Academic literature on the topic 'Bioethanol Fermentation'

Doctor of Philosophy<br>Department of Biological & Agricultural Engineering<br>Donghai Wang<br>Grain sorghum is the second major starch-rich raw material (after corn) for bioethanol production in the United States. Most sorghum feedstock for bioethanol production is normal non-tannin sorghum. Waxy sorghum and tannin sorghum are rarely used due to lack of scientific information about waxy sorghum fermentation performance and the way to increase fermentation efficiency of tannin sorghum. The main objectives of this study were to investigate the fermentation performance of waxy sorghum and to improve fermentation efficiency of tannin sorghum using techniques such as germination and ozonation treatments. The ethanol fermentation performance on both waxy sorghum and tannin sorghum were evaluated using a dry grind ethanol fermentation procedure. Fermentation efficiencies of tested waxy sorghum varieties ranged from 86 to 93%, which was higher than normal (non-waxy) sorghum varieties. The advantages of using waxy sorghums for ethanol production include less energy consumption, higher starch and protein digestibility, shorter fermentation time, and less residual starch in distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS). Results from germination study showed germination significantly increased fermentation efficiency of tannin sorghum. The laboratory results were further confirmed by those from five field-sprouted grain sorghum samples. Significantly increased free amino nitrogen (FAN) contents in sprouted sorghum samples accelerated the ethanol fermentation process. Results from both laboratory-germinated and fieldsprouted samples demonstrated that germination not only increased fermentation efficiency (higher than 90%) but also reduced fermentation time by about 50%, which could result in energy saving and increased production capacity without additional investment. The excellent performance of sprouted sorghums may provide farmers a new market for field-sprouted sorghum (poor quality as food or feed) in a bad year. A previous study showed ozone had a strong connection to degradation of lignin macromolecules. The hypothesis was that ozone treatment may also reduce tannin activity and increase fermentation efficiency of tannin sorghum. Results showed that the ethanol production performance (ethanol yield, fermentation efficiency, and fermentation kinetics) of the ozone-treated, tannin sorghum flours was significantly improved compared with the untreated control. The other effects of ozonation on sorghum flour include pH value decrease, discoloration, and inactivation of tannin. In summary, these studies showed sorghum, no matter it was waxy, field-sprouted, or tannin sorghum, can be an excellent feedstock for ethanol production.

Doctor of Philosophy<br>Department of Biological & Agricultural Engineering<br>Donghai Wang<br>Among potential alternative liquid fuels, bioethanol is the widest utilized transportation fuels and mainly made from grains. Cellulosic biofuels provide environmental benefits not available from grain or sugar-based biofuels and are considered as a solid foundation to meet transportation fuels needs in a low-carbon economy, albeit with electrified vehicles and other technical advances. The objective of this research was to develop and optimize various bioprocessing units to boost cellulosic bioethanol titers and yields in order to accelerate the commercialization of cellulosic bioethanol production. The results showed high-solids biomass bioconversion (12%, w/v) was inefficient in the laboratory rotary shaker. However, a horizontal reactor with good mixing was effective for high solids loading (20%, w/v), yielding 75 g/L of glucose. To achieve the minimal economical ethanol distillation requirement of 40 g/L, integrated bioprocesses were conducted to boost ethanol titers and yields through co-fermentation of starchy grain and cellulosic biomass. The maximum ethanol concentration (68.7 g/L) was achieved at the corn flour and hydrothermal-treated corn stover ratio of 12:12 using raw starch granular enzyme with the ethanol yield of 86.0%. Co-fermentation of starchy substrate with hydrolysate liquor from saccharified biomass was able to significantly enhance ethanol concentration and reduce energy cost for distillation without sacrificing ethanol yields. These results indicated integration of first and second generation ethanol production could significantly accelerate the commercialization of cellulosic biofuel production. Novel technology, modified simultaneous saccharification and fermentation, was firstly established to enhance ethanol titers and yields, which achieved high ethanol titers of 72.3 g/L at high biomass loadings of 30% (w/v) with 70.0% ethanol yield.

Thesis (MScEng)--Stellenbosch University, 2013.<br>ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Whereas fuel used for transport and electricity production are mainly fossil–derived, there has recently been an increased focus on bio-fuels due to the impact of fossil derived fuel on the environment as well as the increased energy demand worldwide, concomitant with the depletion of fossil fuel reserves. Paper sludge produced by paper mills are high in lignocellulose and represents a largely untapped feedstock for bio-energy production. The aim of this study was to determine the composition, fermentability and optimum paper sludge loading and enzyme dosage for producing ethanol from paper sludge. This information was used to develop a model of the process in Aspen Plus®. The mass and energy balances obtained from the Aspen Plus® model were used to develop equipment specifications which were used to source equipment cost data. A techno-economic model was developed from the equipment cost data to assess the economic viability of the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) process utilising paper sludge as feedstock. Nine paper sludge samples obtained from Nampak Tissue (Pty) Ltd. were evaluated in terms of ethanol production and those samples yielding the highest and lowest ethanol titres were selected for optimisation. This allowed for the determination of a range of ethanol concentrations and yields, expressed as percentage of the theoretical maximum, which could be expected on an industrial scale. Response surface methodology was used to obtain quadratic mathematical models to determine the effects of solid loading and cellulase dosage on ethanol production and ethanol yield from paper sludge during anoxic fed-batch fermentations using Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain MH1000. This approach was augmented with a multi response optimisation approach incorporating a desirability function to determine the optimal solid loading and cellulase dosage in fed-batch SSF cultures. The multi response optimisation revealed that an optimum paper sludge loading of 21% (w/w) and a cellulase loading of 14.5 FPU g-1 be used regardless of the paper sludge sample. The fact that one optimal enzyme dosage and paper sludge loading is possible, regardless the paper sludge feed stock, is attractive since the SSF process can be controlled efficiently, while not requiring process alterations to optimize ethanol production when different batches of paper sludge are processed. At the optimum paper sludge loading and cellulase dosage a minimum ethanol concentration of 47.36 g l-1 (84.69% of theoretical maximum) can be expected regardless of the paper sludge used. An economic assessment was conducted to ascertain whether ethanol production from paper sludge using SSF is economically viable. Three scenarios were investigated. In the first scenario revenue was calculated from the ethanol sales linked to the basic fuel price, whereas in the second and third scenarios liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) consumption at the paper mill was replaced with anhydrous and 95% ethanol respectively. In all the cases, paper sludge feed rates of 15, 30 and 50 t d-1 were used. The production of ethanol from paper sludge for ethanol sales (scenario 1) resulted in higher IRR and NPV values, as well as shorter payback periods, compared to replacement of LPG at the paper mill (scenarios 2 and 3). At an assumed enzyme cost of $ 0.90 gal-1 (R 2.01 litre-1), IRR values of 11%, 22% and 30% were obtained at paper sludge feed rates of 15, 30 and 50 t d-1. A sensitivity analysis performed on the total capital investment and enzyme cost revealed that the SSF process is only economically viable at a paper sludge feed rate of 50 t d-1 irrespective of the variation in capital investment. For the SSF process to be economically viable the enzyme costs must be lower than $ 0.70 gal-1 (R 1.56 litre-1) and $ 1.20 gal-1 (R 2.68 litre-1) for paper sludge feed rates of 30 and 50 t d-1 respectively. The SSF process at a paper sludge feed rate of 15 t d-1 was not economically viable even assuming a zero enzyme cost. A Monte Carlo simulation revealed that the SSF process is economically viable at a paper sludge feed rate of 50 t d-1 as a mean IRR value of 32% were obtained with a probability of 26% to attain an IRR value lower than 25%. The SSF process at lower paper sludge loadings is not economically viable as probabilities of 70% and 95% were obtained to attain IRR values lower than 25% at paper sludge feed rates of 30 and 15 t d-1 respectively. From this study it can be concluded that paper sludge is an excellent feedstock for ethanol production for the sales of ethanol at a paper sludge feed rate in excess of 50 t d-1 with the added environmental benefit of reducing GHG emissions by 42.5%.<br>AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Aangesien dat brandstof vir vervoer en energie meestal vanaf fossiel afgeleide bronne kom, is daar onlangs ʼn groter fokus op bio-brandstowwe as gevolg van die impak van fossiel afgeleide brandstowwe op die omgewing en 'n verhoogde aanvraag na energie wêreldwyd, gepaardgaande met die uitputting van fossielbrandstof-reserwes. Papier slyk geproduseer deur papier meule is hoog in lignosellulose en verteenwoordig 'n grootliks onontginde grondstof vir etanol produksie. Die doel van die studie was om vas te stel wat die samestelling, fermenteerbaarheid, optimale papier slyk en ensiem ladings is vir die vervaardiging van etanol uit papier slyk. Die inligting was gebruik om 'n model van die proses in Aspen Plus® te ontwikkel. Die massa-en energiebalanse wat verkry is van die Aspen Plus® model was gebruik om toerusting spesifikasies te ontwikkel wat gebruik was om toerusting kostes te bereken. ‘n Tegno-ekonomiese model is ontwikkel om die ekonomiese lewensvatbaarheid van die gelyktydige versuikering en fermentasie proses “SSF” wat gebruik maak van papier slyk as grondstof te assesseer. Nege papier slyk monsters verkry vanaf Nampak Tissue (Pty) Ltd. is geëvalueer in terme van etanol produksie. Die monsters wat die hoogste en laagste etanol konsentrasies opgelewer het, is geselekteer vir optimalisering omdat dit toegelaat het vir die vasstelling van etanol konsentrasies en opbrengste, uitgedruk as persentasie van die teoretiese maksimum, wat verwag kan word in industrie. Reaksie oppervlak metodologie “RSM” is gebruik om wiskundige modelle te ontwikkel om die impak van papier slyk lading en sellulase dosis op etanol produksie en etanol opbrengs te assesseer. Die RSM is aangevul met 'n multi effek optimiserings benadering wat 'n wenslikheid funksie inkorporeer om die optimale papier slyk lading en sellulase dosis in gevoerde-enkellading SSF kulture te bepaal. Die multi effek optimalisering het getoon dat 'n optimale papier slyk lading van 21% (w/w) en 'n sellulase dosis van 14.5 FPU g-1 gebruik moet word, ongeag van die papier slyk monster. Die feit dat die optimale ensiem dosis en papier slyk lading dieselfde is ongeag die papier slyk monster, is aantreklik aangesien die SSF proses meer doeltreffend beheer kan word omdat proses veranderinge nie nodig is om die proses te optimaliseer nie. By die optimale papier slyk lading en sellulase dosis kan 'n minimum etanol konsentrasie van 47.36 g l-1 (84,69% van die teoretiese maksimum) verwag word ongeag van die papier slyk wat gebruik word. 'n Ekonomiese evaluasie is gedoen om vas te stel of etanol produksie vanaf papier slyk met behulp van SSF ekonomies lewensvatbaar is. Drie moontlikhede is ondersoek. In die eerste moontlikheid is die inkomste bereken vanaf etanol verkope gekoppel aan die basiese brandstofprys, terwyl in die tweede en derde moontlikhede, LPG by die papier meul vervang is met anhidriese en 95% etanol onderskeidelik. In al die gevalle was daar gebruik gemaak van papier slyk voer tempo’s van 15, 30 en 50 t d-1. Die produksie van etanol uit papier slyk vir verkope (moontlikheid 1) het gelei tot hoër IRR en die NPV waardes, sowel as korter terugverdien tydperke, in vergelyking met die vervanging van LPG by die papier meul (moontlikhede 2 en 3). Met ʼn ensiem koste van $ 0.90 gal-1 (R 2.01 litre-1) is IRR-waardes van 11%, 22% en 30% verkry teen papier slyk voer tempo’s van 15, 30 en 50 t d-1 onderskeidelik. 'n Sensitiwiteitsanalise uitgevoer op die totale kapitale belegging en ensiem koste het aan die lig gebring dat 'n SSF proses slegs ekonomies lewensvatbaar is op 'n papier slyk voer tempo van 50 t d-1 ongeag van die variasie in die kapitale belegging. Vir die SSF proses om ekonomies lewensvatbaar te wees, moet die ensiem kostes laer wees as $ 0.70 gal-1 (R 1.56 liter-1) en $ 1.20 gal-1 (R 2.68 liter-1) vir papier slyk voer tempo’s van onderskeidelik 30 en 50 t d-1. Die SSF proses was op 'n papier slyk voer tempo van 15 t d-1 nie ekonomies lewensvatbaar nie, selfs teen 'n ensiem koste van nul. 'n Monte Carlo-simulasie het getoon dat die SSF proses ekonomies lewensvatbaar is met 'n papier slyk voer tempo van 50 t d-1 omdat 'n gemiddelde IRR-waarde van 32% verkry is met 'n waarskynlikheid van 26% om 'n IRR-waarde laer as 25% te verkry. Die SSF proses teen papier slyk voer tempo’s van 30 en 15 t d-1 is nie ekonomies lewensvatbaar nie omdat waarskynlikhede van 70% en 95% onderskeidelik verkry is om IRR-waardes laer as 25% te kry. Daar kan van die studie afgelei word dat papier slyk 'n uitstekende grondstof is vir die produksie van etanol mits 'n papier slyk voer tempo van meer as 50 t d-1 bereik kan word. Die produksie van etanol vanaf papier slyk het die bykomende voordeel dat kweekhuis gasse (GHG) met 42.5% verminder word.

Due to the depletion of petroleum reserves and environmental concerns, bioethanol has been identified as an alternative fuel to petrol. Bioethanol is a fuel of bio-origin derived from renewable biomass. Starch and sugar containing materials are the primary sources of carbon for bioethanol production. Starch is firstly hydrolysed into simple sugars which are later fermented to bioethanol using Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae). The fermentation of sugars to bioethanol is however limited by inhibition of S. cerevisiae by the major product of the process, bioethanol. The challenge is thus in keeping the bioethanol concentration at levels which are not harmful to the fermenting organism. Keeping bioethanol concentration low in the broth will provide a suitable environment for yeast to grow and thus increase the overall production. Currently bioethanol producers use high water dilution rates to keep the bioethanol concentrations in the broth low enough so that yeast is not harmed. This excess water has to be removed in the downstream process, which is expensive. The use of excessive amounts of water in the fermentation can be avoided by continual removal of bioethanol from the broth. During this investigation the experimental conditions for the hydrolysis process were determined. A pH of 5.5 was determined as the best pH for Termamyl SC at 95°C with a pH of 5.0 for Spirizyme Fuel at 55°C during the liquefaction and the saccharification step, respectively. During the fermentation process the influence of yeast concentration on bioethanol production was investigated by varying the yeast concentration between 2 g.L-1 and 7 g.L-1. A yeast concentration of 5 g.L-1 produced the highest bioethanol yield of 0.48 g.g-1 after 48 hours of fermentation using S. cerevisiae. Later during the investigation a coupled fermentation/pervaporation system was employed in a batch system for continual removal of bioethanol in the fermentation broth in a process called simultaneous fermentation and separation (SFS). Through the continuous removal of bioethanol from the fermentation broth, the bioethanol concentration in the broth was kept low enough so that it was not harmful to the fermenting organism but the overall fermentation yield was not improved. Pervaporation is a membrane separation process used to separate azeotropic mixtures such as bioethanol and water. It is highly efficient, cost effective and uses less energy than distillation. During the SFS process a bioethanol yield of 0.22 g.g-1 was obtained. The SFS process yield for bioethanol was low compared to 0.45 g.g-1 of the traditional batch fermentation process. The lower overall bioethanol yield obtained in the SFS process could be attributed to only the supernatant being used in the SFS process and not the entire fermentation broth as in the traditional process. The results from this study proved that the SFS process was less efficient compared to the traditional batch fermentation process with respect to the bioethanol yield, but that the fermentation could be carried out without the necessity for additional process water.<br>Thesis (M.Sc. Engineering Sciences (Chemical and Minerals Engineering))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2010.

Bioethanol is an alternative fuel produced mainly by biochemical conversion of biomass. This can be carried out efficiently and economically by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of sugarcane, corn, wheat, cellulose, etc., a process which integrates the enzymatic saccharification of the complex, polymeric sugars to glucose with the fermentative synthesis of ethanol by yeasts (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). However, the SSF unit operation still contributes nearly 50% to the cost of ethanol production. In SSF it is essential that a high sugar yield is obtained in the saccharification of cellulose. This yield is affected by factors such as inhibition of enzyme action by heat and other degradation products, enzyme and substrate concentrations, speed of enzyme action, adsorption of cellulase to cellulose, and degree of agitation. SSF was investigated in an intensified form of plug flow reactor, called the Oscillatory Baffled Reactor (OBR). The effect of agitation on saccharification of microcrystalline cellulose was correlated with the mean strain rates in the reactors. After 168 h of saccharification at 200 Wm-3 (Watts per cubic meters), 91% conversion of the cellulose (~25 g L-1 glucose) was observed in the OBR, whereas in the STR 74% conversion (~21 g L-1 glucose) was observed. At 120 Wm-3, the conversion in the OBR was 69% (~19 g L-1 glucose) within the first 24 h of saccharification and 88% conversion (24 g L-1 glucose) after 168 h. At the same power density the conversions in the STR were 55% (15.3 g L-1 glucose) and 67% (~18.6 g L-1 glucose), differences of 14 and 21% respectively. At 200 Wm-3 the ethanol concentration in a Stirred Tank Reactor (STR) after 72 h was 10.9 g L-1 (80.3% of theoretical yield) equivalent to production yield Yp/s = 0.55 g.g-1 cellulose and a volumetric productivity Qp of 0.15 g L-1 h-1. In the OBR at 200 Wm-3 the final concentration of ethanol after 72 h SSF was 12.5 g L-1 (93.8% of theoretical yield) equivalent to production yield Yp/s = 0.63 g.g-1 cellulose and a volumetric productivity Qp of 0.2 g L-1 h-1. It is hypothesised that the reason for these differences is the differing extents of cellulase deactivation in the two reactors. The OBR has a more uniform shear field than the STR, so the enzyme and yeasts would be exposed to fewer pockets of high shear.

Bioethanol, produced from organic waste as a second-generation biofuel, is an important renewable energy source. Here, recalcitrant carbohydrate sources, such as municipal and agricultural waste, and plants grown on land not suitable for food crops, are exploited. The thermophilic, Gram-positive bacterium Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius is naturally very flexible in its growth substrates and produces a variety of fermentation products, including lactate, formate, acetate and ethanol. TMO Renewables Ltd. used metabolic engineering to enhance ethanol production, creating the production strain TM242 (NCIMB 11955 ∆ldh, ∆pfl, pdhup). Ethanol yield has been increased to 82% of the theoretical maximum on glucose and up to 92% of the theoretical maximum on cellobiose. However, this strain still produces acetate, presumably derived from the overproduction of acetyl-CoA through the upregulated pdh gene encoding the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. An alternative to the mixed fermentation pathway found in G. thermoglucosidasius is to introduce a homoethanologenic pathway. Yeast and a very limited range of mesophilic bacteria use the homoethanol fermentation pathway, which employs pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC) in conjunction with alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), to convert pyruvate to ethanol. Despite extensive screening, no PDC has yet been identified in a thermophilic organism. Using the thermophile G. thermoglucosidasius as a host platform, we endeavoured to develop a thermophilic version of the homoethanol pathway for use in Geobacillus spp. This Thesis reports the in vitro characterization and crystal structure of one of the most thermostable bacterial PDCs from the mesophile Zymobacter palmae (ZpPDC) and describes strategies to improve expression of active PDC at high growth temperatures. This includes codon harmonization and the successful development of a PET (producer of ethanol) operon. Furthermore, ancestral sequence reconstruction was explored as an alternative engineering approach, but did not yield a PDC more thermostable than ZpPDC. In vitro ZpPDC is most active at 65°C with a denaturation temperature of 70°C, when sourced from a recombinant mesophilic host. Codon harmonization improved detectable PDC activity in G. thermoglucosidasius cultures grown up to 65°C by up to 42%. Pairing this PDC with G. thermoglucosidasius ADH6 produced a PET functional up to 65°C with ethanol yields of 87% of the theoretical maximum on glucose. This increase in yield at temperatures of up to 15°C higher than previously reported for any PDC expressed.

Thesis (MBA (Business Management))--University of Stellenbosch, 2007.<br>ENGLISH SUMMARY: Fossil fuel has been the preferred source for the production of transportation fuel for many years. However, this is not a renewable resource. Many conflicting reports have been published as to how long this resource will last. One thing is certain: eventually the supply of cheap crude oil will run out. It is therefore crucial to start the search for renewable alternatives now. There are a number of possible candidates vying for replacing fossil fuel as primary transportation fuel. Hydrogen, methanol, biodiesel and bioethanol all have the characteristics required of a good transportation fuel. It is unlikely that only one of these will replace oil. A more likely scenario would be that they all play a role in transportation in the future. Apart from being renewable, these alternatives have the further advantage of being less damaging to the environment, something that will become essential in future. Among the renewable alternatives, bioethanol has the second highest energy density. Currently, ethanol production worldwide almost exclusively uses sugarcane and maize as raw material. However, both these are food crops and using them for ethanol could lead to an increase in food prices. Furthermore, there is not enough agricultural land available to produce sufficient quantities of sugarcane and maize for ethanol to replace fossil fuel. Producing ethanol from plant material has the potential to meet the capacity requirements without impacting directly on food production. Approximately 180 million tons of agricultural biomass are produced in the United States each year, sufficient to produce 75 to 110 billion litres of ethanol. Despite its abundance, the technical challenges in converting cellulose to ethanol are significant. One major obstacle to the production of ethanol out of plant material is that most of the sugar in plant material is unavailable for fermentation by micro-organisms. In order to render the sugars in the cellulose fraction accessible to conversion, it is necessary to treat the plant fibres with a combination of chemical and enzymatic processes. Only when a complex mixture of enzymes is used, does it become possible to break down cellulose to glucose for subsequent fermentation to ethanol. Biomass processing by means of enzymes currently involves four separate biological steps: (i) production of enzymes (cellullases and hemicellulases), (ii) hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicellulose to sugars, (iii) fermentation of hexose sugars and (iv) fermentation of pentose sugars. Consolidated BioProcessing (CBP) will combine all these steps into one. However, CBP is not yet possible and the magnitude of research and developmental advancement required to realize this goal is significant. Both sugar and starch ethanol technologies are well established and major process advances are therefore unlikely. Currently there are no commercial-sized plants for the production of ethanol from lignocellulosics, however this is likely to change in the near future considering the progress made in this field during recent years. This study will focus on the current status of the bioethanol industry, as well as on the potential for future development.<br>AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Fossielbrandstof was vir baie jare die hoofbron vir die produksie van brandstof vir die vervoerbedryf. Fossielbrandstof is nie ’n hernubare energiebron nie en daar is al baie gespekuleer oor presies hoe lank daar nog goedkoop olie beskikbaar sal wees. Baie min van die gepubliseerde bronne stem ooreen, maar almal is dit eens dat olie op een of ander stadium sal opraak. Om hierdie rede is dit noodsaaklik om nou reeds te soek na alternatiewe. Daar is ’n hele aantal hernubare alternatiewe wat gebruik kan word in die plek van olie. Waterstof, metanol, biodiesel en bioetanol beskik almal oor die nodige eienskappe om ’n effektiewe vervoerbrandstof te wees. Die hoofvoordeel van hierdie brandstowwe is dat hulle minder skadelik is vir die omgewing as olie, ’n eienskap wat baie belangrik sal wees in die toekoms. Die kans is eger skraal dat een van bogenoemde bronne die mark totaal sal oorheers soos wat olie tot op hede oorheers het. ’n Meer waarskynlik uitkoms sou wees dat al hierdie bronne op een of ander manier ’n rol gaan speel in die vervoerbedryf in die toekoms. Etanol het die tweede hoogste energie digtheid van die vier genoemde hernubare brandstowwe. Etanol word tans uitsluitlik van suikerriet en mielies geproduseer. Beide suikerriet en mielies is voedselgewasse en die gebruik daarvan vir brandstof kan lei tot ’n toename in voedselpryse. Daar is ook nie genoeg landbougrond beskikbaar vir die verbouing van suikerriet en mieles sodat genoeg etanol geproduseer kan word om fosielbranstof te vergang nie. Die vervaardiging van etanol vanaf lignosellulose het die potensiaal om etanolkapasiteitprobleme te oorkom sonder om direk met voedselproduksie te kompeteer. Ongeveer 180 miljoen ton landbouafval word jaarliks in die Verenigde State geproduseer, genoeg vir die vervaardiging van tussen 75 en 110 biljoen liter etanol. Die tegniese kompleksiteit gekoppel aan die omskakeling van sellulose na etanol is beduidend. Die belangrikste hindernis vir die produksie van etanol vanaf plantmateriaal is die feit dat die meeste van die suiker nie beskibaar is vir fermentasie deur mikroörganismes nie. Plantvesels moet daarom met ’n kombinasie van chemikalieë en ensieme behandel word om sodoende die suiker beskikbaar te maak vir omskakeling. Sellulose kan slegs met ’n komplekse mengsel van ensieme afgebreek word tot glukose wat dan daarna gefermenteer kan word tot etanol. Die verwerking van biomassa met behulp van ensieme behels tans vier afsonderlike biologiese stappe: (i) ensiemproduksie (sellulases en hemisellulases), (ii) hidrolise van sellulose en hemisellulose tot fermenteerbare suikers, (iii) fermentasie van heksose suikers en (iv) fermentasie van pentose suikers. Consolidate BioProcessing (CBP) poog om al vier hierdie stappe te kombineer. Ongelukkig is die CBP proses nog nie moontlik nie en daar moet nog baie navorsing en ontwikkeling gedoen word om dit ’n realiteit te maak. Beide die metodes vir suiker- en styseletanolproduksie is goed gevestig, dus is die kans vir beduidende verbeteringe klein. Daar is tans geen aanlegte van kommersiële grootte vir die produksie van etanol vanaf lignocellulose nie, maar dit gaan waarskynlik binnekort verander as ’n mens die vordering in ag neem wat daar onlangs gemaak is in hierdie veld. Hierdie studie fokus op die huidige stand van sake in die etanolbedryf en die ontwikkelingsmoontlikhede vir die toekoms.