Relevant bibliographies by topics / Balkan Peninsula War of 1912-1913

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Balkan Peninsula War of 1912-1913'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 29 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Balkan Peninsula War of 1912-1913.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Balkan Peninsula War of 1912-1913"

1

Kudryavtseva, Anastasia A. "The Balkan Peninsula in 1912-1913 and the Aggravation of the Situation on the Eve of the First World War." IZVESTIYA VUZOV SEVERO-KAVKAZSKII REGION SOCIAL SCIENCE, no. 3 (219) (September 25, 2023): 92–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.18522/2687-0770-2023-3-92-96.

Full text
Abstract:
The key issues of increasing international tension on the Balkan Peninsula before the First World War are considered. The subject of the study is the Balkan Peninsula, located at the crossroads of civilizations, which has been the sphere of geopolitical interests of various coalitions for thousands of years. The Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 are presented as a pivotal moment in the history of the peninsula in the 20th century. First of all, the process of national liberation of the territories of the Balkans from Ottoman rule, as well as the process of military actions aimed at gaining independence, is considered. The article analyzes the importance played by the countries of the Balkan peninsula during the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913, and also shows the actions of these countries to form the moods they need to achieve the greatest territorial gains. At the same time, the role of the great powers, primarily Russia, in the process of the Balkan conflicts is analyzed. The chronicle of the foreign policy events of the early 20th century related to Russia's participation in the solution of the Balkan issue is researched. On the basis of publications of that time, the existing image of Bulgaria and Serbia is reconstructed, an attempt is made to restore the real picture of the life of these states on the eve of the First World War and its features, to understand the peculiarity of Westernization “in the Balkan way”. The complex of the two Balkan wars of 1912-1913 is considered primarily as a basis for the development of the future conflictogenicity of the region, which led to the First World War.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Jagodić, Miloš. "Roads and Railway Lines in Serbia after the Balkan Wars." European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies 1, no. 1 (April 30, 2016): 175. http://dx.doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v1i1.p175-184.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper deals with Kingdom of Serbia’s plans on roads and railways construction in the regions annexed 1913, after the Balkan Wars. Plans are presented in detail, as well as achievements until 1915, when the country was occupied by enemy forces in the World War One. It is shown that plans for future roads and railways network were made according to the changed geopolitical conditions in the Balkan Peninsula, created as the consequence of the Balkan Wars 1912-1913. The paper draws mainly on unpublished archival sources of Serbian origin.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Peza-Perriu, Majlinda. "RELATIONS BETWEEN ALBANIAN AND BULGARIAN DURING 1912-1914." Knowledge International Journal 28, no. 7 (December 10, 2018): 2447–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.35120/kij28072447m.

Full text
Abstract:
The history of the Balkans has been and is the story of the peoples who have lived and tried for the relationship of a worthy and peaceful neighborhood on this peninsula. But in a few cases, these relationships are defined by state policies and as such have been conflicting. Referring to political developments, after the First Balkan War Balkan conflicts between the Balkan states conditioned the outbreak of the Second Balkan War. Albania's destiny was directly linked to these Balkan conflicts. The only Balkan state, which had no territorial claims in Albania, resulted to be Bulgaria. In this regard, we point out that Bulgaria's interests after the First Balkan War resonated with the interests of Albanians. The decision of the Ambassadors' Conference in London unduly left outside the borders of the new Albanian state almost half of the country's lands. Did Bulgaria support the new Albanian state at the London Conference of Ambassadors? What was the attitude of the Bulgarian population during the Albanian uprising against the Serbs of 1913? The treatment and analysis of these issues is also the focus of our research in the framework of this scientific paper. In reflecting on such issues, we have relied on the consultation of a broad and contemporary literature, seen in the context of comparability of archival documents, with new approaches and attitudes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Peza-Perriu, Majlinda. "RELATIONS BETWEEN ALBANIAN AND BULGARIAN DURING 1912-1914." Knowledge International Journal 28, no. 7 (December 10, 2018): 2447–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.35120/kij29082447m.

Full text
Abstract:
The history of the Balkans has been and is the story of the peoples who have lived and tried for the relationship of a worthy and peaceful neighborhood on this peninsula. But in a few cases, these relationships are defined by state policies and as such have been conflicting. Referring to political developments, after the First Balkan War Balkan conflicts between the Balkan states conditioned the outbreak of the Second Balkan War. Albania's destiny was directly linked to these Balkan conflicts. The only Balkan state, which had no territorial claims in Albania, resulted to be Bulgaria. In this regard, we point out that Bulgaria's interests after the First Balkan War resonated with the interests of Albanians. The decision of the Ambassadors' Conference in London unduly left outside the borders of the new Albanian state almost half of the country's lands. Did Bulgaria support the new Albanian state at the London Conference of Ambassadors? What was the attitude of the Bulgarian population during the Albanian uprising against the Serbs of 1913? The treatment and analysis of these issues is also the focus of our research in the framework of this scientific paper. In reflecting on such issues, we have relied on the consultation of a broad and contemporary literature, seen in the context of comparability of archival documents, with new approaches and attitudes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Gorodnia, Nataliia. "Coverage of International Situation in June-July 1914 by the «Kiyevlianin» Newspaper." European Historical Studies, no. 16 (2020): 53–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/2524-048x.2020.16.5.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper studies the ways in which international situation in June-July 1914 was covered by «Kiyevlianin», a daily influential newspaper published in Kyiv, then Russian Empire. This research focuses on the main international themes covered by the «Kiyevlianin» newspaper after assassination of Habsburg hair Archduke Franz Ferdinand, and until the Austro-Hungarian Note to Serbia was reported. The major focus of the study is international situation in the Balkans, especially the conflict between Austria-Hungary and Serbia, and Russian Empire’s Balkan policy. The author considers those days’ newspapers a valuable source for a historical research as they provided information while the events were ongoing, and their direction and outcomes were not known yet. The understanding of those days’ events by contemporaries may differ from later academic interpretations. For this reason, the study of these newspapers deepens our understanding of international situation before the Great War. The research has revealed that the Austro-Serbian conflict was only one of the numerous conflicts in the Balkans. The international situation on the peninsula dramatically changed after the Balkan wars of 1912-1913 in favor of Serbia, and the potential of further conflicts essentially increased. The reporters understood that any minor changes in the situation could trigger a new Balkan war. The major driving forces behind the Austro-Serbian conflict were “Great Serbian” idea, Serbia’s positioning as the “Piedmont” of Southern Slavs (at the expense of Austro-Hungary), and Russia’s Balkan policy. The latter was represented by the Russian envoy to Belgrade Nikolay Gartvig. According to him, backing of Serbia was caused by Russia’s geopolitical interests of anti-Austrian character. Russia’s backing in July 1914 prompted the Serbian regent Alexander not to comply with the Austro-Hungarian Note and to escalate the conflict. Thus, Russia’s pro-Serbian and anti-Austrian policy was the major factor which caused the war.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Anđelković, Miša. "Fallen fighters from the villages of Činiglavci, Obrenovac, Srećkovac, Planinica and Milojkovac and their memorials." Pirotski zbornik, no. 47 (2022): 83–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/pirotzbor2247083a.

Full text
Abstract:
The whirlwind of war from the beginning and end of the 20th century on the Balkan Peninsula also affected the villages on the outskirts of the Pirot municipality. Conscripted soldiers, volunteers and mobilized population of the villages of Činiglavac, Obrenovac, Srećkovac, Planinica and Milojkovac took part in the Balkan wars of 1912-1913, the First and Second World War, as well as in the wars of 1991-1999, and some of them died. Civilian population suffered, too. Today monuments dedicated to fallen soldiers, memorial plaques, memorial boards as well as tombstones evidence all those events. This work aims to emphasize the importance of the memorials but also to point out the differences in the spelling of the names, surnames and middle letters of the fallen fighters, as well as the place and the year of their death. In addition to the sources from the archives and literature, the author used private collection of documents, statements of the fallen fighters descendants as well as the data from the memorials and tombstones of the fallen fighters.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Videnovic, Milan. "The outbreak of the First Balkan War and the Italo-Turkish peace negotiations in Lausanne in 1912." Balcanica, no. 54 (2023): 103–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/balc2354103v.

Full text
Abstract:
Analyzing published and unpublished sources, the paper aims to determine to what extent the crisis in the Balkan Peninsula influenced the dynamics and stages of the negotiations in Lausanne between the Italian and Turkish delegations to end the Italo-Turkish War. The analysis spans from mid-July to the signing of the First Treaty of Lausanne (Treaty of Ouchy) and the entry of Serbia, Bulgaria, and Greece in the war against Turkey on 18 October 1912. Italy tried to end its conflict with Turkey and prevent the Balkan countries in their aspiration to disrupt the status quo in the Balkan Peninsula. Italian diplomacy used the friction between the Balkan countries and Turkey to conclude as favorable a treaty as possible, directly pressuring the Turkish delegation at Ouchy and using the great powers? pressure on Turkey. The practical results of signing the Treaty of Lausanne were the establishment of direct Italian rule in Libya and retaining temporary control of the Aegean islands.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Iskenderov, Petr. "Balkan Wars 1912–1913 and new regional challenges." OOO "Zhurnal "Voprosy Istorii" 2024, no. 2 (February 1, 2024): 04–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.31166/voprosyistorii202402statyi15.

Full text
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the situation in the Balkan Peninsula after the Balkan Wars 1912-1913. The author pays particular attention to the Serbo-Albanian contradictions. The article is based on unpublished archive documents.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Erol, Baykal. "Istanbul During the Balkan Wars (1912–1913)." Turkish Historical Review 5, no. 2 (October 7, 2014): 141–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18775462-00501002.

Full text
Abstract:
During the Balkan Wars (1912–1913) Istanbul suddenly found itself at the frontline of an unexpectedly disastrous conflict with its Balkan neighbours. One direct consequence of these wars, through troop mobilisation and refugee movement, was a major outbreak of cholera in the Ottoman capital. While entrepreneurs tried to turn this calamity into profit, by selling (useless) medication, the government tried to control the flow of information regarding the disease in order to better combat the epidemic and both parties used the press to achieve their goals. Despite the chaos of the war and the size of the outbreak, the acted efficiently and successfully prevented a potential disaster.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Bregu, Edit, and Irvin Faniko. "The War of Shkodra in the Framework of the Balkan Wars, 1912-1913." Journal of Educational and Social Research 11, no. 1 (January 17, 2021): 124. http://dx.doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2021-0013.

Full text
Abstract:
Before starting the First Balkan War, the Great Powers were not prepared for a quick victory of the young Balkan allies against an old empire, as it was until 1912 the Great Ottoman Empire. At the Ambassadors Conference in London, Austro-Hungary argued that the involvement of Shkodra City was essential to the economy of the new Albanian state. Meanwhile Russia did not open the way for solving the Shkodra problem, Russian diplomats thought how to satisfy Serbia's ambitions in Northeast Albania, respectively in Kosovo Beyond those considerations of a political character, on 8 October 1912, was the youngest member of the Balkan Alliance, the Shkodra northern neighbor, Montenegro, that rushed to launch military actions, thus opening the first campaign of the First Balkan War. The Montenegrin military assault, as its main strategic objective in this war, was precisely the occupation and annexation of the historic city of Shkodra, a city with a big economic and cultural importance for the Albanian people and territory. Received: 7 September 2020 / Accepted: 13 December 2020 / Published: 17 January 2021
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Balkan Peninsula War of 1912-1913"

1

Nicollet, Charlotte. "Ferdinand Ier de Bulgarie : politique étrangère et diplomatie (1887-1918)." Thesis, Paris 4, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016PA040114.

Full text
Abstract:
Fondée en 1878 par le traité de San Stefano, mutilée par celui de Berlin, la principauté autonome de Bulgarie voit ses destinées confiées en 1887 à Ferdinand de Saxe-Cobourg et Gotha. Le nouveau knyaz est contraint dès son avènement à imposer sa personne et les ambitions de son pays dans l’arène internationale. Après une lutte de longue haleine pour obtenir la reconnaissance de son titre par le concert européen, il s’évertue à mener les Bulgares vers la réalisation de leurs idéaux nationaux. Il se heurte aux blocages dus aux liens unissant Sofia à Constantinople, à la rivalité des États environnants et aux politiques balkaniques contradictoires des puissances. Le prince aiguise au fil des ans son sens de la diplomatie et déploie une politique extérieure visant à tirer profit à la fois de la position stratégique de son pays et des rivalités des forces en présence, tout en exploitant à bon escient les circonstances successives. Sa politique de bascule aux ressorts progressivement définis est mise en œuvre, et à l’épreuve, au cours des secousses qui rythment les deux premières décennies du XXe siècle. Si elle permet à la Bulgarie d’accéder à l’indépendance, et au statut de royaume, dans le sillage de la crise bosniaque de 1908, ses revers sont patents pendant les Guerres balkaniques et le premier conflit mondial. Pourtant, force est de constater que ses échecs ne sont pas imputables au seul Ferdinand dont l’examen des faits tend à atténuer les responsabilités dans les « Catastrophes nationales », les deux défaites vécues par les Bulgares en 1913 et 1918, conséquences d’un écheveau de causes d’une grande complexité
The boundaries of an autonomous Bulgarian principality established by the provision of the San Stefano Treaty in 1878 were substantially reduced by the Great Powers at Berlin. Many unresolved problems between Sofia and Saint-Petersburg led to suspension of the bilateral relations and the abdication of Alexander of Battenberg. Ferdinand of Saxe-Cobourg and Gotha was elected Prince in 1887. After a “controversial” accession to the Bulgarian throne, the young knyaz was committed to impose himself and his country’s national interests to the international scene. After a long-term efforts aimed at recognition of his title of king amongst European chancelleries, he tried hard to realise Bulgarian national ideas. However, it undermined relationship between Sofia and Constantinople but also contributed to the rivalry between surrounding States and the Great Powers in the Balkans. Due to his diplomatic experience, Ferdinand opted for a new foreign policy strategy designed to benefit both from the Bulgaria’s strategic position and the rivalry between powers. Thus, the first two decades of the 20th century were marked by the tumult of Balkan politics. However, it allowed Bulgaria to gain independence, the status of the Kingdom in the wake of the Bosnian crisis in 1908, and the defeats during the Balkan Wars and the First World War. The defeats are not attributable entirely to Ferdinand who was the most responsible for the “National Catastrophes” in 1913 and 1918. This research has shown that fact-based analysis provides a more nuanced picture of Ferdinand’s reign which was effected by a complexity of contributing factors that inevitably plunged the country into international isolation and defeat in the Great War
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Nicollet, Charlotte. "Ferdinand Ier de Bulgarie : politique étrangère et diplomatie (1887-1918)." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 4, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016PA040114.

Full text
Abstract:
Fondée en 1878 par le traité de San Stefano, mutilée par celui de Berlin, la principauté autonome de Bulgarie voit ses destinées confiées en 1887 à Ferdinand de Saxe-Cobourg et Gotha. Le nouveau knyaz est contraint dès son avènement à imposer sa personne et les ambitions de son pays dans l’arène internationale. Après une lutte de longue haleine pour obtenir la reconnaissance de son titre par le concert européen, il s’évertue à mener les Bulgares vers la réalisation de leurs idéaux nationaux. Il se heurte aux blocages dus aux liens unissant Sofia à Constantinople, à la rivalité des États environnants et aux politiques balkaniques contradictoires des puissances. Le prince aiguise au fil des ans son sens de la diplomatie et déploie une politique extérieure visant à tirer profit à la fois de la position stratégique de son pays et des rivalités des forces en présence, tout en exploitant à bon escient les circonstances successives. Sa politique de bascule aux ressorts progressivement définis est mise en œuvre, et à l’épreuve, au cours des secousses qui rythment les deux premières décennies du XXe siècle. Si elle permet à la Bulgarie d’accéder à l’indépendance, et au statut de royaume, dans le sillage de la crise bosniaque de 1908, ses revers sont patents pendant les Guerres balkaniques et le premier conflit mondial. Pourtant, force est de constater que ses échecs ne sont pas imputables au seul Ferdinand dont l’examen des faits tend à atténuer les responsabilités dans les « Catastrophes nationales », les deux défaites vécues par les Bulgares en 1913 et 1918, conséquences d’un écheveau de causes d’une grande complexité
The boundaries of an autonomous Bulgarian principality established by the provision of the San Stefano Treaty in 1878 were substantially reduced by the Great Powers at Berlin. Many unresolved problems between Sofia and Saint-Petersburg led to suspension of the bilateral relations and the abdication of Alexander of Battenberg. Ferdinand of Saxe-Cobourg and Gotha was elected Prince in 1887. After a “controversial” accession to the Bulgarian throne, the young knyaz was committed to impose himself and his country’s national interests to the international scene. After a long-term efforts aimed at recognition of his title of king amongst European chancelleries, he tried hard to realise Bulgarian national ideas. However, it undermined relationship between Sofia and Constantinople but also contributed to the rivalry between surrounding States and the Great Powers in the Balkans. Due to his diplomatic experience, Ferdinand opted for a new foreign policy strategy designed to benefit both from the Bulgaria’s strategic position and the rivalry between powers. Thus, the first two decades of the 20th century were marked by the tumult of Balkan politics. However, it allowed Bulgaria to gain independence, the status of the Kingdom in the wake of the Bosnian crisis in 1908, and the defeats during the Balkan Wars and the First World War. The defeats are not attributable entirely to Ferdinand who was the most responsible for the “National Catastrophes” in 1913 and 1918. This research has shown that fact-based analysis provides a more nuanced picture of Ferdinand’s reign which was effected by a complexity of contributing factors that inevitably plunged the country into international isolation and defeat in the Great War
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Balkan Peninsula War of 1912-1913"

1

Hall, Richard C. The Balkan Wars 1912-1913. London: Taylor & Francis Inc, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Hall, Richard C. The Balkan Wars 1912-1913. London: Taylor & Francis Inc, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Hall, Richard C. The Balkan Wars 1912-1913. London: Taylor & Francis Group Plc, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Kosev, Kiril. Podvigŭt, 1912-1913. 2nd ed. Sofii︠a︡: Voeno izd-vo, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Artuç, İbrahim. Balkan Savaşı. Cağaloğlu, İstanbul: Kastaş A.Ş. Yayınları, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Nauchna konferent︠s︡ii︠a︡ "80 godini ot nachaloto na Balkanskite voĭni" (1992 Veliko Tŭrnovo, Bulgaria). Balkanskite voĭni: 1912-1913. Veliko Tŭrnovo: Univ. izd-vo "Sv.sv. Kiril i Metodiĭ", 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Nihat, Bursalı Mehmet. 1912 - 1913 Balkan harbi Trakya seferi. İstanbul: Çatalca Kaymakamlığı, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hall, Richard C. The Balkan Wars, 1912-1913: Prelude to the First World War. London: Routledge, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Dragoumēs, Philippos Stephanou. Hēmerologio, Valkanikoi polemoi, 1912-1913. Athēna: Dōdōnē, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Halaçoğlu, Ahmet. Balkan Harbi sırasında Rumeli'den Türk göçleri, 1912-1913. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Balkan Peninsula War of 1912-1913"

1

Williamson, Samuel R. "Militant Diplomacy: the Habsburgs and the First Balkan War, August 1912–May 1913." In Austria-Hungary and the Origins of the First World War, 121–42. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21163-0_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Damjanović, Miloš M. "Language Changes in the Jewish Community in Kosovo and Metohija after the Balkan Wars (1912–1913) and the First World War (1914–1918)." In Languages and the First World War: Representation and Memory, 108–26. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137550361_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

"BALKAN WAR ORIGINS." In The Balkan Wars 1912-1913, 17–37. Routledge, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203138052-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

"FIRST BALKAN WAR." In The Balkan Wars 1912-1913, 61–84. Routledge, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203138052-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Crampton, R. J. "The Balkans." In Twisted Paths, 237–70. Oxford University PressOxford, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199281855.003.0011.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The Balkan peninsula takes its name from the Balkan mountains, the Haemus range of the Ancients, which run east– west through the centre of present-day Bulgaria. The word, which is derived from a Turkic term meaning a wooded upland, was first applied to the peninsula by a German geographer in the early nineteenth century and for much of the remainder of that century it had little more than topographic significance, the political term used for the region being, generally, European Turkey or Turkey in Europe. It was not until the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries that ‘the Balkans’ began to be used regularly as a political definition, and increasingly with pejorative implications. The Balkans, it was believed, were synonymous with struggle, inter-ethnic rivalry, disorder, and danger. Thus the wars of 1912– 13 were not the wars of Ottoman succession but ‘the Balkan wars’. The Balkan wars were held to epitomize the rapacity of the small Balkan nation-states.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

"THE FIRST BALKAN WAR." In The Balkan Wars 1912-1913, 38–60. Routledge, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203138052-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

"INTERALLIED WAR." In The Balkan Wars 1912-1913, 123–45. Routledge, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203138052-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Stevenson, David. "The Great Acceleration, 1912 —1913." In Armaments and the Coming of War, 231–328. Oxford University PressOxford, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198202080.003.0006.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Events in Eastern and in Western Europe must now be brought to their convergence. Continental diplomacy in the last two years of Great-Power peace centred on the outbreak and the aftermath of the Balkan Wars. With constant turmoil in the Eastern Mediterranean it was understood in every chancellery that the situation was much more strained, and at the climax of the winter crisis of 1912-13 Europe reached unprecedented levels of immediate military readiness. In addition, the crisis spectacularly intensified the drive for medium-term preparedness, expressed in massive spending increases and a string of major army laws. Diplomatic and military developments interacted ever more closely, and armaments competition and crisis management must be seen as aspects of a single phenomenon.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

"THE BALKAN WARS AND THE SPIRAL OF ARMAMENTS, 1912–1913." In The Arming of Europe and the Making of the First World War, 173–98. Princeton University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvvh858z.13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

"CHAPTER 6. The Balkan Wars and the Spiral of Armaments, 1912-1913." In The Arming of Europe and the Making of the First World War, 173–98. Princeton University Press, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9780691201382-011.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Balkan Peninsula War of 1912-1913' for particular source types:
Journal articles Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography