Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Beall's list

Contents

Journal articles

Academic literature on the topic 'Beall's list'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2025

Last updated: 23 June 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Beall's list.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Beall's list"

1

Pahor, Dušica. "Predatory journals / Plenilske revije." Acta Medico-Biotechnica 9, no. 1 (2021): 7–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.18690/actabiomed.126.

Full text

Abstract:

The name “predatory open access” was first used by Jeffrey Beall, researcher and librarian at the University of Colorado at Denver, to describe journals for profits and not for the promotion of scientific data. In 2010, he published the first list of predatory publishers. Beall's list includes potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers. Predatory practice includes not only journals, but also monographs, conferences and conference proceedings (1).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Kakamad, Fahmi H., Berun A. Abdalla, Hiwa O. Abdullah, et al. "Lists of predatory journals and publishers: a review for future refinement." European Science Editing 50 (May 17, 2024): e118119. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2024.e118119.

Full text

Abstract:

Although predatory publishers are increasingly recognized, universally accepted criteria for defining predatory journals are lacking. These journals challenge the scholarly community by blurring the line between legitimate and questionable publishing practices. Several lists and reports of predatory journals have been published, which offer valuable insights; however, they are not devoid of criticism. Beall's list, although criticized for its inclusion criteria, is currently managed anony-mously and updated infrequently. Cabells' list uses an extensive array of inclusion criteria, some of which are similar to those used in Beall's list. Several of these cri-teria are redundant and fail to detect predatory practices, and using all of them in evaluating a journal is seldom practicable. Kscien's list has emerged as a promising alternative for identifying predatory publishers or journals. However, it requires refinement, potentially through creating a distinct list supported by unequivocal evidence, such as accepting a fake manuscript (ascertained through a sting opera-tion). The present review seeks to catalyze research on identifying predatory jour-nals and publishers by comparing existing lists and suggesting new techniques for detecting predatory practices.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Strielkowski, Wadim. "Predatory journals: Beall's List is missed." Nature 544, no. 7651 (2017): 416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/544416b.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Banerjee, Amitav. "Beall's list vanishes into the blue… what next?" Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University 10, no. 3 (2017): 219. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_21_17.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Strielkowski, Wadim. "Setting New Publishing Standards after the Beall's List." International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 9, no. 2 (2018): 108–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijoem.2018.1314.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Watson, Roger. "Beall's list of predatory open access journals: RIP." Nursing Open 4, no. 2 (2017): 60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.78.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Strielkowski, Wadim. "Predatory Publishing: What Are the Alternatives to Beall's List?" American Journal of Medicine 131, no. 4 (2018): 333–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.10.054.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Mimouni, Michael, Eyal Braun, Francis B. Mimouni, Daniel Mimouni, and Eytan Z. Blumenthal. "Beall's List Removed: What Stands Between Us and Open Access Predators?" American Journal of Medicine 130, no. 8 (2017): e371-e372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.03.040.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Schlomi, Mattan, Suzy Myers Joy, and Risa Shimizu Joy. "Sedation and Twilight Anesthesia Induced by Ascofregata Purin Song." American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research 6, no. 4 (2019): 316–18. https://doi.org/10.34297/AJBSR.2019.06.001051.

Full text

Abstract:

The "American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research" is, despite its appearances, a predatory journal that does not practice peer review. They will accept any paper submitted to them, and charge over US$1000 for publication charges. As evidence, here is a paper about the Pokémon "Jigglypuff" that repeatedly drops hits about its own, fictional nature, yet failed to raise any flags during the 'review' stage and was accepted and published within days of submission. Some of the emails sent by the publisher are attached as well.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

KC, Sajan, Surendra Pariyar, and Anisha Sapkota. "Refining Nepal's butterfly records: self-corrections and notes on previously recorded Papilionoidea (Lepidoptera) species." Journal of Insect Biodiversity and Systematics 11, no. 2 (2025): 363–77. https://doi.org/10.61186/jibs.11.2.363.

Full text

Abstract:

Accurate documentation and identification of species, along with publishing findings in peer-reviewed sources, are essential for enhancing biodiversity knowledge and guiding conservation efforts effectively. In this paper, we present corrections to records of butterfly species we previously documented from Nepal, updating their identifications based on new information. The records of three misidentified species are corrected: <em>Caltoris sirius sirius </em>(Evans, 1926), <em>Catochrysops panormus exiguus</em> (Distant, 1886), and <em>Pelopidas conjuncta narooa </em>Moore, 1878. Additionally, we have revalidated the records for four species: <em>Caltoris bromus bromus </em>(Leech, 1894), <em>Celaenorrhinus nigricans nigricans </em>(de Nicéville, 1885), <em>Nacaduba berenice plumbeomicans </em>(Wood-Mason & de Nicéville, 1881),<em> Pantoporia sandaka davidsoni </em>Eliot, 1969, and one form, <em>Danaus chrysippus chrysippus</em> (Linnaeus, 1758) f. <em>alcippoides</em> (Moore, 1883), which were previously reported in journals listed on Beall's list of potential predatory journals, to ensure their authenticity. Our goal is to provide a reliable, corrected, and authoritative reference source for these records, enhancing the accuracy of butterfly species documentation in Nepal.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!