To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Award recognition.
Journal articles on the topic 'Award recognition'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Award recognition.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Driscoll, Fletcher G. "SPECIAL RECOGNITION AWARD." Ground Water 26, no. 1 (1988): 94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1988.tb00375.x.
Full text
2
Anderson, Barbara. "AWARD OF RECOGNITION." Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 36, no. 1 (2010): 53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.1989.tb01641.x.
Full text
3
Bisht, D. B. "Citation APACPH Recognition Award." Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 4, no. 4 (1990): 212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/101053959000400404.
Full text
4
Kurniawan, Faizal. "AN ANNULLED AWARD CANNOT BE ENFORCED UNDER THE NEW YORK CONVENTION." Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 17, no. 2 (2017): 171. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.2.784.
Full textAbstract:
Arbitral award is final and binding. A concept of “binding” is fundamental in International arbitral award. Nevertheless, the focus commonly concerns about the annulment and/or deferment of International arbitral award so that it could not be implemented. However, the New York Convention does not govern this issue. In addition, international arbitral awards must meet the following requirements: the award is made in the territory other than conflicting countries, and/ or it is not considered a domestic awards in the State where recognition and enforcement is sought. This is important because the enforcement proceedings between foreign and domestic awards are different. This article elaborates the principles of the recognition and enforcement of a foreign award and the grounds or criteria for refusing to enforce an award are limited to the specific defenses i.e. public policy. The party opposing enforcement bears the burden of proofin the existence of the enumerated defenses.Keywords: binding, annullment, deferment, acknowledgement and enforcement of arbitral award.
5
Thien, LE Nguyen Gia. "Time limit to file petition for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards: a comparative perspective." ASA Bulletin 35, Issue 1 (2017): 95–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/asab2017008.
Full textAbstract:
In most cases, the award debtor will perform his obligations voluntarily. However, if the debtor refuses to comply with the award, the award creditor can seek to have the award recognised and enforced before a competent court. A fundamental issue that the award creditor must consider is the time that is available for him to file a petition for the recognition and enforcement of a foreign award in a given jurisdiction. Statutes and case law address this matter differently. In some jurisdictions, the time limit to file a petition for the recognition and enforcement of a foreign award was very short, ranging from half year to 1 year. In other jurisdictions, time limits are set at 30 years. Still others provide time limits of 3, 5, 6 or even 10 years. This article draws a comparative picture of current statutes and case law relating to time limits for the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards by analysing different jurisdictions from both civil and common law systems.
6
Zaheeruddin, Mohammed. "Recognition and Enforcement of Annulled Arbitral Awards Under the New York Convention 1958." International Journal of Professional Business Review 8, no. 7 (2023): e02637. http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i7.2637.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose: The arbitral awards are enforceable internationally under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958. The Convention provides the discretion to the courts in enforcing State either to enforce or reject the international arbitral awards. The award set aside at the seat of arbitration is not enforceable, however the courts in some jurisdictions enforced such awards. In this context the paper examines how the courts in different jurisdictions justified while enforcing the annulled awards. Theoretical framework: Arbitration mechanism is frequently used for settlement of international commercial disputes. It enables party autonomy in drafting arbitration agreements, choosing the applicable law and determining the arbitration seat. According to Article V (1)(e) of the New York Convention the national courts may refuse to recognize or enforce the foreign award if it was set aside or annulled at the seat of arbitration or under law of which such award was given. In some jurisdictions the enforcing courts considered the annulment procedure followed by the courts and if such procedure was unfair, the courts in enforcing country have agreed to enforce the set aside awards. Design/methodology/approach: The author followed the legal analysis method to examine the approach of the courts from different jurisdictions that have enforced the annulled foreign arbitral awards and the legal comparative method observed to study the judicial decisions from various jurisdictions. Findings: The study concludes that Article V (1) of the New York Convention gives discretionary power to the enforcing courts regarding enforcement of foreign arbitral award. Hence, the courts in some jurisdictions enforced the annulled award if the set aside procedure was unfair, based on local grounds, biased, violated basic norms of justice, against the parties’ agreement or applied domestic law instead of the New York Convention. To secure the enforcement of award, the parties to the arbitration may agree that the arbitral award is not subject to challenge in any court at the arbitration seat or in the state in which the award is enforced and prefer a pro-arbitration State as a seat of arbitration. Research, Practical & Social implications: The study provides practical guidance to the arbitrating parties in drafting arbitration agreements to ensure the enforcement of an arbitration award internationally. Originality/value: The research on enforcement of annulled award under the New York Convention immensely helpful in guiding the arbitration parties in drafting the arbitration agreement, choosing arbitration procedure and seat of arbitration.
7
Thomas, Erin, and Nicole Duclos. "Enforcement of ICSID Awards in the United States." BCDR International Arbitration Review 2, Issue 2 (2015): 373–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2015021.
Full textAbstract:
The ICSID Convention’s self-contained recognition and enforcement regime has long been touted as a unique and, from the perspective of award creditors, favorable feature of the treaty. However, the legislation implementing this regime in the United States does not clearly spell out the procedures that courts must follow in discharging their recognition and enforcement obligations. As a result, U.S. federal courts have adopted diverging approaches to enforcement of ICSID awards. Some courts require award creditors to commence a formal action on the award, while others permit ex parte recognition. This article examines U.S. federal courts’ implementation of their recognition and enforcement obligations under the ICSID Convention, focusing in particular on the current divide regarding proper enforcement procedures and the rationales underlying these divergent approaches.
8
Price, Robert L. "Recognition of Society Award Winners." Microscopy Today 29, no. 3 (2021): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1551929521000626.
Full text
9
Ricard, Richard J. "IAMFC Student Research Award Recognition." Family Journal 15, no. 4 (2007): 381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1066480707305467.
Full text
10
Bosch, Jaume. "EASL Recognition Award Recipient 2015." Journal of Hepatology 63, no. 4 (2015): 787–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.07.019.
Full text
11
García-Pagán, Juan Carlos. "EASL Recognition Award Recipient 2015." Journal of Hepatology 63, no. 4 (2015): 785–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.07.028.
Full text
12
Munhoz, Jose Lucio. "Arbitration Award in Brazil: Recognition and Enforcement." Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management 86, Issue 1 (2020): 68–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/amdm2020006.
Full textAbstract:
This article analyses the current requirements for recognition and enforcement of an arbitration award in Brazil according to the legislation and jurisdictional interpretation provided by the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF—Supremo Tribunal Federal) and Superior Court of Justice (STJ—Tribunal Superior de Justiça).1 The article canvasses the history of arbitration in Brazil, gives a brief account of the evolution of legislation and jurisprudence and details the necessary legal requirements for the arbitration award to be enforced, in accordance with the recent decisions of the STJ. This analysis demonstrates that, in Brazil, it took some time to incorporate arbitration as an effective and independent system for the resolution of conflicts. However, nowadays Brazil is one of the countries which most respects the principles adopted internationally for arbitration, such as guaranteeing the enforcement of arbitration agreements and awards and ensuring judicial cooperation.
13
Baltag, Crina. "Article V(1)(e) of the New York Convention: To Enforce orNot to Enforce Set Aside Arbitral Awards?" Journal of International Arbitration 39, Issue 3 (2022): 397–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2022018.
Full textAbstract:
The recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards which are set aside at the seat continues to be a ‘hot’ topic, triggered by the increasing number of cases in which the prevailing party in the arbitration attempts to enforce such award in various jurisdictions where the assets of the award debtor are located. Such jurisdictions may have different approaches to the application of Article V(1)(e) of theNew York Convention providing for the possibility that courts refuse recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards already set aside. Kluwer Research confirms, that, first, this ground under Article V(1)(e), while the most successfully argued ground under Article V of the New York Convention, is only upheld in 34% of the cases, and that, second, there are diverse approaches of the national courts in assessing such ground, ranging from deference to the courts of the seat of arbitration, to a truly delocalized, transnational approach to the recognition and enforcement of awards. set aside, recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, arbitral awards, local standard annulment, international standard annulment, annulment, seat of arbitration, arbitration
14
Silver, Julie K., Anna M. Bank, Chloe S. Slocum, et al. "Women physicians underrepresented in American Academy of Neurology recognition awards." Neurology 91, no. 7 (2018): e603-e614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000006004.
Full textAbstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate representation by gender among recipients of physician recognition awards presented by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN).MethodsWe analyzed lists of individual recipients over the 63-year history of the AAN recognition awards. Included were awards intended primarily for physician recipients that recognized a body of work over the course of a career. The primary outcome measures were total numbers and proportions of men and women physician award recipients.ResultsDuring the period studied, the proportion of women increased from 18% (1996) to 31.5% (2016) among AAN US neurologist members and from 18.6% (1992) to 35% (2015) in academia, and the AAN presented 323 awards to physician recipients. Of these recipients, 264 (81.7%) were men and 59 (18.3%) were women. During the most recent 10-year period studied (2008–2017), the proportion of women increased from 24.7% (2008) to 31.5% (2016) among AAN US neurologist members and from 28% (2009) to 35% (2015) in academia, and the AAN presented 187 awards to physician recipients, comprising 146 men (78.1%) and 41 women (21.9%). Although it has been more than 2 decades since the proportion of women among US neurologist members of the AAN was lower than 18%, 1 in 4 AAN award categories demonstrated 0% to 18% representation of women among physician recipients during the most recent decade. Moreover, for highly prestigious awards, underrepresentation was more pronounced.ConclusionAlthough the reasons why are not clear, women were often underrepresented among individual physician recognition award recipient lists, particularly for highly prestigious awards.
15
Naime, S., and E. G. Karroum. "0362 Women are Underrepresented in Major US Sleep Societies Recognition Awards." Sleep 43, Supplement_1 (2020): A138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.359.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Introduction Recognition awards are reflective of personal achievement and contribute to professional growth and academic promotion. Underrepresentation of women in recognition awards of various medical societies has been described. The Wayne A. Hening Sleep Medicine Investigator Award of the American Academy of Neurology was only given to two women since 2011. This finding prompted us to further investigate the gender distribution of major recognition awards in national US sleep societies. Methods Publicly available lists of recognition awards recipients were retrieved and analyzed from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) and the Sleep Research Society (SRS) websites. Recognition awards that reflect major contribution to the sleep field were included. The primary outcome measures were the overall proportion of women award recipients across selected recognition awards and the trend over time (1981-2019) analyzed by decade using the Cochran-Armitage test. Results We identified seven major sleep recognition awards (four by the AASM and three by the SRS) with a wide variation in the proportion of awards presented to women (4.8% to 31.3%). There were overall 184 individual awards presented by the two US sleep societies, including 154 (83.7%) awarded for men and 30 (16.3%) awarded for women. The analysis of the awards over time by decade revealed a significant increasing trend (P < 0.0001) in the proportion of awards recognizing women relative to men with a progression from 0.0% in the 1980s, to 3.0% in the 1990s, to 14.3% in the 2000s, and to 27.0% in the 2010s. Conclusion Overall in the last four decades, women have been underrepresented among major recognition awards from the AASM and the SRS, but it is encouraging to see a reduction in the gender gap, particularly over the last ten years. The reasons behind gender inequality in sleep recognition awards are unclear and need further investigation. Support This study was not funded.
16
Hammer, Elizabeth Yost. "2005 Teaching Award Winners." Teaching of Psychology 32, no. 4 (2005): 210–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3204_1.
Full textAbstract:
The Society for the Teaching of Psychology (Division Two) celebrated the 26th year of its annual Teaching Awards Program at the August convention of the American Psychological Association in Washington, D.C. The 2005 winners received a plaque and a check for 750. Recognition for outstanding teaching was given in each of the following categories: (a) Robert S. Daniel Award (4-year college or university professor), (b) 2-year College Award, (c) Moffett Memorial Award (high school teacher), and (d) McKeachie Graduate Student Teaching Excellence Award.
17
Kennett, Wendy. "V. Recognition of Arbitral Awards." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 48, no. 4 (1999): 975–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020589300063831.
Full textAbstract:
A number of issues relating to the finality of arbitration awards in the face of arguments based on public and fraud were addressed by the Court of Appeal in Westacre Investments Inc. v. Jugoimport—SDRP Holding Co. Ltd.20 The claimant had obtained an arbitration award in its favour in Switzerland which it was seeking to enforce in England. The dispute referred to arbitration concerned a claim for payment of commission. The commission was due under a contract through which the claimant assisted the defendant to obtain a contract for the supply of military equipment to Kuwait. It was alleged in the English proceedings that this contract was invalid since the commission payment in fact amounted to a bribe to a member of the Kuwaiti government. The issue of bribery had been raised before the Swiss arbitral tribunal, but the majority of the tribunal found that they were not required to investigate this issue if the parties led no evidence to prove that it had taken place. The contract between the parties was therefore found valid and binding. An appeal to the Swiss Federal Tribunal was lodged by the defendant for an annulment of the arbitral award. The Federal Tribunal concluded that the nature of its competence to review arbitral proceedings required it to base its decision on the facts found by the Tribunal. It therefore confirmed the award. The defendants then tried to raise the same bribery issue in the enforcement proceedings in England.
18
Hasan, Mahamudul, and Md Maqbul Hossain. "Corporate Recognition Award and Reputation Dimensions on Corporate Reputation Consequences." International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management 12, no. 3 (2021): 191–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijabim.20210701.oa12.
Full textAbstract:
The present study aims to investigate the influence of corporate recognition award and corporate reputation dimensions on corporate reputation consequences which are trust, satisfaction, loyalty, and positive word-of-mouth advertisements. Moreover, the study also shows the mediating impact of corporate reputation between corporate recognition award and satisfaction and loyalty. The results of the study show that corporate recognition award and corporate reputation have significant influence on trust, satisfaction, loyalty, and word-of-mouth influence. The corporate recognition dimensions also have a significant influence on corporate reputation consequences except the dimension good employer. The mediating analysis shows that corporate reputation partially mediates between corporate recognition award and satisfaction and loyalty. The results of the study indicate that corporate recognition award and corporate reputation can significantly influence corporate reputation consequences. Moreover, corporate recognition award can make a strong positive impact on consumer perception and response when the reputation of the organization is strong and positive.
19
Pérez-Bernabeu, Begoña. "Article: State Aid Through Arbitration Awards: EU Law as a Ground for Non-enforcement." Intertax 51, Issue 3 (2023): 219–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/taxi2023006.
Full textAbstract:
The relationship between international investment law (IIL) and EU law is not without problems as evidenced by the Achmea ruling. These tensions have become more evident in the Micula case in which the commission resorted to the state aid rules in order to attack arbitration awards arising from intra-EU Bilateral investment treaties (BITs) (deeming its enforcement as state aid). Despite its two rulings relating to the Micula saga, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has not yet validated (or not) the application of state aid rules to the enforcement of intra-EU awards. Hopefully, the upcoming general court’s judgment shall rule on the merits of the Micula case thereby dispelling doubts. Nevertheless, it is foreseeable that further clarifying judgments will be required concerning the recognition and enforcement of intra-EU awards in non-EU jurisdictions. This article reviews the current situation to show that, while state aid rules could adequately prevent the enforcement of an intra-EU award within EU borders, they lack effectiveness for blocking enforcement beyond its borders. Arbitration award, intra-EU BIT, State aid, Tax benefit repeal, Damages, Award recognition, Award enforcement, Public policy, Micula, Achmea, ICSID Convention, New York Convention.
20
Moreau, Richard. "EASL International Recognition Award Recipient 2015." Journal of Hepatology 63, no. 4 (2015): 783–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.06.032.
Full text
21
Fitzmaurice, Kevin. "Lessons from CANDO Recognition Award Winners." Journal of Aboriginal Economic Development 1, no. 1 (1999): 6–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.29173/jaed87.
Full textAbstract:
The Best Practices section focuses on those practices in economic development within Aboriginal communities which are seen as excellent examples of 'best practices,' those activities which produce excellent or outstanding results or that simply make a difference. This section is intended to provide ideas for action. We will attempt to highlight economic development initiatives from across Canada. For this issue, the Best Practices were selected from the 1997 CANDO Recognition Award winners. We felt that as a group that they represent some of the best practices in economic development within the Aboriginal community.
22
Taqwa, Muhamad Dzadit, Amaraduhita Laksmi Prabhaswari, and Maria Jasmine Putri Subiyanto. "Inconsistency in Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: Non-Compliance or Normative Factors?" Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 8, no. 2 (2024): 258–175. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v8i2.1310.
Full textAbstract:
Recognizing and enforcing a foreign arbitral award has been becoming a global issue. To solve such an issue, the New York Convention 1958 turns out to be an important international legal product regarding the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards worldwide. States ratifying the convention are internationally bound to respect and assist in the execution of a foreign arbitration award in their respective countries; Indonesia is one of them. It ratified the convention by Presidential Decree Number 34 of 1981. Nonetheless, there is an impression that Indonesia has not implemented the convention consistently, compared to countries that are, considered, friendly to foreign arbitration awards due to the facts that there are several foreign arbitral awards that have been rejected by the District Court. This impression, however, needs to be re-examined by understanding textually the norm formula in the 1958 New York Convention and comparing its implementation among Indonesia and several countries that are considered friendly to foreign arbitration awards. This paper finds that there is a norm formula in the 1958 New York Convention that opens space for ratification countries not to always recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards in the executing country of the award.
23
Grylls, Bethan. "Finally Receiving Recognition." New Electronics 51, no. 16 (2018): 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/s0047-9624(23)60607-8.
Full text
24
Towell, Elaine. "Silver Scalpel: recognising the trainers." Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 89, no. 6 (2007): 198–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/147363507x207159.
Full textAbstract:
In 2000 a new award was instituted to recognise surgical training. For two years it formed part of the Hospital Doctor awards and in its first year attracted more nominations for a new award than any in previous years, for any discipline. Since then, it has almost single-handedly been carried forward by its creator, David O'Regan, past president of the Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT). The award is presented on an annual basis to the person deemed most worthy of the title of surgical trainer of the year. It is an award, he says, that should be given much wider recognition.
25
Byks-Jazayeri, Christine, Elias Samuels, Elizabeth W. Anderson, and Vicki L. Ellingrod. "Implementing and measuring the impact of a clinical and translational research mentor recognition program." Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2, no. 5 (2018): 312–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.329.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractIntroductionResearch shows incentives can motivate faculty to increase their engagement in mentoring, despite a myriad of institutional barriers. One such incentive may be the implementation of a university-wide mentor award program to promote a culture of mentorship.MethodsA new mentorship award was created at a research-intensive university and faculty recipients were surveyed to assess their perceptions of the award’s impact on their mentoring practices and career.ResultsSixty-two percent of awardees (n=21) completed the survey and felt the recognition incentivized them to engage in further mentoring and participate in formal mentorship training. Most awardees referenced the award in their CVs, performance evaluations, and grant proposals. Additionally, they felt the award effectively promoted mentoring among the broader faculty community.ConclusionGrowth of clinical and translational research depends in part on the mentorship received by early career faculty. Therefore, other research universities may benefit from implementing such awards.
26
Akwagiobe,, Akpanke Richard, Okpoko Mercy, and Otudor Lovina. "Appraisal of Challenges Confronting Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in Nigeria." NEWPORT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT ISSUES IN ARTS AND MANAGEMENT 4, no. 2 (2024): 35–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.59298/nijciam/2024/4.2.73544.
Full textAbstract:
Arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution method often commenced by express agreement of parties in a dispute. Arbitration has become an increasingly preferred method of settling commercial disputes and thought to have advantages over the traditional litigation. However, a problem could emerge where one party to the arbitration is unwilling to comply with the terms of the award. In this case a successful party is left with no option than to use the enforcement machinery of the courts. This paper adopts the doctrinal approach in discussing the issues with the procedure provided for in the various rules of courts for recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards. It also identifies the challenges inherent in the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards. The paper identifies other enforcement machineries outside the courts and concludes that arbitration, if not properly managed may ultimately cause delay in enforcement and become a time wasting method therefore defeating the very essence of opting for arbitration instead of litigation. Keywords: Challenges, Recognition, Enforcement, Arbitral Award
27
Brower, Charles N., and W. Michael Tupman. "Court-Ordered Provisional Measures under the New York Convention." American Journal of International Law 80, no. 1 (1986): 24–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2202482.
Full textAbstract:
In recent years, several courts in the United States have denied requests for pre-award attachments on the ground that such remedies were contrary to the parties’ agreement to arbitrate, and thus to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention or Convention). Despite these decisions, pre-award attachment is an available remedy in certain jurisdictions in the United States. Furthermore, pre-award remedies to secure assets located outside the United States can be obtained through the courts in other countries.
28
Mukhtar, Sohaib, and Shafqat Mahmood Khan Mastoi. "Remedies to Challenge Arbitral Awards in Pakistan." Journal of Asian Research 1, no. 1 (2017): 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.22158/jar.v1n1p14.
Full textAbstract:
<p><em>Available remedies to challenge arbitral awards in Pakistan are modification, remission, annulment and revocation of recognition and enforcement. Arbitration is a method through which disputing parties resolve their disputes outside the Court by avoiding technicalities of procedural law. If there is irregularity regarding process and procedure of arbitral tribunal, parties to an arbitration agreement may apply against it in the Court. Arbitrator files an arbitral award in the Court after completion of arbitral proceedings. If arbitral award is domestic and comes under ambit of Civil Court, arbitrator files arbitral award there but in case of foreign arbitral award, parties to arbitration agreement are required to file arbitral award with arbitration agreement and in case if arbitral award and arbitration agreement are not in official language of Pakistan, translation in official language is required to be submitted before High Court for implementation of arbitral award in Pakistan. Aggrieved party to arbitration agreement may challenge arbitral award before the Court for modification under section 15, for remission under section 16 and for setting aside under section 30 of the Arbitration Act 1940. Recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award may be challenged under article 5 of the New York Convention 1958. The UNCITRAL Model Law 1985 and other relevant International Conventions are not applicable in Pakistan thus aggrieved party may not avail grounds mentioned in these Statutes for modification, remission, setting aside and revocation. Pakistan is an Islamic country hence no award can be implemented in Pakistan if it is against injunctions of Islam under the light of Holy Quran and Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad </em><em>ï·º</em><em> </em><em>which comes under ambit of public policy which is one of the grounds for revocation of recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award in Pakistan. </em></p>
29
Harahap, Panusun. "THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION DECISIONS IN INDONESIA AND SOME FOREIGN COUNTRIES." Yuridika 34, no. 1 (2019): 116. http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v34i1.11402.
Full textAbstract:
An international arbitration award handed down in a territory of a given country may be applied for in another territory, provided that it is a party to the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Implementation of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and between those countries there are bilateral or multilateral agreements on the recognition and execution of international arbitration decisions. An arbitral award, as well as a judge's verdict may actually be voluntary by the loser or debtor. If the verdict has been executed in good faith by the losing party, or in other words his accomplishments have been met with good faith, then the problem is solved. It is not uncommon, however, that although the verdict is already in place, the losing party does not want to execute the verdict voluntarily. In this case the winning party or the creditor may submit an application to the Chairman of the Central Jakarta District Court for the international arbitration award to be executed by force (execution forcee).
30
Ramazanzade, M. V. "On Some Aspects Of Recognition And Enforcement Of Icsid Awards In The Republic Of Azerbaijan." Ірпінський юридичний часопис, no. 2(4) (April 5, 2021): 135–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.33244/2617-4154.2(4).2020.135-143.
Full textAbstract:
The current paper analyzes recognition and enforcement procedure of ICSID Awards, namely matters of immunity from jurisdiction and immunity from recognition under legal framework established by the ICSID Convention. As such, Article 55 of the ICSID Convention regards national laws on state immunity which results in implications in enforcement of ICSID Awards. To be more precise, based on, inter alia, this provision the states have developed national rules governing application of state immunity which in absence of unified rules and practice may result in inability of winning investor to enforce the ICSID Award due to nature of property located in a state where investment is sought. Accordingly, there has been attempts to mitigate this risk by developing contractual tools for waiving sovereign immunity in case of enforcement of arbitrary award. With that said, the current paper highlights existing problems in enforcement of ICSID Awards deriving from doctrine of sovereign immunity and proceeds with analysis of the abovementioned tools as well as applicable national legislation of the Republic of Azerbaijan in order to identify provisions governing recognition and enforcement of ICSID Awards as well as those addressing the matter of sovereign immunity.
31
Drury, John. "Mid-Career Award." Social Psychological Review 21, no. 2 (2019): 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.53841/bpsspr.2019.21.2.9.
Full textAbstract:
The BPS Social Psychology Section Mid-Career Award is given in recognition of outstanding research in social psychology by a mid-career scholar. Recipients may be of any nationality but must currently be working in a UK institution. Mid-career is defined loosely and might typically apply to scholars awarded their doctorate between 5 and 20 years ago.
32
Williams, Amanda. "Early Career Award." Social Psychological Review 20, no. 2 (2018): 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.53841/bpsspr.2018.20.2.8.
Full textAbstract:
The BPS Social Psychology Section Early Career Award is given in recognition of outstanding research in social psychology by an early-career scholar and is determined by the submission of a single published paper that has stemmed from the nominee’s PhD. The recipient of the Award will receive a prize and be invited to give a talk at the 2018 Section workshop.
33
Reimer, Nils Karl. "Early Career Award." Social Psychological Review 21, no. 2 (2019): 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.53841/bpsspr.2019.21.2.8.
Full textAbstract:
The BPS Social Psychology Section Early Career Award is given in recognition of outstanding research in social psychology by an early-career scholar and is determined by the submission of a single published paper that has stemmed from the nominee’s PhD. The recipient of the Award will receive a prize and be invited to give a talk at the 2019 Social Psychology Secction conference.
34
Morey-Pedersen, Janice. "Peer recognition award for outstanding employee contributions." AORN Journal 61, no. 1 (1995): 263–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2092(06)63875-1.
Full text
35
"Special recognition award." Nursing Standard 12, no. 51 (1998): 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns.12.51.63.s62.
Full text
36
"Special Recognition Award." Nursing Standard 11, no. 50 (1997): 37. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns.11.50.37.s46.
Full text
37
"Special Recognition Award." Journal of Public Health Dentistry 50, no. 3 (1990): 206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.1990.tb02123.x.
Full text
38
Bork, Stephanie, and Kiersten LeBar. "The implementation and impact of an advanced practice recognition program." Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, December 21, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/jxx.0000000000000979.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT Meaningful job recognition is a pillar for sustaining healthy work environments and proven beneficial for job satisfaction and retention. However, few dedicated award recognition programs exist for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), and no available literature evaluates the impact on professional practice, sense of belonging, and job retention or satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to introduce a novel award recognition program for APRNs and physician associates (PAs) in a large academic medical system and evaluate it's impact on job satisfaction, retention, and sense of belonging. Five awards were created to recognize areas of achievement for clinically practicing APRNs or PAs within an academic health system. Nomination letters were collected, deidentified, and reviewed by an award committee. Winners were announced and received a plaque. A survey was sent to employed APRNs evaluating their response to the program. The survey was sent to both APRNs (83%) and PAs (17%). Survey end points included job satisfaction, willingness to stay in role for 1 and 5 years, sense of community, something to work toward, and increasing recognition of APRNs. Results showed statistical significance in three areas. Advanced practice registered nurses or PAs who were aware of award opportunities and/or nominated for an award showed higher job satisfaction, more likely to stay in job for 1 year, and felt a greater level of recognition. Dedicated APRN award programs may have a positive impact on job satisfaction and retention. This model may be extrapolated to provide greater opportunities for meaningful recognition among clinical APRNs.
39
Zambare, Wini V., Lindsay Sobin, Anna Messner, Jessica R. Levi, Jeremiah C. Tracy, and Lauren F. Tracy. "Gender Representation in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Recognition Awards." Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, November 10, 2020, 019459982097095. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599820970958.
Full textAbstract:
Objective The proportion of women in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery (OHNS) has steadily increased in recent years. This study examines gender representation in recognition awards given by OHNS societies between 2009 and 2019. Study Design Retrospective analysis of recognition awards given by 10 OHNS societies between 2009 and 2019. Setting Retrospective review of web-based, public records. Methods Data from 19 awards were analyzed for recipient gender ratio, society, subspecialty, award type (research, achievement, or humanitarian), and change over time. Results Of 184 awards given by societies in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery, 59 (28%) were given to women. Women received 49 (28%) research awards, 9 (31%) humanitarian awards, and 1 (2.8%) achievement award. Women represented 31% of award winners in rhinology/skull base, 30% of award winners in head and neck surgery, 8% in neurotology, and 6% in facial plastic surgery. The American Head and Neck Society Prevention and Early Detection award had the highest representation of women at 43%. Some awards had no female awardees over the past decade. No temporal trends were observed. Conclusion From 2009 to 2019, women received recognition awards at a higher percentage than overall gender representation in OHNS. Comparison of research, humanitarian, and achievement awards revealed the disparity of women receiving fewer achievement awards relative to men. Gender representation of award recipients varied by subspecialty, which may be partially determined by gender distribution within the fields.
40
"PRESIDENT'S SPECIAL RECOGNITION AWARD." Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 56, no. 2 (2007): 207–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.56.2.207.
Full text
41
"PRESIDENT'S SPECIAL RECOGNITION AWARD." Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 57, no. 1 (2009): 105–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.57.1.105.
Full text
42
"PRESIDENT'S SPECIAL RECOGNITION AWARD." Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 58, no. 1 (2010): 83. http://dx.doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.58.1.83.
Full text
43
Kraybill, Jess, Seungyeon Lee, Fanli Jia, and Leslie Berntsen. "2023 Society for Teaching of Psychology Awards and Recognition Recipients." Teaching of Psychology, July 24, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00986283231184414.
Full textAbstract:
This year marks the forty-fourth year of STP's annual Excellence in Teaching Awards Program, the fourth year of both its Civic Engagement Award and its Mentorship of Teachers Award, and the third year of its Promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Award. Each 2023 recipient was selected by a different panel1 and received a plaque and a check for US $1,500 at the Annual Conference on Teaching (ACT) in Pittsburg, PA. We sincerely appreciate all nominators, nominees, and reviewers for their participation in the awards process.
44
Bastola, Rajesh. "The Juridical Canvas of Recognizing and Enforcing Arbitral Awards: A Deconstruction of Legal Frameworks and Contemporary Practices in Nepal." Kathmandu School of Law Review, July 26, 2024, 154–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.46985/kslr.v12i1.2228.
Full textAbstract:
Arbitration is one of the methods of dispute resolution mechanisms where disputes are resolved outside the formal court structure by persons appointed by the disputing parties. The person so appointed renders an order generally known as an award which is binding to the parties to the dispute. In other words, it is considered one of the alternative dispute resolution methods. The importance of any legal proceedings is not limited to the rendering judgment or award. Rather the crux of any proceeding depends on the recognition and enforcement of award as well. Arbitration as a process of dispute resolution mechanism depends on the competency of the process to render the award. The mere rendering of the award does not suffice the fundamental objectives of justice. Rather the recognition and enforcement of the award is the fundamental requirement to uphold the sanctity, effectiveness and efficiency of any arbitration proceeding. Against the backdrop, the paper aims to critically examine the existing legal provisions for the recognition and enforcement of awards as well as the judicial discourse is examined via the examination of the judgment of the Supreme Court’s recent trends in the recognition and enforcement of awards. Lastly, this paper presents the way out for the future but based on the best practices around the world.
45
"Infrastructure Services Luxembourg S.à.r.l. and Energia Termosolar BV v. Kingdom of Spain." International Law Reports 208 (2024): 624–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/ilr.2024.40.
Full textAbstract:
624Arbitration — Arbitration award — International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes — International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, 1965 (“ICSID Convention”) — Article 54 — Meaning of prior written agreement — Arbitration (International Investment Disputes) Act 1966 — Recognition and enforcement of award — State Immunity Act 1978 — Section 9 — Exceptions to sovereign immunity — Enforcement of international arbitration award — Whether Spain having sovereign immunity for proceedings to enforce international arbitral awards — Whether Spain’s accession to the ICSID Convention constituting a submission to jurisdiction of United Kingdom CourtsRelationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes — International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, 1965 — Arbitration (International Investment Disputes) Act 1966 — State Immunity Act 1978 — Whether Spain entitled to plead foreign State immunity — Whether Spain could challenge arbitral award within United Kingdom courts — Jurisdiction of United Kingdom courts with respect to enforcement and recognition of international arbitral awards granted under ICSID Convention — Relationship between European Union law and international lawTreaties — Interpretation — International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes — International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, 1965 — Articles 54 and 55 — Meaning of prior written agreement — Meaning of recognition and enforcement of arbitral award — Whether ICSID Convention excluding any claim for foreign State immunity in proceedings for recognition and enforcement of an arbitral awardState immunity — State Immunity Act 1978 — Exceptions to immunity — Exception based on prior written agreement by State — Exception to immunity in matters of enforcement of arbitral awards — International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes — International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, 1965 — Relationship between ICSID Convention 625and enforcement and recognition of arbitral awards by domestic courtsJurisdiction — Whether Spain could challenge arbitral award within United Kingdom courts — Jurisdiction of United Kingdom courts with respect to enforcement and recognition of international arbitral awards granted under international Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, 1965 — Role and powers of United Kingdom courts in recognizing and enforcing arbitral awards — The law of England
46
NAHNYBIDA, Volodymyr. "The Influence of the Law of the Country of the Place of Enforcement of the Arbitral Award on the Settlement of Disputes in the International Commercial Arbitration." University Scientific Notes, February 25, 2020, 86–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.37491/unz.73.8.
Full textAbstract:
The article examines the key aspects of the impact of the law of the place of enforcement of the arbitral award on arbitration and directly on the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, given the study of doctrinal positions, regulations and relevant case law. It was found out that the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958 refers to the procedural rules of the country of enforcement to settle matters inherent to the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards not governed by the Convention, establishing only basic and fairly simple formal requirements for the said procedure, which is one of the strong characteristics of the conventional regime of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards. In light of this, it is concluded that such an approach is moderate and takes into account the impossibility and lack of practical necessity of unification at the international treaty level of procedural features of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, establishing only basic principles and requirements. It is substantiated that there are two components of the law of the place of enforcement of the arbitral award, which regulate the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards within the relevant jurisdiction, namely substantive and procedural, which, however, are contained in single legal acts — mostly national arbitration laws. The author emphasizes the crucial role of the law of the place of enforcement of the arbitral award in the material and procedural aspects for the procedure of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards within the relevant jurisdiction. It is concluded that the unification of material grounds for refusal of recognition and enforcement (in particular, non-arbitrability of the subject matter of the dispute and contradiction of the award to public policy as grounds that can be raised by the competent judicial authority at the place of enforcement ex officio, regardless of reference to them by opposing party), as well as the consolidation of basic procedural requirements and principles is carried out by the New York Convention of 1958, which leaves to the discretion of the national legislature, on the one hand, the settlement of minor aspects of the procedure, but, on the other hand, recognizes its full discretion in determining the limits of objective arbitrability, the content and specific filling of the category of international public policy applicable in the relevant jurisdiction. Keywords: arbitral award, international commercial arbitration, applicable law, arbitration process, public policy.
47
NAHNYBIDA, Volodymyr. "The Influence of the Law of the Country of the Place of Enforcement of the Arbitral Award on the Settlement of Disputes in the International Commercial Arbitration." University Scientific Notes, February 25, 2020, 86–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.37491/unz.73.8.
Full textAbstract:
The article examines the key aspects of the impact of the law of the place of enforcement of the arbitral award on arbitration and directly on the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, given the study of doctrinal positions, regulations and relevant case law. It was found out that the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958 refers to the procedural rules of the country of enforcement to settle matters inherent to the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards not governed by the Convention, establishing only basic and fairly simple formal requirements for the said procedure, which is one of the strong characteristics of the conventional regime of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards. In light of this, it is concluded that such an approach is moderate and takes into account the impossibility and lack of practical necessity of unification at the international treaty level of procedural features of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, establishing only basic principles and requirements. It is substantiated that there are two components of the law of the place of enforcement of the arbitral award, which regulate the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards within the relevant jurisdiction, namely substantive and procedural, which, however, are contained in single legal acts — mostly national arbitration laws. The author emphasizes the crucial role of the law of the place of enforcement of the arbitral award in the material and procedural aspects for the procedure of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards within the relevant jurisdiction. It is concluded that the unification of material grounds for refusal of recognition and enforcement (in particular, non-arbitrability of the subject matter of the dispute and contradiction of the award to public policy as grounds that can be raised by the competent judicial authority at the place of enforcement ex officio, regardless of reference to them by opposing party), as well as the consolidation of basic procedural requirements and principles is carried out by the New York Convention of 1958, which leaves to the discretion of the national legislature, on the one hand, the settlement of minor aspects of the procedure, but, on the other hand, recognizes its full discretion in determining the limits of objective arbitrability, the content and specific filling of the category of international public policy applicable in the relevant jurisdiction. Keywords: arbitral award, international commercial arbitration, applicable law, arbitration process, public policy.
48
"UAAC/AAUC Recognition Award and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020." RACAR : Revue d'art canadienne 46, no. 1 (2021): 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1078063ar.
Full text
49
"UAAC/AAUC Recognition Award and Lifetime Achievement Award 2019." RACAR : Revue d'art canadienne 45, no. 1 (2020): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1070575ar.
Full text
50
"UAAC-AAUC Recognition Award 2018." RACAR : Revue d'art canadienne 44, no. 1 (2019): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1062147ar.
Full text