Academic literature on the topic 'Coccidiosis. Cattle'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Coccidiosis. Cattle.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Coccidiosis. Cattle"
Wood, Sarah, David Barrett, Neil Sargison, Michael Millar, Keith Cutler, and Tim Potter. "Coccidiosis in cattle." Livestock 18, no. 3 (May 2013): 54–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/live.2013.18.3.54.
Full textErnst, John V., and Gerald W. Benz. "Intestinal Coccidiosis in Cattle." Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 2, no. 2 (July 1986): 283–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0720(15)31238-x.
Full textSudhakara Reddy, B., S. Sivajothi, and V. C. Rayulu. "Clinical coccidiosis in adult cattle." Journal of Parasitic Diseases 39, no. 3 (November 26, 2013): 557–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12639-013-0395-1.
Full textEkawasti, Fitrine, and April H. Wardhana. "Coccidiosis Disease in Cattle in Indonesia and Development of Diagnostic Techniques." Indonesian Bulletin of Animal and Veterinary Sciences 29, no. 3 (September 8, 2019): 133. http://dx.doi.org/10.14334/wartazoa.v29i3.2010.
Full textNieman, Christine C., Daniel M. Schaefer, Michael Maroney, Kathryn Nelson, and Kenneth A. Albrecht. "Hepatogenous Photosensitivity Outbreak after Coccidiosis in Grazing Holstein Steers." Veterinary Sciences 7, no. 4 (November 24, 2020): 186. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7040186.
Full textAl-Jubory, Q. J. A. "Epidemiological Study of Coccidiosis In Cattle of Babylon." Al-Qadisiyah Journal of Veterinary Medicine Sciences 11, no. 3 (December 30, 2012): 55. http://dx.doi.org/10.29079/vol11iss3art222.
Full textJUBB, TF. "Nervous disease associated with coccidiosis in young cattle." Australian Veterinary Journal 65, no. 11 (November 1988): 353–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1988.tb14263.x.
Full textSufi, Isrok Malikus, Umi Cahyaningsih, and Etih Sudarnika. "PREVALENSI DAN FAKTOR RISIKO KOKSIDIOSIS PADA SAPI PERAH DI KABUPATEN BANDUNG (Prevalence and Risk Factor of Coccidiosis in Dairy Cattle in Bandung District)." Jurnal Kedokteran Hewan - Indonesian Journal of Veterinary Sciences 10, no. 2 (September 4, 2016): 195–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.21157/j.ked.hewan.v10i2.5138.
Full textMitchell, E. S. E., R. P. Smith, and J. Ellis-Iversen. "Husbandry risk factors associated with subclinical coccidiosis in young cattle." Veterinary Journal 193, no. 1 (July 2012): 119–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.09.017.
Full textHamid, Penny Humaidah, Yuli Purwandari Kristianingrum, and Sigit Prastowo. "Bovine coccidiosis cases of beef and dairy cattle in Indonesia." Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports 17 (August 2019): 100298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2019.100298.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Coccidiosis. Cattle"
Lucas, Aaron Scott. "Bovine Coccidiosis: Dynamics of infection in grazing cattle and the potential role of stress and immunity." Diss., Virginia Tech, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/39126.
Full textPh. D.
Bangoura, Berit. "Studien zur Charakterisierung und metaphylaktischen Kontrolle der Eimeria zuernii - Kokzidiose des Kalbes." Doctoral thesis, Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig, 2008. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-20080526-081807-1.
Full textMengel, Heidrun. "Epidemiologische Untersuchungen zum Auftreten und Verlauf von bovinen Eimeria spp. Infektionen in Deutschland, Belgien, Frankreich und der Tschechischen Republik." Doctoral thesis, Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig, 2012. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa-99314.
Full textA total number of 263 calves housed on 12 different farms in several regions in Germany, Belgium, France and the Czech Republic were followed individually in tracking studies and data was compiled and analysed to investigate factors influencing occurrence and severity of bovine eimeriosis of housed calves. The same data was used for development and verification of a suitable threshold indicating relevant oocyst excretion. Within the tracking studies a total number of 5840 faecal samples were examined for faecal consistency, oocyst counts of pathogenic E. bovis and E. zuernii excretion carried out and individual body weight development was documented regularly. Additionally 23 groups of animals on 16 farms were observed for a period of five weeks and 5133 faecal samples examined for oocyst excretion and Eimeria species differentiated. All study sites were positive for mixed coccidia species infections. Nevertheless all farms except one showed a predominance of one pathogenic Eimeria species, which remained unchanged in different groups of animals and even in different years of investigations. Animal origin, i.e. groups of animals representing own breeding or originating of only one source in contrast to groups of calves coming from several origins, influences the course of the coccidiosis infection. Farms with only one single and permanent animal origin or raising exclusively the own breeding show coccidiosis with a single peak of oocyst excretion. On farms housing groups of animals of various origins the course of infection and oocyst shedding has typically two peaks with an interval of two to three weeks. The risk for development of clinical coccidiosis rises significantly if animals were housed on straw bedding compared to slatted-floor (p = 0.005). Faecal scores correlated significantly (p = 0.000) with the intensity of oocyst excretion with a positive correlation coefficient of 0.135. For occurrence of diarrhoea a positive linear correlation with the oocyst excretion was statistically proved (p = 0.000) for various thresholds. At a threshold of 500 opg of E. bovis and E. zuernii the correlation coefficient rised to 0.149 and correlation coefficients did not rise distinctly or even got down if higher thresholds were used (values between 0.153 and 0.121). Focusing only on potentially coccidiosis related diarrhoea the threshold of 500 opg of E. bovis and E. zuernii proved to result in the highest correlation (0.633; p = 0.000) of all tested threshold levels. Therefore the threshold of 500 opg of E. bovis and E. zuernii can be accounted modest and reliable to detect a relevant oocyst excretion in individual faecal samples as well as in compiled samples. In cases of coincidental diarrhoea coccidiosis can be considered as a major factor. Increased numbers of days with diarrhoea in coincidence with an oocyst excretion (‘Kokass-DF’) within the observation period were seen significantly more often (p = 0.000) in animals with a potentially relevant oocyst excretion (‘rK +’) of at least 500 summed up opg of E. bovis and E. zuernii in comparison to calves without such an oocyst excretion (‘rK -‘). Significantly lower faecal scores and fewer days with diarrhoea were documented for calves of the group ‘Kok-Kat 1’ in contrast to animals of group ‘rK -‘ (p = 0.000). Nevertheless significantly higher faecal scores and more days with diarrhoea than both other groups were calculated for those calves meeting the inclusion criteria for group ‘Kok-Kat 2’ (p = 0.000 for all comparisons). Additionally liquid faeces or faeces with constituencies were seen only in this group, except for one single sample of a calf of group ‘rK -‘. Calves of evaluation group ‘rK +’ as well as both subpopulations representing group ‘Kok-Kat 2’ and calves with potentially relevant oocyst excretion but without diarrhoea associated to an oocyst excretion (‘Kok-Kat 1’) showed significant lower values for relative body weight increases in comparison to animals without relevant oocyst excretion throughout the complete study period of five weeks (‘rK -‘) (p = 0.000 vs. ‘rK +’ and vs. ‘Kok-Kat 2‘; p = 0.005 compared with ‘Kok-Kat 1’). A negative linear correlation between oocyst excretion of pathogenic Eimeria spp. and absolute (-0.098 correlation coefficient; p = 0.005) as well as relative body weight gain (-0.170 correlation coefficient) was verified statistically (p = 0.000). Animals housed on straw bedding and belonging to the group ‘rK -‘ gained relatively more body weight in comparison to calves housed in the same stables and meeting the inclusion criterium of group ‘rK +’, i.e. excreting at least 500 summed up opg of pathogenic E. spp., (p = 0.000) within the total study period. The presence of coincidental diarrhoea had no impact on impaired body weight development of animals with a potentially relevant coccidia excretion. Differences in body weight development were most distinct within the weeks of highest intensities in oocyst excretion according to a course of infection with two peaks. Within the subpopulation of dairy calves those animals belonging to evaluation group ‘rK -‘ developed significantly higher relative body weight gains compared to group ‘rK +’ (p = 0.004). Similar results were found for animals of group ‘Kok-Kat 2’ (p = 0.002) and a statistical tendency was calculated for group ‘Kok-Kat 1’ (p = 0.059) in comparison to group ‘rK -‘. Analogous to the differences in dairy calves animals on fattening farms without relevant oocyst excretion (‘rK -’) had significantly higher relative body weight gains compared to calves of evaluation group ‘rK +’ (p = 0.039) and animals of group ‘Kok-Kat 1’ (p = 0.029) of the same breeds and farms. Nine different Eimeria spp. were detected during the prevalence studies. In single individual samples a minimum of one and up to nine different species were found. Twelve Eimeria spp. are known to be endemic in Europe of which only E. brasiliensis, E. bukidnonensis and E. wyomingensis were not present in any faecal sample in this study. E. bovis and E. zuernii were only second to E. ellipsoidalis which had the highest prevalence (20.99 %) as well as the highest intensity (765963.37 mean opg) in the faecal samples examined. In breeding farms E. ellipsoidalis was the first species to be found in faecal examination in most cases, followed by E. auburnensis and the pathogenic species E. zuernii and E. bovis. E. canadensis and E. pellita were detected only in a low number of samples. E. pellita was observed for the first time at the faecal samplings five weeks after stabling and mainly in farms situated in the central and southern region of the prevalence study. E. canadensis and E. cylindrica were most prominent in farms situated in Belgium and France. Variances in prevalence of the species observed are in conformity with those to be found in recent literature according to the different regions of Europe. This may indicate a representative character of the farms participating in this study and therefore universal validity of the results and impactfactors on coccidiosis in calves described in this manuscript
Book chapters on the topic "Coccidiosis. Cattle"
Forbes, Andrew B. "Parasitic enteritis: coccidiosis." In Parasites of cattle and sheep: a practical guide to their biology and control, 102–15. Wallingford: CABI, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781789245158.0102.
Full textBangoura, B., and A. Daugschies. "Coccidiosis in Cattle." In Coccidiosis in Livestock, Poultry, Companion Animals, and Humans, 79–90. CRC Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780429294105-7.
Full text