Academic literature on the topic 'Coal-fired power power plant'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Coal-fired power power plant.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Coal-fired power power plant"
Xu, Lingyan, Fenglian Huang, Jianguo Du, and Dandan Wang. "Decisions in Power Supply Chain with Emission Reduction Effort of Coal-Fired Power Plant under the Power Market Reform." Sustainability 12, no. 16 (August 14, 2020): 6582. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12166582.
Full textRahmanta, Mujammil Asdhiyoga, and Muhammad Iqbal Felani. "Application of Rotary Drum Dryer at Ombilin Coal Fired Power Plant." International Journal of Materials, Mechanics and Manufacturing 3, no. 3 (2015): 183–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.7763/ijmmm.2015.v3.192.
Full text-COOPER, James F. "Clean burn coal fired power plant." Revue de l'Electricité et de l'Electronique -, no. 03 (1995): 41. http://dx.doi.org/10.3845/ree.1995.032.
Full textOmar J. Khaleel, Thamir Khalil Ibrahim, Firas Basim Ismail, and Saiful Hasmady Abu Hassan. "Thermal Performance of Coal-Fired Power Plant based on Number of Feedwater Heaters." Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 95, no. 1 (June 18, 2022): 188–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.95.1.188205.
Full textSamsuri, Rohmat, Fauzan Kamal, and Gasim Hayder. "Climate Change Impact Assessment to the Proposed Coal Fired Power Plant Project at East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia." International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7, no. 4.35 (November 30, 2018): 538. http://dx.doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.35.22906.
Full textPurevsuren, Boldsaikhan, and Juyoul Kim. "Public Health Effects of Radioactive Airborne Effluents from Nuclear and Coal-Fired Power Plant." Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations 2021 (January 19, 2021): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6685385.
Full textFan, Qing Xin, Jin Meng Li, and Wei Qiu. "Construction of Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Evaluation Index System in Coal-Fired Power Plants and its Application." Advanced Materials Research 962-965 (June 2014): 1875–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.962-965.1875.
Full textTsybekmitova, G. Ts. "Coal-fired power plant and aquatic ecosystems." IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 629 (January 14, 2021): 012031. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/629/1/012031.
Full textKumar, Vinod, and Liqiang Duan. "Off-Design Dynamic Performance Analysis of a Solar Aided Coal-Fired Power Plant." Energies 14, no. 10 (May 19, 2021): 2950. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en14102950.
Full textChan, Richard Siu Chung, Tsz Sum Ho, Antony Wai Ip Ho, and Aaron Hong Lun Pang. "Low temperature economiser in enhancing coal-fired power plant performance." Special Issue with Awarded and Shortlisted Papers from the HKIE Outstanding Paper Award for Young Engineers/Researchers 2019 26, no. 4 (December 20, 2019): 190–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.33430/v26n4thie-2019-0014.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Coal-fired power power plant"
Moumakwa, Donald Omphemetse. "Tribology in coal-fired power plants." Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16616.
Full textA series of alumina ceramics and silicon carbide (SiC) particulate composites were evaluated in terms of their erosive and abrasive wear behaviour under different conditions, with the aim of reducing wear damage in power plants. The alumina ceramics tested ranged in composition from 90% alumina to 97% alumina content. A nitride fired and an oxide fired SiC particulate composites were also tested for comparison. The impact angle, impact velocity, as well as particle size and type were varied for solid-partide erosion, whereas effects of the applied load, abrasive speed and type of abrasive were studied for abrasive wear. The target materials were also evaluated in terms of morphology and mechanical properties including hardness, flexural modulus and flexural strengths. The erosion rates of the tested alumina ceramics increase with an increase in the impact angle, reaching a maximum at 90°. The high purity 96% alumina dry-pressed body has the best erosion resistance at most impact angles, while the 92% alumina dry pressed body has the worst erosion resistance. The erosion rates also increased with an increase in particle impact velocity, resulting in a velocity exponent (n) value of 1.5. A decrease in the erosion rate was observed for both an increase in particle size range and a decrease in erodent partide hardness. At all angles of impact, solid partide erosion of the target materials is dominated by intergranular fracture and surfaces are typically characterized by erosion pits. The five alumina target materials also show a marked increase in erosion rates when the test temperature is increased from ambient to 150°C. The abrasive wear rates for the materials increased with both applied load and abrasive speed, owing to increased tribological stresses at the contacting asperities. There is also a general trend of increasing abrasion resistance with increasing alumina content. Severe wear, characterized by fracture and grain pullout, is the dominant mechanism of material removal during abrasive wear. This was accompanied by the formation of grooves on the wear surfaces. Although this study was successful in terms of material selection for wear damage reduction in power plants, it also highlighted significant factors and modifications that might need to be considered in future studies.
Dugstad, Tore, and Esben Tonning Jensen. "CO2 Capture from Coal fired Power Plants." Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Energy and Process Engineering, 2008. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:no:ntnu:diva-9770.
Full textCoal is the most common fossil resource for power production worldwide and generates 40% of the worlds total electricity production. Even though coal is considered a pollutive resource, the great amounts and the increasing power demand leads to extensive use even in new developed power plants. To cover the world's future energy demand and at the same time limit our effect on global warming, coal fired power plants with CO2 capture is probably a necessity. An Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Power Plant is a utilization of coal which gives incentives for CO2 capture. Coal is partially combusted in a reaction with steam and pure oxygen. The oxygen is produced in an air separation process and the steam is generated in the Power Island. Out of the gasifier comes a mixture of mainly H2 and CO. In a shift reactor the CO and additional steam are converted to CO2 and more H2. Carbon dioxide is separated from the hydrogen in a physical absorption process and compressed for storage. Hydrogen diluted with nitrogen from the air separation process is used as fuel in a combined cycle similar to NGCC. A complete IGCC Power Plant is described in this report. The air separation unit is modeled as a Linde two column process. Ambient air is compressed and cooled to dew point before it is separated into oxygen and nitrogen in a cryogenic distillation process. Out of the island oxygen is at a purity level of 95.6% and the nitrogen has a purity of 99.6%. The production cost of oxygen is 0.238 kWh per kilogram of oxygen delivered at 25°C and 1.4bar. The oxygen is then compressed to a gasification pressure of 42bar. In the gasification unit the oxygen together with steam is used to gasify the coal. On molar basis the coal composition is 73.5% C, 22.8% H2, 3.1% O2, 0.3% N2 and 0.3% S. The gasification temperature is at 1571°C and out of the unit comes syngas consisting of 66.9% CO, 31.1% H2, 1.4% H2O, 0.3% N2, 0.2% H2S and 0.1% CO2. The syngas is cooled and fed to a water gas shift reactor. Here the carbon monoxide is reacted with steam forming carbon dioxide and additional hydrogen. The gas composition of the gas out of the shift reactor is on dry basis 58.2% H2, 39.0% CO2, 2.4% CO, 0.2% N2 and 0.1% H2S. Both the gasification process and shift reactor is exothermal and there is no need of external heating. This leads to an exothermal heat loss, but parts of this heat is recovered. The gasifier has a Cold Gas Efficiency (CGE) of 84.0%. With a partial pressure of CO2 at 15.7 bar the carbon dioxide is easily removed by physical absorption. After separation the solvent is regenerated by expansion and CO2 is pressurized to 110bar to be stored. This process is not modeled, but for the scrubbing part an energy consumption of 0.08kWh per kilogram CO2 removed is assumed. For the compression of CO2, it is calculated with an energy consumption of 0.11kWh per kilogram CO2 removed. Removal of H2S and other pollutive unwanted substances is also removed in the CO2 scrubber. Between the CO2 removal and the combustion chamber is the H2 rich fuel gas is diluted with nitrogen from the air separation unit. This is done to increase the mass flow through the turbine. The amount of nitrogen available is decided by the amount of oxygen produced to the gasification process. Almost all the nitrogen produced may be utilized as diluter except from a few percent used in the coal feeding procedure to the gasifier. The diluted fuel gas has a composition of 50.4% H2, 46.1% N2, 2.1% CO and 1.4% CO2. In the Power Island a combined cycle with a gas turbine able to handle large H2 amounts is used. The use of steam in the gasifier and shift reactor are integrated in the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) in the steam cycle. The heat removed from the syngas cooler is also recovered in the HRSG. The overall efficiency of the IGCC plant modeled is 36.8%. This includes oxygen and nitrogen production and compression, production of high pressure steam used in the Gasification Island, coal feeding costs, CO2 removal and compression and pressure losses through the processes. Other losses are not implemented and will probably reduce the efficiency.
Sasi, Giuma A. A. "Evaluation Of Metal Concentrations In Groundwater Nearby Soma Coal-fired Power Plant." Master's thesis, METU, 2005. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12606756/index.pdf.
Full textNa, Ca, K, Mg, Al, Ba, Fe, Zn, Cu, Pb, Cr, Cd, Ni and V. Samples were collected in polyethylene bottles, the pH of the water was measured. Then, the samples were acidified and stored to be analyzed. FAAS, FAES, GFAAS and ICP-AES were used to determine the elements. The results were compared with the WHO, the Turkish and EC guidelines for drinking water quality. Fe concentrations in 12 wells were higher the three guidelines. Zn concentrations in 5 wells were higher than the EC guidelines, but not higher than the Turkish guidelines. Pb concentrations was less than all guilelines but it was relatively high in 8 wells. The other anthropogenic elements were lower than all guidelines but these metals tend to accumulate and they will exceed the guildlines overtime. Enrichment factor calculations showed that the anthropogenic elements were enriched in the regions close to the ash piles pointing out that the ash piles are the main source of these elements. Factor analysis was applied and four main factors of the determined metals were found indicating that the power plant and the ash piles are the main source for the anthropogenic elements.
Vir, Arun. "Solar Booster Augmentation for Existing Coal Fired Power Plant (A Feasibility Study)." Thesis, KTH, Kraft- och värmeteknologi, 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-103911.
Full textSyed, Muzaffar Ali. "CO2-fuel gas separtationfor a conventional coal-fired power plant (first approach)." Thesis, Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Ingenjörshögskolan, 2008. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-18705.
Full textUppsatsnivå: D
Paredez, Jose Miguel. "Coal-fired power plant flue gas desulfurization wastewater treatment using constructed wetlands." Thesis, Kansas State University, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/18255.
Full textDepartment of Civil Engineering
Natalie Mladenov
In the United States approximately 37% of the 4 trillion kWh of electricity is generated annually by combusting coal (USEPA, 2013). The abundance of coal, ease of storage, and transportation makes it affordable at a global scale (Ghose, 2009). However, the flue gas produced by combusting coal affects human health and the environment (USEPA, 2013). To comply with federal regulations coal-fired power plants have been implementing sulfur dioxide scrubbing systems such as flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems (Alvarez-Ayuso et al., 2006). Although FGD systems have proven to reduce atmospheric emissions they create wastewater containing harmful pollutants. Constructed wetlands are increasingly being employed for the removal of these toxic trace elements from FGD wastewater. In this study the effectiveness of using a constructed wetland treatment system was explored as a possible remediation technology to treat FGD wastewater from a coal-fired power plant in Kansas. To simulate constructed wetlands, a continuous flow-through column experiment was conducted with undiluted FGD wastewater and surface sediment from a power plant in Kansas. To optimize the performance of a CWTS the following hypotheses were tested: 1) decreasing the flow rate improves the performance of the treatment wetlands due to an increase in reaction time, 2) the introduction of microbial cultures (inoculum) will increase the retention capacity of the columns since constructed wetlands improve water quality through biological process, 3) the introduction of a labile carbon source will improve the retention capacity of the columns since microorganisms require an electron donor to perform life functions such as cell maintenance and synthesis. Although the FGD wastewater collected possessed a negligible concentration of arsenic, the mobilization of arsenic has been observed in reducing sediments of wetland environments. Therefore, constructed wetlands may also represent an environment where the mobilization of arsenic is possible. This led us to test the following hypothesis: 4) Reducing environments will cause arsenic desorption and dissolution causing the mobilization of arsenic. As far as removal of the constituents of concern (arsenic, selenium, nitrate, and sulfate) in the column experiments, only sulfate removal increased as a result of decreasing the flow rate by half (1/2Q). In addition, sulfate-S exhibited greater removal as a result of adding organic carbon to the FGD solution when compared to the control (at 1/2Q). Moderate selenium removal was observed; over 60% of selenium in the influent was found to accumulate in the soil. By contrast, arsenic concentrations increased in the effluent of the 1/2Q columns, most likely by dissolution and release of sorbed arsenic. When compared to the control (at 1/2Q), arsenic dissolution decreased as a result of adding inoculum to the columns. Dissolved arsenic concentrations in the effluent of columns with FGD solution amended with organic carbon reached 168 mg/L. These results suggest that native Kansas soils placed in a constructed wetland configuration and amended with labile carbon do possess an environment where the mobilization of arsenic is possible.
Smith, P. J. "Predicting hot corrosion rates under coal fired combined cycle power plant conditions." Thesis, Cranfield University, 1994. http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/10512.
Full textMohd, Nistah Nong Nurnie. "An Intelligent Monitoring Interface for a Coal-Fired Power Plant Boiler Trips." Thesis, Curtin University, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/77234.
Full textEastwick, Carol Norma. "Mathematical modelling of pulverised coal-fired burners." Thesis, University of Nottingham, 1995. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.283535.
Full textEdge, Penelope Jayne. "Modelling and simulation of oxy-coal fired power plants." Thesis, University of Leeds, 2011. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.550804.
Full textBooks on the topic "Coal-fired power power plant"
Wynn, Sarah L. Aerial photography and aground verification at power plant sites: Wisconsin power plant impact study. Duluth, MN: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, 1985.
Find full textNorthwest Power Planning Council (U.S.). Coal-fired generating resources. Portland, Or: The Council, 1989.
Find full textIndo German Power Plant Seminar: Clean Use of Coal (1992 New Delhi, India). Indo German Power Plant Seminar: Clean Use of Coal : proceedings. New Delhi, India: National Thermal Power Corporation, 1992.
Find full textChmielniak, Tadeusz. Diagnostics of new-generation thermal power plants. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo IMP PAN, 2008.
Find full textCarbon dioxide removal from coal-fired power plants. Dordrecht [Netherlands]: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Coal-fired power power plant"
Liu, Xingrang, and Ramesh Bansal. "Internet-Supported Coal-Fired Power Plant Boiler Combustion Optimization Platform." In Thermal Power Plants, 275–84. Boca Raton : Taylor & Francis, CRC Press, 2016.: CRC Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315371467-15.
Full textOka, Y., and Mohd Raziff Embi. "Coal-Fired Boiler Plant History for Malaysian Projects." In Challenges of Power Engineering and Environment, 197–203. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76694-0_36.
Full textNemalipuri, Pruthiviraj, Harish Chandra Das, and Malay Kumar Pradhan. "Simulation of Emission from Coal-Fired Power Plant." In Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 975–86. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0124-1_87.
Full textBroßmann, Egbert, Martin Kaltschmitt, and Marc Koch. "Co-combustion co-combustion of Wood co-combustion of wood in Coal-Fired power plant coal-fired Large-Scale Power Plants power plant." In Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology, 2270–86. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_314.
Full textBroßmann, Egbert, Martin Kaltschmitt, and Marc Koch. "Co-combustion co-combustion of Wood co-combustion of wood in Coal-Fired power plant coal-fired Large-Scale Power Plants power plant." In Renewable Energy Systems, 680–95. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5820-3_314.
Full textCui, Yinghong, Yongping Yang, and Juan Chen. "Utilization of Solar Energy in a Coal-fired Plant." In Challenges of Power Engineering and Environment, 1207–12. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76694-0_225.
Full textHall, Robert E., Chun-Wai Lee, and Nick D. Hutson. "Mercury Control for Coal-fired Power Plants." In Challenges of Power Engineering and Environment, 850–54. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76694-0_158.
Full textWestmoreland, James B. "Radium Monitoring at Coal Fired Power Plants." In Special Publications, 184–90. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/9781788017732-00184.
Full textAbbott, Murray F., Robert E. Douglas, Carl E. Fink, Nicholas J. Deluliis, and Larry L. Baxter. "A Modeling Strategy for Correlating Coal Quality to Power Plant Performance and Power Costs." In The Impact of Ash Deposition on Coal Fired Plants, 165–76. Boca Raton: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780203736616-17.
Full textHaloi, Prabin, and Tapan Kumar Gogoi. "Exergy Modelling of a Coal-Fired MHD Power Plant." In Advances in Applied Mechanical Engineering, 81–89. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1201-8_10.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Coal-fired power power plant"
Powers, Shane E., and William C. Wood. "Performance Testing of Coal Fired Power Plants." In ASME 2007 Power Conference. ASMEDC, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/power2007-22132.
Full textTermuehlen, Heinz. "Improving Coal-Fired Power Plant Performance and Operating Flexibility Today." In ASME 2004 Power Conference. ASMEDC, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/power2004-52129.
Full textKrzysztof, Polko, Krzysztof Jesionek, and Badur Janusz. "Condensing Heat Exchanger in Coal-Fired Power Plant." In MultiScience - XXIX. microCAD International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference. University of Miskolc, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.26649/musci.2015.068.
Full textHu, N., and Y. f. Pei. "Water-Saving Technologies for Coal-Fired Power Plant." In 2015 International Forum on Energy, Environment Science and Materials. Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/ifeesm-15.2015.207.
Full textStevens, Robin, Chantelle Lonsdale, Charles Brock, Paul Makar, Eladio Knipping, Molly Reed, James Crawford, et al. "Aerosol nucleation in coal-fired power-plant plumes." In NUCLEATION AND ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS: 19th International Conference. AIP, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4803292.
Full textNadig, Ranga. "Considerations in Converting a Dual Shell or a Dual Pressure Coal Fired Plant Condenser Into a Combined Cycle Plant Condenser." In ASME 2013 Power Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/power2013-98062.
Full textHamel, H. J., Walter Jaeger, Volker Fattinger, and Heinz Termuehlen. "Multi-Pollutant Removal System Performance: Based on Testing and Plant Operation Experience." In ASME 2006 Power Conference. ASMEDC, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/power2006-88018.
Full textIshida, Keiichi. "Out Line of the Osaki CoolGen Project." In ASME 2017 Power Conference Joint With ICOPE-17 collocated with the ASME 2017 11th International Conference on Energy Sustainability, the ASME 2017 15th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology, and the ASME 2017 Nuclear Forum. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/power-icope2017-3333.
Full textJian, Zhao, and Liu Shi-xin. "Models for coal blending with inventory in coal-fired power plant." In 2013 25th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ccdc.2013.6561223.
Full textLu, Ping, Jiang Wu, and Wei-Ping Pan. "Particulate Matter Emissions from a Coal-Fired Power Plant." In 2010 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (iCBBE). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icbbe.2010.5517175.
Full textReports on the topic "Coal-fired power power plant"
Davis, Rebecca, J. Scott Holladay, and Charles Sims. Coal-Fired Power Plant Retirements in the U.S. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, June 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w28949.
Full textBruce C. Folkedahl, Greg F. Weber, and Michael E. Collings. Water Extraction from Coal-Fired Power Plant Flue Gas. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/927112.
Full textTaylor, M. J., and L. C. Fuller. Coal-fired electric power plant life extension: an overview. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), July 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/5705070.
Full textElcock, D., and J. Kuiper. Water vulnerabilities for existing coal-fired power plants. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), August 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/986305.
Full textVeil, J. A. Impacts of TMDLs on coal-fired power plants. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), April 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/979557.
Full textOztekin, Alparslan, Zheng Yao, Carlos Romero, Pauline Norris, and Martin Cohron. Coal-Fired Power Plant Configuration and Operation Impact on Plant Effluent Contaminants and Conditions. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), March 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1856496.
Full textSULLIVAN, T. M., J. ADAMS, L. MILIAN, S. SUBRAMANIAN, L. FEAGIN, J. WILLIAMS, and A. BOYD. LOCAL IMPACTS OF MERCURY EMISSIONS FROM THE MONTICELLO COAL FIRED POWER PLANT. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), October 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/899614.
Full textZhang, Jing. Novel Functionally Graded Thermal Barrier Coatings in Coal-Fired Power Plant Turbines. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), November 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1369643.
Full textGrol, Eric. Update to Regulatory Activity Impacting Coal-Fired Power Plants. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1502448.
Full textTrevor Ley. ASSESSMENT OF LOW COST NOVEL SORBENTS FOR COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT MERCURY CONTROL. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/833608.
Full text