To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Carl Schmitt.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic 'Carl Schmitt'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 dissertations / theses for your research on the topic 'Carl Schmitt.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse dissertations / theses on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Gross, Raphael. "Carl Schmitt und die Juden : eine deutsche Rechtslehre /." Frankfurt am Main : Suhrkamp, 2000. http://www.gbv.de/dms/sub-hamburg/310867010.pdf.
Full text
2
Waldstein, Thor von. "Der Beutewert des Staates : Carl Schmitt und der Pluralismus." Graz Ares-Verl, 2008. http://d-nb.info/98618747X/04.
Full text
3
Hofmann, Hasso. "Legitimität gegen Legalität : der Weg der politischen Philosophie Carl Schmitts /." Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2002. http://www.gbv.de/dms/sub-hamburg/349363234.pdf.
Full text
4
Motschenbacher, Alfons. "Katechon oder Großinquisitor? : eine Studie zu Inhalt und Struktur der politischen Theologie Carl Schmitts /." Marburg : Tectum-Verl, 2000. http://www.gbv.de/dms/sub-hamburg/314709150.pdf.
Full text
5
Stemeseder, Heinrich. "Der politische Mythus des Antichristen : eine prinzipielle Untersuchung zum Widerstandsrecht und Carl Schmitt /." Berlin : Duncker und Humblot, 1997. http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/recht/toc/279948727.pdf.
Full text
6
Dahlheimer, Manfred. "Carl Schmitt und der deutsche Katholizismus 1888 - 1936 /." Paderborn [u.a.] : Schöningh, 1998. http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/recht/toc/293035229.pdf.
Full text
7
Gómez, Orfanel Germán. "Excepción y normalidad en el pensamiento de Carl Schmitt /." Madrid : Centro de estudios constitucionales, 1986. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb374190999.
Full text
8
Waldstein, Thor von. "Der Beutewert des Staates Carl Schmitt und der Pluralismus." Graz Ares-Verl, 1989. http://deposit.d-nb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=3018661&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm.
Full text
9
Jouin, Céline. "Droit international, épistémologie et idéologie chez Carl Schmitt." Rennes 1, 2009. http://www.theses.fr/2009REN1PH01.
Full textAbstract:
Les textes de droit international de Carl Schmitt sont analysés d’un double point de vue : l’émergence du droit international en tant que discipline universitaire dans l’Allemagne de Weimar et le dégagement de l’épistémologie sous-jacente aux analyses juridiques de Schmitt. Le premier aspect permet de mettre en lumière les sources de l’idéologie d’une génération de juristes allemands nationalistes et souverainistes. Il conduit à relativiser la singularité des positions schmittiennes. Le rapport aux événement politiques, mais aussi aux disciplines consacrées que sont le droit public et l’histoire, éclaire l’ensemble des résistances que Schmitt oppose à la construction du droit international comme science neutre et objective. Le second aspect vise à arracher Schmitt à l’univers de l’irrationalisme romantique que certains considèrent comme le sien. L’analyse de l’écriture théorique de Schmitt, notamment dans son histoire du droit international (Le nomos de la terre), sert à mettre en évidence le matérialisme et le nominalisme du juriste, sous la façade spiritualisteThe texts of international law of Carl Schmitt are analysed from a double perspective: the emergence of international law as an universitary subject in Germany of the Weimar Republic and the reconstitution of the epistemology underlying the juridical analyses of Schmitt. The first aspect allows us to throw light on the sources of souverainism and nationalism of a whole generation of legal scientists. This leads to relativize the singularity of Schmitt’s position. The relation to political events but also to the established disciplines like constitutional law or history sheds light on the resistances that Schmitt opposes to the construction of international law as a neutral and objective science. The second aspect aims at separating Schmitt from the romantic irrationalism that characterized his thought in the eyes of many people. The analysis of his epistemology, particularly in his history of international law (Nomos of the Earth), reveals Schmitt’s materialism and nominalism behind the spiritualistic façade
10
Tönnies, Sibylle. "Ganz oder gar nicht! : Carl Schmitt und Afghanistan." Universität Potsdam, 2011. http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2013/6331/.
Full text
11
Bianchini, Fernando Novelli 1973. "A democracia parlamentar na crítica de Carl Schmitt." [s.n.], 2011. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/279311.
Full textAbstract:
Orientador: Roberto RomanoDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-19T07:16:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Bianchini_FernandoNovelli_M.pdf: 1389137 bytes, checksum: 00828ecf31df4523661005da345ea174 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011
Resumo: O presente trabalho objetiva analisar, por um lado, as críticas desenvolvidas pelo jurista e filósofo Carl Schmitt à democracia parlamentar representativa, expostas em suas obras publicadas no período compreendido entre as duas guerras mundiais, bem como tenciona elucidar a proposição, pelo autor, de resposta ao problema político e jurídico que é levantado, mediante a construção de um Estado totalitário. Debate o retorno de tais críticas no atual contexto brasileiro e global e introduz os princípios e os instrumentos da democracia participativa, por outro lado, como possível solução para a problemática que hoje é reavivada, sem sugerir, entretanto, a obliteração da democracia representativa. Analisa os fundamentos e mecanismos da democracia participativa, baseada historicamente na liberdade comunal, invocando as lições do jurista e filósofo Alexis de Tocqueville, especialmente quanto à distribuição de poder político. Debate a justiça coletiva e a importância para o pacto federativo nesse contexto, finalizando, assim, a dissertação
Abstract: The following work intends to analyze, in one hand, the criticisms developed by the jurist and philosopher Carl Schmitt to the parliamentary representative democracy, exposed in his works published in the period between the two world wars, and aims to clarify the proposal, made by the author, in response to the political and legal problem that is exposed, by building a totalitarian state. Discusses the return of such criticism in the current brazilian and global contexts and introduces the principles and instruments of the participatory democracy, on the other hand, as a possible solution to the problem which is now revived, without suggesting, however, the obliteration of representative democracy. After that, analyses the foundations and mechanisms of participatory democracy, historically based on communal freedom, invoking the lessons of the jurist and philosopher Alexis de Tocqueville, especially concerning to the distribution of political power. Debate the importance of the collective justice and the federative pact in this context, ending, after that, the dissertation
Mestrado
Filosofia
Mestre em Filosofia
12
Hernando, Nieto Eduardo. "Carl Schmitt y los desafíos al Estado constitucional." Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 1996. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/97297.
Full text
13
Durden, William. "From public/private spheres to tout autre est tout autre: christianity and politics in Carl Schmitt's The concept of the political and Jacques Derrida's The gift of death /." Online version, 2008. http://content.wwu.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/theses&CISOPTR=289&CISOBOX=1&REC=4.
Full text
14
Heimes, Claus. "Politik und Transzendenz Ordnungsdenken bei Carl Schmitt und Eric Voegelin." Berlin Duncker & Humblot, 2007. http://d-nb.info/995538468/04.
Full text
15
Casanova, Arturo. "Legale und/oder legitime Diktatur ? : die Rezeption von Carl Schmitt und Hans Kelsen in der schweizerischen Staatsnotrechtslehre zur Zeit des Zweiten Weltkrieges /." Basel ; Genf [etc.] : Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 2006. http://aleph.unisg.ch/hsgscan/hm00153470.pdf.
Full text
16
Simon, Rupert. "Die Begriffe des Politischen bei Carl Schmitt und Jacques Derrida." Frankfurt, M. Berlin Bern Bruxelles New York, NY Oxford Wien Lang, 2006. http://d-nb.info/985978619/04.
Full text
17
Dutton, Brett A. R. "Leo Strauss's recovery of the political the city and man as a reply to Carl Schmitt's The concept of the political /." Connect to full text, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/631.
Full textAbstract:
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Sydney, 2003.Title from title screen (viewed 16 April 2008). Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the Discipline of Government and International Relations, School of Economics and Political Science, Faculty of Economics and Business. Degree awarded 2003; thesis submitted 2002. Includes bibliographical references. Also available in print form.
18
Sinaeian, Masoud. "Du politique au rapport théologico-politique chez Carl Schmitt." Thesis, Paris 1, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020PA01H211.
Full textAbstract:
La présente recherche vise à reconstruire les contours du concept de politique de Carl Schmitt, et ses idées théologico-politiques. Elle porte aussi sur ce que ces interventions théologico-politiques peuvent impliquer concernant sa conception du politique, et la structure de ce qui appartient à la politique dans l’histoire moderne. Tout d’abord, nous présentons les différentes dimensions du concept de politique dans le cadre d'une histoire de la théorie juridique allemande de l'État. Le concept de politique se forme avant tout dans ce contexte et trouve là ses principales distinctions. Puis nous analysons le concept du politique pour reconstruire sa logique interne et ses fonctions. Nous soutenons que cette logique a un double aspect, car elle est basée sur des dichotomies telles que prince-peuple, État-société, représentation-identité, etc. Ensuite, nous examinons certaines limites des idées de Schmitt dans le cadre de ses réflexions sur les grandes questions de nature théologico-politique ainsi qu’à propos de certains auteurs sélectionnés en fonction de ce contexte. Enfin, nous analysons l’approche métaphorique schmittienne de la question théologico-politique ainsi que l’idée d’un rapport analogique structurelle entre pensée théologique et pensée juridico-politique. Nous abordons également la relation potentielle de ces interventions théologico-politiques dans sa conception du politiqueThe present research aims to reconstruct the contours of Carl Schmitt's concept of the political and theological-political ideas. It also examines what these theological-political interventions may imply about his conception of the political, and the structure of the question of what belongs to politics in modern history. First, we present the different dimensions of the concept of the political within the framework of a history of German legal theory of the state. The concept of the political is formed above all in this context and finds its main distinctions here. We then analyze the concept of the political in order to reconstruct its internal logic and functions. We argue that this logic has a double aspect, based on dichotomies such as prince-people, state-society, representation-identity, and so on. Second, we examine some of the limitations of Schmitt's ideas in the context of his reflections on major questions of a theological-political nature as well as on some authors selected in that context. Finally, we analyze Schmitt's metaphorical approach to the theological-political question as well as the idea of an analogical structural relation between theological and juridico-political thought. We also deal with the potential relationship of these theological-political interventions in his conception of the political
19
Schmitt, Carl [Verfasser]. "Über Schuld und Schuldarten. : Eine terminologische Untersuchung. / Carl Schmitt." Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2017. http://d-nb.info/1238440916/34.
Full text
20
Mossa, Andrea. "Il nemico ritrovato. Carl Schmitt e gli Stati Uniti." Doctoral thesis, Università degli studi di Trento, 2015. https://hdl.handle.net/11572/368210.
Full textAbstract:
La tesi affronta il tema del rapporto tra Carl Schmitt e gli Stati Uniti. Il primo capitolo, dedicato all'America vista da Schmitt, ripercorre i riferimenti presenti nell'opera dell'autore – dall'interpretazione della tradizione politico-giuridica americana in opposizione a quella continentale, al ruolo determinante che ha il Nuovo Mondo nello sviluppo e nella decadenza dell'ordinamento internazionale moderno, fino alle suggestioni teologico-politiche legate alla figura del katéchon – giungendo alla conclusione che non si possa liquidare l'atteggiamento di Schmitt come una pura e semplice ostilità assoluta nei confronti dell'America e di ciò che rappresenta. Per rendere conto di questo rapporto in tutta la sua complessità , occorre tenere presente la costitutiva ambivalenza dell'ultimo concetto schmittiano di inimicizia, e il suo implicare la dimensione del riconoscimento.
Il secondo capitolo tratta del rapporto fra Schmitt e il nutrito gruppo dei suoi ex-allievi ed ex-amici che lasciarono la Germania per gli Stati Uniti a partire dagli anni Trenta. Al di là delle curiosità storico-biografiche, la ricostruzione di queste relazioni scientifiche e professionali e del loro retaggio è determinante per comprendere la (mancata) ricezione dell'opera di Schmitt nel secondo dopoguerra, e permette di fare un bilancio critico dell'ipotesi che egli abbia esercitato un'influenza “sotterranea†sul conservatorismo americano (ipotesi che nella tesi viene decisamente respinta per carenza di basi filologiche). Il terzo capitolo indaga la ricezione del pensiero schmittiano da parte di Hannah Arendt, prendendo spunto dalle moltissime annotazioni manoscritte lasciate da quest'ultima in margine alla sua copia del Nomos della terra. Insieme ai diari degli anni Cinquanta, questi appunti sono la traccia di un confronto molto significativo, che coincide (cronologicamente e concettualmente) con l'elaborazione della teoria dell'agire politico che troverà espressione nelle opere successive (Vita activa, Sulla rivoluzione, e l'incompiuta Introduzione alla politica): sebbene in questi scritti non sia mai citato il nome di Schmitt, la sua presenza come interlocutore implicito è pressoché costante, e testimoniata da un gran numero di indizi testuali. Nel quarto capitolo, infine, con una rassegna della bibliografia in lingua inglese degli ultimi trent'anni, si ricostruisce il crescente interesse per l'opera di Schmitt con particolare attenzione per due casi: quello della rivista «Telos», che ne ha rielaborato il pensiero integrandolo (non senza forzature) in una prospettiva di radicalismo democratico, e quello della leggenda storiografica che ha fatto di Schmitt una sorta di ispiratore occulto del neoconservatorismo americano e dell'amministrazione Bush junior.
21
Mossa, Andrea. "Il nemico ritrovato. Carl Schmitt e gli Stati Uniti." Doctoral thesis, University of Trento, 2015. http://eprints-phd.biblio.unitn.it/1436/1/tesicompleta.pdf.
Full textAbstract:
La tesi affronta il tema del rapporto tra Carl Schmitt e gli Stati Uniti. Il primo capitolo, dedicato all'America vista da Schmitt, ripercorre i riferimenti presenti nell'opera dell'autore – dall'interpretazione della tradizione politico-giuridica americana in opposizione a quella continentale, al ruolo determinante che ha il Nuovo Mondo nello sviluppo e nella decadenza dell'ordinamento internazionale moderno, fino alle suggestioni teologico-politiche legate alla figura del katéchon – giungendo alla conclusione che non si possa liquidare l'atteggiamento di Schmitt come una pura e semplice ostilità assoluta nei confronti dell'America e di ciò che rappresenta. Per rendere conto di questo rapporto in tutta la sua complessità, occorre tenere presente la costitutiva ambivalenza dell'ultimo concetto schmittiano di inimicizia, e il suo implicare la dimensione del riconoscimento.
Il secondo capitolo tratta del rapporto fra Schmitt e il nutrito gruppo dei suoi ex-allievi ed ex-amici che lasciarono la Germania per gli Stati Uniti a partire dagli anni Trenta. Al di là delle curiosità storico-biografiche, la ricostruzione di queste relazioni scientifiche e professionali e del loro retaggio è determinante per comprendere la (mancata) ricezione dell'opera di Schmitt nel secondo dopoguerra, e permette di fare un bilancio critico dell'ipotesi che egli abbia esercitato un'influenza “sotterranea” sul conservatorismo americano (ipotesi che nella tesi viene decisamente respinta per carenza di basi filologiche). Il terzo capitolo indaga la ricezione del pensiero schmittiano da parte di Hannah Arendt, prendendo spunto dalle moltissime annotazioni manoscritte lasciate da quest'ultima in margine alla sua copia del Nomos della terra. Insieme ai diari degli anni Cinquanta, questi appunti sono la traccia di un confronto molto significativo, che coincide (cronologicamente e concettualmente) con l'elaborazione della teoria dell'agire politico che troverà espressione nelle opere successive (Vita activa, Sulla rivoluzione, e l'incompiuta Introduzione alla politica): sebbene in questi scritti non sia mai citato il nome di Schmitt, la sua presenza come interlocutore implicito è pressoché costante, e testimoniata da un gran numero di indizi testuali. Nel quarto capitolo, infine, con una rassegna della bibliografia in lingua inglese degli ultimi trent'anni, si ricostruisce il crescente interesse per l'opera di Schmitt con particolare attenzione per due casi: quello della rivista «Telos», che ne ha rielaborato il pensiero integrandolo (non senza forzature) in una prospettiva di radicalismo democratico, e quello della leggenda storiografica che ha fatto di Schmitt una sorta di ispiratore occulto del neoconservatorismo americano e dell'amministrazione Bush junior.
22
Durigon, Ilaria. "Ab integro nascitur ordo. Carl Schmitt e il diritto." Doctoral thesis, Università degli studi di Padova, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/11577/3422929.
Full textAbstract:
The dissertation, concerning the Schmitts idea of "Recht", is divided in three chapters corresponding with the three elements that constitute the juridical form: Decision, Norm and 'konkrete Ordnung'.
In the first chapter, we develop the ideas of Decision and State of exception that involves with a central role the Schmitt's analysis on Dictatorship and Constitution. Decision and State of exception are elements of juridical space. They aren't pure political elements.
The second chapter concern the Schmitt's idea of Norm. To explicate it, we analize the concept of 'total State', the critic on juridical positivism and his idea of Law.
In the third chapter, we analize the idea of 'Konkrete Ordnung'. Starting from this idea Schmitt develop his concept on Nomos.La tesi, che ha ad oggetto l'idea di diritto in Schmitt, si suddivide in tre capitoli, corrispondenti a quelli che, per l'autore, rappresentano i tre elementi del diritto: decisione, norma ed ordinamento. Nel primo capitolo si sviluppa l'idea di decisione e di stato di eccezione. Dall'analisi svolta, che si concentra sugli studi schmittiani sulla dittatura e sul custode della costituzione, essi si mostreranno come elementi propri dello spazio giuridico. Non si tratta quindi di elementi puramente politici. Il secondo capitolo ha invece ad oggetto il concetto schmittiano di norma. Per chiarirne il contenuto si svilupperanno le analisi che Schmitt fa sullo stato totale e sulla critica al positivismo e sul suo concetto di legge positiva. Nel terzo capitolo, si svilupperà infine l'idea di ordinamento concreto, idea che troverà nel Nomos la sua formazione compiuta.
23
Wilde, Marc de. "Verwantschap in extremen politieke theologie bij Walter Benjamin en Carl Schmitt /." Amsterdam : Amsterdam University Press, 2008. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10314653.
Full text
24
Vasques, Rafael Franco. "A dialética do conflito num mundo fechado. Sentido e limites da teoria política de Carl Schmitt." Master's thesis, Universidade de Évora, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10174/16973.
Full textAbstract:
O pensamento e a obra de Carl Schmitt, contínua a constituir um marco
importante para vários pensadores contemporâneos. A sua oposição ao retorno da
doutrina da guerra justa no ordenamento jurídico internacional, levou-o a tecer
severas críticas ao imperialismo americano após o final da I Guerra Mundial. A
queda do jus publicum europaeum, no entender, Schmitt, fez antever o aparecimento de
uma guerra global, em nome da humanidade e da justiça, incapaz de distinguir
militares de civis, onde o inimigo derrotado é agora perseguido, julgado e
criminalizado; The dialectic of conflict in a closed world. Meaning and limits of Carl Schmitt
political theory.
Abstract: The thought and work of Carl Schmitt continued to be an important
milestone for several major contemporary thinkers. Their opposition to the return of
just war in international law, led him to weave severe criticism of American
imperialism after the end of the First World War. The fall of jus publicum europaeum,
according to Schmitt, did foresee the emergence of a global war on behalf of
humanity and justice, unable to distinguish military from civilian, where the defeated
enemy is now pursued, tried and criminalized
25
Landois, Leonard. "Konterrevolution von links : das Staats- und Gesellschaftsverständnis der "68er" und dessen Quellen bei Carl Schmitt /." Baden-Baden Nomos, 2007. http://d-nb.info/987385445/04.
Full text
26
Molteni, Marco. "Secolarizzazione del concetto di sovranità, interpretazioni italiane del politico in Carl Schmitt /." Zürich : Zentralstelle der Studentenschaft, 1989. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb35453599s.
Full text
27
Rowan, Rory Henry. "The question of space in the work of Carl Schmitt." Thesis, University of London, 2012. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.589539.
Full textAbstract:
This thesis examines the role of space in the work of the German legal and political theorist Carl Schmitt (1888-1983). It has two fundamental aims. Firstly, to identify what role spatial concepts play in Schmitt's work. Second, to examine what relevance Schmitt's spatial thought might have for thinking about the relation between space and politics today. In response to the first question the thesis argues that spatial concepts occupy a structural position throughout Schmitt's work that has thus far been overlooked. The central claim is that Schmitt understands political order, in the absence of necessary foundations, to be fundamentally grounded upon the division of space. The division of space allows political relations to be managed within a formal framework. However, Schmitt understood this relationship between spatial division and political relations to be in crisis in the twentieth century. The thesis traces Schmitt's various attempts to address this crisis first within the horizon of the state and then on the basis of new global spatial divisions beyond the state form. In answering the second question the thesis argues that in order to assess the contemporary relevance of Schmitt's spatial thought it must be contextualized in relation to both the central concerns of his work as a whole and the political contexts within which it emerged. This is of particular importance in judging how Schmitt's involvement with National Socialism bears on the contemporary value of his thought. In conclusion the thesis argues that whilst a critical awareness of his troubling past is necessary in approaching Schmitt's work it none-the-less raises fundamental questions of enduring relevance.
28
Bulloch, Douglas. "Carl Schmitt : a conceptual exegesis and critique of IR theory." Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 2009. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/2539/.
Full textAbstract:
Carl Schmitt has something of a semi-detached relationship to IR Theory. Largely treated as an outsider or a source of critical interventions with which to unpick the dominant traditions, rather than a theorist of IR in his own right. This thesis takes a different approach. The first section outlines a broad interpretation of Carl Schmitt's main works, with a mind to discovering and examining what unites each of his theoretical interventions, insofar as they pertain to IR Theory. The next part of the thesis lays out some organising principles through which to frame a Schmittian critique of each of the main traditions of IR Theory. This commences by examining the idea of IR theory as united by a common curiosity - rather than divided by warring methodologies - revolving around questions concerning collective identification and legitimate violence. The critiques substantiate a meta-theoretical reformulation of IR theory by reference to two underlying divisions; philosophical realism against philosophical idealism on the one hand, and historical progressivism against a more static or cyclical view on the other. With this in mind, Schmitt cannot be classed as a Liberal, Marxist, or indeed a Realist, but he does clear space for a consideration of the English School as a tradition in its own right, organised around a suspicion of the idea of progress in history, and the interpretive focus of philosophical idealism. Finally, IR theory is schematised as a polemical playing field, and the recent bifurcation of IR between the 'tired old traditions' and the endless and multiplying 'critical turns' - usually informed by an individual theorist, Carl Schmitt among them - can be re-examined. Carl Schmitt thus emerges as a theorist who has much to contribute to IR Theory, not because of any particular critical insights, but because he forces a re-examination of what it means to theorise IR.
29
Kervégan, Jean-François. "Dialectique et positivité : Hegel, Carl Schmitt et l'effectivité du politique." Lyon 3, 1990. http://www.theses.fr/1990LYO31014.
Full textAbstract:
Engage depuis le 19eme siecle, le debat entre speculation philosophique et rationalite positive est ici analyse, en ce qui concerne la theorie du droit et de l'etat, a partir des oeuvres de hegel et de carl schmit(1888-1985). Une premiere partie reconstitue la "metaphysique de la positivite" qui sous-tend la conception decisionniste du droit, du politique et de l'etat qui est developpee par schmitt; elle souligne le caractere central de la thematique de l'etat total dans une pensee qui se veut le renversement systematique de la "metaphysique liberale". La deuxieme partie, partant du jugement schmittien selon lequel l'ambiguite est le caractere propre du hegelianisme, developpe une confrontation entre deux pensees qui, meme sur les points ou elles paraissent tres proches, obeissent a des principes essentiellement differents. Mais l'echo (deforme) que le decisionnisme donne de la philosophie de hegel permet de preciser la teneur et la visee de celle-ci sur un certain nombre de points critiques : le rapport entre guerre et politique, le statut problematique d'un etat de nature, la relation entre societe civile et etat, la nature de la representation politique. Son attitude envers hegel determine le point de vue de schmitt, meme la ou il est le plus critique, en sorte que le decisionnisme est l'envers "positif" de la rationalite dialectique qu'il pretend surmonterThe debate between philosophical speculation and positive rationality, which started in the nineteenth century, is analysed here in the field of the theory of the law and the state. The study is based upon the works of hegel and carl schmitt (1888-1985). The first part rebuilds the "metaphysics of the positivity" which underlies the decisionistic conception of the law, the politics and the state, which is developed by schmitt. The "total state" is emphazised as being the central topic of this thought which claims to be the systematic inversion of the "liberal metaphysics". The second part, based on schmitt's judgment that ambiguity is characteristic of hegelianism, explores the comparison between the thoughts of both authors. Their thoughts are essentially different, even when their arguments are very similar. The distorded reflection of hegel's philosophy of the mind in schmitt's decisionism allows use to clarified the sense and the goal of the first one regarding crucial points : the relation between war and politics, the problematical fonction of a state of nature, the relation between civil society and state, the nature and the role of the political representation. Decisionism must be considered as the reverse of the dialectical rationality whose ambiguity it claims
30
Baume, Sandrine. "Carl Schmitt, penseur de l'Etat : genèse d'une doctrine (1914-1938)." Paris, Institut d'études politiques, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005IEPP0021.
Full textAbstract:
Face aux nombreuses publications récentes consacrées à Carl Schmitt, cette étude repense la cohérence des travaux que l'auteur rédige durant l'entre-deux-guerres ; une cohérence qui ne soit pas lue d'emblée à la lumière des évènements qui accompagnent l'accession de Hitler à la Chancellerie, en 1933, mais davantage éclairée par le traumatisme politique qu'induisent chez Schmitt la Première Guerre et la fin de l'Empire. Après 1918, l'unité doctrinale des écrits weimariens de Schmitt se révèle, s'ils sont pensés comme une théorie de l'Etat "émiettée", dont les pièces doivent être rassemblées. Toutefois, cette unité ne peut être démontrée que si elle est rapportée à une des finalités les plus importantes de la théorie schmittienne de l'Etat, qui est cellle de repenser l'équilibre des pouvoirs à Weimar, en vue d'une revalorisation de la fonction exécutive. Excepté l'approfondissement dans la connaissance de l'oeuvre, cette étude apporte trois éléments de compréhension. Premièrement, la doctrine schmittienne de l'Etat doit être replacée dans un courant politique non marginal à Weimar -théorisé et radicalisé par Schmitt- qui souhaite redonner à l'exécutif sa primauté politique. Deuxièmement, pour comprendre la résistance "doctrinale" anti-schmittienne, qui s'est initiée dès les années 1920 (Hans Kelsen, Hermann Heller, Rudolf Smend), il est nécessaire de comprendre contre quels présupposés idéologiques elle s'est organisée. Troisièmement, un examen de la doctrine de l'Etat de Schmitt permet de saisir plus finement les ressorts de sa postérité après 1945, qui doit être également comprise à partir des réflexions schmittiennnes sur l'équilibre des pouvoirs.
31
Menezes, Daniel Francisco Nagao. "Francisco Campos, Carl Schmitt e a atuação do estado na economia." Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, 2013. http://tede.mackenzie.br/jspui/handle/tede/1281.
Full textAbstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-15T19:35:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Daniel Francisco Nagao Menezes.pdf: 1685292 bytes, checksum: 06c84e0f5b4ecf98307dd014bf587d28 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013-11-27Doctoral thesis comparing the authoritarian thinking of the Brazilian Francisco Campos and the German Carl Schmitt. Both have their intellectual apex in the 20 and 30 century helping to build the political economic model of their countries from an array of anti liberal thinking. Even without direct contact with one another, the thought of the two lawyers is very close, advocating a model of centralized state with high capacity to intervene in society. The power of intervention in society leads to changing economic and social forces, in the economic field eventually leads to a state action that organizes and guarantees a liberal model of economy, contradicting the fundamentals of anti liberal authors. Both in Brazil and in Germany we find the economic sector operating under the old rules liberals, however, with a new form of state intervention, creating a pragmatic authoritarianism I sought the efficient results of capitalism without running the risk of their ills.
Tese de doutorado que compara o pensamento autoritário do brasileiro Francisco Campos e do alemão Carl Schmitt. Ambos possuem seu ápice intelectual nas décadas de 20 e 30 do século XX ajudando a construir o modelo político econômico de seus países a partir de uma matriz de pensamento antiliberal. Mesmo não tendo contato direto um com o outro, o pensamento dos dois juristas é muito próximo, defendendo um modelo de Estado centralizado com alta capacidade de intervenção na sociedade. O poder de intervenção na sociedade leva a alteração da conjuntura de forças sociais e, no campo econômico acaba por levar a uma atuação estatal que organiza e garante um modelo liberal de economia, contradizendo os fundamentos antiliberais dos autores. Tanto no Brasil como na Alemanha encontramos o setor econômico atuando segundo as antigas regras liberais, porém, com uma nova forma de intervenção estatal, criando um autoritarismo pragmático eu buscava os resultados eficientes do capitalismo sem correr o risco de suas mazelas.
32
Godoy, Paula Véspoli. "Hans Kelsen e Carl Schmitt: o debate entre normativismo e decisionismo." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2010. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/8943.
Full textAbstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:30:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Paula Vespoli Godoy.pdf: 1033219 bytes, checksum: b0627d8e3884f58a0190d7761ac4e9bc (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010-05-10The purpose of this work is to analyze the debates between the jurists Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt occurred in between wars, during the Weimar Republic. It also purports to consider the theory and the concepts of each author on issues such as democracy, sovereignty, the power of a governor and his limitations, State of Law, strength and function of the Constitution. It analyzes the dualisms involved in this debate, among which, normativism and decisionism, Law and Power, Legal and Political affairs, normality and exception, reflections which eventually led them to the diverse answer on who must be the guardian of the Constitution : the Constitutional Court according to Kelsen s conception and the President of the Reich according to Schmitt s conception. The theoretical accounts of each author regarding the control of law constitutionality, notwithstanding having occurred on the first half of the twentieth century, still bring about studies and fierce criticisms, whether it is due to Kelsen s exacerbated formalism or to Schmitt s reactionary and authoritarian ideology. Many indoctrinators of the Theory and the Philosophy of contemporary Law and Constitutional Law address the subject to deal with the present problems of the constitutional jurisdiction. The criticisms to the formalist normativism, to the state of exception and the demo-liberal parliament model, are amongst the most analyzed issues. The contemporanity of this debate and its importance in the relentless search for the improvement of the control of constitutionality of the law and assurance of the democratic principle and the rights introduced in the Constitution is the goal of the present study
Este trabalho visa abordar o debate entre os juristas Hans Kelsen e Carl Schmitt ocorrido no entreguerras, durante a República de Weimar. Procura analisar a teoria e os conceitos que cada autor possui sobre questões como democracia, soberania, poder de um governante e seus limites, Estado de Direito, força e função da Constituição. Analisa os dualismos que permeiam este debate, dentre os quais, normativismo e decisionismo, Direito e Poder, Jurídico e Político, normalidade e exceção, reflexões que os levaram às respostas diversas sobre quem deve ser o guardião da Constituição : o Tribunal Constitucional na concepção de Kelsen e o Presidente do Reich na concepção de Schmitt. As posições teóricas de cada autor quanto ao controle de constitucionalidade das leis, não obstante terem ocorrido na primeira metade do século XX, ainda provocam estudos e críticas acirradas, seja pelo formalismo exacerbado de Kelsen ou pela ideologia reacionária e autoritária de Schmitt. Muitos doutrinadores da Teoria e da Filosofia do Direito e do Direito Constitucional contemporâneos abordam este tema para tratar dos problemas atuais da jurisdição constitucional. As críticas ao normativismo formalista, ao estado de exceção e ao modelo parlamentar demoliberal, destacam-se entre os temas mais analisados. A contemporaneidade deste debate e sua importância na incessante busca pelo aperfeiçoamento do controle de constitucionalidade das leis e garantia do princípio democrático e dos direito inseridos na Constituição são o objeto do presente estudo
33
Lima, Deyvison Rodrigues. "Pragmatismo contra normativismo: investigações sobre a teoria política de Carl Schmitt." www.teses.ufc.br, 2011. http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6531.
Full textAbstract:
LIMA, Deyvison Rodrigues. Pragmatismo contra normativismo: investigações sobre a teoria política de Carl Schmitt. 2011. 200f. – Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-graduação em Filosofia, Fortaleza (CE), 2011.Submitted by Márcia Araújo (marcia_m_bezerra@yahoo.com.br) on 2013-11-08T14:08:02Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2011-DIS-DRLIMA.pdf: 1899323 bytes, checksum: d182f48dfd32289beb392fcc4e6cf417 (MD5)
Approved for entry into archive by Márcia Araújo(marcia_m_bezerra@yahoo.com.br) on 2013-11-08T14:56:33Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2011-DIS-DRLIMA.pdf: 1899323 bytes, checksum: d182f48dfd32289beb392fcc4e6cf417 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2013-11-08T14:56:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2011-DIS-DRLIMA.pdf: 1899323 bytes, checksum: d182f48dfd32289beb392fcc4e6cf417 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011
This dissertation proposes the reconstruction of Schmitt’s thesis about the modern distinction between facticity and validity in the field of political theory. The purpose is to analyse the modern political paradigms – normative and realism – as a consequence of the problematic relationship between immediate and mediate in the political way. The hypothesis is (I) if on the one hand Schmitt’s political theory arises in opposition to the normative model, on the other it cannot be applied to the political realism – be it strong or weak – meaning an alternative theoretical proposal in the face of the rationalist mediation; therefore (II) it’s necessary to scrutinize what are the essential characteristics of the Schmittian project of restructuring of the political theory paradigm developed, generally speaking, in three distinct moments of the discussion: the first articulated by means of the notion of Entscheidung and later developed within the scope of the Theory of Exception; the second called political existentialism; and the third developed from the theory of nomos. The main findings of this research are the demonstration of Schmitt undertakes an attempt of reorganize the modern political paradigms in the face of the problem of the mediation between “being” and “ought to be”, and the possibility that the author developed the thesis of there is possible mediation, but only the immediateness of a legal force does not mediated by laws, in other words, a real and legal institutional fact between the universal and the particular by means of which needs no necessity of a normative theory of justification of law (legitimacy), for the Sein is even now, and first of all, a social reality mediated and constitued legally, hence, the legitimacy should be understood as historical and real demonstrating the cooriginality between “being” and “ought to be”, and, finally, solving the mediate/immediate paradox by means to a political pragmatism.
A presente dissertação tem como proposta a reconstrução das teses de Schmitt acerca da distinção moderna entre facticidade e validade em teoria política. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar os paradigmas políticos modernos – normativismo e realismo – como consequência do problema da relação entre imediatidade e mediatidade da forma política. A hipótese de trabalho desta pesquisa é, afinal, a investigação de que, por um lado, (I) se a teoria política de Schmitt se configura em contraposição ao modelo normativista, por outro, não se adequa ao paradigma do realismo político – seja realismo fraco seja realismo forte –, representando uma proposta teórica alternativa diante do problema da mediação racionalista; assim, (II) torna-se necessário perscrutar quais as características fundamentais do projeto schmittiano de reestruturação do paradigma da teoria política desenvolvido, de forma geral, em três momentos distintos na sua reflexão: o primeiro articulado através da noção de Entscheidung e, posteriormente, trabalhado no âmbito de uma teoria da exceção; o segundo momento denominado de existencialismo político; e o terceiro momento, desenvolvido a partir da teoria do nomos. Os resultados principais desta dissertação são a demonstração de que Schmitt empreendeu uma tentativa de reestruturação dos paradigmas políticos da modernidade diante do problema da mediação entre ser e dever-ser e, enfim, a indicação de que o autor desenvolveu a tese de que não há mediação possível, mas apenas a imediatidade de uma força jurídica não mediada por leis, ou seja, um fato institucional concreto e ordenativo entre o universal e o particular através do qual dispensa a necessidade de uma teoria normativa da justificação da ordem (legitimidade), pois o Sein é, antes de qualquer coisa, realidade social mediada e constituída juridicamente, por isso, a legitimidade deve ser compreendida como histórica e concreta demonstrando a co-originariedade entre ser e dever-ser e, assim, solucionando o paradoxo mediação/imediação através da proprosta do pragmatismo político.
34
Ferreira, Jonatas. "The dynamics of perplexity : modernity and judgement from Kant to Carl Schmitt." Thesis, Lancaster University, 1998. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.266890.
Full text
35
Jiang, Linjing [Verfasser], and Dieter [Akademischer Betreuer] Borchmeyer. "Carl Schmitt als Literaturkritiker. Eine metakritische Untersuchung. / Linjing Jiang ; Betreuer: Dieter Borchmeyer." Heidelberg : Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg, 2013. http://d-nb.info/117780977X/34.
Full text
36
Lima, Deyvison Rodrigues. "Pragmatismo contra normativismo: investigaÃÃes sobre a teoria do polÃtico em Carl Schmitt." Universidade Federal do CearÃ, 2011. http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=9168.
Full textAbstract:
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento CientÃfico e TecnolÃgicoA presente dissertaÃÃo tem como proposta a reconstruÃÃo das teses de Schmitt acerca da distinÃÃo moderna entre facticidade e validade em teoria polÃtica. O objetivo deste estudo à analisar os paradigmas polÃticos modernos â normativismo e realismo â como consequÃncia do problema da relaÃÃo entre imediatidade e mediatidade da forma polÃtica. A hipÃtese de trabalho desta pesquisa Ã, afinal, a investigaÃÃo de que, por um lado, (I) se a teoria polÃtica de Schmitt se configura em contraposiÃÃo ao modelo normativista, por outro, nÃo se adequa ao paradigma do realismo polÃtico â seja realismo fraco seja realismo forte â, representando uma proposta teÃrica alternativa diante do problema da mediaÃÃo racionalista; assim, (II) torna-se necessÃrio perscrutar quais as caracterÃsticas fundamentais do projeto schmittiano de reestruturaÃÃo do paradigma da teoria polÃtica desenvolvido, de forma geral, em trÃs momentos distintos na sua reflexÃo: o primeiro articulado atravÃs da noÃÃo de Entscheidung e, posteriormente, trabalhado no Ãmbito de uma teoria da exceÃÃo; o segundo momento denominado de existencialismo polÃtico; e o terceiro momento, desenvolvido a partir da teoria do nomos. Os resultados principais desta dissertaÃÃo sÃo a demonstraÃÃo de que Schmitt empreendeu uma tentativa de reestruturaÃÃo dos paradigmas polÃticos da modernidade diante do problema da mediaÃÃo entre ser e dever-ser e, enfim, a indicaÃÃo de que o autor desenvolveu a tese de que nÃo hà mediaÃÃo possÃvel, mas apenas a imediatidade de uma forÃa jurÃdica nÃo mediada por leis, ou seja, um fato institucional concreto e ordenativo entre o universal e o particular atravÃs do qual dispensa a necessidade de uma teoria normativa da justificaÃÃo da ordem (legitimidade), pois o Sein Ã, antes de qualquer coisa, realidade social mediada e constituÃda juridicamente, por isso, a legitimidade deve ser compreendida como histÃrica e concreta demonstrando a co-originariedade entre ser e dever-ser e, assim, solucionando o paradoxo mediaÃÃo/imediaÃÃo atravÃs da proprosta do pragmatismo polÃtico.
This dissertation proposes the reconstruction of Schmittâs thesis about the modern distinction between facticity and validity in the field of political theory. The purpose is to analyse the modern political paradigms â normative and realism â as a consequence of the problematic relationship between immediate and mediate in the political way. The hypothesis is (I) if on the one hand Schmittâs political theory arises in opposition to the normative model, on the other it cannot be applied to the political realism â be it strong or weak â meaning an alternative theoretical proposal in the face of the rationalist mediation; therefore (II) itâs necessary to scrutinize what are the essential characteristics of the Schmittian project of restructuring of the political theory paradigm developed, generally speaking, in three distinct moments of the discussion: the first articulated by means of the notion of Entscheidung and later developed within the scope of the Theory of Exception; the second called political existentialism; and the third developed from the theory of nomos. The main findings of this research are the demonstration of Schmitt undertakes an attempt of reorganize the modern political paradigms in the face of the problem of the mediation between âbeingâ and âought to beâ, and the possibility that the author developed the thesis of there is possible mediation, but only the immediateness of a legal force does not mediated by laws, in other words, a real and legal institutional fact between the universal and the particular by means of which needs no necessity of a normative theory of justification of law (legitimacy), for the Sein is even now, and first of all, a social reality mediated and constitued legally, hence, the legitimacy should be understood as historical and real demonstrating the cooriginality between âbeingâ and âought to beâ, and, finally, solving the mediate/immediate paradox by means to a political pragmatism.
37
Batistella, Marco Antonio. "O poder da ordem e a ordem do poder em Carl Schmitt." Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Parana, 2012. http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/handle/tede/2132.
Full textAbstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-10T18:26:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Marco Antonio Batistella.pdf: 799527 bytes, checksum: dbc91deb2735fdf399e489e052aba482 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-11-14Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
It is intended in this dissertation thematize the notion of Power in the work of Carl Schmitt in order to problematize the concepto of the Political of the thesis in Power and Order that is inextricably perfect space conflictual politics. This claim is argumentative strategy to answer the following problem to be treated: if, on one hand, Carl Schmitt undertakes a relentless critique of "normativism" the liberal order so, however, does not waive the need for establishment of a normative order as is possible, however, to reconcile normativadade with a substantial political and non-liberal? In this context, proposes to tracejar two spheres systematic exposure, namely: 1) A critical part: containing a historical-conceptual exposition of the political structure to which Carl Schmitt controversially ensnares its antithetical force of argument, 2) A part-dogmatic conceptual: in which he exposes the positioning - decisionist - Carl Schmitt, and the way the author bases its claim of theoretical Political conceive as a typical scope of conflict and the exercise of power and law. To satisfy this proposal will provide the development of three chapters articulated. Therefore, we intend to develop in the first chapter the historical and philosophical assumptions of the crisis of modern rule of law in order to highlight the main theses articulated by current contractarian political thinkers who formed the so-called doctrine of modern natural law. In this scope, it is suggested that, noted some nuances unique and distinctive among leading theorists of that chain, there is the common denominator consistent in the primacy of the individual over the decision-making power of the State. In the second chapter, we intend to articulate how the proposed rules of Hans Kelsen is closely linked with the modern jusnaturalism. It is suggested from the outset that Kelsen proposes the theory under which the state reduces to the law, or the State / Force the Norm / Law. Indeed, it is argued that the Order engineered by normativism active in the Weimar Republic, in attempting to "neutral", presupposes the absence of a decision-maker, since where rationality of Law operates no voluntas, with no place, therefore, to mention both the "state of exception" as the meaning of "sovereignty" policy, except the "Sovereignty of Law." For ultimate, intended to articulate the last chapter, the design of Power schmittian the likeness of the very phenomenon constitutive condition of human life in the world, and argue that their manifestation does not cease to exist, or else do not reduce their intensity when the political relationship between the men. In view of this, we aim to address two notions instilled in indissoluble relation between Power and Order. These are the notion of "constituent power" and the principle of formal political "representation." These two notions expressed in Carl Schmitt, the way becomes apparent homogeneity of the people at the expense of pluralism of liberal order. Altogether the work of Carl Schmitt, and outlined the proposal of this dissertation, the objective is, ultimately, to understand how the author, in his defense of the Political, undertakes a justification of State and Law, light inextricable relationship between power and Order.
Pretende-se nessa dissertação tematizar a noção de Poder na obra de Carl Schmitt de modo a problematizar o conceito de Político sob a tese de que Poder e Ordem se aperfeiçoam indissociavelmente no espaço conflitivo da política. Essa pretensão constitui estratégia argumentativa para a resposta do seguinte problema a ser tratado: se, de um lado, Carl Schmitt empreende uma incessante crítica ao normativismo da ordem liberal de modo a, todavia, não renunciar a necessidade de constituição de uma ordem normativa, como é possível, por outro lado, conciliar a normativadade com uma ordem política substancial e não-liberal? Nesse contexto, propôe-se tracejar dois âmbitos sistemáticos de exposição, a saber: 1) Um âmbito crítico: contendo uma exposição histórico-conceitual da estrutura política para a qual Carl Schmitt polemicamente enreda sua força antitética de argumentação; 2) Um âmbito dogmático-conceitual: no qual se expôe o posicionamento decisionista de Carl Schmitt, além do modo como o autor alicerça sua pretensão teórica de conceber o Político como um âmbito típico de conflito e de exercício do Poder e do Direito. Para satisfazer a presente proposta, estipular-se-á o desenvolvimento de três capítulos articulados. Assim sendo, pretende-se desenvolver no primeiro capítulo os pressupostos históricos e filosóficos da crise do Estado de Direito Moderno, a fim de ressaltar as principais teses articuladas pelos pensadores políticos da corrente contratualista que compuseram a denominada Doutrina do Direito Natural Moderno. Nesse escopo, sugere-se que, anotadas algumas nuances singulares e distintivas entre os principais teóricos daquela corrente, há o denominador comum consistente na primazia do indivíduo em detrimento do poder decisório do Estado. Ao segundo capítulo, pretende-se articular como a proposta normativa de Hans Kelsen está intimamente articulada com o jusnaturalismo moderno. Sugere-se, à partida, que Kelsen propõe a tese sob a qual o Estado reduz-se ao Direito, ou o Estado/Força à Norma/Direito. Com efeito, argumenta-se que a Ordem arquitetada pelo normativismo operante na República de Weimar, ao pretender-se neutra , pressupõe a inexistência de uma instância decisória, dado que, onde a racionalidade da Lei opera, não há voluntas, não havendo lugar, portanto, para se mencionar tanto o estado de exceção quanto o significado de soberania política, exceto a Soberania da Lei . Por derradeiro, pretende-se articular no último capítulo, a concepção schmittiana do Poder à semelhança de fenômeno constitutivo da própria condição da vida humana no mundo, bem como argumentar que sua manifestação não deixará de existir ou, então, não se reduzirá sua intensidade quando da relação política entre os homens. À vista disso, objetiva-se abordar duas noções incutidas na relação indissociável entre Poder e Ordem. Tratam-se da noção de poder constituinte e do princípio político-formal da representação . Essas duas noções expressam, em Carl Schmitt, a forma pela qual se torna manifesta a homogeneidade do povo em detrimento do pluralismo da ordem liberal. No conjunto da obra de Carl Schmitt, assim esboçada a proposta dessa dissertação, objetiva-se, em última instância, compreender como o autor, em sua defesa do Político, empreende uma justificativa do Estado e do Direito, a luz da relação inextrincável entre Poder e Ordem.
38
D, Urso Flavia. "Perspectivas sobre a soberania em Carl Schmitt, Michel Foucault e Giorgio Agamben." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2014. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11655.
Full textAbstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-27T17:27:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Flavia D Urso.pdf: 1616648 bytes, checksum: f578da696de954a5e5e0f53b4ba54798 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014-06-03Sovereignty is a concept made shallow as it presents frail theoretical solutions when applied to aspects from reality. The research hereby aims at understanding Giorgio Agamben s diagnosis on sovereignty by going through the core of Carl Schmitt s thinking in his theory of the sovereign power as well as the displacement of such problem in Michel Foucault s writings. Agamben is an intellectual who perused stern philosophical pathways, sovereignty having stood first and foremost for him along the issue of the potentiality of not being. His approach to reality takes place through the motto to prefer not to, from which he glimpses one possibility for putting down one s relationship between wanting and being able to, and between the constituent and constituted powers. And such annihilation is in effect essential for Agamben since his concept of sovereignty takes into consideration a juridical category not only weakened of its representativeness but most of all originating from an unprecedented biopolitical catastrophe. The path chosen by Agamben for such conclusion is one of a paradigmatic ontology, that is, the axes of understanding for the phenomena which ousted political character from juridical ordinances. The paradigms nuda vita (bare life) and the state of exception mainly constitute the structural elements whose function is to ultimately keep the exception-ridden life of the law. The bottleneck established by sovereignty is undone by a new form-of-life, which means the absolute desecration of a life power over which neither sovereignty nor the law can have control over
A soberania é conceito esvaziado porque apresenta frágeis soluções teóricas quando aplicadas aos aspectos da realidade. Esta pesquisa tem por objetivo a compreensão do diagnóstico de Giorgio Agamben a respeito da soberania percorrendo a centralidade da teoria do poder soberano do pensamento de Carl Schmitt e o deslocamento do problema em Michel Foucault. Agamben é um intelectual de árido percurso filosófico e a soberania para ele, antes de tudo, é uma questão da potencialidade de não ser. A sua aproximação da realidade se dá pela fórmula preferiria não, na qual ele vislumbra uma possibilidade de destruição da relação entre querer e poder, entre poder constituinte e poder constituído. E tal destruição, de fato, é essencial para Agamben porque o seu conceito de soberania considera uma categoria jurídica não só esvaziada de representação, mas, sobretudo, originária de uma catástrofe biopolítica sem precedentes. O caminho escolhido por Agamben para essa conclusão é o de uma ontologia paradigmática, ou seja, eixos de entendimento para os fenômenos que destituíram o caráter político do ordenamento jurídico. Os paradigmas da nuda vita e do estado de exceção, principalmente, são elementos estruturais da soberania cuja função é, enfim, o de manter a vida excepcionada do direito. O nó estabelecido pela soberania desata-se por uma nova forma-de-vida, o que significa uma absoluta profanação de uma potência da vida sobre a qual nem a soberania, nem o direito podem ter mais controle
39
Berthold, Lutz [Verfasser]. "Carl Schmitt und der Staatsnotstandsplan am Ende der Weimarer Republik. / Lutz Berthold." Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 1999. http://d-nb.info/1238296114/34.
Full text
40
Heimes, Claus [Verfasser]. "Politik und Transzendenz. : Ordnungsdenken bei Carl Schmitt und Eric Voegelin. / Claus Heimes." Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2009. http://d-nb.info/1238358071/34.
Full text
41
Vagdoutis, Nikolaos. "Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt in Weimar : a riddle of political constitutionalism." Thesis, University of Glasgow, 2018. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/9076/.
Full textAbstract:
This thesis approaches the Weimar constitutional debate by focusing on its most significant participants, Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt. It reveals that this debate concerned the constitutional question in the context of the contradiction between the democratic modern state and the capitalist economy. It was in that sense a debate on the 'riddle' that was identified by the young Marx concerning the problem of the political form through which modern societies are regulated, caught between the political question, namely that of political power, and by the social question, namely that of the socio-economic structures of power. In effect the term “political constitutionalism” captures this tension through which Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt approached the constitutional question. The historical context of the Weimar Republic is important in order to bring into the light the theories of Kelsen and Schmitt (and, secondarily, of other Weimar theorists who also approached the constitutional question through similar problématiques). Regarding this context, it is, firstly, demonstrated that the Weimar Constitution was a post-traditional constitution that dealt both with the political question (the introduction of parliamentary democracy) and with the “social question” through its “economic constitution”. It is, secondly, demonstrated how the relationship between political and socio-economic power affected, in turn, the constitutional order throughout Weimar by leading ultimately to its structural transformation. This thesis argues, firstly, that Schmitt’s solution to Marx’s riddle dissociated the constitution from its democratic promise in order to protect a concept of constitutionalism that would maintain the 19th century liberal political-economic divide. Hence, it ended up as a theory of “authoritarian liberalism” that legitimized the “structural transformation” of the Weimar constitutional order between 1930-32; secondly, that Kelsen’s solution, while placing emphasis on the association of the constitution with the democratic promise, underplayed the power of the capitalist mode of production to affect both the State and the constitutional order itself. As a result, and although he defended the Republic and the Weimar Constitution, he could not see that the constitution itself was traversed by the power of capital in its entanglement with the mode of production.
42
Guerra, Elizabete O. "O espaço do político na modernidade segundo Carl Schmitt e Hannanh Arendt." Florianópolis, SC, 2008. http://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/91247.
Full textAbstract:
Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia.Made available in DSpace on 2012-10-23T20:31:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 251719.pdf: 700475 bytes, checksum: 38d1429c318472cd1ffc1512077fc1fa (MD5)
Este trabalho tem por objetivo a investigação acerca do espaço do político na modernidade à luz das análises de Carl Schmitt e Hannah Arendt. Explora-se a relação entre o pensamento dos autores, e tenta-se estabelecer um diálogo entre ambos. Para isso, dividiu-se a exposição em três partes. A primeira trata do pensamento político de Schmitt, onde se aborda os principais conceitos que norteiam seu pensamento, e as críticas dirigidas pelo autor ao sistema liberal. A segunda ocupa-se com as análises de Arendt, e traça seu caminho percorrido na busca pelo significado da política moderna, após o crescimento da sociedade de massas e do surgimento da esfera do social. A terceira parte, amparada pelo conceito de visão paralaxe, estabelece um confronto entre as reflexões de ambos, e identifica os pontos de contato entre suas análises, bem como os aspectos em que divergem. Por meio da realização desta pesquisa identificou-se que tanto para Schmitt quanto para Arendt, salvaguardando as devidas diferenças, a política praticamente inexiste na modernidade, e que o Estado moderno transformou-se em uma instância puramente administrativa.
43
Erices, Reyes Juan Eduardo, and Velásquez Lucas Martin Murillo. "Sobre la democracia : críticas jurídico-políicas de Carl Schmitt al Estado Legislativo Parlamentarista." Tesis, Universidad de Chile, 2019. http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/170417.
Full textAbstract:
Memoria para optar al grado de Licenciado en Ciencias Jurídicas y SocialesEl objeto de este escrito es examinar el concepto de Democracia en la teoría jurídico-constitucional de Carl Schmitt, en oposición a la caracterización que le otorga el pensamiento liberal. En consideración a este supuesto, analizaremos la presente problemática desde dos flancos. En primer lugar, atenderemos la conceptualización de Democracia que desarrolla el jurista en su orgánica jurídica, con miras a desarrollar la arquitectura política del concepto hacia una forma democrática sustancial, en observancia a la idea de representación y forma política. En este sentido, analizaremos su argumentación considerando las nociones fundamentales de legitimidad; pueblo; poder constituyente; y los principios de identidad y representación. En segundo lugar, revisaremos la conceptualización de Democracia en la teoría liberal, a partir de un tratamiento sistemático de las principales críticas jurídico-políticas que realiza Carl Schmitt al Estado Legislativo Parlamentarista, dada su oposición al desarrollo práctico de este modelo durante el siglo XX para la correcta realización de un proyecto de Democracia directa. En base a ello, profundizaremos sobre los principios de discusión pública; publicidad; igualdad de chance; representación; e identidad. En último término, a modo de consideraciones finales, confrontaremos los planteamientos de ambos sistemas, con el propósito de presentar observaciones críticas, en atención a los presupuestos fácticos de la modernidad
44
Barreto, Carmem Lúcia Brito Tavares. "A psicologia clínica e o mal-estar contemporâneo: impasses e re-significações." Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, 2001. http://www.unicap.br/tede//tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=82.
Full textAbstract:
Este estudo tem como objetivo compreender o mal-estar contemporâneo partindo da experiência clínica. Traduz um verdadeiro testemunho da autora enquanto pesquisadora, psicoterapeuta e supervisora. Parte de inquietações desalojadoras experienciadas na clínica e utiliza como objeto de reflexão teórica a Abordagem Centrada na Pessoa, mais especificamente, a Terapia Centrada no Cliente. Realiza uma leitura crítica da teoria da Terapia Centrada no Cliente, analisando a concepção de ciência e a trajetória conceitual empreendida por Carl Rogers. Partindo dessa analise, aponta para a insuficiência dos conceitos de Tendência Atualizante e Angústia para acolher e dar passagem ao mal-estar contemporâneo, indicando a necessidade de uma outra via de acesso que apreenda a condição fundamental e originária do homem. Por fim, apresenta o conceito de angústia de Heidegger enquanto possível contribuição para fecundar e re-significar a prática clínica. Como resultado do percurso empreendido, a autora revela o momento de trânsito em que se encontra, encaminhando-se para uma clínica psicológica enquanto cuidar (Sorge), vinculada a uma teoria do existir humano que pode ser lida como uma ética de aceitação da finitude, da transitoriedade, e dos conflitos. Tal teoria enseja uma prática clínica, que envolva um ato de criação, como abertura de acolhimento para algo que não se conhece, com disponibilidade para se lançar nas complexidades do ser-aí. Aponta que, apesar de ter encontrado algumas respostas para as inquietações desalojadoras que motivaram o presente estudo, a temática abordada, pela sua complexidade e dinâmica própria, esteve e estará sempre aberta a novos olhares e leiturasDeparting from clinical experience, this study aims to comprehend the contemporary uneasiness. It shows the author's true testimony not only as a researcher, but also as a psychotherapist and supervisor. This research is based on disruptive clinical experiences by taking into account, as object for theoretical reflection, within the Person-Centered Approach, the Client-Centered Therapy. It makes a critical overview of the Client-Centered Therapy theory by analyzing Carl Rogers' concept of science as well as his conceptual path. Such analysis points to an insufficiency of the Actualizing Tendency and Anguish concepts toward sheltering and, at the same time, to promote a passage for the contemporary uneasiness. Thus, it indicates the need of another way to access and comprehend the fundamental and original human condition. Finally, this study presents Heidegger's anguish concept as a possible contribution to fertilize and re-signify the clinical praxis. As a result of such path, the author reveals her transitional moment of theoretical reflection, directing herself toward a psychological conception of clinic as "care" (Sorge), linked to a human existence theory conceived as an ethics of finitude acceptance, of transivity and conflicts. Such a theory demands a clinical praxis by conceiving a creation act as an opening to shelter something unknown, plenty of availability to carry forward onweself towards the "being-there complexity. The author manifests that, in spite to have found some possible answers to her dislodged inquietude experience that motivated this actual work, its approached thematic, by its own complexity and dynamic involved, implies in an always present openness that instigate new sights and reflections, thus deserving further re-readings
45
Dutton, Brett. "Leo Strauss's Recovery of the Political: The City and Man as a reply to Carl Schmitt's The Concept of the Political." Thesis, The University of Sydney, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/631.
Full textAbstract:
This dissertation demonstrates that Leo Strauss, in The City and Man, continues his response to Carl Schmitt�s arguments concerning the affirmation of the political, as outlined by Strauss in his 1932 article on Schmitt�s The Concept of the Political. In affirming the political, Strauss spoke of the 'theologico-political problem', or the question regarding who, or what, should rule society. Strauss outlines six criteria in his 1932 'Comments', which he argues can be found in Schmitt�s The Concept of the Political, as essential for the recovery of the political. In raising the question of the political, both Schmitt and Strauss return to the fundamental question regarding how one should live. In so doing, Strauss rejects Schmitt�s reliance on conflicting faiths and returns to the Socratic description of the best regime (politeia), understood as the best way of life, that is devoted to contemplation, peace and justice. In his argument in The City and Man, Strauss satisfies the six criteria outlined in his 'Comments': (1) the acceptance of moral evil within human nature; (2) the problem of opposition among groups; (3) the possibility of a non-neutral, transprivate obligation; (4) the need for a content that determines the distinction between friend and enemy; (5) a content that leads to a quarrel over the question of 'what is Right?' and (6) that the political must address 'the order of human things from a pure and whole knowledge'. This thesis demonstrates that Strauss�s 1964 book, The City and Man, indirectly addresses Schmitt�s general criteria, using an interpretation of Thucydides�s, Aristotle�s and Plato�s best regime � which is linked to the pursuit of wisdom, or the philosophic life � to provide a transpolitical standard that opposes Schmitt�s insistence on 'concrete' experience, that relies on historical destiny, and faith, as the guide to political life.
46
Dutton, Brett. "Leo Strauss's Recovery of the Political: The City and Man as a reply to Carl Schmitt's The Concept of the Political." University of Sydney. Government and International Relations School of Economics and Political Science, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/631.
Full textAbstract:
This dissertation demonstrates that Leo Strauss, in The City and Man, continues his response to Carl Schmitt�s arguments concerning the affirmation of the political, as outlined by Strauss in his 1932 article on Schmitt�s The Concept of the Political. In affirming the political, Strauss spoke of the 'theologico-political problem', or the question regarding who, or what, should rule society. Strauss outlines six criteria in his 1932 'Comments', which he argues can be found in Schmitt�s The Concept of the Political, as essential for the recovery of the political. In raising the question of the political, both Schmitt and Strauss return to the fundamental question regarding how one should live. In so doing, Strauss rejects Schmitt�s reliance on conflicting faiths and returns to the Socratic description of the best regime (politeia), understood as the best way of life, that is devoted to contemplation, peace and justice. In his argument in The City and Man, Strauss satisfies the six criteria outlined in his 'Comments': (1) the acceptance of moral evil within human nature; (2) the problem of opposition among groups; (3) the possibility of a non-neutral, transprivate obligation; (4) the need for a content that determines the distinction between friend and enemy; (5) a content that leads to a quarrel over the question of 'what is Right?' and (6) that the political must address 'the order of human things from a pure and whole knowledge'. This thesis demonstrates that Strauss�s 1964 book, The City and Man, indirectly addresses Schmitt�s general criteria, using an interpretation of Thucydides�s, Aristotle�s and Plato�s best regime � which is linked to the pursuit of wisdom, or the philosophic life � to provide a transpolitical standard that opposes Schmitt�s insistence on 'concrete' experience, that relies on historical destiny, and faith, as the guide to political life.
47
Morris, Edwin Kent. "Liberal Democracy & the Political: A Comparison of Carl Schmitt and Sheldon S. Wolin." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/42167.
Full textAbstract:
This study concerns the terms liberalism, the political, democracy, and liberal democracy focusing on the application of the terms in the discourse of two distinct political theorists: Carl Schmitt and Sheldon S. Wolin. I address the question of whether similarities exist between Schmitt and Wolinâ s theories? Specifically, are there similarities in their use of the terms listed above? Although both emphasize different aspects of the terms, I suggest they simultaneously share similar perspectives on them. In particular, I suggest that Schmitt and Wolin share in common attributes in their views on the purported problematic of liberal democracy. Furthermore, I suggest both theorists speak to the general concern that if the political cannot be realized, then democracy cannot be practice.Master of Arts
48
Campderrich, Bravo Ramon. "Derecho, política y orden internacional en la obra de Carl Schmitt (1919-1945)." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/2964.
Full textAbstract:
Esta tesis tiene por objeto la doctrina jurídica y política de Carl Schmitt correspondiente al período de madurez y de mayor fecundidad de este autor, comprendido entre el final de la Primera Guerra Mundial y el final de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. La presente tesis pretende hacer una modesta contribución a los esfuerzos por superar las deficiencias de la literatura secundaria acerca del pensamiento schmittiano. En contraste con la inmensa mayoría de las publicaciones sobre Schmitt existentes, el contexto histórico en cuyo marco se desenvuelve la obra schmittiana, las partes de esa obra publicadas en los años del III Reich y las tesis schmittianas sobre el derecho y las relaciones internacionales ocupan un lugar preponderante en esta tesis. En efecto, por un lado, la integración del análisis del contexto histórico político en el tratamiento de las tesis schmittianas se ha considerado decisivo a la hora de abordar estas últimas; por otro lado, el análisis de las ideas schmittianas del período nazi y de aquellas relativas al derecho y a las relaciones internacionales ocupa un espacio mucho mayor que la exposición del punto tradicionalmente más trabajado por los estudiosos de Schmitt, el decisionismo.
Como se ha indicado anteriormente, el objeto de esta tesis es la doctrina jurídica y política desarrollada por Carl Schmitt entre el final de la Primera Guerra Mundial y la terminación de la Segunda. Para estructurar la exposición de los resultados a que se ha llegado en el análisis de dicho objeto, me he inspirado en la clásica dicotomía entre soberanía "interna" y soberanía "externa". Los dos primeros capítulos de esta tesis están dedicados a las doctrinas jurídico-políticas schmittianas relativas a cuestiones de soberanía "interna", esto es, a problemas y temas de orden intraestatal. El primer capítulo analiza la doctrina jurídico-política decisionista sostenida por Schmitt en los años de la República de Weimar y las tesis jurídico-constitucionales schmittianas básicas formuladas en aquellos años necesarias para un mejor entendimiento del decisionismo. El segundo capítulo se ocupa de la reflexión schmittiana en el plano jurídico-político interno desarrollada en los años del régimen nazi y su relación con la legitimación y consolidación de ese régimen. Los dos últimos capítulos están destinados, en cambio, a posibilitar la comprensión de las ideas schmittianas acerca de temas de soberanía "externa", es decir, relativas al derecho y al orden internacionales. El capítulo tercero constituye un necesario paso previo a la explicación del pensamiento schmittiano en materia de derecho y relaciones internacionales. En este capítulo se analiza el pacifismo jurídico del período de entreguerras, que fue considerado por Schmitt su gran adversario doctrinal en el campo de la especulación sobre la soberanía "externa". El capítulo cuarto, por último, examina la doctrina schmittiana sobre el derecho y el orden internacionales propiamente dicha. La tesis finaliza con unas páginas conclusivas, en las cuales se intenta sintetizar las líneas maestras de la reflexión schmittiana objeto del análisis desplegado en los capítulos precedentes.
"LAW, POLITICS AND INTERNATIONAL ORDER IN CARL SCHMITT´S WORK (1919-1945)"
The subject of this Ph. D. Research is Carl Schmitt´s juridical and political thought between the end of the Great War and the end of the Second World War. The Ph. D. Research is composed of four chapters and conclusions. The two initial chapters of this Ph. D. Research deal with the decisionist juridical and political doctrine, which Schmitt upheld in the Weimar Republic years, and with the schmittian constitutional basic ideas of that time whose understanding is needed to a better comprehension of the schmittian decisionism. The second chapter pays attention to the schmittian reflection unfolded under the nazi régime years and its relation with the legitimation and the consolidation of that political régime. The two last chapters purpose, instead, is to make possible the understanding of the schmittian ideas about the "external" sovereignty, that is to say, ideas about the international law and relations. The third chapter is a necessary previous step in order to explain the schmittian thought in the matter of international law and international relations. This chapter analyses the kelsenian juridical pacifism of the inter-war period, which was considered by Schmitt his major adversary in the field of the "external" sovereignty. Finally, the fourth chapter examines the true schmittian doctrine about the international law and order. The Ph. D. Research ends with some conclusive pages, in which a synthesis of the schmittian thought guidelines is undertaken.
49
Orsi, Roberto. "Rethinking the concept of order in international politics : Carl Schmitt and Jürgen Habermas." Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 2012. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/750/.
Full textAbstract:
The concept of order in international politics, despite its very frequent use in all strands of ir literature, is seldom explicitly addressed as an object of analytical reflection and definition, and remains often opaque. This research aims to clarify the nature of order as a concept within ir theory, by highlighting its constitutive elements and by positioning it within the horizon of current political-philosophical and sociological discussions. This thesis starts with a literature review showing the limitedness of the ways in which order is employed as a concept in many ir theoretical works, while underscoring its critical problematisation as the main path towards its clarification. Following and integrating Nicholas Rengger’s seminal work on the topic, this research argues that the concept of order, which entails the double nature of a descriptive/explanatory but also normative account of reality, has to be understood within a philosophical discussion of the political, lying between the two poles of political theology (Carl Schmitt) and the sociological theory of secularisation (Jürgen Habermas). While introducing and discussing the two authors, this thesis illustrates the roles which they have assumed in inspiring ir theoretical work (in critical theory), pointing at the limits of their established readings within the discipline and offering new perspectives, which should essentially rely on a more direct critical politicisation of the sacred. This thesis proceeds with an exploration of the problem of order in the modern condition, through a reconstruction and a discussion of the common Weberian genealogy in both Schmitt and Habermas, focusing on the importance of the sociology of religion for the conceptualisation of the political in modernity (Schmitt) and of the concepts of rationality and rationalisation (Habermas) respectively. Against this background, a critique of the Habermasian view on secularisation is developed, as Habermas’s argument appears to be an incomplete answer to the problem of the symbolic relations between the religious and the political, and hence of his conceptualisation of political order, a problem which is also reflected at the level of international politics. Note: translations of original texts in this thesis are done by the author unless otherwise specified.
50
Hong, Muwon [Verfasser]. "Die Großraumtheorie von Carl Schmitt im Vergleich mit dem ostasiatischen Völkerrechtsverständnis. / Muwon Hong." Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2019. http://d-nb.info/1238487297/34.
Full text