Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Barth, Karl (1886-1968) – Religion

Contents

Journal articles
Dissertations / Theses
Books
Book chapters

Academic literature on the topic 'Barth, Karl (1886-1968) – Religion'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 4 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Barth, Karl (1886-1968) – Religion.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Barth, Karl (1886-1968) – Religion"

1

Kendall, Daniel, and Gerald O'Collins. "On Not Neglecting Hatred." Scottish Journal of Theology 47, no. 4 (November 1994): 511–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0036930600046627.

Full text

Abstract:

In 1918, on the very day the First World War ended, Karl Barth (1886–1968) wrote of doing theology with the Bible in one hand and the newspapers in the other. The scriptures and the daily papers converge in presenting one real, if highly unpleasant, feature of our human existence: hatred.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Kirchner, Renato, and Luís Gabriel Provinciatto. "O sentido do fenômeno religioso. As contribuições da Carta aos romanos (do histórico e da facticidade)." Revista Eclesiástica Brasileira 74, no. 296 (October 18, 2018): 867–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.29386/reb.v74i296.451.

Full text

Abstract:

O presente artigo trabalha a questão do fenômeno religioso no início do século XX, mostrando sua realidade e apontando-lhe caminhos para os dias atuais. O século XX, logo em seu início, levantou questionamentos no campo antropológico devido a fatos, que, como o da Primeira Guerra Mundial (1914-1918), modificaram a humanidade como um todo. O fenômeno religioso também sofreu questionamentos, pois, apesar de ser, naquele contexto, uma realidade essencialmente cristã, não conseguiu livrar o Continente europeu do caos. Karl Barth (1886-1968), teólogo alemão, foi um daqueles que ajudou a pensar a questão religiosa neste período histórico, possibilitando que uma de suas obras, a Carta aos romanos (1918), além de abordar aspectos culturais, políticos e sociais, centrasse sua atenção em aspectos religiosos. A manifestação religiosa do homem aparece mesmo como característica essencial, e, contando com a graça divina, o reestabelecimento da ordem e da ligação entre criatura e criador seria então novamente possível. Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) também oferece contribuições para esta análise. Ele estrutura uma preleção – Introdução à fenomenologia da religião – em que lança mão do conceito de experiência fática da vida. Ora, tudo isso contribui para a autenticidade do fenômeno religioso e para justificar a existência humana, mesmo porque ele é parte integrante dela.Abstract: The present article deals with the issue of the religious phenomenon in the early twentieth century, showing its reality and pointing to the paths it should follow in the present day. From its early days, the twentieth century raised questions in the anthropological field because of facts, such as the First World War (1914-1918) that brought changes to the whole of humankind. It also questioned the religious phenomenon because, although it was, in that context, an essentially Christian reality, it had not been able to save the European continent from chaos. Karl Barth, (1886-1968), a German theologian, was one of those who helped to think out the religious issue in this historical period since, in one of his works, Letter to the Romans (1918) besides addressing cultural, political and social aspects, he also focused his attention on religious issues. He presents the human being’s religious manifestation as an essential trait, and with the help of the divine grace, the reestablishment of the order and of the connection between creature and Creator would be possible once more. Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) also contributes towards this analysis. He structures a lecture – Introduction to the Phenomenology of Religion – in which he makes use of the concept of the factual experience of life. Now, all this contributes towards the authenticity of the religious phenomenon and to justify human existence, not least because that phenomenon is an integral part of this existence.Keywords: Religious phenomenon. Letter to the Romans. Factual experience. Karl Barth. Martin Heidegger.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Torrance, T. F. "The Legacy of Karl Barth (1886–1986)." Scottish Journal of Theology 39, no. 3 (August 1986): 289–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0036930600030854.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Chalamet, Christophe. "'Conversations with Karl Barth (1886-1968) - A review of recent studies'." Conversations in Religion and Theology 1, no. 1 (May 2003): 67–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1479-2214.00007.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Gorringe, T. "Review: Ever against the Stream. The Politics of Karl Barth, 1906-1968." Journal of Theological Studies 54, no. 2 (October 1, 2003): 888. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jts/54.2.888.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Sauter, Gerhard. "Why is Karl Barth's Church Dogmatics Not a ‘Theology of Hope’? Some Observations on Barth's Understanding of Eschatology." Scottish Journal of Theology 52, no. 4 (November 1999): 407–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0036930600050468.

Full text

Abstract:

Early in the year 1968 Karl Barth invited me to a discussion that touched upon, among other topics, my second [habilitation] thesis Zukunft und Verheifiung [Future and Promise], which had appeared three years earlier. In it I had attempted to trace the ground of theology eschatologically in God's word of promise, yet without putting the cart before the horse. Barth dressed his inquiry in a comment accented with self-irony. As I recall, it went as follows: ‘Even I began with eschatology and ascribed to it a decisive role for theology. I gave the future priority—but over the years I was forced to realize that I could not maintain this. The more time passed on, the more I became aware that I could not remain standing where I was. Present and past are equally important for theology if theology allows itself to be oriented by God's time. And theology must not confuse this time with one of the dimensions of the human experience of time’. Itsounded as if beginning with eschatology was something like a sin of youthfulness, possibly even like a theological childhood illness which every more or less normal theologian would grow out of in time.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Van Wyk, Gabriël M. J. "Die lewe en werk van Karl Barth (1886–1968): ŉ Leksikografiese bydrae tot Reformasie 500." HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 73, no. 1 (February 28, 2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hts.v73i1.4592.

Full text

Abstract:

Karl Barth was a leading thinker within an influential theological direction that arose in Europeafter the First World War, known as dialectical theology. Comprehensive introductions to thelife and work of Barth in the South African theological journals, written in Afrikaans, eitherdoes not exist, or are difficult to trace for the Afrikaans readership. This article on Barth aims tofill the gap by offering a lexicographical contribution on the life and work of Barth. The focus ofthis article is on Barth as a Reformed theologian. The theme of the New Testament and systematictheology is essentially the same, namely to explain the concept of Christian self-understandingas an eschatological event in which faith is expressed for the sake of faith in God and only inGod. Barth explained the same theological concepts with his theology as those that wereexplained by the church reformers of the 16th century, but under radically new circumstances.The so-called modern and postmodern people of our time not only broke ties with the past, butin the process they also lost their ability for using historical-critical patterns of thought that triesto bridge historical distances, and therefore, sacrificed all efforts to think systematically on thealtar of relativism. We can learn from Barth what systematic reformed theology really is.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Graf, Friedrich Wilhelm. "Karl Barth und Wilhelm Niesel. Briefwechsel 1924–1968. Paul Althaus, Karl Barth, Emil Brunner. Briefwechsel 1922–1966. Karl Barth – Katsumi Tikizawa. Briefwechsel 1934–1968." Journal for the History of Modern Theology / Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte 22, no. 2 (January 1, 2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/znth-2016-0014.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Hreinsson, Haraldur. "Aðferð eða opinberun? Ritdeila Adolfs von Harnack og Karls Barth 1923. Þýðing með inngangi og skýringum." Ritröð Guðfræðistofnunar, no. 49 (2019). http://dx.doi.org/10.33112/theol.49.3.

Full text

Abstract:

In early 1923, a correspondence between the theologians Adolf von Harnack (1851–1930) and Karl Barth (1886–1968) appeared in the German theological journal Christliche Welt. Respectively, Harnack and Barth represented two of the most prominent post-Enlighten-ment theological currents. At the time, Harnack was widely regarded as the leading voice of theological liberalism while Barth was seen as the champion of neo-orthodoxy or dialectical theology, a theological movement on the rise. The correspondence attracted much attention and still today it is seen amongst the most important theological debates of the 20th century. The present article contains a translation of the original 15 questions posed by Harnack and Barth’s answers to them and a commentary on the debate.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Graf, Friedrich Wilhelm. "Karl Barth als Lehrer der Versöhnung (1950–1968). Vertiefung – Öffnung – Hoffnung. Beiträge zum Internationalen Symposion vom 1. bis 4. Mai 2014 in der Johannes a Lasco Bibliothek Emden." Journal for the History of Modern Theology / Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte 23, no. 1 (January 1, 2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/znth-2016-0025.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Barth, Karl (1886-1968) – Religion"

1

Cardon-Bertalot, Philippe. "Détresse et promesse de la prédication chrétienne : Karl Barth, théoricien de la prédication." Université Marc Bloch (Strasbourg) (1971-2008), 1997. http://www.theses.fr/1997STR20091.

Full text

Abstract:

Il s'agit de montrer l'unite fondamentale de la theorie homiletique de karl barth a travers l'evolution de l'oeuvre et de la pensee qui l'anime de 1922 a 1968, c'est-a-dire depuis l'epoque du second romerbrief jusqu'au deces de l'auteur considere. Selon barth, la predication est renvoi a la parole que dieu lui-meme dit en jesus-christ, dans sa revelation donc (identifiee a la resurrection pascale et au temps des quarante jours que le ressuscite passa avec ses disciples jusqu'a son ascension). Il faut par consequent distinguer la parole du predicateur, parole humaine, faillible, datee, faible - d'ou la detresse du predicateur face a sa tache, detresse fondamentale et insurmontable de mains d'homme -, et la parole divine, infaillible, eternelle, puissance de vie et de salut pour quiconque croit. Mais cette differenciation fondamentale n'empeche pas qu'il faut relier ces deux paroles. C'est la promesse dont la predication et l'eglise vivent. Ce lien (praedicatio verbi dei est verbum dei, dira barth constamment a la suite de bullinger) fait de la parole humaine une parabole de la parole divine
The theory of the christian preaching, developped by karl barth throught his whole work, had a great unity. The christian preaching is the reference, from a human, faillible, date, weak, work, to the divine, unfaillible, eternal and allmighty word, jesus-christ himself, the ressuscited, the revelation of god. Karl barth wanted we distingueshed theese two words but he wanted also we bind them. The two movements are both necessary. The human word of the christian preaching is able to become the parable of the divine word when christ attests himself in the word of the preacher. It is the promise from which the christian preaching lives. It's also the distress of the preacher who knows never weather jesus-christ makes a miror of theese words or not for his proper word and grace

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Sansom, Heather R. "Karl Barth's view of war." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1998. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk1/tape11/PQDD_0022/MQ50567.pdf.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Feneuil, Anthony. "Plus qu'une expérience ? : les enjeux épistémologiques de la notion d'expérience chez Karl Barth et Henri Bergson, 1932." Thesis, Lille 3, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013LIL30024.

Full text

Abstract:

Cette étude poursuit l’objectif d’introduire la théologie de Barth en philosophie, à l’aide de la pensée de Bergson. Il y est montré que la conception barthienne de l’expérience religieuse peut être légitimement ressaisie sous la forme d’un problème philosophique d’une pleine actualité, celui de l’expérience pure, que la philosophie de Bergson permet de déployer dans toutes ses dimensions philosophiques
This study aims at introducing Barth’s theology into philosophy, using Bergson’s philosophy. It is shown that Barth’s conception of religious experience can legitimately be reformulated as a philosophical problem, the problem of pure experience, which is of the utmost importance in the current philosophical debate, and that Bergson’s though allows to display in all its philosophical scope

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Farlow, Matthew S. "The dramatising of theology : humanity’s participation in God’s drama with particular reference to the theologies of Hans Urs von Balthasar and Karl Barth." Thesis, University of St Andrews, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2102.

Full text

Abstract:

The aim of this project is to investigate the proper response of theology to the Christian God who, as revealed through revelation, is Being-in-act. This project takes seriously the idea posited by Shakespeare, that totus mundus agit histrionem, and upon this stage ‘all the men and women merely players: They have their exits and their entrances; and one man in his time plays many parts.’ If, then, God’s Being is in act, and as so many have deduced, life and death are enveloped within the drama of everyday, then, might it be possible that our theological endeavours would prosper through a dramatic rendering? In light of this, the project seeks to illumine that it is beneficial for both the Church and society, to realise how drama can be, and is, fruitful for our theological endeavours. God is Being-in-act, and through His revelation, He invites humanity to enter into and participate in His action. In light of the aforementioned, then, theology must contend with the implications for its practices, which, as is being argued, are benefited most through a full embrace of the dramatising of theology. The thesis is situated in the recent movement of our theological endeavours that recognise the profundity of the dramatic and its ability to illuminate God’s action and call to action from theology, the Church and society. Moving forward from the seminal work of Hans Urs von Balthasar, and set forth in the context of the theologies of Balthasar and Karl Barth, this project argues that it is through the dramatising of theology that theology is best equipped to illumine God’s desire for humanity’s participation in His Theo-drama. The dramatising of theology is a natural response to God’s Being-in-act; it is the natural movement of theology’s response to God’s action which calls for an active response on our part. Current examples of today’s theological movement towards the dramatic can be seen in such authors as Max Harris, Trevor Hart, Stanley Hauerwas, Michael Horton, Todd Johnson and Dale Savidge, Ben Quash, Kevin Vanhoozer, Samuel Wells and N.T. Wright. This project hopes to contribute to the movement towards the dramatising of theology.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Cortez, Marc. "Embodied souls, ensouled bodies : an exercise in christological anthropology and its significance for the mind/body debate ; with special reference to Karl Barth's 'Church dogmatics' III/2 /." Thesis, St Andrews, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/10023/145.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Aveline, Jean-Marc. "Pour une théologie christologique des religions : Tillich en débat avec Troeltsch." Doctoral thesis, Université Laval, 2001. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/51240.

Full text

Abstract:

La recherche effectuée pour cette thèse a pour but d’établir que c’est en développant, dans la Dogmatique de 1925, une interprétation christologique de l’histoire, interprétation dont l’objectif était de résoudre théologiquement, mais autrement que Barth, le problème posé par Troeltsch à partir de la critique, par l’histoire des religions, de la prétention du christia-nisme à l’absoluité, que Tillich a posé les fondements de sa réflexion future sur la rencontre du christianisme avec les religions. Dès lors, la réflexion élaborée dans les années soixante, loin de représenter un tournant dans la pensée de Tillich, comme on l’a trop souvent laissé entendre, suite aux déclarations de Mircea Eliade, en constitue plutôt l’un des fruits les plus mûrs, susceptible d’apporter une contribution à la fois originale et non encore entrevue, à la recherche contemporaine en théologie des religions

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Martin, Shirley Helen. "Freedom to obey : the obedience of Christ as the reflection of the obedience of the Son in Karl Barth's 'Church dogmatics'." Thesis, University of St Andrews, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10023/762.

Full text

Abstract:

This thesis argues that Barth’s asymmetrical structuring of the Trinity in I/1, his doctrine of election in volume II, his concept of the humanity of Christ as the imago Dei in III/2 and his account of the obedience of the Son being reflected in his incarnate life, as detailed in IV/1 and IV/2, are not just coherent but mutually reinforcing. The thesis demonstrates that Barth uses a nexus of crucial terms, including ‘correspondence’ [Entsprechung], ‘reflection’ [reflex/Abbildung] and ‘overflowing’ [Ueberstroemen], to express that God’s actions and relationships ad extra reveal who God is. The concept of ‘correspondence’, tentatively present in the first two volumes, gathers pace through III/2 and achieves full force in volume IV, where the obedience of Christ in IV/2 ‘reflects’ or ‘mirrors’ the obedience of the Son in IV/1. Crucially, the fact that the economic Trinity ‘reflects’ the immanent Trinity, or (differently stated) that the immanent Trinity ‘overflows’ into the economy, establishes a direction, an asymmetry, to the relationship of ‘correspondence’. In ch. II of the thesis we argue that the asymmetry developed in the doctrine of the Trinity in I/1 is the basis for this asymmetric correspondence. Barth describes the triune life as one of giving and receiving existence, suggesting a divine order with an irreversible direction, an asymmetric order. This is shown to be particularly evident in Barth’s defence of the filioque clause which enables him to claim that the Spirit is the one in whom the ruling Father and obedient Son are united ad intra. On this basis we argue, in ch. III, that, when Barth revises his doctrine of election, he comes to see it as the event of triune reflection: the Father, Son and Spirit electing to reflect who they are with a direction of determination, an asymmetry, which is irreversible. In this respect we argue against Bruce McCormack, who sees election as the event in which God elects triunity. In ch. IV we read Barth’s III/2 account of the humanity of Christ as the imago Die, as an attempt to demonstrate that God’s economy of salvation corresponds to who he is. This theme comes into full focus in the first two part-volumes of volume IV, explored here in ch. V. The obedience of Christ reflects, corresponds to, the obedience of the Son. There is obedience in God. This concept, which so mystifies Paul Molnar and Rowan Williams, is shown to be theologically consistent with a doctrine articulated by Barth some thirty years previously: his asymmetrically structured doctrine of the Trinity.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Kim, Young-Gwan 1967. "Karl Barth's reception in Korea : focusing on ecclesiology in relation to Korean Christian thought." Thesis, McGill University, 2001. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=38211.

Full text

Abstract:

The primary purpose of this thesis is to explore the reception of Karl Barth's theology in Korea by focusing specifically on his doctrine of the Church. This he describes as the gathering, upbuilding and sending of the Christian community. His work, Church Dogmatics, will be examined, and then an attempt will be made to identify how Barth's Christocentric ecclesiology was indigenized and is still received in Korea by examining Korean Christian thought. This will include an investigation of Sung-Bum Yun's theology of Sung.
The secondary purpose of this thesis is: (1) the description of a unique relationship between Christianity and Confucianism, because Korean Confucianism has played an important role in both the explosive growth of the Christian community and provided a basic foundation for the reception of Barth's theology in Korea; (2) the inquiry whether Barth's ecclesiology, especially his theology of mission (the sending of the Christian community), pays sufficient attention to different cultures and religions; and consequently (3) the justification that the indigenization of Barth's Christocentric theology was, and is, genuinely possible with Korean Confucianism, though Barth's theology is typically confined within the European context.
This thesis will be divided into three chapters. Chapter One is designed as a brief sketch of the historical development of early Korean Protestantism and its impact on cultural and religious changes in Korea. This will include a detailed introduction to Korean Confucianism and its community concept and structure.
In the second chapter, an analysis of Barth's ecclesiology is presented by providing a discussion of what constitutes the true church, the upbuilding of the Christian community, and the missionary task of the Christian community.
Chapter Three indicates why Barth's Christocentric ecclesiology can still make an impact on contemporary Korean ecclesiological theology and practice, by exploring a specific overview of the Korean reception of Barth's theology. On this basis, this chapter critically examines and analyzes Sung-Bum Yun's appropriation and misappropriation of Barth's theology.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Wu, Kuo-An. "Concept of history in the theology of Karl Barth." Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/5457.

Full text

Abstract:

This thesis provides a complete, chronological view of Barth’s concept of history throughout his theological career. The purpose of undertaking this hitherto unattempted task is to demonstrate that, ever since his full engagement with dogmatics in the mid-1920s, Barth has unequivocally affirmed the reality of the history which revelation becomes and is. Though he continues to insist upon the transcendence of revelation, he does so by way of an increasingly christocentric theology, so that both divine sovereignty and human dignity are firmly upheld. This is especially evident in his later theology, with his concentration on the history of Jesus Christ on the basis of the doctrine of election. This thesis thus rejects both the charge that Barth’s theology is ahistorical or anti-historical on the one hand, and the charge that it is excessively historical on the other.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Yuen, Alfred H. "Barth's theological ontology of Holy Scripture." Thesis, University of Aberdeen, 2011. http://digitool.abdn.ac.uk:80/webclient/DeliveryManager?pid=183701.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Books on the topic "Barth, Karl (1886-1968) – Religion"

1

Busch, Eberhard. The great passion: An introduction to Karl Barth's theology. Grand Rapids, Mich: William B. Eerdmans Pub., 2010.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Barth. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2008.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Sudhoff, Karl. Ökumenische Bewegung "unter der Abwesenheit Israels"?: Karl Barth (1886-1968) : Bünder Vorträge 2004 und Beigaben. Bünde: Karl Barth-Gesellschaft, 2005.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Piety and responsibility: Patterns of unity in Karl Rahner, Karl Barth, and Vedanta Deshika. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate Pub., 2011.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

How to read Karl Barth: The shape of his theology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Wang Yang-ming and Karl Barth: A Confucian-Christian dialogue. Lanham, Md: University Press of America, 1996.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Macken, John. The autonomy theme in the Church dogmatics: Karl Barth and his critics. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

The autonomy theme in the Church dogmatics: Karl Barth and his critics. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Revelation and theology: The knowledge of God in Balthasar and Barth. Bern: P. Lang, 1999.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

The hastening that waits: Karl Barth's ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Barth, Karl (1886-1968) – Religion"

1

Webb, Stephen H. "Karl Barth (1886-1968)." In The Student's Companion to the Theologians, 250–55. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118427170.ch34.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

"Definitive Exclusivism: Karl Barth (1886–1968)." In Twentieth Century Christian Responses to Religious Pluralism, 25–41. Routledge, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315549521-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

"Karl Barth: 1886–1968." In Twentieth-Century Theologians. I.B.Tauris, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780755626250.ch-006.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

"Karl Barth (1886–1968)." In The Challenge of History, 197–202. 1517 Media, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvp2n4cv.34.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

"Karl Barth (1886–1968)." In A Reader in Ecclesiology, 177–80. Routledge, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315565118-68.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Rigby, Cynthia L. "Karl Barth (1886-1968)." In Empire and the Christian Tradition, 337–52. Fortress Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1hqdj3m.29.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Lienemann, Wolfgang. "Christlicher Pazifismus. Zum Beispiel Karl Barth (1886–1968)." In Christlich-theologischer Pazifismus im 20. Jahrhundert, 113–40. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845276588-113.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Nimmo, Paul T. "The Influence of Barth in Scotland." In The History of Scottish Theology, Volume III, 146–60. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198759355.003.0011.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter investigates the influence of the Swiss pastor and academic Karl Barth (1886–1968) upon three important Scottish theologians active in the twentieth century: John McConnachie (1875–1948), H. R. Mackintosh (1870–1936), and T. F. Torrance (1913–2007). Each of these thinkers bears a measure of responsibility for Barth becoming a central conversation partner for theology in Scotland from 1930 onwards, although each had a rather different relationship to his work. This chapter exposits the influence of Barth upon each theologian in detail, attending to their significant publications on Barth as well as to wider contextual factors. It concludes by offering one possible reason for the different influences of Barth upon each of their work and a brief reflection upon the ongoing influence of Barth in Scotland.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!