Relevant bibliographies by topics / Brief Pain Inventory

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Book chapters
  4. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Brief Pain Inventory'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 29 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Brief Pain Inventory.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Brief Pain Inventory"

1

Stanhope, Jessica. "Brief Pain Inventory review." Occupational Medicine 66, no. 6 (April 11, 2016): 496–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqw041.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Halpern, Casey H., Sukhmeet Sandhu, Venus BS Vakhshori, Keyvan Mirsaeedi-Farahani, Marie Kerr, and John YK Lee. "179 Brief Pain Inventory-Facial." Neurosurgery 60 (August 2013): 179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000432769.13106.ff.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Poquet, Nolwenn, and Christine Lin. "The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)." Journal of Physiotherapy 62, no. 1 (January 2016): 52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2015.07.001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Klepstad, Pål, Jon Håvard Loge, Petter C. Borchgrevink, Tito R. Mendoza, Charles S. Cleeland, and Stein Kaasa. "The Norwegian Brief Pain Inventory Questionnaire." Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 24, no. 5 (November 2002): 517–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00526-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Sandhu, Sukhmeet K., Casey H. Halpern, Venus Vakhshori, Keyvan Mirsaeedi-Farahani, John T. Farrar, and John Y. K. Lee. "Brief Pain Inventory–Facial minimum clinically important difference." Journal of Neurosurgery 122, no. 1 (January 2015): 180–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2014.8.jns132547.

Full text
Abstract:
OBJECT Neurosurgeons are frequently the primary physicians measuring pain relief in patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Unfortunately, the measurement of pain can be complex. The Brief Pain Inventory–Facial (BPI-Facial) is a reliable and validated multidimensional tool that consists of 18 questions. It measures 3 domains of pain: 1) pain intensity (worst and average pain intensity), 2) interference with general activities of daily living (ADL), and 3) face-specific pain interference. The objective of this paper is to determine the patient-reported minimum clinically important difference (MCID) using the BPI-Facial. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective study of 234 patients with TN seen in a single neurosurgeon's office. Patients completed baseline and 1-month follow-up BPI-Facial questionnaires. The MCID was calculated using an anchor-based approach in which the defined anchor was the 7-point patient global impression of change (PGIC). Two statistical methods were employed: mean change score and optimal cutoff point. RESULTS Using the mean change score method, the investigators calculated the MCID for the 3 domains of the BPIFacial: 44% and 30% improvement in pain intensity at its worst and average, respectively, 54% improvement in interference with general ADL, and 63% improvement in interference with facial ADL. Using the optimal cutoff point method, they also calculated the MCID for the 3 domains of the BPI-Facial: 57% and 28% improvement in pain intensity at its worst and average, respectively, 75% improvement in interference with general ADL, and 62% improvement in interference with facial ADL. CONCLUSIONS The BPI-Facial is a multidimensional pain scale that measures 3 domains of pain. Although 2 statistical methods were used to calculate the MCID, the optimal cutoff point method was the superior one because it used data from the majority of subjects included in this study. A 57% improvement in pain intensity at its worst and a 28% improvement in pain intensity at its average were the MCIDs for patients with facial pain. A greater improvement was needed to achieve the MCID for interference with general and facial ADL. A 75% improvement in interference with general ADL and a 62% improvement in interference with facial ADL were needed to achieve an MCID. While pain intensity is easier to measure, pain's interference with ADL may be more important for patient outcomes when designing or evaluating interventions in the field of TN. The BPI-Facial is a useful instrument to measure changes in multidimensional aspects of pain in patients with TN.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Mystakidou, Kyriaki, Tito Mendoza, Eleni Tsilika, Sofia Befon, Efi Parpa, George Bellos, Lambros Vlahos, and Charles Cleeland. "Greek Brief Pain Inventory: Validation and Utility in Cancer Pain." Oncology 60, no. 1 (December 28, 2000): 35–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000055294.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Tan, Gabriel, Mark P. Jensen, John I. Thornby, and Bilal F. Shanti. "Validation of the brief pain inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain." Journal of Pain 5, no. 2 (March 2004): 133–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kalyadina, Svetlana A., Tatyana I. Ionova, Maria O. Ivanova, Olga S. Uspenskaya, Anton V. Kishtovich, Tito R. Mendoza, Hong Guo, Andrei Novik, Charles S. Cleeland, and Xin S. Wang. "Russian Brief Pain Inventory: Validation and Application in Cancer Pain." Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 35, no. 1 (January 2008): 95–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.042.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Bennett, Michael I. "The Brief Pain Inventory: revealing the effect of cancer pain." Lancet Oncology 10, no. 10 (October 2009): 1020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70114-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Ferreira, Karine A., Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, Tito R. Mendonza, and Charles S. Cleeland. "Validation of brief pain inventory to Brazilian patients with pain." Supportive Care in Cancer 19, no. 4 (March 10, 2010): 505–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0844-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Brief Pain Inventory"

1

Mahan, Farrah R. B. A. "Pain and Fatigue Associated with Generalized Joint Hypermobility in Gaucher Disease." University of Cincinnati / OhioLINK, 2018. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1525168102345918.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Pinheiro, Patrícia Micaela Silva. "Quantificação do cortisol plasmático e uso da escala de avaliação de dor Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI) para comparação da eficácia de três protocolos medicamentosos no controlo da dor osteoarticular em cães." Master's thesis, Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/18462.

Full text
Abstract:
Dissertação de Mestrado Integrado em Medicina Veterinária
A doença articular degenerativa (DDA) constitui a causa de dor crónica mais frequentemente identificada em cães geriátricos. O presente estudo pretendeu avaliar comparativamente a eficácia de 3 protocolos analgésicos no controlo da dor em cães com DDA. Utilizou-se uma amostra de 18 cães (N=18) de ambos os géneros, avaliados em consulta com uma condição de DDA. A amostra foi dividida aleatoriamente em 3 grupos diferentes de acordo com o protocolo analgésico utilizado: A) Carprofeno, B) Carprofeno + Tramadol, C) Carprofeno + Gabapentina. Para avaliar o grau de dor do animal realizou-se a quantificação da concentração de cortisol plasmático, e a escala de dor Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI), ambos em 2 tempos: T0 (momento da consulta inicial) e T1 (2 semanas após o início do protocolo). De acordo com os resultados não foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre a variação de cortisol T0-T1 de cada doente (p=0.528), os valores de CBPI T0-T1 de cada doente (F=0.218), e os 3 protocolos analgésicos estudados. Todos os protocolos medicamentosos demonstraram eficácia equiparável na redução do nível de dor dos animais avaliados, apresentando valores de cortisol plasmático e pontuação na escala de dor CBPI inferiores pós-realização dos protocolos analgésicos relativamente aos obtidos inicialmente.
ABSTRACT - PLASMATIC CORTISOL QUANTIFICATION AND APPLICATION OF THE CANINE BRIEF PAIN INVENTORY (CBPI) PAIN SCORING SCALE FOR COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THREE MEDICAL PROTOCOLS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF OSTEOARTICULAR PAIN IN DOGS - Degenerative joint disease (DJD) is the most commonly diagnosed source of pain in geriatric dogs. The current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of 3 analgesic protocols in pain managing of dogs with DJD. The study used a sample of 18 dogs (N=18) of both genders, evaluated in a clinical setting with a DJD disease. The sample was randomly assorted in 3 different groups according to the pain management protocol used: A) Carprofen, B) Carprofen + Tramadol, C) Carprofen + Gabapentin. The pain assessment was made through the evaluation of plasmatic cortisol levels and the Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI) scale, both performed in two different time points: T0 (during the first clinical assessment) and T1 (2 weeks after starting the pain management protocol). According to the obtained results, no statistically significant differences were found amongst each patient’s cortisol variation T0-T1 (p=0.528), each patient’s CBPI T0-T1 scores (F=0.218) and the 3 studied pain management protocols. All the studied protocols expressed equivalent impact in the decreasing of the pain levels on the patients, whom show lower plasmatic cortisol levels and scores on CBPI after the introduction of the pain management protocols when compared to the initial assessments.
N/A
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Su, Sheng-Fang, and 蘇聖芳. "Explore Low Back Pain and Associated Factors of Caregiver Working in Disability Welfare Institutions: Brief Pain Inventory-Pain Interference Survey." Thesis, 2014. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/70435452518643520897.

Full text
Abstract:
碩士
國防醫學院
公共衛生學研究所
102
Background: LBP is a common health problems occur in everydaily life, especially more important for caregivers who working in disability welfare institutions. In addition, LBP not only affects the caregiver’s own health, quality of life, efficiency of work, but also indirectly affect the quality of care for their care clients. Objectives: This study aims to exam the prevalence of LBP condition and pain interference situation of institutional caregivers, and to explore the determinants of their LBP and pain interference related factors. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from 1 August to 31 October, 2013. We used a purposive sampling method to choose the institutional caregivers excluding substitute for the study based on the proportion of the institutions in the four geographic areas of Taiwan. We mailed 1199 questionnaires were distributed to the caregivers among the 15 institutions, and included an introduction letter, an informed consent, and a structured questionnaire that queried the caregivers’ demographic and working characteristics, healthy lifestyle, LBP experiences with Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ), and pain interference conditions with Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) in this survey. Finally, 1073 valid questionnaires were returned, with a response rate of 89.5%. And the data was analyzed by SPSS 20.0 software in this study. Results: The present study results showed that 63.2% of the participants reported that they had LBP in the previous year. The factors of female gender, being married, being direct care staff, having fair health status, previous and recent more medication experience of musculoskeletal discomfort were found to be more likely to have LBP than their counterparts in logistic regression analyze. In the pain interference conditions, the mean score of the totally pain interference was 17.4 (total 70 score) among the LBP caregivers. The distribution of affected interference situations were mostly mild disturbance, and most of the interference problems had sleep, mood, and normal work. This study also found that many working conditions and LBP experienced significantly correlated with pain interference among the caregivers (R2=41.7%). Conclusions: This study found that the prevalence of LBP of the caregivers was high in disability welfare institutions, and working patterns affected the LBP occurrence and its interference. This study highlights that the governments and workplaces should pay much attentions to the high prevalence of LBP and their consequence to daily living interferences among caregivers working for person with disabilities.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Sousa, Mónica Manuela Moreira. "O Inventário Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition (BRIEF-2): Estudo Exploratório das Propriedades Psicométricas da Versão Pais." Master's thesis, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/94478.

Full text
Abstract:
Dissertação de Mestrado Integrado em Psicologia apresentada à Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação
Nas últimas décadas, tem-se verificado um interesse crescente pelas funções executivas, sendo que estas integram um conjunto de diferentes processos neurocognitivos que são determinantes para atingir um objetivo específico, permitindo o planeamento, a monitorização e a regulação do comportamento humano.Este estudo exploratório teve como principal objetivo contribuir para a validação para a população portuguesa de um inventário de funções executivas, nomeadamente, o Inventário de Avaliação Comportamental de Funções Executivas - 2ª Edição, Versão Pais (BRIEF-2, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition; Gioia, Isquith, Guy, & Kenworthy, 2015).Foram realizadas análises no âmbito da precisão através do estudo da consistência interna (alfa de Cronbach) e da validade de construto (análise fatorial exploratória e confirmatória), com base numa amostra composta por 437 participantes.Os resultados revelam valores aceitáveis e muitos bons de consistência interna em todas as escalas clínicas e valores muitos bons nos três índices e no Compósito Global Executivo. No que se refere à estrutura do inventário, o modelo fatorial que melhor se adequou foi o modelo de dois fatores, que explicou 69.47% da variância total. No entanto, este modelo difere da versão norte-americana (estrutura fatorial de 3 fatores). Efetuou-se, ainda, uma análise fatorial confirmatória que demonstrou que a análise dos índices de ajustamento confirma que os dados empíricos se ajustam à estrutura original de 3 fatores.Em suma, os resultados observados neste estudo exploratório revelam robustez psicométrica e indicam que o BRIEF-2 poderá ser uma boa escolha para o estudo das funções executivas nas crianças e jovens portugueses com idades compreendidas entre os 6 e os 18 anos.
In the last decades, there has been a growing interest in executive functions, which integrate a set of different neurocognitive processes, crucial to achieve a specific objective, allowing the visualization, monitoring and regulation of human behavior.This exploratory study’s main objective was to contribute to the validation of an executive functions inventory in the Portuguese population, namely, the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition, Parent Version (BRIEF-2; Gioia, Isquith, Guy, & Kenworthy, 2015).Precision data were analyzed through the study of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and construct validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis), based on a sample composed of 437 participants.The results reveal acceptable and very good values of internal consistency in all scales and very good values in the three indices and in the Global Executive Composite. Regarding the structure of the event, the factorial model that best fits is the two-factor model, which explained 69.47% of the total variation. However, this model differs from the North American version (3-factor factorial structure). A confirmatory factor analysis was also carried out, which revealed that the analysis of the adjustment indexes confirms that the empirical data fit the original 3-factor structure.In summary, the results observed in this exploratory study reveal psychometric robustness and indicate that BRIEF-2 can be a good choice for the study of executive functions in Portuguese children and youths aged between 6 and 18 years.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Hashim, Che Gon. "Identifying predictors of postoperative persistent pain in women with breast cancer: assessments of investigative tools." Master's thesis, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/162744.

Full text
Abstract:
Persistent pain after surgery in breast cancer has a significant impact on the patient’s survival. The value of escalating research on breast cancer in Malaysia cannot be underestimated. However, it is not known how many of these women experience persistent pain after surgery. This study surveyed previously unknown figures on prevalence, and explored the predictive factors of persistent pain women with breast cancer in Malaysia. There were three objectives. First, to assess the reliability of the already established investigative tools, namely, the Brief Pain Inventory, Distress Thermometer, and Resilience scale RS-14; second, to survey the prevalence of persistent pain; and thirdly to identify predictors of persistent pain in women after breast surgery, using the above measures. A test and retest design with no intervention and a recall period of 3 to 7 days was employed for assessment of the investigative tools. A cross-sectional study, with a prospective, correlational design, a retrospective review of medical records was used to identify predictors of persistent pain. These investigations were conducted in two phases –Section A and Section B – using separate data sets, with different inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants were recruited from the University of Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia. Descriptive statistics, a stepwise regression model for reliability testing, Cronbach alpha, and factor analysis were used. This study divided pain into categories 0 = no pain, 1–4 = mild pain, 5–6 = moderate pain, and 7–10 = severe pain. Section A: The tools were found reliable. Section B: A total of 123 participants were recruited; 119 participants remained because 4 of them did not meet the inclusion criteria. A total of 43% of the participants had persistent pain (n = 51). Pain interfered with their work, mood, and sleep. Based on a “Yes” answer for pain today (n = 51), data were analysed to determine predictors. The results revealed three predictors: distress, B = –.911, resilience, B = –.444, and pain interference, B = .309. The model was statistically significant, F (3, 41, 44) = 13.827, R2 = 0.267, .381, .467), and adjusted R2 = .250, .351, .467, p = 0.001. Significant P value ≤ .005. Pain prevalence was 43% in this Malaysian population. This study provided empirical evidence which is an important new knowledge to health care systems, health care providers, policy makers, and future research. The impact of persistent pain on work, mood, and sleep are justifiable medical concerns. The results obtained and identified predictors are catalysts for providing extra support for breast cancer women after surgery. Ideally, all women with breast cancer should have very good life satisfaction.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Brief Pain Inventory"

1

Shahid, Azmeh, Kate Wilkinson, Shai Marcu, and Colin M. Shapiro. "Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)." In STOP, THAT and One Hundred Other Sleep Scales, 81–88. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9893-4_13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Yvonne Buowari, Dabota. "Pain Management in Older Persons." In Update in Geriatrics. IntechOpen, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93940.

Full text
Abstract:
Pain is a common symptom in the elderly and it is problematic and distressful especially if the polder person is dependent on a caregiver. Pain keeps the sufferer uncomfortable and can affect the person from carrying out daily activities and tasks especially activities of daily living. Pain in the older person may be acute or chronic. Some of the causes of pain in the elderly are neuralgia, musculoskeletal dysfunction especially osteoarthritis, emotional and mental problems, cancer and several other causes. The assessment of pain in the elderly is done using validated pain assessment tools such as the visual analogue scale, verbal rating scales, numeric rating scales, McGill pain assessment questionnaire, pain attitudes, brief pain inventory, and geriatric pain measure. Management of pain in older persons involves non-pharmacological and pharmacological methods. There are some barriers and challenges of pain management in the elderly and also consequences when pain is not properly managed or not managed at all in an older person.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Curtin, John. "Pain management." In Oxford Handbook of Cancer Nursing, edited by Mike Tadman, Dave Roberts, and Mark Foulkes, 549–68. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198701101.003.0046.

Full text
Abstract:
Pain is described as being whatever the experiencing person says it is, and their perception of pain is determined by their mood and morale and the meaning of the pain for them. Cancer pain is common, and prevalence is related to the stage of the illness: 59% in patients undergoing treatment, and 64% in those with advanced disease. Pain is multi-causal and multidimensional, and a holistic, interdisciplinary approach to assessment is necessary, encompassing physical, psychological, social, and spiritual aspects of pain (together are ‘total pain’). A narrative approach to pain assessment is helpful, keeping the focus on the patient and their experience. Pain assessment tools can also be used to identify where pain is and how much it hurts. These include: pain body map, visual analogue scales (VAS), verbal rating scales (VRS), numerical rating scales (NRS), and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Classifications of pain include acute and chronic pain, nociceptive pain caused by the stimulation of nerve endings, and neuropathic pain caused by nerve dysfunction or compression. Analgesic drugs may be given according to the World Health Organization's pain relief ladder: step 1, non-opioid analgesics such as paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; step 2, mild opioids like codeine with or without non-opioid analgesics; and step 3, strong opioids like morphine with or without non-opioid analgesics. Non-pharmacological interventions for pain management include transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), massage, distraction, relaxation, breathing exercises, comfort measures, and presence of the nurse. Effective communication at all stages of management is essential.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Brief Pain Inventory"

1

Reid, Wendy Darlene, Yi-Wen Chen, Bahareh HajGhanbari, and Harvey Coxson. "Validation of the brief pain inventory in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease." In ERS International Congress 2016 abstracts. European Respiratory Society, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.pa3735.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Listik, Clarice, Eduardo Listik, Jorge Dornellys Lapa, Graziele Costa Santos, Fabricio Vianna do Vale, Rubens Gisbert Cury, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, et al. "Classifying pain in dystonia: a way to improve pain outcome measure in dystonia." In XIII Congresso Paulista de Neurologia. Zeppelini Editorial e Comunicação, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5327/1516-3180.250.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: Pain is a frequent and incapacitating non-motor symptom in dystonia. Evidence indicates that pain in dystonia is not only of muscular origin, but pain’s descending modulatory systems are impaired in dystonia. There is much to be learned about this topic. Still, we do not have a simple and straightforward way to classify, evaluate pain, and assess its improvement after pharmacological, surgical, and non-invasive treatments. Objective: To improve the classification system for pain in dystonia. Design and setting: This are the preliminary results of a multicentric study that at this moment selects patients in the Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo and in the Hospital Sao Paulo da Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Methods: We evaluated 36 patients with hereditary/idiopathic dystonia of any distribution. These results are preliminary finds of this multicentric assessment. We applied the Burke-Fahn-Marsden (BFM) dystonia scale, two pain scales (Douleur Neuropathique - DN4 and the short-form Brief Pain Inventory - BPI), and our developed classification system. Results: Patients (54.9 ± 14.6 years, 41.7% male) had a BFM motor and disability subscores of 17.6 ± 6.8 and 4.5 ± 5.7, respectively, and 15 patients (41.7%) had chronic pain. Four patients had chronic pain non-related to dystonia, and 11 patients had chronic pain directly related to dystonia. Six patients had a second chronic pain, one of which was aggravated by dystonia, and five were directly associated with dystonia. DN4 was 2.1 ± 1.9, and BPI pain severity 5.2 ± 2.0 interference 5.0 ± 3.2. Conclusions: Chronic pain is prevalent in dystonic patients and is frequently directly related to dystonia.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Listik, Clarice, Rubens Gisbert Cury, Sara Carvalho Barbosa Casagrande, Eduardo Listik, Debora Arnaut, Natally Santiago, Júlia Machado, et al. "Improvement of non-motor symptoms and quality of life after DBS stimulation for dystonia: one-year follow-up." In XIII Congresso Paulista de Neurologia. Zeppelini Editorial e Comunicação, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5327/1516-3180.253.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: DBS is an established treatment option in refractory dystonia, and motor outcomes have been extensively evaluated instead of the usually neglected NMS (e.g., pain). Objective: To describe the non-motor symptoms (NMS) after Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) surgery for refractory generalized inherited/idiopathic dystonia in a prospective study. Design and setting: A prospective study that evaluated patients in the Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo. Methods: This study evaluated patients before and one year after DBS surgery. We applied the following scales: Burke-Fahn-Marsden Rating Scale (BFMRS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Non-Motor Symptoms Scale for Parkinson’s Disease (NMSS-PD), Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-8 (PDQ8) Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) and McGill pain questionnaire. Results: 11 patients (38.35 ± 11.30 years) underwent surgery (36.3% women). Motor BFMRS subscore was 64.36 ± 22.94 at baseline and 33.55 ± 17.44 after surgery (p=0.003, 47.9% improvement on motor symptoms). HADS scores remained unchanged. NMSS-PD had a significant change after DBS, from 70.91 ± 59.07 to 37.18 ± 55.05 (p=0.013, 47,5% improvement). Seven patients reported pain before DBS surgery, and after one year, four patients reported chronic pain (i.e., pain improved by 42.28%). BPI’s severity and interference scores were 4.61 ± 2.84 and 4.12 ± 2.67, respectively before surgery, and 2.79 ± 2.31 (0.00–6.25) and 1.12 ± 1.32 (0.00–3.00) after DBS (p=0.043 and p=0.028). NPSI total score was 15.29 ± 13.94 before DBS, and reduced to 2.29 ± 2.98 afterward (p=0.028). McGill’s total score was 9.00 ± 3.32 before DBS, achieving 2.71 ± 2.93 after surgery (p=0.028), mostly driven by the sensory sub-score. Conclusions: We found that DBS improves NMS in dystonia, including chronic pain, anxiety, gastrointestinal symptoms, besides the already established improvement in QoL and motor symptoms.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

MacDermid, Joy, Samuel Jumbo, Michael Kalu, Tara Packham, George Athwal, and Ken Faber. "AB1328 MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES OF THE BRIEF PAIN INVENTORY-SHORT FORM (BPI-SF) AND THE REVISED SHORT-FORM MCGILL PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE-VERSION-2 (SF-MPQ-2) IN PAIN-RELATED MUSCULOSKELETAL CONDITIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW." In Annual European Congress of Rheumatology, EULAR 2019, Madrid, 12–15 June 2019. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-eular.3525.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Brief Pain Inventory' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography