Relevant bibliographies by topics / Cabbage – Insects

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Cabbage – Insects'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 7 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Cabbage – Insects.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Cabbage – Insects"

1

Bender, David A., and William P. Morrison. "634A PB 527 INSECT PEST MANAGEMENT THROUGH A CABBAGE-INDIAN MUSTARD COMPANION PLANTING." HortScience 29, no. 5 (May 1994): 523d—523. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.29.5.523d.

Full text
Abstract:
Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) has been reported to be a preferred host for diamondhack moth (Plutella xylostellu) and other insect pests when interplanted with cabbage (Brasssica oleracea var. capitata). A cabbage-Indian mustard companion planting study was conducted to determine the seasonal occurrence of cabbage insects and the potential for using a trap-crop system to reduce insecticide applications to cabbage in West Texas. Three-row plots of cabbage 9 m long were transplanted with and without sequentially seeded borders of Indian mustard in three seasons. Harmful and beneficial insects were counted at roughly weekly intervals. Insecticides were applied when insect populations in individual plots reached predetermined thresholds. Indian mustard did not appear to be more attractive than cabbage to lepidopterous pests, but did preferentially attract hemipterans, particularly harlequin bugs (Margantia histrionica). The mustard trap crop eliminated two insecticide` applications in one trial by reducing harlequin bug pressure on the cabbage.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Tolman, J. H., D. G. R. McLeod, and C. R. Harris. "Cost of crop losses in processing tomato and cabbage in southwestern Ontario due to insects, weeds and/or diseases." Canadian Journal of Plant Science 84, no. 3 (July 1, 2004): 915–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/p03-002.

Full text
Abstract:
The relative importance of insects, weeds and diseases to yield losses in processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) and cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata L.) was measured by comparing yields in the presence and absence of appropriate control programs. In the absence of any pest control, average crop losses exceeded 80% in both crops. Average yield losses due to weeds alone approached 80% in processing tomato and 60% in cabbage. Insects alone did not significantly reduce yield of processing tomato in either year. In the absence of insect control, significant yield loss in cabbage approached 50% in only one year. When diseases were not controlled, yield of processing tomato declined significantly by nearly 30% in one trial. Failure to control disease had no significant impact on cabbage yield in this study. Monetary losses and costs of each management program were calculated. Key words: Tomato, cabbage, yield loss, insects, weeds, diseases
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Mpumi, Nelson, Revocatus S. Machunda, Kelvin M. Mtei, and Patrick A. Ndakidemi. "Selected Insect Pests of Economic Importance to Brassica oleracea, Their Control Strategies and the Potential Threat to Environmental Pollution in Africa." Sustainability 12, no. 9 (May 8, 2020): 3824. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12093824.

Full text
Abstract:
The most common destructive insect pests affecting cabbages in African smallholder farmers include Plutella xylostella, Helula undalis, Pieris brassicae, Brevycoryne brassicae, Trichoplusia ni and Myzus persicae. Those insect pests infest cabbages at different stages of growth, causing huge damage and resulting into huge yield losses. The African smallholder farmers use cultural and synthetic pesticides to control insect pests and minimize infestations. The cultural practices like crop rotation, weeding and handpicking are used to minimize the invasion of cabbage pests. However, those practices are not sufficiently enough to control cabbage insect pests although they are cheap and safe to the environment. Also, the African smallholder famers rely intensively on the application of broad-spectrum of synthetic pesticides to effectively control the cabbage pests in the field. Due to severe infestation of cabbages caused by those insects, most of African smallholder farmers decide to; first, increase the concentrations of synthetic pesticides beyond the recommended amount by manufacturers. Secondly, increase the rate of application of the synthetic pesticides throughout the growing season to effectively kill the most stubborn insect pests infesting cabbages (Brassica oleracea var. capitata). Thirdly, they mix more than two synthetic pesticides for the purpose of increasing the spectrum of killing the most stubborn insect pests in the field. All those scenarios intensify the environmental pollution especially soil and water pollution. Moreover, most of insecticides sprayed are made with broad-spectrum and are hazardous chemicals posing environmental pollution and threats to natural enemies’ ecosystems. Therefore, this paper reviews Brassica oleracea var. capitata insect pests and control measures as a potential environmental pollution threat in African smallholder farmers.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Bender, David A., William P. Morrison, and Raymond E. Frisbie. "Intercropping Cabbage and Indian Mustard for Potential Control of Lepidopterous and Other Insects." HortScience 34, no. 2 (April 1999): 275–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.34.2.275.

Full text
Abstract:
A system of intercropping cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) with Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.] to reduce pesticide applications was evaluated over three cropping seasons. Insects were monitored in nonintercropped cabbage, cabbage plots surrounded by Indian mustard, and the Indian mustard intercrop. Insecticide applications were made to individual plots based on specific treatment thresholds for lepidopterous insects and accepted pest management practices for other insects. Intercropping had no significant effect on the number of lepidopterous larvae in cabbage. Indian mustard did not appear to preferentially attract lepidopterous insects, but was highly attractive to hemipterans, especially harlequin bugs [Murgantia histrionica (Hahn)]. In one season with heavy harlequin bug pressure, intercropping with Indian mustard eliminated two insecticide applications to cabbage. Intercropping cabbage with Indian mustard does not appear to be an economical pest management practice under normal pest pressures in West Texas.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Cranshaw, Whitney, D. Casey Sclar, Mohammad Al-Doghairi, Dan Gerace, and Andrea Tupy. "Control of Cabbage Insects, 1996." Arthropod Management Tests 22, no. 1 (January 1, 1997): 93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/22.1.93.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Goodman, R., G. Hepworth, P. Kaczynski, B. McKee, S. Clarke, and C. Bluett. "Honeybee pollination of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) cv. Manor." Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, no. 8 (2001): 1217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ea99008.

Full text
Abstract:
The role of honeybees (Apis mellifera) in the pollination of buckwheat cv. Manor was studied in a commercial planting at Smeaton, Victoria. Honeybees comprised 80% of all insect visitors to this crop. Other insects included ladybirds (Coccinella transversalis and C. undecimpunctata), hoverflies (Meangyna viridiceps), drone flies (Eristalis sp.), blowflies (Calliphoridae), cabbage white butterflies (Pieris rapae), small bush flies and native bees. The activity of honeybees and other insects increased seed production from 91.5 g/plot (plots closed to insects) to 180.4 g/plot (plots open to insects).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Sigareva, D., and V. Kharchenko. "Reproduction of entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernema feltiae) on different insect hosts under laboratory conditions." Interdepartmental Thematic Scientific Collection of Plant Protection and Quarantine, no. 65 (December 20, 2019): 161–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.36495/1606-9773.2019.65.161-174.

Full text
Abstract:
Goal. To identify the effectiveness of entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernema feltiae isolate with a biological product «Entonem» ™ Copert) on the larvae and adults of different insect pests at various ways of their infection, and to explore the possibility of generating a significant amount of the invasive larvae of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN). Research methods. The material for our study is the 7 types of test insects: larvae of the large and the small wax moth, castaneum flour, gyroscope, common cabbage butterfly, Kovalik pilosula, as well as the may beetle, which was used stage larvae, as well as individuals of adult beetles (imago). All the studied insects infected with EPN (pathogen — Steinernema feltiae with biopreparation «Entonem» (™Koppert)) in the laboratory on filter paper or in sterile soil. Recorded date of infection and death of insects and counted the number of allocated of each type of insect infective larvae of nematodes. Estimated duration of migration and reproductive potential of different test insects. Results. The use of different methods of infection (dry contact parasite and insect hosts on filter paper or by making a dose in sterile soil, which was placed insect-host) at a dose of 50 larvae per one insect, showed that in half of the cases a significant difference between them is not detected. However, castaneum flour, Kovalik pilosula and ordinary spinning top, the best was the method of contamination in the Petri dishes, and adults of the may beetle — in groundwater samples. The duration of the process of migration of larvae of the entomopathogenic nematodes from the cadavers of insect hosts ranged from 27—51 day and were more dependent on the insect host than from its method of infection. A short period of migration of the larvae of large and small wax moth (27—36 days), long (35—45) from larvae of a top common and castaneum flour, the longest period of time (48—51 hours) — larvae of cabbage butterflies and a beetle may. Performance in relation to the amount of the newly formed infective larvae determines the insect host. Among the investigated 7-insects-the home of highest performance was observed in the may beetle (115980—120060 larvae) and the cabbage (93440—97880 larvae). Less productive was the great wax moth, the flour castaneum and the grasshopper pelousy (respectively 26880 ± 420; 34500 ± 430; 32400 ± 673).Less productive are the common top, the May beetle (imago) and the small wax moth, in which from 15640 to 26880 invasive larvae were formed. Findings. In laboratory conditions, without significant material costs, you can get a sufficient number of entomopathogenic nematodes. The method of directly introducing entomopathogenic nematodes onto test insects in Petri dishes proved to be the best compared to soil invasion. The duration and volume of migration of larvae of entomopathogenic nematodes is determined mainly by the species of host insects. The shortest migration period was recorded in wax moth larvae (small and large), significantly longer (almost 1.5 times) in the larvae of May beetle and cabbage. The most productive in relation to juvenile larvae of EPN were the cabbage and the larvae of the May beetle, and the least productive ones were the common top, May beetle (imago) and small wax moth.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Buhler, W. G., and R. E. Foster. "Control of Insects on Cabbage, 1994." Arthropod Management Tests 20, no. 1 (January 1, 1995): 69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/20.1.69.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Transplants were planted 24 May at the O’Neall Memorial Farm, Lafayette, Indiana. Plots consisted of single rows, 30 ft long, 5 ft apart, and were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Insecticides were applied with a CO2-powered backpack sprayer using hollow cone nozzle tips delivering 19 gpa at 32 psi. Sprays were applied on 21 Jun, 11 and 20 Jul. Insects were counted on 5 whole plants in each plot. Results are presented as the average number of insects per 5 plants. Cabbages (20 per plot) were harvested and yield data recorded on 25 Jul.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Santos, N. A., N. C. Teixeira, J. O. S. Valim, E. F. A. Almeida, M. G. A. Oliveira, and W. G. Campos. "Sulfur fertilization increases defense metabolites and nitrogen but decreases plant resistance against a host-specific insect." Bulletin of Entomological Research 108, no. 4 (October 24, 2017): 479–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007485317001018.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractWe tested the sulfur-modulated plant resistance hypothesis using potted cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) plants that were grown without and with increasing levels of sulfur fertilization. Changes in plant chemical traits were assessed and developmental performance of Plutella xylostella, a highly host-specific leaf-chewing insect, was followed. Leaf sulfur concentration gradually increased with growing addition of sulfur in soil; however, there was a generalized saturation response curve, with a plateau phase, for improvements in total leaf nitrogen, defense glucosinolates and insect performance. Plutella xylostella performed better in sulfur-fertilized cabbage probably because of the higher level of nitrogen, despite of the higher content of glucosinolates, which are toxic for many non-specialized insects. Despite the importance of sulfur in plant nutrition and production, especially for Brassica crops, our results showed that sulfur fertilization could decrease plant resistance against insects with high feeding specialization.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Kovalikova, Zuzana, Jan Kubes, Milan Skalicky, Nikola Kuchtickova, Lucie Maskova, Jiri Tuma, Pavla Vachova, and Vaclav Hejnak. "Changes in Content of Polyphenols and Ascorbic Acid in Leaves of White Cabbage after Pest Infestation." Molecules 24, no. 14 (July 18, 2019): 2622. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24142622.

Full text
Abstract:
Crops, such as white cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata (L.) f. alba), are often infested by herbivorous insects that consume the leaves directly or lay eggs with subsequent injury by caterpillars. The plants can produce various defensive metabolites or free radicals that repel the insects to avert further damage. To study the production and effects of these compounds, large white cabbage butterflies, Pieris brassicae and flea beetles, Phyllotreta nemorum, were captured in a cabbage field and applied to plants cultivated in the lab. After insect infestation, leaves were collected and UV/Vis spectrophotometry and HPLC used to determine the content of stress molecules (superoxide), primary metabolites (amino acids), and secondary metabolites (phenolic acids and flavonoids). The highest level of superoxide was measured in plants exposed to fifty flea beetles. These plants also manifested a higher content of phenylalanine, a substrate for the synthesis of phenolic compounds, and in activation of total phenolics and flavonoid production. The levels of specific phenolic acids and flavonoids had higher variability when the dominant increase was in the flavonoid, quercetin. The leaves after flea beetle attack also showed an increase in ascorbic acid which is an important nutrient of cabbage.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Cabbage – Insects"

1

Umeda, K., and D. MacNeil. "Aphid Control in Cabbage Study." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/219994.

Full text
Abstract:
Aphistar provided the quickest reduction of the aphids after one application and continued residual control for up to 14 DAT-2. Following a second application and reduction of aphids, Pirimor, Provado, Fulfill, Actara, and Metasystox-R provided a varied degree of residual control of aphids between 5 and 14 DAT-2. A comparison of Fulfill rates indicated that the two rates were equally effective at 5 DAT-2 but the lower rate did not offer as long residual control compared to the higher rate. Endosulfan was moderately effective and did not provide acceptable control after 1 week.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Kerns, David L., and Tony Tellez. "Baseline Susceptibility of Cabbage Looper to Insecticides." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/220013.

Full text
Abstract:
Populations of cabbage looper were collected during 1998 from 12 geographical location in the United States, and were assessed for susceptibility to six new insecticides: Alert, Avaunt, Confirm, Intrepid, Proclaim, and Success, and to a standard insecticide, Pounce. There was no detectable evidence indicating insecticide resistance to any of the new insecticides. However, variability in response to Confirm, Proclaim, and Success warrants close resistance monitoring. Cabbage looper response to Pounce was extremely variable, and there was strong evidence for the occurrence of resistance. Populations from Jackson, MS, Sunderland, MA, and Whately, MA all exhibited high levels of resistance to Pounce with resistance ratios of 90.60, 93.50, and 76.30-fold respectively.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Umeda, K., G. Gal, and J. Murrieta. "Diamondback Moth Control in Spring Cabbage." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/221675.

Full text
Abstract:
In a small plot field study, diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella, DBM) in cabbage were not significantly reduced by various insecticide treatments when applied one time during the season. ABG -6406 (Abbott Laboratories), Success® (spinosad, DowElanco), and Kryocide® generally maintained larger -sized DBM larval numbers below or similar to the untreated check at most rating dates. Cabbage treated by Xentari®, Alert® (clorfenapyr, Cyanamid), Confirm® (tebufenozide, Rohm and Haas) and Proclaim® (emamectin benzoate, Novartis) exhibited numbers of larger -sized larvae that exceeded the untreated check at certain rating dates. DBM populations were not consistent during the testing period to allow assessment of treatment differences.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Umeda, K., J. Murrieta, and D. Stewart. "Lepidopterous Insect Pest Control with New Insecticides in Cabbage." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1997. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/221641.

Full text
Abstract:
Four experimental insecticides being developed for lepidopterous insect control in vegetable crops were applied on cabbage and demonstrated efficacy against cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni, CL). Chlorfenapyr (Alert®), tebufenozide (Confirm®), spinosad (Success®), and emamectin- benzoate (Proclaim®) reduced the number of larger cabbage loopers following multiple applications. The experimental insecticides were comparable or superior to the commercially available standard treatments of thiodicarb (Larvin®), methomyl (Lannate®), or cryolite (Kryocide®). Evaluations at 7 days after treatment (DAT) showed that Success controlled CL so that no medium to large -sized larvae were observed. Alert, Confirm, and Proclaim were highly effective and less than 0.3 CL/plant were detected. The untreated cabbage had 0.5 to 1.1 CL/plant that were medium to large-sized at various observation dates.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Umeda, K., D. MacNeil, and D. Roberts. "New Insecticides for Diamondback Moth Control in Cabbage." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/219999.

Full text
Abstract:
At 3 days after the first application, RH-2485, Success, Proclaim, Avaunt, and Larvin reduced the total number of diamondback moth (DBM) larvae to less than 2.0 larvae per 10 plants compared to the untreated that had 7.0 larvae/10 plants. Alert, Kryocide, and S-1812 treated cabbage exhibited 4.0 to 5.0 larvae/10 plants and Lannate was intermediate with 2.7 total larvae/10 plants. Following a second application, Success and Proclaim completely controlled DBM for one week. Success, Proclaim, Alert, and Larvin continued to offer very good control of DBM for two weeks after the second application. S-1812 performed similarly to Lannate.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Umeda, K., and C. Fredman. "Comparative Efficacy of B.t. Insecticides Against Lepidopterous Pests in Cabbage." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1995. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/221494.

Full text
Abstract:
Several commercial formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis (Al) insecticides were applied on cabbage and lepidopterous pests including Tricoplusia it (cabbage looper, CL), Spodoptera exigua (beet armyworm, BAW), and Plutella xvlostella (diamondback moth, DBM) were effectively reduced in population. The ten commercial products did not appear to vary significantly in controlling CL, the dominant species present in the cabbage.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Umeda, K., and J. Murrieta. "Proclaim® Insecticde Efficacy Against Cabbage Looper in Broccoli Experimental Use Permit Field Study." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1997. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/221639.

Full text
Abstract:
Proclaim® insecticide (emamectin benzoate, MK -244, Merck Research Laboratories) was applied two times during the broccoli growing season for lepidoperous insect control. The primary pest was cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni CL) and very few beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua). After the second application at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after treatment (WAT), Proclaim reduced the number of CL in the broccoli relative to the untreated check. The number of large larvae observed in the Proclaim treated broccoli was one-half of that found in the untreated broccoli. Proclaim efficacy to reduce CL was comparable to the standard treatment of Larvin® (thiodicarb) plus Asana® (esfenvalerate). At harvest, the Proclaim treated broccoli had 20% infested crowns compared to 28% for the standard treatment and 44% in the untreated.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kerns, David L., and Tony Tellez. "Efficacy of Pyrethroid Insecticides for Cabbage Looper Control in Head Lettuce, 1997." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/221662.

Full text
Abstract:
Mustang 1.5EW, Ammo 2.5EC, Pounce 3,2EC, Scout X-TRA, and three formulations of Karate were compared for efficacy to cabbage loopers infesting head lettuce in Yuma, AZ Karate and Pounce provided the most consistent cabbage looper control followed by Mustang and Scout X-TRA. Ammo appeared slightly inferior to the other pyrethroids tested. There did not appear to be any obvious differences in the efficacy of the three Karate formulations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Palumbo, John C. "Beet Armyworm and Cabbage Looper in Head Lettuce: Control with Selective and Reduced-Risk Insecticides." College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/214961.

Full text
Abstract:
Studies were replicated over 2 years to further evaluate the residual efficacy of several selective, reduced-risk compounds that are now registered for use in head lettuce. In most cases, the Success, Proclaim, Avaunt and Intrepid provided excellent seasonal efficacy against beet armyworm and cabbage looper larvae. Their performance at stand establishment and harvest were also examined. Based on the results of these studies and additional trials conducted over the past several years, we now have sufficient information for optimizing their uses in our lettuce pest management program. Because they are uniquely different insecticide chemistries, they can be rotated throughout the season to prevent the rapid buildup of resistance. A table was constructed that offers suggested uses for each compound throughout the season. The results are ultimately are aimed at assisting growers and PCA’s in making sound decisions on choosing compounds for use in controlling beet armyworm and cabbage looper in head lettuce.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Kerns, David L. "Efficacy of Biorational Insecticides to Beet Armyworm and Cabbage Looper on Iceberg Lettuce." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1995. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/221466.

Full text
Abstract:
Four tests were conducted evaluating biorational insecticides for control of beet armyworm (BAW) and cabbage looper (CL) on iceberg lettuce. Treatment means for BAW were difficult to separate due to low population densities. The new formulation of Javelin appeared to be the most efficacious Bt overall. However, when Bts were compared on a equal cost/A basis, there were no significant derences among products for CL control. All Bts were comparable to Lannate for CL control. The neem oil extract Align, provided adequate BAW and CL control, and its efficacy at low rates seemed to be slightly enhanced by the addition of Sunspray Ultrafine Oil. Larvin at lower than label recommended rates gave good BAW and CL control as did Javelin. The tank-mix of these two products did not enhance worm control over that of the products used alone. Mustang gave good control of CL but appeared to be slightly weak against BAW.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Cabbage – Insects"

1

Butterfield, Anne. The role of olfaction in the location of its host, the Cabbage Root Fly "Delia radicum" (L.) (Diptera:Anthomyiidae)by an insect parasitoid, "Trybliographa rapae" (Westw.) (Hymenoptera:Cynipidae). Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

(Illustrator), Miranda Gray, ed. Insects on Cabbages and Oilseed Rape (Naturalists' Handbook). Richmond Publishing Company, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kirk, William D. J. Insects on Cabbages and Oilseed Rape (Naturalists' Handbook). Richmond Publishing Company, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Langan, Anthony Mark. Interactions between insect pests and the size, quality and gas exchange activity of cabbage plants (Brassica oleracea). 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Cabbage – Insects"

1

Bai, Y. Y., H. Z. Mao, X. L. Cao, T. Tang, D. Wu, D. D. Chen, W. G. Li, and W. J. Fu. "Transgenic Cabbage Plants with Insect Tolerance." In Biotechnology in Agriculture, 156–59. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1779-1_20.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Haynes, Kenneth F. "Genetics of Pheromone Communication in the Cabbage Looper Moth, Trichoplusia ni." In Insect Pheromone Research, 525–34. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6371-6_45.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kjær-Pedersen, Christian. "Dispersive flight of the cabbage stem weevil." In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships, 109–11. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1654-1_32.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Roessingh, Peter, Erich Städler, Jakob Hurter, and Thomas Ramp. "Oviposition stimulant for the cabbage root fly: important new cabbage leaf surface compound and specific tarsal receptors." In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships, 141–42. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1654-1_45.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Gabryś, Beata, and Magdalena Pawluk. "Acceptability of different species of Brassicaceae as hosts for the cabbage aphid." In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships, 105–9. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1890-5_12.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Baur, Robert, Vladimír Koštál, and Erich Städler. "Root damage by conspecific larvae induces preference for oviposition in cabbage root flies." In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships, 224–27. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1720-0_51.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Blight, M. M., A. J. Hick, J. A. Pickett, L. E. Smart, L. J. Wadhams, and C. M. Woodcock. "Volatile plant metabolites involved in host-plant recognition by the cabbage seed weevil, Ceutorhynchus assimilis." In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships, 105–6. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1654-1_30.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

van Loon, Joop J. A., Chen Zhu Wang, Jens Kvist Nielsen, Rieta Gols, and Yu Tong Qiu. "Flavonoids from cabbage are feeding stimulants for diamondback moth larvae additional to glucosinolates: Chemoreception and behaviour." In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships, 27–34. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2776-1_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Rojas, Julio C., and Tristram D. Wyatt. "Role of visual cues and interaction with host odour during the host-finding behaviour of the cabbage moth." In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships, 59–65. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1890-5_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Bartlet, E., R. Mithen, and S. J. Clark. "Feeding of the cabbage stem flea beetle Psylliodes chrysocephala on high and low glucosinolate cultivars of oilseed rape." In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships, 87–89. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1720-0_20.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Cabbage – Insects"

1

Tuan, Pham Anh. "Elevated CO2condition reduces the cabbage foliage quality and allelochemicals that consequently affect the performance of the herbivorous insect Spodoptera litura (Fab.)." In 2016 International Congress of Entomology. Entomological Society of America, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/ice.2016.111739.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Cabbage – Insects' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography