Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Beneficial arthropods

Contents

Journal articles
Dissertations / Theses
Books
Book chapters
Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Beneficial arthropods'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 9 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Beneficial arthropods.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Beneficial arthropods"

1

Paudel, A., and S. Tiwari. "Abundance and Diversity of Soil Arthropods in Different Habitats in Chitwan Nepal." Journal of the Plant Protection Society 7, no. 01 (August 8, 2022): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jpps.v7i01.47299.

Full text

Abstract:

Arthropod diversity is generally influenced by the type of habitat in an agro-ecosystem. Crop diversity, soil types, nature of habitats (intensive, semi-intensive and natural), proximity to natural habitats, landscape complexity etc. are the major arthropod diversity influencing factors. Hence, this study was designed to investigate the diversity of various arthropod species among different habitats such as mango orchard, litchi orchard, vegetable field, organic field and uncultivated land during March 2021. Arthropod sampling was taken on every three- day interval using pitfall trap. The composition, relative abundance, and diversity indices of the arthropods of five different habitats were analyzed. Maximum abundance was recorded in uncultivated land (N = 398) and minimum in the vegetable field (N = 61). Shannon-Weiner Diversity Index (1.76) and species richness (9.67) were found highest in mango orchards. The greatest evenness was recorded in the vegetable field (0.91) and more dominance index was recorded in uncultivated land (0.60). There was a significant difference in total abundances of arthropods between vegetable fields than in the organic and uncultivated fields, being highest in uncultivated land followed by litchi, mango and organic field. Hymenopterans were the most abundant order (53.55%) followed by Coleoptera and Arachnida. These arthropods were crop pests and beneficial. Beneficial arthropods population was more than crop pests. Such beneficial arthropods play a vital role to deliver an ecosystem service. This study can help to develop a conservation and management protocol for beneficial arthropods in the agro-ecosystem.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

McCravy, Kenneth. "A Review of Sampling and Monitoring Methods for Beneficial Arthropods in Agroecosystems." Insects 9, no. 4 (November 23, 2018): 170. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects9040170.

Full text

Abstract:

Beneficial arthropods provide many important ecosystem services. In agroecosystems, pollination and control of crop pests provide benefits worth billions of dollars annually. Effective sampling and monitoring of these beneficial arthropods is essential for ensuring their short- and long-term viability and effectiveness. There are numerous methods available for sampling beneficial arthropods in a variety of habitats, and these methods can vary in efficiency and effectiveness. In this paper I review active and passive sampling methods for non-Apis bees and arthropod natural enemies of agricultural pests, including methods for sampling flying insects, arthropods on vegetation and in soil and litter environments, and estimation of predation and parasitism rates. Sample sizes, lethal sampling, and the potential usefulness of bycatch are also discussed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Franin, Kristijan, Božena Barić, and Gabrijela Kuštera. "The role of ecological infrastructure on beneficial arthropods in vineyards." Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 14, no. 1 (March 2, 2016): e0303. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2016141-7371.

Full text

Abstract:

Weeds and non-cultivated plants have a great impact on abundance and diversity of beneficial arthropods in agriculture. The main aim of this work was to study the influence of the ecological infrastructure (meadows and weedy margins) on the arthropod composition in vineyard surrounding landscape. Research was carried out from May to October during three years. Sampling took place in the ecological infrastructure of three differently managed vineyards (organic, integrated and extensive). Three zones were chosen in each vineyard (3 m, 10 m, and 30 m from the edge of the vineyard). Samples were taken using a standardised sweep net method. In total, we captured 6032 spiders and 1309 insects belonging to 4 orders and 10 families. Arthropod fauna was numerically dominated by Aranea (82.1%); among insects, Coleoptera was the most abundant taxonomic group (10.6%); Neuroptera showed the lowest value (0.88%). Significant differences were found between sites and zones. Organic vineyard showed the highest abundance of arthropods (92.41% were spiders) and in the integrated vineyard there was a 23% of insects. Both the highest abundance of arthropods and the highest Shannon Index value (2.46) was found 3 m away from the edge of the vineyard. Results showed that spiders were the dominant arthropods and ladybugs the dominant insects. Weedy strips near the edge of the vineyard contained a high number of insects and spiders. Our results support the importance of weedy margins in enhancing the population of arthropods as well as in biodiversity promotion. Well-managed field margins could play important role in biological control of vineyard pests.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Cardona-Rivera, Gabriela A., Brittany Clark, Joseph V. McHugh, Bryana Bush, and Darold P. Batzer. "Wetlands Provide a Source of Arthropods Beneficial to Agriculture: A Case Study from Central Georgia, USA." Journal of Entomological Science 56, no. 3 (July 1, 2021): 424–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.18474/jes20-61.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract We described the overlap of arthropod communities between agricultural lands and adjacent wetlands using transect sampling, to determine if these juxtapositions might be influencing abundances of beneficial arthropods in agricultural lands. We further assessed experimentally whether these beneficial arthropods migrating from wetlands may potentially enhance crop productivity. Large numbers of predaceous carabid beetles and spiders moved from the wetlands into the agricultural lands; both of these groups can be important to biological control of crop pests. However, our exclusion experiments did not detect significant impacts of these predators on herbivorous insects or on crop productivity. Numerous studies have established that natural habitats adjacent to crop lands serve as refuge to beneficial arthropod communities and enhance overall biodiversity. Wetlands adjacent to agricultural lands appear to serve the same function. Our study suggests that wetlands may provide the ecosystem service of enhancing numbers of arthropods beneficial to agriculture, a service not established previously, and a factor that may motivate farmers to conserve wetlands that they own.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Shiferaw, A., M. W. Smith, R. D. Eikenbary, and Don C. Arnold. "Legume Ground Covers for Low-input Pecan Management." HortScience 30, no. 4 (July 1995): 893F—893. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.30.4.893f.

Full text

Abstract:

Perennial legume ground covers were evaluated to supply N and increase beneficial arthropod densities in pecan orchards. Treatments were pure stands and a mixture of `Kenland' red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) and `Louisiana S-l' white clover (Trifolium repense L.). The control plot was a grass sod. Nitrogen was applied at 0 to 200 kg·ha–1 in 50-kg intervals to the trees in the grass plots, but no N was applied to the legume plots. Aphids and beneficial arthropods were monitored in legumes and pecan canopies. Beneficial arthropods monitored were Coccinellidae, Chrysopidae, Nabis, Syrphid, and spiders. The most abundant beneficial arthropods were spiders, Coccinellidae, Chrysopidae, and Nabis respectively. In pecan canopies, spiders, Coccinellidae, Chrysopidae were the most abundant. The legumes supplied ≤156 kg N/ha to the pecan trees.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Stewart, Colin D., S. Kristine Braman, and Beverly L. Sparks. "Abundance of Beneficial Arthropods on Woody Landscape Plants at Professionally-Managed Landscape Sites." Journal of Environmental Horticulture 20, no. 2 (June 1, 2002): 67–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-20.2.67.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Eight 0.2–0.4 ha (0.5–1.0 A) sites managed by landscape professionals were monitored biweekly for beneficial arthropod activity. More than 30 generalist predator taxa were identified. Spiders and green lacewings were the most numerous taxa and both were found on all plant taxa sampled. Green lacewings, especially the egg stage, were the most numerous natural enemies detected on birch, crape myrtle, cherry, and oak trees accounting for 52.5, 49.9, 43.5, and 38.1%, respectively. Spiders accounted for 56.2% of the insectivorous arthropods observed on magnolia and were the most abundant predatory arthropod on azaleas comprising 46.5% of all arthropod predators/parasites across all properties. The most abundant predatory arthropods on junipers were spiders accounting for 75.5% of the beneficials encountered with ants (associated with an early season aphid outbreak), green lacewing larvae, lady beetles, harvestmen, and parasitic wasps comprising 15.8, 0.4, 4.3, 0.4, and 1.2%, respectively. Spiders were the most abundant predators on boxwood accounting for 70.6% of the natural enemies.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Carmona, Gabriela Inveninato, Emily Robinson, Julia Nogueira Duarte Campos, and Anthony Justin McMechan. "Impact of the Timing and Use of an Insecticide on Arthropods in Cover-Crop-Corn Systems." Insects 13, no. 4 (March 31, 2022): 348. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects13040348.

Full text

Abstract:

Cover crops provide a habitat for pests and beneficial arthropods. Unexpected pest pressure in a cover-crop-to-corn system can occur and result in increased use of insecticides. Eight site-years of on-farm field studies were conducted in 2019, 2020, and 2021. The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of insecticide timing relative to cover-crop termination on arthropod activity in a cover-crop-to-corn system. The treatments consisted of (i) glyphosate to terminate the cover crop, (ii) glyphosate and pyrethroid tank mix to terminate the cover crop, and (iii) glyphosate to terminate the cover crop and pyrethroid application 25 days after the termination. Arthropod activity was measured with pitfall traps before and at each treatment application. A total of 33,316 arthropods were collected. Total arthropods, Collembola, and Aphididae were the only taxa reduced with an insecticide application. The other arthropod taxa were mainly influenced by the sampling period. No significant pest pressure occurred at any site-year. Insecticide applications are not generally needed in a cover-crop-to-corn system. Scouting for pests and applying strategies only when necessary is crucial to conserve potentially beneficial arthropods in the system.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Reng-Moss, Tiffany, Frederick Baxendale, and Terrance Riordan. "Beneficial Arthropods Associated with Buffalograss." Journal of Economic Entomology 91, no. 5 (October 1, 1998): 1167–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jee/91.5.1167.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Vankosky, M. A., H. A. Cárcamo, H. A. Catton, A. C. Costamagna, and R. De Clerck-Floate. "Impacts of the agricultural transformation of the Canadian Prairies on grassland arthropods." Canadian Entomologist 149, no. 6 (October 6, 2017): 718–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.4039/tce.2017.47.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThe prairie grasslands have been transformed to become the primary source of agricultural production in Canada. Soon after its establishment, the Biological Survey of Canada recognised the urgent need to document the arthropods of the prairie grasslands, especially in the few pristine remnants. Although this initiative has yielded considerable progress in documenting the species present in the Prairies Ecozone, comprehensive ecological studies are sparse. Landscape effects on arthropods are well studied elsewhere, but no equivalent studies have been published for the Canadian Prairies. Crop rotation varies landscape composition annually, changes host plant resources in fields, and interacts with other agricultural inputs to disturb pest and beneficial arthropods. Despite only a handful of studies on grazing, there is an emerging pattern: moderate grazing increases arthropod diversity and benefits certain arthropod guilds. Abiotic inputs elicit variable responses from different arthropod taxa; Carabidae (Coleoptera) are best studied, with some information available for ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and aquatic arthropods. Biotic inputs include arthropods released for biocontrol of weed and insect pests; evidence indicates that biocontrol agents of insects have a greater potential for impact on native communities of arthropods. The studies reviewed here reveal important trends and research gaps to be addressed in the future.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Zanettin, Giulia, Angela Bullo, Alberto Pozzebon, Giovanni Burgio, and Carlo Duso. "Influence of Vineyard Inter-Row Groundcover Vegetation Management on Arthropod Assemblages in the Vineyards of North-Eastern Italy." Insects 12, no. 4 (April 14, 2021): 349. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects12040349.

Full text

Abstract:

In this study, the effects of habitat management practices on both pests and beneficial arthropods were evaluated in vineyards of North-eastern Italy through different field experiments: (1) mowing of inter-row spontaneous grasses in conventional and organic vineyards, (2) different timing of mowing of a green manure mixture, and (3) comparing different green manure mixtures. The first experiment followed a split-plot design, while randomized block design was used in the second and third experiment. In each experiment arthropods were sampled using different methods: leaf sampling, beating and sweep net sampling. Non-mowed spontaneous grasses in inter-rows of vineyards favored the abundance of natural enemies (e.g., predatory mites, parasitic wasps and spiders), and sometimes grapevine leafhoppers. Many arthropod species were recorded in higher numbers in organic vineyards. Late mowing of green manure favored beneficial arthropods (e.g., spiders and parasitic wasps), while it did not influence herbivore density. Groundcover management practices, aimed at increasing plant biodiversity in vineyards, could be a useful tool to enhance beneficial arthropod abundance, although the adoption of this practice should be carefully evaluated when pests occur. Semi-natural areas can contribute to create a more pest-stable agro-ecosystem and should be integrated with appropriate ecological infrastructures surrounding vineyards.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Beneficial arthropods"

1

Macleod, Alan. "Provision of plant resources for beneficial arthropods in arable ecosystems." Thesis, University of Southampton, 1994. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.295872.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Pinch, Catherine. "Sub-lethal effects of pesticides in beneficial arthropods in cereal crops." Thesis, Imperial College London, 2003. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.404739.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Harwood, Robert William John. "The management of arable field margins to enhance natural populations of beneficial arthropods." Thesis, University of Southampton, 1994. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.307086.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Lami, Francesco. "Bridging applied ecology and network theory to improve landscape management for conservation." Doctoral thesis, Università degli studi di Padova, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11577/3423178.

Full text

Abstract:

Agricultural intensification is widely considered a major threat to biodiversity and ecosystem services. To better protect biological communities, it is necessary to gain a more detailed understanding of the way species use habitats and move across increasingly simplified landscapes. Traditional landscape ecology approaches are mainly based on the dichotomy between focal semi-natural habitat patches and the surrounding agricultural matrix. While the advances made possible by the landscape mosaic model are undeniable, this approach fails to account for real-world complexity, as many species are known to use multiple habitat types (natural and disturbed) during their life cycle. In addition to landscape changes, many local factors (including management such as soil disturbance or pest control) can impact biodiversity, often interacting with each other. In order to inform efficient biodiversity management actions in the future, it is crucial to increase our knowledge on the way local and landscape factors can impact biodiversity at multiple spatial scales. The general aim of this thesis was to develop a novel approach to the study of species-habitat interactions, and to apply the approach to answer some pressing questions about the way landscape simplification influences important arthropod functional groups. Additionally, we studied the effects of local factors on an arthropodmediated ecosystem service (weed seed predation) in the same area. Arthropods were chosen as they are among the most abundant and ecologically relevant organisms in agroecosystems, providing a wide variety of pivotal services. The new approach, based on network theory, showed that landscape simplification reduces habitat specialization in low-mobility insect groups, and allowed us to pinpoint the most important habitat types for the facilitation of arthropod movement through the landscape mosaics. Our local-level study, on the other hand, highlighted how multiple factors can interact in a complex way in shaping ecosystem services. This study demonstrates the potential of the novel species-habitat network approach as a complementary tool for investigating landscape-biodiversity interactions, while simultaneously unveiling new information on the way landscape changes and local factors influence key arthropod groups. This enabled us to provide a series of recommendations for biodiversity management actions, varying depending on the target group. Overall, our research is a reminder of the importance of taking into account multiple potentially interacting factors at different spatial scales to correctly understand and manage biodiversity-related processes.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Dobson, C. M. "Insecticides from sprayers and the effect on beneficial arthropodes in winter wheat." Thesis, Imperial College London, 1986. http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/37994.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Alford, James. "Optimising insecticide spray placement in cereal crops by minimising beneficial arthropod exposure." Thesis, University of Southampton, 2002. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.395888.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Mahat, Kiran. "Effects on Attraction, Feeding and Mortality of Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera:Tephritidae) and Beneficial Organisms with Protein Bait-Insecticide Mixtures." Thesis, Griffith University, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367286.

Full text

Abstract:

This thesis examines the effects of malathion, chlorpyrifos, fipronil and spinosad mixed in fruit fly protein bait on attraction, feeding and mortality of the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt). The effects of weathering of the protein bait-insecticide mixtures on the mortality of B. tryoni were also measured along with attraction, feeding response and toxicity of the protein bait sprays on important arthropod natural enemies particularly the red scale parasitic wasps, Aphytis lingnanensis (Compere) and Comperiella bifasciata (Howard), the green lace wing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) and the mealy bug predator, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Mulsant). In field cage experiments, protein-starved male B. tryoni showed the same level of attraction to protein baits mixed with malathion, chlorpyrifos, fipronil, spinosad and protein alone used as the control. However, protein-starved females elicited a difference in attraction with protein baits containing chlorpyrifos and spinosad. Traps with spinosad bait mixtures captured significantly more females compared to traps containing chlorpyrifos bait mixtures. Laboratory feeding experiments on protein-starved female flies demonstrated that baits containing malathion and chlorpyrifos deterred flies from feeding on them. In contrast, no such deterrence was detected with baits containing spinosad, fipronil and protein alone. These results demonstrated that the type of toxicant mixed with protein bait sprays can influence the attraction and feeding responses of B. tryoni. Therefore the process of screening toxicants for use in protein bait mixtures is important and should entail field and laboratory tests. In terms of toxicity, protein baits mixed with malathion and chlorpyrifos caused significantly higher fly mortality and demonstrated a more rapid fly knock down than did spinosad, fipronil and protein alone as the control. Spinosad however was a slow acting toxicant, causing a gradual increase in fly mortality over time. Fly mortality obtained with protein bait mixtures containing malathion, chlorpyrifos and fipronil, applied on citrus leaves, and weathered out doors for up to 6 days did not vary significantly from freshly applied baits. However, the residual effectiveness of bait mixed with spinosad waned significantly after 3 days of out door weathering. Fly mortality caused by 3 day aged spinosad bait mixture was significantly lower than fresh bait mixtures, suggesting a rapid break down of spinosad under field conditions. The parasitism rates of the two most important parasitoids of red scales, A. lingnanensis and C. bifasciata, measured before and after commencement of fruit fly bait spraying in two commercial citrus orchards, did not show any significant negative trend. Aphytis were not attracted to Pinnacle protein, the most commonly used fruit fly protein lure in Australia. A significantly higher number of Aphytis were attracted to honey solution and protein bait mixed with 20% sugar, compared to protein bait alone. A no-choice test further confirmed this result, demonstrating no difference in attraction between protein and water. Protein bait containing malathion, chlorpyrifos, fipronil, and spinosad, fresh and weathered for up to 12 days, caused high mortality in Aphytis. In contrast protein bait mixed with spinosad caused a lower Aphytis mortality after 12 days out door weathering, compared to chlorpyrifos bait mixture. However, for other weathering periods, no such differences in mortality between the treatments were observed. In addition, the parasitizing capacity of Aphytis, after being exposed to these weathered residues, was reduced. Except for the control, aged bait mixtures significantly reduced the fecundity of Aphytis. Therefore, while integrating chemical based field control along with bio-control agents, appropriate measures should be in place to reduce the negative impacts of toxic residues. Overall, the findings from this study indicate that spinosad is a suitable alternative to the older toxicants, for incorporation into fruit fly protein baits. Moreover, fruit fly protein baits in the field are less likely to disrupt the activites of important natural enemies. However, chemical-based control of insect pests in a cropping system should be designed carefully with the objective to prevent potential harm to susceptible biological control agents such as Aphytis.
Thesis (Masters)
Master of Philosophy (MPhil)
Griffith School of Environment
Faculty of Science, Environment, Engineering and Technology
Full Text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Phillips, Benjamin W. "The Ecological Impacts of Non-Native Annual and Native Perennial Floral Insectaries on Beneficial Insect Activity Density and Arthropod-Mediated Ecosystem Services Within Ohio Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) Agroecosystems." The Ohio State University, 2013. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1374181106.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Maas, Bea. "Birds, bats and arthropods in tropical agroforestry landscapes: Functional diversity, multitrophic interactions and crop yield." Doctoral thesis, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-1735-0000-0022-5E77-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Beneficial arthropods"

1

Margery, Facklam, ed. Insects. New York: Twenty-First Century Books, 1994.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Ben-Yakir, David, ed. Optical manipulation of arthropod pests and beneficials. Wallingford: CABI, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781786394705.0000.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Gill, Stanton. Ball identification guide to greenhouse pests and beneficials. Batavia, Ill: Ball Publ., 1998.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Hunter, Charles D. Suppliers of beneficial organisms in North America. Sacramento, Calif. (1020 N St., Sacramento 95814-5604): California Environmental Protection Agency, Dept. of Pesticide Regulation, Environmental Monitoring and Pest Management Branch, 1997.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Hunter, Charles D. Suppliers of beneficial organisms in North America. Sacramento, Calif. (1020 N St., Sacramento 95814-5604): California Environmental Protection Agency, Dept. of Pesticide Regulation, Environmental Monitoring and Pest Management Branch, 1994.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

P, Parra José Roberto, ed. Controle biológico no Brasil: Parasitóides e predadores. Barueri, SP, Brasil: Manole, 2002.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Den'en kankyō no gaichū, ekichū seitai zukan: Guide to pest arthropods and beneficials in Japanese field. Tōkyō-to Minato-ku: Hokuryūkan, 2012.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Ranz, Ramón Eduardo Rebolledo. Arthropods: Are They Beneficial for Mankind? Intechopen, 2021.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Ben-Yakir, David, Antoine Abrieux, Joanna C. Chiu, Joseph E. Funderbunk, and Daphna Gottlieb. Optical Manipulation of Pests and Beneficial Arthropods. CABI, 2020.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Annette Herz. Alternative flowering crops as potential food sources for beneficial arthropods. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1399/jfk.2017.03.01.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Beneficial arthropods"

1

Shires, Stephen W. "Pesticides and beneficial arthropods: an industry perspective." In Ecotoxicology, 241–47. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5791-3_25.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

van der Valk, Harold. "The impact of locust and grasshopper control on beneficial arthropods in West Africa." In Ecotoxicology, 372–80. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5791-3_40.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Raguraman, S., and M. Kannan. "Non-target Effects of Botanicals on Beneficial Arthropods with Special Reference to Azadirachta indica." In Advances in Plant Biopesticides, 173–205. New Delhi: Springer India, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2006-0_10.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Binisha, K. V., Haseena Bhaskar, and Sosamma Jacob. "Diversity of Mites on Vegetable Crops, Kerala, South India: Documentation for Conserving Predatory and Other Beneficial Mites on Vegetables." In Economic and Ecological Significance of Arthropods in Diversified Ecosystems, 257–69. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1524-3_13.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

van der Valk, H., and A. Niassy. "Side-effects of locust control on beneficial arthropods: research approaches used by the Locustox project in Senegal." In New Strategies in Locust Control, 337–44. Basel: Birkhäuser Basel, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-9202-5_50.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Ben-Yakir, David, Un Taek Lim, and Gábor Horváth. "Arthropod vision." In Optical manipulation of arthropod pests and beneficials, 19–48. Wallingford: CABI, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781786394705.0019.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Lev-Yadun, Simcha, and David Ben-Yakir. "Visual interactions between plants and arthropods." In Optical manipulation of arthropod pests and beneficials, 60–75. Wallingford: CABI, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781786394705.0060.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Shimoda, Masami, and David Ben-Yakir. "Attraction of beneficials." In Optical manipulation of arthropod pests and beneficials, 141–47. Wallingford: CABI, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781786394705.0141.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Ben-Yakir, David. "Introduction and summaries of chapters." In Optical manipulation of arthropod pests and beneficials, 1–9. Wallingford: CABI, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781786394705.0001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Ben-Yakir, David, and Gábor Horváth. "Light in the agricultural environment." In Optical manipulation of arthropod pests and beneficials, 10–18. Wallingford: CABI, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781786394705.0010.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Beneficial arthropods"

1

Ohnesorg, Wayne J. "Effect of haying regime on beneficial arthropods in prairie hay." In 2016 International Congress of Entomology. Entomological Society of America, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/ice.2016.115200.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Eliseev, Serghei, Victoria Sumencova, and Elena Iordosopol. "Several ecological aspects of the hymenoptera complex in a plum orchard (II)." In International Scientific Symposium "Plant Protection – Achievements and Prospects". Institute of Genetics, Physiology and Plant Protection, Republic of Moldova, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.53040/9789975347204.05.

Full text

Abstract:

The present paper treats several ecological peculiarities of the hymenopteran complex in a plum orchard. The intense flight activity for Hymenoptera complex was observed in the second half of the vegetation season starting from the first decade of August as a result of stopping phytopharmaceutical treatments. The most number of specimens was registered in four families. Parasitoids ocuppy 89.0% out of all Hymenoptera, being of great importance for plant protection. Hymenoptera form 21.0% out of total plum canopy fauna number in 2017. They occupy the second place in total fauna number. The percentage of Hymenoptera out of total arthropods’ number is 66.0%, the rest beneficial mesofauna has just 34.0% in 2017.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Pretorius, Johan, Jeff Bradshaw, and Gary Hein. "SEASONAL FLUCTUATIONS IN THE BENEFICIAL ARTHROPOD COMPLEX ASSOCIATED WITH CONVENTIONAL TILLED AND ZONE TILLED SUGAR BEETS." In 37th Biennial Meeting of American Society of Sugarbeet Technologist. ASSBT, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.5274/assbt.2013.49.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Papadopoulos, Nikos T. "Toxic and beneficial effects of plant essential oils on arthropod pests lead to novel control methods." In 2016 International Congress of Entomology. Entomological Society of America, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/ice.2016.93047.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!