Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Bioenergy policy / Books

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Bioenergy policy.

Books on the topic 'Bioenergy policy'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 4 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 21 books for your research on the topic 'Bioenergy policy.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Jürgen, Scheffran, Zilberman David 1947-, and SpringerLink (Online service), eds. Handbook of Bioenergy Economics and Policy. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2010.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Khanna, Madhu, Jürgen Scheffran, and David Zilberman, eds. Handbook of Bioenergy Economics and Policy. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0369-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Purkus, Alexandra. Concepts and Instruments for a Rational Bioenergy Policy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31135-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Khanna, Madhu, and David Zilberman, eds. Handbook of Bioenergy Economics and Policy: Volume II. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6906-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Quinn, L. D., D. P. Matlaga, and J. N. Barney, eds. Bioenergy and biological invasions: ecological, agronomic and policy perspectives on minimising risk. Wallingford: CABI, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781780643304.0000.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Engineering, National Academy of, National Academies Press (U.S.), and National Research Council (U.S.). Panel on Alternative Liquid Transportation Fuels, eds. Liquid transportation fuels from coal and biomass: Technological status, costs, and environmental impacts. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press, 2009.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Khanna, Madhu, David Zilberman, and Jürgen Scheffran. Handbook of Bioenergy Economics and Policy. Springer, 2012.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Quinn, Lauren D., David P. Matlaga, and Jacob N. Barney. Bioenergy and Biological Invasions: Ecological, Agronomic, and Policy Perspectives on Minimising Risk. CABI, 2015.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Rutz, Dominik, and Rainer Janssen. Bioenergy for Sustainable Development in Africa. Springer, 2011.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Bioenergy For Sustainable Development In Africa. Springer, 2011.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Rutz, Dominik, and Rainer Janssen. Bioenergy for Sustainable Development in Africa. Springer, 2014.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Charlotta, Jull, and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Development Law Service., eds. Recent trends in the law and policy of bioenergy production, promotion and use. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2007.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Kere, Éric Nazindigouba. Do Political Economy Factors Matter in Explaining the Increase in the Production of Bioenergy? Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198802242.003.0009.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter analyses the impact of political economy factors on the production of bioenergy. The authors theoretically and empirically show that the quality of governance and environmental policy stringency instruments promote the development of bioenergy production. The authors also find that the factors that favour oil production and renewable energy negatively influence the development of bioenergy, whereas the conditions of production (cereal yield) and demand factors (gross domestic product, population density, and urbanization) tend to favour the production of bioenergy. Bioenergies are not a magic solution but can contribute to the fight against global warming and poverty in developing countries. Therefore national efforts should be made to attract more investors in this area, including: (i) energy policies, research and innovation to reduce production costs, (iv) promoting the development of the application, and (v) providing a basis for learning more about the development of viable and sustainable bioenergy models.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Khanna, Madhu, and David Zilberman. Handbook of Bioenergy Economics and Policy : Volume II: Modeling Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Implications. Springer, 2017.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Khanna, Madhu, and David Zilberman. Handbook of Bioenergy Economics and Policy : Volume II: Modeling Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Implications. Springer, 2018.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

1941-, Richardson J., ed. Bioenergy from sustainable forestry: Guiding principles and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2002.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Fraundorfer, M. Brazil’s Emerging Role in Global Governance: Health, Food Security and Bioenergy. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Bracco, Stefania. Economics of Biofuels: The Impact of EU Bioenergy Policy on Agricultural Markets and Land Grabbing in Africa. Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Economics of Biofuels: The Impact of EU Bioenergy Policy on Agricultural Markets and Land Grabbing in Africa. Taylor & Francis Group, 2016.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

(Editor), J. Richardson, R. Björheden (Editor), P. Hakkila (Editor), A. T. Lowe (Editor), and C. T. Smith (Editor), eds. Bioenergy from Sustainable Forestry: Guiding Principles and Practice (Forestry Sciences). Springer, 2002.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Fuss, Sabine. The 1.5°C Target, Political Implications, and the Role of BECCS. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.585.

Full text

Abstract:

The 2°C target for global warming had been under severe scrutiny in the run-up to the climate negotiations in Paris in 2015 (COP21). Clearly, with a remaining carbon budget of 470–1,020 GtCO2eq from 2015 onwards for a 66% probability of stabilizing at concentration levels consistent with remaining below 2°C warming at the end of the 21st century and yearly emissions of about 40 GtCO2 per year, not much room is left for further postponing action. Many of the low stabilization pathways actually resort to the extraction of CO2 from the atmosphere (known as negative emissions or Carbon Dioxide Removal [CDR]), mostly by means of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS): if the biomass feedstock is produced sustainably, the emissions would be low or even carbon-neutral, as the additional planting of biomass would sequester about as much CO2 as is generated during energy generation. If additionally carbon capture and storage is applied, then the emissions balance would be negative. Large BECCS deployment thus facilitates reaching the 2°C target, also allowing for some flexibility in other sectors that are difficult to decarbonize rapidly, such as the agricultural sector. However, the large reliance on BECCS has raised uneasiness among policymakers, the public, and even scientists, with risks to sustainability being voiced as the prime concern. For example, the large-scale deployment of BECCS would require vast areas of land to be set aside for the cultivation of biomass, which is feared to conflict with conservation of ecosystem services and with ensuring food security in the face of a still growing population.While the progress that has been made in Paris leading to an agreement on stabilizing “well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels” and “pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C” was mainly motivated by the extent of the impacts, which are perceived to be unacceptably high for some regions already at lower temperature increases, it has to be taken with a grain of salt: moving to 1.5°C will further shrink the time frame to act and BECCS will play an even bigger role. In fact, aiming at 1.5°C will substantially reduce the remaining carbon budget previously indicated for reaching 2°C. Recent research on the biophysical limits to BECCS and also other negative emissions options such as Direct Air Capture indicates that they all run into their respective bottlenecks—BECCS with respect to land requirements, but on the upside producing bioenergy as a side product, while Direct Air Capture does not need much land, but is more energy-intensive. In order to provide for the negative emissions needed for achieving the 1.5°C target in a sustainable way, a portfolio of negative emissions options needs to minimize unwanted effects on non–climate policy goals.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!