Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Class II Division 2 / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Class II Division 2.

Journal articles on the topic 'Class II Division 2'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Class II Division 2.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Hershcopf, Steven A. "Class II, Division 2 malocclusion—Nonextraction." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 97, no. 5 (May 1990): 374–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70109-p.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Dhakal, Jyoti. "Comparative Dentoskeletal Study of Class II Division 1 and Class II Division 2 Malocclusion Subjects." Orthodontic Journal of Nepal 1, no. 1 (November 1, 2011): 36–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v1i1.9365.

Full text

Abstract:

The dentoskeletal characteristics of Class II malocclusion subjects were evaluated using cephalometric radiograph and dental cast of 60 untreated patients. The sample included 30 Class II Division 1 and 30 Class II Division 2 malocclusion patients. The inter-canine, inter-premolar, inter-molar, inter-canine alveolar, inter-premolar alveolar, inter-molar alveolar widths are measured on study models. The result showed statistically significant difference between the groups for mandibular inter-canine width only. The cephalometric analysis revealed that SNB angle was responsible for the skeletal sagittal difference between the two groups except for the position of maxillary incisors. No basic difference in dentoskeletal morphology existed between Class II Division 1 and Class II Division 2 malocclusions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Gurstein, Kenneth. "Comments on Class II, Division 2 malocclusion." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 98, no. 6 (December 1990): 18A—19A. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(08)80054-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Krey, Karl-Friedrich, and Karl-Heinz Dannhauer. "Class II division 2 adult orthodontic treatment." international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine 5, no. 4 (August 31, 2012): 177–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12548-012-0059-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Al-Khateeb, Emad A. A., and Susan N. Al-Khateeb. "Anteroposterior and Vertical Components of Class II division 1 and division 2 Malocclusion." Angle Orthodontist 79, no. 5 (September 1, 2009): 859–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/062208-325.1.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Objective: To describe and analyze the skeletal and dental characteristics associated with Class II division 1 (Class II/1) and Class II division 2 (Class II/2) malocclusions in the anteroposterior and vertical dimensions. Materials and Methods: A total of 551 lateral cephalograms were used; 293 films of Class II/1 and 258 films of Class II/2 malocclusions. Lateral cephalographs were traced and analyzed. Parameters for both malocclusions were compared with each other and with the norms calculated for the Jordanian population in another study. Results: The maxilla was prognathic in both malocclusions. The mandible was retrognathic in Class II/1 and orthognathic in Class II/2. Vertically, LAFH was significantly reduced in patients with Class II/2 compared with subjects with Class II/1 who exhibited a significantly increased LAFH. In Class II/1, the lower incisors were proclined and the interincisal angle was reduced, while in Class II/2 the lower incisors were at a normal inclination and the interincisal angle was significantly increased. Conclusions: Class II/2 may be considered as a separate entity which differs in almost all skeletal and dental features from Class I and Class II/1. A Class II skeletal pattern and reduced interincisal angle were common features of Class II/1 malocclusion, while a Class II skeletal pattern, increased interincisal angle, and skeletal deep bite were common features of Class II/2 malocclusion.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Hernández-Orsini, Roberto, and Juan Silva-Coll. "Contemporary Class II Division 2 nonextraction adult treatment." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 153, no. 4 (April 2018): 568–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.12.031.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Peck, Sheldon, and Todd M. Walkow. "Class II Division 2 arch widths: Authors’ response." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 123, no. 6 (June 2003): A17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00385-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Uzuner, Fatma Deniz, Belma Işık Aslan, and Müfide Dinçer. "Dentoskeletal morphology in adults with Class I, Class II Division 1, or Class II Division 2 malocclusion with increased overbite." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 156, no. 2 (August 2019): 248–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.03.006.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

von Bremen, Julia, and Hans Pancherz. "Efficiency of class II division 1 and class II division 2 treatment in relation to different treatment approaches." Seminars in Orthodontics 9, no. 1 (March 2003): 87–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/sodo.2003.34028.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Locks, Arno. "Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with pronounced overbite." Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 17, no. 6 (December 2012): 160–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s2176-94512012000600028.

Full text

Abstract:

Angle Class II, division 2, malocclusion is characterized by a Class II molar relation associated with retroclined or vertical positioning of the upper incisors and in general an overbite. This clinical case was presented to the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics (BBO) as part of the requirements for becoming a BBO Diplomate .

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Tanic, Tatjana, Zorica Blazej, and Vladimir Mitic. "Analysis of soft tissue thickness in persons with malocclusions of class II division 1 and class II division 2." Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo 140, no. 7-8 (2012): 412–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/sarh1208412t.

Full text

Abstract:

Introduction. Different malocclusions indicate different thickness of facial soft tissue. Objective. The aim of the study was to establish the differences in the thickness of facial soft tissue profile in persons with dentoskeletal Class II/1 and II/2 relationship. Methods. In the study we used cephalometric rendgenograms profile analysis of 60 patients aged 12-18 years of the Dental Clinic in Nis who had not previously undergone orthodontical treatment. According to the dentoskeletal jaws relations the patients were divided into two groups with Class II division 1 and Class II class division 2. In all of them the standard dentoskeletal profile analysis by Steiner and soft tissue profile analysis by Burston was done. The obtained findings were statistically analyzed and the comparison between the studied groups was performed. Results. The results indicated the following: in the patients with Class II/1 relationship there was a significantly thinner upper lip (t=5.741; p<0.0001), thinner upper lip sulcus (t=3.858; p<0.001) and significantly thinner lower lip (t=2.009; p<0.05) in relation to the patients with Class II/2. Compensatory effect in the Class II/1 patients was more distinctive in females, as their soft tissue profiles were thicker. In Class II/2 patients this relationship was in favor of males. Conclusion. The facial soft tissue profile indicated significant differences in the thickness dependant on the type of malocclusion and gender. Because of their great variability and a significant participation in the formation of the profile, while planning orthodontic therapy, it is necessary to pay them full attention, with obligatory analysis of the dentoskeletal profile.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Obijou, Claudia, and Hans Pancherz. "Herbst appliance treatment of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 112, no. 3 (September 1997): 287–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70258-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Arvystas, Michael G. "Nonextraction treatment of severe class II, division 2 malocclusions." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 97, no. 6 (June 1990): 510–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(05)80032-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Arvystas, Michael G. "Nonextraction treatment of severe Class II, Division 2 malocclusions." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 99, no. 1 (January 1991): 74–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(05)81683-x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Selwyn-Barnett, B. J. "Rationale of Treatment for Class II Division 2 Malocclusion." British Journal of Orthodontics 18, no. 3 (August 1991): 173–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/bjo.18.3.173.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Demisch, Arthur, Bengt Ingervall, and Urs Thüer. "Mandibular displacement in Angle Class II, Division 2 malocclusion." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 102, no. 6 (December 1992): 509–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70067-k.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Mehta, Nishit, Dolly Patel, Falguni Mehta, Nimesh Patel, Ipist Trivedi, and Apexa Mehta. "Evaluation of arch width among Class I normal occlusion, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2, and Class III malocclusion in Indian population." Contemporary Clinical Dentistry 6, no. 6 (2015): 202. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237x.166842.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Ferreira, Sergio Luis. "Class II Division 2 deep overbite malocclusion correction with nonextraction therapy and Class II elastics." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 114, no. 2 (August 1998): 166–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/od.1998.v114.a87601.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Rock, W. P. "Treatment of Class II malocclusions with removable appliances. Part 2. Class II division 1 treatment." British Dental Journal 168, no. 5 (March 1990): 206–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4807142.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Rock, W. P. "Treatment of Class II malocclusions with removable appliances. Part 4. Class II division 2 treatment." British Dental Journal 168, no. 7 (April 1990): 298–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4807183.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Woodman, A. J. "Treatment of Class II malocclusions with removable appliances. Part 4. Class II division 2 treatment'." British Dental Journal 168, no. 10 (May 1990): 386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4807212.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Eliades, Theodore, and Arden K. Hegdvedt. "Orthodontic-surgical correction of a Class II, Division 2 malocclusion." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 110, no. 4 (October 1996): 351–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70034-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Fooladi, Baharak, Tarryn MacCarthy, Tracy Maloney, and Lokesh Suri. "Category 4: Class II Division 2 malocclusion with deep overbite." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 132, no. 2 (August 2007): 252–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.031.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Faure, Jacques. "Comportement interceptifen Classe II division 2." International Orthodontics 4, no. 3 (September 2006): 261–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1761-7227(06)70246-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Dunglas, Christophe, and Alain Lautrou. "Classe II, division 2, et croissance." Revue d'Orthopédie Dento-Faciale 33, no. 4 (December 1999): 483–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/odf/1999033.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Park, Chong O., and Kwang H. Cho. "Nonextraction treatment of a Class II, Division 1 malocclusion." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 109, no. 3 (March 1996): 227–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70145-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Cureton, Steven L., and Melvin S. Polk. "Class II, Division 1, case with multiple treatment challenges." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 115, no. 2 (February 1999): 148–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70342-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Huth, Joel, Robert Newton Staley, Richard Jacobs, Harold Bigelow, and Jane Jakobsen. "Arch Widths in Class II-2 Adults Compared to Adults with Class II-1 and Normal Occlusion." Angle Orthodontist 77, no. 5 (September 1, 2007): 837–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/062305-209.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Objective: To compare (1) arch widths in adults with Class II division 2 (II-2), Class II division 1 (II-1), and Class I normal occlusions, (2) genders, (3) gender dimorphism, (4) differences between maxillary and mandibular arch widths, and to (5) develop adult norms for arch widths. Materials and Methods: Subjects were white Americans with no history of orthodontic treatment. Arch width dimensions measured were: intercanine, intermolar, and molar alveolar in both arches. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's test were used to compare groups. Results: Comparison of pooled genders showed the II-2 group had maxillary arch widths significantly smaller than the normal occlusions and significantly larger than the II-1 group. All groups had similar mandibular intercanine and alveolar widths. The II-2 and II-1 groups had similar mandibular intermolar widths, both significantly smaller than normal occlusions. The II-2 group had a maxillary/mandibular intermolar difference significantly smaller than the normal occlusions, and significantly less negative than the II-1 group. Gender comparisons in two of six widths showed normal and II-2 male subjects were similar, and in six of six widths normal and II-2 female subjects were similar; in five of six widths II-2 and II-1 male and female subjects were similar. Gender dimorphism occurred in five of six widths in normal occlusions, four of six widths in II-2, and one of six widths in II-1. Conclusions: Arch width dimensions of II-2 subjects were intermediate between normal and II-1 occlusions. In both Class II malocclusions, the process that narrows arch widths was more pronounced in male than in female subjects.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Rana, Md Masud, and Md Zakir Hossain. "A study on Arch Widths of Bangladeshi Adult Subjects with Class II-2 malocclusion compared to those with Class II div1 malocclusion and Normal Occlusion." Bangladesh Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 3, no. 2 (July 4, 2015): 12–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjodfo.v3i2.24006.

Full text

Abstract:

Aim : To evaluate the transverse discrepancy in different malocclusion groups. Also to test the hypothesisvthat models with Class II division 2 malocclusion may have mean maxillary arch widths significantly smaller than those with normal occlusions and significantly larger than those with Class II division 1 malocclusion. Thus the proposed study will generate interest among the orthodontists for further study over the transverse discrepancy of our patients and guide them to establish effective treatment strategy and their management.Methods: This study was a cross sectional study conducted among the dental casts of 150 patients and students of the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Dhaka Dental College and Hospital. Both male and female were included. The first group consists of 50 pair of study models with permanent dentition and diagnosed as Class I (normal) occlusion. The second group includes another 50 pair of dental casts with permanent dentition and diagnosed as Class II division 1 malocclusion . And third group includes another 50 pair of dental casts with permanent dentition and was diagnosed as Class II division 2 malocclusion. This group of malocclusion was again subdivided into two categories, Class II division 2 malocclusion with crowding and Class II division 2 malocclusion without crowding. The Students t test was used to analyze the data. In this analytical test the level of significance p value <0.05 was considered significantResults: No Statistically significant difference was observed in the maxillary inter canine, inter first premolar and inter first molar widths between class-I and Class-II div-1. Significant differences were observed between two groups. In case of mandibular inter first molar widths (p value = 0.001), and also differences in case of mandibular inter canine, inter first premolar and inter first molar widths between Class-I and Class II div 2 malocclusion p value respectively .01, 0.002,0.01.Conclusion: This study helps in determining possible differences in the dental arch widths of Bangladeshi people in Class II div 2 adults compared to adults with Class II div 1 and normal occlusion may be an important aid in further understanding of dentoalveolar characteristics of these conditions, as well as improving their management.Ban J Orthod & Dentofac Orthop, April 2013; Vol-3, No.2

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Patel, Pratik, Ravi Shanthraj, Nekta Garg, Anisha Vallakati, and B. Ashwini. "Treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusion with impacted lower canine." International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation 7, no. 4 (2016): 148. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2349-5243.197464.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Haraguchi, Seiji, and Takashi Yamashiro. "Treatment of adult Class II division 2 patient with metal hypersensitivity." Angle Orthodontist 84, no. 5 (September 2014): 902–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/100613-736.1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Amaral, Beatriz Aguiar do, Heitel Cabral Filho, João Paulo da Silva-Neto, Maria da Glória Almeida Martins, and Kenio Costa de Lima. "Angle Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion and Association with Late Eruption." Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada 19, no. 1 (2019): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.4034/pboci.2019.191.16.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Walkow, Todd M., and Sheldon Peck. "Dental arch width in Class II Division 2 deep-bite malocclusion." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 122, no. 6 (December 2002): 608–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.129189.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Goldstein, Benjamin J., and Analia Veitz-Keenan. "Extraction or non-extraction treatment for Class II division 2 malocclusion?" Evidence-Based Dentistry 19, no. 3 (October 2018): 88–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401329.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Selwyn-Barnett, B. J. "Class II/Division 2 Malocclusion: A Method of Planning and Treatment." British Journal of Orthodontics 23, no. 1 (February 1996): 29–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/bjo.23.1.29.

Full text

Abstract:

This paper presents a method of cephalometric treatment planning for class II division 2 malocclusions. The method combines improvement in dental facial aesthetics, with reduction in overbite and inter-incisor angle. An individual case is illustrated; examples of the applications commonly used being shown in the treatment of an adolescent patient.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Eberhard, Harald, and Ursula Hirschfelder. "Treatment of Class II, division 2 in the late growth period." Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthop�die 59, no. 6 (November 1998): 352–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01299771.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Low, Laura E., Theodore E. Moore, Kevin R. Austin, Richard G. Burton, Steve D. Marshall, Karin A. Southard, and Thomas E. Southard. "Mandibular “tripod” advancement of a Class II Division 2 deepbite malocclusion." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 137, no. 2 (February 2010): 285–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.063.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Othman, Rawand J., and Hiwa S. Khidir. "Differences in Dental Arch Dimensions in a Sample of Kurdish Population among Different Occlusal Categories." Polytechnic Journal 10, no. 1 (June 30, 2020): 51–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.25156/ptj.v10n1y2020.pp51-55.

Full text

Abstract:

It is essential to know dental arch dimensions to provide accurate diagnosis and treatment planning to ensure the satisfactory outcome of orthodontic treatment. The aim of the present study was to measure and compare dental arch dimensions of a Kurdish sample in Erbil city with normal and different classes of malocclusion. Arch width and length were measured by an electronic digital caliper on a total of 150 orthodontic models of school students aged 16–20 years of different occlusal relationships (Class I normal occlusion, Class I, Class II division I, Class II Division II, and Class III malocclusions). The results showed that (1) girls have smaller arch parameters than boys; (2) Class II division II malocclusion showed a significantly smaller upper inter canine width, arch length, incisor molar distance, and incisor canine distance when compared to all other groups; (3) the upper inter premolar and inter molar width were significantly narrower in Class II division I malocclusion than of normal occlusions and Class III malocclusion and also narrower in Class I malocclusion than in normal occlusions for both arches; (4) the arch length was significantly longer in Class II division I when compared to Class II division II, Class I malocclusions (P < 0.01), Class III malocclusion and Class I normal occlusion (P < 0.05), and (5) no statistically significant differences were found in all the arch dimensions for Class III malocclusion when compared with the normal occlusion. In conclusion, girls had smaller arch dimension than boys and Class II Division II malocclusion showed smaller arch in all dimensions while Class II division I malocclusion revealed narrower arch width and longer arch length.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Minch, Liwia. "Class II division 2 nonextraction treatment using skeletal anchorage – a case report." Orthodontic Forum 15, no. 2 (2020): 170–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/for.2020.97342.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Ngan, Peter W., Ewa Byczek, and John Scheick. "Longitudinal evaluation of growth changesin class II division 1 subjects." Seminars in Orthodontics 3, no. 4 (December 1997): 222–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1073-8746(97)80055-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Shrestha, Situ L., Supreeth S. Manipal, Bikash V. Shrestha, and Alok K. Jaiswal. "Correction of Class II Division 2 Deepbite Malocclusion with Non-extraction Therapy." Orthodontic Journal of Nepal 3, no. 1 (December 6, 2013): 73–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v3i1.9287.

Full text

Abstract:

The article presents a case report of a teen age girl with Class II Division 2 malocclusion with deep over bite. The case was treated on non-extraction basis using 0.018 pre-adjusted edgewise appliance with anterior bite plate (monobloc) to correct deep bite and forward placement of the mandible. Use of Class II elastics helped to achieve Class I canine and molar retention. Treatment was completed in 22 months with good occlusion and facial esthetics. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v3i1.9287 Orthodontic Journal of Nepal, Vol.3, No.1, 2013: 73-75

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Biswas, Ashis Kumar, Gazi Shamim Hassan, Nasreen Akhter, Ranjit Ghosh, and Mohammad Rakibul Islam Babu. "A Study on Arch Length Among Dentoalveolar Class I, Class II and Class III Malocclusion of Bangladeshi Population." City Dental College Journal 9, no. 1 (September 7, 2012): 1–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/cdcj.v9i1.11827.

Full text

Abstract:

Objectives : To study the variations in arch length among different classes of dento-alveolar malocclusion in the permanent dentition. Materials and Methods: Both male and female Bangladeshi subjects with permanent dentition who attended during 1st July 2007 to 1st January 2011 to the Department of Orthodontics, BSMMU for treatment were included in this study. Dental arch length were measured from dental casts of the permanent dentition of 96 Bangladeshi subjects of which 48 male, 48 female, 24 class 1, 24 class 2 div. I, 24 class 2 div. II, 24 class III. Arch length was measured by adapting a length of brass wire (diameter 0.5 mm) on the maxillary and mandibular arches. Comparison of arch length was done among different malocclusion classes. Results: In these study we found maxillary arch length was largest in class II div. 1 malocclusion. Mandibular arch length was highest in class III and lowest in class II div. 1 malocclusion. Least significant difference (LSD) is used to compare two of the four group. P<0.05 was set as the level of significance. Conclusions : Class III malocclusion has large lower arch and short upper arch. In Class II division 1, arch length is larger in upper than lower arch and Class II division 2 show the shortest maxillary arch length.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/cdcj.v9i1.11827 City Dental College Journal Vol.9(1) 2012 1-3

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Vaughan, Janet L. "Orthodontic correction of an adult Angle Class II Division 2 deep bite." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 116, no. 1 (July 1999): 75–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70305-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Barbosa, Luiz A. G., Eustaquio Araujo, Rolf G. Behrents, and Peter H. Buschang. "Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 151, no. 5 (May 2017): 914–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.10.026.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Devreese, H., G. De Pauw, G. Van Maele, A. Kuijpers-Jagtman, and L. Dermaut. "Stability of upper incisor inclination changes in Class II division 2 patients." European Journal of Orthodontics 29, no. 3 (May 4, 2007): 314–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm011.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Binda, S. K. R., A. M. Kuijpers-Jagtman, J. K. M. Maertens, and M. A. van't Hof. "A long-term cephalometric evaluation of treated Class II division 2 malocclusions." European Journal of Orthodontics 16, no. 4 (August 1, 1994): 301–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/16.4.301.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Yousefian, Joseph, Douglas Trimble, and Gary Folkman. "A new look at the treatment of Class II Division 2 malocclusions." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 130, no. 6 (December 2006): 771–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.016.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Bock, N. C., and S. Ruf. "Class II division 2 treatment—does skeletal maturity influence success and stability?" Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 74, no. 3 (May 2013): 187–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-013-0139-y.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Mariano Pereira, Pedro, Afonso Pinhão Ferreira, Purificação Tavares, and Ana Cristina Braga. "Different manifestations of Class II Division 2 incisor retroclination: A morphologic study." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 143, no. 3 (March 2013): 310–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.021.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Islam, MM, and MZ Hossain. "A Comparative Study of Arch Widths of Bangladeshi Subject with Normal Occlusion and Class II Division 1 Malocclusion." Bangladesh Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2, no. 2 (August 13, 2013): 18–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjodfo.v2i2.16159.

Full text

Abstract:

Aim: To evaluate possible differences of the upper and lower dental arches width among youths with Class I,normal occlusion and Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Materials and Methods: The evaluation was conducted on 100 pairs of dental casts of Bangladeshi youths with permanent dentition, 50 with Class I, normal occlusion (22 males and 28 females) at the mean age of 19±3 years and 50 with Class II, division 1, malocclusion (18 males and 32 females ) at the mean age of 20±4 years. The group with Class II malocclusion was divided into two categories: Class II without dental crowding and Class II with dental crowding. A comparison was made between the intercanine inter first premolar and intermolar widths of both dental arches. Results: Subjects with Class II, division, 1 malocclusion when compared with Class I normal occlusion presented (a) in the upper dental arch , smaller intermolar, interpremolar and intercanine width. (b) in the lower dental arch , smaller intermolar width. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjodfo.v2i2.16159 Ban J Orthod & Dentofac Orthop, April 2012; Vol-2, No.2, 18-23

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!