Contents
Academic literature on the topic 'Book-to-market ratio effect'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Book-to-market ratio effect.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Book-to-market ratio effect"
Justina, Dormauli. "Pengaruh Firm Size dan Market to Book Ratio terhadap Return Portofolio." JURNAL MANAJEMEN DAN BISNIS SRIWIJAYA 15, no. 2 (June 8, 2018): 138–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.29259/jmbs.v15i2.5701.
Full textWaegenaere, Anja De, Richard C. Sansing, and Jacco L. Wielhouwer. "Valuation of a Firm with a Tax Loss Carryover." Journal of the American Taxation Association 25, s-1 (January 1, 2003): 65–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/jata.2003.25.s-1.65.
Full textAnugrahani, Acchedya, and Rahmat Setiawan. "Analisis Equity Market Timing dan Struktur Modal." SKETSA BISNIS 7, no. 1 (August 29, 2020): 45–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.35891/jsb.v7i1.2204.
Full textB, Yuliarto Nugroho. "The Effect of Book to Market Ratio, Profitability, and Investment on Stock Return." International Journal of Economics and Management Studies 7, no. 6 (June 25, 2020): 102–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.14445/23939125/ijems-v7i6p114.
Full textJaunanda, Meliana, and Baby Amelia Fransesca. "Analisis Pengaruh Rasio Likuiditas, Rasio Profitabilitas, Rasio Solvabilitas Dan Rasio Pasar Terhadap Return Saham." Jurnal ULTIMA Accounting 7, no. 1 (June 1, 2015): 54–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.31937/akuntansi.v7i1.82.
Full textUsman, Sitty Shandragies, Idham Masri Ishak, and Selvi Selvi. "Do profitability ratio and market ratio contribute to explain the movement of stock prices of transport companies?" Jambura Science of Management 2, no. 2 (July 2, 2020): 46–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.37479/jsm.v2i2.4574.
Full textYunita, Irni, Rina Indiastuti, Ria Ratna Ariawati, and Erie Febrian. "Moderating Impact of Ownership Structure on Relationship of Equity Market Timing with Capital Structure on Companies Listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange." International Journal of Family Business Practices 1, no. 2 (December 31, 2018): 125. http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/ijfbp.v1i2.641.
Full textSinggih, Marmono, Veryantika Putri Pricilia, and Eka Lavista. "MARKET TO BOOK VALUE, FIRM SIZE, AND THE UNDERPRICING OF INDONESIAN INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS." Review of Management and Entrepreneurship 2, no. 2 (September 25, 2019): 75–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.37715/rme.v2i2.964.
Full textRahman, Syed Md Khaled. "Effect of Financial Leverage on Firm's Market Value Creation in Bangladesh." International Journal of Corporate Finance and Accounting 4, no. 2 (July 2017): 41–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijcfa.2017070103.
Full textYu, Jing Long, Tse Mao Lin, and Xin Hui Wu. "Does Brexit Have a Bullish or Bearish Effect on the Taiwan Stock Market?" International Journal of Economics and Financial Research, no. 73 (July 11, 2021): 90–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.32861/ijefr.73.90.101.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Book-to-market ratio effect"
Vieira, Pedro Nuno Rino Carreira. "Efeitos dimensão e book to market ratio revisitados : o caso inglês." Master's thesis, Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/601.
Full textUma das correntes teóricas centrais do universo da investigação em finanças assenta na Efficient Markets Hipothesys, segundo a qual os mercados são eficientes e os investidores racionais, na lógica do pensamento de Markowitz e do modelo CAPM. No entanto, têm vindo a ser identificadas na literatura diversas anomalias, nomeadamente overeraction, underreaction, efeito earnings value, efeito dimensão e efeito book to market, entre outros. O estudo destas anomalias tem vindo a ser levado a cabo sobretudo no contexto do paradigma Behavioural Finance. Fama e French (1992) identificam o efeito dimensão e o efeito book to market como os mais relevantes para a explicação da evolução dos preços dos activos financeiros, desenvolvendo com base neles um modelo multi-factor para a explicação das respectivas rendibilidades. Para o efeito, assumem os respectivos indicadores como proxies de factores de risco (Fama e French, 1993). Por contraposição, Daniel e Titman (1997) apresentam evidência de que a dimensão e o book to market explicam a rendibilidade dos títulos por serem características relevantes da empresa e não por constituírem proxies de factores de risco. Resultados que Davis, Fama e French (2000) rebateram com um conjunto de dados diferente e com uma nova metodologia de tratamento. Quem terá razão? Eis a nossa dúvida inicial. No entanto, a nossa surpreendente e inesperada evidência para o mercado inglês começa por contrariar o modelo proposto por Fama e French (1993) e mostra grandes contradições na relação entre os efeitos dimensão e book to market, por um lado, e rendibilidade e volatilidade na Inglaterra e nos EUA. Surgiram aparentes irracionalidades, de tal forma que as bases de suporte da nossa questão deixaram de fazer sentido. Uma coisa parece certa: os resultados confirmam, no mínimo, a má-especificação do CAPM e, no máximo, sugerem que os mercados financeiros não são de todo eficientes.
The Efficient Markets Hypothesis is one of the mainstream theories in the financial world. Financial markets are supposed to be efficient and its players rational as defined by Markowitz (1959) and assumed by the CAPM. However, several anomalies, such as overreaction, underreaction, earnings value, size effect or book to market effect, have been reported during the last 25 years, especially in the 80's. Many of the academic working in this subfield regards their results as strong evidence against the Efficient Markets Hypothesis. This approach is usually known in the financial markets academic community as the Behavioural Finance paradigm. In work published in 1992, Fama and French have studied all these anomalies concluding that size effect and the book to market effects are the most relevant ones. With these two variables and a market factor P they have proposed a multifactor model to explain the stock return. They assume that all market value and Book to Market Ratio are proxies to some distress factor. However, Daniel and Titman (1997) show that these factors can not be understood as distress factor proxies, but as relevant characteristics that can actually explain the cross section variation in stock returns. On their work Davis, Fama and French (2000) refuse these results using a different set of data and another methodology. The question is Who's right? This was our initial focus. However, we have found surprising and unexpected evidence against the Fama-French Model in the United Kingdom market and challenging about the size and market to book effects in both UK and USA. Some irrationality has come up making our initial question irrelevant under the Daniel and Titman (1997) and Davis, Fama and French (2000) methodologies. One issue remain certain: our results, at least, support a bad CAPM specification and, at most, suggest that financial markets are not efficient, at all.
Martin, Kris Rowland. "The Effect of Accounting Method Choice on Earnings Quality: A Study of Analysts' Forecasts of Earnings and Book Value." Diss., Virginia Tech, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/29240.
Full textPh. D.
Celiker, Umut. "Cross Sectional Determinants Of Turkish Stock Market Returns." Thesis, METU, 2004. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12605243/index.pdf.
Full textLundgren, Anton, and Sara Ahlgren. "P/B i kombination med marknadsvärde : En studie på Stockholmsbörsen 2006 - 2016." Thesis, Linköpings universitet, Företagsekonomi, 2017. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-138819.
Full textBackground: This study is a test of an investment strategy based on relative valuation of multiples. The multiple to be studied is Price-to-Book (P/B). P/B is chosen because although previously researched, the implications of book values paired with market values are still not well understood. Aim: The aim of this study is to examine and analyze the multiple P/B as an investment strategy for stocks. Moreover, this study intends to examine stocks with low and high P/B: s from the Small, Mid and Large Cap on the Stockholm Stock Exchange. Completion: Six portfolios are created based on low and high P/B: s respectively from the market value-based stock exchange lists Small, Mid and Large Cap on the Stockholm Stock Exchange. The portfolios are rebalanced annually and are followed between 2006 and 2016. Results: Four out of six portfolios exhibit higher levels of cumulative returns than the chosen stock index before and after adjusting for risk. However, weak statistical evidence prevent conclusive showings of excess returns over time. Similarly, we find weak support for differences in returns between low and high P/B: s. Neither does there seem to exist significant differences in return and risk between the Small, Mid and Large Cap.
Bargman, Daniil, and Lisa Hansmann. "IFRS Implementation in Germany and the UK : And its Effects on the Quality of Accounting Information from an Investor Perspective." Thesis, Internationella Handelshögskolan, Högskolan i Jönköping, IHH, Företagsekonomi, 2011. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-15534.
Full textGuo, Ferng-Chuen, and 郭逢春. "Book to Market Ratio Effect under Different Investment Horizon ─ Taiwan Stock Market." Thesis, 1993. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/48283636566386114408.
Full text