To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: BRICS.
Journal articles on the topic 'BRICS'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'BRICS.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
K Jha, Sanjay. "Have the Bricks of BRICS Started Decaying?" International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) 12, no. 5 (May 5, 2023): 822–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.21275/sr23510195907.
Full text
2
Shah Zainal Abidin, Irwan, Muhammad Haseeb, Lee Wen Chiat, and Md Rabiul Islam. "Determinants of Malaysia – BRICS trade linkages: gravity model approach." Investment Management and Financial Innovations 13, no. 2 (July 14, 2016): 389–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.13(2-2).2016.14.
Full textAbstract:
The main objective of this study is to explore the long-run and short-run relationship between trade and other macroeconomic variables of Malaysian and the BRICS countries. To test relationship between trade and other macroeconomic variables, the empirical investigation will be conducted based on the dynamic ordinary least square (DOLS) and fully modify ordinary least square (FMOLS) model for the period 1980-2015. Results of both DOLS and FMOLS show that out of all the variables included in the model distance between Malaysia and BRICS countries and corruption of both side have negative affect on bilateral trade between them. Whereas, GDP, GDP per capita and trade to GDP ratio are positively contribute in the bilateral trade. However, inflation and exchange rate of Malaysia and BRCIS countries have no effect on the bilateral trade between Malaysia and BRICS countries. The findings suggest that economic strengthening as the basis for increase in trade between Malaysia and BRICS members. Investment appears to be complementary to the trading relations in the Malaysia-BRICS case. The social capital also plays role in supporting the trade
3
Davis, Karen. "BRICS." Counterfutures 1 (March 1, 2016): 189. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/cf.v1i0.6451.
Full text
4
Sarkar, Urvashi. "BRICS." South Asian Survey 21, no. 1-2 (March 2014): 127–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0971523115592495.
Full text
5
Carvalho, Evandro Menezes de. "A segunda década do BRICS." Idéias 9, no. 2 (December 14, 2018): 265–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.20396/ideias.v9i2.8655191.
Full textAbstract:
Introdução: BRICS e a agenda reformista; 2) A agenda reformista pela vertente econômica para além dos contornos do BRICS: o Novo Banco de Desenvolvimento (NDB); 3) A agenda reformista pela vertente política para além dos contornos do BRICS: Diálogos de outreach e BRICS Plus; 4) A XI Cúpula do BRICS e o desafio intra-BRICS; 5) Considerações finais.
6
Andal, Aireen Grace T., and Ksenia G. Muratshina. "Adjunct rather than alternative in global governance: An examination of BRICS as an international bloc through the perception of its members." Social Science Information 61, no. 1 (January 27, 2022): 77–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/05390184211068012.
Full textAbstract:
This article is aimed at the analysis of the perceptions of BRICS member states – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa – on the role of BRICS as an actor in international politics. While numerous analyses of BRICS have already been provided, little attention has been given to the deliberate self-presentation of the group per country. As such, this work examines whether these countries themselves perceive the BRICS as a political body that offers an alternative to the Western political imaginary. The focus is on how the BRICS member states construct meanings of what BRICS is and put these perspectives into dialogue with each other. Through a critical discourse analysis, this work takes the official documents released by BRICS countries (e.g. texts and speeches) and examines how these documents reflect each BRICS country’s perception of BRICS as a group. Findings show that despite BRICS’ unified agenda and plans of action, considerable heterogeneity persists in the perceptions of each BRICS member country concerning the role of BRICS in the international community. The shared vision of the BRICS members remains reflective of the Western framework. However, while the BRICS bloc may not offer a full-fledged alternative politics to that of the West, it still offers an alternative reading of contemporary international politics. Considering also its current state as a group-in-progress, BRICS is significant for its adjunct role in global governance, not least through the differences between the countries and the uncertainty of its future, challenging how to examine historical transitions.
7
Lissovolik, Y. "BRICS Plus following the 2023 “expansion summit”." Pathways to Peace and Security, no. 2 (2023): 42–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/2307-1494-2023-2-42-52.
Full textAbstract:
The 2023 BRICS summit unleashed a major expansion by the bloc, with five new members joining the BRICS core on January 1, 2024. However, while the geopolitical weight of the grouping has increased, its economic agenda remains vague. Some of the large emerging markets are having second thoughts about joining BRICS. After the 2023 presidential elections, Argentina declared that it would not become a member of BRICS. More fundamentally, the rift between India and China needs to be bridged in order for the bloc to gain greater prominence across the Global South. BRICS needs an ambitious trade liberalization agenda that would favor developing economies. This may become the basis for the evolution of the BRICS+ platform through multiple trajectories, including the “integration of integrations” track among regional integration blocs of which BRICS countries are members. In the longer term, the BRICS and BRICS+ formats may be complemented by a BRICS++ format, with participation of developed economies, regional blocs, and their development institutions.
8
Miranda, Luiz Ricardo de, and Olavo De Oliveira Bittencourt Neto. "BRICS e o Meio Ambiente | BRICS and the Environment." Revista Justiça do Direito 32, no. 1 (May 15, 2018): 188–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.5335/rjd.v32i1.7044.
Full textAbstract:
BRICS e o Meio Ambiente Resumo: Este trabalho situa-se na encruzilhada em que temas pertencentes a áreas aparentemente distintas e incomunicáveis que passaram a se amalgamar de tal sorte que não se pode mais pensar de forma isolada em cada uma delas sem se considerar as repercussões nas demais: meio ambiente e desenvolvimento econômico. Neste estudo, objetiva-se abordar o comportamento de um grupo específico de países, o BRICS (Brasil, Rússia, Índia, China e África do Sul), frente às questões ambientais, sobretudo a difícil conciliação entre seu desejo de alcançar um novo patamar na economia internacional e o respeito às limitações materiais para realizar esse propósito. A fim de analisar a inserção da temática ambiental no âmbito desses países, parte-se da identificação dos principais elementos que envolvem a questão ambiental nos dias atuais para então analisar o comportamento do BRICS frente ao tema, destacando, afinal, a peculiar posição do Brasil. Palavras-chave: BRICS. Desenvolvimento. Meio ambiente. Proteção ambiental. ______ BRICS and the Environment Abstract: This work is situated exactly in the crossroad where subjects apparently belonging to different and incommunicable areas start to blend in such a way that one can no longer think in isolation about each of them without considering the repercussions in the other: environment and economic development. This article has as objective to address the behavior of a specific group of countries, BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa0, when confronted to environmental issues, especially the difficult conciliation between their desire to reach a new level in the international economy and the respect of the material limitations to accomplish it. To analyze the insertion of the environmental issue in these countries, we start with the identification of the main elements surrounding the environmental issue today and then analyze the behavior of BRICS regarding the subject, highlighting, after all, the peculiar position of Brazil. Keywords: BRICS. Development. Environment. Environmental protection.
9
Karn, Arodh Lal, and Rakshha Kumari Karn. "BRICS Dream: BRICS in International Stabilization and Reconstruction Efforts." OALib 03, no. 06 (2016): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102696.
Full text
10
Bacik, Gokhan. "Turkey and the BRICS: Can Turkey Join the BRICS?" Turkish Studies 14, no. 4 (December 2013): 758–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2013.861109.
Full text
11
Panova, Viktoriya. "Foreword." BRICS Journal of Economics 4, no. 1 (December 28, 2020): 4–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.38050/2712-7508-2020-1-4-1.
Full textAbstract:
Dear friends! Allow me to congratulate the winners of the Contest for BRICS Young Leaders whose papers are published in this special issue of the BRICS Journal of Economics, partner of the Contest. No doubt, these articles bring to the BRICS agenda the most promising projects for promoting practical cooperation among the youth of our five countries. The Contest for BRICS Young Leaders was held within the annual BRICS International School by the Russian National Committee on BRICS Research and supported by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, the Alexander Gorchakov Public Diplomacy Fund and other partner organizations. The BRICS International School was initially established to train young professionals in BRICS studies through educational experiences focusing on fostering the pentalateral partnership of the BRICS countries. As the project evolves, we are proud to say that it has been widely contributing to building the pool of talented youth from BRICS and beyond. On behalf of the Russian National Committee of BRICS Research, I would like to extend our gratitude and appreciation to the BRICS Journal of Economics for the support of the Contest as a part of the youth track within the Russian BRICS Chairmanship in 2020. Let me express my hope that the BRICS Journal of Economics will further expand its impact in promoting knowledge and cutting-edge research as one of the most forward-looking journals in the field of BRICS studies. Since the creation of BRICS in 2009, the participating countries have made a significant progress in economic, technological, social, and humanitarian development, and have strengthened their positions in the institutions of the global governance. During its first decade, efforts of the BRICS countries became one of the key factors in world politics and global economic development. This year Russia took over the Chairmanship in BRICS for the third time under the motto “BRICS Partnership for Global Stability, Shared Security and Innovative Growth.” Its main purpose was determined as raising standards and quality of life of the peoples of our five countries. The Chairmanship is built on the three pillars of BRICS strategic partnership — policy and security, economy and finance, and cultural and humanitarian contacts. As a part of its policy track, BRICS countries continued to promote universal principles of international law, central role of the United Nations in international affairs and contributed to forming of a more democratic and multilateral system of the global governance. Efforts of the BRICS countries within economic pillar focused on the renewal of the Strategy for BRICS Economic Partnership 2025. The new Strategy emphasized trade, The Quality of Competition Law Institutions and Enforcement 5 investment and finance, support of the digital economy and sustainable development as its priority areas. By adopting the Strategy, the five countries expressed their commitment to strengthen cooperation within the BRICS businesses communities, to facilitate the reform of the global trade and financial system, to advance cooperation within the BRICS Contingency Reserve Arrangement and the New Development Bank. The BRICS countries prioritized working in the fields of innovation and technology and addressing the challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, sustainable development, climate change, energy, infrastructure development and food security. Within the humanitarian track, Russia prioritized strengthening of people-to-people contacts with the development of the youth track one of its core tasks. The BRICS countries continued strengthening youth exchanges in the fields of science, technology and innovation, volunteerism and entrepreneurship. It is illustrated by the comprehensive support of youth initiatives within the Russian Chairmanship and reflected in the XII BRICS Summit Moscow Declaration. This year BRICS reached a number of practical agreements to support our economies to recover from the health crises. BRICS countries agreed to support small, medium and micro businesses to participate in international trade, to foster interbank cooperation and strengthen the role of the New Development Bank. Certainly, the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak affected the Russian BRICS Chairmanship this year. The global healthcare crises and its implications for BRICS became the cross-cutting issue of discussions within the meetings at all levels and all fields of our cooperation. As an example of BRICS response to this challenge, the BRICS countries agreed to establish an early warning system for epidemiological threats and to develop specific steps for the legal regulation of medical products that will improve our capacities to combat similar threats in the future. I am proud that the Contest for BRICS Young Leaders and the BRICS International School engaged so many capable young people to elaborate solutions addressing the most pressing issues for the global community. The innovative ideas to foster partnership and friendship among the peoples of BRICS proposed by the participants of these projects will bring a positive change. I am convinced that with the contribution of the young leaders to the BRICS agenda, we will be able to solve issues of international importance and to build a better world.
12
Ting, Zeng. "A comparative study of SCO and BRICS university unions’ development models." Moscow University Pedagogical Education Bulletin, no. 3 (September 30, 2019): 38–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.51314/2073-2635-2019-3-38-51.
Full textAbstract:
There are three universities in which China and Russia participate as important member countries in the existing regional international education alliance. They are the SCO University based on SCO, the BRICS Universities League (BRICS UL) and the BRICS Network University established by the BRICS countries. The SCO University, BRICS UL and the BRICS Network University are important mechanisms for the multilateral cooperation between the SCO and the BRICS countries. They have their own development models and characteristics. This paper reveals the background and main cooperation modes of the three universities, points out their main problems and proposes future development strategies.
13
Utkin, Nikolay, and Victor Shenshin. "ON THE CONSEQUENCES OF BRICS EXPANSION FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A MULTIPOLAR WORLD." LAW. SAFETY. EMERGENCY SITUATIONS 2024, no. 1 (April 17, 2024): 61–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.61260/2074-1626-2024-1-61-73.
Full textAbstract:
The authors describe the results of the 15th BRICS summit on August 22–24, 2023 in Johannesburg (South Africa). The article shows the prospects for the expansion of BRICS according to the «BRICS+» formula. From January 1, 2024, Egypt, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Ethiopia joined BRICS. The expansion of BRICS is shown as a geopolitical triumph for Russia.
The article analyzes the final declaration «Johannesburg-2», which was adopted following the BRICS summit on August 22–24, 2023 and enshrines the use of the national currency in trade and the collective solution of problems related to international debt.
The authors reviewed the opinions of top officials of the BRICS countries, new members, states wishing to join BRICS (the Republic of Belarus, Bolivia, Algeria, Venezuela), as well as the media on the expansion of BRICS, the principles of admitting new countries, the formation of a multipolar world, and the conduct of a special military operations in Ukraine, strengthening political cooperation between the BRICS countries, introducing a new unit of account (single currency).
14
Lissovolik, Yaroslav. "BRICS expansion: new geographies and spheres of cooperation. Editorial for special Issue." BRICS Journal of Economics 5, no. 1 (April 5, 2024): 5–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/brics-econ.5.e120071.
Full textAbstract:
Starting from January 1, 2024 the ranks of the BRICS grouping expanded to include new regional powers from the Global South. The paper aims to explore the implications of the new composition of the BRICS grouping for the vectors of its economic cooperation. The conclusion reached in the paper is that the widening of the ranks of the BRICS raises the importance of coordinating policies in the economic sphere, macroeconomic policy specifically, with particular attention to reforming the BRICS Contingent Reserve Arrangement (BRICS CRA). To estimate the prospects of the BRICS development after the expansion is to assist the group’s financial institutions, including the New Development Bank and the BRICS CRA, in the creation of a diversified array of policy instruments aimed at providing support for economic development of the expanded BRICS association members.
15
Astakhova, M. "SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION ACROSS THE BRICS." BRICS Law Journal 7, no. 1 (March 8, 2020): 4–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-1-4-26.
Full textAbstract:
The creation of the BRICS as a non-traditional international organization in the status of a global forum brings new meaning to the norm-setting of international organizations, including in the field of scientific cooperation. This paper aims to identify and analyze the up-to-date and complete normative framework of scientific cooperation across the BRICS which is a result of the BRICS norm-setting. The achievement of the stated aim is pursued through the identification of the distinctive features of the BRICS norm-setting by comparison with the norm-setting of traditional international intergovernmental organizations and by analysis of the BRICS regulations dealing with issues of scientific cooperation. Within the process of researching this subject the author analyzed the BRICS regulations of different levels from the Joint Statements of the BRICS Countries’ Leaders and the Summits Declarations to the BRICS working papers as aframework program. The main finding of the research is that the normative framework of scientific cooperation across the BRICS is a set of non-legally binding norms contained in the regulations adopted at the various meetings of national officials within the BRICS. This finding can contribute to a better understanding of the application of the BRICS norms.
16
Zhao, Huanyu, and Dries Lesage. "Explaining BRICS Outreach: Motivations and Institutionalization." International Organisations Research Journal 15, no. 2 (June 1, 2020): 93–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2020-02-05.
Full textAbstract:
This article examines and explains the outreach activity of the BRICS group of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. We focus on two research puzzles: a) the motivations and b) the form and degree of the institutionalization of BRICS outreach. We define outreach as collaborative interaction among BRICS and other actors within and outside the BRICS area and focus on outreach to governments of non-BRICS countries and national top officials representing regional organizations. First, we offer a theoretical framework based on the experiences of the Group of 7/8 (G7/8) and the Group of 20 (G20), considering both commonalities and differences with BRICS. Second, we provide a detailed empirical analysis of BRICS outreach over time. Third, we explain BRICS outreach in light of the theoretical framework and enrich it based on our findings. Methodologically, we draw empirical information from official documents, news media and academic literature. We argue that the outreach activity of a major power grouping is reflective of its internal cohesion, as well as of how it defines its own position in the world and how it is perceived by others. This research offers a timely contribution to the ongoing debate on BRICS and the under-researched BRICS outreach process as a part of the overall institutionalization of BRICS.
17
Atif, Muhammad, and Muqarrab Akbar. "BRICS and African Region Partnership: Challenges and Opportunities." Global Political Review IV, no. IV (December 30, 2019): 59–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2019(iv-iv).07.
Full textAbstract:
BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) has amplified its regional and global impact. The economic success of BRICS is a motivation to Africa because BRICS and African region have a similar historical background. The partnership between Africa and the BRICS has extended fresh drive and created ample interest in last decades because BRICS is playing an important role in international trade, investment and global governance. Growing economic relations of the BRICS with African region can be exemplary for global world. These relations are prospective of a suitable way of economic change and sustainable progress in the African region. The resource of African region makes many opportunities and challenges among BRICS- African regions partnership. The interest of western powers also prevail in the African region. This article commences a fair inquiry of the BRICS relation with African region, possible opportunities and challenges.
18
Aslanyürek, Gizem. "Does BRICS present multilateral bifurcation as an alternative to the West during the pandemic and global inflation crisis era?" BRICS Journal of Economics 4, no. 1 (April 5, 2023): 117–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/brics-econ.4.e99454.
Full textAbstract:
This paper gives an overview of cooperative activities between the BRICS countries and their internal projections. It also analyzes the BRICS engagement as a new, alternative global institution through the global governance and multilateralism policies of BRICS. It asserts that BRICS cooperation has presented its global political and economic policies and demonstrated the tendency to prove its global goal as more than a regional organization but a new worldwide alternative to the West-oriented global institutions and cooperation. While it analyzes the objectives of the internal and international projects and coordination of the BRICS, it also examines the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic process, ongoing global inflation, and the challenges that occur dependently as a case study. The paper analyzes the texts of BRICS Summit reports and investigates the issue of whether BRICS will create a new bifurcation (Wallerstein) and drive the global power transition by challenging the rigid Western-based world order through its discourse of creating multilateral and multi-polar global system based on inclusiveness and the spirit of openness (BRICS Summit, 2022). On the other hand, there is the reality of BRICS that still face serious challenges, particularly after the pandemic period. This paper contributes to BRICS’ multilateralism and inclusiveness discourse by introducing bifurcation theory as a theoretical frame to determine the vision and the action of the BRICS group despite many challenges.
19
Maryam, Javeria, Umer Jeelanie Banday, and Ashok Mittal. "Trade intensity and revealed comparative advantage: an analysis of Intra-BRICS trade." International Journal of Emerging Markets 13, no. 5 (November 29, 2018): 1182–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-09-2017-0365.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose In the recent international scenario, the rise of emerging economies, in particular, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) has gained ample of attention. The global trade flows of the BRICS countries have significantly increased during the last one-and-a-half decade. The purpose of this paper is to examine the intra-BRICS and BRICS–EU trade flows. Design/methodology/approach To study the intensity of trade among BRICS countries and with EU, the Trade Intensity Index is employed for the period 2001–2015. Balassa’s revealed comparative advantage (RCA) index is computed for the assessment of comparative advantages of exports by BRICS countries in the year 2015 in the global markets. A comparative analysis of export similarity is done for India and other BRICS countries in EU. Findings The findings of trade intensity showed large bilateral trade flows among BRICS member. Russia has emerged as the main trading partner with EU in BRICS. For the year 2015, the comparative study of RCA at HS-two digits and HS-four digits classification highlights marginal structural changes in the export composition of these countries. The analysis revealed that Brazil and Russia have comparative advantages in natural resource-based products, while India and China possessed comparative advantages in manufactured and processed products. The export similarity index shows the presence of competition between India and China in EU. Practical implications This paper highlights the need for closer cooperation to promote intra-BRICS trade and to make structural transformations in the basket of trading products by them to have trade benefits at large. Originality/value Numerous studies are available on bilateral trade of BRICS members. However, limited studies are available to get a holistic view of intra-BRICS trade. This paper is an attempt to examine the BRICS countries trade profile both at global levels and within the group.
20
Ahad Bhat, Mudaser, Aamir Jamal, and Mirza Nazrana Beg. "Trade Integration and Export Aspiration: Evidence from India’s Trade in Goods with BRICS Countries." Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies 13, no. 2 (December 22, 2022): 490–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/omee.2022.13.90.
Full textAbstract:
The purpose of this study was to examine the dynamics of trade between India and the BRICS countries as well as to gauge the relative strength of Indian exports to those nations. The trade integration patterns among BRICS countries were also analyzed. To quantify the extent to which India’s exports correspond to the needs of its BRICS counterparts, a novel export aspiration index was constructed. The index of trade integration patterns has also been employed to quantify India’s trade integration pattern with other BRICS members. Further, the gravity model of trade has been employed to analyze the fundamentals of India–BRICS trade. The export aspiration in individual BRICS countries shows a diverse pattern. However, India’s export aspiration in these countries has improved, although marginally in the long run. Such empirical evidence substantiates that the relative strength of India’s exports within its BRICS counterparts has marginally improved over time. Moreover, the trade integration index indicates a similar trade integration pattern among the BRICS countries and corroborates the presence of inter-industry trade. Added to the conventional variables of the gravity model, India’s outward multilateral trade resistance and BRICS inward multilateral trade resistance significantly promote India–BRICS trade. Hence, the relative strength of Indian exports will increase substantially if India’s commodity composition is diversified by including more commodities in its export baskets that correspond to the needs and changing conditions of the BRICS economies.
21
Rahman, Mohd Nayyer, Zeenat Fatima, and Nida Rahman. "Quantitative dynamics of intra-BRICS trade." BRICS Journal of Economics 4, no. 1 (December 28, 2020): 6–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.38050/2712-7508-2020-1-4-2.
Full textAbstract:
The study uses an augmented gravity model to analyse intra-BRICS trade flows and the potential for establishing economic cooperation. It examines trade relations between BRICS with the help of the gravity model of international trade. Panel data from 2000 to 2017 were reviewed for bloc analysis of 20 trade partners. The analysis of the intra-BRICS trade flows is based on the Heckscher-Ohlin model. The results obtained confirm that the intra-BRICS trade relations have a sound positive impact on economic performance in these countries. Market size and economic index have a beneficial effect on the intra-BRICS trade flows. Market size is very elastic to trade, while trade tariffs and taxes within BRICS are manageable. Hence, the intra-BRICS trade has the potential to create strong economic ties within the member countries, and cooperation between the BRICS countries can have a significant influence on the globalisation of the world economy.
22
Mantusov, Vladimir B. "Integration Processes and Cooperation of Russia with the BRICS Countries." Вестник Российской таможенной академии, no. 3 (2022): 9–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.54048/20727240_2022_03_09.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents an analysis of the current state of integration processes within the framework of the BRICS association. The factors contributing to the unification of countries into the BRICS organization and their development are considered, including: high rates of economic growth of the BRICS countries, a “critical mass” of resource potential, a large volume of the domestic market of goods and services, the coincidence of economic and political interests in the international arena. The main mechanisms of integration development and cooperation within the framework of the association are annual BRICS summits, meetings of heads of BRICS countries at various levels and their representatives, holding forums, seminars, scientific conferences and other events. It is shown that during the summits the common political and economic interests of the BRICS countries are revealed, joint solutions are developed. As a result of the summits, a number of agreements were reached, important agreements were signed, which indicates that the partnership between the BRICS countries has prospects and will develop. The cooperation of Russia with the BRICS countries in the economic and trade spheres of activity is considered. The objectives and regulatory legal framework of such cooperation are defined, the analysis of the existing trade and economic relations of Russia with each of the BRICS states is carried out, promising areas of interaction with the BRICS countries and the possibility of collective participation of BRICS in international organizations and regional integration associations, including the Eurasian Economic Union, are formed, emphasized the importance and relevance of the task of in-depth study of the economy, domestic and foreign policy of Russia’s BRICS partner states.
23
Kleshchenko, Liudmila Leonidovna. "Analytical Centers as an Element of BRICS "Soft Power" in Latin America." Мировая политика, no. 3 (March 2022): 11–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.25136/2409-8671.2022.3.38697.
Full textAbstract:
The subject of this study is the policy of "soft power" of the BRICS in Latin America, including its tool such as analytical centers. The purpose of the study is to determine the specifics of the activities of BRICS analytical centers in the studied region and their political functions. The relevance of the topic is due to the growing importance of multilateral institutions in the modern world, which necessitates the study of their activities and mechanisms of influence, including the policy of "soft power". The prospects for the expansion of the BRICS due to the entry of new participants depend, among other things, on the image of this institution, which serves as an additional factor in the relevance of studying the policy of "soft power" of the BRICS and its results. Research method: document analysis. As a result of the study, it was found that an important impetus for the creation of the BRICS analytical center in Brazil is the diversity of the BRICS countries, which necessitates their mutual study. The activity of the BRICS analytical center is aimed at studying ways to solve global problems, studying the BRICS countries, the countries of the Global South and their interaction. In addition to research, the Center sees as a task the exchange of information between the research structures of the BRICS countries, the promotion of the BRICS agenda. The author comes to the conclusion that the policy of "soft power" of the BRICS in Latin America is at the stage of formation. One of its elements is the activity of the BRICS Research and Development Center, which performs research, organizational and informational functions.
24
Lipatova, Nadezhda G., and Andrey R. Gladkov. "Mutual Recognition of the Status of an Authorized Economic Operator as a Mechanism for Facilitating Russian-Chinese trade." Вестник Российской таможенной академии, no. 3 (2022): 24–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.54048/20727240_2022_03_24.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents an analysis of the current state of integration processes within the framework of the BRICS association. The factors contributing to the unification of countries into the BRICS organization and their development are considered, including: high rates of economic growth of the BRICS countries, a “critical mass” of resource potential, a large volume of the domestic market of goods and services, the coincidence of economic and political interests in the international arena. The main mechanisms of integration development and cooperation within the framework of the association are annual BRICS summits, meetings of heads of BRICS countries at various levels and their representatives, holding forums, seminars, scientific conferences and other events. It is shown that during the summits the common political and economic interests of the BRICS countries are revealed, joint solutions are developed. As a result of the summits, a number of agreements were reached, important agreements were signed, which indicates that the partnership between the BRICS countries has prospects and will develop. The cooperation of Russia with the BRICS countries in the economic and trade spheres of activity is considered. The objectives and regulatory legal framework of such cooperation are defined, the analysis of the existing trade and economic relations of Russia with each of the BRICS states is carried out, promising areas of interaction with the BRICS countries and the possibility of collective participation of BRICS in international organizations and regional integration associations, including the Eurasian Economic Union, are formed, emphasized the importance and relevance of the task of in-depth study of the economy, domestic and foreign policy of Russia’s BRICS partner states.
25
Lagutina, M. L. "Regional Dimensions of BRICS Cooperation." Journal of International Analytics 13, no. 1 (March 28, 2022): 66–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-1-66-82.
Full textAbstract:
Since the beginning, BRICS has been viewed as an element of global governance system. Recently, however, it became necessary to adapt the BRICS format to the new challenges of the world system, not only at the global, but also at the regional levels, as a result of which not only global cooperation mechanisms, but also regional ones, were involved in the activities of the BRICS. BRICS-initiated regional outreach practices and “BRICS+” format are aimed at expanding partnerships, the socalled “circle of friends” of the BRICS, both within the BRICS subregions and beyond. These partners include as national states, as regional organizations. Both formats are focused on reforming the global fi nancial and economic system and the formation of a polycentric world order based on the principles of pluralism and diversity, involving not only developed but also developing countries of the “Global South” in the global governance system. The purpose of this article is to consider various approaches to the study of the BRICS from the standpoint of the theories of “new” and “comparative” regionalism and to assess the prospects for regional interaction of the BRICS countries at the level of subregional, interregional and transregional ties.
26
Lissovolik, Ya D. "BRICS-Plus: the New Force in Global Governance." Journal of International Analytics 14, no. 1 (April 14, 2023): 138–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-1-138-148.
Full textAbstract:
The global economy is currently experiencing unprecedented changes as the BRICS nations establish themselves as a signifi cant power center and a crucial factor in the transformation of the international economic framework. Following China’s chairmanship of BRICS, which culminated in the BRICS+ meetings with a diverse range of emerging market economies, these and other countries have expressed their desire to join the BRICS group. The expansion process was largely catalyzed by the openness exhibited by BRICS through the BRICS+ format. The main question at this juncture is how the BRICS+ format will develop and whether it can enhance the position of BRICS in the global arena and among the Global South. This paper explores some of the opportunities presented by the BRICS+ concept in the creation of new global governance, particularly through the establishment of platforms – including those in the real sector and fi nancial platforms aimed at promoting greater cooperation among the sovereign wealth funds and regional development banks of the Global South. Another critical area is the launch of a new reserve currency that could serve as the foundation for greater economic integration across the broad platform of the developing world.
27
Manyaapelo, Olerato. "Future of the BRICS and the Role of Russia and China." African Journal of Political Science 11, no. 1 (February 9, 2024): 97–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.36615/jqkgdz86.
Full textAbstract:
The rise of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) and the severity of the 2008 global financial crisis have sparked a new round of debate about the long-term viability of transatlantic norms, ideas , and institutions that have dominated global governance since its commencement. Many of the bodies and organizations that contribute towards global governance were formed between 1945 and 1980 , and have been dominated by Western actors and an agenda centered on the West. To support the main argument of the author there are various chapters in the book Future of the BRICS and the Role of Russia and China that focus on The Evolution of Brics and the international system, Russia and BRICS, China and BRICS and Russia and China in BRICS: Convergences and Divergences. The strength of this book is that it is based on empirical evidence and it address pertinent questions on BRICS , contemporary international relations and monetary institutions. Most importantly, the book sheds light on the future of BRICS and the international financial system by providing a clear overview of BRICS and Unipolar and Bipolar world order systems.
28
Kheyfets, B. "Prospects of BRICS institutionalization." Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 8 (August 20, 2015): 25–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-8-25-42.
Full textAbstract:
The article discusses the features and stages of institutionalization of BRICS that becomes a real player in world politics and economics. There are 4 models of further institutionalization of BRICS, which will be combined with each other. A promising model that involves the creation of new BRICS institutions, providing a multiple effect on the development of the association, is noted. Among such institutions BRICS Bank for International Settlements and the Free Trade and Investments Zone of BRICS are offered.
29
Окунева, Л. С. "Глобальная проекция BRICS." Латинская Америка, no. 4 (2012): 55–71.
Find full text
30
Galli, Rosemary. "Challenging BRICS mythology." Tensões Mundiais 11, no. 21 (October 5, 2018): 287–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.33956/tensoesmundiais.v11i21.457.
Full text
31
Baumann, Renato, and Laurent Amelot. "Brésil : entre BRICS." Outre-Terre N° 42, no. 1 (2015): 288. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/oute1.042.0288.
Full text
32
Jordaan, André C. "BRICS – quo vadis?" Development Southern Africa 38, no. 3 (January 18, 2021): 454–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0376835x.2020.1870932.
Full text
33
Gladun, E. "BRICS GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES." BRICS Law Journal 4, no. 1 (January 1, 2017): 100–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-1-100-104.
Full text
34
Astakhov, E. "BRICS: LATINAMERICAN PROJECTION." Cuadernos Iberoamericanos, no. 1 (March 28, 2016): 62–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.46272/2409-3416-2016-1-62-66.
Full textAbstract:
The paper analyses recent trends in foreign policy of Latin-American countries, in particular their approaches to the cooperation with BRICS. The main attention is paid to the analysis of Brazilian policy towards BRICS. Brazil is the only country which represents Latin-American continent in BRICS and has excellent possibilities to enter “the club of the Great Powers”.
35
Carvalho, Mônica Rocha de. "Entre dois BRICs." GV-executivo 6, no. 5 (October 3, 2007): 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.12660/gvexec.v6n5.2007.34685.
Full textAbstract:
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;">O espantoso crescimento econômico chinês vem atraindo expressivos volumes de capital para seus mercados. O país vem institucionalizando práticas de governança corporativa ainda que, na prática, a estrutura de propriedade das empresas esbarre na presença maciça do estado controlador. O artigo compara os mercados de capitais de Brasil e China à luz da atratividade desses mercados como opção de alocação de recursos.</p>
36
Wansleben, Leon. "‘Dreaming with BRICs’." Journal of Cultural Economy 6, no. 4 (November 2013): 453–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2012.756826.
Full text
37
Peterson, Don. "Transduction and BRICS." Manuscrito 38, no. 3 (December 2015): 15–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2015.v38n3.dp.
Full text
38
Pant, Harsh V. "The BRICS Fallacy." Washington Quarterly 36, no. 3 (August 2013): 91–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163660x.2013.825552.
Full text
39
CERQUEIRA FILHO, G. "BRICS Law Journal." Passagens: Revista Internacional de História Política e Cultura Jurídica 10, no. 1 (February 5, 2018): 150–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-201810109.
Full text
40
V. Glebov. "BRICS Enlargement Prospects." International Affairs 69, no. 003 (June 30, 2023): 123–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.21557/iaf.86095818.
Full text
41
Toni Júnior, Claúdio Noel de. "BRICS e pandemia." Journal on Innovation and Sustainability RISUS 14, no. 1 (March 27, 2023): 104–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2023v14i1p104-112.
Full textAbstract:
O presente artigo possui como atributos de investigação, a continuação do diálogo de Toni Junior (2014) sobre globalização e tendências do BRICS, no que tange duas vertentes: o neo-regionalismo mencionado por Hurrell (1995), onde mostra o ressurgimento do regionalismo na política mundial, onde os mais fortes detêm a hegemonia , bem como as particularidades destas nações tão distantes da realidade cultural, econômica e de progresso técnico está fazendo para conter a disseminação do Sars- Covid 19 neste momento, o que já foi feito até o presente e seu desenrolar durante o ano de 2020, ao mostrar realidades opostas entre as nações e sua realidade e qual é fundamentalmente o norteador que mantém o bloco, dada as discrepâncias e mudanças governamentais nos países que o compõe na nova ordem mundial de blocos regionais com embasamento do novo neo-regionalismo mundial e sua real eficácia na ajuda e na cooperação econômica e social entre as nações nesta época onde o mundo “parou” em razão de um vírus.
42
Panova, Victoria. "BRICS Security Agenda and Prospects for the BRICS Ufa Summit." International Organisations Research Journal 10, no. 2 (2015): 119–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2015-02-119.
Full text
43
Shubin, Vladimir. "WHY SOUTH AFRICA NEEDS BRICS, WHY BRICS NEEDS SOUTH AFRICA." Security Index: A Russian Journal on International Security 19, no. 3 (September 2013): 33–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19934270.2013.814951.
Full text
44
Shoba, Muzi. "An Appraisal of EU and BRICS Relations: Lessons for BRICS." Journal of African Foreign Affairs 10, no. 1 (April 1, 2023): 7–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.31920/2056-5658/2023/v10n1a1.
Full text
45
Guo, Shuyong, Yulin Sun, and Pavel Demidov. "The Role of BRICS in International Development Assistance." International Organisations Research Journal 15, no. 2 (June 1, 2020): 125–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2020-02-06.
Full textAbstract:
With their growing economic power and international influence, the BRICS group of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa are paying increasing attention to international development assistance. Although the BRICS countries started later than western developed countries, the speed of their development is staggering and their share in foreign aid is gradually increasing. The BRICS countries continue to innovate forms of assistance and cooperation in their own international development assistance, to strengthen cooperation with recipient countries, and to plan their own foreign aid work through the establishment of relevant institutions and the publication of relevant documents. But, at the same time, the BRICS countries are facing certain challenges in the process of international development assistance. This article examines the historical practice of BRICS’ international development assistance, analyzes the role BRICS plays in international development assistance, and considers the future prospects for BRICS’ participation.
46
Ignatov, Aleksandr. "The Digital Economy of BRICS: Prospects for Multilateral Cooperation." International Organisations Research Journal 15, no. 1 (April 5, 2020): 31–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2020-01-02.
Full textAbstract:
The growth of the digital economy has become the most significant trend in global development. The digital economy creates new impetuses for economic growth, but at the same time it deepens global inequality and impacts the growth of countries of the global South. The role of global governance institutions such as the BRICS grouping of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa — the main representative of developing countries in global governance — in the promotion of digital growth has not yet been fully explored. There is also some ambiguity concerning the development level of the digital economy in particular countries. In the context of Russia’s third BRICS presidency in 2020, issues of digital development in BRICS have become particularly relevant. The author analyzes current indicators of digital development in the BRICS countries, drawing on several existing methodologies, ratings, and decisions made by BRICS on issues of digital growth and levels of compliance, and makes recommendations for the further development of BRICS’ digital agenda. According to data provided by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the World Bank, the World Economic Forum (WEF), the European Union (EU) and the International Development Institute (IDI), the BRICS countries differ in terms of the maturity of their digital economies. They are characterized by a relatively low quality and affordability of digital infrastructure; additionally, the penetration of information and communications technology (ICT) into business and daily activities in BRICS countries lags behind the world leaders, and data on the quality and efficiency of regulatory and innovative frameworks in the BRICS countries is insufficient. However, decisions made by BRICS on matters of digital growth are followed with a high-average level of compliance. Thus, recommendations for the further development of BRICS’ digital agenda are strategic in nature. The author defines three promising areas of cooperation on digital matters during Russia’s 2020 BRICS presidency: facilitation of dialog and exchange of best practices supporting digital growth; development of a common BRICS standard offor the production of digital goods and services and; promotion of a common BRICS position on cybersecurity issues
47
Beletskaya, Maria. "BRICS labor markets: Competing with the largest economy." BRICS Journal of Economics 3, no. 2 (July 21, 2022): 75–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/brics-econ.3.e85970.
Full textAbstract:
This article presents an overview of the labor market development and employment in the BRICS countries. Being among the largest world economies, the BRICS countries are making serious efforts to ensure the sustainability of their labor markets, increase employment opportunities for the population and promote human-centered and inclusive policies based on a decent work approach. The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the BRICS labor markets and highlighted the need for its formalization to ensure the protection of workers’ rights. The countries’ national circumstances are different and so are the specific priorities of the governments in their labor market policies. BRICS cooperation on labor and employment issues allows to exchange experience, knowledge and best practices in addressing various labor market and employment challenges. Based on the discussions of the labor market situations, the BRICS member countries fine-tune their labor policies and actions. The article concludes that BRICS cooperation on labor and employment issues has become an integral part of the collaboration of the BRICS countries. The cooperation agenda will deepen the understanding of various labor market peculiarities and reinforce the solidarity actions of the BRICS countries in the field of labor and employment in the global arena. A comparison of the emerging BRICS economies with the developed and biggest economy of the world reveals that the BRICS countries have made faster progress in their efforts to restore their labor markets after the COVID-19 outbreak.
48
Atabekova, Anastasia, Rimma Gorbatenko, and Tatyana Shoustikova. "Multimodal Discourse on BRICS Produced by Diverse Stakeholders: Identifying Attitudes, Cultures and Perspectives." Space and Culture, India 7, no. 5 (May 8, 2020): 49–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i5.670.
Full textAbstract:
The paper explores the conceptual vision of BRICS in the contemporary world. The study focuses on language and images that are used within BRICS-related institutional communication. We argue that the research is important because of the increasing impact of BRICS on the development of the multilateral and multipolar world. The research aims to offer preliminary considerations with regard to key topics, features and tools of multimodal discourse that comes from the BRICS nations and representatives of other international/regional organisations. This area has not been subject to academic analysis so far. This confirms the novelty of the present study.
The research material includes 600 image-text correlated items from BRICS official sources of information and from organisation and institutions, which are not affiliated with the BRICS and refer to national or international actors. The research combined theoretical analysis of literature, empirical investigation of materials within qualitative paradigm, through content-based analysis and manual coding on thematic and pragmatic criteria.
The findings reveal different approaches to BRICS that are introduced by different actors through specific coordination of verbal and visual tools, in explicit and implicit ways. The findings show that BRICS sources contain proportioned use of texts and photos of high-ranking official events, socio-cultural features of BRICS countries, and pictures of youth with regard to BRICS mission, values, goals, and policies. This strengthens the concept of equality and human rights provision in the modern world in general and leads to the understanding of the need to include the issues of youth rights and their equality on the BRICS agenda in an explicit way.
49
Gehre, Thiago. "The history of BRICS' International Relations (2009-2019): discourses, innovation and senstitivities." Conjuntura Austral 11, no. 53 (March 26, 2020): 161–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.22456/2178-8839.97954.
Full textAbstract:
O artigo discute os principais movimentos históricos das relações internacionais do BRICS entre 2009 e 2019: o surgimento de narrativas sobre o sucesso e o fracasso do BRICS; a capacidade do BRICS de promover inovações na ordem global e a capacidade de resposta do BRICS a uma variedade de temas, o que reflete-se no conceito de “cooperação sob sensibilidade”. Novos nichos de diálogo produtivo (saúde, segurança, desenvolvimento) nas relações internacionais do BRICS criaram circunstâncias de interações sensíveis entreos países, causando controvérsia e rusgas diplomáticas que afetaram os laços bilaterais e multilaterais entre os países do BRICS. Metodologicamente, ele se baseia em múltiplas abordagens que combinam Análise Qualitativa de Conteúdo (QCA), Análise de Política Externa (APF), Pensamento Crítico e uma perspectivahistórica de relações internacionais, com base em forte empiria e uso de fontes primárias e secundárias - incluindo notícias, discurso das autoridades e telegramas oficiais do Itamaraty e os estudos científicos mais recentes sobre o BRICS.
50
Nie, Qing. "Analysis of Economic Effects of the Establishment of the Brics Free Trade Zone —Based On the Gtap-E Model." International Journal of Business & Management Studies 04, no. 02 (February 12, 2023): 30–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.56734/ijbms.v4n2a4.
Full textAbstract:
The international regional economic integration is developing to a broader and higher standard. The BRICS countries have been cooperating for a long time. As the representatives of the emerging economies of the world, the establishment of a free trade zone by the BRICS can not only promote economic and trade growth among the BRICS members, but also help the developing countries to speak in the new round of international economic and trade rules reshaping. Based on the above background, this paper uses the GTAP-E model to simulate the economic effects of the BRICS free trade area with the zero tariff and exception sectors scenarios to simulate the expected economic effects of the BRICS free trade area. The construction of the BRICS free trade zone has brought different impacts on different industries of member countries, and the overall optimization and adjustment in the direction of their respective comparative advantages. Resource integration in the industrial sector can increase productivity in BRICS countries.