Academic literature on the topic 'Chomsky's Government and Binding theory'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Chomsky's Government and Binding theory.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Chomsky's Government and Binding theory"

1

RAGER, JOHN, and GEORGE BERG. "A Connectionist Model of Motion and Government in Chomsky's Government-binding Theory." Connection Science 2, no. 1-2 (January 1990): 35–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540099008915661.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Harsono, Y. M. "Chomsky's Universal Grammar: A Case of Its Concepts of Government/Binding Theory." TEFLIN Journal - A publication on the teaching and learning of English 12, no. 2 (September 3, 2015): 210. http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v12i2/210-222.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of this paper is to see the universality of the Government/Binding Theory in its concepts of government, the pro-drop parameter, and binding theory. Three languages English, Indonesian, and Javanese are analyzed based on the three concepts. From the analysis it is concluded that in some cases language is universal, but in some other cases every language is specific.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Shapiro, Lewis P. "Tutorial." Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40, no. 2 (April 1997): 254–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4002.254.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper is intended as an introduction to syntax. Borrowing from Chomsky's Government & Binding and Principles & Parameters frameworks (Chomsky, 1986, 1992, 1995), various aspects of syntactic theory are described. These include lexical, functional, and phrasal categories and how they are put together into clauses and sentences, how words are represented in the mental lexicon, how lexical properties project to the syntax, and how noun phrases are assigned structural and semantic information. Additionally, how sentences that are not canonically ordered are derived and represented, how and to what do pronouns refer, and the principles that connect all these theoretical notions to form knowledge of language are described. The paper concludes with a summary of work in normal and disordered language, including treatment of language disorders, that has exploited aspects of the syntactic theory described in this paper.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Philippaki-Warburton, Irene. "The theory of empty categories and the pro-drop parameter in Modern Greek." Journal of Linguistics 23, no. 2 (September 1987): 289–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700011282.

Full text
Abstract:
One of the most promising new developments of recent research into theoretical syntax within the model of Government and Binding (GB) as presented in Chomsky (1981) and (1982) has been the new importance given to the study of languages other than English. This has stimulated a great deal of work into a variety of languages (see, for example, Rizzi, 1982; Borer, 1983; Bouchard, 1984; Huang, 1984 and others). It has also been welcomed by linguists outside the TG tradition. Thus, Comrie, (1984:155) expresses his delight that ‘Chomsky (1981) makes clear that generative grammarians have come to realize that an adequate study of syntax within universal grammar requires the study of languages of different types. Chomsky's main concern has always been to formulate a theory that would achieve ‘explanatory adequacy’ by providing a restrictive set of principles which could characterize universally the notion ‘natural language’. However, detailed and in-depth analyses of various languages have revealed that in order to achieve ‘descriptive adequacy’ the theory has to allow for cross-linguistic differences, or ‘parametric variation’. The concept of parametric variation weakens some-what the restrictiveness of the universal grammar (UG) hypothesis and even more so its purported innateness, since the values for the parameters must be arrived at by the child through induction from empirical evidence. Nevertheless, explanatory adequacy may still be attained if the number of parameters is very small and each parameter has few values.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Levin, Beth, and Grace Song. "Making Sense of Corpus Data." International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 2, no. 1 (January 1, 1997): 23–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.2.1.04lev.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper demonstrates the essential role of corpus data in the development of a theory that explains and predicts word behavior. We make this point through a case study of verbs of sound, drawing our evidence primarily from the British National Corpus. We begin by considering pretheoretic notions of the verbs of sound as presented in corpus-based dictionaries and then contrast them with the predictions made by a theory of syntax, as represented by Chomsky's Government-Binding framework. We identify and classify the transitive uses of sixteen representative verbs of sound found in the corpus data. Finally, we consider what a linguistic account with both syntactic and lexical semantic components has to offer as an explanation of observed differences in the behavior of the sample verbs.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Huang, Yan. "A neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora." Journal of Linguistics 27, no. 2 (September 1991): 301–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700012706.

Full text
Abstract:
Anaphora clearly involves syntactic, semantic and pragmatic factors. Although it is generally acknowledged that pragmatic factors are predominant in discourse anaphora, it is equally widely held (especially among Government-Binding (GB) theorists) that only syntactic and semantic factors are crucial to intrasentential anaphora. In this article, I shall argue, in the spirit of an ongoing debate about the ‘division of labour’ between grammar and pragmatics regarding anaphora (Reinhart, 1983a, b, 1986; Kempson, 1984a, b, 1988a, b; Levinson, 1987a, b, 1991; Yan Huang, 1987a, 1989), that contrary to this popular but erroneous view, the contribution of pragmatics to anaphora is much more fundamental than has been commonly believed, even at the heart of intrasentential anaphora, at least with respect to languages like Chinese. Such a position, if established, would seem to decrease the plausibility of Chomsky's (1981, 1982, 1986) claim that anaphora, and zero anaphora in particular, have a privileged access to the alleged underlying principles of the innate Universal Grammar (UG), the biologically determined endowment of the human mind.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Burzio, Luigi. "English stress, vowel length and modularity." Journal of Linguistics 29, no. 2 (September 1993): 359–418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700000360.

Full text
Abstract:
The evolution of phonological theory over the past fifteen years or so mirrors in important respects that of syntactic theory. The common evolutionary characteristic is the emergence of modularity. As is frequently noted following Chomsky (1986: ch. 3), in syntax, rich systems of rules have been supplanted by a relatively small number of discrete sub-theories, such as the theories of thematic relations, Case, Binding, Government, and the theory of empty categories. Characteristically, each sub-theory regulates one specific aspect of syntactic structure, at one or more levels of representation, for example the distribution of overt noun phrases at S-structure. The emergence of the sub-theories reflects a natural shift in investigative focus. Just as studying the facts of language from a systematic and formal perspective led to the discovery of generalizations of fact, originally expressed as ‘rules’, so the study of the rules themselves led to the discovery of higher-order generalizations, expressed by the various conditions or principles that make up the contemporary sub-theories. Although Chomsky (1986:70ff.) lists several important contributors to the development of the new perspective, in the mind of most syntacticians, a watershed event in this evolution was Chomsky's own ‘Conditions on transformations’ (1973). To the extent that this development of syntactic theory is a natural one towards deeper understanding, a comparable one is expected in phonological theory. Although the ‘modularity’ of phonology is less frequently noted and identification of a single watershed event is perhaps more difficult, there are clearly several ‘modules’ or sub-theories that have emerged in post-SPEhistory – three in particular.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Haegeman, Liliane. "Scope phenomena in English and Dutch and L2 acquisition: A Case Study." Interlanguage studies bulletin (Utrecht) 1, no. 2 (December 1985): 118–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026765838500100202.

Full text
Abstract:
The aim of this paper is to examine how a revised contrastive analysis, based on Chomsky's Government Binding Theory, can be a contribution to L2 acquisition research. The paper illustrates in detail how a contrastive approach in terms of parametric variation between languages may explain persistent errors made by Dutch learners of English. Three parameters are considered: the COMP-INFL parameter, the presence of absence of reanalysis in the VP and the categorial status of modals. These three interact in three related areas of English grammar: i) do-insertion, ii) scope of negation, and iii) modal scope (especially as regards conditionals). It is argued that errors made by Dutch learners in these areas of English grammar are due to an inadequate ‘resetting’ of the parameters involved. A prominent feature of L2 parameter setting seems to be the doubling strategy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Jacobsen, Bent. "(Tomme) NPer i moderne generativ syntaktisk teori (1. del)." HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business 1, no. 1 (July 17, 2015): 153. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v1i1.21338.

Full text
Abstract:
The present paper takes its point of departure in the concept of empty NP-categories, as this is embodied in a more comprehensive theory of NPs. The theoretical framework adopted is mainly that expouned in Chomsky: Lextures on Government and Binding (1981) and subsequent works (though no attempt has been made to incorporate the revised model presented in Chomsky: Barriers (1986)). The paper gives a brief introduction to the main modules of a modern generative grammar (X-bar syntax;0-theory; government (including proper government and the Extended Empty Category Principle); the theory of abstract Case; the theory of Binding; and the theory of Bouding). The paper falls into two parts. In the first part the basic modules and principles are introduced. In the second part, to be published in the next issue of Hermes, it will be shown how these modules interact in the derivation of sentences. Particular attention will be paid to NP-Movement and Wh-Movement. A separate section will deal with the status of PRO. The full bibliography appears after both parts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Jacobsen, Bent. "(Tomme) NPer i moderne generativ syntaktisk teori (2. del)." HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business 1, no. 2 (July 17, 2015): 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v1i2.21352.

Full text
Abstract:
The present paper takes its point of departure in the concept of empty NP-categories, as this is embodied in a more comprehensive theory of NPs. The theoretical framework adopted is mainly that expouned in Chomsky: Lextures on Government and Binding (1981) and subsequent works (though no attempt has been made to incorporate the revised model presented in Chomsky: Barriers (1986)). The paper gives a brief introduction to the main modules of a modern generative grammar (X-bar syntax;0-theory; government (including proper government and the Extended Empty Category Principle); the theory of abstract Case; the theory of Binding; and the theory of Bouding). The paper falls into two parts. In the first part the basic modules and principles are introduced. In the second part, to be published in the next issue of Hermes, it will be shown how these modules interact in the derivation of sentences. Particular attention will be paid to NP-Movement and Wh-Movement. A separate section will deal with the status of PRO. The full bibliography appears after both parts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Chomsky's Government and Binding theory"

1

Macias, Benjamin. "An incremental parser for government-binding theory." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1991. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/251511.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Vinger, Gift. "THE STATUS OF THE PROJECTION PRINCIPLE IN GOVERNMENT-BINDING THEORY." Journal for New Generation Sciences, Vol 6, Issue 2: Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/11462/509.

Full text
Abstract:
Published Article
The role of the Projection Principle within Chomsky's Government-Binding (GB) Theory is to preserve the subcategorisation properties of lexical items at all levels of syntactic representation, viz. D-structure, S-structure, and Lexical Form. Arguments have been made that the Projection Principle is a new concept that is simply an extension of theTransformational Component (XFM) and Emonds' Structure-Preserving Constraint (SPC), and that it does not deserve the high status it has been accorded in GB theory. This paper provides evidence, based on sentences involving movement operations, that the Projection Principle is innovative and that it convincingly addresses what theXFMandSPChave failed to address.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Gamon, Michael. "The derivational formation of chain-links : minimalism and binding theory /." Thesis, Connect to this title online; UW restricted, 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/8416.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Nakamura, Masanori 1966. "Move a, scope, and relativized minimality." Thesis, McGill University, 1992. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=56651.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis deals with two aspects of operators within the framework of Government and Binding theory; (i) how they are assigned their scope, and (ii) how they are licensed. In an attempt to answer these questions, the relation of Move $ alpha$ (such as scrambling, NP-movement, and wh-movement) to the scope of operators and the licensing of wh-elements, negative polarity items, and adverbs are examined. It is argued that scope assignment is dictated by the Scope Principle and the Empty Category Principle. It is also argued that licensing of operators is determined by the Feature-Dependent Item Criterion. These principles and criterion make use of the concept of Government Theory Compatibility, which is built into Relativized Minimality. It is suggested that this concept should be characterized in terms of a set of lexical features. The approach advocated here accounts for the interpretive and distributional behavior of operators without recourse to parameterization of LF principles.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ferreira, Ivana Kátia de Souza. "Os verbos inacusativos e a inversão do sujeito em sentenças declarativas do português brasileiro." Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10923/4037.

Full text
Abstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2013-08-07T19:00:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 000430796-Texto+Completo-0.pdf: 770372 bytes, checksum: 668d148b88225f039bfd7491ca949fea (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011
This academic work deals with the unaccusative verbs and the free inversion of the subject in declarative sentences in Brazilian Portuguese (BP). This study is based on a bibliographic review, in the light of the Generative Syntax, under the Government-Binding (GB) Theory. It is proposed by Chomsky (1981), in accordance with the Principles and Parameters model. Firstly, a summary of the fundamental topics (Lexicon, Verb Subcategorization, Case Theory, θ-Theory, Argument Structure) within the GB is made, not to mention that these topics are absolutely related to the main subject. Thereafter, the unaccusative verbs (monoargumental) and their particularity are presented. A comparison is made between the unaccusative and the inergative verbs. Although they are both monoargumental verbs, they have different syntactic structures from each other. Their Dstructures show such differences.The unaccusative verbs subcategorize a Determiner Phrase (DP) complement (in the object place), while the inergative ones select an external argument. When the inversion of the DP subject occurs, it remains in its original position within the Verb Phrase (VP). According to relevant authors (Pontes, 1986; Kato, 2000; Menuzzi, 2003) to this work, the unaccusative verbs are compatible with the V(erb)S(ubject) order in BP. The occurance of two kinds of agreement is verified in the sentences when the DP subject occupies the post-verbal position. When the verb agrees with the post-verbal DP subject ([pro] Chegaram as visitas), the agreement results from a chain between the post-verbal DP subject and the null expletive pro. When the verb remains in the 3rd person of singular ([pro] Chegou as visitas), it reveals that the agreement is with the pre-verbal null expletive pro, singular according to Mioto et al. (2007). The agreement with the pre-verbal expletive is likewise in French. However in French the pre-verbal expletive is not null; it is the lexical one il.
Este trabalho trata sobre os verbos inacusativos e a livre inversão do sujeito em sentenças declarativas do português brasileiro (PB). É um estudo, com base em revisão bibliográfica, à luz da Sintaxe Gerativa, sob a perspectiva da Teoria da Regência e da Ligação (TRL), proposta por Chomsky (1981), em conformidade com o modelo Princípios e Parâmetros. Primeiramente, é feito um apanhado de tópicos fundamentais (Léxico, Subcategorização Verbal, Teoria do Caso, Teoria Theta, Estrutura de Argumentos) para a TRL, bem como relacionados ao assunto a ser discutido. Após essa exposição, são apresentados os verbos inacusativos (monoargumentais) e as suas especificidades. É feita uma comparação entre os verbos inacusativos e os inergativos, tendo em vista serem ambos monoargumentais. Apesar disso, apresentam estruturas sintáticas completamente distintas. Suas estruturas-D mostram tais diferenças. Os inacusativos subcategorizam um Determiner Phrase (DP) complemento (posição de objeto).Os inergativos selecionam somente argumento externo. Quando ocorre a inversão do DP sujeito, este permanece em sua posição de base, dentro do V(erb)P(hrase). De acordo com autores relevantes (Pontes, 1986; Kato, 2000; Menuzzi, 2003) para este trabalho, os verbos inacusativos são compatíveis com a ordem V(erbo)S(ujeito) no PB. Nas sentenças VS com inacusativos, são verificadas duas possibilidades de concordância. Quando o verbo concorda com o DP sujeito pós-verbal ([pro] Chegaram as visitas), a concordância resulta da cadeia entre o DP sujeito pós-verbal e o expletivo nulo pro pré-verbal. Quando o verbo permanece na 3ª pessoa do singular ([pro] Chegou as visitas), a concordância é realizada com o expletivo nulo pro pré-verbal, que, de acordo com Mioto et al. (2007), é singular. A concordância com o expletivo pré-verbal é como no francês, por exemplo. Porém, no francês, o expletivo pré-verbal não é nulo, é lexical (Il).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Kim, Kwang-Sup. "A theta binding approach to quantification in English." [Seoul, Korea] : Dept. of English, Graduate School, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, 1990. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/26153714.html.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Motaung, Patric Serame. "Control in infinitives in Sesotho." University of the Western Cape, 1991. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/8202.

Full text
Abstract:
Magister Artium - MA
The purpose of this study is to investigate how subject PRO of the infinitive in Sesotho is assigned an antecedent The general framework which is assumed is the Government Binding theory of generative grammar, in particular one of its subtheories, namely the Control theory which is concerned with the assignment of an antecedent to the subject PRO in the infinitive. A survey of the work done by various linguists on the Infinitive in Bantu languages shows that much has been written on the properties of the infinitive. In the Nguni languages, especially in Xhosa, considerable research has been done to establish the syntactic nature of the infinitive in the various constructions that it may occur. The Infinitive in Sesotho has, however, not been studied extensively. The central issue of this study relates to establishing the antecedent of the subject PRO of the infinitive in the various constructions in which it may appear. It is demonstrated that in some instances it is possible for two different NP arguments in a sentence to serve as a possible antecedent of the empty category PRO. This examination of control of the subject PRO in the infinitive in Sesotho has revealed the following: The subject PRO in the infinitive must have antecedent. In such cases the empty category PRO which is obligatory control is considered to behave like an anaphor, because as an empty of the clausal complement it must take its referential index from either the subject or object argument of the matrix sentence. This implies that the empty category PRO has no capacity for independent reference. 2. The subject PRO in the infinitive may have an In such cases the empty category PRO which is subject to non-obligatory control is considered to behave like a pronoun, because the empty category PRO may either refer to individuals independently or co-refer to individuals already named on a given sentence. Finally the subject PRO in the infinitive can at times have no antecedent at all In such cases the empty category PRO is subject to arbitrary control, because its antecedent may be implicit This has been established in the following instances: 3.1 There are cases where the infinitive is a complement of a Verb or a Copulative with the subject position occupied by an empty existential pronominal which is associated with the existential morpheme Ho. This pronominal is an empty category just like PRO, but is in a non-argument position, for it lacks a thetha-role. This is attributed to the fact that the existential pronominal associated with Ho, which signifies "it" or "there" is a dummy element and has therefore no semantic role. Therefore the antecedent of the subject PRO in the infinitive can be "anyone in general". The interpretation thereof is known as arbitrary control. It has also been established that, the Nominal infinitive, which has in Sesotho, like all other nominals, a class prefix which is morphologically marked with a prefix Ho, is subject to arbitrary control (see 3 above). This is attributed to the fact that its subject NP-argument has a non-referential expression which is thus ungoverned, because it has no agreement (-AGR) and can therefore not be assigned Case.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Tellier, Christine. "Universal licensing : implications for parasitic gap constructions." Thesis, McGill University, 1988. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=75902.

Full text
Abstract:
This dissertation investigates, within a Government-Binding framework, the licensing mechanisms which regulate the distribution of sentence-internal constituents. It is proposed that the licensing requirements apply across components, in the spirit of the Projection Principle of Chomsky (1981). Under the extended view of licensing proposed here ("Universal Licensing"), maximal projections must comply with the appropriate licensing requirements at every syntactic level of representation.
This allows for a more constrained model of grammar, under which a number of facts follow in a principled way; this is the case particularly with respect to constructions involving null operators. Thus, from the D- and S-Structure conditions on null operator licensing, we derive the cross-linguistic as well as the language-internal distribution of resumptive pronouns. Furthermore, some of the well-known, but so far stipulated, constraints on parasitic gap (PG) constructions are shown to follow from general principles: we explain for instance the fact that PGs must be sanctioned at S-Structure, as well as the inability of adjunct movement to license PGs.
The consequences of Universal Licensing on the distribution of PGs are examined with particular reference to adnominal PGs in French genitival relatives. It is shown that the properties displayed by these little-studied ("double dont") constructions, in conjunction with the Universal Licensing Principle, shed significant light on a number of issues, among which the thematic structure of nominals, and the nature of the locality constraints on null operator identification.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Fox, Daniel. "Scrambling and extraction constraints in Dari : GB and RRG analyses /." Amherst, Mass. : [s.n.], 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10009/301.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Salome, Margaret. "On the interaction between aspect and arbitrary null objects : evidence from Spanish /." Thesis, Connect to this title online; UW restricted, 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/8427.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Chomsky's Government and Binding theory"

1

Mark, Newson, ed. Chomsky's universal grammar: An introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford, OX, UK: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Chomsky's universal grammar: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Büring, Daniel. Binding theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Sinclair, Melinda. The rationality of Chomsky's linguistics as instantiated by the development of binding theory. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch, Department of General Linguistics, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Where does binding theory apply? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Haegeman, Liliane M. V. Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford, UK: B. Blackwell, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Introduction to government and binding theory. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: B. Blackwell, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Aspects of binding in Bulgarian. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Sadler, Louisa. Welsh syntax: A government-binding approach. London: Croom Helm, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Sadler, Louisa. Welsh syntax: A government-binding approach. London: Croom Helm, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Chomsky's Government and Binding theory"

1

Rager, John, and George Berg. "A Connectionist Model of Motion and Government on Chomsky’s Government-binding Theory." In Connectionist Natural Language Processing, 28–45. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2624-3_2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Klein, Wolfgang. "Government-binding." In Cross Currents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, 169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lald.2.11kle.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

De Geest, Wim, and Dany Jaspers. "1. Government and Binding Theory." In Linguistic Theory and Grammatical Description, 23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cilt.75.03deg.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Perez, Carolyn Harford. "14. The Shona Passive and Government-Binding Theory." In Publications in African Languages and Linguistics, edited by Gerrit J. Dimmendahl, 179–90. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110883350-015.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Lasnik, Howard. "On a Lexical Parameter in the Government-Binding Theory." In Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 163–71. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-6859-3_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Bienemann, Alexander, Klaus-Dieter Schewe, and Bernhard Thalheim. "Towards a Theory of Genericity Based on Government and Binding." In Conceptual Modeling - ER 2006, 311–24. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11901181_24.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Van Riemsdijk, Henk. "Crossover Between Acquisition Research and Government and Binding Theory: Comments on the Paper by Tom Roeper." In Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 311–18. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4548-7_9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Stabler, Edward P. "After Government and Binding Theory (Update of )." In Handbook of Logic and Language, 395–414. Elsevier, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-53726-3.00007-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

DeCaen, Vincent. "A Unified Analysis of Verbal and Verbless Clauses within Government-Binding Theory." In The Verbless Clause in Biblical Hebrew, 109–32. Penn State University Press, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.5325/j.ctv1bxh3hg.10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

De Caen, Vincent. "A Unified Analysis of Verbal and Verbless Clauses within Government-Binding Theory." In The Verbless Clause in Biblical Hebrew, 109–32. Penn State University Press, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781575065175-008.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Chomsky's Government and Binding theory"

1

Kuhns, Robert J. "Automatic indexing and Government-Binding Theory." In the 13th conference. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/991146.991231.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Kuhns, Robert J. "A PARLOG implementation of Government-Binding Theory." In the 13th conference. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/991146.991230.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kuhns, Robert J. "A PROLOG implementation of Government-Binding Theory." In the 11th coference. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/991365.991524.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Correa, Nelson. "An attribute-grammar implementation of Government-binding theory." In the 25th annual meeting. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/981175.981182.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Chen, Hsin-Hsi, I. Peng Lin, and Chien-Ping Wu. "A new design of prolog-based bottom-up parsing system with Government-Binding theory." In the 12th conference. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/991635.991659.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography