Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage.

Journal articles on the topic 'Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 5 June 2025

Last updated: 16 July 2025

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Jephta Mensah Kwakye, Darlington Eze Ekechukwu, and Olorunshogo Benjamin Ogundipe. "Reviewing the role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) in climate mitigation." Engineering Science & Technology Journal 5, no. 7 (2024): 2323–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i7.1346.

Full text

Abstract:

Climate change poses an imminent threat, necessitating innovative and sustainable strategies for mitigation. This paper explores the potential of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) as a promising approach. The introductory section sets the stage by elucidating the urgency of climate action. The background section surveys existing climate mitigation strategies, introducing bioenergy and carbon capture technologies. The paper delves into the distinctive contributions of bioenergy to carbon emission reduction and assesses the viability of various bioenergy sources. Simultaneously, the discussion on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) provides insight into the technological aspects of carbon capture. An integral focus is the integration of bioenergy and carbon capture technologies in BECCS, exploring synergies that enhance their combined efficacy. Real-world examples and case studies illustrate successful BECCS projects. Environmental and social impacts are critically examined, considering sustainability and ethical dimensions. Challenges and criticisms associated with BECCS are discussed comprehensively, addressing concerns and proposing potential solutions. The paper concludes by outlining future prospects for BECCS, offering recommendations for policymakers and stakeholders. It also suggests avenues for further research and development in this evolving field. Keywords: Bioenergy, Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), Climate Mitigation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Gładysz, Paweł, Magdalena Strojny, Łukasz Bartela, Maciej Hacaga, and Thomas Froehlich. "Merging Climate Action with Energy Security through CCS—A Multi-Disciplinary Framework for Assessment." Energies 16, no. 1 (2022): 35. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en16010035.

Full text

Abstract:

Combining biomass-fired power generation with CO2 capture and storage leads to so-called negative CO2 emissions. Negative CO2 emissions can already be obtained when coal is co-fired with biomass in a power plant with CCS technology. The need for bioenergy with CO2 capture and storage has been identified as one of the key technologies to keep global warming below 2 °C, as this is one of the large-scale technologies that can remove CO2 from the atmosphere. According to the definition of bioenergy with CO2 capture and storage, capturing and storing the CO2 originating from biomass, along with the biomass binding with carbon from the atmosphere as it grows, will result in net removal of CO2 from the atmosphere. Another technology option for CO2 removal from the atmosphere is direct air capture. The idea of a net carbon balance for different systems (including bioenergy with CO2 capture and storage, and direct air capture) has been presented in the literature. This paper gives a background on carbon dioxide removal solutions—with a focus on ecology, economy, and policy-relevant distinctions in technology. As presented in this paper, the bioenergy with CO2 capture and storage is superior to direct air capture for countries like Poland in terms of ecological impact. This is mainly due to the electricity generation mix structure (highly dependent on fossil fuels), which shifts the CO2 emissions to upstream processes, and relatively the low environmental burden for biomass acquisition. Nevertheless, the depletion of non-renewable natural resources for newly built bioenergy power plant with CO2 capture and storage, and direct air capture with surplus wind energy, has a similar impact below 0.5 GJ3x/t of negative CO2 emissions. When the economic factors are a concern, the use of bioenergy with CO2 capture and storage provides an economic justification at current CO2 emission allowance prices of around 90 EUR/t CO2. Conversely, for direct air capture to be viable, the cost would need to be from 3 to 4.5 times higher.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Shcherbyna, Yevhen, Oleksandr Novoseltsev, and Tatiana Evtukhova. "Overview of carbon capture, utilisation and storage technologies to ensure low-carbon development of energy systems." System Research in Energy 2022, no. 2 (2022): 4–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/srenergy2022.02.004.

Full text

Abstract:

Carbon dioxide CO2 is a component of air that is responsible for the growing global warning and greenhouse gases emissions. The energy sector is one of the main sources of CO2 emissions in the world and especially in Ukraine. Carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) is a group of technologies that play a significant role along with renewable energy sources, bioenergy and hydrogen to reduce CO2 emissions and to achieve international climate goals. Nowadays there are thirty-five commercial CCUS facilities under operation around the world with a CO2 capture capacity up to 45 million tons annually. Tougher climate targets and increased investment provide new incentives for CCUS technologies to be applied more widely. CCUS are applications in which CO2 is captured from anthropogenic sources (power generation and industrial processes) and stored in deep geological formations without entering atmosphere or used in various products using technologies without chemical modification or with conversion. The article discusses the use of various technologies of CO2 capture (post-combustion capture, pre-combustion capture and oxy-combustion capture), CO2 separation methods and their application in the global energy transition to reduce the carbon capacity of energy systems. Technical and economic indicators of CO2 capture at different efficiencies for coal and gas power plants are given. Technologies of transportation and storage of captured carbon dioxide and their economic indicators are considered. The directions for the alternative uses of captured CO2, among which the main ones are the production of synthetic fuels, various chemicals and building materials, are also presented and described in the paper. The possibility of utilization captured СО2 in the production of synthetic fuel in combination with Power-to-Gas technologies was studied. Keywords: greenhouse gases emissions, fossil fuels, СО2 capture technologies, capture efficiency, synthetic fuel

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Hochman, Gal, and Vijay Appasamy. "The Case for Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies." Environments 11, no. 3 (2024): 52. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/environments11030052.

Full text

Abstract:

In this paper, we use the literature to help us better understand carbon capture costs and how these estimates fare against those of avoided costs, focusing on bioenergy carbon capture and storage (BECCS), carbon capture and storage (CCS), as well as direct air capture technologies. We approach these questions from a meta-analysis perspective. The analysis uses meta-analysis tools while applying them to numerical rather than statistical studies. Our analysis shows that avoided costs are, on average, 17.4% higher than capture costs and that the carbon intensity of the feedstock matters: the estimates for coal-based electricity generation capture costs are statistically smaller than those for natural gas or air. From a policy perspective, the literature suggests that the costs of CCS are like the 45Q subsidy of USD 50 per metric ton of carbon captured.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Sikarwar, Vineet Singh, Nageswara Rao Peela, Arun Krishna Vuppaladadiyam, et al. "Thermal plasma gasification of organic waste stream coupled with CO₂-sorption enhanced reforming employing different sorbents for enhanced hydrogen production." RSC Advances 12, no. 10 (2022): 6122–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra07719h.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Christianides, Diogenis, Dimitra Antonia Bagaki, Rudolphus Antonius Timmers, et al. "Biogenic CO2 Emissions in the EU Biofuel and Bioenergy Sector: Mapping Sources, Regional Trends, and Pathways for Capture and Utilisation." Energies 18, no. 6 (2025): 1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18061345.

Full text

Abstract:

The European biofuel and bioenergy industry faces increasing challenges in achieving sustainable energy production while meeting carbon neutrality targets. This study provides a detailed analysis of biogenic emissions from biofuel and bioenergy production, with a focus on key sectors such as biogas, biomethane, bioethanol, syngas, biomass combustion, and biomass pyrolysis. Over 18,000 facilities were examined, including their feedstocks, production processes, and associated greenhouse gas emissions. The results highlight forestry residues as the predominant feedstock and expose significant disparities in infrastructure and technology adoption across EU Member States. While countries like Sweden and Germany lead in emissions management and carbon capture through bioenergy production with carbon capture and storage systems (BECCS), other regions face deficiencies in bioenergy infrastructure. The findings underscore the potential of BECCS and similar carbon management technologies to achieve negative emissions and support the European Green Deal’s climate neutrality goals. This work serves as a resource for policymakers, industry leaders, and researchers, fostering informed strategies for the sustainable advancement of the biofuels sector.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Hu, Bin, Yilun Zhang, Yi Li, Yanguo Teng, and Weifeng Yue. "Can bioenergy carbon capture and storage aggravate global water crisis?" Science of The Total Environment 714 (April 2020): 136856. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136856.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Fridahl, Mathias. "Socio-political prioritization of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage." Energy Policy 104 (May 2017): 89–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.050.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Tanzer, Samantha Eleanor, Kornelis Blok, and Andrea Ramírez. "Can bioenergy with carbon capture and storage result in carbon negative steel?" International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 100 (September 2020): 103104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103104.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Full, Johannes, Steffen Merseburg, Robert Miehe, and Alexander Sauer. "A New Perspective for Climate Change Mitigation—Introducing Carbon-Negative Hydrogen Production from Biomass with Carbon Capture and Storage (HyBECCS)." Sustainability 13, no. 7 (2021): 4026. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13074026.

Full text

Abstract:

The greatest lever for advancing climate adaptation and mitigation is the defossilization of energy systems. A key opportunity to replace fossil fuels across sectors is the use of renewable hydrogen. In this context, the main political and social push is currently on climate neutral hydrogen (H2) production through electrolysis using renewable electricity. Another climate neutral possibility that has recently gained importance is biohydrogen production from biogenic residual and waste materials. This paper introduces for the first time a novel concept for the production of hydrogen with net negative emissions. The derived concept combines biohydrogen production using biotechnological or thermochemical processes with carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and storage. Various process combinations referred to this basic approach are defined as HyBECCS (Hydrogen Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage) and described in this paper. The technical principles and resulting advantages of the novel concept are systematically derived and compared with other Negative Emission Technologies (NET). These include the high concentration and purity of the CO2 to be captured compared to Direct Air Carbon Capture (DAC) and Post-combustion Carbon Capture (PCC) as well as the emission-free use of hydrogen resulting in a higher possible CO2 capture rate compared to hydrocarbon-based biofuels generated with Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) technologies. Further, the role of carbon-negative hydrogen in future energy systems is analyzed, taking into account key societal and technological drivers against the background of climate adaptation and mitigation. For this purpose, taking the example of the Federal Republic of Germany, the ecological impacts are estimated, and an economic assessment is made. For the production and use of carbon-negative hydrogen, a saving potential of 8.49–17.06 MtCO2,eq/a is estimated for the year 2030 in Germany. The production costs for carbon-negative hydrogen would have to be below 4.30 € per kg in a worst-case scenario and below 10.44 € in a best-case scenario in order to be competitive in Germany, taking into account hydrogen market forecasts.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Silveira, Brenda H. M., Hirdan K. M. Costa, and Edmilson M. Santos. "Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) in Brazil: A Review." Energies 16, no. 4 (2023): 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en16042021.

Full text

Abstract:

BECCS (bioenergy with carbon capture and storage) is an important technology to achieve international and Brazilian climatic goals, notably because it provides negative emissions. In addition, Brazil presents favorable conditions for the development of BECCS, given the country’s mature biofuel industry. Therefore, this research aims to provide a systematic literature review of the effective potential of and barriers to implementing bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in Brazil. The platforms chosen for this study are Science Direct and Integrated Search Portal, which is a search portal administered by the University of São Paulo. The search initially identified 667 articles, of which 24 were analyzed after selection and screening. The results show that technical factors are not a current barrier to the implementation of BECCS in Brazil, especially in ethanol production. However, the economic results vary among articles, but no BECCS plant has been shown to be economically feasible without enhanced oil recovery. In addition, the concentrations of most ethanol distilleries in the southeast region of Brazil point to them as long-hanging fruit for the country. Nevertheless, due to limitations in CO2 transportation, the costs of implementing BECCS increase significantly as CO2 capture is expanded away from the southeast region.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Mayer, B. "Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage: Existing and Emerging Legal Principles." Carbon & Climate Law Review 13, no. 2 (2019): 113–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2019/2/6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Muratori, Matteo, Nico Bauer, Steven K. Rose, et al. "EMF-33 insights on bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)." Climatic Change 163, no. 3 (2020): 1621–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02784-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Kato, Etsushi, Ryo Moriyama, and Atsushi Kurosawa. "A Sustainable Pathway of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage Deployment." Energy Procedia 114 (July 2017): 6115–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1748.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Beal, Colin M., Ian Archibald, Mark E. Huntley, Charles H. Greene, and Zackary I. Johnson. "Integrating Algae with Bioenergy Carbon Capture and Storage (ABECCS) Increases Sustainability." Earth's Future 6, no. 3 (2018): 524–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017ef000704.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Romanak, Katherine, Mathias Fridahl, and Tim Dixon. "Attitudes on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) as a Mitigation Technology within the UNFCCC." Energies 14, no. 3 (2021): 629. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en14030629.

Full text

Abstract:

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a technology for mitigating emissions from large point-source industries. In addition to the primary role of reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere, CCS forms the basis for two large-scale negative emissions technologies by coupling geologic CO2 storage with bioenergy (BECCS) and direct air carbon capture (DACCS). Despite its inclusion within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), CCS has been largely unsupported by UNFCCC delegates because of its association with fossil fuels. We evaluate data from surveys given since 2015 to UNFCCC delegates at the Conference of the Parties (COPs) to ascertain how attitudes about bioenergy, BECCS, and CCS may be changing within the UNFCCC. The results show a positive change in attitudes over time for both fossil CCS and BECCS. Using a unique data analysis method, we ascertain that, in some instances, popularity of BECCS increased due to an increased acceptance of CCS despite lower opinions of bioenergy. Business and research NGOs have the most positive views of CCS, and environmental NGOs the most negative views. Delegates that attend CCS side-events have more positive attitudes towards CCS than non-attendees. Developing countries have a larger need and a greater appetite for information on BECCS than developed countries, but a need for information exists in both.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Keerthi, Murugesan Mohana. "Innovative Approaches To Carbon Sequestration Emerging Technologies And Global Impacts On Climate Change Mitigation." Environmental Reports 6, no. 2 (2024): 15–18. https://doi.org/10.51470/er.2024.6.2.15.

Full text

Abstract:

Carbon sequestration is emerging as a crucial strategy to mitigate the effects of climate change by reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations. While natural processes such as forests and oceans contribute to carbon storage, engineered approaches have gained significant attention due to their potential to enhance sequestration on a global scale. This review explores innovative carbon sequestration technologies, including Direct Air Capture (DAC), Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), soil carbon sequestration, ocean fertilization, and carbon mineralization. Each of these technologies offers unique opportunities to capture and store CO2, with varying degrees of feasibility, cost, and environmental impact, their promise, challenges such as high costs, storage capacity concerns, and ecological risks remain. The review also discusses the global implications of these technologies on climate change mitigation, emphasizing the need for integrated policies, international cooperation, and ongoing research to maximize their potential. Ultimately, carbon sequestration, when coupled with emission reduction strategies, can play a pivotal role in achieving long-term climate goals.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Li, Guihe, and Jia Yao. "A Review of Algae-Based Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (Algae-Based CCUS)." Gases 4, no. 4 (2024): 468–503. https://doi.org/10.3390/gases4040024.

Full text

Abstract:

Excessive emissions of greenhouse gases, primarily carbon dioxide (CO2), have garnered worldwide attention due to their significant environmental impacts. Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) techniques have emerged as effective solutions to address CO2 emissions. Recently, direct air capture (DAC) and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) have been advanced within the CCUS framework as negative emission technologies. BECCS, which involves cultivating biomass for energy production, then capturing and storing the resultant CO2 emissions, offers cost advantages over DAC. Algae-based CCUS is integral to the BECCS framework, leveraging algae’s biological processes to capture and sequester CO2 while simultaneously contributing to energy production and potentially achieving net negative carbon emissions. Algae’s high photosynthetic efficiency, rapid growth rates, and ability to grow in non-arable environments provide significant advantages over other BECCS methods. This comprehensive review explores recent innovations in algae-based CCUS technologies, focusing on the mechanisms of carbon capture, utilization, and storage through algae. It highlights advancements in algae cultivation for efficient carbon capture, algae-based biofuel production, and algae-based dual carbon storage materials, as well as key challenges that need to be addressed for further optimization. This review provides valuable insights into the potential of algae-based CCUS as a key component of global carbon reduction strategies.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

SANDS, RONALD D. "U.S. CARBON TAX SCENARIOS AND BIOENERGY." Climate Change Economics 09, no. 01 (2018): 1840010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2010007818400109.

Full text

Abstract:

This paper documents application of the Future Agricultural Resources Model (FARM) to stylized carbon tax scenarios specified by the Stanford Energy Modeling Forum (EMF). Model results show that the method of tax revenue recycling makes a difference. Either labor-tax, or capital-tax, recycling can reduce the welfare cost of a carbon tax policy relative to lump sum recycling. Of the two tax recycling options, reducing capital taxes provides the greater reduction in welfare costs. However, carbon tax revenues decline with stringent carbon dioxide (CO2) emission targets and the availability of a negative-emissions technology such as bio-electricity with CO2 capture and storage (BECCS). As BECCS expands, net carbon tax revenues peak and decline due to an offsetting subsidy for carbon sequestration, limiting the potential for labor- or capital-tax recycling to reduce welfare costs of a climate policy.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Egerer, Sabine, Stefanie Falk, Dorothea Mayer, Tobias Nützel, Wolfgang A. Obermeier, and Julia Pongratz. "How to measure the efficiency of bioenergy crops compared to forestation." Biogeosciences 21, no. 22 (2024): 5005–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5005-2024.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract. The climate mitigation potential of terrestrial carbon dioxide removal (tCDR) methods depends critically on the timing and magnitude of their implementation. In our study, we introduce different measures of efficiency to evaluate the carbon removal potential of afforestation and reforestation (AR) and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) under the low-emission scenario SSP1-2.6 and in the same area. We define efficiency as the potential to sequester carbon in the biosphere in a specific area or store carbon in geological reservoirs or woody products within a certain time. In addition to carbon capture and storage (CCS), we consider the effects of fossil fuel substitution (FFS) through the usage of bioenergy for energy production, which increases the efficiency through avoided CO2 emissions. These efficiency measures reflect perspectives regarding climate mitigation, carbon sequestration, land availability, spatiotemporal dynamics, and the technological progress in FFS and CCS. We use the land component JSBACH3.2 of the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM) to calculate the carbon sequestration potential in the biosphere using an updated representation of second-generation bioenergy plants such as Miscanthus. Our spatially explicit modeling results reveal that, depending on FFS and CCS levels, BECCS sequesters 24–158 GtC by 2100, whereas AR methods sequester around 53 GtC on a global scale, with BECCS having an advantage in the long term. For our specific setup, BECCS has a higher potential in the South American grasslands and southeast Africa, whereas AR methods are more suitable in southeast China. Our results reveal that the efficiency of BECCS to sequester carbon compared to “nature-based solutions” like AR will depend critically on the upscaling of CCS facilities, replacing fossil fuels with bioenergy in the future, the time frame, and the location of tCDR deployment.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Haikola, Simon, Jonas Anshelm, and Anders Hansson. "Limits to climate action - Narratives of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage." Political Geography 88 (June 2021): 102416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102416.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Amos, R. "Bioenergy Carbon Capture and Storage in Global Climate Policy: Examining the Issues." Carbon & Climate Law Review 10, no. 4 (2017): 187–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2016/4/5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Muratori, Matteo, Katherine Calvin, Marshall Wise, Page Kyle, and Jae Edmonds. "Global economic consequences of deploying bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)." Environmental Research Letters 11, no. 9 (2016): 095004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Hanssen, S. V., V. Daioglou, Z. J. N. Steinmann, J. C. Doelman, D. P. Van Vuuren, and M. A. J. Huijbregts. "The climate change mitigation potential of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage." Nature Climate Change 10, no. 11 (2020): 1023–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0885-y.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Venton, Danielle. "Core Concept: Can bioenergy with carbon capture and storage make an impact?" Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, no. 47 (2016): 13260–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617583113.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Pour, Nasim, Paul A. Webley, and Peter J. Cook. "A Sustainability Framework for Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) Technologies." Energy Procedia 114 (July 2017): 6044–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1741.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Salas, D. A., A. J. Boero, and A. D. Ramirez. "Life cycle assessment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage: A review." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 199 (July 2024): 114458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114458.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Laude, Audrey. "Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage: are short-term issues set aside?" Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 25, no. 2 (2019): 185–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09856-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Sauhats, Antans, Diana Zalostiba, Andrejs Utans, and Roman Petrichenko. "Power Systems Transition Using Biofuels, Carbon Capture and Synthetic Methane Storage." E3S Web of Conferences 572 (2024): 02001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457202001.

Full text

Abstract:

Energy storage solutions are essential for enabling the deployment of large-scale renewable energy sources to achieve a low-emission and climate-neutral future. This paper evaluates the adequacy of energy systems by examining the utilization of carbon capture, hydrogen, and synthetic methane production and storage in existing or new power plants that use biofuels (incl. biomass). The selected approach holds particular promise in Latvia due to the presence of numerous bioenergy plants, a large underground gas storage facility, and the ongoing and planned rapid development of solar and wind power plants. We use a power systems simulation model that includes sub-models of various energy sources and interconnections with Sweden, Finland, and Poland, considering NORDPOOL electricity market rules. The methodology used incorporates investment volume, electricity price forecasting, and renewable energy potential planning. The preliminary results demonstrate that Latvia’s natural gas infrastructure makes carbon capture and synthetic methane storage technically and economically feasible, with a 17.8% return on assets. The economic feasibility of a hybrid power plant in the Baltic power system warrants further detailed investigation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Fajardy, Mathilde, and Niall Mac Dowell. "Can BECCS deliver sustainable and resource efficient negative emissions?" Energy & Environmental Science 10, no. 6 (2017): 1389–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7ee00465f.

Full text

Abstract:

Negative emissions technologies (NETs) in general and bioenergy with CO<sub>2</sub> capture and storage (BECCS) in particular are commonly regarded as vital yet controversial to meeting our climate goals. In this contribution we show how the sustainability and carbon efficiency, or otherwise, of BECCS depends entirely on the choices made throughout the BECCS supply chain.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Pavlova, P. L., K. A. Bashmur, P. M. Kondrashov, et al. "An overview of current trends in greenhouse gas reduction and possible strategies for their application in the oil and gas industry." SOCAR Proceedings, no. 2 (2023): 147–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.5510/ogp20230200857.

Full text

Abstract:

This article provides an overview of the flare gases composition and methods for quantifying its emissions, as well as current trends in reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the oil and gas industry which are associated with the combustion of associated gas at flare installations. For the oil and gas industry, synergy strategies have been proposed with bioenergy carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS) technologies. Modern technologies for the use of associated gas without combustion at flare installations are considered. Proposals to reduce flare gas emissions in the conditions of the Far North and the Arctic are presented to ensure sustainable development. Keywords: flare gas; greenhouse gases; associated gas; oil and gas industry; sustainable development.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Bennett, Jeffrey A., Mohammad Abotalib, Fu Zhao, and Andres F. Clarens. "Life cycle meta-analysis of carbon capture pathways in power plants: Implications for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage." International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 111 (October 2021): 103468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103468.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Azar, Christian, Daniel J. A. Johansson, and Niclas Mattsson. "Meeting global temperature targets—the role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage." Environmental Research Letters 8, no. 3 (2013): 034004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Halliday, Cameron, and T. Alan Hatton. "Net-Negative Emissions through Molten Sorbents and Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage." Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 59, no. 52 (2020): 22582–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c04512.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Buck, Holly Jean. "Challenges and Opportunities of Bioenergy With Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) for Communities." Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports 6, no. 4 (2019): 124–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40518-019-00139-y.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Hughes, Adam D., Kenny D. Black, Iona Campbell, Keith Davidson, Maeve S. Kelly, and Michael S. Stanley. "Does seaweed offer a solution for bioenergy with biological carbon capture and storage?" Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology 2, no. 6 (2012): 402–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1319.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Ganeshan, Prabakaran, Vigneswaran V S, Sarath C. Gowd, et al. "Bioenergy with carbon capture, storage and utilization: Potential technologies to mitigate climate change." Biomass and Bioenergy 177 (October 2023): 106941. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106941.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Poblete, Israel Bernardo S., Ofélia de Queiroz F. Araujo, and José Luiz de Medeiros. "Sewage-Water Treatment and Sewage-Sludge Management with Power Production as Bioenergy with Carbon Capture System: A Review." Processes 10, no. 4 (2022): 788. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pr10040788.

Full text

Abstract:

Sewage-water treatment comprehends primary, secondary, and tertiary steps to produce reusable water after removing sewage contaminants. However, a sewage-water treatment plant is typically a power and energy consumer and produces high volumes of sewage sludge mainly generated in the primary and secondary steps. The use of more efficient anaerobic digestion of sewage water with sewage sludge can produce reasonable flowrates of biogas, which is shown to be a consolidated strategy towards the energy self-sufficiency and economic feasibility of sewage-water treatment plants. Anaerobic digestion can also reduce the carbon footprint of energy sources since the biogas produced can replace fossil fuels for electricity generation. In summary, since the socio-economic importance of sewage treatment is high, this review examined works that contemplate: (i) improvements of sewage-water treatment plant bioenergy production and economic performances; (ii) the exploitation of technology alternatives for the energy self-sufficiency of sewage-water treatment plants; (iii) the implementation of new techniques for sewage-sludge management aiming at bioenergy production; and (iv) the implementation of sewage-water treatment with bioenergy production and carbon capture and storage.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Tangparitkul, Suparit, Thakheru Akamine, Romal Ramadhan, et al. "CO2 storage infrastructure and cost estimation for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in Northern Thailand." Carbon Capture Science & Technology 15 (June 2025): 100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2025.100425.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Lim, Theodore Chao, Amanda Cuellar, Kyle Langseth, and Jefferson L. Waldon. "Technoeconomic Analysis of Negative Emissions Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage through Pyrolysis and Bioenergy District Heating Infrastructure." Environmental Science & Technology 56, no. 3 (2022): 1875–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03478.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Freer, Muir, Clair Gough, Andrew Welfle, and Amanda Lea-Langton. "Carbon optimal bioenergy with carbon capture and storage supply chain modelling: How far is too far?" Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 47 (October 2021): 101406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101406.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Withey, Patrick, Craig Johnston, and Jinggang Guo. "Quantifying the global warming potential of carbon dioxide emissions from bioenergy with carbon capture and storage." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 115 (November 2019): 109408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109408.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Baik, Ejeong, Daniel L. Sanchez, Peter A. Turner, Katharine J. Mach, Christopher B. Field, and Sally M. Benson. "Geospatial analysis of near-term potential for carbon-negative bioenergy in the United States." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, no. 13 (2018): 3290–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720338115.

Full text

Abstract:

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is a negative-emissions technology that may play a crucial role in climate change mitigation. BECCS relies on the capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) following bioenergy production to remove and reliably sequester atmospheric CO2. Previous BECCS deployment assessments have largely overlooked the potential lack of spatial colocation of suitable storage basins and biomass availability, in the absence of long-distance biomass and CO2 transport. These conditions could constrain the near-term technical deployment potential of BECCS due to social and economic barriers that exist for biomass and CO2 transport. This study leverages biomass production data and site-specific injection and storage capacity estimates at high spatial resolution to assess the near-term deployment opportunities for BECCS in the United States. If the total biomass resource available in the United States was mobilized for BECCS, an estimated 370 Mt CO2⋅y−1 of negative emissions could be supplied in 2020. However, the absence of long-distance biomass and CO2 transport, as well as limitations imposed by unsuitable regional storage and injection capacities, collectively decrease the technical potential of negative emissions to 100 Mt CO2⋅y−1. Meeting this technical potential may require large-scale deployment of BECCS technology in more than 1,000 counties, as well as widespread deployment of dedicated energy crops. Specifically, the Illinois basin, Gulf region, and western North Dakota have the greatest potential for near-term BECCS deployment. High-resolution spatial assessment as conducted in this study can inform near-term opportunities that minimize social and economic barriers to BECCS deployment.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Brigagão, George Victor, Matheus de Andrade Cruz, Ofélia de Queiroz Fernandes Araújo, and José Luiz de Medeiros. "Enhancing Efficiency of Corncob-Fired Power Generation with Carbon Capture and Storage." E3S Web of Conferences 407 (2023): 03001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340703001.

Full text

Abstract:

Bioenergy from biomass wastes with carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an important way to compensate for hard-to-abate emissions and collaborate with decarbonizing the energy industry. This work evaluates a corncob-fired power generation with CCS regarding overall energy efficiency in two process alternatives: (a) post-combustion CO2 capture by an aqueous blend of methyl-diethanolamine and piperazine; and (b) oxy-combustion coupled to state-of-art air separation unit. The alternatives are simulated in Aspen HYSYS and compared with a conventional plant to evaluate the energy penalty of capturing CO2. The lean solvent composition is optimized for the lowest regeneration heat demand (2.92 GJ/tCO2). Post-combustion capture designed for 90% CO2 abatement presents an efficiency penalty of 7.96%LHV. In contrast, Oxy-combustion has zero CO2 emissions and outperforms Post-combustion with a lower penalty of 6.77%LHV, given a chance to have oxygen supplied at an energy cost of 139 kWh/tO2. To render Post-combustion the most efficient route, it would be necessary to have its reboiler heat ratio reduced to 2.30 GJ/tCO2.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Daioglou, Vassilis, Steven K. Rose, Nico Bauer, et al. "Bioenergy technologies in long-run climate change mitigation: results from the EMF-33 study." Climatic Change 163, no. 3 (2020): 1603–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02799-y.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractBioenergy is expected to play an important role in long-run climate change mitigation strategies as highlighted by many integrated assessment model (IAM) scenarios. These scenarios, however, also show a very wide range of results, with uncertainty about bioenergy conversion technology deployment and biomass feedstock supply. To date, the underlying differences in model assumptions and parameters for the range of results have not been conveyed. Here we explore the models and results of the 33rd study of the Stanford Energy Modeling Forum to elucidate and explore bioenergy technology specifications and constraints that underlie projected bioenergy outcomes. We first develop and report consistent bioenergy technology characterizations and modeling details. We evaluate the bioenergy technology specifications through a series of analyses—comparison with the literature, model intercomparison, and an assessment of bioenergy technology projected deployments. We find that bioenergy technology coverage and characterization varies substantially across models, spanning different conversion routes, carbon capture and storage opportunities, and technology deployment constraints. Still, the range of technology specification assumptions is largely in line with bottom-up engineering estimates. We then find that variation in bioenergy deployment across models cannot be understood from technology costs alone. Important additional determinants include biomass feedstock costs, the availability and costs of alternative mitigation options in and across end-uses, the availability of carbon dioxide removal possibilities, the speed with which large scale changes in the makeup of energy conversion facilities and integration can take place, and the relative demand for different energy services.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Regufe, Maria João, Ana Pereira, Alexandre F. P. Ferreira, Ana Mafalda Ribeiro, and Alírio E. Rodrigues. "Current Developments of Carbon Capture Storage and/or Utilization–Looking for Net-Zero Emissions Defined in the Paris Agreement." Energies 14, no. 9 (2021): 2406. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en14092406.

Full text

Abstract:

An essential line of worldwide research towards a sustainable energy future is the materials and processes for carbon dioxide capture and storage. Energy from fossil fuels combustion always generates carbon dioxide, leading to a considerable environmental concern with the values of CO2 produced in the world. The increase in emissions leads to a significant challenge in reducing the quantity of this gas in the atmosphere. Many research areas are involved solving this problem, such as process engineering, materials science, chemistry, waste management, and politics and public engagement. To decrease this problem, green and efficient solutions have been extensively studied, such as Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) processes. In 2015, the Paris Agreement was established, wherein the global temperature increase limit of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels was defined as maximum. To achieve this goal, a global balance between anthropogenic emissions and capture of greenhouse gases in the second half of the 21st century is imperative, i.e., net-zero emissions. Several projects and strategies have been implemented in the existing systems and facilities for greenhouse gas reduction, and new processes have been studied. This review starts with the current data of CO2 emissions to understand the need for drastic reduction. After that, the study reviews the recent progress of CCUS facilities and the implementation of climate-positive solutions, such as Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage and Direct Air Capture. Future changes in industrial processes are also discussed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Full, Johannes, Mathias Trauner, Robert Miehe, and Alexander Sauer. "Carbon-Negative Hydrogen Production (HyBECCS) from Organic Waste Materials in Germany: How to Estimate Bioenergy and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential." Energies 14, no. 22 (2021): 7741. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en14227741.

Full text

Abstract:

Hydrogen derived from biomass feedstock (biohydrogen) can play a significant role in Germany’s hydrogen economy. However, the bioenergy potential and environmental benefits of biohydrogen production are still largely unknown. Additionally, there are no uniform evaluation methods present for these emerging technologies. Therefore, this paper presents a methodological approach for the evaluation of bioenergy potentials and the attainable environmental impacts of these processes in terms of their carbon footprints. A procedure for determining bioenergy potentials is presented, which provides information on the amount of usable energy after conversion when applied. Therefore, it elaborates a four-step methodical conduct, dealing with available waste materials, uncertainties of early-stage processes, and calculation aspects. The bioenergy to be generated can result in carbon emission savings by substituting fossil energy carriers as well as in negative emissions by applying biohydrogen production with carbon capture and storage (HyBECCS). Hence, a procedure for determining the negative emissions potential is also presented. Moreover, the developed approach can also serve as a guideline for decision makers in research, industry, and politics and might also serve as a basis for further investigations such as implementation strategies or quantification of the benefits of biohydrogen production from organic waste material in Germany.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Full, Johannes, Silja Hohmann, Sonja Ziehn, et al. "Perspectives of Biogas Plants as BECCS Facilities: A Comparative Analysis of Biomethane vs. Biohydrogen Production with Carbon Capture and Storage or Use (CCS/CCU)." Energies 16, no. 13 (2023): 5066. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en16135066.

Full text

Abstract:

The transition to a carbon-neutral economy requires innovative solutions that reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and promote sustainable energy production. Additionally, carbon dioxide removal technologies are urgently needed. The production of biomethane or biohydrogen with carbon dioxide capture and storage are two promising BECCS approaches to achieve these goals. In this study, we compare the advantages and disadvantages of these two approaches regarding their technical, economic, and environmental performance. Our analysis shows that while both approaches have the potential to reduce GHG emissions and increase energy security, the hydrogen-production approach has several advantages, including up to five times higher carbon dioxide removal potential. However, the hydrogen bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (HyBECCS) approach also faces some challenges, such as higher capital costs, the need for additional infrastructure, and lower energy efficiency. Our results give valuable insights into the trade-offs between these two approaches. They can inform decision-makers regarding the most suitable method for reducing GHG emissions and provide renewable energy in different settings.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Even, Catherine, Dyna Hadroug, Youness Boumlaik, and Guillaume Simon. "Microalgae-based Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage quantified as a Negative Emissions Technology." Energy Nexus 7 (September 2022): 100117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100117.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Jones, Michael B., and Fabrizio Albanito. "Can biomass supply meet the demands of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)?" Global Change Biology 26, no. 10 (2020): 5358–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15296.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!