Academic literature on the topic 'Budget‘s judicial review'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Budget‘s judicial review.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Budget‘s judicial review"
Omara, Andy. "The Constitutionalization of Budget for Education and Its Judicial Enforcement in Indonesia." Constitutional Review 2, no. 2 (2017): 189. http://dx.doi.org/10.31078/consrev222.
Full textDionisopoulos, P. Allan. "The Use of Judicial Review, 1940's to 1980's." Legal Reference Services Quarterly 5, no. 1 (1985): 105–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j113v05n01_06.
Full textÁvila, Ana Paula Oliveira;, and Daniella Bitencourt. "A JURISPRUDÊNCIA DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL SOBRE O CONTROLE JUDICIAL DO ORÇAMENTO PÚBLICO E A PROTEÇÃO DOS DIREITOS HUMANOS." Revista Brasileira de Filosofia do Direito 3, no. 1 (2017): 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/indexlawjournals/2526-012x/2017.v3i1.1899.
Full textRistawati, Rosa, and Radian Salman. "Judicial Independence vis-à-vis Judicial Populism: the Case of Ulayat Rights and Educational Rights." Constitutional Review 6, no. 1 (2020): 110. http://dx.doi.org/10.31078/consrev614.
Full textVovkivskaya, L. V., and E. V. Savostina. "Analytical review of judicial cases considered with the participation of an antimonopoly body." Russian competition law and economy, no. 1 (March 30, 2020): 92–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.32686/2542-0259-2020-1-92-95.
Full textCreyke, Robin. "Judicial Review and Merits Review: Are the Boundaries Being Eroded?" Federal Law Review 45, no. 4 (2017): 627–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.22145/flr.45.4.7.
Full textBaer, Susanne. "Who cares? A defence of judicial review." Journal of the British Academy 8 (2020): 75–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.5871/jba/008.075.
Full textDvoryanchikov, N. V. "Book review prof. F. S. Safuanov "Forensic psychological examination"." Psychology and Law 5, no. 3 (2015): 106–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2015050310.
Full textSusanto, Mei. "Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Negative Budgeter dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara." Jurnal Konstitusi 14, no. 4 (2018): 728. http://dx.doi.org/10.31078/jk1442.
Full textSukmariningsih, Retno Mawarini. "EXAMINING CONSTITUTIONAL AWARENESS AND STRENGTHENING JUDICIAL INTEGRITY." Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 7, no. 3 (2018): 443. http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v7i3.24722.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Budget‘s judicial review"
Stein, Karin. "The "Faint Hope Clause" (C.C.C. s.745.6): The judicial review process with special reference to the 1996 amendments." Thesis, University of Ottawa (Canada), 2001. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/6115.
Full textChristopoulos, Basile Georges Campos. "Controle de constitucionalidade de normas orçamentárias: o uso de argumentos consequencialistas nas decisões do Supremo Tribunal Federal." Universidade de São Paulo, 2014. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2133/tde-11022015-103805/.
Full textSantos, Ricardo Simões Xavier dos. "A análise constitucional da desvinculação de receitas da União (DRU) face aos direitos fundamentais sociais." Universidade Catolica de Salvador, 2015. http://ri.ucsal.br:8080/jspui/handle/123456730/183.
Full textMello, Cristiana De Santis Mendes de Farias. "O revigoramento do poder legislativo: uma agenda para o século XXI." Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2011. http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=4883.
Full textMarques, Antônio Silveira. "Jurisdição constitucional e soberania do povo." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2009. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/8739.
Full textBachert, Audrey. "L'équilibre des pouvoirs législatif et juridictionnel à l'épreuve des systèmes de protection des droits et libertés : étude comparée : États-Unis, Canada, Royaume-Uni." Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017AIXM0155.
Full textSenate, University of Arizona Faculty. "Faculty Senate Minutes May 1, 2017." University of Arizona Faculty Senate (Tucson, AZ), 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/625406.
Full textBartoš, Vojtěch. "Vymáhání soutěžního práva EU Evropskou Komisí a jeho soulad s právem na spravedlivý proces." Master's thesis, 2017. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-354639.
Full textSalter, Shannon. "Rights Without Remedies: The Court Party Theory and the Demise of the Court Challenges Program." Thesis, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/29612.
Full textBooks on the topic "Budget‘s judicial review"
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Judicial review legislation: Hearing before the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, second session, on S. 11, the proposed Veterans' Administration Adjudication Procedure and Judicial Review Act, and S. 2292, Veterans' Judicial Review Act, April 28, 1988. U.S. G.P.O., 1989.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Selection of court for multiple appeals: Report (to accompany H.R. 1162) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). U.S. G.P.O., 1987.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. The Comprehensive Regulatory Reform Act of 1995--S. 343: Report together with additional and supplemental views (to accompany S. 343). U.S. G.P.O., 1995.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Continued participation of senior judges in an in banc proceedings: Report (to accompany S. 531) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). U.S. G.P.O., 1996.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Continued participation of senior judges in an in banc proceedings: Report (to accompany S. 531) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). U.S. G.P.O., 1996.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Continued participation of senior judges in an in banc proceedings: Report (to accompany S. 531) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). U.S. G.P.O., 1996.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Federal Agency Compliance Act: Report together with dissenting views (to accompany H.R. 1544) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). U.S. G.P.O., 1997.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Veterans' Judicial Review Act: Report (to accompany H.R. 5288) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). U.S. G.P.O., 1988.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Veterans' Judicial Review Act: Report (to accompany H.R. 5288) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). U.S. G.P.O., 1988.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. House. Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Veterans' Judicial Review Act: Report (to accompany H.R. 5288) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). U.S. G.P.O., 1988.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Budget‘s judicial review"
Yüksel, Nahit. "Judicial Review of Budget in Turkish Law." In Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application. Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1914-7_9.
Full text"64.1 SCA s.31." In Judicial Review Handbook. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781509943517.0007.
Full textBowes, Ashley. "Appeals; Statutory Review; Judicial Review; The Ombudsman." In A Practical Approach to Planning Law. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/9780198833253.003.0018.
Full textCalabresi, Steven Gow. "The Republic of South Africa." In The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 1. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0010.
Full textCalabresi, Steven Gow. "The United States: Creation, Reconstruction, the Progressives, and the Modern Era." In The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 1. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0005.
Full textLoveland, Ian. "21. Human Rights V: The Impact of the Human Rights Act 1998." In Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198804680.003.0021.
Full textLoveland, Ian. "20. Human Rights IV: The Impact of the Human Rights Act 1998." In Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198860129.003.0020.
Full textKaboğlu, İbrahim Özden, and Stylianos-Ioannis G. Koutnatzis. "The Reception Process in Greece and Turkey." In A Europe of Rights. Oxford University Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535262.003.0008.
Full text"4.3.3 Summary of the issue in the application for judicial review The applicants alleged that the British Government, by stipulating that 75% of the shareholders and directors had to be of British nationality, were unnecessarily acting out of all proportion to the problem. Furthermore, the British Government had infringed their Community obligations by passing a statute that contained provisions in direct contravention of the Treaty of Rome 1957—notably that Member States cannot discriminate against each other (see Articles 7, 52 and 221 of the Treaty of Rome). 9.4.3.4 Summary of procedural history Factortame applied to the High Court for an order that the contravening sections of the Merchant Shipping Act 1988, together with parts of the accompanying regulations passed to implement the statute, should be disapplied pending a full hearing of the matter. The High Court considered that the dispute raised a question requiring the interpretation of some of the articles in the EC Treaty and decided to operate their discretion to ask the European Court for a preliminary ruling under Article 177 to the question whether s 14 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1988 infringed Articles 7, 52 and 221 of the EEC Treaty. This case commenced in December 1988 but the court decided to seek a preliminary ruling from the European Court and this was sent on 10 March 1989. The High Court ordered the application of the statute to be suspended on the grounds: • of changes brought about by entry into the EC and the UK obligations under the Treaty of Rome; • of s2(1) and (4) of the ECA 1972; • that the applicants stood a good chance of winning the case and, if they had to await a ruling, the case could take two years. However, if they were unable to register and therefore unable to fish for two years they would be bankrupt; • that this case for judicial review was not a case in which damages was a remedy on offer. The government appealed against the High Court decision on the grounds that an English court cannot suspend an Act of the English Parliament before it has even been determined to be in conflict with European law. The Court of Appeal agreed with the government. Factortame was forced to appeal to the House of Lords who said that, as far as the law as they saw it was concerned, the High Court could not suspend a statute. However, as the final court of appeal, they were obliged to seek a preliminary ruling on the matter from the ECJ under Article 177 (now Article 234), of the Treaty of Rome 1957 concerning whether a ‘national court had to give relief pending a reference in a main action and, if it gave relief, did Community law give it the power to grant interim protection’? (See Chapter 5.) The ECJ replied in the affirmative that a national court had to give relief. Furthermore, the ECJ stated that if a national law stood in the way of interim relief,." In Legal Method and Reasoning. Routledge-Cavendish, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843145103-231.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Budget‘s judicial review"
Lousada, Sergio, Rafael Camacho, and Joao Gouveia. "Execution of an artificial beach and respective complementary infrastructures (Madeira Island - Machico)." In I South Florida Congress of Development. CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS I South Florida Congress of Development - 2021, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.47172/sfcdv2021-0066.
Full textShafer, Michael W., and Eric Morgan. "Energy Harvesting for Marine-Wildlife Monitoring." In ASME 2014 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/smasis2014-7630.
Full text