To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Collaborative Ecosystems.
Journal articles on the topic 'Collaborative Ecosystems'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Collaborative Ecosystems.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Graça, Paula, and Luis M. Camarinha-Matos. "Assessment of Sustainable Collaboration in Collaborative Business Ecosystems." Computers 10, no. 12 (2021): 167. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/computers10120167.
Full textAbstract:
Advances in information and communication technologies and, more specifically, in artificial intelligence resulted in more intelligent systems, which, in the business world, particularly in collaborative business ecosystems, can lead to a more streamlined, effective, and sustainable processes. Following the design science research method, this article presents a simulation model, which includes a performance assessment and influence mechanism to evaluate and influence the collaboration of the organisations in a business ecosystem. The establishment of adequate performance indicators to assess the organisations can act as an influencing factor of their behaviour, contributing to enhancing their performance and improving the ecosystem collaboration sustainability. As such, several scenarios are presented shaping the simulation model with actual data gathered from three IT industry organisations running in the same business ecosystem, assessed by a set of proposed performance indicators. The resulting outcomes show that the collaboration can be measured, and the organisations’ behaviour can be influenced by varying the weights of the performance indicators adopted by the CBE manager.
2
Kääriäinen, Jukka, Katri Valkokari, Erkki Siira, Jukka Hemilä, and Marko Jurvansuu. "Toward a better understanding of collaborative research, development, and innovation (R&D&I) - exploring virtual, physical, and cognitive structures." International Journal of Innovation 11, no. 3 (2023): e22836. http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/2023.22836.
Full textAbstract:
Objective of the study: The research in this paper contributes to the understanding of how physical, virtual, and cognitive structures support innovation ecosystems’ multi-actor research, development, and innovation (R&D&I) collaboration in its different phases. Methodology/Approach: The research’s methodological approach is based on a qualitative case study research strategy. It is done by exploring three innovation ecosystem cases. The case data comprises the case ecosystems’ existing documentation that was supplemented with five semi-structured interviews. Originality/Relevance: Based on the findings of this research, it was possible to explore how industry and academy partners are collaborating through virtual, physical, and cognitive structures. Our cases also provide empirical evidence on how physical industrial sites can be used as environments for collaborative industry-academy R&D&I work. Main Results: As a result, the paper presents lessons learned from three different innovation ecosystem cases that involve industrial, technology, and academy partners to tackle industrial use cases through virtual, physical, and cognitive structures. An example of such lessons learned is assembling dynamic teams to solve industrial problems. Theoretical/Methodological Contributions: This article builds an understanding of how virtual, physical, and cognitive structures support collaboration between different participants in their joint R&D&I work covering industry-academy collaboration. The article also explains practical examples of this using innovation ecosystem cases. Management/Social Contributions: The findings of this study may benefit professionals and managers who have an interest in understanding collaborative R&D&I and how physical, virtual, and cognitive structures can support it. Furthermore, the results provide means and experiences for innovation ecosystem managers to facilitate the definition of operational models suitable for the context of their innovation ecosystems.
3
Avdokushin, Evgenii F., and Elena G. Kuznetsova. "ECOSYSTEMS OF THE SHARING ECONOMY." RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Economics. Management. Law, no. 4 (2021): 83–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2021-4-83-100.
Full textAbstract:
The article analyzes the state and prospects of creating ecosystems in the sharing model – the economy of collaborative consumption (CCE) and sharing (SE). The authors show that the creation of ecosystems is most promising in the SE segment, although individual ecosystems can be formed and used in the CCE segment. Examples of foreign and Russian experience in creating such ecosystems are considered. The article provides a critical analysis of the points of view of foreign authors on the mixing of the principles of the functioning of the sharing economy and the cooperative, collaborative activities of companies. Sharing in many foreign publications is often commercialized while ignoring or obscuring its social essence. Sharing ecosystems are equated to the ecosystems of large corporations (financial, bigtechs), which, as the practice of their functioning testifies, lead to monopolization. At the same time, the sharing model, identified with simple cooperation, collaboration, “fits” into the model of a modern market economy. In Russia, ecosystems are created more often on the basis of large banks, and abroad on the basis of bigtechs. The marketplace model plays a significant role in the formation of ecosystems. In Russia, few of the companies operating according to the sharing model manage to create their own ecosystem, especially in the CCE segment.
4
Schreiber, Roland Robert. "Organizational Influencers in Open-Source Software Projects." International Journal of Open Source Software and Processes 14, no. 1 (2023): 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijossp.318400.
Full textAbstract:
Traditional software development is shifting toward the open-source development model, particularly in the current environment of competitive challenges to develop software openly. The author employs a case study approach to investigate how organizations and their affiliated developers collaborate in the open-source software (OSS) ecosystem TensorFlow (TF). The analysis of the artificial intelligence OSS library TF combines social network analysis (SNA) and an examination of archival data by mining software repositories. The study looks at the structure and evolution of code-collaboration among developers and with the ecosystem's organizational networks over the TF lifespan. These involved organizations play a particularly critical role in development. The research also looks at productivity, homophily, development, and diversity among developers. The results deepen the understanding of OSS communities' collaborative developer and organization patterns. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the importance and evolution of social networks, diversity, and productivity in ecosystems.
5
Hou, Xiaona, Xiangxiao Gao, Shi Yin, and Jianmin Li. "A three evolutionary game model for driving mechanism of industry-university-research collaborative innovation in agricultural innovation ecosystems." PLOS ONE 18, no. 8 (2023): e0289408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289408.
Full textAbstract:
Based on the current state of China’s agricultural industry, this article proposes an integrated framework for the agricultural innovation ecosystem in developing countries. Furthermore, a dynamic simulation model is constructed to analyze the game process and factors influencing the agricultural innovation ecosystem. The results indicate that industry-university-research collaboration serves as the main source of innovation within the agricultural innovation ecosystem, playing a central role in its development. The willingness to participate, cost of participation, and establishment of default fees by governments, agro-related enterprises, universities, and research institutions have significant implications for the evolution of collaborative innovation within agricultural innovation ecosystems. In order to promote the evolution of the system, agriculture-related enterprises, universities, and research institutions should establish more effective reward and punishment mechanisms, as well as cost control mechanisms. Governments should set reasonable regulatory costs and incentive intervals to actively foster a collaborative innovation atmosphere. The innovation points of this paper are as follows: extending the theory of innovation ecosystems to agriculture, particularly in developing countries characterized by imbalanced and insufficient development. A game model is also constructed to represent the collaborative innovation evolution among government, agriculture-related enterprises, universities, and research institutions, with the government as the endogenous variable. Through numerical simulation, the dynamic evolution process of collaborative innovation within the agricultural innovation ecosystem is revealed. This research enriches and expands upon innovation ecosystem theory, providing guidance for the of innovation ecology in agriculture through mathematical models in developing countries. This, in turn, promotes the convergence of symbiotic, shared, and-creation development.
6
Oluwatamilore Popo- Olaniyan, Oladapo Olakunle James, Chioma Ann Udeh, Rosita Ebere Daraojimba, and Damilola Emmanuel Ogedengbe. "REVIEW OF ADVANCING U.S. INNOVATION THROUGH COLLABORATIVE HR ECOSYSTEMS: A SECTOR-WIDE PERSPECTIVE." International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research 4, no. 12 (2023): 623–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v4i12.675.
Full textAbstract:
This paper provides a review of the collaborative HR ecosystems involving government, business, academia, and practitioners in the U.S. It assesses the impact of these collaborations on national innovation, their role in setting global HR standards, and their contribution to strengthening the U.S.'s position in the global economic landscape. In the pursuit of advancing innovation within the United States, the collaborative synergy within Human Resources (HR) ecosystems emerges as a pivotal factor. It delves into the intricate dynamics of fostering innovation through collaborative HR ecosystems from a sector-wide perspective. By examining various industries, the paper explores how the collective efforts of HR professionals, organizational leaders, and diverse stakeholders contribute to the cultivation of innovation. The analysis encompasses the strategic role of HR in talent management, the impact of collaborative approaches on workforce diversity and inclusion, and the integration of cutting-edge technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) in shaping the future of HR practices. Additionally, the review addresses the challenges and ethical considerations associated with collaborative HR ecosystems and provides insights into potential strategies for overcoming these hurdles. By presenting a sector-wide perspective, this review aims to illuminate the multifaceted landscape of collaborative HR ecosystems and their profound influence on fueling innovation across diverse industries within the United States.
 Keywords: Human Resources, Artificial Intelligence, USA, Innovation, Ecosystem.
7
Roundy, Philip T., and Mark A. Bayer. "To bridge or buffer? A resource dependence theory of nascent entrepreneurial ecosystems." Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies 11, no. 4 (2019): 550–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jeee-06-2018-0064.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose Vibrant entrepreneurial ecosystems, systems of inter-related forces that promote and sustain regional entrepreneurship, are increasingly viewed as sources of innovation, economic development and community revitalization. Regions with emerging, underdeveloped or depressed economies are attempting to develop their nascent entrepreneurial ecosystems in the hopes of experiencing the positive benefits of entrepreneurial activity. For nascent entrepreneurial ecosystems to grow requires resources. However, how nascent entrepreneurial ecosystems manage their resource dependencies and the tensions that exist between creating and attracting resources are not clear. The purpose of this paper is to propose a theory of nascent entrepreneurial ecosystem resource dependence. Design/methodology/approach This conceptual paper analyzes entrepreneurial ecosystems as meta-organizations and builds on resource dependence theory to explain how nascent ecosystems respond to environmental dependencies and their resource needs through internal and external strategies. Findings Two specific strategies used by nascent entrepreneurial ecosystems to manage resource dependence – bridging and buffer – are explored. It is proposed that there is a positive relationship between the resource dependence of a nascent entrepreneurial ecosystem and its use of bridging and buffering activities. Two ecosystem characteristics that influence the pursuit of bridging and buffering – ecosystem size and the presence of collaborative values – are also identified. In addition, it is theorized that resource dependence strategies influence a key, system-level characteristic of entrepreneurial ecosystems: resilience, the ecosystem’s ability to respond and adapt to internal and external disruptions. Originality/value The theory presented generates insights into how nascent entrepreneurial ecosystems create and obtain resources when ecosystems are unmunificent, resource-constrained or underdeveloped. The theorizing addresses which resource dependence strategy – buffering or bridging – has a stronger link to resource dependence (and resilience) and under what conditions these linkages occur. The theoretical model generates insights for research on entrepreneurship in emerging and developed economies and produces practical implications for ecosystem participants, policymakers and economic development organizations.
8
Ng, Wai-Kit, Shi Chen, Wei-Hung Chen, Chun-Liang Chen, and Jhih-Ling Jiang. "Mobile Payment Innovation Ecosystem and Mechanism: A Case Study of Taiwan’s Servicescapes." Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 19, no. 1 (2024): 633–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19010034.
Full textAbstract:
This paper examines how businesses in Taiwan’s servicescapes are adapting to the growing trend of mobile payments and innovation ecosystems. Through the analysis of four case studies, we uncover the strategies these firms employ to address the challenges posed by changing consumer payment habits. Our research reveals that these companies are establishing efficient mechanisms within their ecosystems, supported by well-structured organizational frameworks. By leveraging innovation ecosystems, they are reshaping financial services and promoting collaborative growth among participants through technology, platforms, resource sharing, and knowledge exchange. This collaborative approach is driving significant changes in the sector, helping these businesses navigate through various challenges while fostering innovation and growth. Additionally, the scarcity of comprehensive observations of the digital payment ecosystem highlights the necessity for further exploration of actor interactions, regulatory mechanisms, and ecosystem management strategies. Such research efforts are crucial for enhancing our understanding of the evolving landscape of digital payments and innovation ecosystems, facilitating informed decision-making and promoting sustainable development in this dynamic industry.
9
Adu-Kankam, Kankam O., and Luis M. Camarinha-Matos. "Modeling Collaborative Behaviors in Energy Ecosystems." Computers 12, no. 2 (2023): 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/computers12020039.
Full textAbstract:
The notions of a collaborative virtual power plant ecosystem (CVPP-E) and a cognitive household digital twin (CHDT) have been proposed as contributions to the efficient organization and management of households within renewable energy communities (RECs). CHDTs can be modeled as software agents that are designed to possess some cognitive capabilities, enabling them to make autonomous decisions on behalf of their human owners based on the value system of their physical twin. Due to their cognitive and decision-making capabilities, these agents can exhibit some behavioral attributes, such as engaging in diverse collaborative actions aimed at achieving some common goals. These behavioral attributes can be directed to the promotion of sustainable energy consumption in the ecosystem. Along this line, this work demonstrates various collaborative practices that include: (1) collaborative roles played by the CVPP manager such as (a) opportunity seeking and goal formulation, (b) goal proposition/invitation to form a coalition or virtual organization, and (c) formation and dissolution of coalitions; and (2) collaborative roles played by CHDTs which include (a) acceptance or decline of an invitation based on (i) delegation/non-delegation and (ii) value system compatibility/non-compatibility, and (b) the sharing of common resources. This study adopts a simulation technique that involves the integration of multiple simulation methods such as system dynamics, agent-based, and discrete event simulation techniques in a single simulation environment. The outcome of this study confirms the potential of adding cognitive capabilities to CHDTs and further shows that these agents could exhibit certain collaborative attributes, enabling them to become suitable as rational decision-making agents in households.
10
Hernandez-Almazan, Jorge-Arturo, Ricardo Chalmeta, Ramón Ventura Roque-Hernández, and Rubén Machucho-Cadena. "A Framework to Build a Big Data Ecosystem Oriented to the Collaborative Networked Organization." Applied Sciences 12, no. 22 (2022): 11494. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app122211494.
Full textAbstract:
A Collaborative Networked Organization (CNO) is a set of entities that operate in heterogeneous contexts and aim to collaborate to take advantage of a business opportunity or solve a problem. Big data allows CNOs to be more competitive by improving their strategy, management and business processes. To support the development of big data ecosystems in CNOs, several frameworks have been reported in the literature. However, these frameworks limit their application to a specific CNO manifestation and cannot conduct intelligent processing of big data to support decision making at the CNO. This paper makes two main contributions: (1) the proposal of a metaframework to analyze existing and future frameworks for the development of big data ecosystems in CNOs and (2) to show the Collaborative Networked Organizations–big data (CNO-BD) framework, which includes guidelines, tools, techniques, conceptual solutions and good practices for the building of a big data ecosystem in different kinds of Collaborative Networked Organizations, overcoming the weaknesses of previous issues. The CNO-BD framework consists of seven dimensions: levels, approaches, data fusion, interoperability, data sources, big data assurance and programmable modules. The framework was validated through expert assessment and a case study.
11
Zeinelabdin Karrar, Azza, and Azizah Abdul Rahman. "Collaborative Mobile Money Service Provision: Recommendations for National Issues." International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7, no. 3.20 (2018): 304. http://dx.doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.20.19171.
Full textAbstract:
Recently, the developing countries are considering the development of mobile money ecosystems that supports more inclusive financial systems to overcome the high financial exclusion of their population. Such ecosystems can be enabled by facilitating the collaboration between diverse stakeholders from different sectors: financial, telecommunication, regulatory bodies and IT service providers. This development of mobile money ecosystem emphasized on considering existing issues of main stakeholders’ and their conflicting interests. The aim of this paper is to discuss set of recommendations that can help in resolving national issues when participating in collaborative mobile money ecosystem. The research used the Sudanese national mobile money project as case study. The data collection method was qualitative interpretive interviews with different stakeholders in different sectors in Sudan. The researchers analyzed the collected data using qualitative data analysis approach. The results of the analysis focus on representing the multiple perspectives of stakeholders on each identified government’s issue. The research identified six national issues and the interrelation between these issues. The identified issues are: non utilized huge deposits, accountability of big transactions amount, strict customer registration procedures, unsatisfying batch processing, responsibility of customer management and monitoring international remittances. These findings contribute toward better understanding to the mobile money ecosystem in Sudan from government’s perspective. This understanding can facilitate building successful value propositions between mobile money stakeholders which can results in better financial services.
12
Berube, Linda. "Digital Comics Ecosystems: Building Personalized Creative Ecosystems." ACM SIGWEB Newsletter 2025, Spring (2025): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3736244.3736248.
Full textAbstract:
Linda Berube is a visiting lecturer at City St. George's, University of London where she completed her doctoral research. The research was funded through the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council's Collaborative Doctoral Programme, in partnership with The British Library and the Centre for Human-Computer Interaction Design (HCID) at City St George's, University of London. Supervisors were Dr. Ernesto Priego and Dr. Stephann Makri from HCID, and Ian Cooke and Stella Wisdom from the British Library.
13
Greer, Meredith L., Holly A. Ewing, Kathryn L. Cottingham, and Kathleen C. Weathers. "Collaborative Understanding of Cyanobacteria in Lake Ecosystems." College Mathematics Journal 44, no. 5 (2013): 376–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.4169/college.math.j.44.5.376.
Full text
14
Jariya, Ritik, Pooja Hardiya, and Shraddha Kumar. "Addressing Challenges in Human-AI Collaborative Ecosystems." INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT 09, no. 04 (2025): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem43438.
Full textAbstract:
The proposed work focuses on identifying and addressing critical challenges in human-AI collaborative ecosystems. These challenges include ethical concerns, technological limitations, and societal trust deficits, which have emerged as significant barriers to the effective integration of AI systems in human-centric processes. The study delves into the ethical dimensions of AI, emphasizing the need for frameworks that ensure fairness, accountability, and transparency. Additionally, the research explores technological advancements, particularly the potential of quantum computing and neuromorphic engineering, to revolutionize human-AI interactions by enhancing computational efficiency and adaptability. Furthermore, this work highlights societal implications, such as public skepticism and disparities in access to AI technologies, proposing strategies to foster trust and equity. Through a comprehensive analysis of case studies and theoretical insights, the study aims to develop robust, interdisciplinary frameworks that not only address existing challenges but also pave the way for future innovation. By bridging gaps between ethical considerations, technological capabilities, and societal needs, the proposed research endeavors to establish sustainable and impactful human-AI partnerships.
15
Harper-Anderson, Elsie. "Intersections of Partnership and Leadership in Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Comparing Three U.S. Regions." Economic Development Quarterly 32, no. 2 (2018): 119–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891242418763727.
Full textAbstract:
Entrepreneurial ecosystems have become a focal point for regional innovation and growth. Much of the scholarship on ecosystems has focused on identifying key components and understanding factors influencing the entrepreneurial process. While scholars have acknowledged the importance of connection as the means through which information, knowledge, and resources are shared, most of the discussion has focused on entrepreneurs as the unit of analysis with limited attention to connections between entrepreneurial support organizations. This comparative analysis examines partnership and leadership among entrepreneurial support organizations in Chicago, Pittsburgh, and Richmond. The author argues that differences in partnership practices across the cases are in part a function of the unique leadership models shaping each ecosystem’s cultural and institutional norms. Understanding the role of leadership could be critical for shaping the collaborative environments for which most ecosystem stakeholders are hoping.
16
Shmeleva, Nadezhda, Tatyana Tolstykh, and Olga Dudareva. "Integration as a Driver of Enterprise Sustainability: The Russian Experience." Sustainability 15, no. 12 (2023): 9606. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su15129606.
Full textAbstract:
The current geopolitical map, facing challenges and disruptions to industrial-technological relations, requires transformation the processes of interaction between economic agents and the building of collaborative links through the implementation of ecosystem models. The aim of the article is to assess the resilience of industrial ecosystems by determining the collaborative maturity, resource stability and technological resilience of actors. The article presents a typology of integration forms between industrial enterprises based on symbiotic relationships. The concept of ecosystem symbiosis is introduced. The authors propose a methodology for assessing industrial ecosystem sustainability, distinguished by the approach to the formation of an integral indicator consisting of three components: stability (invulnerability), resilience (reliability) and ecosystem (coherence). The composite index method, fuzzy sets method, preference ordering by similarity to the ideal solution, rank sum method, fuzzy k-means clustering method, least squares method, Gaussian method, and variance and multiple regression analyses were used in developing the methodology for stability assessment. The approach is demonstrated by the example of three industrial ecosystems in the Voronezh, Belgorod and Lipetsk regions of the Russian Federation. As a result of the analysis, it was found that ecosystem’s sustainability was achieved, primarily due to the factors of resilience and reliability, which had the maximum impact on the integrated sustainability indicator. The propositions arising from this analysis provide information on the industrial integrations with the highest and the lowest sustainability, to provide academics, policymakers and industrial enterprises with a more adequate understanding of the practical mechanisms that help trigger sustainable development.
17
SONG, HUA, SIJIE CHEN, and ANIRBAN GANGULY. "INNOVATIVE ECOSYSTEM IN ENHANCING HI-TECH SME FINANCING: MEDIATING ROLE OF TWO TYPES OF INNOVATION CAPABILITIES." International Journal of Innovation Management 24, no. 02 (2019): 2050017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s1363919620500176.
Full textAbstract:
With the development of technological innovation and global economic integration, high-tech enterprises across the world have formed numerous innovation ecosystems with similar natural ecological characteristics. As a result, competition has shifted from single enterprise to supply chain network, and ultimately, to innovation ecosystem, which involves more participants and roles across multiple industries. The current study distinguished two innovation capabilities (internal innovation potential and collaborative open innovation), and two sources of innovation capabilities (internal integration and external integration) along with discussing the specific relationships among integration activities, innovation capabilities, and Hi-tech SMEs’ financing performance. It further explored how interactions between within and cross firm-boundary activities and collaboration exert influence on SMEs’ financing performance and manifested the importance of external collaborative networks to the competitiveness of SMEs.
18
Öberg, Christina, and Heléne Lundberg. "Mechanisms of knowledge development in a knowledge ecosystem." Journal of Knowledge Management 26, no. 11 (2022): 293–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jkm-11-2021-0814.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose Although ecosystems have been researched extensively over the past decade, we know little about how they should be organised. Focusing on a knowledge ecosystem comprising a university and a regional strategic network (RSN), this paper aims to describe and discuss the mechanisms for knowledge development in knowledge ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach This paper studies the integration of a university into a Swedish RSN. Data were collected through interviews with representatives of the university, the RSN and all firms comprising the RSN. A qualitative content analysis helped to detect mechanisms for knowledge development. Findings Two reinforcing mechanisms for knowledge development in the knowledge ecosystem are identified: structure and openness, which relate to insight and outlook, respectively. The findings also indicate a knowledge division, with the university representing the transfer of knowledge capabilities as a linear process, whereas the content-related knowledge is collaborative. Originality/value This paper contributes to research on knowledge ecosystems by describing how their organisation is based on a number of contradictions (structure and openness, insight and outlook, linearity and collaboration) to accomplish the development of knowledge capabilities and content-related knowledge.
19
Engez, Anil, Seppo Leminen, and Leena Aarikka-Stenroos. "Urban Living Lab as a Circular Economy Ecosystem: Advancing Environmental Sustainability through Economic Value, Material, and Knowledge Flows." Sustainability 13, no. 5 (2021): 2811. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13052811.
Full textAbstract:
Environmental sustainability is an increasingly relevant aspect of urban living labs. The objective of this study is to examine an urban living lab through ecosystem approach lenses and reveal the actor activities and diverse flows between them, enabling sustainable urban development. The study examines an urban area through four living lab projects in the Hiedanranta district in Tampere in Finland. We apply a qualitative research design strategy including semi-structured interviews reinforced with the project reports and websites. The collaboration and co-creation nature of living labs resembles an ecosystem structure, as both include diverse complementary actors and have distinctive coordination mechanisms, shared goals, and system-level outcomes. Building on the ecosystem analogy and circular economy ecosystem typology, our study examines living labs as ecosystems, enabling the economic value flow, material flow, and knowledge flow and pursuing the shared goal of improved environmental sustainability. The findings of the study demonstrate how the different ecosystem types manifest in urban living labs, and the actors, flows, and outcomes in these ecosystems. The study concludes that urban sustainability-oriented living labs comprise all main types of circular economy ecosystems. The dominant type of the activities (biased to economic value, material, or knowledge) determines the ecosystem type in an urban living lab, highlighting a key topic for future research: The contribution of collaborative projects to environmental sustainability in urban living labs realized through diverse ecosystem types.
20
Hruskova, Michaela. "It Takes a Village to Build an Ecosystem: Collaborative Governance of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems." Academy of Management Proceedings 2020, no. 1 (2020): 19639. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2020.19639abstract.
Full text
21
Brink, Tove. "Future Sensemaking Beyond Own Business Self-Interests: Insights from Offshore Wind Energy Innovation Ecosystems." Energies 17, no. 18 (2024): 4649. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en17184649.
Full textAbstract:
This research explores how participants in an innovation ecosystem, operating without a focal firm, can collaboratively envision and create societal value beyond their individual business goals. Using participatory action research, the investigation focuses on two cases within the offshore wind energy sector, involving four complementary enterprises and nine enterprises that are both complementary and competitive. The findings suggest that ecosystem participants can collectively pursue opportunities for sustainable value creation that surpass the interests and goals of individual firms. This shift towards a future-oriented, ecosystem-wide perspective was driven by the focus on ecosystem-level value propositions and the dynamic organizing of heterogeneous knowledge, individual behaviors, and organizational behaviors, enabling successful future-oriented sensemaking. The research process highlights practices that led to significant innovation outcomes, such as halving investments, reducing accidents and rework, accelerating operational flow, and fostering long-term investments, like a floating port for installation and maintenance improvements. This study enhances understanding of how future-oriented sensemaking in innovation ecosystems without a focal firm can drive innovation and societal value creation, offering insights for practitioners, academics, and policymakers on governance and collaborative efforts to enable value creation in innovation ecosystems.
22
Ismanto, Dodi Robby Hari, and Rachma Fitriati. "Collaborative Governance of Coral Reef Management and Rehabilitation in Tsunami Disaster Mitigation Efforts." Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik 10, no. 1 (2020): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v10i1.14055.
Full textAbstract:
The tsunami is the biggest threat to countries around the world tectonic plates and the ring of fire, including Indonesia. The impact of economic losses and heavy casualties made the tsunami worth watching out. Ecosystem-based tsunami disaster mitigation efforts are deemed necessary, considering that 2/3 of Indonesia consists of the sea. The coral reef is one of the coastal ecosystems that can reduce tsunami waves by up to 50% before it hits coastal areas. However, the current condition of coral reefs is very alarming due to the actions of irresponsible humans. Collaboration between stakeholders is needed to carry out ecosystem-based tsunami disaster mitigation efforts. Collaborative governance becomes an essential issue in efforts to build and improve services in the public sector by involving all relevant stakeholders. The sectoral ego of the stakeholders is no longer relevant to be maintained because each actor has their strengths and weaknesses. Collaboration between actors framed in a collaboration platform by having a principled engagement, shared motivation, and collective capacity will produce better results.
23
RIKKIEV, ANDREI, and SAKU J. MÄKINEN. "TECHNOLOGY CONVERGENCE AND INTERCOMPANY R&D COLLABORATION: ACROSS BUSINESS ECOSYSTEMS BOUNDARIES." International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 10, no. 04 (2013): 1350009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0219877013500090.
Full textAbstract:
Technology-based industry convergence brings forth new competence-destroying technologies, increases product complexity and drives companies to enter into collaborative R&D arrangements outside their current business ecosystems. The technology-based convergence context is classified as technology substitution and technology integration convergence types, and requires new collaborative competencies spanning business ecosystems that are not identified in the current literature. This paper explores the critical success factors (CSFs) of inter-company R&D collaboration in different types of convergence projects. The study finds that the convergence types are differentiated by their focal areas: product features, relative product advantage and market need orientation. We further discuss the important CSFs of the convergence types and provide insights for managers in our results.
24
Vincentius Varrel, Siti Juhriah Novianty, and Paundra Hanutama. "Impact Analysis and Development of Collaborative Communication Models in Public Relations Programs for Mangrove Conservation." Ilomata International Journal of Social Science 5, no. 1 (2024): 88–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v5i1.1075.
Full textAbstract:
Mangrove forests, as coastal ecosystems, play a crucial role in maintaining the sustainability of fishery resources and protecting shores from erosion and storms. However, mangrove degradation continues to escalate, primarily due to human activities such as shrimp pond expansion and uncontrolled logging. Public Relations programs can serve as effective tools to raise awareness and engage communities in mangrove conservation. Impact analysis and the development of a collaborative communication model are key to understanding the effectiveness of such programs. This research aims to analyze the impact of the Public Relations program on mangrove conservation and develop a more effective collaborative communication model. The focus is on understanding behavioral changes, community responses, and the program's contribution to the sustainability of the mangrove ecosystem. The research methodology employed is qualitative-descriptive with an impact analysis approach. Interviews with representatives from local communities, local governments, non-governmental organizations, and Public Relations practitioners were conducted to gather data. Content analysis was also performed on the program's communication materials. The research findings indicate that the Public Relations program has positively impacted the increase in community awareness and behavioral changes related to mangrove conservation. However, challenges persist concerning environmental uncertainties and the lack of participation from certain segments of the community. A collaborative communication model integrated with mangrove conservation theories, impact analysis, and community engagement proves essential for further improvement. The implications of this research reflect the importance of impact analysis and developing collaborative communication models in Public Relations programs for mangrove conservation. These findings underline that active collaboration with various stakeholders is key to ensuring the sustainability of mangrove ecosystems.
25
Jirasatayaporn, Phruek, Waraporn Srisupan, Shutima Saeng-ngern, and Sansanee Choowaew. "The Development of a Learning Unit to Promote Biodiversity Utilization in Agricultural Ecosystems." Journal of Education and Learning 14, no. 2 (2024): 139. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jel.v14n2p139.
Full textAbstract:
The objectives of this research were to 1) develop a learning unit to promote biodiversity use in agricultural ecosystems, 2) assess student learning outcomes related to their knowledge of biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems and to their skills of knowledge management, and 3) evaluate the impacts of learning to manage biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems on cultivators. Agriculture is a major occupation in Thailand. Knowledge about utilizing biodiversity in an agricultural ecosystem is essential for safe food consumption. Teachers play a vital role in developing and managing learning opportunities for cultivators, leading to participatory learning. Important components of learning management are teachers, learning sources in the local community, learning units about managing agricultural ecosystem biodiversity, and collaborative learning assessments for developing the learning units. This study develops learning outcomes at secondary schools to address the use of biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems along with agricultural methods and teaching skills related to sustainable agricultural learning management. Teaching skills have been improved through the guideline Encouraging Learning Outcomes for Biodiversity in Agricultural Ecosystems, in accordance with the sustainable development goals of the United Nations.
26
Hannah, Douglas. "Collaborative Strategy and Value Capture in Innovation Ecosystems." Academy of Management Proceedings 2018, no. 1 (2018): 11498. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2018.196.
Full text
27
Sharmelly, Rifat, and Pradeep Kanta Ray. "The role of frugal innovation and collaborative ecosystems." Journal of General Management 43, no. 4 (2018): 157–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306307018762698.
Full textAbstract:
This article examines the product innovation management strategy of a developed economy multinational corporation case in India. Drawing on institutional theory, the analysis indicates that product innovation for emerging markets is essentially built on the frugal innovation capabilities of a firm. The findings show that through frugal engineering, bricolage, and modularity, it is possible to implement frugal innovation that creates value with less resource and at low costs. Further, the analysis shows how developing a collaborative ecosystem along with a deep embeddedness in the local economy facilitates frugal innovation. The article has important implications for theory and management practice.
28
Corsi, Charles E., Matthew P. Corsi, Kenneth E. Wallen, et al. "From fragments to connections to restoration: A case history of emergent sociocultural services in the Clark Fork River and Lake Pend Oreille fishery." Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 25, no. 1 (2022): 6–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.14321/aehm.025.01.06.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Lake Pend Oreille and the Clark Fork River provide essential ecosystem services, including fisheries and hydroelectric power, to residents of Montana, Idaho, and Washington. Although conflicts exist, these services are maintained in concert by emergent sociocultural services created by a multi-institutional, transboundary collaboration. This has been enabled by an innovative Federal Energy Regulatory Commission license settlement agreement among a multitude of stakeholders. The consensus-based agreement promotes connections among people, projects, waterways, and fish populations. Collaborative management efforts allow stakeholders to address controversial issues, such as invasive fish suppression. We demonstrate how reciprocal cultural ecosystem services and services to ecosystems can enable ecosystem-scale restoration that addresses invasive species, habitat protection, and water quality management. Continued ecosystem management success relies on sustaining the relationship-building and shared knowledge services that have emerged over the past 25 years.
29
Sun, Jiawei. "The CSR practices of Western Australian mining based on innovation ecosystems: Pathways to collaborative innovation and sustainable development." International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies 8, no. 2 (2025): 4189–96. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i2.6263.
Full textAbstract:
This study investigates the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices of Western Australian mining companies, focusing on their integration of innovation ecosystems to promote sustainable development. Through case studies of BHP Group, Rio Tinto, FMG, and South32, the research examines how these companies reduce carbon emissions, enhance community development, and foster collaborative innovation. The findings highlight the significant role of innovation ecosystems in enabling these companies to adopt cleaner technologies, improve social outcomes, and maintain a competitive edge in a sustainability-conscious global market. The study also explores the challenges and opportunities faced by mining companies in leveraging collaborative innovation to address complex environmental and social issues. This research contributes to the understanding of CSR in the mining industry and offers practical insights for improving sustainability practices through innovation-driven collaboration.
30
Chotimah, Hidayat Chusnul, Muhammad Ridha Iswardhana, and Lucitania Rizky. "Model Collaborative Governance dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Plastik Laut Guna Mewujudkan Ketahanan Maritim di Indonesia." Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional 27, no. 3 (2022): 348. http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/jkn.69661.
Full textAbstract:
Plastic pollution waste has become one of the world crisis that moves transboundary. Once at sea, plastic waste breaks down into small particles, so-called, microplastics are spread the marine ecosystems. It threatens human health and has harmful economic consequences for the marine sector. Indonesia is the second-largest contributor to the abundance of plastic waste in the ocean which in the same time as an archipelago country which rich in marine products. Indonesia is taking proactive steps as the responsible act for overcoming challenge of marine plastic pollution. So, the maritime environment resilience can be realized through a collaborative governance approach. This study uses a qualitative approach by collecting data from interviews, webinars and literature studies. The results of the study indicate that a collaborative governance approach is crucial to address marine plastic pollution by involving collaborating action from multi-stakeholders, government and non-government actors. Plastic pollution waste could be accomplished by strengthening the role and responsibility of each actor. In the process of collaboration, there are some dialogues, trust between the collaborating actors, commitment to the process of collaboration, shared understanding towards the common idea or goals, and intermediate outcome of collaboration between stakeholders in marine plastic waste management.
31
Zhao, Yan, and Zheng Yang. "Research on collaborative innovation optimization strategies for digitally enabled higher education ecosystems." PLOS ONE 19, no. 4 (2024): e0302285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302285.
Full textAbstract:
Digitally enabled higher education involves the in-depth use of new-generation digital technology, which has subverted and innovated the traditional teaching mode, driven the development of high-quality teaching and learning, and improved teachers’ teaching experience, and increased efficiency. Based on ecosystem theory, this paper constructs a higher education ecosystem with the government, enterprises, and universities as the core participating subjects. It considers the participating subjects’ effort level and the ecosystem’s overall benefits under the three scenarios of noncooperative research and development (R&D), cost sharing, and cooperative R&D. The results show that (1) the service innovation effort level of the three parties increases with increasing human resource level and technology maturity, and the government’s benefit decreases with increasing cost of fulfilling social responsibility. (2) The government’s cost subsidies to universities and enterprises can enhance the service innovation level of both parties and increase the optimal returns of the three parties and the ecosystem as a whole. (3) In the cooperative R&D game scenario, the effort level of the three parties and the total ecosystem returns are greater than those in the noncollaborative R&D scenario, and after determining the subsidy coefficients of the government, Pareto optimality of the three parties and the ecosystem as a whole can be achieved. The conclusions of this study can aid in understanding the dynamic evolution mechanism of digitally enabled higher education and provide a realistic decision-making reference for higher education ecosystem managers.
32
Thiessen Martens, Joanne. "Restoring social and ecological relationships in the agroecosystems of Canada's prairie region." Outlook on Agriculture 51, no. 1 (2022): 55–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00307270221077356.
Full textAbstract:
Ecosystem restoration is proposed as one aspect of the transformative changes required to meet global sustainability goals. In the prairie region of Canada, where the widespread and relatively recent conversion of natural ecosystems to farmland displaced Indigenous peoples and made way for a thriving agricultural sector, I propose that ecosystem restoration requires two intertwined transition processes: reorienting worldviews to embrace the social and biophysical contexts of local ecosystems, and taking practical steps to restore ecosystem functioning and integrity. Attention to ecosystem functioning—the relational processes that undergird the desired outcomes—can promote the design and implementation of agricultural landscapes that mimic key features of natural ecosystems while maintaining a mix of land uses. Human ingenuity and thoughtful integration of traditional and scientific knowledge are needed to develop locally adapted land use that supports synergetic relationships within and among farm fields and other landscape features. Integrating social goals into the design of agricultural landscapes can spawn creative solutions but will require a shift toward a more open and collaborative approach, especially regarding the use of privately owned lands.
33
NARLEV, Yuliyan. "Entrepreneurship Ecosystems under Climate-Kick Paradigms: The Role of Knowledge Creation and Dispersion Models." INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS, BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT 1, no. 1 (2024): 126–34. https://doi.org/10.56065/icebm2024.126.
Full textAbstract:
This paper investigates the complexities of Entrepreneurship Ecosystems under Climate-Kick Paradigms, focusing on the role of knowledge creation and dispersion in driving climate innovation. The purpose is to understand how dynamic knowledge flows within these ecosystems impact sustainable entrepreneurship. Scope: The research is conceptually focused due to limitations such as the absence of empirical data, case studies, or stakeholder interviews, relying primarily on theoretical models and secondary literature. A conceptual analysis draws from theories of open innovation, knowledge spillovers, and circular economy to explore knowledge dissemination mechanisms. The study highlights collaborative networks, capacity building, and policy incentives as key drivers. Findings suggest that fostering collaborative innovation networks and adopting circular economy frameworks enhance knowledge sharing. However, challenges such as fragmented ecosystems and access barriers persist, hindering efficient knowledge transfer and innovation scalability. The paper concludes that the development of knowledge hubs, enhanced capacity-building initiatives, and policy driven incentives can promote sustainable climate entrepreneurship. This research uniquely integrates climate action paradigms with entrepreneurial ecosystem theory, offering new insights into fostering climate innovation. The strategies presented can assist policymakers, entrepreneurs, and stakeholders in enhancing climate-focused entrepreneurship ecosystems, contributing to both economic development and environmental sustainability. In the development of a sustainability model tailored to entrepreneurship ecosystems under Climate-Kick paradigms, the challenge lies in balancing dynamic innovation with sustainable impact, driven by effective knowledge creation and dispersion. A deep understanding of the factors and dynamics that influence these ecosystems reveals several strategic approaches that can be applied to practice. Potential strategies for developing a sustainability model applicable to climate focused entrepreneurship ecosystems are provided in the text.
34
Moore, Sheila. "Exploring a Social Justice Learning Ecosystem Embedded in University, School, and Community Partnerships." Florida Journal of Educational Research 59, no. 1 (2022): 106–20. https://doi.org/10.62798/wajy5219.
Full textAbstract:
The purpose of this conceptual paper was to examine the literature on university, school, and community partnerships and add to the body of research as it relates to social justice and learning ecosystems. Specifically, a social justice learning ecosystem was explored and conceptualized through school–university partnerships with the purpose of building and strengthening a social justice orientation among multiple school community members to advance student outcomes. Social justice in learning ecosystems is of importance to both educational researchers and practitioners on a national and international platform. As school leaders focus on social justice issues that impede student success, the creation of learning ecosystems will help to aid schools, communities, and universities in providing a system of support and access. Furthermore, the work of this paper concludes with recommending a model for collaborative partnerships through learning ecosystems.
35
Yablonsky, Sergey. "A multidimensional platform ecosystem framework." Kybernetes 49, no. 7 (2020): 2003–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/k-07-2019-0447.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose Ecosystems that support digital businesses maximize the economic value of network connections. This forces a shift toward platforms and ecosystems that are collaborative by nature by applying business models with multiple actors playing multiple roles. The purpose of this study is to show how the main concepts emerging from research on digital platform ecosystems (DPEs) could be organized in a taxonomy-based framework with different levels or dimensions of analysis. This study discusses some of the contingencies at these different levels and argues that future research needs to study DPEs across multiple levels of analysis. While this integrative framework allows the comparison, contrast and integration of various perspectives at different levels of analysis, further theorizing will be needed to advance the DPE research. The multidimensional framework proposed here involves the use of a multimethodological approach that incorporates a synergy of businesses, technological innovations and management methods to provide support for research in interrelationships across platform ecosystems (PEs) on a regular basis. Design/methodology/approach This paper proposes a new PE framework by constructing a formal taxonomy model that explains a vast group of phenomena produced by the PEs. Findings In addition to illustrating the PE taxonomy framework, this study also proposes a clear and precise description and structuring of the information in the ecosystem domain. The PE framework assists in identification, creation, assessment and disclosure research of platform business ecosystems. Research limitations/implications Because of the large number of taxonomy concepts (over 200), only main taxonomy fragments are shown in the paper. Practical implications The outcomes of this research could be used for planning, oversight and control over ecosystem management and the use of ecosystem’s knowledge-related resources for research purposes. Originality/value The PE framework is original and represents an effective tool for observing PEs.
36
Nascimento, Sandro De Freitas, Manolita Correia Lima, and Igor Jordano Cassemiro Gondim. "Level of collaboration and knowledge transfer among actors of the innovation ecosystem: the proposition of an analytical model." International Journal of Innovation 10, no. 3 (2022): 434–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i3.21057.
Full textAbstract:
Objective of the study: This study aimed to investigate how collaboration between actors in the innovation ecosystem is related to the transfer of knowledge between institutions.Methodology/Approach: The study units were the innovation hubs of the Federal Institutes of Education, Science and Technology in Brazil accredited by Embrapii. The methodological approach of the research was qualitative; the method employed was the multiple-case study; the data collection was conducted through semistructured interviews with representatives from academia, company, government, and society; and the results were obtained via content analysis.Originality/Relevance: Based on the findings of this research, it was possible to elaborate an analytical model to relate the level of collaboration and transfer of knowledge between agents of the innovation ecosystem.Main Results: The main results indicated that the collaboration between the actors was related to the transfer of knowledge through the creation and expansion of the established partnerships as well as the management of the facilitators and difficulty of this relationship.Theoretical/ Methodological Contributions: The theoretical contribution was the proposition of an integrated analytical model of collaborative relations and knowledge transfer between members of the innovation ecosystem.Management/Social Contributions: The managerial contribution of the study was the identification of key aspects to improve the collaborative relationship between the actors of the innovation and knowledge transfer ecosystem. The social contribution consists of the possibility of collaboration expansion and knowledge transfer by enhancing the facilitating factors and minimizing the difficulties identified in the researched innovation ecosystems.
37
Taiwo Idowu, Ayodeji, Rasheed O Ajirotutu, Fasasi Lanre Erinjogunola, et al. "Biodiversity Conservation and Ecosystem Services: A Review of Challenges and Opportunities." International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies 4, no. 6 (2024): 1381–88. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2024.4.6.4015.
Full textAbstract:
Biodiversity conservation and the delivery of ecosystem services are critical components for sustaining life on Earth. This review explores the multifaceted challenges and opportunities associated with these interconnected concepts, shedding light on the intricate relationship between biodiversity and the services ecosystems provide. The conservation of biodiversity is essential for maintaining ecological balance and resilience, as diverse ecosystems offer a wide array of services crucial for human well-being. The challenges confronting biodiversity conservation are diverse and complex. Anthropogenic activities such as deforestation, habitat destruction, pollution, and climate change pose significant threats to biodiversity. Moreover, the intrinsic interconnectedness of species within ecosystems makes it challenging to predict the cascading effects of the loss of a single species on the entire ecosystem. Inadequate awareness and insufficient policies further exacerbate these challenges, necessitating a holistic and collaborative approach for effective conservation. Despite these challenges, there exist promising opportunities to address and mitigate the threats to biodiversity and ecosystem services. Sustainable land management practices, habitat restoration initiatives, and the establishment of protected areas contribute to the preservation of biodiversity. Furthermore, the integration of traditional ecological knowledge and modern conservation strategies can enhance the effectiveness of conservation efforts. International cooperation and policy frameworks play a crucial role in fostering a global commitment to biodiversity conservation. Recognizing the economic value of ecosystem services provides an additional avenue for promoting conservation. By quantifying and incorporating the value of services such as pollination, water purification, and climate regulation into decision-making processes, societies can establish incentives for sustainable practices. In conclusion, this review highlights the intricate challenges faced by biodiversity conservation and the provision of ecosystem services, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive and collaborative approach. Through a combination of conservation efforts, sustainable practices, and global cooperation, there is an opportunity to secure a future where biodiversity thrives and ecosystems continue to provide essential services for the benefit of both nature and humanity.
38
Ruiz Ruiz, Luis, Joe Alexis González Vásquez, Orivel Jackson Buchelli Perales, Elar Amado Alayo Villanueva, and Denis Chinchayhuara Diego. "Ecosistema digital para el fortalecimiento de cadenas productivas: una revisión sistemática (2005-2024)." Suma de Negocios 15, no. 33 (2024): 130–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.14349/sumneg/2024.v15.n33.a6.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction/Objectives: This Systematic Review (SR) explores digital ecosystems and their impact on strengthening productive chains. The objectives include analyzing the current state, characteristics, benefits, challenges, and opportunities associated with implementing digital ecosystems. The study focuses on the present state and implications of these ecosystems for enhancing productive chains. Methodology: Conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this review includes 87 relevant articles on digital ecosystems sourced from Elsevier’s Scopus (56), ProQuest (21), SciELO (6), and Google Scholar (4). Results: There has been a notable increase in publications on this topic, with significant interest in original research articles and substantial contributions from the United States, Germany, and Russia in technological innovation. However, there is a significant gap in empirical research validating theoretical foundations. Digital ecosystems are emerging as key enablers of digital transformation and collaborative value generation, characterized by business cooperation, collaborative integration, automation, and innovation. Despite benefits such as increased efficiency and cost reduction, challenges include political barriers, limited connectivity, infrastructure issues, resistance to change, digital skills gaps, and high initial investment costs. Conclusions: The systematic review reveals a significant gap in research on digital ecosystems, highlighting a lack of empirical studies to validate existing theoretical foundations. This presents a clear opportunity for future research in this field. In analyzing the implementation of digital ecosystems in organizations, collaborative systems are emphasized as drivers of efficiency and cost reduction. Strategically addressing these challenges is essential for the successful implementation of digital ecosystems and maximizing their impact.
39
Переславцева, Инна Игоревна. "RESEARCH OF THE PARTICIPATION RISKS IN INNOVATIVE ECOSYSTEMS." Housing and utilities infrastructure, no. 2(21) (June 15, 2022): 115–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.36622/vstu.2022.21.2.012.
Full textAbstract:
Проведено исследование рисков, возникающих при участии компаний в инновационных экосистемах. Рассмотрены категории понятия риска, проработанные отечественными учеными. Проанализированы исследования, рассматривающие дополнительные риски при создании совместной инновационной среды. Выделены основные группы рисков коллаборативного участия в инновационной экосистеме: риски взаимозависимости, риски интеграции, инициативные риски, риски оппортунистического поведения, а также риски дисбаланса власти. Предложена трехслойная модель рисков коллаборативного участия в цифровой экосистеме, возникающих при совместном сотрудничестве. Рассмотрены особенности участия в инновационных экосистемах крупных и малых компаний. Сделан вывод о необходимости использования сетевых форм организации бизнеса для увеличения присутствия компаний на рынках в условиях глобальных масштабов конкуренции. I conducted a study of the risks arising from the participation of companies in innovative ecosystems. I considered the categories of the concept of risk worked out by domestic scientists. As well I analyzed the studies considering additional risks when creating joint innovation environment. The main identified risk groups of collaborative participation in the innovation ecosystem are: risks of interdependence, risks of integration, initiative risks, risks of opportunistic behavior, as well as risks of power imbalance. I offered a three-layer model of risks of collaborative participation in the digital ecosystem arising from joint cooperation. I also considered features of participation in innovation ecosystems of large and small companies. I made the conclusion about the need to use network forms of business organization to increase the presence of companies in the markets in the context of global competition.
40
Inada, Yuko. "Unlocking Value Co-Creation in Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: The Vital Role of Institutions." Administrative Sciences 14, no. 5 (2024): 82. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/admsci14050082.
Full textAbstract:
The entrepreneurial ecosystem is quite complicated because of the presence of numerous stakeholders and the inclusion of multicultural and social elements in diverse communities. The role of entrepreneurship education in developing entrepreneurial skills and aptitude has evolved. The collaboration between universities, companies, and organizations in the collaborative online international learning (COIL) approach plays an important role in the entrepreneurial ecosystem to enhance value co-creation. To extend the limited literature on value creation through entrepreneurship education among stakeholders and analyze the entrepreneurial ecosystem from a micro perspective, this study investigated why companies and organizations support universities at the individual, organizational, and institutional levels to foster entrepreneurial ecosystems. Following a global career course using the COIL approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted in person or via Zoom with four representatives of the Embassy of Canada to Japan, Ernst & Young, and Manulife from April to May 2022. The modified grounded theory approach was used to analyze the responses from three institutions. The results showed that students were provided with the opportunity to solve actual issues that the three institutions faced and the students’ perspectives were considered to identify and develop high-quality proposals at the individual, organizational, and institutional levels. The institutional philosophy, organizational engagement and development, and personal development of the representatives of these institutions effectively create values within universities while also forming entrepreneurial ecosystems at Japanese and Canadian companies, organizations, and universities to help build the next generation of leaders. This study has important implications through its contribution to society and the development of an entrepreneurial ecosystem in collaboration with the academic, industrial, and public sectors.
41
Oumaima, Smyej, and Ben Massou S. Mohamed. "The Conditions of the Emergence of Innovation Ecosystems: A Panoramic View." International Journal of Business and Management 17, no. 12 (2022): 44. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v17n12p44.
Full textAbstract:
Based on a bibliographic study, this contribution explores the conditions of birth of innovation Ecosystems (IEs). The main purpose is to give an overview of the current thinking on the theme. The conceptual models drawn from the literature including the factors of birth of an ecosystem constitute the result of this paper work. The main ambition is the study of the possibility of setting up an IE with analysis of the existing situation. Thanks to an exploratory study, we were able to proof that an ecosystem community come into existence through both emergent and deliberate strategies. Three major phases characterize ecosystems arrival: knowledge ecosystem (KE), IE and business ecosystem (BE). During the birth phase, many factors are likely to enhance its advent, in particular: the diversity of ecosystem’s actors, the sharing of knowledge between members, the training for collaborative and inter-organizational skills and the establishment of a climate of trust within the community.
42
Ventura, Lucía, Ignacio Martín-Jimenez, and Marcelino Gallego-Garcia. "A Risk Management Framework to Enhance Environmental Sustainability in Industrial Symbiosis Ecosystems." Sustainability 17, no. 6 (2025): 2604. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062604.
Full textAbstract:
Industrial symbiosis (IS) fosters collaboration between industries to exchange materials, energy, water, and by-products. It contributes to environmental and economic sustainability by reducing resource consumption, decreasing greenhouse gas emissions, and generating economic benefits. However, managing risks in these exchanges presents challenges, particularly as materials like waste and by-products fall outside traditional supply chain practices. This paper introduces the Industrial Collaborative Risk Management (ICRM) Methodology, an extended Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) approach specifically designed for collaborative industrial ecosystems. The ICRM methodology provides a systematic approach to identifying, assessing, prioritizing risks, and implementing corrective actions, enabling the reliable implementation of IS. By effectively managing risks, this methodology minimizes disruptions in material and energy exchanges, strengthens the resilience of industrial ecosystems, and enhances their environmental ambitions. The methodology supports cross-sectoral communication, facilitates knowledge exchange, and promotes trust among stakeholders. A real IS case study demonstrates the ICRM methodology’s ability to document interrelations, standardize risk evaluation, and propose mitigation strategies. This work provides IS facilitators with a practical tool for effective risk management in complex industrial environments and lays the foundation for future applications in diverse ecosystems.
43
Ramezani, Javaneh, and Luis M. Camarinha-Matos. "A collaborative approach to resilient and antifragile business ecosystems." Procedia Computer Science 162 (2019): 604–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.029.
Full text
44
Agustí-Torra, Anna, Frederic Raspall, David Remondo, David Rincón, and Giovanni Giuliani. "On the feasibility of collaborative green data center ecosystems." Ad Hoc Networks 25 (February 2015): 565–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2014.11.004.
Full text
45
Ramezani, Javaneh, and Luis M. Camarinha-Matos. "Approaches for resilience and antifragility in collaborative business ecosystems." Technological Forecasting and Social Change 151 (February 2020): 119846. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119846.
Full text
46
Abreu, A., and J. M. F. Calado. "Risk Model to Support the Governance of Collaborative Ecosystems." IFAC-PapersOnLine 50, no. 1 (2017): 10544–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1313.
Full text
47
Mikhailov, Andrei, Kadigia Faccin, Douglas Wegner, and Elisa Thomas. "The Micro-Governance of Collaborative Networks: Promoting Entrepreneurial Ecosystems." Journal of technology management & innovation 19, no. 4 (2024): 64–76. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242024000400064.
Full text
48
o‘g‘li, Nazarov G’anisher Alisher. "UNIQUE ECOSYSTEMS UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF GLOBAL CLIMATE." American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations 6, no. 3 (2024): 40–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/volume06issue03-08.
Full textAbstract:
In this article describe Conclusively, this research underscores the necessity of integrating ecological and botanical knowledge in developing multifaceted conservation strategies. It advocates for a global collaborative approach to conservation, emphasizing the role of local communities, policymakers, and international organizations in safeguarding biodiversity amidst the challenges posed by global climate change. The findings contribute to the scientific understanding of climate change's impacts on unique ecosystems and offer a foundation for future research and policy development aimed at biodiversity conservation.
49
Legenvre, Herve, Ari-Pekka Hameri, and Pietari Kauttu. "Strategizing with Hardware Rich Open Source Ecosystems." Journal of Innovation Management 9, no. 2 (2021): 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_009.002_0003.
Full textAbstract:
Companies are increasingly adopting open source strategies to develop and exploit complex infrastructures and platforms that combine software, hardware and standard interfaces. Such strategies require the development of a vibrant ecosystem of partners that combines the innovation capabilities of hundreds of companies from different industries. Our aim is to help decision makers assess the benefits and challenges associated with creating or joining such ecosystems. We use a case study approach on six major collaborative ecosystems that enable the development of complex, high cost infrastructures and platforms. We characterize their strategy, governance, and their degree of intellectual property (IP) openness. We offer a three-dimensional framework that helps managers characterize such ecosystems. Although all the ecosystems studied aim at scaling up innovative solutions, their strategy, governance and IP openness vary. An upstream strategy aimed at replacing supplier proprietary design with open substitutes requires a democratic governance and an intellectual property policy that maximize the attractiveness of the ecosystem. A downstream strategy aimed at carving a space in new markets requires an autocratic governance and an intellectual property policy that combine attractiveness and value capture opportunities.
50
Researcher. "NETWORKING AND COLLABORATIVE ECOSYSTEMS AS CATALYSTS FOR SMALL BUSINESS GROWTH IN COMPETITIVE MARKETPLACES: A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS." International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business (IJESB) 2, no. 1 (2025): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14724557.
Full textAbstract:
In increasingly competitive marketplaces, small businesses face unique challenges that hinder growth and sustainability. This paper explores the impact of networking and collaborative ecosystems on small business growth, leveraging both quantitative and qualitative approaches. It highlights the role of partnerships, innovation clusters, and shared resources in providing small businesses with competitive advantages. Findings reveal that businesses leveraging networking opportunities and collaborative ecosystems experience higher growth, better resilience, and enhanced market penetration.