Academic literature on the topic 'Coexistence with animals'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Coexistence with animals.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Coexistence with animals"
Goncu, Barika, and Vehbi Gorgulu. "University Social Responsibility Towards Sustainable Coexistence of Humans and Animals on Campus: Case Study on Bilgi Animal Friends Society." Communication Management Review 03, no. 01 (July 30, 2018): 80–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.22522/cmr20180130.
Full textSkotarczak, B., M. Adamska, M. Sawczuk, A. Maciejewska, B. Wodecka, and A. Rymaszewska. "Coexistence of tick-borne pathogens in game animals and ticks in western Poland." Veterinární Medicína 53, No. 12 (December 29, 2008): 668–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/1975-vetmed.
Full textBemis, Michael F. "Book Review: Humans and Animals: A Geography of Coexistence." Reference & User Services Quarterly 57, no. 2 (December 28, 2017): 150. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/rusq.57.2.6540.
Full textTrout, Colette. "Les animaux et nous chez Marie Darrieussecq : une coexistence indispensable." Précisions sur les sciences dans l'oeuvre de Marie Darrieussecq, no. 115 (March 3, 2020): 11–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1067880ar.
Full textHunold, Christian, and Maz Mazuchowski. "Human–Wildlife Coexistence in Urban Wildlife Management: Insights from Nonlethal Predator Management and Rodenticide Bans." Animals 10, no. 11 (October 28, 2020): 1983. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10111983.
Full textEdwards, Kyle F., and John J. Stachowicz. "Spatially stochastic settlement and the coexistence of benthic marine animals." Ecology 92, no. 5 (May 2011): 1094–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/10-1332.1.
Full textGalardi, Morgana, Marta De Santis, Roberta Moruzzo, Franco Mutinelli, and Laura Contalbrigo. "Animal Assisted Interventions in the Green Care Framework: A Literature Review." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 18 (September 7, 2021): 9431. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189431.
Full textReichman, OJ, and E. Roberts. "Computer-Simulation Analysis of Foraging by Heteromyid Rodents in Relation to Seed Distributions - Implications for Coexistence." Australian Journal of Zoology 42, no. 4 (1994): 467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/zo9940467.
Full textŁakomska, Bogna. "Images of Animals in Neolithic Chinese Ceramic." ATHENS JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES & ARTS 8, no. 1 (January 11, 2021): 63–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.30958/ajha.8-1-3.
Full textŁakomska, Bogna. "Images of Animals in Neolithic Chinese Ceramic." ATHENS JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES & ARTS 8, no. 1 (January 11, 2021): 63–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.30958/ajha.8-1-3.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Coexistence with animals"
BROWN, JOEL STEVEN. "COEXISTENCE ON A RESOURCE WHOSE ABUNDANCE VARIES: A TEST WITH DESERT RODENTS (PREDATION RISK, FORAGING BEHAVIOR, COMMUNITY STRUCTURE)." Diss., The University of Arizona, 1986. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/188178.
Full textBoháč, Ivo. "ZOO stavby - architektektura jako okno do přírody Pavilony ekosystémů." Doctoral thesis, Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta architektury, 2014. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-233269.
Full textNuttall, Daniel B. "Sustaining human and non-human animal populations, from competition to coexistence : a model." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 2002. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp05/NQ65831.pdf.
Full textHockings, Kimberley. "Human-chimpanzee coexistence at Bossou, the Republic of Guinea : a chimpanzee perspective." Thesis, University of Stirling, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1893/189.
Full textLarroque, Jeremy. "Same looks, different ecology : ecological and genetic insights on two syntopic mustelids species, the European Pine marten (Martes martes) and the Stone marten (Martes foina)." Thesis, Lyon 1, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015LYO10019.
Full textOne of the major goals of ecology is to understand the mechanisms which promote species coexistence. The niche-complementarity hypothesis predicts that two sympatric species must differ in their requirements for one of the three main ecological dimensions, i.e. habitat use, diet and activity time, to coexist. Mechanisms that allow for synthopy in terrestrial mammals are complex and varied and, among mesocarnivores, differential habitat selection is a widespread evidenced phenomenon facilitating coexistence. Plus, this differential habitat selection must have consequences on the landscape elements influencing gene flow. It is thus important to gather information on species life history traits in terms of habitat use and selection and in terms of demographic and genetic responses to environmental perturbations. The European pine marten (Martes martes) and the stone marten (Martes foina) are the most similar sympatric carnivores in Europe taking into account phylogenetic relationships, morphology, foraging behaviour, and activity pattern. In a French rural region (Bresse, eastern France) where both species are present in sympatry, we evidenced differential habitat use which could theoretically explain their sympatry. Using telemetry data set, we shown that both species differed in their resting site patterns (number of resting sites, area over which they are distributed, main habitat type used for resting). Additionally, using large data set of genotyped individuals, we found that these habitat use differences have slight consequences on the landscape elements influence on gene flow. Indeed, while we shown a differential negative impact of the trapping pressure on the spatial genetic variation, connectivity in both species is mainly provided by vegetation cover while roads human buildings and open area partially impede it. These results, collectively with morphometric comparison and population dynamics approaches, provided better insights on the pattern and the consequences of the coexistence of the two sympatric species
Castaldo-Walsh, Cynthia. "Human-Wildlife Conflict and Coexistence in a More-than-Human World: A Multiple Case Study Exploring the Human-Elephant-Conservation Nexus in Namibia and Sri Lanka." Diss., NSUWorks, 2019. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/shss_dcar_etd/134.
Full textSouza, Ludemila Martins de. "Ecologia trófica de Conopophaga lineata (Wied, 1831) e Conopophaga melanos (Vieillot, 1818) (Aves: Conopophagidae): aspectos das relações de nicho e seleção de presa." Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), 2017. https://repositorio.ufjf.br/jspui/handle/ufjf/5873.
Full textApproved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2017-10-10T12:20:05Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 ludemilamartinsdesouza.pdf: 1476036 bytes, checksum: 13c93142a0ac36c1cce3f43d89f846ca (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-10T12:20:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ludemilamartinsdesouza.pdf: 1476036 bytes, checksum: 13c93142a0ac36c1cce3f43d89f846ca (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-04-27
Dados sobre a ecologia alimentar de duas aves de sub-bosque foram coletados na Reserva Biológica Municipal do Poço D’anta, Juiz de Fora – MG, sudeste do Brasil. Conopophaga lineata e Conopophaga melanops são encontradas ocorrendo em simpátria em algumas localidades da Região Sudeste. Estudos com espécies aparentadas e simpátricas podem ser úteis no sentido de avaliar a influência do nicho sobre co ocorrência e co-existência. Durante as amostragens utilizando redes ornitológicas obtivemos 29 capturas de 25 indivíduos de C. lineata, e 28 capturas de 21 indivíduos de C. melanops. Na triagem das amostras fecais de C. lineata e C. melanops foram encontrados, respectivamente, 310 e 276 itens. C. lineata consumiu predominantemente Formicidae (53,5%), Coleoptera (6,8%). Entretanto, o índice alimentar (IA) de Coleoptera (7,47) ficou abaixo de outros grupos como Formicidae (68,2) e Araneae (8,80). C. melanops consumiu altas proporções de Formicidae (23,2%), Coloptera (12,3%), Orthoptera (11,6%) e Isoptera (11,2%), embora em termos de IA o predomínio tenha sido de Formicidae (24,66) e Coleoptera (20,14). A sobreposição de nicho entre as espécies foi maior que o esperado (observado = 0.723). Apesar das diferenças nas proporções dos tipos de artrópodes consumidos não foram suficientes para revelar separação de seus nichos alimentares. Embora se encontrem na literatura que C. lineata seleciona tanto tipo de presas quanto artrópodes maiores que 5 mm em proporções acima do esperado pelo acaso, assim como foi observado para C. melanops predação preferencial sobre alguns táxons. Os resultados encontrados demonstram que, em alguns casos, os padrões ecológicos das respostas das aves aos recursos encontrados no ambiente podem ser diferentes daqueles encontrados em outras regiões.
Data on the food ecology of two understory birds were collected at the Municipal Reserva Biológica Municipal do Poço D’anta, Juiz de Fora – MG, Southeastern Brazil. Conopophaga lineata and Conopophaga melanops are found occurring in sympatry in some localities of the Southeast Region. Studies with related and sympatric species may be useful in assessing the influence of the niche on co-occurrence and co-existence. During the samplings using ontological networks were carried out 29 catches of 25 individuals of C. lineata, and 28 catches of 21 individuals of C. melanops. In the sorting of the fecal samples of C. lineata and C. melanops were found, respectively, 310 and 276 items. C. lineata consumed predominantly Formicidae (53.5%), Coleoptera (6.8%). However, Coleoptera dietary index (AI) (7.47) was below other groups such as Formicidae (68.2) and Araneae (8.80). C. melanops consumed high proportions of Formicidae (23.2%), Coloptera (12.3%), Orthoptera (11.6%) and Isoptera (11.2%), although in terms of AI the predominance was Formicidae (24.66) and Coleoptera (20.14). The niche overlap between species was higher than expected (observed = 0.723). Although differences in the proportions of the types of arthropods consumed were not sufficient to reveal separation of their food niches. Although it is found in the literature that C. lineata selects both prey and arthropod species larger than 5 mm in proportions above that expected by chance, just as it was observed for C. melanops preferential predation on some taxa. The results show that, in some cases, the ecological patterns of bird responses to the resources found in the environment may be different from those found in other regions.
Dib, Rihab. "Compétition intra- et interspécifique chez deux parasitoïdes sympatriques : résolution des conflits et conséquences sur les stratégies d'exploitation des hôtes." Thesis, Tours, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012TOUR4025/document.
Full textWhen two species exploit the same ecological niche, interspecific competition may lead to the exclusion of one of them. For the two species to co-exist, resource exploitation strategies developed by both species must somehow counter-balance each other. Eupelmus vuilleti and Dinarmus basalis are two solitary parasitoid species exploiting the same hosts, larvae and pupae of Callosobruchus maculatus. When confronted to already parasitized hosts (i.e. exploitative competition), Eupelmus vuilleti seems to be dominant and potentially able to exclude D. basalis. Here, we aim at understanding how E. vuilleti and D. basalis can coexist when in sympatry. More particularly, we investigate the behavioral strategies adopted by females of both species when exploiting the resource (i.e. host) in presence of a competitor female (conspecific or interspecific) (i.e. interference competition). Our study reveals that in presence of a competitor female, E. vuilleti and D. basalis females display agonistic behaviors and the contest resolution is mainly influenced by the value that contestants place on the resource. Finally, under interspecific direct competition, D. basalis females tend to outcompete E. vuilleti females: they are more aggressive. In contrast, E. vuilleti females adopt a waiting strategy, waiting for the opponent female’s departure to multiparasitize hosts after committing an ovicide. Thus, both species seem to show counterbalancing strategies which could promote their coexistence in nature and granaries
Gastineau, Adrienne. "Patrons spatiaux et processus écologiques de déprédation par les grands carnivores : le cas de l’ours brun et des troupeaux domestiques en Europe de l’Ouest." Thesis, Sorbonne université, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019SORUS111.
Full textConflicts between humans and wildlife pose a threat to endangered species, which threatens their conservation worldwide. In particular, preserving large carnivores challenges the coexistence with humans. In Europe, the overlap between human activities and natural habitats is mandatory. This overlap leads sometimes to negative interactions with large carnivores. Predation on domestic herds, or depredation, is one of the main factors limiting their acceptance. Depredation is a widespread global conflict and seems particularly intense in recolonization areas. In order to reduce damage to herds, it is necessary to understand how depredation varies over space and time. The conservation of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) in the Pyrenees and the Italian Alps, populations reinforced by the translocation of Slovenian individuals, offer relevant case studies to illustrate this issue. In this thesis, I first focused on the spatial aggregation of depredation events in the French Central Pyrenees using a Getis-Ord test of spatial dependence. This analysis revealed the presence of significant brown bear depredation hotspots and the absence of cold areas. Depredation hotspots are self-correlated over time, which means that a hot spot in one year is likely to exist in subsequent years. At a finer scale, this analysis allowed the identification of inter- and intra-pasture hotspots and a simple method to rescale these results at a larger scale is proposed. Depredation has been identified as being concentrated in hotspots and linked to certain environmental characteristics ("site effect"). The objective was to identify the main landscape factors where domestic herds were most vulnerable to brown bears. The transferability of the results developed in a specific local context was assessed by comparing the Pyrenean and Alpine populations. In both populations, we analyzed brown bear activity, terrain, human infrastructure and habitat variables for the period 2010 - 2017. The results indicated that brown bear activity, grassland proportion, distance from the forest and terrain roughness are strongly associated with the risk of depredation, in similar ways in both study areas. Beyond the effects of the environment, the individual behavior of predators are likely to influence the visible patterns of depredation. The choices made by bears during their movements generate specific habitat use and selection of food items that can contribute to the creation of depredation hotspots. Thus, the characteristics of individuals' movements may be motivated by different activities such as searching for food or a breeding partner. Finally, avoiding and reducing damage from large carnivores can help to improve their conservation status by improving their tolerance by humans. A global overview of human-carnivore conflict situations has been developed to assess the effectiveness of three categories of conflict responses (non-lethal, translocations and lethal). The conclusions of this analysis are as follows: (1) conflict with carnivores is widespread and the main problems are space sharing, predation on livestock and attacks on humans; (2) non-lethal techniques have been assessed as the most effective in reducing conflicts while preserving carnivore populations; (3) conflict management documentation is often imprecise and difficult to compare between studies or situations. The proactive use of non-lethal techniques is therefore recommended to promote coexistence between humans and large carnivores. The tools developed make it possible to mitigate the impacts of conflicts and thus reinforce positive attitudes towards large carnivorous species
Broekhuis, Femke. "Niche segregation by cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) as a mechanism for co-existence with lion (Panthera leo) and spotted hyaena (Crocuta crocuta)." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2012. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:b49a3d35-1b89-4c38-91c5-10330589b2be.
Full textBooks on the topic "Coexistence with animals"
Fijn, Natasha. Living with herds: Human-animal coexistence in Mongolia. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Find full textUrbanik, Julie, and Connie L. Johnston. Humans and animals: A geography of coexistence. 2017.
Find full textRosie, Woodroffe, Thirgood S. J, and Rabinowitz Alan 1953-, eds. People and wildlife: Conflict or coexistence? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Find full textPierce, Jessica, and Marc Bekoff Ph D. The Animals' Agenda: Freedom, Compassion, and Coexistence in the Human Age. Beacon Press, 2018.
Find full textauthor, Pierce Jessica 1965, ed. The animals' agenda: Freedom, compassion, and coexistence in the Human Age. Beacon Press, 2017.
Find full textKalof, Linda, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Animal Studies. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199927142.001.0001.
Full textFijn, Natasha. Living with Herds: Human-Animal Coexistence in Mongolia. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations, 2017.
Find full textBeck, Benjamin B., Michael Hutchins, Terry L. Maple, Tara S. Stoinski, and Bryan Norton. Great Apes and Humans: The Ethics of Coexistence. Smithsonian Institution Press, 2014.
Find full textL, Knight Richard, and Gutzwiller Kevin J, eds. Wildlife and recreationists: Coexistence through management and research. Washington, D.C: Island Press, 1995.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Coexistence with animals"
Ritchie, M. "Competition and Coexistence of Mobile Animals." In Competition and Coexistence, 109–31. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56166-5_5.
Full textGilmour, Michael J. "Genesis and Peaceful Coexistence." In Animals in the Writings of C. S. Lewis, 31–60. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55298-3_2.
Full textShirae-Kurabayashi, Maki, and Akira Nakamura. "Germ-Cell Formation in Solitary Ascidians: Coexistence of Preformation and Epigenesis." In Diversity and Commonality in Animals, 3–18. Tokyo: Springer Japan, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56609-0_1.
Full textDrenthen, Martin. "Coexisting with Wolves in Cultural Landscapes: Fences as Communicative Devices." In The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, 425–44. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63523-7_23.
Full textGilmour, Michael J. "St. Francis Visits Rabbit Hill: Visions of Coexistence." In Creative Compassion, Literature and Animal Welfare, 123–56. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55430-9_5.
Full textJansman, Hugh A. H. "Animal Conservation in the Twenty-First Century." In The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, 27–45. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63523-7_2.
Full textCárdenas, César A., and Américo Montiel. "Coexistence in Cold Waters: Animal Forests in Seaweed-Dominated Habitats in Southern High-Latitudes." In Marine Animal Forests, 257–76. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21012-4_50.
Full textCárdenas, César A., and Américo Montiel. "Coexistence in Cold Waters: Animal Forests in Seaweed-Dominated Habitats in Southern High Latitudes." In Marine Animal Forests, 1–20. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17001-5_50-1.
Full textLocke, Piers. "Animals, Persons, Gods." In Conflict, Negotiation, and Coexistence, 159–79. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199467228.003.0008.
Full textTilman, David. "Interspecific competition and multispecies coexistence." In Theoretical Ecology. Oxford University Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199209989.003.0010.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Coexistence with animals"
Rodríguez González, Manuela Elizabeth. "Coherencia entre animación e imagen real: recursos presentes en el universo gráfico de Gumball." In III Congreso Internacional de Investigación en Artes Visuales :: ANIAV 2017 :: GLOCAL. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica València, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/aniav.2017.4900.
Full textReports on the topic "Coexistence with animals"
Innovative Solutions to Human-Wildlife Conflicts: National Wildlife Research Center Accomplishments, 2007. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, January 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2008.7206794.aphis.
Full text