Academic literature on the topic 'Charlottetown Accord'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Charlottetown Accord.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Charlottetown Accord"

1

Venne, Sharon. "TREATY INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND THE CHARLOTTETOWN ACCORD: THE MESSAGE IN THE BREEZE." Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel 4, no. 1 - 4 (2011): 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.21991/c9zq0w.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Johnston, Richard. "An Inverted Logroll: The Charlottetown Accord and the Referendum." PS: Political Science and Politics 26, no. 1 (1993): 43. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/419503.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Johnston, Richard. "An Inverted Logroll: The Charlottetown Accord and the Referendum." PS: Political Science & Politics 26, no. 01 (1993): 43–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s104909650003729x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Leydet, Dominique. "Compromise and Public Debate in Processes of Constitutional Reform: the Canadian Case." Social Science Information 43, no. 2 (2004): 233–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0539018404042581.

Full text
Abstract:
In this article, I concentrate on one central issue that has arisen since the 1987 Meech Lake Accord and the 1992 Charlottetown Accord failed to secure sufficient popular support to allow their ratification. Many theorists have argued that there exists an unavoidable disjunction between the kind of compromise agreement that can come out of complex intergovernmental negotiations and the type of outcome that a majority of citizens might be made to support. Any agreement produced by formal talks can be presumed to have involved significant logrolling and be made of various, mutually dependent, se
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Choudhry, Sujit. "BEYOND THE FLIGHT FROM CONSTITUTIONAL LEGALISM: RETHINKING THE POLITICS OF SOCIAL POLICY POST-CHARLOTTETOWN." Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel 12, no. 1, 2 & 3 (2011): 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.21991/c9d37c.

Full text
Abstract:
A decade after the demise of the Charlottetown Accord in 1992,1 one of the most visible features of federal-provincial relations is the replacement of constitutional with non-constitutional policy instruments to secure many of the same ends — what I term the “flight from constitutional legalism.” Instead of constitutional amendments, the instrument of choice is the non-legal, intergovernmental accord. The leading examples are the Social Union Framework Agreement2 and the Agreement on Internal Trade,3 which in differing levels of detail set out both a normative framework and an institutional ar
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Bissonnette, Alain. "Le droit à l’autonomie gouvernementale des peuples autochtones : un phénix qui renaîtra de ses cendres." Revue générale de droit 24, no. 1 (2019): 5–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1057013ar.

Full text
Abstract:
Dans cet article, l’auteur soutient qu’en dépit de l’échec de l’Accord de Charlottetown, le droit à l’autonomie gouvernementale des peuples autochtones continuera d’être discuté, négocié et mis en oeuvre tant au plan interne qu’en vertu du droit international. Dans une première partie, il décrit les principales dispositions de l’Accord de Charlottetown et explique, en se servant des leçons de l’anthropologie juridique, les raisons de l’échec de cet accord notamment auprès d’une portion importante des personnes membres des peuples autochtones. Dans une seconde partie, il décrit l’état actuel du
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Chartrand, Paul L. A. H. "THE HARD CASE OF DEFINING “THE MÉTIS PEOPLE” AND THEIR RIGHTS: A COMMENT ON R. V. POWLEY." Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel 12, no. 1, 2 & 3 (2011): 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.21991/c98d5g.

Full text
Abstract:
Section 35(2) of the Constitution Act, 1982 refers to “the Métis people” as one of the Aboriginal peoples of Canada whose existing Aboriginal and treaty rights are guaranteed by section 35(1).1 The subsequent First Ministers Conference on Aboriginal Constitutional Reform in the 1980s and the Charlottetown Accord in 1992 proved inadequate to the task of addressing the substantive content of these constitutional provisions. The unenviable task of defining a people and their rights has now fallen to the courts. The challenge facing them is the hard case of Canadian Aboriginal law.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Lusztig, Michael. "Constitutional Paralysis: Why Canadian Constitutional Initiatives Are Doomed to Fail." Canadian Journal of Political Science 27, no. 4 (1994): 747–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008423900022010.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract. The primary lesson to be learned from the failed Charlottetown Accord is that substantive constitutional reform in Canada is not possible, and will not be for some time. This claim is structurally grounded—a reflection of inherent limitations to successful constitutional negotiations. Specifically, it contends that the requirement of mass input/legitimization of constitutional bargaining in deeply divided societies is incompatible with successful constitution making. There are two reasons for this conclusion. First, mass legitimization serves to undermine effective elite accommodatio
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

McWhinney, Andrew. "From Aggression to Acceptance: The Shifting of Quebecois Nationalist Attitudes in Relation to Indigenous Nationalism in Canada." Political Science Undergraduate Review 3, no. 1 (2018): 26–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.29173/psur45.

Full text
Abstract:
This essay examines the shifting relationship between Quebecois and Indigenous nationalism, tracing a historical path from post-Quiet Revolution Quebec to the signing of the “La Paix des Braves” document in 2002. Nationalist attitudes in Quebec were initially hostile towards their Indigenous counterparts, due to the Indigenous push of a three-nation conception of Canada which undermined the Quebecois dualist English-French founding narrative upon which Quebecois nationalist claims rested. This essay argues that Quebecois nationalist attitudes have grown more accepting over time in response to
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Dawson, Mary. "From the Backroom to the Front Line: Making Constitutional History or Encounters with the Constitution: Patriation, Meech Lake, and Charlottetown." McGill Law Journal 57, no. 4 (2012): 955–1000. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1013035ar.

Full text
Abstract:
Toward the end of the previous century, Canadians experienced an unprecedented period of constitutional activity involving changes and proposed changes to our constitution, three referendums, and a series of important court decisions. The patriation of the constitution of Canada was formally proclaimed in Canada on April 17, 1982. The new amending formula was tested in a series of constitutional negotiations. The two most prominent of the proposed amendments, the Meech Lake and Charlottetown Accords, although ultimately unsuccessful, had a very significant impact. A number of other, less exten
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Charlottetown Accord"

1

Summerville, Tracy. "Political culture, the relationship between organizational identity and individual identity : an exploration of the Charlottetown Accord." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1998. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk1/tape11/PQDD_0004/NQ39396.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

"Analysis of the Aboriginal government provisions of the 1992 Charlottetown Accord : self-government in the "post-Charlottetown" era." Thesis, 1993. http://hdl.handle.net/10388/etd-01182007-131938.

Full text
Abstract:
The 1992 Charlottetown Accord attempted to constitutionalize the inherent Aboriginal right of self-government. The Accord was the result of a long series of public consultations and intense political negotiations which resulted in a document that was rejected by a majority of Canadians. The Aboriginal government provisions of the 1992 Charlottetown Accord do not represent the majority of essential elements for Aboriginal peoples to recognize and implement the inherent right of self-government. However, the Accord represents a major change in thinking for the federal and provincial governments
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Charlottetown Accord"

1

Sutherland, Kate. Referendum round-table: Perspectives on the Charlottetown Accord. Centre for Constitutional Studies = Centre d'études constitutionnelles, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Constitution, Canada. Draft legal text: Charlottetown Accord of August 28, 1992. Government of Canada, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Women, National Action Committee on the Status of. NAC response to the federal constitutional proposals [in the Charlottetown Accord]. National Action Committee on the Status of Women, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Dunsmuir, Mollie. Constitutional activity from patriation to Charlottetown (1980-1992). Library of Parliament, Research Branch, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Dunsmuir, Mollie. Activité au plan constitutionnel: Du rapatriement de la Constitution à l'Accord de Charlottetown (1980-1992). Bibliothèque du Parlement, Service de recherche, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Charlottetown accord: Draft legal text. 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Canada, Canada, Alberta, and Canada, eds. Charlottetown Accord: Draft legal text. Queen's Printer, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Charlottetown Accord: Consensus report on the Constitution, Charlottetown, August 28, 1992, final text. 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Kenneth, McRoberts, Monahan Patrick, York University (Toronto, Ont.). Centre for Public Law and Public Policy., Robarts Centre for Canadian Studies., Osgoode Hall Law School, and Constitution: Year of Decision (1992 : York University, Toronto, Ont.), eds. The Charlottetown Accord, the referendum, and the future of Canada. University of Toronto Press, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

McRoberts, Kenneth, and Patrick J. Monahan, eds. The Charlottetown Accord, the Referendum, and the Future of Canada. University of Toronto Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781487577681.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Charlottetown Accord"

1

Beaudoin, Gérald-A. "4. The Charlottetown Accord and Central Institutions." In The Charlottetown Accord, the Referendum, and the Future of Canada, edited by Kenneth McRoberts and Patrick J. Monahan. University of Toronto Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781487577681-006.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Lougheed, Peter. "13. The Charlottetown Accord: A Canadian Compromise." In The Charlottetown Accord, the Referendum, and the Future of Canada, edited by Kenneth McRoberts and Patrick J. Monahan. University of Toronto Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781487577681-015.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Elton, David. "2. The Charlottetown Accord Senate: Effective or Emasculated?" In The Charlottetown Accord, the Referendum, and the Future of Canada, edited by Kenneth McRoberts and Patrick J. Monahan. University of Toronto Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781487577681-004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hogg, Peter W. "5. Division of Powers in the Charlottetown Accord." In The Charlottetown Accord, the Referendum, and the Future of Canada, edited by Kenneth McRoberts and Patrick J. Monahan. University of Toronto Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781487577681-007.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Rebick, Judy. "7. The Charlottetown Accord: A Faulty Framework and a Wrong-headed Compromise." In The Charlottetown Accord, the Referendum, and the Future of Canada, edited by Kenneth McRoberts and Patrick J. Monahan. University of Toronto Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781487577681-009.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Turpel, Mary Ellen. "9. The Charlottetown Discord and Aboriginal Peoples' Struggle for Fundamental Political Change." In The Charlottetown Accord, the Referendum, and the Future of Canada, edited by Kenneth McRoberts and Patrick J. Monahan. University of Toronto Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781487577681-011.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Mcroberts, Kenneth, and Patrick J. Monahan. "Preface." In The Charlottetown Accord, the Referendum, and the Future of Canada, edited by Kenneth McRoberts and Patrick J. Monahan. University of Toronto Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781487577681-001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Mcrobert, Kenneth, and Patrick J. Monahan. "Introduction." In The Charlottetown Accord, the Referendum, and the Future of Canada, edited by Kenneth McRoberts and Patrick J. Monahan. University of Toronto Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781487577681-002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Watts, Ronald L. "1. The Reform of Federal Institutions." In The Charlottetown Accord, the Referendum, and the Future of Canada, edited by Kenneth McRoberts and Patrick J. Monahan. University of Toronto Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781487577681-003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Day, Shelagh. "3. Speaking for Ourselves." In The Charlottetown Accord, the Referendum, and the Future of Canada, edited by Kenneth McRoberts and Patrick J. Monahan. University of Toronto Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781487577681-005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!