Academic literature on the topic 'BRICS'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'BRICS.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "BRICS"
K Jha, Sanjay. "Have the Bricks of BRICS Started Decaying?" International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) 12, no. 5 (May 5, 2023): 822–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.21275/sr23510195907.
Full textShah Zainal Abidin, Irwan, Muhammad Haseeb, Lee Wen Chiat, and Md Rabiul Islam. "Determinants of Malaysia – BRICS trade linkages: gravity model approach." Investment Management and Financial Innovations 13, no. 2 (July 14, 2016): 389–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.13(2-2).2016.14.
Full textDavis, Karen. "BRICS." Counterfutures 1 (March 1, 2016): 189. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/cf.v1i0.6451.
Full textSarkar, Urvashi. "BRICS." South Asian Survey 21, no. 1-2 (March 2014): 127–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0971523115592495.
Full textCarvalho, Evandro Menezes de. "A segunda década do BRICS." Idéias 9, no. 2 (December 14, 2018): 265–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.20396/ideias.v9i2.8655191.
Full textAndal, Aireen Grace T., and Ksenia G. Muratshina. "Adjunct rather than alternative in global governance: An examination of BRICS as an international bloc through the perception of its members." Social Science Information 61, no. 1 (January 27, 2022): 77–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/05390184211068012.
Full textLissovolik, Y. "BRICS Plus following the 2023 “expansion summit”." Pathways to Peace and Security, no. 2 (2023): 42–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/2307-1494-2023-2-42-52.
Full textMiranda, Luiz Ricardo de, and Olavo De Oliveira Bittencourt Neto. "BRICS e o Meio Ambiente | BRICS and the Environment." Revista Justiça do Direito 32, no. 1 (May 15, 2018): 188–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.5335/rjd.v32i1.7044.
Full textKarn, Arodh Lal, and Rakshha Kumari Karn. "BRICS Dream: BRICS in International Stabilization and Reconstruction Efforts." OALib 03, no. 06 (2016): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102696.
Full textBacik, Gokhan. "Turkey and the BRICS: Can Turkey Join the BRICS?" Turkish Studies 14, no. 4 (December 2013): 758–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2013.861109.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "BRICS"
Yilmaz, Emre, and Shakir Husain. "Hitting a BRIC Wall : MIST countries becoming the new BRICs?" Thesis, Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-18374.
Full textKotze, Klaus. "BRICS: strategies of persuasion." Doctoral thesis, Faculty of Law, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30014.
Full textWilson, Peter Antony. "'BRICS' and international tax law." Thesis, Queen Mary, University of London, 2017. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/24872.
Full textFarias, Carlos Eduardo dos Santos. "BRICS : emergência dos arranjos informais." Universidade Católica de Santos, 2015. http://biblioteca.unisantos.br:8181/handle/tede/2422.
Full textMade available in DSpace on 2016-05-18T19:01:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Carlos Eduardo dos Santos Farias.pdf: 763061 bytes, checksum: 4523c6ecf29b1ccf0faeb9b1d0bf2705 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-10-28
This research paper proposes an analysis of the emergence of informal arrangements as a new form of multilateralism, pointing out the historical evolution of international organizations as institutions representing multilateralism in practice. The crisis in classical multilateralism is unequivocal, for the world has been conferring a new shape to international relationships among its actors: less bureaucratic, less institutionalized, more efficient and effective. Informal arrangements bring in themselves cooperation as element of order, leaving the idea of ¿power for power¿ behind, in which the rich exploited the poor in compliance with military forces. BRICS is an example of a successful informal arrangement, that puts together such different countries with an only purpose in mind: development of participants based on the idea of cooperation. Times have changed, and international relationships must now adapt to this new world order.
O presente trabalho propõe a análise do surgimento dos arranjos informais como uma nova forma de multilateralismo, destacando a evolução histórica das organizações internacionais, como instituições que representam o multilateralismo na prática. A crise do multilateralismo clássico é evidente, pois o mundo está formatando uma nova roupagem para as relações internacionais de seus atores, menos burocrática, menos institucionalizada, mais eficiente e eficaz. Os arranjos informais trazem consigo a cooperação como elemento de ordem, deixando para traz a ideia do poder pelo poder, onde os ricos exploravam os pobres, através da imposição da força militar. O BRICS é o exemplo de arranjo informal que vem dando certo, e que fez juntar países tão diferentes, em prol de um único propósito, o desenvolvimento de seus integrantes, baseado na ideia de cooperação. Os tempos mudaram e as relações internacionais estão sendo obrigadas a se moldarem a esta nova ordem mundial.
Kurucová, Ivana. "Juhoafrická republika medzi krajinami BRICS." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2011. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-201634.
Full textSantos, Renato Xavier [UNESP]. "BRICS e as contingências do discurso." Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/150620.
Full textApproved for entry into archive by Luiz Galeffi (luizgaleffi@gmail.com) on 2017-05-12T13:28:48Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 santos_rx_me_mar.pdf: 1120526 bytes, checksum: aa04b315db7a84825603b0fdbfbd2574 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2017-05-12T13:28:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 santos_rx_me_mar.pdf: 1120526 bytes, checksum: aa04b315db7a84825603b0fdbfbd2574 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-04-30
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
O objetivo do trabalho é analisar o papel do discurso na formação do BRICS. A hipótese é que os discursos possibilitaram a aproximação entre os cinco países e forjaram uma identidade contingencial entre Brasil, Rússia, Índia, China e, posteriormente, África do Sul. Para testar a hipótese, será utilizado o referencial teórico pós-estruturalista de Laclau e Mouffe (1985), bem como o dos teóricos das Relações Internacionais que trabalham com identidade e discurso nos estudos de política externa. Como metodologia, foram eleitos 22 discursos proferidos pelos líderes dos países BRICS no âmbito da Assembleia Geral das Nações Unidas, com um recorte temporal de 2002 a 2009. Além disso, será analisado o documento resultante da I Reunião de Cúpula do BRIC, em 2009. Com isso, pretende-se testar alguns elementos discursivos presentes no BRICS para demonstrar a formação do arranjo a partir de uma identidade contingencial. Os elementos discursivos a serem investigados são os seguintes: (1) contingência do discurso; (2) identidade relacional; (3) pratica articulatória; (4) discurso hegemônico. O discurso é um complexo de elementos dados a partir de um conjunto de relações. No âmbito das relações internacionais, as interações acontecem em diversos campos da política. Particularmente, a Organização das Nações Unidas é uma importante arena de embate político, mas também de cooperação entre as nações. Por aglutinar diversas demandas específicas, a Organização das Nações Unidas é um dos principais espaços de interação social, no qual os Estados e outros agentes sociais procuram representar, significar e ressignificar as relações sociais. As relações diplomáticas também são capazes de criar novas percepções sobre o mundo. Dessas interações, novas identidades são construídas ou reconstruídas e interpretadas à luz da linguagem discursiva.
The objective of this work is to analyze the role of discourse in the formation of BRICS. The hypothesis is that the discourses made possible the approximation between the five countries and forged a contingent identity between Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. To test the hypothesis, we will use the post-structuralist theoretical framework of Laclau and Mouffe (1985), as well as that of International Relations theorists who work with identity and discourse in foreign policy studies. In terms of methodology, it will be analyzed 22 speeches delivered by the leaders of BRICS countries at General Assembly of the United Nations from 2002 to 2009. In addition, the document resulting from the I BRIC Summit, in 2009, will be studied. Therefore, we intend to test some discursive elements present in the BRICS to demonstrate the formation of the arrangement from a contingencial identity. The discursive elements to be investigated are the following: (1) contingency of discourse; 2) relational identity; (3) articulatory practice; (4) hegemonic discourse. Discourse is a complex of elements given from a set of relations. In the context of international relations, interactions take place in various fields of politics. In particular, the United Nations is an important arena of political struggle, but also of cooperation among nations. Because it brings together several specific demands, the United Nations is one of the main spaces of social interaction, in which States and other social agents seek to represent, signify and re-signify social relations. Diplomatic relations are also capable of creating new insights about the world. From these interactions, new identities are constructed or reconstructed and interpreted in the light of discursive language.
Santos, Renato Xavier. "BRICS e as contingências do discurso /." Marília, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/150620.
Full textCo-orientador: Carlos Eduardo Ferreira de Carvalho
Banca: Marco Aurélio Nogueira
Banca: Ramon Garcia Fernandez
O Programa de Pós-Graduação em Relações Internacionais é instituído em parceria com a Unesp/Unicamp/PUC-SP, em projeto subsidiado pela CAPES, intitulado "Programa San Tiago Dantas"
Resumo: O objetivo do trabalho é analisar o papel do discurso na formação do BRICS. A hipótese é que os discursos possibilitaram a aproximação entre os cinco países e forjaram uma identidade contingencial entre Brasil, Rússia, Índia, China e, posteriormente, África do Sul. Para testar a hipótese, será utilizado o referencial teórico pós-estruturalista de Laclau e Mouffe (1985), bem como o dos teóricos das Relações Internacionais que trabalham com identidade e discurso nos estudos de política externa. Como metodologia, foram eleitos 22 discursos proferidos pelos líderes dos países BRICS no âmbito da Assembleia Geral das Nações Unidas, com um recorte temporal de 2002 a 2009. Além disso, será analisado o documento resultante da I Reunião de Cúpula do BRIC, em 2009. Com isso, pretende-se testar alguns elementos discursivos presentes no BRICS para demonstrar a formação do arranjo a partir de uma identidade contingencial. Os elementos discursivos a serem investigados são os seguintes: (1) contingência do discurso; (2) identidade relacional; (3) pratica articulatória; (4) discurso hegemônico. O discurso é um complexo de elementos dados a partir de um conjunto de relações. No âmbito das relações internacionais, as interações acontecem em diversos campos da política. Particularmente, a Organização das Nações Unidas é uma importante arena de embate político, mas também de cooperação entre as nações. Por aglutinar diversas demandas específicas, a Organização das Nações Unidas é um dos principai... (Resumo completo, clicar acesso eletrônico abaixo)
Abstract: The objective of this work is to analyze the role of discourse in the formation of BRICS. The hypothesis is that the discourses made possible the approximation between the five countries and forged a contingent identity between Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. To test the hypothesis, we will use the post-structuralist theoretical framework of Laclau and Mouffe (1985), as well as that of International Relations theorists who work with identity and discourse in foreign policy studies. In terms of methodology, it will be analyzed 22 speeches delivered by the leaders of BRICS countries at General Assembly of the United Nations from 2002 to 2009. In addition, the document resulting from the I BRIC Summit, in 2009, will be studied. Therefore, we intend to test some discursive elements present in the BRICS to demonstrate the formation of the arrangement from a contingencial identity. The discursive elements to be investigated are the following: (1) contingency of discourse; 2) relational identity; (3) articulatory practice; (4) hegemonic discourse. Discourse is a complex of elements given from a set of relations. In the context of international relations, interactions take place in various fields of politics. In particular, the United Nations is an important arena of political struggle, but also of cooperation among nations. Because it brings together several specific demands, the United Nations is one of the main spaces of social interaction, in which States and other... (Complete abstract click electronic access below)
Mestre
Abbas, Haitham, and Edon Saliju. "FDI Determinants : The case of BRICS." Thesis, Internationella Handelshögskolan, Jönköping University, IHH, Nationalekonomi, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-50430.
Full textKaucká, Kristýna. "Česká ekonomická diplomacie v zemích BRICS." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2012. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-142086.
Full textMišendová, Zuzana. "The economic position of China within the group "BRICS"." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2011. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-165373.
Full textBooks on the topic "BRICS"
Thussu, Daya Kishan, and Kaarle Nordenstreng, eds. BRICS Media. New York: Routledge, 2020. | Series: Internationalizing media studies: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429468759.
Full textMarino, Rich. The Future BRICS. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137396440.
Full textJones, Stephanie, ed. BRICS and Beyond. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119208181.
Full textLèbre La Rovere, Renata, Luiz de Magalhães Ozório, and Leonardo de Jesus Melo, eds. Entrepreneurship in BRICS. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11412-5.
Full textMonyae, David, and Bhaso Ndzendze, eds. The BRICS Order. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62765-2.
Full textJosé Vicente de Sá Pimentel. Debatendo o BRICS. Brasília: Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão, 2013.
Find full textPashkov, M. M. Russia in BRICS: Parlamentary dimension = Rossiia v BRIKS : parlamentskoe izmerenie. Moskva: Izdanie Gosudarstvennoi Dumy, 2015.
Find full textDeĭch, T. L. BRIKS--Afrika: Partnerstvo i vzaimodeĭstvie = BRICS--Africa : partnership and interaction. Moskva: IAfr, 2013.
Find full textBeausang, Francesca. Globalization and the BRICs. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137271600.
Full textSmirnov, Sergey, Ataman Ozyildirim, and Paulo Picchetti, eds. Business Cycles in BRICS. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90017-9.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "BRICS"
Sadler, Thomas R. "BRICS." In Absolute Essentials of International Economics, 113–24. London: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003434900-13.
Full textPandey, Aparaajita, and Huma Siddiqui. "BRICS." In Locating BRICS in the Global Order, 302–10. London: Routledge India, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003148074-21.
Full textBurke, John J. A. "BRICS." In Financial Services in the Twenty-First Century, 175–88. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63967-9_13.
Full textEngel, Ulf. "The BRICS." In The Routledge Handbook of Transregional Studies, 643–50. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2019. | Series: The Routledge history handbooks: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429438233-80.
Full textThussu, Daya Kishan, and Kaarle Nordenstreng. "Introduction." In BRICS Media, 1–19. New York: Routledge, 2020. | Series: Internationalizing media studies: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429468759-1.
Full textHu, Zhengrong, Deqiang Ji, Peixi Xu, and Kriti Bhuju. "Beyond convergence." In BRICS Media, 124–37. New York: Routledge, 2020. | Series: Internationalizing media studies: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429468759-10.
Full textmilton, viola candice, and Winston Mano. "South Africa." In BRICS Media, 138–56. New York: Routledge, 2020. | Series: Internationalizing media studies: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429468759-11.
Full textStraubhaar, Joseph. "Brazil and corporatist soft power." In BRICS Media, 159–76. New York: Routledge, 2020. | Series: Internationalizing media studies: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429468759-13.
Full textGavra, Dmitry, and Elena Bykova. "Russian soft power from USSR to Putin’s Russia." In BRICS Media, 177–92. New York: Routledge, 2020. | Series: Internationalizing media studies: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429468759-14.
Full textThussu, Daya Kishan. "India." In BRICS Media, 193–208. New York: Routledge, 2020. | Series: Internationalizing media studies: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429468759-15.
Full textConference papers on the topic "BRICS"
Zharikov, M. V. "BRICS Currencies' Internationalization." In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference "Far East Con" (ISCFEC 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/iscfec-18.2019.120.
Full textMedvedev, Yury, Sergei Barov, Igor Stroganov, and Alexey Grishin. "BRICS UNIVERSITY NETWORK." In 11th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. IATED, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2018.0577.
Full textRevinova, Svetlana. "BRICS: STRATEGIC ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP." In 5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES and ARTS SGEM2018. STEF92 Technology, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2018/1.3/s04.064.
Full textBruyninckx, Herman, Markus Klotzbücher, Nico Hochgeschwender, Gerhard Kraetzschmar, Luca Gherardi, and Davide Brugali. "The BRICS component model." In the 28th Annual ACM Symposium. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2480362.2480693.
Full textStepenkova, Zoya Evgenyevna, and Irina Anatolievna Kashuro. "BRICS, ENERGY AND INVESTMENT." In Collection of articles 7th International Scientific Conference. ISOASPSH of N.D. Kondratieff, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.46865/978-5-901640-36-4-2021-472-478.
Full textLazanyuk, Inna. "INDIA AND BRICS: COOPERATION STRATEGY." In 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM2017. Stef92 Technology, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2017/hb11/s12.116.
Full textGusarova, Svetlana A., Igor V. Gusarov, and Margarita S. Smeretchinskii. "E-commerce in BRICS Countries." In Sustainable and Innovative Development in the Global Digital Age. Dela Press Publishing House, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.56199/dpcsebm.xlji8995.
Full text"Title Page iii." In 2013 BRICS Congress on Computational Intelligence & 11th Brazilian Congress on Computational Intelligence (BRICS-CCI & CBIC). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/brics-cci-cbic.2013.3.
Full text"Table of contents." In 2013 BRICS Congress on Computational Intelligence & 11th Brazilian Congress on Computational Intelligence (BRICS-CCI & CBIC). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/brics-cci-cbic.2013.5.
Full text"Message from the General Program Chair." In 2013 BRICS Congress on Computational Intelligence & 11th Brazilian Congress on Computational Intelligence (BRICS-CCI & CBIC). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/brics-cci-cbic.2013.7.
Full textReports on the topic "BRICS"
Moudatsou-Hellenic, Argiro. BRICS in Africa: Economic ties and impacts. E-papers Servicos Editoriais Ltda, September 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.48207/23577681/bpcp0701.
Full textCutrera, Fillipo. Do the BRICS care about International Security? E-papers Servicos Editoriais Ltda, January 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.48207/23181818/pb0902.
Full textRueland, Juergen. Why Indonesia chose autonomy over BRICS membership. East Asia Forum, October 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.59425/eabc.1698274120.
Full textGarcia-Herrero, Alicia. China continues to dominate an expanded BRICS. East Asia Forum, April 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.59425/eabc.1712959200.
Full textEsteves, Paulo, Geovana Zoccal, and Gabriel Torres. Os BRICS e o Novo Banco de Desenvolvimento. E-papers Servicos Editoriais Ltda, September 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.48207/23181818/pb0603.
Full textVeloso, Sérgio, ed. BRICS Monitor – Desigualdades e políticas públicas nas sociedades. E-papers Servicos Editoriais Ltda, July 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.48207/23181818/bm0905.
Full textAmorim, Alice, Beatriz Mattos, Maureen Santos, and Paula Morales. The BRICS on the road to COP 21. E-papers Servicos Editoriais Ltda, October 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.48207/23181818/pb0511.
Full textBouchard, Joseph. Laying the BRICS for a reshaped global order. East Asia Forum, October 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.59425/eabc.1696716055.
Full textDuque, Luíza, and João Feres Júnior. As Cúpulas do BRICS na grande mídia brasileira. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, September 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/manchetrometro.2020.0014.
Full textPapa, Mihaela. Is BRICS offering an alternative model for global governance? East Asia Forum, April 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.59425/eabc.1712052000.
Full text