13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Mitchell, Claire. "1. Sources of the “aut dedere aut judicare” obligation." In Aut Dedere, aut Judicare: The Extradite or Prosecute Clause in International Law. Graduate Institute Publications, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/books.iheid.301.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

"The obligation to extradite or prosecute (aut dedere aut judicare)." In Report of the International Law Commission, 221–28. UN, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/6e8fe87e-en.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

"La obligación de extraditar o juzgar (aut dedere aut judicare)." In Anuario de la Comisión de Derecho Internacional, 2008, Vol. II, Parte 2, 159–61. UN, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/d97f5321-es.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

"The obligation to extradite or prosecute (aut dedere aut judicare)." In Report of the International Law Commission, 342–47. UN, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/1e630ca8-en.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

"The obligation to extradite or prosecute (aut dedere aut judicare)." In Official Records (United Nations General Assembly), 139–65. UN, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/ccc382c6-en.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

"The obligation to extradite or prosecute (aut dedere aut judicare)." In Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 117–42. UN, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/176f7111-en.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

"Обязательство выдавать или осуществлять судебное преследование (aut dedere aut judicare)." In Ežegodnik Komissii meždunarodnogo prava, Organizaciâ Obʺedinennyh Nacij, 137–68. UN, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/188af868-ru.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Aut dedere aut judicare' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography