Academic literature on the topic 'Bloom, Harold – Criticism and interpretation'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Bloom, Harold – Criticism and interpretation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Bloom, Harold – Criticism and interpretation"
Jiménez Heffernan, Julián. "Autoridad, poesistocracia y arbitraje: Harold Bloom, lector del "Quijote"." Tropelías: Revista de Teoría de la Literatura y Literatura Comparada, no. 19 (May 23, 2013): 296. http://dx.doi.org/10.26754/ojs_tropelias/tropelias.201319643.
Full textAparecido Silva, Heraldo. "Filosofia Literária: Uma Encruzilhada Entre os Caminhos de Harold Bloom e Richard Rorty." Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 26, no. 51 (2018): 55–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philosophica201826515.
Full textCorder, Jim W. "Learning the Text: Little Notes about Interpretation, Harold Bloom, the Topoi, and the Oratio." College English 48, no. 3 (March 1986): 243. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/376631.
Full textSelby, Martha Ann. "Desire for Meaning: Providing Contexts for Prākrit Gāthās." Journal of Asian Studies 55, no. 1 (February 1996): 81–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2943637.
Full textWicher, Andrzej. "The Inverted Initiation Rituals in Shakespeare with a Special Emphasis on Hamlet." Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance 23, no. 38 (June 30, 2021): 159–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/2083-8530.23.10.
Full textWapińska, Malwina. "Bruno Schulz – mistrz, inspirator czy literacki ojciec Jerzego Ficowskiego." Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis | Studia Historicolitteraria 16 (December 11, 2017): 134–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.24917/20811853.16.10.
Full textChandra Julianto. "PERKEMBANGAN PENAFSIRAN KONFESI-KONFESI YEREMIA." Jurnal Amanat Agung 15, no. 1 (June 1, 2019): 1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.47754/jaa.v15i1.340.
Full textHauge, Hans. "Alt-i-alt: Et gensyn med Poul Borums syn på Digteren Grundtvig." Grundtvig-Studier 60, no. 1 (January 1, 2009): 188–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/grs.v60i1.16545.
Full textHodder, Alan D. "“After a High Negative Way”: Emerson's “Self-Reliance” and the Rhetoric of Conversion." Harvard Theological Review 84, no. 4 (October 1991): 423–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0017816000017946.
Full textSlinn, Warwick. "Criticism in Society: Interviews with Jacques Derrida, Northrop Frye, Harold Bloom, Geoffrey Hartman, Frank Kermode, Edward Said, Barbara Johnson, Frank Lentricchia, and J. Hillis Miller (review)." Philosophy and Literature 14, no. 1 (1990): 184–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/phl.1990.0058.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Bloom, Harold – Criticism and interpretation"
Cashion, Tim. "Rorty, Freud, and Bloom : the limits of communication." Thesis, McGill University, 1991. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=60611.
Full textLima, Luiz Fernando Martins de [UNESP]. "A recepção crítica de Harold Bloom no meio acadêmico brasileiro." Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/94043.
Full textCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Harold Bloom (1930) é, para muitos, o crítico norte-americano de maior destaque nos estudos literários da atualidade. Sua teoria da influência, além de possuir sua própria retórica, resgatou à literatura seus aspectos mais subjetivos. O presente trabalho tem por objetivo empreender uma leitura de dissertações e teses acadêmicas brasileiras que tenham lançado mão da teoria da angústia da influência e seu mapa de desleitura, ou que discutam temas como o cânone literário, tão usualmente associado à figura do professor de Yale, enfático debatedor desse assunto. Para esse propósito foi feito o levantamento do corpus por meio de uma pesquisa nos principais sites e bancos de dados científicos brasileiros, como a Plataforma Lattes e o Banco de Tese da CAPES, e estabelecido os critérios de análise com base nas teses e dissertações que compõem esse corpus. A leitura desses trabalhos acadêmicos buscou identificar em que medida o crítico norte-americano está sendo lido no meio acadêmico brasileiro e compreender qual a amplitude dessas leituras. Por conseguinte, esta dissertação tem o intuito de entender qual a relevância das idéias de Bloom para o intelectual brasileiro da área de Letras.
Nowadays, Harold Bloom (1930) is, to many, the North-american critic of major projection in literary studies. His theory of influence, besides to have its own rhethorics, brought back to literature its more subjective aspects. The present work has as its objectives to engage in a reading of Brazilian academic dissertations and thesis which have made usage of the theory of anxiety of influence and his map of misreading, or which discuss themes as the literary canon, so usually associated to the professor of Yale´s figure, an emphatic debater of this subject. With this purpose in mind it was made the survey of the corpus through a research in the main Brazilian scientific websites and databases, like Plataforma Lattes and CAPES thesis database, and it was established the criteria of analysis based upon the thesis and dissertations which compound this corpus. The reading of these academic works sought to identify in what extent the North-American critic is been read in Brazilian academic environment and comprehend how wide have been these readings. Therefore, this dissertation has as its aim to understand how relevant to the Brazilian scholar of Language and Literature the ideas of Bloom area.
Lima, Luiz Fernando Martins de. "A recepção crítica de Harold Bloom no meio acadêmico brasileiro /." Assis : [s.n.], 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/94043.
Full textBanca: Sílvia Maria Azevedo
Banca: Alice Áurea Penteado Martha
Resumo: Harold Bloom (1930) é, para muitos, o crítico norte-americano de maior destaque nos estudos literários da atualidade. Sua teoria da influência, além de possuir sua própria retórica, resgatou à literatura seus aspectos mais subjetivos. O presente trabalho tem por objetivo empreender uma leitura de dissertações e teses acadêmicas brasileiras que tenham lançado mão da teoria da angústia da influência e seu mapa de desleitura, ou que discutam temas como o cânone literário, tão usualmente associado à figura do professor de Yale, enfático debatedor desse assunto. Para esse propósito foi feito o levantamento do corpus por meio de uma pesquisa nos principais sites e bancos de dados científicos brasileiros, como a Plataforma Lattes e o Banco de Tese da CAPES, e estabelecido os critérios de análise com base nas teses e dissertações que compõem esse corpus. A leitura desses trabalhos acadêmicos buscou identificar em que medida o crítico norte-americano está sendo lido no meio acadêmico brasileiro e compreender qual a amplitude dessas leituras. Por conseguinte, esta dissertação tem o intuito de entender qual a relevância das idéias de Bloom para o intelectual brasileiro da área de Letras.
Abstract: Nowadays, Harold Bloom (1930) is, to many, the North-american critic of major projection in literary studies. His theory of influence, besides to have its own rhethorics, brought back to literature its more subjective aspects. The present work has as its objectives to engage in a reading of Brazilian academic dissertations and thesis which have made usage of the theory of anxiety of influence and his map of misreading, or which discuss themes as the literary canon, so usually associated to the professor of Yale's figure, an emphatic debater of this subject. With this purpose in mind it was made the survey of the corpus through a research in the main Brazilian scientific websites and databases, like Plataforma Lattes and CAPES thesis database, and it was established the criteria of analysis based upon the thesis and dissertations which compound this corpus. The reading of these academic works sought to identify in what extent the North-American critic is been read in Brazilian academic environment and comprehend how wide have been these readings. Therefore, this dissertation has as its aim to understand how relevant to the Brazilian scholar of Language and Literature the ideas of Bloom area.
Mestre
Villa, Silvia Maria Teresa. "Concept of canon in literary studies : critical debates 1970-2000." Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/7853.
Full textCohen, Hella Bloom. "Private Affections: Miscegenation and the Literary Imagination in Israel-Palestine." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2014. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc500171/.
Full textMarie, Annika. "The most radical act: Harold Rosenberg, Barnett Newman and Ad Reinhardt." Thesis, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/2152/3456.
Full textHeistein, Sue. "Texts, strategies, rules." Master's thesis, 1991. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/139472.
Full textNel, Johannes Erasmus. "Harold Pinter : breading strategies with reference to The Birthday party, The Homecoming and One for the road." Thesis, 1989. http://hdl.handle.net/10386/2131.
Full textKrüger, Johanna Alida. "The Actual versus the Fictional in Betrayal, The Real Thing and Closer." Thesis, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/18570.
Full textAlthough initially dismissed as superficial, Harold Pinter’s Betrayal, Tom Stoppard’s The Real Thing, and Patrick Marber’s Closer use the theme of marital betrayal as a trope to investigate metatheatrical and epistemological issues. This study aims to demonstrate how these three plays define and explore the concept of authenticity within the fictional as well as the actual world; how arbitrary the construction and mediation of the characters’ identities are, not only from their own perspective, but also from the audience’s; the significance of the audience’s role in these plays and how issues of authenticity, fictionality and dishonesty impact on a genre that depends on illusion. This study intends to provide a new interpretation of these three texts through an analysis drawn from postmodern and poststructuralist theories, concerning the concept of authenticity within art and language. This study finds that the fictional worlds in these plays are created through mediation, which includes everyday language as well as complex works of art. Authenticity is shown to be an elusive concept. Language is either unsuccessfully used to force authentic responses from characters, or as a shield. In Betrayal, language functions as a protective barrier, preventing the characters from knowing one another. The Real Thing suggests that although inauthenticity may be established, the inverse is not necessarily true. In Closer, the characters try in vain to access authenticity through different registers of language. Furthermore, neither the body nor the mind is shown to be the locus of authenticity in Closer. Within the postmodern context where originality is impossible, mimicry is not seen as something external and inauthentic, but as inextricably part of human existence. The audience is drawn into the fictional world of these plays as its members are able to identify with the disillusionment of the characters and their inability to form a definitive view of each other. Simultaneously, the audience is ousted from the fictional world by being reminded of the author’s presence through metatheatrical devices. These plays take advantage of the fictional status of theatre to explore issues of authenticity, positioning them in direct opposition to postdramatic and verbatim plays.
Afrikaans & Theory of Literature
D. Litt. et Phil. (Theory of Literature)
Kruger, Johanna Alida. "The Actual versus the Fictional in Betrayal, The Real Thing and Closer." Thesis, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/18570.
Full textAlthough initially dismissed as superficial, Harold Pinter’s Betrayal, Tom Stoppard’s The Real Thing, and Patrick Marber’s Closer use the theme of marital betrayal as a trope to investigate metatheatrical and epistemological issues. This study aims to demonstrate how these three plays define and explore the concept of authenticity within the fictional as well as the actual world; how arbitrary the construction and mediation of the characters’ identities are, not only from their own perspective, but also from the audience’s; the significance of the audience’s role in these plays and how issues of authenticity, fictionality and dishonesty impact on a genre that depends on illusion. This study intends to provide a new interpretation of these three texts through an analysis drawn from postmodern and poststructuralist theories, concerning the concept of authenticity within art and language. This study finds that the fictional worlds in these plays are created through mediation, which includes everyday language as well as complex works of art. Authenticity is shown to be an elusive concept. Language is either unsuccessfully used to force authentic responses from characters, or as a shield. In Betrayal, language functions as a protective barrier, preventing the characters from knowing one another. The Real Thing suggests that although inauthenticity may be established, the inverse is not necessarily true. In Closer, the characters try in vain to access authenticity through different registers of language. Furthermore, neither the body nor the mind is shown to be the locus of authenticity in Closer. Within the postmodern context where originality is impossible, mimicry is not seen as something external and inauthentic, but as inextricably part of human existence. The audience is drawn into the fictional world of these plays as its members are able to identify with the disillusionment of the characters and their inability to form a definitive view of each other. Simultaneously, the audience is ousted from the fictional world by being reminded of the author’s presence through metatheatrical devices. These plays take advantage of the fictional status of theatre to explore issues of authenticity, positioning them in direct opposition to postdramatic and verbatim plays.
Afrikaans and Theory of Literature
D. Litt. et Phil. (Theory of Literature)
Books on the topic "Bloom, Harold – Criticism and interpretation"
Autonomie und Tradition: Innovativer Konservatismus bei Rudolf Borchardt, Harold Bloom und Botho Strauss. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2009.
Find full textSchirrmacher, Frank. Schrift als Tradition: Die Dekonstruktion des literarischen Kanons bei Kafka und Harald Bloom. Frankfurt am Main: [s.n., 1987.
Find full textBolla, Peter De. Harold Bloom: Towards historical rhetorics. London: Routledge, 1988.
Find full textBolla, Peter De. Harold Bloom: Towards historical rhetorics. London: Routledge, 1988.
Find full textGraham, Allen. Harold Bloom: Poetics of conflict. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994.
Find full textHarold Bloom: The rhetoric of Romantic vision. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1985.
Find full textThe saving lie: Harold Bloom and deconstruction. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press, 2011.
Find full textBielik-Robson, Agata. The saving lie: Harold Bloom and deconstruction. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press, 2011.
Find full textReading, writing and the influence of Harold Bloom. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Bloom, Harold – Criticism and interpretation"
Sawyer, Robert. "Looking for Mr. Goodbard: Swinburne, Resentment Criticism, and the Invention of Harold Bloom." In Harold Bloom’s Shakespeare, 167–80. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-03641-4_13.
Full text"Harold Bloom." In Criticism & Society, 57–86. Routledge, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315016009-9.
Full text"Harold Bloom: Critics, Bards, and Prophets." In Volume 12, Tome IV: Kierkegaard's Influence on Literature, Criticism and Art, 67–96. Routledge, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315234816-11.
Full textGraef, Ortwin de. "7. The Yale Critics? J. Hillis Miller, Geoffrey Hartman, Harold Bloom, Paul de Man." In Modern North American Criticism and Theory, 40–49. Edinburgh University Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9780748626786-008.
Full textStavans, Ilan. "8. The critic’s “I”." In Jewish Literature: A Very Short Introduction, 81–92. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190076979.003.0009.
Full text"realities they name. Though corrupt, they remain dictions, fissures, discord, repressions, aporias, etc. divinely given and the poet’s burden is to purify the Inasmuch as their response is a product of their language of his own tribe. Words have been ‘wrested time, so is mine for I remain caught up in a vision of from their true calling’, and the poet attempts to the poem I had during my graduate years at the wrest them back in order to recreate that natural lan-University of Cambridge when I began seriously to guage in which the word and its reality again merge. read it. What I had anticipated to be an obscure alleg-Like Adam, he gives names to his creatures which ory that could be understood only by an extended express their natures. His word-play is a sustained study of its background became more clear the more and serious effort to plant true words as seeds in the I read it until I had the sense of standing at the reader’s imagination. In Jonson’s phrase, he ‘makes centre of a whirling universe of words each in its pro-their minds like the thing he writes’ (1925– per order and related to all the others, its meanings 52:8.588). He shares Bacon’s faith that the true end constantly unfolding from within until the poem is of knowledge is ‘a restitution and reinvesting (in seen to contain all literature, and all knowledge great part) of man to the sovereignty and power (for needed to guide one’s personal and social life. In the whensoever he shall be able to call the creatures by intervening years, especially as a result of increasing their true names he shall again command them) awareness of Spenser’s and his poem’s involvement which he had in his first state of creation’ (Valerius in Ireland, as indicated by the bibliographies com-Terminus). Although his poem remains largely piled by Maley in 1991 and 1996a, and such later unfinished, he has restored at least those words that studies as McLeod 1999:32–62, but best shown in are capable of fashioning his reader in virtuous and Hadfield 1997, I have come to realize also the pro-gentle discipline. What is chiefly needed to under-found truth of Walter Benjamin’s observation that stand the allegory of The Faerie Queene fully is to ‘there is no document of civilization that is not at the understand all the words. That hypothesis is the basis same time a document of barbarism’. The greatness of my annotation. of The Faerie Queene consists in being both: while it My larger goal is to help readers understand ostensibly focuses on Elizabeth’s court, it is impos-why Spenser was honoured in his day as ‘England’s sible even to imagine it being written there, or at any Arch-Poët’, why he became Milton’s ‘Original’ and place other than Ireland, being indeed ‘wilde fruit, the ‘poet’s poet’ for the Romantics (see ‘poet’s poet’ which saluage soyl hath bred’ (DS 7.2). in the SEnc), and why today Harold Bloom 1986: If Spenser is to continue as a classic, criticism must 2 may claim that he ‘possessed [mythopoeic power] continue to recreate the poem by holding it up as a . . . in greater measure than any poet in English mirror that first of all reflects our own anxieties and except for Blake’, and why Greenblatt 1990b:229 concerns. It may not be possible, or even desirable, may judge him to be ‘among the most exuberant, to seek a perspective on the poem ‘uncontaminated generous, and creative literary imaginations in our by late twentieth century interests and beliefs’, as language’. Stewart 1997:87 urges, and I would only ask with As I write in a year that marks a half century of my him that we need to be aware of ‘historical voices engagement with the poem, I have come to realize other than our own, including Spenser’s’. As far as the profound truth of Wallace Stevens’s claim that possible criticism should serve also as a transparent ‘Anyone who has read a long poem day after day glass through which to see what Spenser intended as, for example, The Faerie Queene, knows how the and what he accomplished in ‘Fashioning XII Morall poem comes to possess the reader and how it nat-vertues’. Of course, we cannot assume that under-uralizes him in its own imagination and liberates standing his intention as it is fulfilled in the poem him there’ (1951:50). It has been so for me though, necessarily provides a sufficient reading, but it may I also recognize, not for many critics today whose provide a focus for understanding it. Contemporary engagement with the poem I respect. With Mon-psychological interpretation of the poem’s characters trose 1996:121–22, I am aware that ‘the cultural reads the poem out of focus, and the commendable politics that are currently ascendant within the aca-effort to see the poem embedded in its immediate demic discipline of literary studies call forth condem-sociopolitical context, chiefly Spenser’s relation to nations of Spenser for his racist / misogynist / elitist the Queen, fails to allow that he wrote it ‘to liue with." In Spenser: The Faerie Queene, 40. Routledge, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315834696-38.
Full text