Academic literature on the topic 'Cockcroft-Gault formula'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Cockcroft-Gault formula.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Cockcroft-Gault formula"

1

Zanoli, Luca, Giulia Romano, Marcello Romano, et al. "Renal Function and Ultrasound Imaging in Elderly Subjects." Scientific World Journal 2014 (2014): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/830649.

Full text
Abstract:
We evaluated in elderly subjects (a) the ability of GFR formulas to discriminate chronic kidney disease (CKD), (b) the correlation between renal morphology and function, and (c) the usefulness of combined r-US and GFR formulas to detect CKD. A total of 72 patients were enrolled (mean age 80 ± 7 years, male sex 44%, serum creatinine 0.98 ± 0.42 mg/dL, and CKD 57%). Cockcroft-Gault showed the highest sensitivity (78%) and specificity (94%) for CKD and was correlated with kidney volume (R=0.68,P<0.001). All formulas failed to provide a reliable estimate of GFR. In multivariate analysis, Cockcroft-Gault < 52 mL/min and kidney sinus section area < 28 cm2showed the highest accuracy for the identification of CKD subjects (AUC 0.90,P<0.001). MDRD and CKD-EPI differed significantly for GFR ≥90 mL/min.Conclusions. Cockcroft-Gault < 52 mL/min was able to discriminate subjects with CKD but all formulas failed to provide a reliable estimate of GFR. The combined use of r-US and Cockcroft-Gault formula improved the ability to discriminate CKD in elderly subjects.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Chowdhury, Jenat Zareen, Mohammad Masum Alam, and Forhadul Hoque Mollah. "Comparison of CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) formula based eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) with C-G (Cockcroft-Gaul) and MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) formula based eGFR in adult Bangladeshi population." Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal 14, no. 4 (2022): 152–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bsmmuj.v14i4.56616.

Full text
Abstract:
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the most important and accurate measure of overall kidney functions both in good health and disease because it is the sum of the filtration rates in each of the functioning nephrons .Different GFR measuring methods have some limitations.The objective of this study was to compare the CKD-EPI formula based eGFR with that of Cock- croft- Gault formula & 4 variable MDRD formula based eGFR.This Cross-sectional analytical study was done in the Department of Biochemistry & Molecular biology, BSMMU September during the period of July 2017 to August 2018. Serum creatinine was measured and eGFR by MDRD, CKD-EPI and Cockcroft-Gault formula was calculated using the respective equations on online calculator. Comparison of eGFR values between CKD-EPI & MDRD formula and between CKD-EPI & Cockcroft-Gault formula were done among different groups. Compari- son was done by Bland Altman agreement test to see the agreement on the measurement of GFR between three equation based eGFR method. Pearson‘s correlation test revealed a positive correlation between C-G and CKD-EPI (r = 0.779), but a stronger correlation between MDRD and CKD-EPI (r = 0.934). Bland-Altman plot showed strong agreement between CKD-EPI & 4–variable MDRD than between CKD-EPI & C-G formula. From this study we may conclude CKD-EPI and MDRD formula showed better agreement than between CKD-EPI and Cockcroft-Gault formula. So, this study suggests that CKD-EPI and MDRD equations can be used to estimate GFR more effectively than Cockcroft-Gault equation in Bangladeshi population. BSMMU J 2021; 14(4): 152-156
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Lavrishcheva, Y. V., A. A. Yakovenko, and A. N. Belskykh. "Criteria for assessing renal allograft dysfunction." Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy 22, no. 2 (2020): 16–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/brmma50038.

Full text
Abstract:
The significance of the glomerular filtration rate calculated by the Cockcroft - Gault formula as one of the highly sensitive criteria for assessing renal allograft dysfunction is substantiated. The study demonstrated that in the group of patients with an increased level of daily proteinuria there is a significantly lower level of serum creatine in comparison with the group of patients with a normal level of daily proteinuria. Moreover, in patients with a normal level of daily proteinuria, there are significantly higher values of glomerular filtration rate calculated by the Cockcroft - Gault formula, compared with patients with an increased level of daily proteinuria. Thus, it is shown that the level of serum creatinine currently used in clinical practice, as a laboratory marker of renal allograft dysfunction, does not allow to detect impaired renal allograft function at the earliest possible date. It has been demonstrated that the glomerular filtration rate calculated by the Cockcroft - Gault formula is a highly sensitive and specific laboratory marker of renal transplant dysfunction. Determining the glomerular filtration rate calculated by the Cockcroft - Gault formula makes it possible to diagnose renal allograft dysfunction at the earliest stages, which will significantly improve the survival of the transplanted kidney due to timely changes in patient management tactics and correction of immunosuppressive therapy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Park, E. Y., and T. Y. Kim. "The original sin of Cockcroft-Gault formula." Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 25, no. 4 (2010): 1347–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfp702.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Lavrishcheva, Yu V., and E. S. Kuvardin. "CLINICO-LABORATORY CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING DYSFUNCTION OF KIDNEY ALLOTRASPLAT FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF IMMUNOSUPRESS SCHEMES IN THE EARLY AND REMOTE PERIODS AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION." Translational Medicine 5, no. 6 (2019): 5–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2018-5-6-.

Full text
Abstract:
Background. A significant role in solving the problem of renal replacement therapy should be played by kidney transplantation, which is now widely regarded as the optimal method for treating end-stage renal failure. An important problem remains the survival of the graft, and therefore it is necessary to find the most optimal method for diagnosing the earliest lesion of the graft.Objective. Examine the possibility of using glomerular filtration rate calculated by the Cockcroft–Gault (C&G) and EPI formulas to assess renal allograft function.Design and methods. 216 patients with functioning renal allograft were examined, among them 92 women and 124 men, the average age was 56.8 ± 12.8 years. All patients completed: determination of serum creatinine level (Cr) (mmol/l), determination of the level of daily proteinuria (g/day), calculation of glomerular filtration rate using the formula EPI (ml/min) and Cockcroft–Gault formula (ml/min). All patients received immunosuppressive therapy.Results. We divided patients into 4 groups: 1 — patients without daily proteinuria with serum creatinine (Cr) < 0.110 mmol/l, 2 — patients without daily proteinuria with Cr > 0.110 mmol/l, 3 — patients with daily proteinuria less than 0.15 g/day with Cr < 0.110 mmol/l, 4 — patients with daily proteinuria more than 0.15 g/day with Cr > 0.110 mmol/l. The average Cr level was in the group 1 — 0.093 ± 0.001 mmol/l, in 2 — 0.162 ± 0.005 mmol/l, and 0.081 ± 0.002 mmol/l, and 0.135 ± 0.012 mmol/l in 3 and 4 groups, respectively. Glomerular filtration rate Cockcroft–Gault and EPI, respectively, in group 1 — 82.1 ± 4.4 ml/min and 74.9 ± 3.7 ml/min, in 2 — 55.3 ± 2.9 ml/min and 46.8 ± 2.4 ml/min, at 3 — 79.4 ± 2.8 ml/min and 71.1 ± 2.5 ml/min, at 4 — 51.2 ± 1.6 ml/min and 42.5 ± 1.2 ml/min. Сr level is not a sufficiently accurate indicator of allograft dysfunction, as in group 1 it was significantly higher than in group 3 (p < 0.01), exactly the same picture was observed when comparing groups 2 and 4. At the same time, glomerular filtration rate using the Cockcroft–Gault formula and EPI formula was slightly higher in group 3 and 4 compared with group 1 and 2.Conclusion. Calculating glomerular filtration rate using the Cockcroft–Gault formula and EPI formula is a more sensitive method for assessing renal allograft dysfunction.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Lavrishcheva, Yu V., and E. S. Kuvardin. "CLINICO-LABORATORY CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING DYSFUNCTION OF KIDNEY ALLOTRASPLAT FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF IMMUNOSUPRESS SCHEMES IN THE EARLY AND REMOTE PERIODS AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION." Translational Medicine 5, no. 6 (2019): 5–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2018-5-6-5-9.

Full text
Abstract:
Background. A significant role in solving the problem of renal replacement therapy should be played by kidney transplantation, which is now widely regarded as the optimal method for treating end-stage renal failure. An important problem remains the survival of the graft, and therefore it is necessary to find the most optimal method for diagnosing the earliest lesion of the graft.Objective. Examine the possibility of using glomerular filtration rate calculated by the Cockcroft–Gault (C&G) and EPI formulas to assess renal allograft function.Design and methods. 216 patients with functioning renal allograft were examined, among them 92 women and 124 men, the average age was 56.8 ± 12.8 years. All patients completed: determination of serum creatinine level (Cr) (mmol/l), determination of the level of daily proteinuria (g/day), calculation of glomerular filtration rate using the formula EPI (ml/min) and Cockcroft–Gault formula (ml/min). All patients received immunosuppressive therapy.Results. We divided patients into 4 groups: 1 — patients without daily proteinuria with serum creatinine (Cr) < 0.110 mmol/l, 2 — patients without daily proteinuria with Cr > 0.110 mmol/l, 3 — patients with daily proteinuria less than 0.15 g/day with Cr < 0.110 mmol/l, 4 — patients with daily proteinuria more than 0.15 g/day with Cr > 0.110 mmol/l. The average Cr level was in the group 1 — 0.093 ± 0.001 mmol/l, in 2 — 0.162 ± 0.005 mmol/l, and 0.081 ± 0.002 mmol/l, and 0.135 ± 0.012 mmol/l in 3 and 4 groups, respectively. Glomerular filtration rate Cockcroft–Gault and EPI, respectively, in group 1 — 82.1 ± 4.4 ml/min and 74.9 ± 3.7 ml/min, in 2 — 55.3 ± 2.9 ml/min and 46.8 ± 2.4 ml/min, at 3 — 79.4 ± 2.8 ml/min and 71.1 ± 2.5 ml/min, at 4 — 51.2 ± 1.6 ml/min and 42.5 ± 1.2 ml/min. Сr level is not a sufficiently accurate indicator of allograft dysfunction, as in group 1 it was significantly higher than in group 3 (p < 0.01), exactly the same picture was observed when comparing groups 2 and 4. At the same time, glomerular filtration rate using the Cockcroft–Gault formula and EPI formula was slightly higher in group 3 and 4 compared with group 1 and 2.Conclusion. Calculating glomerular filtration rate using the Cockcroft–Gault formula and EPI formula is a more sensitive method for assessing renal allograft dysfunction.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Nevins, Michael, and Michael Bright. "COCKCROFT-GAULT FORMULA FOR DIAGNOSING MODERATE KIDNEY FAILURE." Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 56, no. 4 (2008): 774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01634.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Helou, Rafik. "Should We Continue to Use the Cockcroft-Gault Formula?" Nephron Clinical Practice 116, no. 3 (2010): c172—c186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000317197.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Syvolap, V. V., and V. A. Lysenko. "Dependence of renal filtration capacity on the phenotype of chronic heart failure, indicators of systolic and diastolic heart function." Pathologia 18, no. 1 (2021): 4–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2021.1.223742.

Full text
Abstract:
The issue of changes in the filtration capacity of the kidneys depending on the structural-geometric and functional remodeling of the heart in different phenotypes of chronic heart failure, disorders of systolic and diastolic function of the left ventricle remains insufficiently studied. The aim of this work: to investigate the relationship between changes in the filtration capacity of the kidneys in patients with chronic heart failure of ischemic genesis depending on the phenotype, indicators of systolic and diastolic cardiac function. Materials and methods. After an informed consent was signed, 87 patients (men – n = 45, women – n = 42) with CHF of ischemic genesis with sinus rhythm, stage II A–B, II–IV functional class NYHA, who were divided into 2 groups, were involved in the study. Group 1 included patients with reduced (<45 %) left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n = 57; 59.6 % men), group 2 – patients with CHF with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n = 30; 36.6 % men). Patient groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, height, weight, and body surface area. Doppler echocardiographic examination was performed using the Esaote MyLab Eight (Italy). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was assessed using the CKD-EPI, MDRD, and Cockcroft-Gault formulas. Results. Renal dysfunction was registered in patients with CHF in 72 % of cases when calculated using the CKD-EPI formula, 66.7 % using the MDRD formula and 52.6 % using the Cockcroft-Gault formula. Only indicators of blood creatinine level (P = 0.011) and the calculated indicator of glomerular filtration rate according to Cockcroft-Gault (p = 0.047) depended on the types of CHF. GFR for all applied formulas (СKD-EPI, MDRD, Cockcroft-Gault) depended on age (r = -0.42; P = 0.001), height (r = 0.28; P = 0.08), weight (r = 0.31; P = 0.004), body surface area (r = 0.33; P = 0.002). A direct correlation between the creatinine level and the LV myocardial mass index, calculated using the Penn Convention formula, was established, however, the dependence of the creatinine level and GFR on the types of LV geometry was not revealed. The presence of an inverse correlation between LVEF and blood creatinine level (r = -0.3172; P = 0.003), between creatinine content and S lat (r = -0.531; Р = 0.006), a direct correlation between S lat and CKD-EPI (r = 0.5586; P = 0.004), MDRD (r = 0.6254; P = 0.001), Cockcroft-Gault (r = 0.4043; P = 0.045). Conclusions. In chronic heart failure of ischemic genesis with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, a more pronounced impairment of the filtration capacity of the kidneys than in chronic heart failure patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction is observed. An inverse correlation was established between the LV EF and the blood creatinine level (r = -0.3172; P = 0.003). A decrease in the systolic velocity of movement of the lateral annulus fibrosus of the mitral valve is associated with a decrease in the filtration capacity of the kidneys in terms of creatinine level (r = -0.531; P = 0.006), GFR according to the CKD-EPI (r = 0.5586; P = 0.004), MDRD (r = 0.6254; P = 0.001), Cockcroft-Gault (r = 0.4043; P = 0.045) in patients with CHF of ischemic genesis of both phenotypes. In patients with CHF of ischemic genesis of both phenotypes, the myocardial mass index, calculated according to the Penn Convention, correlates with the blood creatinine content (r = 0.95; P = 0.003). In patients with CHF of ischemic genesis, the restrictive type of diastolic filling of the left ventricle is associated with a significant increase in blood creatinine levels by 14 % (P = 0.03) compared with patients with diastolic LV dysfunction by the type of relaxation disorder.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Sokoll, L. J., R. M. Russell, J. A. Sadowski, and F. D. Morrow. "Establishment of creatinine clearance reference values for older women." Clinical Chemistry 40, no. 12 (1994): 2276–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/40.12.2276.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Age-adjusted reference ranges for creatinine clearance were determined in 279 women, ages 40-95 years, who were housed in a metabolic research unit and consumed a meat-free diet. Creatinine clearance, but not serum creatinine, declined with age by 0.63 mL/min per 1.73 m2 per year. Serum and urine creatinine concentrations, used to calculate clearances, were analyzed by a kinetic Jaffé procedure. In a subset of 100 subjects, fasting serum creatinine values averaged 8.3 +/- 5.2 (SD) mumol/L higher when measured by the kinetic Jaffé procedure than by an enzymatic method (creatinine PAP). The Cockcroft-Gault formula for estimating creatinine clearance from serum creatinine in women was validated, and the modification factor for the male equation was determined to be 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.83-0.86) confirming the suggested 15% correction. A prediction formula derived from this population was similar in accuracy to the Cockcroft-Gault formula.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Cockcroft-Gault formula"

1

Speeckaert, Marijn, and Jopis Delanghe. Assessment of renal function. Edited by Christopher G. Winearls. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199592548.003.0007.

Full text
Abstract:
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) can be measured as the clearance of exogenous or endogenous filtration markers. Practical formulas permit estimation of creatinine clearance or GFR without timed urine collections in many stable patients with CKD. Standardization of serum creatinine is important for all of these estimation methods and implementing traceability of the assays to the new global SRM 967 standard has led to changes in clinical decision-making criteria. Calibration to an IDMS reference produces a lowering of serum creatinine values by 10–30% for most methods. Serum creatinine concentration depends on age, gender and muscle mass. Cystatin C is an alternative marker of GFR, but estimation is more expensive and it is not clear that it has a useful place in routine practice. The MDRD Study equation was validated in the framework of the Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases study. It is superior to the Cockcroft and Gault formula for estimating Creatinine Clearance in most people. In 2009, the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula was introduced, which provides a more accurate estimation for patients with GFR values between 60 and 90 mL/min. In children, the Schwartz formula is frequently used. Some urinary markers of kidney disease are also discussed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!