Academic literature on the topic 'Clean energy investment'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Clean energy investment.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Clean energy investment"
Ngwakwe, Collins C. "The Effect of Clean Energy Financial Investment on Carbon Reduction." Oblik i finansi, no. 1(103) (2024): 49–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.33146/2307-9878-2024-1(103)-49-53.
Full textPaolillo, William, Benjamin Cross, Charles Zelek, Donald Wingate, and Adam Berkebile. "Clean innovation ecosystems: Lifting distressed communities in Appalachia with clean energy." F1000Research 13 (July 17, 2024): 808. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.150557.1.
Full textPreston, John T., and Bryan L. Martel. "Investment Opportunities in Clean Energy." CFA Institute Conference Proceedings Quarterly 25, no. 1 (March 2008): 5–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2469/cp.v25.n1.3.
Full textMa, Chao. "DEA Model Construction and Investment Efficiency Analysis of Overseas Electric Power Market in Clean Energy." E3S Web of Conferences 267 (2021): 01008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126701008.
Full textBumpus, A., and S. Comello. "Emerging clean energy technology investment trends." Nature Climate Change 7, no. 6 (May 31, 2017): 382–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3306.
Full textKirkpatrick, A. Justin, and Lori S. Bennear. "Promoting clean energy investment: An empirical analysis of property assessed clean energy." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 68, no. 2 (September 2014): 357–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.05.001.
Full textAzarova, Ekaterina, and Hannah Jun. "Investigating Determinants of International Clean Energy Investments in Emerging Markets." Sustainability 13, no. 21 (October 26, 2021): 11843. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su132111843.
Full textKnight, Eric. "The Economic Geography of Financing Clean Energy Technologies." Competition & Change 16, no. 2 (April 2012): 77–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1024529412z.0000000009.
Full textOlaniyi, Eunice O., Sina Atari, and Gunnar Prause. "Maritime Energy Contracting for Clean Shipping." Transport and Telecommunication Journal 19, no. 1 (March 1, 2018): 31–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2018-0004.
Full textDaim, Tugrul, Gulgun Kayakutlu, Yulianto Suharto, and Yagmur Bayram. "Clean energy investment scenarios using the Bayesian network." International Journal of Sustainable Energy 33, no. 2 (November 27, 2012): 400–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2012.744311.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Clean energy investment"
Bürer, Mary Jean. "Public Policy and Clean Energy Private Equity Investment." kostenfrei, 2008. http://www.biblio.unisg.ch/www/edis.nsf/wwwDisplayIdentifier/3421.
Full textChapman, S. M. "'Good' carbon governance : a multilevel and comparative perspective of clean energy investment through the clean development mechanism." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2011. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.597470.
Full textHarrison, Jessica (Jessica Kit). "Clean energy investments in an uncertain future." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34520.
Full textIncludes bibliographical references.
The energy sector faces a multitude of challenges related to climate change and energy security. These challenges will likely prompt considerable changes in the coming decades, including significant investment and new market design. To help fulfill multiple goals and limit the necessary tradeoffs among them, industry and policymakers alike are looking to new technologies. However, uncertainty regarding the challenges, the solutions, and the behavior of the energy system, make it difficult to discern which investment is right for what time. This thesis reviews the potential changes in today's energy system and examines the difficulties of addressing challenges that appear urgent yet elusive. An extensive literature review considers the problems of clean energy investment decision-making in modern energy systems, and evaluates the potential contributions of a real options approach and system dynamics. A case study on the market growth of Gas-to-Liquids technology provides more detail on the use of system dynamics to gauge market uncertainties. Admitting to the lack of appropriate tools to objectively evaluate strategies for tackling today's energy challenges, this thesis helps answer why such questions as the appropriate timing investment are so difficult to answer, and contentious.
(cont.) Ultimately, it suggests a framework for considering the problem of clean energy investments under uncertainty. It considers a real options approach and system dynamics, despite their limitations, as a start for developing sophisticated tools to help grapple with investment uncertainties and to create thoughtful, strategic plans.
by Jessica Harrison.
S.M.
Arnesson, Daniel. "Subsidizing Global Solar Power : A contemporary legal study of existing and potential international incentives for solar PV investments in developing countries." Thesis, Örebro universitet, Institutionen för juridik, psykologi och socialt arbete, 2013. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-28555.
Full textKraska, Bernhard-Michael. "Exiting Clean Energy Venture Capital Investments IPO vs. Trade Sale /." St. Gallen, 2007. http://www.biblio.unisg.ch/org/biblio/edoc.nsf/wwwDisplayIdentifier/00646158002/$FILE/00646158002.pdf.
Full textDzenga, Bruce. "Public policy and clean energy venture capital private equity investments in South Africa." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/97395.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: In 2007, Bürer and Wüstenhagen (2009) conducted a survey amongst European and United States venture capital and private equity investors (VC/PE) to ascertain their public clean energy policy preference and concluded that VC/PE investors view the feed-in tariff (FIT) scheme to be the most preferred policy option. In this research study, the author re-conducted part of the Bürer and Wüstenhagen (2009) survey with thirty South African VC/PE investors to determine their perceptions on clean energy public policy preference. It is evident from the survey, that opinions are varied and at times even contradictory. This in itself demonstrates an important feature of the South African VC/PE and clean energy industry: it is young, dynamic, changing rapidly and can look very different, depending on the vantage point. The investors surveyed were mainly optimistic about the long-term development of the South African renewable energy industry led by private investors. VC/PE investors in South Africa have mixed views on various investment options, and are concerned about both the regulatory and macro-economic trends. The interviews and survey results show a number of recurring issues. Altogether, the survey results indicate that VC/PE investors consider FITs to be the best public clean energy policy instrument in leveraging private investment and finance for renewable energy in South Africa. This study serves to illustrate and confirm, in line with empirical studies, that VC/PE investors in South Africa believe that clean energy market-pull policies provide an impetus and indeed spur private investor participation in clean energy in developing countries. While it is true that most VC/PE investors would prefer the price certainty associated with a FIT regime, this is almost an irrelevant question in South Africa since constitutionally the state is bound to procure through competitive tendering. This study also serves to highlight the need for more active research and attention in this field.
Bisore, Simon. "Mécanisme pour un développement propre (MDP) du protocole de Kyoto: barrières et opportunités pour les pays moins avancés d'Afrique :cas du Burundi." Doctoral thesis, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/209646.
Full textParmi les problèmes posés par ce mécanisme de compensation, il y a des disparités observées dans la répartition géographique de sa mise en œuvre, alors qu’il est censé contribuer au développement de nombreux pays non-Annexe I. Parmi ceux-ci, les Pays les Moins Avancés (PMA) en général et ceux d’Afrique en particulier restent largement sous-représentés. Pourtant, le MDP a été adopté à la fois comme une contribution innovatrice à l’atténuation des changements climatiques et comme un moteur de promotion du développement durable dans les pays en développement.
Dans ce contexte, l’objectif général de cette thèse est triple. Primo, elle vise à étudier en profondeur cet instrument en dégageant ses principales caractéristiques, y compris les disparités d’implantation d’activités de projets qui lui sont liées. Secundo, elle en examine les causes par une analyse des barrières ou freins à la mise en œuvre d’activités de projets du MDP dans ces PMA d’Afrique en général et au Burundi en particulier. Tertio, elle révèle les opportunités (avantages/bénéfices) potentielles qui restent toujours non valorisées par l’implémentation d’activités de projets éligibles au titre du MDP.
L’analyse menée montre que les disparités susmentionnées jouent essentiellement en faveur des grands pays émergents d’Asie et d’Amérique latine, ce qui va à l’encontre du principe d’équité. En effet, en décembre 2011, le Brésil, la Chine et l’Inde détenaient 72,7 % de toutes les activités de projets du MDP et 75,8 % de crédits-carbone attendus en 2012. A l’opposé, les PMA ne disposaient dans le même temps que de 1,3 % de toutes les activités de projets du MDP et 1,2 % de leurs crédits attendus d’ici 2012. Les PMA d’Afrique ne restent qu’avec des parts de l’ordre de 0,8 % et 0,9 % respectivement. Cette situation reste si drastiquement critique qu’il importe d’en déceler les raisons.
Des caractéristiques de l’instrument, des expériences menées jusqu’ici et de la situation dans des pays hôtes, il ressort que les barrières sont de deux types. D’une part, les barrières endogènes, c'est-à-dire les barrières liées à l’organisation interne des pays. D’autre part, les barrières exogènes qui sont liées essentiellement à l’organisation générale du processus du MDP. L’étude a permis ainsi de montrer que les barrières endogènes constituent le nœud du problème en termes de visibilité des pays hôtes dans le marché du MDP. Celle-ci reste largement limitée dans ce marché international du carbone.
Les barrières identifiées dans ce travail, en particulier les barrières endogènes, risquent de se révéler difficiles à lever, car elles exigent des réformes structurelles au sein de l’organisation politique, institutionnelle, économique, et juridique du pays hôte. En outre, l’intégration de ces barrières dans un système unique d’interrelations constitue un des points originaux du travail. Ces interrelations ne sont pas négligeables et complexifient l’application du mécanisme, car, dans la plupart des cas, une action amorcée pour lever une barrière peut s’avérer inefficace si d’autres barrières associées ne sont pas prises en compte.
L’étude s’est également attachée à évaluer les retombées potentielles liées à la mise en œuvre d’activités de projets du MDP au Burundi. Les principales opportunités perdues jusqu’ici se situent dans quelques secteurs socioéconomiques du pays, essentiellement dans la gestion des déchets et l’énergie. L’étude en a ainsi retenu des options technologiques susceptibles de contribuer à des solutions à la problématique de la gestion des déchets et de l’approvisionnement énergétique au Burundi, tout en favorisant la stabilisation d’émissions de GES. Il s’agit de technologies adaptées de compostage et de bio-méthanisation dans le secteur de la gestion des déchets et les technologies de production d’énergies à partir de sources renouvelables (hydro, solaire, biogaz) et d’amélioration de l’efficacité énergétique de la biomasse (foyers améliorés, carbonisation) dans le secteur de l’énergie.
Ces opportunités ont également été analysées suivant des critères et indicateurs de durabilité (matrice de développement durable du Gold Standard). Les résultats montrent que ces options technologiques peuvent apporter une contribution au développement durable du pays. En effet, les opportunités se rencontrent à la fois dans le développement social (création d’emplois, moyens de subsistance des pauvres, accès aux énergies propres, renforcement des capacités), le développement écologique (réduction des émissions de GES, amélioration de la qualité de l’air, de l’eau et du sol, sauvegarde de la biodiversité), et le développement économique et technologique (rémunération d’emplois créés, augmentation des investissements, transfert et autonomie technologiques).
Afin de faire bénéficier le pays des retombées des activités de projets du MDP, il est proposé des solutions qui peuvent contribuer à une levée/atténuation de ces barrières. Ces propositions forment une combinaison d’actions à mener au niveau international, régional et surtout local/national. Au niveau international, des organes habilités devraient apporter des réformes profondes au MDP. Au niveau régional, le renforcement des capacités par des actions de coopération pourrait favoriser l’échange d’expériences en la matière. Au niveau local/national, l’adoption des réformes profondes aux niveaux institutionnel, législatif et juridique, dans une logique d’améliorer les politiques de planification du développement socioéconomique et environnemental, rendrait le pays naturellement plus attractif. En particulier, la mise en place et la mise en œuvre d’une stratégie nationale du MDP pourrait contribuer à relever le défi.
Les propositions de solutions pour réduire les barrières à la mise en œuvre d’activités de projets du MDP sont susceptibles de stimuler l’investissement en général. Ainsi, toute stratégie adoptée dans cette logique peut contribuer non seulement à la participation du pays au processus du MDP, mais aussi à favoriser la mise en œuvre d’autres projets conventionnels de développement au niveau national. Finalement, la considération de ces différentes opportunités associées à la mise en œuvre d’activités de projets du MDP au niveau du pays par des instances habilitées (décideurs politiques, acteurs institutionnels et économiques) conduirait à faire de ce mécanisme une contribution utile au développement du pays/The Kyoto Protocol has established a series of targets for reducing GHG emissions. The fulfilment of these objectives may result in heavy costs for the economies of developed countries engaged in the fight against climate change. To minimize the costs imposed by these targets, economic instruments were developed, notably with the creation of carbon markets. The three flexible mechanisms of Kyoto Protocol are involved in this, one of which being the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM).
Among the problems posed by this offset mechanism, disparities can be observed in regional distribution after it has been implemented, when it ought to be contributing towards the development of a number of Non-Annex I countries. Among these countries, the least developed ones (LDCs) in general and Africa ones in particular are largely under-represented. However, the CDM was adopted both as an innovative solution to mitigate climate change and as an engine to promote sustainable development in developing countries.
Within this context, the overall objective of this thesis is threefold. First of all, it aims to study this instrument in depth, by picking out its main characteristics, including the disparities in project activities implementation related to it. Secondly, it examines the causes for these disparities by analyzing the barriers or restrictions preventing implementation of CDM project activities in these African LDCs in general and in Burundi in particular. Its third purpose is to reveal the potential opportunities (advantages/benefits) which have yet to be developed by setting up eligible CDM project activities.
The analysis carried out shows that the aforementioned disparities come out in favor of the large emerging countries in Asia and Latin America primarily, which goes against the principle of equity. In fact, in December 2011, Brazil, China and India held 72.7% of all CDM project activities and 75.8% of carbon emission credits expected in 2012. On the contrary, for the same time period, the LDCs had only 1.3% of all CDM project activities and 1.2% of their carbon emission credits expected up until 2012. The African LDCs are left only with shares of 0.8% and 0.9% respectively. This situation is extremely critical. It is crucial to discover the reasons for it.
The instrument’s features, experiments carried out so far and the situation in host countries all reveal that the barriers fall into two categories. On the one hand, there are endogenous barriers, i.e. barriers related to the internal organization of countries. On the other hand, exogenous barriers are related to the general running of the CDM process especially. The study has thus revealed that the endogenous barriers are the crux of the problem where the presence of host countries is concerned in the CDM market. The visibility of host countries is rather limited in this international carbon market.
The barriers identified in this thesis, particularly endogenous ones, may be difficult to remove because they demand structural reforms in the political, institutional, economical and legal organization of the host country. In addition, the integration of these barriers into a single system of interrelationships is one of the original points of this thesis. These interrelationships are not insignificant and complicate the mechanism’s application, because in most cases, initiating an action to remove a barrier may be ineffective if other associated barriers are not taken into account.
The study has also focused on evaluating the potential impacts linked to the implementation of CDM project activities in Burundi. The main opportunities lost up to date are in some socioeconomic sectors in the country, particularly in the waste management and energy sectors. The study has therefore identified technological options that are likely to bring solutions to the question of waste management and energy supply in Burundi, while at the same time contributing to the stabilization of greenhouse gas emissions. These options are notably composting and anaerobic digestion technologies in the area of waste management, and energy generation technologies from renewable sources (hydro, solar, biogas) and improved energy efficiency of biomass (better households, carbonization) in the energy sector.
These opportunities were also analyzed in accordance with sustainability criteria and indicators (Gold Standard sustainable development matrix). The results show that these technological options may contribute to sustainable development in the country. Indeed, the opportunities can be seen at the same time in social development (job creation, means of subsistence for the poor, clean energy access, capacity building); ecological development (reducing GHG emissions, improvement in quality of air, water and soil, preservation of biodiversity) and economic & technological development (better pay for jobs created, increased investment, technology transfer and technological autonomy).
In order to allow the country to take advantage of these opportunities through CDM project activities, it has been proposed solutions that can help raise/mitigate these barriers. These proposals are a combination of actions to be taken at international and regional levels and above all at a local/ national level. In the international arena, authorized bodies should make major reforms to the CDM. At a regional level, capacity building through joint actions could encourage the exchange of expertise in the field. Locally/nationally, adopting major reforms at institutional, legislative and legal levels, with a view to improving planning policies in socioeconomic and environmental development, would make the country naturally more attractive. In particular, establishing and implementing a national CDM strategy could also contribute towards taking up the challenge.
Proposals of solutions for mitigating barriers to implement CDM project activities are likely to stimulate investment in general. Thus, any strategy adopted along these lines can contribute not only to the country’s participation in the CDM process, but also to favoring implementation of other conventional projects for development at national level. Finally, considering these different opportunities associated with implementing CDM project activities in the country via authorized bodies (policymakers, institutional and economic actors) would lead to this mechanism being a useful contribution towards national development.
Doctorat en Sciences
info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished
Sangham, Anilrai I. "Barriers to and determinants of funding sustainable development projects in developing countries : a case study of the eThekwini Municipality." Thesis, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2604.
Full textThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the barriers to and the determinants of funding sustainable development through the implementation of the Clean Development Mechanism at the Bisasar Road and Mariannhill landfill sites. The Clean Development Mechanism is an economic construct, arising out of the Kyoto Protocol (UNFCCC 2004:10), and formulated to promote social and economic welfare by transferring technology in such a manner, that it promotes sustainable development and ecological renewal. The stated goal of CDM (UNFCCC: 10) is to reduce harmful emissions and thereafter, to produce sustainable development and ecological renewal. This research utilised the case study methodology as advocated by Eisenhardt (1989:538). The study employed multiple data collection methodologies which included face-face interviews, within case analysis, triangulation, field notes and photographs. An important component of the data collection methodology was to access financial records of revenue flows for the CDM implementation process from January 2009 to December 2015. The research found that there is no conclusive evidence to suggest that the Clean Development Mechanism, as implemented at Bisasar Road and Mariannhill, reduced carbon emissions. Further, the study found that the production of clean energy produced financial losses rather than revenues for funding sustainable development. The relevance and value of this research lies in the presentation and formatting of the Systematic Sequential Analysis Model. The purpose of the Systematic Sequential Analysis Model is to introduce a series of financial, macro-economic, micro-economic, and technical sustainability filters for the implementation of the Clean Development Mechanism in developing countries.
D
Bolt, Gerhardus Derk. "A unique energy-efficiency-investment-decision-model for energy services companies / Gerhardus Derk Bolt." Thesis, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10394/10582.
Full textPhD (Mechanical Engineering), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2009
Books on the topic "Clean energy investment"
Davulis, John. Maine's green economy: An overview of renewable energy and energy efficiency sectors. Augusta, Me: Center for Workforce Research and Information, Maine Department of Labor, 2009.
Find full textAsplund, Richard W. Profiting from Clean Energy. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2008.
Find full textNewmark, Robin L. Implications of future energy choices in the energy-water-land nexus: WREF Forum: Energy-Water Nexus: an international perspective. Golden, CO]: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2012.
Find full textSmith, Tobin. Billion dollar green: Profit from the eco revolution. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
Find full textHoey, Amanda. Clean state energy actions: 2011 update. Washington, DC?]: NGA Center for Best Practices, 2012.
Find full textGhosh, Shikhar. Venture capital investment in the clean energy sector. [Boston]: Harvard Business School, 2010.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Clean energy race: The United States and China : hearing before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, second session ... June 14, 2012. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2012.
Find full textD, Gammell David, Afonso Paul G, and Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc. (1982- ), eds. ECO: law: Representing clean tech industries. Boston, MA: MCLE, 2009.
Find full textD, Gammell David, Afonso Paul G, and Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc. (1982- ), eds. ECO: law: Representing clean tech industries. Boston, MA: MCLE, 2009.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Clean energy investment"
Weiss, Barbara, and Michiyo Obi. "Clean Energy Technology: Investment and Investment Financing in Renewable Energy, Batteries, Energy Supply and Storage." In Environmental Risk Mitigation, 107–35. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33957-3_6.
Full textMichoud, Bruno, and Manfred Hafner. "Direct and Indirect Investments in the Energy Sector." In Financing Clean Energy Access in Sub-Saharan Africa, 83–101. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75829-5_5.
Full textMichoud, Bruno, and Manfred Hafner. "Risk Mitigation Instruments Targeting Specific Investment Risks." In Financing Clean Energy Access in Sub-Saharan Africa, 119–26. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75829-5_7.
Full textMichoud, Bruno, and Manfred Hafner. "Further Areas of Work." In Financing Clean Energy Access in Sub-Saharan Africa, 151–52. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75829-5_11.
Full textMichoud, Bruno, and Manfred Hafner. "Risk Analysis and Mitigation Strategy Identification." In Financing Clean Energy Access in Sub-Saharan Africa, 27–55. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75829-5_3.
Full textMichoud, Bruno, and Manfred Hafner. "Annex." In Financing Clean Energy Access in Sub-Saharan Africa, 153–97. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75829-5_12.
Full textHosseini, Seyed Vahid, Ali Izadi, Seyed Hossein Madani, Yong Chen, and Mahmoud Chizari. "Design Procedure of a Hybrid Renewable Power Generation System." In Springer Proceedings in Energy, 155–62. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63916-7_20.
Full textStephani, Elizabeth. "A Pivotal Moment for Energy Community Cooperation in Chile." In Just Transitions, 137–46. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46282-5_19.
Full textLi, Yizheng, Dong Peng, Lang Zhao, Cong Liu, and Yawei Xue. "Grid Investment Performance Portfolio Forecasting Model Based on PLS-VIP-GA-ELM." In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Clean Energy and Electrical Systems, 209–20. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3888-9_15.
Full textNardini, Isabella. "Geothermal Power Generation." In The Palgrave Handbook of International Energy Economics, 183–94. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86884-0_11.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Clean energy investment"
Ioannou, A., C. Vaienti, A. Angus, and F. Brennan. "A cluster analysis of investment strategies in the offshore wind energy market." In 2017 6th International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iccep.2017.8004841.
Full textNing, Yuxin, and Jiamei Wang. "Study on the Cause of Venture Capital Investment in China's Clean Energy." In ICIMTECH 21: The Sixth International Conference on Information Management and Technology. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3465631.3465738.
Full textChambino, Mariana, Rui Dias, and Cristina Morais da Palma. "Will There Be Dependencies between Oil Prices and Clean Energy Indexes?" In 9th International Scientific Conference ERAZ - Knowledge Based Sustainable Development. Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.31410/eraz.2023.57.
Full textHorta, Nicole, Mariana Chambino, and Rui Dias. "Interconnections between Clean Energy and Traditional Commodities: Analysis of Energy Fuels, S&P Global Clean Energy Index, and Ishares Global Clean Energy ETF Compared to Oil, Gold, and Natural Gas Prices." In 7th International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2023 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times. Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.31410/eman.2023.101.
Full textStasis, R. Peter, Robert E. Henson, and Ronald D. Larson. "Pinellas County Resource Recovery Facility Capital Replacement Project: “Securing a Retrofit Investment — A Capital Replacement Initiative”." In 9th Annual North American Waste-to-Energy Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/nawtec9-116.
Full textBai, Xuekai. "The Analysis of a Model for Assessing Investment Risks of Overseas Clean Energy Projects." In 2021 International Conference on Control Science and Electric Power Systems (CSEPS). IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cseps53726.2021.00035.
Full textXue, Yu. "Research on Influencing Factors of Power Grid Investment Efficiency Adapting to Clean Energy Development." In 2023 2nd Asia Power and Electrical Technology Conference (APET). IEEE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/apet59977.2023.10489282.
Full textAllan, Paul. "Into the Unknown: Expert System Guides Energy Transition Strategy." In SPE Symposium: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Shape the Future of the Energy Industry. SPE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/214458-ms.
Full textSu, Yunche, Chuan Yuan, Yumeng Zhen, Jingwei Deng, Xiaodi Wang, and Yidan Lu. "Generation Mix Optimization Considering Coal-Fired Units Retirement and Multi-type Clean Energy Units Investment." In 2023 6th International Conference on Energy, Electrical and Power Engineering (CEEPE). IEEE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ceepe58418.2023.10165724.
Full textHill, Davion M. "Probabilistic Energy ROI Models: Carbon, Energy, and Dollars." In ASME 2010 4th International Conference on Energy Sustainability. ASMEDC, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/es2010-90408.
Full textReports on the topic "Clean energy investment"
Wiser, Ryan, Mark Bolinger, Lewis Milford, Kevin Porter, and Roger Clark. Innovation, renewable energy, and state investment: Case studies of leading clean energy funds. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/807421.
Full textPrice, Roz. Private Sector Investment in the Clean Energy Sector in the Pacific Islands. Institute of Development Studies, August 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/k4d.2022.132.
Full textKoebrich, Samuel, and Bethany K. Speer. Hot Topic Brief: Emerging Policies for Mobilizing Private Sector Investment into Clean Energy in the Philippines. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), December 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1580101.
Full textChapple, Alice, and Bojan Bozovic. A rapid desk-based study: Private investment in clean energy, inclusive agribusiness and financial inclusion: evidence of impact. Evidence on Demand, September 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.12774/eod_hd.october2015.chappleetal.
Full textMarín, Anabel. Bringing Democracy to Governance of Mining for a Just Energy Transition. Institute of Development Studies, August 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/ids.2023.039.
Full textGhosh, Duke, and Anupa Ghosh. Evidence and gaps in evidence on the principle political economy constraints and opportunities to successful investment in clean energy in Asia. Evidence on Demand, March 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.12774/eod_hd.january2016.ghoshdetal.
Full textFabra, Natalia, Eduardo Gutiérrez, Aitor Lacuesta, and Roberto Ramos. Do Renewables Create Local Jobs? Madrid: Banco de España, January 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.53479/29475.
Full textDorr, Adam, and Tony Seba. Rethinking Energy: The Great Stranding: How Inaccurate Mainstream LCOE Estimates are Creating a Trillion-Dollar Bubble in Conventional Energy Assets. RethinkX, February 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.61322/uuda4616.
Full textLi, Francis G. N., Christopher Bataille, and Adrien Vogt-Schilb. Net-Zero Industry: Options for Plastics, Textiles, Automobiles, and Fisheries in Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru. Inter-American Development Bank, September 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0005167.
Full textPutriastuti, Massita Ayu Cindy, Vivi Fitriyanti, Vivid Amalia Khusna, and Inka B. Yusgiantoro. Crowdfunding Potential: Willingness to Invest and Donate for Green Project in Indonesia. Purnomo Yusgiantoro Center, August 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.33116/pycrr-1.
Full text