Academic literature on the topic 'Bad breath – Homeopathic treatment'

Abstract The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of oral hygiene practices and halitosis among undergraduate students from King Saud University, College of Dentistry. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed among all 481 students; 263 male and 218 female students. A questionnaire was developed to assess the self-reported perception of oral breath, awareness of bad breath, timing of bad breath, treatment received for bad breath, oral hygiene practices, caries and bleeding gums, dryness of the mouth, smoking and tea drinking habits, and tongue coating. The response rate was 77%. Forty four percent of male and 32% of female students reported the self-perception of breath odor. Self-treatment was sought by 12% male and 22% female. Six percent of males and 4% of females experienced bad breath interference at their work. Seventy-eight percent of male and 62% of female students experienced bad breath after waking up. Brushing was prevalent among 81% of male and 99% of female students. Both miswak (chewing sticks) and tooth brushing were used by 53% male and 83% female students. Fifty seven percent of male students and 44% of female students reported caries. Bleeding gingiva was experienced by 26% of males and 14% of females. Dry mouth was common among 14% of males and 17% of females, while smoking was prevalent among 13% of males and 2% of females. Tea drinking was common among 44% of males and 37% of females, while tongue coating was equally common among both males and females (21% and 20%), respectively. The results indicate female students had better oral hygiene practices, significantly less self-reported oral bad breath, and smoked less compared to male students. There was no difference in tongue coating among male and female students. Further research is needed to examine oral malodor clinically and objectively by the standard procedures available. Students should be motivated to be a health symbol and keeping their mouths free from oral malodor. Citation Almas K, Al-Hawish A, Al-Khamis W. Oral Hygiene Practices, Smoking Habits, and Self-Perceived Oral Malodor Among Dental Students. J Contemp Dent Pract 2003 November;(4)4:077-090.

ABSTRACT ‘Halitosis’ or bad breath is an unpleasant problem that affects people socially and psychologically. Halitosis is caused by a mixture of breath with malodorous compounds emanating from different areas of the oral cavity, respiratory tract and upper digestive tracts. Breath odor research captured the scientific community's attention during the last few decades. This has led to advances in analytical instruments used for identification and measurement of these malodorous compounds. The dental profession's response to the problem of halitosis has been met with hurdles in regards therapy often due to perceptive differences of the patient. This review attempts to highlight the identification, classification, diagnosis and treatment of halitosis. How to cite this article Kini VV, Pereira R, Padhye A, Kanagotagi S, Pathak T, Gupta H. Diagnosis and Treatment of Halitosis: An Overview. J Contemp Dent 2012;2(3):89-95.

Background Mechanical trauma, bacterial and viral infections are common in Trachemys dorbigni when in captivity. Aims Report the evolution of homeopathic treatment in a patient of Trachemys dorbigni species. Methodology Homeopathic treatment was chosen, based on the principle of similitude, using Arnica montana due to its anti-inflammatory action, Avena sativa for the physical fatigue; Silicea to act in suppurative processes and Thuya occidentalis in papillomatosis. Results On 22/11/2018, with 1 month old, 6g, it presented lethargy, hyporexia, locomotor difficulty due to edema and necrotic process in the right anterior limb, presenting bad prognosis and possible limb loss. The protocol was 2 globules of Arnica montana 6CH, diluted in the contact water, every 8 hours, for 7 days and 2 globules of Avena sativa 6CH, every 12 hours, for 5 days. After 7 days, it was observed that the patient was active, normoretic, with weight gain and decreased edema and necrotic process of the right anterior limb, ruling out the amputation. On 29/12/2018, the patient presented a rigid abscess in the right cervical region, that adopted protocol with a single dose of 2 globules of Silicea 6CH and 2 globules of Arnica montana 6CH, diluted in the contact water, every 24 hours, for 4 days, until the return on 02/01/2019, with the complete regression. On 13/01/2019, it presented papillomas and plastron infection, which the proposed treatment was constituted with administration of 2 globules of Thuya occidentalis 12CH, diluted in the contact water, every 24 hours for 3 days, with total remission of the lesions occurring in 3 days. Conclusion Mechanical trauma, bacterial and viral infections can be controlled by homeopathic medicaments without the administration of antibiotic or surgeries, being fast, less harmful and with an affordable economic value.

Abstract Bad breath (oral malodor, halitosis) can be detrimental to one's self-image and confidence causing social, emotional, and psychological anxiety. With the majority of breath problems having an oral origin, the dental office is the most logical place for patients to seek treatment. When patients look to dental professionals for expert advice, it is critical they have the knowledge base and communication techniques to provide quality clinical assessment and implement effective intervention programs. Moreover, dental professionals should feel comfortable proactively counseling patients about oralmalodor without fear of offending the patient. Numerous continuing education programs and journalarticles related to the diagnosis and treatment of oral malodor are available. In addition, electronic sources are accessible for dental professionals to expand their knowledge base regarding oral malodor information. Fewer resources are available, however, regarding techniques to facilitate an effective dialogue with patients on this sensitive issue. This article seeks to provide such information and to helpprofessionals tailor the target communication message to meet the specific needs of individual patients.

Abstract Objective The aim of the study was to identify indicated homeopathic remedies based on the clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in India. Methods In this retrospective, cohort study, confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted at a COVID Health Centre in New Delhi between April 29 and June 17, 2020 were given conventional and homeopathic treatment. Patients were grouped into mild, moderate or severe categories of disease. Their symptomatologic profiles were analyzed to identify indicated homeopathic medicines. Results A total of 196 COVID-19 patients were admitted. One hundred and seventy-eight patients had mild symptoms; eighteen patients had moderate symptoms; no patients with severe symptoms were included as they were referred to tertiary care centers with ventilatory support. The mean age of patients with mild symptoms was significantly lower (38.6 years; standard deviation or SD ± 15.8) compared with patients in the moderate category (66.0 years; SD ± 9.09). The most important symptoms identified were fever (43.4%), cough (47.4%), sore throat (29.6%), headache (18.4%), myalgia (17.9%), fatigue (16.8%), chest discomfort (13.8%), chills (12.6%), shortness of breath (11.2%) and loss of taste (10.2%). Twenty-eight homeopathic medicines were prescribed, the most frequently indicated being Bryonia alba (33.3%), Arsenicum album (18.1%), Pulsatilla nigricans (13.8%), Nux vomica (8%), Rhus toxicodendron (7.2%) and Gelsemium sempervirens (5.8%), in 30C potency. Conclusion Data from the current study reveal that Arsenicum album, Bryonia alba, Pulsatilla nigricans, Nux vomica, Rhus toxicodendron and Gelsemium sempervirens are the most frequently indicated homeopathic medicines. A randomized controlled clinical trial based on this finding is the next step.

Halitosis is known as bad breath that emanates from the oral cavity either intra-oral and/or extra-oral origins with different nomenclature such as oral malodor, foetor ex ore, bad breath, foul smell or in Bengali durgondha. Fifty percent of people worldwide view themselves as having halitosis, with (85.0-90.0%) of the etiology being intra-oral. Oral causes include basically tongue coating and other various causes like tooth decay, periodontitis, chronic gingivitis, oral infections, pericoronitis, calculus deposition, oral mucosal ulceration (bacterial and/or fungal), impacted food particles, orthodontic problems and poor oral hygiene practice. These sorts of foul smell of the oral cavity most often results from the bacterial degradation of oral organic substrates as volatile sulfur compounds (VSC). The source of halitosis may be related both to oral and systemic condition, but majority of cases are commonly related to oral factors. So far knowledge goes there have been a few studies evaluating the prevalence of bad mouth breath (BMB) in general population. The aim of this reviews are the classification of halitosis, assessment, diagnosis, intra-oral and systemic contributing factors, treatment, management and clinical application.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jssmc.v5i2.20767J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med Coll 2013;5(2):106-110

Introduction: Symptoms of periodontal disease like redness, bleeding on brushing, loosening of affected teeth, and persistent bad breath are not usually documented in a research report. Such symptoms are highly relevant from the patient’s point of view and often have a considerable adverse impact on their daily quality of life. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the periodontal health status and its impact on quality of life. Methods: Clinical attachment loss of total 100 participants were measured at six sites of all teeth and patients divided into severity groups according to loss of attachment. The Nepalese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) was used to assess impact of periodontal status on patient’s quality of life. In addition, participants were also asked to complete a simple ‘yes/no’ checklist of symptoms relating to their periodontal health in the past year which included swollen gums, sore gums, receding gums, loose teeth, drifting teeth, bad breath, or toothache. Results: Overall OHIP-14 score significantly differed between patient groups. The impact of oral health on quality of life was greater in patients with high/severe periodontitis and the result was statistically significant (p=0.001). Conclusion: There is significant difference between oral health related quality of life in healthy and periodontally involved patients as assessed by using OHIP-14. Treatment strategies should focus on improving the quality of life of periodontal patients.

Relevance. Modern data confirm multimicrobial etiology of oral malodor that can significantly compromise effective therapy. Thus, it is relevent to perform comprehensive study of causes of oral malodour, based on microbiological study of composition of mixed microbial biofilms including culturable and non-culturable microbes and evaluation of efficacy of mouth rinses with broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents.Purpose. To study oral microbiota in oral malodor and its correction with antibacterial mouth rinses.Materials and methods. Subjects, involved in the study, were divided into 3 groups, each having 20 people. Controls didn’t use mouth rinses; experimental group used mouth rinse, containing multicidum; in comparison group chlorhxidine containing mouth rinse was used. Orgnoleptic measurement based on 0-5 Rosenberg scale was applied to score intensity of oral malodor. Coating of the root of the tongue was studied by culture-based methods.Results. The research showed that Multicidum® mouth rinse in comprehensive oral malodor treatment affects aerobic bacteria involved in the pathologic process causing bad breath. Positive effect manifested itself organoleptically according to Rosenberg scale in foul breath reduction and in composition changes of microbiota of the root of the tongue. At thus, amount of microorganisms producing smelly volatile compounds decreased and the number of bacteria inhibiting this process increased amid reduction of spore-forming bacteria that contribute to maintenance of stable microbial communities in oral malodor.Conclusion. Gram-positive cocci and Bacillus-Streptococcus, Enterobacter, Staphylococcus, Granulicatella adiacens, Rothia and aerobic spore-forming bacteria from the Bacillus family that are involved in maintaining the functions of resistant bacterial communities-predominated among the bacteria identified in patients with halitosis. There was a statistically significant decrease in the severity of halitosis under the action of a rinse aid, the main active substance of which is Multicidum , and the absence of a statistically significant effect when using a rinse aid based on chlorhexidine.

Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Homoeopathy, Technikon Natal, 1999.
The purpose of this placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy of the homoeopathic simillimum treatment in halitosis in terms of the volatile sulphur compounds being measured objectively by the portable sulphide monitor and subjectively by organoleptic measurement\x87
M

M.Tech.
Alcohol intoxication is often linked to crime, motor vehicle accidents, violence and acts of aggression. There is currently no reversal agent or antidote available for alcohol intoxication. A study conducted by the University of Johannesburg, reports positive results when using Chelidonium 3cH and 30cH to reduce breath alcohol levels. Homeopathy is a therapeutic system based primarily on the Law of Similars. The drug picture of Chelidonium majus is well matched to the symptom picture of acute alcohol intoxication and is thus a well-indicated remedy to treat the symptoms of this condition. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of the homeopathic preparations Chelidonium majus 3cH and 30cH to reduce breath alcohol levels when compared to a placebo. This was a double blind, placebo controlled study. The sample groups were recruited using advertisements at the University of Johannesburg Doornfontein Campus and surrounding areas and consisted of thirty male participants between 20 and 45 years of age. Participants were required to attend three experimental sessions. The researcher completed a selection form to exclude interested parties with abnormal vital sign readings, diabetes, drug or alcohol addiction, history of cerebrovascular accident (stroke), diagnosed hypotension or hypertension, diagnosed hyperlipidaemia, liver or gallbladder disease, recent head trauma, taking any medication contra-indicating alcohol ingestion or history of chronic cardiac or renal disease. The Widmark formula was used to determine the exact amount of 43% brandy, diluted with cola drink to obtain a 20% volume-to-volume dilution. These calculations were done according to the weight of each participant to ensure that their breath alcohol concentrations were increased to the legal limit of 0.08 mg/dL. In the first session, the participants only consumed the alcohol to establish a baseline reading for their breath alcohol levels. During session two participants in the experimental group received a single powder medicated with Chelidonium majus 3cH. Participants in the placebo group received an unmedicated powder. During session three participants in the experimental group received a single powder medicated with Chelidonium majus 30cH. Participants in the placebo group received an unmedicated powder. During each session breath alcohol measurements were taken and recorded at twenty minutes, forty minutes, sixty minutes and eighty minutes after the initial alcoholic beverage has been ingested. The breath alcohol readings were statistically analysed and compared by Ms. Riette Eiselen, Head: Statistical Consultation Services (STATKOM), University of Johannesburg. Independent sample t-tests and a Mann-Whitney test were used to determine if there was any significant difference between the median breath alcohol reductions of the experimental and the control group. These tests indicated that there was no significant difference between the median breath alcohol reductions of the experimental and the control group on any variable at any point in time for any one of the sessions. A One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test was utilised to determine if there was any significant reduction in breath alcohol levels during the 3 sessions in both the experimental and control groups. The test revealed that both groups showed a significant decrease in breath alcohol concentrations but that there was no significant difference between the breath alcohol reductions between groups. Participation in the study was voluntary and withdrawal or refusal to continue was allowed at any time. Participants had the option to remain anonymous. Since Chelidonium majus 3cH and 30cH are rarely associated with side effects, the risk factors for participants in the study were minimal and no adverse effects were anticipated. In the event of an emergency, medical personnel were on standby. Participants were requested not to leave the venue until breathalyzer tests revealed a breath alcohol concentration of 0.01 g/dL. The results of the study were made available to the participants on request.

A halitose é uma condição ou alteração do hálito, sendo caracterizada por um hálito desagradável emitido pela expiração. Segundo a Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS), é considerado um problema de saúde, visto que afeta cerca de 40% da população mundial. Este problema causa desconforto e constrangimento social, sendo assim um limitador da qualidade de vida e da autoestima de quem a padece. Atualmente sabe-se que a halitose pode ser caracterizada como verdadeira, pseudo-halitose ou halitofobia. A halitose verdadeira pode ser uma halitose patológica ou fisiológica. A sua etiologia é multifatorial e o seu tratamento é multidisciplinar. Por outro lado, tanto a pseudo-halitose como a halitofobia provêm do foro psicológico, sendo necessário a ajuda de um psicólogo ou psiquiatra. Existem vários testes de diagnóstico (halímetro, cromatografia gasosa, BANA, entre outros) para avaliar a presença e a severidade desta patologia. O tratamento desta patologia consiste na eliminação das cáries e doenças periodontais, dando instruções de higiene oral para reforçar a escovagem dentária, o uso do fio dentário e a higiene das próteses. O aconselhamento dietético e a limpeza da língua também são essenciais, como também o controlo do biofilme com anti-séticos orais (Abreu et alii., 2011; Machado et alii., 2008). O objetivo desta revisão bibliográfica assenta na determinação de diversas possibilidades de prevenção e tratamento bem como a sua eficácia, sendo esta fundamental para o reconhecimento e correta interpretação da halitose. A pesquisa bibliográfica sobre o tema “Halitose: da etiologia ao tratamento” foi realizada essencialmente em motores de busca como o Pubmed e a Scielo, em três idiomas, Português, Inglês e Espanhol. selecionando artigos na sua maioria entre os anos 2006-2016. O médico médico dentista tem como função, na maioria dos casos, de tratar esta patologia ou então, quando não está associada à cavidade oral, reencaminhar o paciente para a especialidade médica adequada. Contudo, é de salientar que o paciente também possui um papel ativo no tratamento e na manutenção da halitose.
Halitosis is a condition or change of breath and it is characterized by a bad breath issued by expiration. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), it is considered a health problem that affects about 40% of world population. This problem causes discomfort and social embarrassment , therefore a limiting quality of life and self esteem of those who suffer. Nowadays, it is known that halitosis can be characterized as true or pseudohalitosis or halitophobia. The real halitosis can be a physiological or pathological halitosis. Its etiology is multifactorial, being the treatment multidisciplinary. Moreover, the pseudo-halitosis and halitophobia have psychological conditions, requiring the help of a psychologist or psychiatrist. There are several diagnostic tests (halimeter , gas chromatography, BANA , and others) to assess the presence and severity of this disease. The treatment of this pathology consists in the tooth decay removal as well as the periodontal disease. Additionally, instruction oral hygiene can be given such as the increase the tooth brushing, the use of dental flossing and dental prosthesis. Dietary advices and tongue cleaning are also essential, as well as the control of biofilms with oral anti-septics. The purpose of this literature review consist to understand halitosis prevention and treatment as well as its effectiveness. Being this approach of great importance, to detect and for the correct interpretation of halitosis. The bibliographic research for the theme "Halitosis : from etiology to treatment" essentially performed in Pubmed and Scielo. Selecting articles mostly between the years 2006-2016, in three languages Portuguese , English and Spanish. In most cases, this pathology is treated by dentist or by a medical specialist when not associated with the oral cavity. However, it is well known the importance of the patient´s active role in the treatment and control of halitosis.