To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Citing articles.
Journal articles on the topic 'Citing articles'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Citing articles.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Jasinski, Robert W. "Citing Web Articles." American Journal of Roentgenology 190, no. 1 (2008): W76. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.07.2845.
Full text
2
Mueen Ahmed, K. K. "Citing JCDR articles: An insight." Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research 2, no. 3 (2011): 192–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-3583.85269.
Full text
3
Bukvic, Rajko. "Citing in Matica srpska social science quarterly in 2010: Empirical analysis as a contribution for founding scientometrics in Serbia." Zbornik Matice srpske za drustvene nauke, no. 136 (2011): 417–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn1136417b.
Full textAbstract:
In this paper is given an empirical analysis of the sources and the citing quality in the example of the Matica Srpska Social Science Quarterly in 2010. After the methodological notes, in the first part of the paper was considered the structure of citings, according to the informal classification (books, newspaper articles, proceedings papers, statistical sources and so on). Then, due to its importance, the citing structure of newspaper articles has been presented separately. In the second part of the paper special attention was drawn to the quality and reliability of citings in analyzed articles, where numerous flaws and deficiencies were pointed out. Those flaws relativize significantly the construction and use of the appropriate indicators for further scientometric analysis.
4
Ansorge, Libor. "Citation coverage by Dimensions and Scopus of articles published in European Science Editing." European Science Editing 49 (July 31, 2023): e102691. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2023.e102691.
Full textAbstract:
<strong>Background:</strong> The two main bibliometric databases, namely Web of Science and Scopus, are not available for free, whereas the Dimensions is one of the new freely available bibliometric databases and is considered to be an alternative to Scopus in particular.<strong>Objectives:</strong> To compare the information on citations to articles published in <em>European Science Editing</em> as available in the Dimensions to that available in Scopus.<strong>Methods:</strong> Information on articles published in <em>European Science Editing</em> that were cited in sources published between 2020 and 2022 was analysed to compare the relevant data as given by Dimensions and Scopus.<strong>Results:</strong> Both databases were similar in terms of the number of cited articles, the number of citing articles, and the number of citations. Of the total of 35 cited articles, 3 were unique to each of the 2 databases. Of the total of 93 citing articles, 74 were found in Scopus and 75 in the Dimensions.<strong>Conclusions:</strong> Scopus and Dimensions shared an overlap of 84% in articles cited but of only 60% in the citing articles. Information on individual citing articles strongly suggests that Dimensions takes data on citing articles from CrossRef. Unfortunately, these metadata contain errors. Data on citations in the Dimension database could be made more accurate if the references appended to the citing articles listed in the Crossref database were under an open license.
5
Lee, Danielle. "Analyzing Citing Articles of Korean Design Research." Korean Society of Science & Art 39, no. 5 (2021): 317–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.17548/ksaf.2021.12.30.317.
Full text
6
Chen, Anjun, and Drake O. Chen. "Accuracy of Chatbots in Citing Journal Articles." JAMA Network Open 6, no. 8 (2023): e2327647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.27647.
Full text
7
Parry, Peter, Stephen Allison, and Tarun Bastiampillai. "The geography of a controversial diagnosis: A bibliographic analysis of published academic perspectives on ‘paediatric bipolar disorder’." Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 24, no. 3 (2019): 529–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359104519836700.
Full textAbstract:
Background: The hypothesis that bipolar disorder presents before puberty with atypical mania has proved to be controversial. Published academic perspectives on the validity of Paediatric Bipolar Disorder (PBD) appear to vary between the United States and the rest of the world. Methods: We examined the perspectives of articles citing four seminal articles. The citing articles were grouped as either supportive or non-supportive of the PBD hypothesis, and the perspectives of the articles by US authors were compared with those by non-US authors. Results: There were 787 citing articles commenting on PBD, mostly published in US-based journals. Most authors were affiliated with several US institutions. Among the 624 articles with US authorship, the majority (83%) supported PBD. Of the 163 articles by non-US authors, most (60%) supported the traditional view that bipolar disorders are rare before mid-adolescence. Published academic perspectives in favour of the PBD hypothesis are mostly concentrated in several US institutions. Conclusion: There is majority support for PBD among citing articles from the United States, whereas the traditional perspective predominates in articles from most other countries.
8
Krampen, Günter, Thomas Huckert, and Gabriel Schui. "The Impact of Anglicizing Former German-Language Psychology Journals on Authorship and Citation Frequencies." European Psychologist 17, no. 3 (2012): 190–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000074.
Full textAbstract:
Exemplary for other than English-language psychology journals, the impact of recent Anglicization of five former German-language psychology journals on (1) authorship (nationality, i.e., native language, and number of authors, i.e., single or multiple authorships), (2) formal characteristics of the journal (number of articles per volume and length of articles), and (3) number of citations of the articles in other journal articles, the language of the citing publications, and the impact factors (IF) is analyzed. Scientometric data on these variables are gathered for all articles published in the four years before anglicizing and in the four years after anglicizing the same journal. Results reveal rather quick changes: Citations per year since original articles’ publication increase significantly, and the IF of the journals go up markedly. Frequencies of citing in German-language journals decrease, citing in English-language journals increase significantly after the Anglicization of former German-language psychology journals, and there is a general trend of increasing citations in other languages as well. Side effects of anglicizing former German-language psychology journals include the publication of shorter papers, their availability to a more international authorship, and a slight, but significant increase in multiple authorships.
9
HORN, KELLY. "The Consequences of Citing Hedged Statements in Scientific Research Articles." BioScience 51, no. 12 (2001): 1086. http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[1086:tcochs]2.0.co;2.
Full text
10
Stone, Mathew Lee. "UK Library and Information Science Research is Having a Significant Influence on Research in Other Subject Disciplines." Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 9, no. 1 (2014): 56. http://dx.doi.org/10.18438/b81s5w.
Full textAbstract:
Objective – To quantify the value of librarianship and information science (LIS) exports knowledge to other subject disciplines.
 
 Design – Bibliometric study.
 
 Setting – LIS departments in U.K. universities.
 
 Subjects – 232 LIS research articles published between 2001 and 2007. 
 
 Methods – Data from the 2008 U.K. Research Assessment Exercise were checked to identify 405 research articles submitted by 10 selected university departments (out of a total of 21), which submitted research in the LIS category. The Web of Science database was then searched to see how many of these articles had been cited in other articles (n=232). If the citing article was published in a non-LIS journal it was considered a knowledge export. Journals were defined as non-LIS if they had not been assigned the subject category of Information Science & Library Science by the Journal of Citation Reports. The journal Impact Factors (IFs) of citing journals were then normalized to measure the value of individual knowledge exports to their respective subject disciplines. This was done by comparing a citing journal’s IF with the median journal IF within that subject category. If the citing journal’s IF was above this median it was considered to be a valuable knowledge export.
 
 Main Results – The sample of LIS research articles produced a total of 1,061 knowledge exports in 444 unique non-LIS journals. These non-LIS journals covered 146 unique subject categories of which those related to computer science and chemistry/pharmacology cited LIS research with the greatest frequency. Just over three-quarters (n=798) of these citations were considered to be valuable knowledge exports. A sub-analysis showed that LIS articles published in non-LIS journals were significantly more valuable than the knowledge exports published in LIS journals.
 
 Conclusion – The validity of bibliometric studies can be improved by adopting the two methodological innovations presented in this study. The first innovation is to avoid over-estimating the number of knowledge exports by discounting “part exports” (i.e., where the citing journal is assigned to multiple subject categories, one of which includes the same as that of the cited reference). The second innovation introduced by this study is to add an extra dimension to the analysis by measuring the value of each knowledge export by taking into account the “normalized” impact factor of citing journals.
11
Griffin, Frank. "404 File Not Found: Citing Unstable Web Sources." Business Communication Quarterly 66, no. 2 (2003): 46–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/108056990306600204.
Full textAbstract:
Researchers, including students, must accommodate to the mutating character of hyperlinks on the World Wide Web. A small study of citations in three volumes of BCQ demonstrates the phenomenon of " URL rot," the disappearance of sites cited in the sample articles. Digital technology itself is now being used to create pockets of permanence, but with the understanding that preservation of content is only one ingredient in the mix of media and format migration. Databases like JSTOR offer digitally preserved copies of many scholarly journals. Online journals and search engines may offer their own archives. In general, researchers should cite digital articles in databases where possible and consider avoiding references to online journals with print editions.
12
Byrne, Benjamin E., Leila Rooshenas, Helen Lambert, and Jane M. Blazeby. "Evidence into practice: protocol for a new mixed-methods approach to explore the relationship between trials evidence and clinical practice through systematic identification and analysis of articles citing randomised controlled trials." BMJ Open 8, no. 11 (2018): e023215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023215.
Full textAbstract:
IntroductionRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide high-quality evidence to inform practice. However, much routine care is not based on available RCT evidence. Understanding this disconnect may improve trial design, reporting and implementation. Published literature commenting on RCTs may yield relevant insights. This protocol presents a new approach examining how researchers understand, contextualise and use evidence from RCTs, through analysis of letters, editorials and discussion pieces citing individual RCTs. Surgical case studies will illustrate its ability to identify wide-ranging factors influencing application of trials evidence.Methods and analysisIn-depth study of published literature will explore written responses to RCTs. After purposefully selecting individual RCTs, we will systematically identify all citing articles covered in Web of Science and Scopus. Editorials, discussions and letters will be included. These are considered most likely to provide critiques and opinions about index RCTs. Original articles and reviews will be excluded. Clinical specialty, RCT design, outcomes and bibliographical data will be collected for RCTs and citing articles. Citing articles will be thematically analysed using the constant comparison technique to explore author understanding, contextualisation and relationship to clinical practice for the index trial. Coding will include generic issues relevant to all RCTs, such as sample size or blinding, and features specific to surgery, such as learning curve. Index trial quality will be examined using validated tools. Results will be combined to create a broad overview of the understanding and use of RCT evidence.Ethics and disseminationThis study involves secondary use of existing articles and does not require ethical approval. Pilot work will establish its feasibility and inform progression to larger scale utilisation across a broad range of RCTs. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at surgical and methodological conferences. Results will guide future work on trial design to optimise implementation of results.
13
Gadad, Raju, B. Ravi, and Kiran Savanur. "Highly Cited paper of Bharat Ratna Prof. CNR Rao: A Scientometric Attempt." Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology 9, no. 1 (2019): 91–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2019.9.1.2628.
Full textAbstract:
This attempt scrutinizes Prof. CNR Rao’s one of the highly cited papers, published in the year 2009, has received 767 citations during 2010-2017out of which citations, 25 were self-citations and rest 742 citations by others. Highest numbers (139) of citing papers were published by 4authors, in which 32 citing papers were published in the year 2015.The article has highly cited by authors published in the journals journal (688), and Reviews (70). Total number of 767 citing articles further received 35563 citations during 2010-2017.
14
Kessenikh, Alexandr V. "Lessons of application of bibliometric systems." Science management: theory and practice 2, no. 3 (2020): 181–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.3.10.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to comprehending the facts of citing scientific publications on the author’s own experience. The connection of citation with the quality, importance and originality of the study is not in doubt. Nevertheless, some reasons for the appearance of citations are considered, including erroneous ones, and doubt is expressed in the unambiguous scientometric value of quoting factors in known cases. The unique role of each of the co-authors of the publication is emphasized. The problem of not widely citing many works on the history of science is discussed. A case of actually formal co-authorship and an example of an error in citing a work are indicated. A summary of the content of one of the non-cited articles of the author and comments on the reasons for the lack of links to it is given. A brief history of the creation and publication of the most cited articles of the author is considered. This includes colleagues who suggested the idea of a theoretical explanation of the observed effect, ensured its verification, and authors of subsequent articles who discussed the publication in detail and ensured its relatively wide citation. Most of the colleagues mentioned were not formally co-authors of the articles. Shows portraits of the prominent scientists, referring to the work of the author, or to stimulate their appearance and publication
15
Gamon, Michael, Sumit Basu, Dmitriy Belenko, Danyel Fisher, and Matthew Hurst. "BLEWS: Using Blogs to Provide Context for News Articles." Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 2, no. 1 (2021): 60–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v2i1.18616.
Full textAbstract:
An overwhelming number of news articles are available every day via the internet. Unfortunately, it is impossible for us to peruse more than a handful; furthermore it is difficult to ascertain an article's social context, i.e., is it popular, what sorts of people are reading it, etc. In this paper, we develop a system to address this problem in the restricted domain of political news by harnessing implicit and explicit contextual information from the blogosphere. Specifically, we track thousands of blogs and the news articles they cite, collapsing news articles that have highly overlapping content. We then tag each article with the number of blogs citing it, the political orientation of those blogs, and the level of emotional charge expressed in the blog posts that link to the news article. We summarize and present the results to the user via a novel visualization which displays this contextual information; the user can then find the most popular articles, the articles most cited by liberals, the articles most emotionally discussed in the political blogosphere, etc.
16
Heibi, Ivan, and Silvio Peroni. "A protocol to gather, characterize and analyze incoming citations of retracted articles." PLOS ONE 17, no. 7 (2022): e0270872. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270872.
Full textAbstract:
In this article, we present a methodology which takes as input a collection of retracted articles, gathers the entities citing them, characterizes such entities according to multiple dimensions (disciplines, year of publication, sentiment, etc.), and applies a quantitative and qualitative analysis on the collected values. The methodology is composed of four phases: (1) identifying, retrieving, and extracting basic metadata of the entities which have cited a retracted article, (2) extracting and labeling additional features based on the textual content of the citing entities, (3) building a descriptive statistical summary based on the collected data, and finally (4) running a topic modeling analysis. The goal of the methodology is to generate data and visualizations that help understanding possible behaviors related to retraction cases. We present the methodology in a structured step-by-step form following its four phases, discuss its limits and possible workarounds, and list the planned future improvements.
17
Gehanno, Jean-Francois, Julien Grosjean, Stefan J. Darmoni, and Laetitia Rollin. "Reliability of citations of medRxiv preprints in articles published on COVID-19 in the world leading medical journals." PLOS ONE 17, no. 8 (2022): e0264661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264661.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction Preprints have been widely cited during the COVID-19 pandemics, even in the major medical journals. However, since subsequent publication of preprint is not always mentioned in preprint repositories, some may be inappropriately cited or quoted. Our objectives were to assess the reliability of preprint citations in articles on COVID-19, to the rate of publication of preprints cited in these articles and to compare, if relevant, the content of the preprints to their published version. Methods Articles published on COVID in 2020 in the BMJ, The Lancet, the JAMA and the NEJM were manually screened to identify all articles citing at least one preprint from medRxiv. We searched PubMed, Google and Google Scholar to assess if the preprint had been published in a peer-reviewed journal, and when. Published articles were screened to assess if the title, data or conclusions were identical to the preprint version. Results Among the 205 research articles on COVID published by the four major medical journals in 2020, 60 (29.3%) cited at least one medRxiv preprint. Among the 182 preprints cited, 124 were published in a peer-reviewed journal, with 51 (41.1%) before the citing article was published online and 73 (58.9%) later. There were differences in the title, the data or the conclusion between the preprint cited and the published version for nearly half of them. MedRxiv did not mentioned the publication for 53 (42.7%) of preprints. Conclusions More than a quarter of preprints citations were inappropriate since preprints were in fact already published at the time of publication of the citing article, often with a different content. Authors and editors should check the accuracy of the citations and of the quotations of preprints before publishing manuscripts that cite them.
18
Ansorge, Libor, and Lada Stejskalová. "Citation Accuracy: A Case Study on Definition of the Grey Water Footprint." Publications 11, no. 1 (2023): 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/publications11010008.
Full textAbstract:
Citing sources is an important part of any research paper. A number of studies in the past have dealt with discrepancies or errors in citations. The citation errors range from several percent to tens of percent. Although in most cases, these are minor formal inconsistencies that do not prevent tracing the source used, there are cases where the citations are incorrect or refer to non-existent articles. In this study, an analysis of the citation of the grey water footprint definition was conducted. The water footprint concept was introduced in 2002 as a methodology for the description of quantity aspects linked to water use in the life cycle. The grey water footprint, which represents the quality aspects of water use, was added to the water footprint concept later on. In this study, almost 300 articles that provide a definition of the grey water footprint and are indexed in the Scopus database were reviewed. More than two-thirds of the articles added the definition by citing the source. Only 3.5% of the citing articles contained an incorrect citation that could be considered a significant error. Although this is a low number, these significant errors have been appearing only in recent years. This suggests the possibility that the percentage of errors could gradually increase as the use of grey water footprint expands in practice. In the first period (up to 2017), only the grey water footprint originators are cited. From 2017 onwards, papers not written by the originators of the grey water footprint idea are also cited.
19
Lee, Danielle. "Bibliometric Analysis of Citation Patterns in Korean Kinesiology Research." Korean Journal of Sport Science 33, no. 1 (2022): 41–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.24985/kjss.2022.33.1.41.
Full textAbstract:
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to analyze various citation patterns such as the scope and intensity of the academic influence of Korean "Kinesiology" studies.METHODS To this end, this paper collected and analyzed 17,693 target articles published in 22 KCI-accredited “Kinesiology” related journals from 2001 to 2014, and 98,941 citing cases that took advantage of target articles as references. Specifically, this paper analyzed the citation pattern by dividing it into two parts. First, this paper analyzed the distribution of citations in individual target articles and the top-cited articles and top-cited researchers. Second, this paper also analyzed the citing articles; such as in which journal, what academic field, and in what pattern the “Kinesiology” target articles were cited.RESULTS As a result, 15% of the target articles were not cited at all for five years after publication, while 6.8% of papers were cited more than 17 times, which was exceptionally more cited compared to the majority of target articles. There were no research topics exclusively exerting influence in Korean "Kinesiology" research, but relatively many cited thesis topics include 'self-management, 'leisure statement', 'psychological well-being', 'self-confidence', 'service quality', and 'leisure flow'. Besides, the Korean "Kinesiology" articles accounted for 76% of the total of about 98,000 citations, having greater influence within the same academic field than other academic fields.CONCLUSIONS This study contributes to the relevant literature in that it is one of the early endeavors to study the citation pattern for the entire Korean kinesiology articles.
20
Kang, In-Su. "Using Collective Citing Sentences to Recognize Cited Text in Computational Linguistics Articles." Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information 21, no. 11 (2016): 85–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2016.21.11.085.
Full text
21
Cappello, Alicia, and Janice Miller-Young. "Who Are We Citing and How? A SoTL Citation Analysis." Teaching & Learning Inquiry 8, no. 2 (2020): 3–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.2.2.
Full textAbstract:
The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) is continuing to develop as a multidisciplinary, international field of practice and a topic of study itself. As the field matures, one area of interest has been the SoTL literature review. However, there has not been an evidence-based study of SoTL citation practices. The purpose of this study was to analyze one year’s worth of articles from this journal to see how references and in-text citations are used. Overall, 514 references and 954 in-text citations were found across 18 articles. A diverse range of multidisciplinary and specialized academic journals were cited; 8 percent of in-text citations cited a source other than an academic journal. Each reference and in-text citation was coded as either substantive (Applied, Contrastive, or Supportive) or non-substantive (Reviewed or Perfunctory). A high rate of in-text citations (74 percent) were found to be non-substantive, with the majority of non-substantive in-text citations (71 percent) found in either the Introduction or Literature Review sections of the articles. Conversely, of the 26 percent of in-text citations considered substantive, 50 percent were found in either the Results & Discussion or Conclusion sections. We demonstrate the use of the coding scheme as a self-assessment tool and conclude by suggesting that SoTL authors and reviewers could use it to assess the depth and breadth of their literature reviews.
22
Ma, Tsu-Jui, and Gwo-Guang Lee. "Outsourcing library functions: a bibliometric study in SSCI." Bottom Line 29, no. 4 (2016): 251–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/bl-12-2015-0022.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the bibliometric study of journal articles in Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) related to outsourcing library functions, including publication trends from 1994 to 2015, core journals, authorship and citing articles used for librarians and researchers to have a basic reference of relevant resources. Design/methodology/approach The methodology consisted of journal article searches in SSCI with 1994-2015 as the date limiter. The search terms came from the topic of outsourcing to the topic of library by using the Boolean operator; and results were used in the Web of Science (WOS) database based on pre-determined categories and were evaluated based on the five research questions about core journals, authorship and citing articles. Findings The findings were based on the five research questions evaluated in the bibliometric study. There were 55 articles published on the topics of outsourcing and library authored by 80 individuals between 1994 and 2015. In the 55 articles analyzed, there were 24 different journals represented with 150 times cited. Originality/value This study takes the bibliometric analysis approach, which has rarely been used on the topics of outsourcing and library articles with the specific focus on library finance issues. It provides a foundation for further research on the topic as well as resources to be used by librarians and researchers.
23
Järvelin, Kalervo, and Pertti Vakkari. "Who cites the contributions by information science?" Journal of Documentation 80, no. 7 (2024): 98–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jd-01-2024-0019.
Full textAbstract:
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to find out which research topics and methods in information science (IS) articles are used in other disciplines as indicated by citations.Design/methodology/approachThe study analyzes citations to articles in IS published in 31 scholarly IS journals in 2015. The study employs content analysis of articles published in 2015 receiving citations from publication venues representing IS and other disciplines in the citation window 2015–2021. The unit of analysis is the article-citing discipline pair. The data set consists of 1178 IS articles cited altogether 25 K times through 5 K publication venues. Each citation is seen as a contribution to the citing document’s discipline by the cited article, which represents some IS subareas and methodologies, and the author team's disciplinary composition, which is inferred from the authors’ affiliations.FindingsThe results show that the citation profiles of disciplines vary depending on research topics, methods and author disciplines. Disciplines external to IS are typically cited in IS articles authored by scholars with the same background. Thus, the export of ideas from IS to other disciplines is evidently smaller than the earlier findings claim. IS should not be credited for contributions by other disciplines published in IS literature.Originality/valueThis study is the first to analyze which research topics and methods in the articles of IS are of use in other disciplines as indicated by citations.
24
Chen, Yongli, and Yujun Lian. "Browse and cite Stata manuals easily: The wwwhelp command." Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata 24, no. 1 (2024): 161–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1536867x241233676.
Full textAbstract:
In this article, we describe a new command, wwwhelp, that facilitates direct access to online versions of Stata’s official help files or PDF documentation. Addressing the challenges associated with storing, citing, and sharing documentation, wwwhelp complements the help command by enabling access to documentation outside the Stata environment. In addition to fully using the abundant resources available on Stata’s website, wwwhelp enhances the convenience of citing Stata commands in articles and blog posts, thereby promoting the utilization and dissemination of Stata commands.
25
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann. "Writing Empirical Articles: Transparency, Reproducibility, Clarity, and Memorability." Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1, no. 3 (2018): 403–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754485.
Full textAbstract:
This article provides recommendations for writing empirical journal articles that enable transparency, reproducibility, clarity, and memorability. Recommendations for transparency include preregistering methods, hypotheses, and analyses; submitting registered reports; distinguishing confirmation from exploration; and showing your warts. Recommendations for reproducibility include documenting methods and results fully and cohesively, by taking advantage of open-science tools, and citing sources responsibly. Recommendations for clarity include writing short paragraphs, composed of short sentences; writing comprehensive abstracts; and seeking feedback from a naive audience. Recommendations for memorability include writing narratively; embracing the hourglass shape of empirical articles; beginning articles with a hook; and synthesizing, rather than Mad Libbing, previous literature.
26
Shi, Xiaolin, Belle Tseng, and Lada Adamic. "Information Diffusion in Computer Science Citation Networks." Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 3, no. 1 (2009): 319–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13974.
Full textAbstract:
The paper citation network is a traditional social medium for the exchange of ideas and knowledge. In this paper we examine information diffusion in citation networks by analyzing the correlations between various citation choices and the subsequent impact of the articles. We find that citing recent papers and papers within the same scholarly community garners a slightly larger number of citations on average. However, this correlation is weaker among well-cited papers implying that for high impact work citing within one's field is of lesser importance.
27
MELNIK, Valeriya, Tetyana V. ANDRUSHCHENKO, Oksana SUSHKO, et al. "Retracted article: Power as a Factor of Educational and Sociocultural Processes." WISDOM 17, no. 1 (2021): 125–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v17i1.436.
Full textAbstract:
The article is retracted by the Editorial Team because of constituting plagiarism from the PhD dissertation of Alexander Kitarioglo “Pedagogicheskaya vlast’ v sovremennom obshchestve: Socialxno-filosofkii analiz (Pedagogical Power in the Modern Society: Social and Philosophical Analysis, in Russian), http://elib.sfu-kras.ru/handle/2311/141030, 2017”. The authors that submit their articles to the journal WISDOM should guarantee that their articles and its essential substance have not previously been published and are not being considered for publication elsewhere. According to the WISDOM publication policy it is not allowed: a) verbatim copyright of another person’s work without citing the author; b) non accurate paraphrasing of another person’s work where more than one sentence within a paragraph or section of a text has been altered or sentences have been rearranged without an appropriate attribution; c) reuse of elements of other person’s work without citing the author. All cases of not following the publication policy of WISDOM will result in immediate retraction.
28
Chen, Chuanfu, Qiao Li, Zhiqing Deng, Kuei Chiu, and Ping Wang. "The preferences of Chinese LIS journal articles in citing works outside the discipline." Journal of Documentation 74, no. 1 (2018): 99–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jd-04-2017-0057.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand how Chinese library and information science (LIS) journal articles cite works from outside the discipline (WOD) to identify the impact of knowledge import from outside the discipline on LIS development. Design/methodology/approach This paper explores the Chinese LIS’ preferences in citing WOD by employing bibliometrics and machine learning techniques. Findings Chinese LIS citations to WOD account for 29.69 percent of all citations, and they rise over time. Computer science, education and communication are the most frequently cited disciplines. Under the categorization of Biglan model, Chinese LIS prefers to cite WOD from soft science, applied science or nonlife science. In terms of community affiliation, the cited authors are mostly from the academic community, but rarely from the practice community. Mass media has always been a citation source that is hard to ignore. There is a strong interest of Chinese LIS in citing emerging topics. Practical implications This paper can be implemented in the reformulation of Chinese LIS knowledge system, the promotion of interdisciplinary collaboration, the development of LIS library collection and faculty advancement. It may also be used as a reference to develop strategies for the global LIS. Originality/value This paper fills the research gap in analyzing citations to WOD from Chinese LIS articles and their impacts on LIS, and recommends that Chinese LIS should emphasize on knowledge both on technology and people as well as knowledge from the practice community, cooperate with partners from other fields, thus to produce knowledge meeting the demands from library and information practice as well as users.
29
Harter, Stephen P., Thomas E. Nisonger, and Aiwei Weng. "Semantic relationships between cited and citing articles in library and information science journals." Journal of the American Society for Information Science 44, no. 9 (1993): 543–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199310)44:9<543::aid-asi4>3.0.co;2-f.
Full text
30
Santos, Erika Alves dos, Silvio Peroni, and Marcos Luiz Mucheroni. "An analysis of citing and referencing habits across all scholarly disciplines: approaches and trends in bibliographic referencing and citing practices." Journal of Documentation 79, no. 7 (2023): 196–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jd-10-2022-0234.
Full textAbstract:
PurposeIn this study, the authors want to identify current possible causes for citing and referencing errors in scholarly literature to compare if something changed from the snapshot provided by Sweetland in his 1989 paper.Design/methodology/approachThe authors analysed reference elements, i.e. bibliographic references, mentions, quotations and respective in-text reference pointers, from 729 articles published in 147 journals across the 27 subject areas.FindingsThe outcomes of the analysis pointed out that bibliographic errors have been perpetuated for decades and that their possible causes have increased, despite the encouraged use of technological facilities, i.e. the reference managers.Originality/valueAs far as the authors know, the study is the best recent available analysis of errors in referencing and citing practices in the literature since Sweetland (1989).
31
Ford, Deborah K., and Brett Guidry. "Accessing and Citing In-Press Journal of Management Articles: The Role of OnlineFirst and the Digital Object Identifier." Journal of Management 35, no. 2 (2008): 197–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206309333552.
Full textAbstract:
This article provides helpful information to researchers, students, and authors who wish to find and cite in-press articles in the Journal of Management ( JOM). Any manuscript that has survived the review process innately possesses relevant information, and having access to these articles in their final form the moment they are ready for publication holds obvious benefits. Reading in-press articles helps researchers keep abreast of current findings and the latest advances in the field. Citing in-press articles encourages the advancement of research and demonstrates up-to-date knowledge of the subject matter. In addition, these most current documents are essential when evaluating the potential contribution of a given article. Although the review process helps to determine whether or not submitted articles provide meaningful contributions, evaluating new concepts in the context of research that has already been accepted for publication assures that each new submission significantly advances the field.
32
Zhu, Hongmei, Yongliang Jia, and Siu-wai Leung. "Citations of microRNA Biomarker Articles That Were Retracted." JAMA Network Open 7, no. 3 (2024): e243173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3173.
Full textAbstract:
ImportanceRetraction is a tool that journals can use to deter research misconduct and alert their audience to erroneous content published in the journals. However, retracted articles may continue to damage science if they are still cited as legitimate articles.ObjectiveTo characterize patterns of postretraction citations, particularly in microRNA biomarker research, a field with one of the highest rates of retraction.Evidence ReviewRetracted scientific articles on microRNAs were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and Retraction Watch between database inception and July 17, 2021, according to preestablished search strategies. Control articles with characteristics in common with retracted articles (ie, published in the same journals in the same years and months and with the same number of authors) were matched and retrieved from PubMed. Citation metrics of retractions and control articles were collected from Web of Science. PubPeer was referenced to examine the public response or comments on included retractions. Data were analyzed from September 2021 through March 2023.FindingsA total of 10 461 articles were analyzed, with 887 retractions and 9574 articles as controls. Among retracted articles, which were published from 1999 to 2021, there were 756 articles (85.23%) written by researchers affiliated with Chinese institutions. Retracted articles were cited 6327 times after retraction. Of 792 retracted articles that were cited, 621 articles (78.41%) were cited at least once after retraction and 238 articles (30.05%) were cited more often after retraction than before retraction. Overall citations (comprising citations before and after retraction) and postretraction citations accumulated over time (eg, the median [IQR] number of postretraction citations was 1 [1-2] and 23 [9-44] citations at the first 6 and 66 months, respectively, between retraction and citation retrieval). A random sample of 87 retracted articles (9.81%) recorded 478 citations after retraction, with 208 citations (43.51%) in articles published 12 months or longer after retraction. Of these citing articles, 19 articles (3.97%) mentioned the retractions. Compared with the control group of 1620 nonretracted articles, no significant differences were found in overall number of citations or citations after retraction. Among 478 articles citing retracted articles, 414 articles were found on PubMed and had matched control articles; these articles had higher odds of being subsequently retracted than 7954 matched control articles (odds ratio, 6.57; 95% CI, 3.39-12.72).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, retraction was not associated with a reduction in citations of retracted articles, but articles that cited retracted publications had higher odds of later retraction. These findings suggest that journals may need to implement mechanisms for detection of postretraction citations.
33
Xu, Alexander, and Vinay Prasad. "The use and meaning of the parachute metaphor in biomedicine: a citation analysis of a systematic review and a randomized trial of the parachute for freefall." Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 11, no. 6 (2022): 383–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/cer-2021-0171.
Full textAbstract:
Background: Numerous authors have used the ‘parachute' analogy to comment on the importance of and need for randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) in the hierarchy of medical evidence. Methods: The authors completed a retrospective literature analysis examining publications citing the 2003 parachute paper by Smith and Pell and a 2018 RCT of a parachute by Yeh et al. For all of the articles that directly analogized a medical intervention to a parachute, the authors identified the desired outcome of the practice and searched PubMed for relevant RCTs. Results: Authors citing the parachute analogy are often critical of RCTs and often draw comparisons to interventions that are not parachutes.
34
Wang, Binglu, Yi Bu, and Yang Xu. "A quantitative exploration on reasons for citing articles from the perspective of cited authors." Scientometrics 116, no. 2 (2018): 675–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2787-6.
Full text
35
Trivison, Donna. "Term co-occurrence in cited/citing journal articles as a measure of document similarity." Information Processing & Management 23, no. 3 (1987): 183–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(87)90003-3.
Full text
36
Darmawan, Anatasya Indah Putri. "A Corpus Analysis of United Nations Goodwill Ambassadors: Are Celebrity Diplomats Relevant Amid the Pandemic?" E3S Web of Conferences 426 (2023): 02148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342602148.
Full textAbstract:
When the Covid-19 pandemic struck, the world was unprepared for the magnitude of effects that followed. The entire outbreak shook all countries, and governments, world leaders, and health professionals are trying to stop the health crisis. Politicians, celebrities, and especially the United Nations Goodwill Ambassadors have spoken out about issues related to the pandemic. However, studies on this particular subject remain in its infancy. To fill the literature gap, the current paper applies a corpus analysis to examine the patterns in news articles citing celebrities UN Goodwill Ambassadors as they are discussing the Covid-19 pandemic. As this paper is interested in collecting all reports published during the pandemic times, the timeline is set from 2020 up to 2022. The findings suggest that there are at least three main messages reflected in news articles citing celebrities UN Goodwill Ambassadors, namely the impacts of the pandemic, measures to overcome the global health crisis, and the importance of donations. This study sheds light on how celebrity diplomats continue to shape their roles in international communities by leveraging their influence as public figures.
37
Tomaszewski, Robert. "Citations to chemical databases in scholarly articles: to cite or not to cite?" Journal of Documentation 75, no. 6 (2019): 1317–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jd-12-2018-0214.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose Chemical databases have had a significant impact on the way scientists search for and use information. The purpose of this paper is to spark informed discussion and fuel debate on the issue of citations to chemical databases. Design/methodology/approach A citation analysis to four major chemical databases was undertaken to examine resource coverage and impact in the scientific literature. Two commercial databases (SciFinder and Reaxys) and two public databases (PubChem and ChemSpider) were analyzed using the “Cited Reference Search” in the Science Citation Index Expanded from the Web of Science (WoS) database. Citations to these databases between 2000 and 2016 (inclusive) were evaluated by document types and publication growth curves. A review of the distribution trends of chemical databases in peer-reviewed articles was conducted through a citation count analysis by country, organization, journal and WoS category. Findings In total, 862 scholarly articles containing a citation to one or more of the four databases were identified as only steadily increasing since 2000. The study determined that authors at academic institutions worldwide reference chemical databases in high-impact journals from notable publishers and mainly in the field of chemistry. Originality/value The research is a first attempt to evaluate the practice of citation to major chemical databases in the scientific literature. This paper proposes that citing chemical databases gives merit and recognition to the resources as well as credibility and validity to the scholarly communication process and also further discusses recommendations for citing and referencing databases.
38
Wolf, Dennis M., and Peter A. Williamson. "Impact Factor and Study Design: The Academic Value of Published Research (AVaRes) Score." Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England 91, no. 1 (2009): 71–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588409x359222.
Full textAbstract:
INTRODUCTION To compare the citation indices of original articles and case reports in otolaryngology journals and thereby determine whether case reports are of less interest and possibly of academically inferior value to original articles. METIERIALS AND METHODS All articles in two reputable UK otolaryngology journals (Clinical Otolaryngology and Journal of Laryngology and Otology) for 2000 and 2001 were identified. Citation indices were obtained from ISI Web of Knowledge and compared. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft® Office Excel 2003. RESULTS Review articles were cited most frequently with a mean of 5.21 followed by original articles with 4.28 citations and case reports with 2.40 citations. The difference in citing between original articles and case reports was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in citations between review articles and original articles. CONCLUSIONS As case reports are clearly of lesser academic value than original and review articles, we suggest a scoring system incorporating journal impact factor and a scoring multiple taking into account study design. This facilitates easier comparison and recognition of publications in curricula vitae during job application.
39
Nash, Carol. "Commentary on Studies Citing This Author Concerning Doodling as a Measure of Burnout." Journal of Mental Health Disorders 4, no. 1 (2024): 8–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.33696/mentalhealth.4.020.
Full textAbstract:
The ability of doodling to act as an indicator of depression and anxiety regarding research burnout is a topic that has seen the publication of six articles by this author since 2021. This commentary aims to determine the extent to which any of these articles have been cited by subsequent researchers in furthering the literature on doodling. The keywords “C Nash Doodling Burnout” were searched through Google Scholar in February 2024 with 142 returns. Only four of these reports included all keywords. Of these returned studies, two were found to add to the literature on doodling substantially, in part as a result of the citations to the work of this author. However, one of these two publications did so while also including a misrepresentation of this author’s work. With few studies on doodling behavior, noting these publications and their limitations represents an important contribution. This work also adds to the paucity of publications by authors examining citations to their work.
40
Priyanka and Rupak Charkarvaty. "Measuring Patent-Citations of LIS Literature: An analytical study of the Journal Scientometrics." Library Philosophy and Practice (LPP), no. 5954 (July 2, 2021): 18. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167355.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The purpose of this study is to analyse the utility and application of Library and Information Science (LIS) research in patents representing innovations, inventions and new knowledge. With this research, we have tried to bridge a gap between LIS research and patents, which is unavailable till date in literature. To conduct the study, various patent search databases were used. Data in the form of DOIs were extracted from Scopus database for the journal Scientometrics and were processed and analysed in visualisation software and spreadsheet software. The findings reveals how industries filing patents derive valuable inputs from LIS research in terms of its utilization, recognition and acceptance. This research paper will enhance the understanding regarding LIS, what is its value in Research and Development (R&D). Normally, it is believed that only STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Medical) research is fruitful for patents and innovations. The study breaks the glass ceiling as it provides an evidence based approach to justify the LIS research does play a crucial role in growth, development and progress of the society through its existence and proven integration with the patents. The findings reveal that LIS research is influencing Patents as they are being cited regularly with the growth in this discipline.
41
Pletnev, Dmitri A., and Tatyana V Levikova. "Features of Scientometric Results of a Russian Scientific Journal: the Case of the Scientific Direction “Economic Sciences” of the Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University." Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University 482, no. 12 (2024): 108–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2023-482-12-108-117.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents the results of the use in the academic community of articles of the scientific journal Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University in the direction of “Economic Sciences”. The study is based on data from the RSCI information system for 2018–2022. The total number of citations for each issue, individual articles, and the H‑index for issues and by year were calculated. The main trends and patterns in citing articles have been identified, including a three-year delay, passion for the topic of digitalization, inattention to articles by young authors and to international topics. The results of the study may be useful to editors of scientific journals for comparing the indicators of their journals with the one studied in this article, as well as for improving editorial policies.
42
Lee, Yei-Soon, Julie Chi Chow, Tsair-Wei Chien, and Willy Chou. "Using chord diagrams to explore article themes in 100 top-cited articles citing Hirsch’s h-index since 2005: A bibliometric analysis." Medicine 102, no. 8 (2023): e33057. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000033057.
Full text
43
Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H., Chava L. Ramspek, Friedo W. Dekker, et al. "TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models." BMJ Open 10, no. 9 (2020): e041537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041537.
Full textAbstract:
ObjectivesTo assess the difference in completeness of reporting and methodological conduct of published prediction models before and after publication of the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) statement.MethodsIn the seven general medicine journals with the highest impact factor, we compared the completeness of the reporting and the quality of the methodology of prediction model studies published between 2012 and 2014 (pre-TRIPOD) with studies published between 2016 and 2017 (post-TRIPOD). For articles published in the post-TRIPOD period, we examined whether there was improved reporting for articles (1) citing the TRIPOD statement, and (2) published in journals that published the TRIPOD statement.ResultsA total of 70 articles was included (pre-TRIPOD: 32, post-TRIPOD: 38). No improvement was seen for the overall percentage of reported items after the publication of the TRIPOD statement (pre-TRIPOD 74%, post-TRIPOD 76%, 95% CI of absolute difference: −4% to 7%). For the individual TRIPOD items, an improvement was seen for 16 (44%) items, while 3 (8%) items showed no improvement and 17 (47%) items showed a deterioration. Post-TRIPOD, there was no improved reporting for articles citing the TRIPOD statement, nor for articles published in journals that published the TRIPOD statement. The methodological quality improved in the post-TRIPOD period. More models were externally validated in the same article (absolute difference 8%, post-TRIPOD: 39%), used measures of calibration (21%, post-TRIPOD: 87%) and discrimination (9%, post-TRIPOD: 100%), and used multiple imputation for handling missing data (12%, post-TRIPOD: 50%).ConclusionsSince the publication of the TRIPOD statement, some reporting and methodological aspects have improved. Prediction models are still often poorly developed and validated and many aspects remain poorly reported, hindering optimal clinical application of these models. Long-term effects of the TRIPOD statement publication should be evaluated in future studies.
44
VOJINOVIĆ, Vladimir. "ON ZALOGA BY VLADIMIR MIJUŠKOVIĆ." Lingua Montenegrina 19, no. 1 (2017): 121–30. https://doi.org/10.46584/lm.v19i1.552.
Full textAbstract:
In this paper, the author provides bio-bibliographical information about Vladimir Mijušković, Montenegrin journalist, novelist and professor. Citing articles from interwar and postwar periodicals and analyzing Mijušković’s novel from post-structuralist standpoint, the author draws conclusions about the value and importance of that narrative, positioning Mijušković’s work and discussing the future relationship of historians of literature to life and work of Vladimir Mijušković.
45
Plunkett, Margaret. "Exploring Citation Patterns of Australian Research into Teachers of Gifted Students through a Focused Study of Articles Published in the Australasian Journal of Gifted Education 1992- 2024." Australasian Journal of Gifted Education 33, no. 2 (2024): 5–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.21505/ajge.2024.0012.
Full textAbstract:
This document analysis sought to examine the nature and scope of articles relating to teaching and giftedness published in Australia’s only gifted education journal – the Australasian Journal of Gifted Education (AJGE) from 1992 to 2024. Utilising the Publish or Perish software program to identify a corpus of related literature published in the AJGE since its inception, 43 articles were chosen as fitting the search criteria. For each article, basic descriptors are provided including the frequency of citing other research from within the AJGE. Previous research has identified limitations in Australian gifted education research but also acknowledged the small and relatively young field’s promising achievement of a level of recognition through a developing citation profile (Jolly et al., 2024). Yet this could be enhanced through a more dedicated commitment on the part of Australian researchers to cite relevant Australian research wherever possible, to ensure the continued progression of our citation profile. This study provides insight into citing patterns by AJGE authors in one topic area, in the hope that it will encourage future contributors to more frequently examine and cite local research in the field.
46
Ali, S. Nazim. "Subject relationship between articles determined by co-occurrence of keywords in citing and cited titles." Journal of Information Science 19, no. 3 (1993): 225–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555159301900306.
Full text
47
Ho, Sam Yu-Chieh, Tsair-Wei Chien, Chien-Cheng Huang, and Kang-Ting Tsai. "A comparison of 3 productive authors’ research domains based on sources from articles, cited references and citing articles using social network analysis." Medicine 101, no. 44 (2022): e31335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000031335.
Full text
48
Habibzadeh, P. "Decay of References to Web sites in Articles Published in General Medical Journals: Mainstream vs Small Journals." Applied Clinical Informatics 04, no. 04 (2013): 455–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/aci-2013-07-ra-0055.
Full textAbstract:
SummaryBackground: Over the last decade, Web sites (URLs) have been increasingly cited in scientific articles. However, the contents of the page of interest may change over the time.Objective: To investigate the trend of citation to URLs in five general medical journals since January 2006 to June 2013 and to compare the trends in mainstream journals with small journals.Methods: References of all original articles and review articles published between January 2006 and June 2013 in three regional journals – Archives of Iranian Medicine (AIM), Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal (EMHJ), and Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute (JPMI) – and two mainstream journals – The Lancet and British Medical Journal (BMJ) – were reviewed. The references were checked to determine the frequency of citation to URLs as well as the rate of accessibility of the URLs cited.Results: A total of 2822 articles was studied. Since January 2006 onward, the number of citations to URLs increased in the journals (doubling time ranged from 4.2 years in EMHJ to 13.9 years in AIM). Overall, the percentage of articles citing at least one URL has increased from 24% in 2006 to 48.5% in 2013. Accessibility to URLs decayed as the references got old (half life ranged from 2.2 years in EMHJ to 5.3 years in BMJ). The ratio of citation to URLs in the studied mainstream journals, as well as the ratio of URLs accessible were significantly (p<0.001) higher than the small medical journals.Conclusion: URLs are increasingly cited, but their contents decay with time. The trend of citing and decaying URLs are different in mainstream journals compared to small medical journals. Decay of URL contents would jeopardize the accuracy of the references and thus, the body of evidence. One way to tackle this important obstacle is to archive URLs permanently.Citation: Habibzadeh P. Decay of references to web sites in articles published in general medical journals: Mainstream vs small journals. Appl Clin Inf 2013; 4: 455–464http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2013-07-RA-0055
49
Klitzing, Nikolai, Rink Hoekstra, and Jan-Willem Strijbos. "Literature practices: processes leading up to a citation." Journal of Documentation 75, no. 1 (2019): 62–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jd-03-2018-0047.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose Literature practices represent the process leading up to the citation of a source, and consist of the selection, reading and citing of sources. The purpose of this paper is to explore possible factors that might influence researchers during this process and discover possible consequences of researchers’ citation behaviours. Design/methodology/approach In this exploratory study, various factors which could influence literature practices were explored via a questionnaire amongst 112 researchers. Participants were first authors of articles published in 2016 in one of five different journals within the disciplines of experimental psychology, educational sciences and social psychology. Academic positions of the participants ranged from PhD student to full professor. Findings Frequencies and percentages showed that researchers seemed to be influenced in their literature practices by various factors, such as editors suggesting articles and motivation to cite. Additionally, a high percentage of researchers reported taking shortcuts when citing articles (e.g. using secondary citations and reading selectively). Logistic regression did not reveal a clear relationship between academic work experience and research practices. Practical implications Seeing that researchers seem to be influenced by a variety of factors in their literature practices, the scientific community might benefit from better citation practices and guidelines in order to provide more structure to the process of literature practices. Originality/value This paper provides first insights into researchers’ literature practices. Possible reasons for problems with citation accuracy and replicating research findings are highlighted. Opportunities for further research on the topic of citation behaviours are presented.
50
Hasanah, Fitria Nur, Fika Megawati, Noly Shofiyah, Miftahul Jannah, and Rindiani Rindiani. "Pelatihan Daring Penulisan Artikel Ilmiah Bagi Guru Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Negeri 1 Sidoarjo." JPM (Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat) 5, no. 2 (2020): 515–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.21067/jpm.v5i2.4414.
Full textAbstract:
As a professional teacher must have various abilities, one of the ability to write scientific papers in the form of scientific articles. By writing scientific papers, in addition to getting a promotion, position and class, will be used as a benchmark of success and to demonstrate professionalism. Departing from the problems at the partner school, the purpose of this training activity is to improve teachers' understanding and ability to write scientific articles that are in accordance with the journal template. The target of this activity is teachers at SMK N 1 Sidoarjo. The methods used in this training are lecture, question and answer, mentoring to write scientific articles, and citing references. Based on the results of the pre-test and post-test conducted during the training showed that there was an increase in knowledge about writing scientific articles. Increasing the percentage of knowledge about the article component by 46%, increasing the ethical knowledge of writing articles by 58%, and increasing knowledge about uploading articles in national journals by 54%.