Academic literature on the topic 'B 20.5 UL 2010 C843'

Abstract Background: There is evidence of a leukemogenic effect of purine analogues, mainly when combined with DNA-damaging agents. Various series report an approximately 5% rate of t-MDS/AML in patients treated with a fludarabine-based regimen. Patients are generally old, and old age is associated with worse outcomes. To date, there is no established standard therapy recommendation for this group of patients, and results of prospective treatment evaluations are scarce. Aim: To determine the characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with CLL and t-MDS/AML. Methods: We analyzed a group of 6 patients with newly diagnosed t-MDS/AML who were treated in our institution from September 2011 to July 2014. Patients were enrolled in a phase II trial of azacitidine (75 mg/m2 IV daily x 5 days) in combination with vorinostat (200 mg orally three times daily x 5 days) (Arm A) or azacitidine alone (Arm B), with courses repeated every 3-8 weeks. This trial was designed to uniformly treat patients not eligible for other leukemia protocols due to comorbidities. Results: At baseline, all patients had an underlying diagnosis of CLL that was in remission or minimally active. The median percentage of CLL bone marrow involvement was 10% (range 0-60%), and ALC was 0.9 K/uL (range 0.2-9.79). The median number of prior CLL treatments was 2 (range 0-3). All patients had previously received fludarabine-based regimens. The median time from chemotherapy to t-MDS/AML diagnosis was 10 years (range 4-10). All patients were male, and the median age was 72 years (range 52-72). All patients had 3-line cytopenia, with median WBC 2.3 K/uL (range 0.8-8.9), ANC 0.55 K/uL (range 0-1.22), hemoglobin 9.6 G/DL (range 8.3-10.4), platelets 39 K/uL (range 6-80), and bone marrow blast percentage of 5% (range 1-18%). The karyotype was complex in all patients. Molecular studies showed that 3 patients had TP53 gene mutations. Five patients received treatment in Arm A, and only 1 patient was randomized to Arm B. Patients received a median of 4 cycles (range 2-7) and remained in the study for a median time of 216 days (range 86-329) before progression. None of the patients achieved remission, but stable disease was observed in 5 out of 6 patients. At the time of this analysis, 4 patients are dead and 2 are still alive: one discontinued treatment because of prolonged myelosuppression and is receiving best supportive care, and the other is recovering from cycle number 4 of treatment. The median survival in the group from the time of treatment initiation was 10.1 months and from the time of study discontinuation was 3.1 months. Further therapy was attempted in 3 patients without response. Conclusion: This is a group of patients with poor prognostic features. Azacytidine and vorinostat have been previously reported to be a safe combination (Garcia-Manero et al. ASH 2010, abstract 604) and may constitute a reasonable treatment alternative. Further prospective studies involving larger numbers of patients are required. Abstract 5627. Table 1: Baseline Patient Characteristics. Patient Age WBC K/uL Hb G/DL Plt K/uL BM Blast % CLL BM % Cytogenetic Molecular Prior CLL Treatments Treatment Arm Best Response 1 52 11 9.6 6 18 60 -3,-4,-5q,-6,-7, -7p,-12, +16 TP53 mutation 1.FCR x 62. Rituximab + Lenalidomide A NR 2 74 1 10 41 3 10 -3p,-5q,-7,-15,-17,-19 TP53 mutation 1. FCR x 42. FCR x 53. BR x 2 A SD 3 68 2.2 9.4 27 6 30 +7,-7p,t(7,21) Negative 1. FCR x 62. FCR x 4 B SD 4 73 2.3 9.7 39 6 0 +2,-5q,+8,-17,-18,+19,+20,-Y Negative 1. FCR x 6 A SD 5 71 0.8 8.3 39 4 0 +2,+4,t(5;17),+6,-7,-9, +13, +15,-16,-17,+18,+19,-20,+21 Negative 1. FR x 12. BR x43. MEDI-551 A SD 6 74 2.4 10.4 80 1 10 t(1;3),inv3,-5q,-18 TP53 mutation 1. R-CHOP x 62. BR x 13. FCR x 4 A SD WBC: White blood cells, Hb: hemoglobin, Plt: Platelets, BM: Bone Marrow, CLL: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, F: Fludarabine, C: Cyclophosphamide, R: Rituximab, B: Bendamustine, MEDI-551: anti-CD19 antibody, NR: no response, SD: stable disease. Disclosures O'Brien: Amgen, Celgene, GSK: Consultancy; CLL Global Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent, Genentech, Gilead, Infinity, Pharmacyclics, Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys, Acerta, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Kantarjian:ARIAD, Pfizer, Amgen: Research Funding.

Background: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis [HLH], is a rare life-threatening syndrome of excessive immune activation. It can be primary due to genetic predisposition or secondary due to infections, immune disorders or malignancies. With nonspecific clinical presentation, a high index of suspicion is required to make the diagnosis. Prompt treatment of underlying etiology and HLH specific therapy is warranted to prevent adverse clinical outcome. Methods: After IRB approval, we conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients (pts) ≥ 18 years diagnosed with HLH between January 1st, 2010 and June 30th, 2019. We recorded age at diagnosis, gender, cause of HLH, symptoms, laboratory testing, bone marrow pathology, imaging, treatment and outcome. Results: We found a total of 15 patients in the time interval. Pt age ranged from 22 to 64 years with a median of 46 years. 60% were females and 40% were males. 14 pts had secondary HLH and one pt tested positive for HLH gene mutations. Etiology of HLH was malignancy in 6 (40%), infection in 5 (33%), rheumatological disease in 3 (20%) and cause was unclear in one pt but suspected to be an infection. One pt had prior allogenic stem cell transplant and one pt developed HLH even after completion of treatment for lymphoma. On presentation, 14 (93%) had fever, 6 (40%) had respiratory symptoms, 6 (40%) had neurological symptoms, 2 (13%) had a skin rash, 2 (13%) had bleeding manifestations and 3 (20%) required pressor support. Hemoglobin ranged from 5.5 to 13.3 g/dL on presentation, with median of 10.1 g/dL and 14 (93%) had Hb <9 g/dL. Absolute neutrophil count ranged from 0.3 to 16.94 x 103/uL with median of 2.87x103/uL and decreased to < 1000x103/uL in 11 (73%) and < 500x103/uL in 7 (46%). Platelet counts on presentation ranged from 18 to 244x103/uL with median of 82x103/uL and decreased to <100x103/uL in 14 (93%) and <20x103/uL in 8 (53%). 14 (93%) had bicytopenia. Initial ferritin levels ranged from 1,552 to 2,62,080 ng/ml with median of 5,515 ng/ml and increased to >10,000 ng/ml in 10 (66%) and highest level was 4,57,970 ng/ml. All 15 pts had some degree of hepatic dysfunction and one pt had acute kidney injury. Triglyceride levels were >265 mg/dL in 6 (40%). 10 (66%) had laboratory evidence of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), one pt had clinical DIC. Blood cultures were negative in everyone, except 2 pts who developed infection during the hospital course, one with Candida krusei and the other with methicillin sensitive staphylococcus aureus. Bone marrow biopsy was performed in 14 (93%) and all of them demonstrated hemophagocytosis. 3 (20%) underwent lumbar puncture and 2 had elevated CSF protein. 11 (73%) had immunological testing and all of them had elevated soluble IL-2 receptor alpha (sCD25 or sIL-2R). Of the 3 pts who had HLH genetic testing, one had HLH associated mutations. Organomegaly was noted in 11 (73.3%) (4 had hepatosplenomegaly, 6 had splenomegaly, one had hepatomegaly). 6 (40%) had lung infiltrates. MRI brain was done in 5 (33%) and 2 had patchy hyperintensities. 11 (73.3%) were treated with HLH-94 protocol with etoposide and dexamethasone. One pt had matched unrelated donor Allogenic stem cell transplant. 13 (86.6%) had initial recovery. At the time of data cut off, 10 (66%) were alive. Of the 3 pts who initially recovered, one pt died of relapsed lymphoma, one died of HLH relapse and one developed Clostridium difficile infection with bowel perforation. [Refer to Table 1]. Conclusion: Even though literature suggests that malignancy associated HLH has a worse prognosis, our small series did not suggest that. We also noted that HLH associated with rheumatological diseases leads to a superior outcome if the underlying disease is adequately treated. The most significant finding in our series was a patient with diffuse large B cell lymphoma who was diagnosed to have primary HLH with HLH associated mutations. Typically, primary HLH presents in the first few years of life. This patient case points to the fact that patients with primary HLH can have a late presentation and can also be associated with immunological disorders with a predisposition to malignancy. This finding suggests that all patients diagnosed with HLH should have genetic testing done for HLH associated mutations, as this will impact treatment decisions and these patients will benefit from more intense treatment which may include an allogenic stem cell transplant. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 2176 Recent advances in frontline therapy for newly diagnosed AML include increased dose of anthracycline during induction, multi-agent regimens, high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) as consolidation for core binding factor (CBF) patients (pts), and allogeneic transplantation (alloHCT) during 1st remission for poor risk pts. Prolonged low-dose cytotoxic maintenance therapy does not appear to improve clinical outcomes, but investigation of novel maintenance strategies remains appealing, affording pts an opportunity to receive new therapies without increasing the considerable toxicities of induction/ consolidation. The CALGB performed a phase II study of induction and risk-adapted consolidation, followed by one year of maintenance therapy with decitabine, for newly diagnosed AML pts <60 years of age (CALGB 10503). Induction was daunorubicin 90 mg/m2 for 3 days, etoposide 100 mg/m2 for 3 days, and cytarabine 100 mg/m2 for 7 days (3+3+7). Reinduction (2+2+5) was given for residual disease on day 14. CBF pts in CR received 3 cycles of HiDAC; all other pts received autologous transplantation (autoHCT) if eligible, or HiDAC if not. Poor risk pts in 1st CR received alloHCT off study, when appropriate. Maintenance decitabine (20mg/m2 intravenously for 4–5 days, every 6 weeks for 8 cycles) began within 60–90 days after consolidation for pts with neutrophil ≥1000/uL and platelets ≥75,000/uL. Clinical results for the efficacy of decitabine maintenance for one year are not yet mature; the study closed to accrual July 30, 2010. In a previous study for a slightly more favorable patient cohort that was treated with identical induction and consolidation (CALGB 19808), 29% of all enrolled pts (214/732) and 39% of CR pts were registered to a randomized investigational maintenance therapy. To examine the feasibility of conducting a subsequent randomized trial of maintenance therapy, we analyzed reasons for study discontinuation for all pts enrolled on CALGB 10503; 473 pts had “response” or “off study” data forms submitted, to date. Complete remission* (CR) was achieved in 349 (74%). Reasons for induction failure were primary refractory AML (15%), induction death (5%), and other (6%, including those withdrawn from protocol for alternative therapy presumably due to persistent disease). The most common reason for not receiving maintenance therapy was the presence of AML, either primary refractory as noted or early relapse (7% of CR pts). In pts who achieved CR, the most common reason for not receiving maintenance was removal from the protocol for alloHCT (71/349, 20%). 9% refused further protocol therapy after consolidation, perhaps from “treatment fatigue.” Correlative investigations for CALGB 10503 are ongoing, including identification of novel prognostic markers, targets for treatment, and markers of minimal residual disease. Clearly, clinical investigation of maintenance therapy as part of a comprehensive treatment approach for frontline therapy of AML (inclusive of homogeneous induction and consolidation therapy) requires considerable up-front enrollment in order to reach maintenance accrual goals. Randomized maintenance studies will likely need intergroup participation for timely completion. However, we conclude that the benefits of up-front enrollment (relative to a post-consolidation enrollment strategy) outweigh the accrual burdens. Benefits include uniform pre-maintenance therapy and the potential for novel discovery from correlative studies. Study designs for future maintenance trials for AML in 1st CR must balance expediency with the more comprehensive approach employed in CALGB 10503. Disclosures: Blum: Celgene: Research Funding. Off Label Use: decitabine in AML. DeAngelo: Deminimus: Consultancy.

Abstract Background: Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) in resource-poor countries face major challenges including treatment abandonment and poor overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). To address these issues, in 2002 a non-profit pediatric hematology-oncology center was established in a tertiary medical institution in Kerala, India to provide high-quality treatment and supportive care at low cost. A standardized approach to pediatric leukemia care began in 2010. We present evidence that outcomes on par with that seen in resource-rich nations can be achieved with a rigorous treatment and supportive care approach. Methods: Following IRB approval, we reviewed clinical information and outcomes of all patients above 1 year and less than 14 years of age treated for newly diagnosed B- or T-ALL between January 1, 2010 and January 31, 2015. Seventy-six children were consecutively treated and all are included in this analysis. B-ALL patient treatment was stratified according to BFM relapse risk criteria with standard risk (SR) defined by age 1-6 yrs, peripheral WBC < 20 X 106/ul, good prednisolone response, absence of t(9:22) and t(4:11), and a day 33 marrow in remission by morphology. At any age, poor prednisolone response, t(9:22) or t(4:11), or day 33 marrow not in remission defined high risk (HR), and patients not meeting SR or HR criteria were intermediate risk (IR). Minimal residual disease assessment (MRD) was not utilized in risk stratification or treatment decisions. All patients were treated as per BFM 2002 with modifications. All patients received 4-drug (Vincristine/ Daunorubicin/ L Asparaginase/ Prednisolone) induction and Phase 2 induction of cyclophosphamide, cytosine arabinoside, and daily 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), followed by consolidation with oral 6-MP and IV methotrexate (MTX), 2 gm/m2 x 4 for SR and IR B-ALL and 5 gm/m2 x 4 for HR B-ALL, T-ALL, and CNS disease. Phase 1 reinduction utilized adriamycin and dexamethasone. The Phase 2 reinduction regimen closely mirrored Phase 2 induction. HR B-ALL and T-ALL patients received 12 Gy prophylactic cranial irradiation, and those with CNS disease 18 Gy. Maintenance therapy consisted of daily oral 6-MP, weekly oral MTX, and monthly IV Vincristine and oral Dexamethasone for 104 weeks. Prophylactic intrathecal MTX was given 11 times through reinduction and every 3 months in maintenance. Febrile neutropenia protocols were enforced to ensure less than 30 minutes elapsed from presentation with fever > 38o C to initiation of broad spectrum antibiotics. To minimize sepsis risk, prophylactic GCSF was given between cycles to target ANC > 0.5 x 106/uL. OS and EFS were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method. Patients were censored at last follow-up. Abandonment was treated as an event in calculating EFS. Kuppuswami Socioeconomic Scale (KES) was applied using phone interviews of guardians. Results: Median follow-up time was 30.3 months (range, 1.9-61 months). One patient (1.3%) died during induction, 1 was censored at loss to follow-up upon transfer of treatment to another center, none abandoned treatment, and 6 (7.9%) relapsed, with 1 (1.3%) relapse within 90 days of diagnosis. At median follow-up, the OS was 93.4% and EFS 90.8% (95% CI, 81.1%-99.1%). SR accounted for 28 (36.8%), IR for 36 (47.4%), and HR for 11 (14.5%) patients. OS by risk stratification is shown in Figure 1. KES analysis on the 65 contactable families revealed a median family income between Indian Rs. 14,000-37,000 (US $218-577)/month, and 14 (21.5%) having income less than Rs. 9,300 (US $145)/month. Thirty (46.1%) stratified as lower-middle class or lower. The primary wage earner had less than a high school education in 21 (32.3%), and was at a clerical or lower work level in 46 (70.8%) of families. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that, for pediatric ALL, results similar to resource-rich countries can be provided in resource-poor areas through a tertiary care center maintaining adherence to globally accepted guidelines for treatment and management of treatment-associated complications. We plan to report minimum 5-year follow-up for all patients in future. Future prospective studies will examine the role of MRD-based stratification and allogeneic transplant options for high-risk patients, as well as seek to extend the low rates of toxic death and abandonment to neighboring centers by implementation of best practices throughout the region. Figure 1. OS by Risk Stratification Figure 1. OS by Risk Stratification Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Introduction: Currently, there is no consensus regarding diagnosis and treatment of occult lymphomatous menigeal involvement of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with systemic non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), especially in patients with minimal number of clonal cells detected by flow cytometry (FCM) or by cytology. Aim of the study: To describe a cohort of patients with occult lymphomatous involvement in cerebrospinal fluid including the diagnostic methods as well as management. Patients and methods: CSF at diagnosis of B-NHL was examined by FCM, cytology, biochemistry and microRNA analysis in a cohort of 62 patients (systemic DLBCL N=45, MCL N=15, Burkitt lymphoma N=2) between 2010 and 2013. Occult meningeal involvement was defined by: a/ FCM: absolute positive number of clonal cells <20 and concomitant negative finding by cytology; b/ FCM negative for clonal cells and concomitant positive finding by cytology; c/ by abundance of increased levels (≥ 200% of the threshold levels) of oncogenic microRNAs (members of miR-17-92 cluster and miR-21, evaulated by Taq-Man RT PCR) in cerebrospinal fluid in patients either passing a/ or b/. The threshold of individual microRNA abundance was defined by statistical analysis of patients with or without CNS involvement. The patients qualified for occult meningeal involvement were considered to be at high risk of CNS relaps. As a control group, the patients with elevated oncogenic microRNAs and negative FCM or cytology of CSF (N=10), were used. All patients received some form of CNS prophylaxis as a part of standard first line treatment. Results and conclusions: According to described criteria we identified 8 patients with occult meningeal involvement at diagnosis (systemic DLBCL N=4, MCL N=3, Burkitt lymphoma N=1) out of 62 patients: 3 with negative FCM and positive cytology (2-14 cells/ul); and 5 with positive FCM <20 clonal cells and negative cytology, 3 out of them with positive microRNAs. None of these patients with occult meningeal involvement relapsed/progressed into CNS within 12 months. In contrast three out of ten control patients (characterized by elevated oncogenic microRNAs in CSF, but negative for FCM and cytology) relapsed to CNS within 6 months after diagnosis. None of ”triple” negative (FCM, cytology, microRNA) patients (N=44) developed clinically manifest CNS involvement. These results suggest that examination of oncogenic microRNA in CSF at diagnosis is more sensitive method than FCM and cytology of CSF to detect the patients with occult CNS involvement and higher risk of CNS involvement and this should be reflected in treatment strategy in further clinical trials. Grants: GACR305 13-12449P, UNCE204021, PRVOUK: P24/LF1/3, P27/LF1/1, P 27/2012 LF3 Disclosures Spacek: Roche: Consultancy, Travel grants Other.

Abstract Abstract 2594 The treatment of adult acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) is challenging. Traditional induction regimens have incorporated vincristine, anthracycline, asparaginase, and steroids that result in high rates of complete remission (CR). However, less than half of pts in CR will be cured. To improve results, high dose cytarabine (HIDAC) has been increasingly incorporated into post-remission therapy. Since HIDAC is often used to treat relapsed ALL, we hypothesized that the prior use of HIDAC would reduce the CR rate when it is applied to pts at the time of their first relapse. Methods: Consecutive pts with ALL in first relapse treated with HIDAC-containing regimens either at the Cleveland Clinic (CC) between the years 1993–2010 or at any institution participating in SWOG trial S9030 (HIDAC 3000 mg/m2 Days 1–5, mitoxantrone 80 mg/m2 Day 1) (1992–1993) were included. HIDAC was defined as a cycle of at least 3000 mg/m2 × 5 days. Remission was defined according to standard criteria. The outcome analysis [CR and overall survival (OS)] was adjusted for the following factors: age, WBC at diagnosis, cytogenetic (CG) risk, immunophenotype, transplant, and prior HIDAC exposure. Results: Sixty-six pts were included (39 treated at CC, and 27 as part of SWOG protocol S9030). All pts received a vincristine/prednisone/anthracycline/steroid-based induction regimen (S8417, CALGB 19802, CALGB 8811) except for 1 pt who was treated with hyperCVAD. Seventeen pts treated at CC had HIDAC incorporated into their initial treatment (1: hyperCVAD; 16: CALGB 19802), but none of the SWOG pts did. The median age was 35 yrs (range 17 to 73). The median WBC at the time of diagnosis for CC pts was 21.4 K/uL (range 0.5–260.0) and median WBC at the time of study registration for SWOG patients was 17.6 K/uL (range 0.4–198.4). Three pts (5%) had a mixed (B/T) lineage leukemia. Three patients had lymphoblastic lymphoma (1 B-cell; 2 T-cell) at the time of initial diagnosis, and had ALL at the time of relapse. For the 39 CC pts, the median time from diagnosis to relapse was 12 mos (range 1–55 mos). CG risk was ascribed by CALGB criteria. Of the 50 pts with evaluable pre-study CG, 20 pts (40%) had normal CG, 18 (36%) miscellaneous, and 12 (24%) poor risk CG. Twenty pts (30%) received HIDAC alone, and 46 (70%) received HIDAC in combination with other drugs for relapsed ALL. The CR rate for all relapsed pts was 32% (CC 36% and SWOG 26%) and was not affected by the addition of other drugs to HIDAC. Twenty-nine patients (44%) were able to proceed to HSCT; and the median OS was 5.4 mos (95% CI: 4.8–6.0 mos). After adjusting for all baseline and demographic factors, the CR rate and OS between pts receiving or not receiving HIDAC during initial treatment was not significantly different. Five of 17 (29%: 95% CI 10%-56%) pts with prior exposure to HIDAC achieved CR while 16 of 49 (33%: 95% CI 20%-48%) pts without prior HIDAC exposure achieved a CR (p=0.80). The 1 year OS (from salvage) for pts treated with HIDAC for relapse who also were treated with prior HIDAC was 12% (95% CI: 0%-27%) and for pts not treated with prior HIDAC was 33% (95% CI: 20%-46%)(p=0.17). Since additional information was available on the CC pts, additional analyses were performed on this subgroup of pts. With the exception of lymphoblastic lymphoma at the time of diagnosis, no other factors correlated with achievement of CR. Achievement of CR was the only factor associated with proceeding to HSCT (79% vs. 36%, p=0.01). Variables associated with improved OS included: lymphoblastic lymphoma at the time of diagnosis (p=0.04; 2 of the 3 pts are still being followed at 80+ and 96+ mos), achievement of CR (p=0.0001), longer remission (> 30 mos, p=0.005), and transplantation (p=0.0001). Conclusion: The outcome of relapsed ALL with HIDAC salvage therapy is dismal, regardless of prior HIDAC exposure; and novel treatments are needed. There was a suggestion that the OS of pts with prior HIDAC exposure may be lower, but further study of 1 year OS with larger pt numbers will be needed to evaluate this. An interesting finding in this study was the favorable outcome of pts with lymphoblastic lymphoma at diagnosis, who subsequently relapsed in the leukemic phase and were treated with HIDAC. However, few pts carried this diagnosis and a larger number of pts are required before drawing firm conclusions. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Introduction Based on the activity of ofatumumab in patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and the potential synergistic effect of bortezomib in combination with anti-CD20 antibody therapy, a phase II study to investigate the effect of the combination of ofatumumab and bortezomib in patients with relapsed indolent B-cell NHL who relapsed >6 months after receiving a rituximab-containing regimen was initiated. Methods Patients 18 years or older with a pathologically confirmed low-grade B-cell NHL who relapsed >6 months after a rituximab-containing regimen were included in our study. Other inclusion criteria were ECOG performance status <2, and adequate organ function (creatinine <2 mg/dl, total bilirubin <1.5x ULN, and liver transaminases <2.5x ULN) and bone marrow reserve (neutrophils >0.75, and platelets >50,000/uL). Exclusion criteria included HBV+, HIV+, transformed lymphoma, primary cutaneous lymphoma, central nervous system involvement, <6 months expected survival, and active infection. Treatment consisted of ofatumumab 1,000 mg IV and bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 IV given weekly for 4 weeks (induction), then every 2 months (maintenance) to complete 12 months of therapy. Valacyclovir or acyclovir was given for herpes zoster prophylaxis while on bortezomib. Acetaminophen, diphenhydramine and glucocorticoids were administered prior to ofatumumab infusions. Response was assessed based on the Cheson criteria (2007). A sample size of 44 patients was planned, and an interim analysis after enrollment of 10 patients was undertaken to evaluate safety and early efficacy. Results We present data on 10 patients enrolled between October 2010 and April 2013. Median age was 66 years (range 55-93 years); eight patients (80%) were 60 years or older. There were 7 (70%) men and 3 (30%) women. LDH was elevated in 8 patients (80%). ECOG performance status was 0 in 9 (90%) and 1 in 1 patient (10%). Six patients (60%) had a histological diagnosis of follicular lymphoma, 1 (10%) mantle cell lymphoma, 1 (10%) small lymphocytic lymphoma, 1 (10%) marginal zone lymphoma, and 1 (10%) low-grade B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified. Stage III/IV was seen in 5 patients (50%). Eight patients (80%) had a high-risk FLIPI score. Median time from initial diagnosis to current therapy was 65 months (range 20-204 months). Median time from last rituximab-containing regimen was 24 months (range 11-48 months). Median number of previous therapies was 2 (range 1-4). Three patients (30%) had previously received radiotherapy. One patient (10%) had previously undergone autologous stem cell transplantation. Response rates after induction therapy were: 1 (10%) complete response (CR), 3 (30%) partial response (PR), 3 (30%) stable disease, 1 (10%) progressive disease, and 2 (20%) not evaluable for response. With exception of 1 patient who continues on therapy, the patients who achieved a response or had stable disease after induction therapy showed progression of disease during maintenance. Median duration of response in patients who responded was 4 months (range 1-9 months). At the time of this report, 7 patients (70%) are alive with disease, 2 (20%) are alive without evidence of disease, and 1 (10%) has expired. Five grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) occurred; grade 4: diarrhea (n=1) and hyperglycemia (n=1); grade 3: infusion reaction (n=1), nausea (n=1) and rash (n=1). No grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy or hematological AEs were observed. The most common grade 1 or 2 AEs were: infusion reactions (n=6), anemia (n=5), thrombocytopenia (n=5), fatigue (n=4), diarrhea (n=4), hyperglycemia (n=4) and lymphopenia (n=4). No deaths have occurred while on therapy. Conclusions The combination of ofatumumab and bortezomib given weekly for 4 weeks induced a response in 40% and stable disease in 30% of the patients. However, most of the patients experienced progression of disease during the maintenance phase of the study. Furthermore, there were five grade 3 or 4 AEs associated with therapy. Based on this interim analysis, it was decided to stop enrollment. The combination of ofatumumab and bortezomib, however, appears potentially active and deserves further study. Different schemas of therapy with longer induction or different maintenance schedule could prove to be safer and more effective. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Introduction Remission induction rates after a second or greater relapse is a critical endpoint in phase II trials of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A robust benchmark is crucial for identification of novel multi-agent regimens worthy of further study. The Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia and Lymphoma (TACL) consortium previously reported the response rates of children with multiply relapsed and refractory (R/R) ALL treated between 1995 and 2004, which provided a benchmark for clinical trials. To define more recent treatment patterns and test the robustness of this benchmark, we performed a retrospective cohort review of children with R/R ALL who experienced second or greater treatment failure at TACL consortium sites between 2005 and 2013. Patients and Methods Eligible patients were identified at participating TACL institutions. This cohort was comprised of patients with medullary R/R B-cell precursor ALL who experienced at least 2 treatment failures or relapsed after hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Patient demographic data and details of the initial and R/R disease characteristics were abstracted from medical records and entered into a central database. This study was approved by the IRB of each participating institution. Treatment failure was defined by the presence or re-emergence of circulating blasts, M2/M3 BM, or extramedullary (EM) disease despite therapy. Complete remission (CR) was defined as M1 marrow, no EM disease and evidence of peripheral count recovery. For the purpose of statistical analysis, patients who met these criteria without platelet recovery (CRp) or normal blood count recovery (CRi) were included as CR. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were utilized to evaluate the risk of re-induction failure. Predictors included in this preliminary analysis were NCI risk criteria at diagnosis, duration of the prior remission, the treatment attempt number, and the EM and BM status at the start of each therapy attempt. Results This report includes 214 patients. Fifty-six percent were male. At initial diagnosis, 32% were at least 10 years old, 26% had initial white blood cell (WBC) counts over 50,000/µL, and 39% were classified as high risk by the NCI risk criteria (Table 1). Therapy involved various combinations of agents and ranged between 2 and 10 attempts. The CR rate was 42% for third treatment attempt and 24% for fourth and subsequent treatment attempts (Table 2). Treatment failures were significantly associated with increased number of treatment attempts (p < 0.001), shorter duration of previous CR (p < 0.001) and NCI risk category at diagnosis (p = 0.018). Conclusion This preliminary analysis found similar CR rates in patients with third treatment failure compared to the 1st TACL retrospective study of the prior decade (42% vs. 44%, Ko et al, 2010) and an Austrian report with a small cohort of patients (Reismüller et al, 2013). Further analysis will be performed in comparison to the initial TACL retrospective study cohort once enrollment to this study has been completed (approximately 400 patients). A robust, contemporary historical control may serve as an alternative to a randomized control when outcome with past therapies in unacceptably poor. Table 1. Patient Characteristics at Initial Diagnosis of Patients with ALL who received at least two treatment attempt (n = 214 patients) Characteristic No of patients % Age, years < 1 (infants) 18 8 1-9 126 59 10 and over 70 33 WBC count/uL < 50K 128 60 50K and over 56 26 Unknown 30 14 NCI risk criteria at diagnosis Non-infants, standard risk 82 38 Non-infants, high risk 84 39 Non-infants, unknown 30 14 Infants 18 8 Sex Female 94 44 Male 120 56 CNS disease Yes 42 20 No 148 69 Unknown 24 11 Karyotype1 Normal 68 30 11q23 (MLL gene) rearranged 19 8 Hypodiploidy 7 3 Hyperdiploidy 26 12 iAMP21 2 1 t(12;21) 6 3 t(1;19) 7 3 t(9;22) 15 7 Other 46 21 Unknown 28 12 1 Karyotype is available for 214 unique patients; 2 entries were reported for 7 patients, and 4 entries were reported for 1 patient. Table 2. Achievement of CR/CRp/CRi After Treatment of R/R ALL by Preceding Remission Duration and Treatment Attempt Third treatment attempt Fourth through tenth treatment attempt Duration of preceding CR Response Total % Response Total % Not achieved (refractory) 24 63 38 20 86 23 < 18 months duration 28 78 36 11 49 22 18 to 36 months duration 9 15 60 3 5 60 ≥ 36 months duration 8 8 100 0 1 0 All patients combined 69 164 42 34 141 24 Disclosures Sun: Gateway for Cancer Researchy: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Wilkes:Healthcare Research and Quality: Research Funding; Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation: Research Funding. Gaynon:Bristol Meyers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sigma Tau: Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau. Wayne:Medimmune: Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; NIH: Patents & Royalties; Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: travel support; Pfizer: Honoraria; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding. Whitlock:Amgen: Honoraria.