Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Chinch-bugs – Control / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Chinch-bugs – Control.

Journal articles on the topic 'Chinch-bugs – Control'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 9 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 26 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Chinch-bugs – Control.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Smitley, D. R., and T. W. Davis. "Chinch Bug Control, Ingham Co., Mi, 1993." Arthropod Management Tests 19, no. 1 (January 1, 1994): 340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/19.1.340.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract A grid of 4 ft by 4 ft plots separated by 1 ft wide buffer strips was established on a home lawn with an infestation of chinch bugs in Okemos, MI. On 23 Jul precounts were made by observing each 4 ft by 4 ft plot for a 2 min period, all larvae and adults were counted. The chinch bugs were determined to be in the 2nd to 5th instar at the time of the pre-spray sample and application. The treatments were grouped into blocks based on these counts. Six replications of each treatment were treated between 10:00 am and 12:00 pm on 23 Jul. Each 16 ft2 plot was considered a replicate. Granular products were evenly applied over the plot with hand-held shakers. Liquid products were applied with a single nozzle, hand-held CO2 sprayer from R&D Sprayers. Applications were made at 50 psi through an 8003 flat fan nozzle for 12 sec (175 gal/acre). The postcounts were made on 30 Jul in all plots. Each plot was observed for 6 min.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Heng-Moss, T. M., F. P. Baxendale, and K. A. Weinhold. "Insecticidal Control of Chinch Bugs on Buffalograss, 1996." Arthropod Management Tests 22, no. 1 (January 1, 1997): 372–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/22.1.372a.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Andon, Jennifer, and David J. Shetlar. "Curative Control of Hairy Chinch Bugs in Lawn Turf, 2013: Table 1." Arthropod Management Tests 40, no. 1 (December 2015): G1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/tsv177.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Baxendale, F. P., A. P. Weinhold, and T. P. Riordan. "Control of Buffalograss Chinch Bugs with Beauvarja Bassiana and Entomopathogenic Nematodes, 1993." Arthropod Management Tests 19, no. 1 (January 1, 1994): 328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/19.1.328.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract The study was conducted on a buffalograss lawn in Lincoln, NE. The turf was maintained at a mowing height of 3.5 inches and thatch accumulation in the plot area was 0.25 inches. Field conditions at the time of application were: soil type, silty clay loam; soil organic matter, 3-5%; soil pH, 6-7; water pH, 7.0; soil moisture, near field capacity. Plots were 4 × 4 ft and the experimental design was a RCB with 3 replications’. Insecticide treatments were applied 2 Sep. Prior to application, the plot area was mowed to 1.5 inches. Treatments were applied with a CO2 sprayer using a LF-4 tip at 24 psi and delivering 5 gal finished spray/1000 ft2. Immediately following application, plots were syringed with 0.25 inches water. A total of 0.29 and 0.68 inches of rain fell respectively, during the 7 and 14 day post-treatment periods. Product efficacy was evaluated 9 and 16 Sep (7 and 14 DAT) by removing from each plot three turf-soil cores to a depth of 1 inch with a 4.25-inch diam cup cutter (0.3 ft2 total area per plot). Cores were returned to the laboratory and placed in Berlese funnels. Extracted chinch bugs were counted after 48 hr.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Bender, David A., and William P. Morrison. "INDIAN MUSTARD AS A TRAP CROP FOR INSECT PESTS OF CABBAGE ON THE TEXAS HIGH PLAINS." HortScience 28, no. 4 (April 1993): 268B—268. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.28.4.268b.

Full text

Abstract:

Indian mustard trap crops have successfully reduced pesticide use on commercial cabbage in India. Diamondback moth has been a serious pest of cabbage in Texas and has demonstrated resistance to most classes of insecticides. Use of a trap crop could fit well in an integrated management program for cabbage insects, Three-row plots of spring and fall cabbage were surrounded by successive single-row plantings of Indian mustard in trials at Lubbock, Texas to determine the efficacy of interplanting for reducing insecticide applications. Insects in the cabbage and Indian mustard were counted twice weekly, and insecticides were applied selectively when economic thresholds were reached. Indian mustard was highly attractive to harlequin bugs, and protected intercropped spring cabbage. Cabbage plots without mustard required two insecticide applications to control the infestation. False chinch bugs were also highly attracted to Indian mustard. Lepidopterous larvae, including diamondback moth, did not appear to be attracted to the trap crop. Indian mustard trap crops reduced insecticide applications to spring cabbage but had no positive effect on fail cabbage.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Baxendale, F. P., J. A. Kalisch, and D. H. Steinegger. "Control of Buffalograss Chinch Bugs with Combinations of Insecticidal Soap and Reduced Rates of Conventional Insecticides, 1993." Arthropod Management Tests 19, no. 1 (January 1, 1994): 328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/19.1.328a.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract The study was conducted on a buffalograss lawn in Lincoln, NE. The turf was maintained at a mowing height of 3.5 inches and thatch accumulation in the plot area was 0.25 inches. Field conditions at the time of application were: soil type, silty clay loam; soil organic matter, 3-5%; soil pH, 6-7; water pH, 7.0; soil moisture, near field capacity. Plots were 4 × 4 ft and the experimental design was a RCB with 4 replications. Insecticide treatments were applied 3 Sep. Prior to application, the plot area was mowed to 1.5 inches. Treatments were applied with a CO2 sprayer using a LF-4 tip at 24 psi and delivering 5 gal finished spray/1000 ft2. Immediately following application, plots were syringed with 0.25 inches water. Product efficacy was evaluated 8 Sep (5 DAT) by removing from each plot three turf-soil cores to a depth of 1 inch with a 4.25-inch diam cup cutter (0.3 ft2 total area per plot). Cores were returned to the laboratory and placed in Berlese funnels. After 48 hr extracted chinch bugs were counted.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Fife, J. H., B. R. Leonard, K. D. Torrey, T. J. Riley, and B. A. Castro. "Chinch Bug Management with Foliar Insecticides in Field Corn, 1997." Arthropod Management Tests 23, no. 1 (January 1, 1998): 195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/23.1.195.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract The efficacy of selected insecticide treatments was compared with that of an untreated control at the Macon Ridge location of the Northeast Research Station near Winnsboro, LA. Corn seed was planted in a Gigger silt loam (pH = 6.1, 1.1% organic matter) on 27 Mar in 2-row plots (40 inch centers) X 40 ft. Treatments were arranged in a RCB design with four replications. Treatments were applied with a handboom and a CO2-charged delivery system calibrated to deliver 10 gpa through 8002 flat-fan nozzles (2/row) at 28 psi. Insecticides were applied on 14 May to V5 stage corn plants. Ten plants/plot were randomly chosen for sampling on 16 and 20 May. Total numbers of chinch bugs were recorded by visually examining mainstems of the plant and leaf sheaths. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and means were separated according to DMRT. Rainfall did not influence the results of this test.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Samuels, Richard Ian, and Déborah Lucienne Araújo Coracini. "Selection of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae isolates for the control of Blissus antillus (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae)." Scientia Agricola 61, no. 3 (June 2004): 271–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0103-90162004000300005.

Full text

Abstract:

Chinch bugs of the genus Blissus (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) are serious pests of maize, wheat, sorghum and various grasses. This study is the first to screen isolates of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae against 4th instar and adult Blissus antillus aiming to develop a biological control program for this important pasture pest. Ten fungal isolates were initially screened and three isolates were chosen for further investigation. To determine virulence, insects were inoculated by immersion in concentrations of 5 ´ 10(8) conidia mL-1. Mortality was evaluated for 10 days. B. bassiana ARSEF 792 was the most virulent isolate to both nymphs and adults, causing 53 and 78% infection, respectively, and values for LT50 of 7.8 and 5.0 days, respectively. Germination studies were carried out to confirm viability and determine speed of germination as a pathogenicity factor. The production of conidia on the cadavers of insects infected with the three selected isolates was determined. The production of conidia on rice media was also evaluated. B. bassiana CG 24 produced the highest number of conidia on insects cadavers (14.9 ´ 10(7) conidia per insect) and also on rice media (10.6 ´ 10(9) conidia per g).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Castro, B. A., T. J. Riley, and B. R. Leonard. "Evaluation of Selected Hopper Box and Seed Treatments for Control of Red Imported Fire Ant in Grain Sorghum, 1994." Arthropod Management Tests 20, no. 1 (January 1, 1995): 231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/20.1.231a.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract The efficacy of selected insecticide treatments applied as in-furrow granules at planting (IFGAP), T-banded granules (TBAND) and seed treatments (SEEDT) was evaluated for control of the RIFA at the Macon Ridge Branch of the Northeast Research Station in Franklin Parish, LA. The test was planted no till with a John Deere 7300 planter into a bermuda grass sod containing a high density of RIFA mounds. Plots consisting of 4 rows (40 inch centers) by 30 ft were planted on 3 May in a RCB with 4 replications. RIFA no. were estimated on 1 Jun by placing an unruled index card (3X5 inches) baited with peanut butter in each plot and recording the no. of ants attracted after 3 h. No. of chinch bugs were obtained on 15 Jun by counting the no. per 20 plants in the 2 center rows. Plant stand densities were recorded on 31 May by sampling the entire 2 center rows in each plot. Plant heights were estimated on 31 May by measuring 20 plants in each plot. Intra-row plant skips were recorded on 13 Jun by counting the no. of skips > 12 inches per plot.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Torrey, K. D., T. J. Riley, and B. R. Leonard. "Corn Insect Pest Management with Selected Rates of Lorsban, 1994." Arthropod Management Tests 20, no. 1 (January 1, 1995): 180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/20.1.180.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract The insecticidal efficacy, effect on plant growth and corn seed yields of selected treatments applied as in-furrow sprays at planting (IFSAP) and in-furrow granules at planting (IFGAP) were compared to that of an untreated control. Native winter vegetation was allowed to cover the test area. An application of Gramoxone X-tra (1.5 pt/acre) was applied 2 wk pre-plant to terminate all vegetation. All plots also received atrazine 4L (3.0 pt/acre) + Roundup D-pack (3.0 pt/acre) at planting. Plots consisted of 4 rows (40 inch centers) × 45 ft. Treatments were arranged in a RCBD with 3 replications. Corn was planted no-till in a Gigger silt loam (pH = 5.9, 1.1% organic matter) on 30 Mar with a John Deere 7300 planter modified to apply treatments through a granular applicator hopper box or as a directed spray into the seed furrow. IFSAP treatments for Lorsban were applied with a CO2-charged system calibrated to deliver 5 gal total spray/acre through 8002E flat fan nozzles (1/row) at 40 psi. Numbers of chinch bugs were recorded on 2 May by sampling 20 plants in each plot. Cutworm damage to plants was determined by recording all damaged plants on the center 2 rows of each plot weekly for 3 wk after plant emergence to obtain a cumulative summary. Plant stand density was measured on 16 May by sampling the entire 2 center rows of each plot. Plant height was determined on 19 May by taking an average of 20 plants/plot. Yields were measured by harvesting the 2 center rows of each plot on 16 Aug. The entire test was furrow irrigated throughout the season and rainfall was not a factor influencing final yields.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Torrey, K. D., T. J. Riley, and B. R. Leonard. "Corn Insect Pest Management with Selected Rates of Furadan 4F, 1994." Arthropod Management Tests 20, no. 1 (January 1, 1995): 181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/20.1.181.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract The insecticidal efficacy, effect on plant growth and corn seed yields of selected treatments applied as in-furrow sprays at planting (IFSAP), and in-furrow granules at planting (IFGAP) were compared to that of an untreated control. Native winter vegetation was allowed to cover the test area. An application of Gramoxone X-tra (1.5 pt/acre) was applied 2 wk pre-plant to terminate all vegetation. All plots also received atrazine 4L (3.0 pt/acre) + Roundup D-pak (3.0 pt/acre) at planting. Plots consisted of 4 rows (40 inch centers) × 45 ft. Treatments were arranged in a RCBD with 4 replications. Corn was planted no-till in a Gigger silt loam (pH = 5.9 1.1% organic matter) on 23 Mar with a John Deere 7300 planter modified to apply treatments through a granular applicator hopper box or as a directed spray into the seed furrow. IFSAP treatments for Furadan 4F were applied with a CO2 charged system calibrated to deliver 5 gal total spray/acre through 8002E flat fan nozzles (1/row) at 40 psi. Numbers of chinch bugs were recorded on 22 Apr and 2 May by sampling 20 plants in each plot. Armyworm damage to plants was determined by recording all damaged plants on the center 2 rows of each plot 2 wk after plant emergence. Plant stand density was measured on 16 May by sampling the entire 2 center rows of each plot. Plant height was determined on 23 May by taking an average of 20 plants/plot. Yields were measured by harvesting the 2 center rows of each plot on 26 Aug. The entire test was furrow irrigated throughout the season and rainfall was not a factor influencing final yields.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Heng-Moss, T. M., S. K. Schaeffer, R. D. Sitz, and M. D. Stamm. "ALOFT FOR CONTROL OF CHINCH BUGS, 2008." Arthropod Management Tests 34, no. 1 (January 1, 2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.4182/amt.2009.g28.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Buss, Eileen A., Brianna Whitman, and Adam G. Dale. "Managing Southern Chinch Bug in Warm Season Turfgrasses." EDIS 2018, no. 3 (June 27, 2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.32473/edis-lh036-2018.

Full text

Abstract:

Southern chinch bug, Blissus isularis Barber, is the most damaging insect pest of St. Augustinegrass in the United States. St. Augustinegrass is the most common turfgrass used in Florida. The ubiquity of this single turfgrass species makes southern chinch bug an economically important pest in the state. In fact, chinch bugs cost Florida homeowners and professionals millions of dollars every year. This 7-page fact sheet written by Eileen A. Buss, Brianna M. Whitman, and Adam G. Dale and published by the UF/IFAS Department of Entomology and Nematology describes the biology of the pest and the damage it causes and lists ways to scout and monitor for chinch bugs and some strategies for control of the pest.https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/lh036

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Stamm, M. D., J. A. Hays, and T. M. Heng-Moss. "ALOFT FORMULATIONS FOR CONTROL OF CHINCH BUGS, 2007." Arthropod Management Tests 33, no. 1 (January 1, 2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/33.1.g46.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Eickhoff, T. E., R. W. Baxendale, L. Toda, and F. P. Baxendale. "RESIDUAL CONTROL OF CHINCH BUGS WITH ALLECTUS INSECTICIDE, 2005." Arthropod Management Tests 31, no. 1 (January 1, 2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/31.1.g13.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Heng-Moss, T. M., C. M. Ramm, M. D. Stamm, and R. A. Fithian. "EFFICACY OF NEW FORMULATIONS FOR CONTROL OF CHINCH BUGS, 2009." Arthropod Management Tests 35, no. 1 (January 1, 2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.4182/amt.2010.g15.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Andon, Jennifer, and David J. Shetlar. "CURATIVE CONTROL OF HAIRY CHINCH BUGS IN LAWN TURF, 2012." Arthropod Management Tests 38, no. 1 (January 1, 2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.4182/amt.2013.g7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Heng-Moss, T. M., T. E. Eickhoff, W. G. Anderson, and F. P. Baxendale. "SELECTED RATES OF PYRETHROID INSECTICIDES FOR CONTROL OF CHINCH BUGS, 2003." Arthropod Management Tests 29, no. 1 (January 1, 2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/29.1.g22.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Anderson, W. G., T. E. Eickhoff, and T. M. Heng-Moss. "EVALUATION OF ARENA FOR CONTROL OF FIRST GENERATION CHINCH BUGS, 2004." Arthropod Management Tests 30, no. 1 (January 1, 2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/30.1.g21.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Anderson, W. G., J. D. Carstens, and F. P. Baxendale. "PREVENTIVE CONTROL OF FIRST/SECOND GENERATION CHINCH BUGS WITH BIFENTHRIN FORMULATIONS, 2002." Arthropod Management Tests 28, no. 1 (January 1, 2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/28.1.g17.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Wasem, C. M., M. D. Stamm, and T. M. Heng-Moss. "RESIDUAL CONTROL OF CHINCH BUGS WITH SELECTED PYRETHROIDS ON FERTILIZER CARRIERS, 2006." Arthropod Management Tests 32, no. 1 (January 1, 2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/32.1.g32.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Carstens, J. D., T. E. Huntington, and F. P. Baxendale. "CONTROL OF SECOND GENERATION CHINCH BUGS WITH EXPERIMENTAL FORMULATIONS OF ZETA-CYPERMETHRIN, 2002." Arthropod Management Tests 28, no. 1 (January 1, 2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/28.1.g18.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Cook, D. R., K. Emfinger, and B. R. Leonard. "EVALUATION OF SELECTED SEED TREATMENTS FOR CONTROL OF CHINCH BUGS ON FIELD CORN, 2003." Arthropod Management Tests 29, no. 1 (January 1, 2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/29.1.f23.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Cook, D. R., R. H. Gable, and B. R. Leonard. "EVALUATION OF SELECTED AT-PLANTING INSECTICIDES FOR CONTROL OF CHINCH BUGS ON FIELD CORN, 2003." Arthropod Management Tests 29, no. 1 (January 1, 2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/29.1.f22.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Benda, Nicole, and Adam G. Dale. "Managing Insecticide and Miticide Resistance in Florida Landscapes." EDIS 2018, no. 4 (August 30, 2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.32473/edis-in714-2018.

Full text

Abstract:

Resistance to insecticide or miticide is a worry for landscape managers. Around the world, chinch bugs, leafminers, and other insect and mite pests have become resistant to dozens of insecticides, but with diligent insecticide resistance management, we can still maintain long-term effective chemical control. With few new modes of action coming onto the market, landscape managers need to be good stewards of existing products. Ultimately, resistance management means reducing exposure of pests to any one pesticide. Fortunately, there are many ways to prevent resistance and still control pests of ornamental plants and lawns, and this 6-page fact sheet written by Nicole Benda and Adam Dale and published by the UF/IFAS Entomology and Nematology Department explains how. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/in714

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Mize, Terry, Jeff Stuart, and R. Jeffery Whitworth. "Insecticides Applied at Planting Time or as Foliar Sprays to Control Chinch Bugs on Grain Sorghum." Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports, no. 12 (January 1, 1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.4148/2378-5977.7303.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!