Academic literature on the topic 'Classification of Communicators with Aphasia'

Fifteen children and adolescents with a history of acquired aphasia were administered a battery of language and academic tests, 1–10 years postonset. As a group, these children performed significantly more poorly than non-brain-injured subjects on the language measures, with deficits in word, sentence, and paragraph comprehension; naming; oral production of complex syntactic constructions; and word fluency. One particular language deficit or cluster of deficits did not characterize the group as a whole. For individual brain-injured subjects, language deficits ranged from no or only mild impairment to significant language deficits. All brain-injured subjects were functional verbal communicators at the time of the study; that is, all were oral and primarily used grammatical sentences as their means of communication. Academic difficulties were characteristic of this population. Two thirds of the brain-injured group were receiving academic assistance of some kind at the time of the study. Poor performance on arithmetic calculations was typical. The brain-injured group was heterogeneous with regard to age at onset, etiology, extent of damage, length of recovery, and outcome profiles. Careful and comprehensive assessment of a range of language and academic abilities is essential to adequately identify needs and appropriate intervention strategies for this population.

The present theoretical study aims to make an incursion into the history of description, definition and conceptualization of aphasia. Old and modern opinions on the etiology and symptomatology of aphasia are presented. Also, the types of aphasia and their prognosis are described.

The present theoretical study aims to make an incursion into the history of description, definition and conceptualization of aphasia. Old and modern opinions on the etiology and symptomatology of aphasia are presented. Also, the types of aphasia and their prognosis are described.

Abstract Aphasia is an acquired impairment in the production or comprehension of language, typically caused by left hemisphere stroke. The subtyping framework used in clinical aphasiology today is based on the Wernicke-Lichtheim model of aphasia formulated in the late 19th century, which emphasizes the distinction between language production and comprehension. The current study used a data-driven approach that combined modern statistical, machine learning, and neuroimaging tools to examine behavioural deficit profiles and their lesion correlates and predictors in a large cohort of individuals with post-stroke aphasia. First, individuals with aphasia were clustered based on their behavioural deficit profiles using community detection analysis (CDA) and these clusters were compared with the traditional aphasia subtypes. Random forest classifiers were built to evaluate how well individual lesion profiles predict cluster membership. The results of the CDA analyses did not align with the traditional model of aphasia in either behavioural or neuroanatomical patterns. Instead, the results suggested that the primary distinction in aphasia (after severity) is between phonological and semantic processing rather than between production and comprehension. Further, lesion-based classification reached 75% accuracy for the CDA-based categories and only 60% for categories based on the traditional fluent/non-fluent aphasia distinction. The results of this study provide a data-driven basis for a new approach to classification of post-stroke aphasia subtypes in both research and clinical settings.

Purpose The primary aim was to examine the utility of the Western Aphasia Battery–Revised (WAB-R; Kertesz, 2007 ) for classifying variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA). Traditional WAB-R metrics of Aphasia Quotient (AQ), subtest scores, WAB-R classification, and several novel metrics were examined. A secondary aim was to examine these same WAB-R metrics in individuals with primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS). Method A retrospective analysis of WAB-R records from 169 participants enrolled in a study of neurodegenerative speech and language disorders was conducted. PPA/PPAOS classification was determined by consensus review of speech, language, and cognitive profiles. Scores on each of the WAB-R subtests were obtained to derive AQ, WAB-R aphasia profile, and 3 ratios reflecting relative performance on subtests. Results Mean AQ was significantly higher in the PPAOS group compared to all PPA variants except primary fluent aphasia. AQ above the normal cutoff was observed for 20% of participants with PPA. Significant main effects of group were noted for each of the subtests. Follow-up comparisons most frequently discriminated PPAOS, primary agrammatic aphasia (PAA), and logopenic progressive aphasia. Primary fluent aphasia and semantic dementia (SD) subtest scores were less distinctive, with the exception of Naming for SD, which was significantly lower than for PAA and PPAOS. When the WAB-R AQ detected aphasia, a classification of anomic aphasia was most frequently observed; this pattern held true for each of the PPA variants. The mean Information Content:Naming ratio was highest for SD, and the mean Comprehension:Fluency ratio was highest for PAA. Conclusions In the current study, AQ underestimated the presence of PPA and WAB-R classification did not distinguish among PPA classification determined by consensus. Performance on individual subtests and relative performance across subtests demonstrated inconsistent alignment with PPA classification. We conclude the WAB-R in isolation is inadequate to detect or characterize PPA. We instead suggest utilizing the WAB-R as 1 component of a comprehensive language and motor speech assessment when PPA is suspected.

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is classified into three variants, logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA), nonfluent agrammatic PPA (nfaPPA), and semantic variant PPA (svPPA), based on clinical (syndromic) characteristics with support from neuroimaging and/or underlying neuropathology. Classification of PPA variants provides information valuable to disease management. International consensus criteria are widely employed to identify PPA subtypes; however, classification is complex, and some individuals do not fit neatly into the subtyping scheme. In this review, diagnostic challenges and their implications are discussed, possible explanations for these challenges are explored, and approaches to address PPA classification are considered.

Personer med afasi lider ofta av sina språkliga svårigheter och upplever dem som ett allvarligt problem. När förmågan till effektiv kommunikation genom talat språk inte räcker till kan ett Alternativt och Kompletterande Kommunikationssätt (AKK) behövas. Det möjliggör att personen, förutom med tal, kommunicerar med till exempel bilder, gester eller tecken. Proceduren att välja ett passande AKK är komplicerad och det händer att ett hjälpmedel som inte passar individens behov sätts in av logoped, eller att ett hjälpmedel inte sätts in alls. För att utveckla och förbättra möjligheten att avgöra om och i så fall vilket hjälpmedel som bör användas har Lasker och Garrett utvecklat bedömningsverktyget The Multimodal Communication Screening Test for persons with Aphasia (MCST-A). Denna studies huvudsyfte var att översätta MCST-A till svenska. Studien delades upp i tre delar; 1) översättning och anpassning av MCST-A till svenska, 2) prövning av översättningen på personer utan afasi samt 3) en första testning på personer med måttlig till grav kronisk afasi där deras resultat på MCST-A jämfördes med en skattning av deras förmåga att kommunicera med AKK i vardagen. Översättningen och anpassningen ledde till en fungerande version på svenska. Resultatet från testningen på personer med afasi går i linje med tidigare forskning, där resultatet på MCST-A speglar personers skattade förmåga att kommunicera med AKK i vardagen. MCST-A kan således vara ett användbart instrument för att avgöra om och på vilken nivå ett hjälpmedel kan användas av en person med afasi. Det är dock inte möjligt att dra en generaliserbar slutsats utifrån denna studies resultat då urvalet var begränsat.
Individuals with aphasia often suffer from their language difficulties and experience them as a serious problem. When the ability to communicate effectively through spoken language is insufficient, an Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) may be required. This allows the person, in addition to speech, to communicate with for example pictures, gestures or body language. The procedure for choosing a suitable AAC is complicated, sometimes an aid that doesn’t suit the needs of the individual is provided by speech-language pathologists and sometimes an aid isn’t provided at all. In order to develop and improve the ability to determine if and what aids should be used, Garrett and Lasker developed the assessment tool The Multimodal Communication Screening Test for Individuals with Aphasia (MCST-A). The main purpose of this study was to translate MCST-A into Swedish. The study was divided into three parts; 1) translation and adaptation of MCST-A to Swedish, 2) testing the translation on persons without aphasia, and 3) a first test on persons with moderate to severe chronic aphasia, where their results on MCST-A were compared with an estimate of their ability to communicate with AAC in daily life. The translation and adaptation led to a working version in Swedish. The results from the persons with aphasia is in line with previous research, where the results on MCST-A reflects the estimated ability to communicate with AAC in their daily lives. Thus, MCST-A can be a useful tool to determine whether if and on what level aids can be used by a person with aphasia. However, it’s not possible to draw a generalizable conclusion based on the results of this study as the sample was small.

La prise en charge de l’aphasie en phase aiguë de l’accident vasculaire cérébral a été au centre de mon activité d’orthophoniste à l’assistance publique pendant 20 ans. Au cours de ces années, j’ai pu développer une activité de recherche en parallèle de mon activité clinique. En particulier, je me suis intéressée à l’évaluation et à la prise en charge très précoce de l’aphasie dans le contexte d’AVC en phase très aiguë. Un outil d’évaluation de l’aphasie a pu être élaboré dans le service, et a ensuite été le centre de plusieurs travaux : son adaptation dans d’autres langues, la comparaison de l’aphasie et le l’hémiplégie, la détermination de profils aphasiologiques types… Le champ de l’aphasiologie est très vaste et il reste de nombreux axes de recherche à approfondir. Notre outil d’évaluation de phase aiguë pourrait participer à apporter la preuve du bénéfice d’une prise en charge précoce de l’aphasie, et pourrait également permettre de proposer une nouvelle classification des aphasies
The management of aphasia in the acute phase of stroke has been the focus of my speech therapist activity in a public hospital for 20 years. During these years I have been able to develop a research activity in parallel with my clinical activity. In particular, I was interested in the assessment and the treatment of aphasia in the context of the very acute phase of stroke. An assessment tool for aphasia has been developed in the stroke unit, and was then the center of several studies: its adaptation into other languages, the comparison of aphasia and hemiplegia, determining aphasiological profiles kinds...The field of aphasiology is very broad and there are still many areas of research to pursue. Our screening tool of aphasia could participate to prove the benefit of an early treatment of aphasia, and could also allow proposing a new classification of aphasia

Introdução: A deglutição e suas características principais ainda são desconhecidas na demência frontotemporal. Objetivos: Caracterizar a deglutição e o comportamento alimentar de pacientes com diagnóstico de demência frontotemporal que apresentam a variante comportamental (DFTvc) e a afasia progressiva primária (APP). Caracterizar os pacientes com DFT e seus cuidadores. Descrever aspectos cognitivos e comportamentais, funcionalidade global, comunicação funcional, e a funcionalidade da deglutição na DFT. Descrever os problemas de deglutição e do comportamento alimentar na DFTvc e APP. Correlacionar os aspectos cognitivos e comportamentais, funcionalidade global e a comunicação com as características da deglutição. Identificar fatores preditivos da piora da funcionalidade da deglutição e do comportamento alimentar na DFT. Avaliar o comportamento dos instrumentos empregados. Desenvolver a versão reduzida do Questionário de Habilidades de Alimentação e Deglutição nas Demências e do Questionário de Comunicação Funcional na Afasia. Método: Este estudo incluiu 46 indivíduos com DFT nas fases leve, moderada e grave, e seus 46 cuidadores. O Mini exame do estado mental (MEEM) e o Mini exame do estado mental grave (MEEM-g) foram usados para avaliar os aspectos cognitivos. A Escala de estadiamento da demência (CDR-DLFT) foi usada para confirmar a fase da doença. O Inventário Neuropsiquiátrico (INP) foi aplicado para investigar os problemas comportamentais. A Bateria de Avaliação Frontal (BAF) investigou as funções executivas. O Índice das Atividades de Vida Diária (Katz), Questionário para Avaliação da Comunicação Funcional na Afasia (QACFA) e a Escala de funcionalidade da deglutição (EFD) avaliaram as habilidades funcionais. O Questionário de Habilidades de Alimentação e Deglutição nas Demências (QHADD) avaliou as dificuldades na deglutição e alimentação. Resultados: Os grupos DFTvc e APP não mostraram diferença estatisticamente significante no MEEM, CDR e BAF. Os cuidadores dos pacientes com DFTvc apresentaram mais horas de cuidado por dia em comparação aos pacientes com APP (p<0,05). Os grupos diferiram na EFD (p < 0,05). As características comportamentais que foram significantes na comparação entre os grupos DFTvc e APP foram: delírio, desinibição, comportamento motor aberrante e distúrbios do sono(p < 0,05) e alucinação (p=0,01). Os pacientes com DFTvc tiveram mais problemas de deglutição do que os pacientes com APP, tais como: tosse e engasgos, dificuldade com alguma consistência alimentar e dificuldade com alimento específico. Os problemas de deglutição na DFTvc se correlacionaram com a funcionalidade, aspectos cognitivos (p < 0,05), com a função executiva e com o comportamento (p < 0,01). Na APP, o subtipo semântico apresentou mais problemas de deglutição, tais como: escape de saliva e comida da boca, múltiplas deglutições, atraso na iniciação da deglutição e engasgos, estas características se correlacionaram com a ansiedade (p < 0,01), apatia e comportamento motor aberrante (p=0,01). Os problemas do comportamento alimentar foram mais frequentes no subtipo logopênico e se correlacionaram com dificuldades de comunicação. Os principais fatores preditivos da piora da funcionalidade da deglutição foram: declínio funcional, alterações comportamentais e o comprometimento da comunicação. Os problemas de deglutição foram observados em todas as fases da demência. A BAF foi o único instrumento que não apresentou uma boa confiabilidade interna. Conclusão: Problemas na deglutição foram observados nas duas variantes desde os estágios iniciais da demência. As alterações comportamentais, cognitivas e funcionais, e dificuldades na comunicação comprometeram as fases antecipatória e preparatória oral da deglutição. Por causa destas alterações, os cuidadores tiveram dificuldade no gerenciamento da situação de alimentação. Nosso estudo desenvolveu questionários resumidos para avaliar a deglutição e a comunicação funcional
Introduction: Swallowing and its main characteristics are still unknown in frontotemporal dementia. Objectives: To characterize swallowing and feeding behavior of patients with frontotemporal dementia who have behavioral variant (bvFTD) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA). To characterize patients with FTD and their caregivers.To describe cognitive and behavioral aspects, functionalstatus, functional communication, and swallowing function in FTD.To describe swallowing problems and feeding behavior in bvFTD and PPA. To correlate cognitive and behavioral aspects, functional status, and communication with swallowing. To identify predictive factors associated with worsening of functionality of swallowing and feeding behavior in FTD. To evaluate the instruments used. To develop reduced versions of: \"Assessment of Feeding and Swallowing Difficulties in Dementia\" and \"Functional Outcome Questionnaire Aphasia\". Method: This study included 46 individuals with FTD in mild, moderate and severe phases, and their 46 caregivers. The Mini mental state examination (MMSE) and the Severe Mini mental state examination (SMMSE) were used to assess the cognitive aspects. The FTLD-modified Clinical Dementia Rating scale (FTLD-CDR) was used to confirm the stage of the disease. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) was applied to investigate the behavioral problems. The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) investigated executive functions. The Index of Activities of Daily Living (Katz), Functional Outcome Questionnaire- Aphasia and Swallowing rating scale (SRE) evaluated the functional abilities. The Assessment of Feeding and Swallowing Difficulties in Dementia (QHADD) evaluated the difficulties in swallowing and feeding. Results: bvFTD and PPA groups showed no statistically significant difference in MMSE, CDR and FAB. Caregivers of patients with bvFTD had more hours of care per day compared to patients with PPA (p < 0.05). The groups differed in SRE (p < 0.05). The behavioral characteristics that were significant in the comparison between bvFTD and PPA groups were delirium, disinhibition, aberrant motor behavior and sleep disturbances (p < 0.05), and hallucinations (p = 0.01). Patients with bvFTD had more swallowing problems than patients with PPA, such as coughing and choking, difficulty with some food consistency and difficulty with specific food. Swallowing problems in bvFTD correlated with functionality, with the cognitive aspects (p < 0.05), with executive function and behavior (p < 0.01). In PPA, the semantic subtype showed more swallowing problems such as escape of saliva and food in mouth, multiple swallows, delay in initiation of swallowing and choking, these characteristics correlated with anxiety (p < 0.01), apathy and aberrant motor behavior (p = 0.01). The problems of feeding behavior were more frequent in logopenic subtype and correlated with communication difficulties. The major predictors of worsening of swallowing function were: functional decline, behavioral changes and impaired communication. Swallowing problems were observed at all stages of dementia. The BAF was the only instrument that had bad internal reliability. Conclusion: Swallowing problems were observed in the two variants from the early stages of dementia. Behavioral, cognitive and functional changes, and difficulties in communication compromised the anticipatory and oral preparatory phase of swallowing. Because of these changes, caregivers had difficulty in managing the feeding situation. Our study developed reduced versions of questionnaires to assess swallowing and functional communication

For two decades, researchers and clinicians have been using the diagnostic criteria for FTD to generally diagnose a patient as suffering from PPA and the criteria of Neary et al. (1998) to further specify the diagnosis as progressive nonfluent aphasia or semantic dementia. However, there were a number of PPA cases that could not be classified according to the criteria of Neary and colleagues, which led to a revision of the diagnostic clinical and research criteria for PPA by Gorno-Tempini et al. (2011). The revised criteria encompass three PPA variants (svPPA, nfvPPA, and lvPPA) with three stages characterized by increasing evidence: clinical diagnosis, imaging-supported diagnosis, and diagnosis with definite pathology. As compared to the previous diagnostic criteria, more emphasis is placed on imaging markers as supportive features. These imaging criteria were however proposed based on a purely qualitative evaluation of the literature and have not been validated so far. The aim of this thesis was to quantitatively evaluate the validity of the new diagnostic imaging criteria for PPA variants using anatomical likelihood meta-analyses (study 1) and to investigate the usefulness of these imaging criteria for the individual diagnosis of PPA patients in clinical routine using support vector machine classification (study 2).

Cerebrovascular disease is a leading cause of disability and death worldwide, with about one third of stroke survivors initially suffering from communication disorders, including aphasia. Symptoms in aphasia vary from person to person, ranging from repeated failures in verbal expression to comprehension deficits that may occur in both the spoken and written modality. The current work synthesizes almost a decade of research on aphasia following left-hemispheric stroke in individuals with preserved right-hemispheric function: musical skills and formulaic expressions embedded in social interaction. Moving beyond the traditional scope of clinical linguistics, this work argues that preserved right-hemispheric function not only provides valuable resources in speech-language therapy, but also a possible foundation for psychotherapy in individuals with post-stroke aphasia and concomitant depression. An integrative summary introduces key developments in a line of research spanning from 2013 to 2021, to conclude with an outlook on forthcoming contributions and a commentary on the underlying conceptual framework. Each separate piece of research has been published previously in peer-reviewed journals. Here, the selected studies are assembled in an interdisciplinary context at the intersection of clinical neuroscience, speech-language pathology, and psychotherapy.

Theoretically grounded aphasia assessment that matches clinical practice settings is critical to planning intervention and assisting individuals with aphasia and their family members. This chapter begins with an overview of aphasia assessment in three historical periods: clinical description prior to 1935, standardized testing into the 1960s, and the postmodern era of multifaceted assessment. Topics in this section include aphasia classification; screening; assessing specific linguistic ability, functional communication, and quality of life; and assessment within cognitive neuropsychological and information-processing models. The second section describes contemporary assessment practices including the purpose and models of assessment, personal and environmental factors influencing assessment decisions, assessing conversation and connected speech, and related assessment areas such as cognition, executive function, and emotional state. Finally, emerging trends in assessment are discussed including evidence-based practice, treatment candidacy and prognosis, psychosocial models of assessment, and telehealth. Successful aphasia assessment should be a principled, systematic, and dynamic component of managing and living with aphasia.

Psychosocial problems are one of the major issues seen in persons with aphasia (PWA), but the severity of these psychosocial problems vary depending upon age, socioeconomic status, nature of job pre-morbidly, family support, emotional factors, and quality of life. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) by World Health Organization in the field of communication disorders, specifically for aphasia and other neurogenic communication disorders, provided clear guidelines and information about the importance of assessment and treatment of PWA in terms of body functions and structures, activities and participation, and environmental and personal factors affecting the quality of life in these individuals. The present chapter is primarily focused on studying the psychosocial aspects in PWA, specifically the quality of life and other psychosocial disturbances in the Indian context.

Nosological classification of organic dementia is based on current knowledge and theories of aetiology, including genetics, clinical picture, the pathological substrate, and the predominant location of brain damage. This chapter is concerned with dementia syndromes caused by a degenerative disease primarily affecting the frontal and temporal lobes, named frontal-lobe dementia or frontotemporal dementia (FTD). The terminology should be viewed from a historical perspective. The relationship between localized cortical atrophy in dementia and symptoms of aphasia was first reported by Pick in 1892. The pathological account of this lobar degeneration by Alzheimer in 1911 described ‘ballooned’ neurones (Pick cells) and argentophilic globes (Pick bodies), and the clinicopathological entity was named Pick's disease. In the 1980s, attention was drawn to a larger group of frontal-lobe dementias associated with frontotemporal cortical degeneration. The Lund–Manchester consensus of 1994 delineated the prototypical clinical syndrome of FTD with three neuropathological constituents, frontal lobe degeneration of non-Alzheimer type (FLD), (alternatively designated ‘dementia lacking distinctive histology’), Pick's disease, and motor neurone disease (MND) with dementia (FTD-MND). The 1998 consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) encompassed two additional dementia syndromes; progressive non-fluent aphasia (PA), and semantic dementia. Corticobasal degeneration (CBD) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) have also been associated with FTLD. A changing clinical classification is shown in Fig. 4.1.3.1. The addition of important genetic and histochemical characteristics has further added to the complex classification of FTD and FTLD with a risk of developing numerous and partly competing definitions. FTLD may be further subclassified into forms positive or negative for tau and ubiquitin. The ubiquitinated form will be referred to as FTD-U, which is synonymous to FLTD-U.

This chapter covers the classification of acquired aphasic syndromes. It illustrates some of the speech errors aphasic stroke patients make with videos of a patient describing a picture and attempting to repeat words. The main part of the chapter assesses the evidencebase for speech and language therapy (SALT) and answers the following questions: Does SALT work? What is the correct dose and intensity? And is it ever too late for SALT intervention? We then discuss two main adjuvants to SALT:one old—drug therapy; one new—non-invasive brain stimulation. Finally, we examine the role for e-rehabilitation and augmentative aids before asking what the future might hold for aphasia therapy, and wondering if it might already be here.

This chapter covers the classification of acquired aphasic syndromes. It illustrates some of the speech errors aphasic stroke patients make with videos of a patient describing a picture and attempting to repeat words. The main part of the chapter assesses the evidence base for speech and language therapy (SALT) and answers the following questions: Does SALT work? What is the correct dose and intensity? And is it ever too late for SALT intervention? We then discuss two main adjuvants to SALT: one old—drug therapy; one new—non-invasive brain stimulation. Finally, we examine the role for e-rehabilitation and augmentative aids before asking what the future might hold for aphasia therapy, and wondering if it might already be here.

‘Communication disorders after stroke’ examines the common communication disorders which occur post-stroke and their impact on all aspects of daily life for the older person. It describes impairments of language and speech: aphasia, dysarthria, and apraxia of speech, outlining the theoretical models underpinning assessment and treatment, with specific reference to auditory comprehension, reading, the production of spoken language and spelling. The International Classification of Functioning framework which guides the assessment and rehabilitation of communication disorders, and the methods used to assess breakdown of communication are detailed. The role of the speech and language therapist is explored. The impact of spontaneous recovery and the internal and external factors which impact on suitability for therapy are described. The role of collaborative goal setting is outlined and intervention approaches targeted at the level of the impairment and at increasing communicative activity and social and life participation are explored. The impact of digital literacy, health-related quality of life, and the challenges of the care home setting on the older population are also examined.

Luria’s interpretation of brain organization for language and aphasia is analyzed. He published two major books and a myriad of papers devoted to this topic. Luria is one of the major founders of contemporary aphasiology, as from the fundamental point of view as from the clinical perspective. His significant influence has continued during the 21st century. Many of Luria’s ideas have been integrated into contemporary aphasiology. His aphasia classification, however, remains partially controversial.