Academic literature on the topic 'Commercialization of research'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Commercialization of research.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Commercialization of research"

1

Brody, Herb. "Research commercialization." Nature 533, no. 7601 (May 2016): S5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/533s5a.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

SOMBERG, JOHN C. "THE COMMERCIALIZATION OF RESEARCH." American Journal of Therapeutics 3, no. 8 (August 1996): 551–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00045391-199608000-00001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Markman, Gideon D., Donald S. Siegel, and Mike Wright. "Research and Technology Commercialization." Journal of Management Studies 45, no. 8 (December 2008): 1401–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00803.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hutchinson, James A. "Commercialization of Transplantation Research." Transplantation 100, no. 5 (May 2016): 964–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/tp.0000000000001241.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Fitzpatrick, Joyce J. "The commercialization of research." Applied Nursing Research 16, no. 3 (August 2003): 133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0897-1897(03)00050-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Dooley, Lawrence, and Breda Kenny. "Research Collaboration and Commercialization." Industry and Higher Education 29, no. 2 (April 2015): 93–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2015.0246.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper explores PhD students' perceptions of their entrepreneurial and commercial capabilities, their attitude towards university supports and the extent to which they engage in external collaboration. The study concentrated on current PhD researchers at one university in Ireland as a unit of analysis and provides encouraging evidence from the PhD student perspective. There is a strong base to work from, considering the level of absorptive capacity in terms of industrial experience and the desire to increase business/entrepreneurial capability. This capacity sits alongside a realism on the part of the students, who openly acknowledge their skills deficit but believe that education modules can close this gap. There was a willingness to invest in entrepreneurial up-skilling to a point, with the students wishing to maintain a balance between mastery of their discipline and the development of entrepreneurial capability. However, no evidence was found that individual capability combined with university supports is a predictor of research commercialization activities or of collaborative research endeavours.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Far, Amin Motamedi, Mehdi Razavi Pour, Marjan Noor Fekri, Leila Jafari, and Fereshte Ebrahimkhah. "Commercialization of Research Results." Oman Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review 2, no. 6 (January 2013): 72–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.12816/0002294.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Tan, Sunny. "Commercialization of Publicly Funded Research." Asia-Pacific Biotech News 09, no. 24 (December 30, 2005): 1316–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0219030305002119.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Makino, Hiroshi, Akitaka Kato, and Yasunori Yamazaki. "Research and Commercialization of SCARA Robot –The Case of Industry-University Joint Research and Development–." International Journal of Automation Technology 1, no. 1 (September 5, 2007): 61–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2007.p0061.

Full text
Abstract:
This round-table talk was planned as part of the feature “Commercialization of Robot Research.” Taking the SCARA robot as a successful example of commercialization, we'd like to hear from its developers, Drs. Makino, Kato, and Yamazaki, about what was involved and their ideas on future commercialization of robot research.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Alpeeva, E. A., and E. V. Timohina. "Structural and functional model of commercialization innovative activity results in universities." Economy in the industry 11, no. 2 (September 1, 2018): 177–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2018-2-177-184.

Full text
Abstract:
Innovative activity of universities is a fundamental direction of innovative development of the Russian economy. Universities play the role of innovation centers in regions and industries. The interests of the state, business and the higher school are integrated in the course of creation, development and commercialization of new knowledge. Process of commercialization is continuous as innovative search. It begins along with the beginning of developments. Process of commercialization will begin when the higher education institution has a problem of generation of profit from scientific activity. At the same time various commercializations of forms can be used: as with full alienation of laws of estate of intellectual property, as with maintaining the rights of use of development behind the university. Perspective model of commercialization of university research and development at which the Higher Education Institution remains the owner of the values created in his walls, this creation of the small innovative enterprises. In work results of a research of application of this form are given in the Russian universities. Creation of the small innovative enterprises has a number of positive aspects, both for the university, and for economy of the region and the country in general. Article contains research results of development a transfer infrastructure of higher education institutions technologies to real production. It revealed formation of high innovative capacity of regions. Infrastructure of commercialization of high school research and development is defined as a complex of the interconnected serving departments of higher education institution. They accompany realization of research activity of workers of the university and provide a possibility of commercialization of results of innovative activity. The structurally functional model in which separate elements of innovative infrastructure of the university correspond to a certain form of commercialization and stages of commercialization of innovative activity of higher education institutions is presented in article.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Commercialization of research"

1

Houweling, Stefan [Verfasser]. "Commercialization of academic research / Stefan Houweling." Siegen : Universitätsbibliothek der Universität Siegen, 2017. http://d-nb.info/1142002071/34.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Fu, Xiao. "Commercialization of university research : the case of Nanjing, China." Thesis, University of British Columbia, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/44544.

Full text
Abstract:
The Chinese government is propelling commercialization of university research as a strategy to boost industrial innovation and upgrade economic structure. Nanjing, the national third largest hub of science and technology (S&T) resources, was selected in 2009 as the only pilot city for comprehensive S&T institutional reform. Based on in-depth key informant interviews, site visits and documents collected from multi-sources, this study examines the framework conditions as well as specific mechanisms of university research commercialization in Nanjing. This research also strives to broaden and deepen the existent literature on university-industry liaison in China, which is detected as empirically narrow, theoretically thin and analytically shallow. Following an introduction (chapter 1) and a literature review (chapter 2), a China-specific model to analyze regional/local innovation is designed based on a critical review of the development trajectory of innovation theories (chapter 3). Employing this theoretical tool, the multi-layer policies, institutions and programs set up by multi-scalar governments to govern innovation and technology commercialization in Nanjing are depicted and interrogated (chapter 4). At a conceptual level, this multi-layer framework apparatus displays a pattern of “hierarchical amplification”, which the author argues has led to propensities of overcapacity, irrationality and “mission creep” in China’s efforts at boosting innovation. Empirically, four sets of university-affiliated research commercialization channels operating under the multi-layer framework in Nanjing are studied – 1) university technology transfer offices, 2) enterprise-college-institute cooperation platforms, 3) university science parks, and 4) university spin-off companies (chapter 5). This thesis concludes by summarizing the research and identifying impediments in the current university research commercialization regime (chapter 6).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Vice, President Research Office of the. "Bridging the Commercialization Gap." Office of the Vice President Research, The University of British Columbia, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/2668.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Wehby, Richard George 1957. "Patents and licensing and the commercialization of academic biomedical research." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/28593.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (S.M.)--Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology; and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2004.
Vita.
Includes bibliographical references (leaf 72).
This thesis is part of a larger body of research being undertaken by Dr. Fiona Murray and colleagues examining value creation and sharing between and among the three principal players in the commercialization of academic biomedical research: universities, biotech firms, and big pharma. The Recombinant Capital database provided access to contracts for biomedical technology licensed from academe to biotech, and also subsequent contracts that included that same technology from biotech to big pharma. These two contracts comprise a contract "pair". Importantly, these contract "pairs" were unredacted, that is., all parts of the contracts, including the commercial terms, were available. This thesis will lay the foundation for later work by examining the contracts between university and biotech, from the University's point of view. The goal is to identify factors that give the university more power in a pricing negotiation, and that predict higher economic value for the contract. The Specific Aim is to determine if certain University factors have a significant effect on predicting the economic value of the university-biotech licensing agreement. Four groups of readily quantifiable factors that contain attributes that might add power to the University in its pricing negotiation with the Biotech firm were identified: Institutional factors, Single Inventor factors, Aggregate factors, and Invention factors. The hypothesis is that at least one of these factors will have a significant effect on predicting the value of the licensing agreement, as determined using ordinary- and multiple-linear regression models. In formulistic terms, the null- and test-hypotheses are: (HO) no factor has a significant effect on predicting economic value, and (HI) at least one
(cont.) one factor has a significant effect on predicting economic value. A multiple regression model of the factors as explanatory variables for the economic value of the license revealed that two independent university factors significantly predict economic value of the contract. These combined factors account for 64% of the variance of the dependent variable (in excess of control), and have coefficients that are significant (p < 0.001). The results are discussed in the context of its importance to university technology transfer officers, biotech firms and venture capitalists.
by Richard George Wehby.
S.M.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Zhou, Yu. "Investigation of Research Commercialization at a University: A Case Study." Diss., Virginia Tech, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/52037.

Full text
Abstract:
With the increase of awareness and focus on university research commercialization, much research had been conducted to investigate this subject. It was revealed that because universities were not traditionally built to serve the purpose of commercialization, many obstacles existed in the path of university research commercialization. Historically, research had largely focused on identifying critical factors that impacted the performance of commercialization. However, it was not clear how those findings could be systematically incorporated into the commercialization improvement plan of individual cases. This research intended to fill this gap and provide a framework that could be used by most universities to access and improve their research commercialization process. A case study of a U.S. land-grant university was conducted and a narrative approach was mainly used as the method of data analysis. Under the scope of a single-case study, four sub-studies were conducted to address the goals of this research. First, a framework was developed that incorporated theories of existing research and the value stream map of lean management. Interviews with the intellectual property office and faculty were conducted to determine if the theoretical framework was applicable. It was found that the framework fitted well with the current process of university research commercialization. After that, a survey that covered a sample size of 1110 researchers at the targeted university was conducted to investigate the importance of different resources at different stages of the process. Resources that were under investigation were grouped into four categories: technical, human, social, and financial resources. This research identified the most important resources for research commercialization were industrial connections (social resource) and assistance from the intellectual property (IP) office (human resource), with industrial connections playing a more importance role at the beginning of the process and the IP office from the stage of patent application. To assess organizational characteristics of the targeted university, interviews were conducted with 22 faculty, three representatives from the administration, one representative from the intellectual property office, and one representative from an external organization. Six criteria derived from previous research were used to guide the assessment: (1) expenditures on research and development (RandD), (2) intellectual property policy, (3) research field, (4) key individuals, (5) commitment to innovation, and (6) networking with external relations. It was found that the targeted university had strong evidence of the advantages of expenditures on RandD and research field, however, it was relatively weak in the other four characteristics. The last part of the research involved interviews with two companies for the purpose of developing a best practice for research commercialization with the examples from the industry. Recommendations to improve targeted university's research commercialization were developed based on findings of the research.
Ph. D.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Abu-Talib, Noraini. "Commercialization and its discontents." Thesis, University of Stirling, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1893/390.

Full text
Abstract:
Since the late 1990s the government of Malaysia has increased emphasis on its Intensification of Research in Priority Areas (IRPA) program, focusing scientific research in universities and government research institutes (GRIs) on activities most likely to enhance national economic performance. The IRPA’s main purpose is to fund commercially viable research for the benefit of business. However, its 2001 mid-term review showed its rates and volumes of commercialization and technology transfer (CTT) to be inadequate. This study aimed to explain the perceived low rate of adoption and commercialization of scientific knowledge in manufacturing in Malaysia by exploring the actions of companies, universities and GRIs. Two main models of technical change, the Technik and the STH ones, were used. Fieldwork was carried out in Malaysia. Purposive sampling led to selection of 60 interviewees: 23 managers and professionals from companies, 17 scientists, eight Technology Transfer Office officers, six senior research administrators, three venture capitalists, two journalists and a politician. The interviews were open-ended. It was seen that research findings were not always relevant to company interests, and companies often preferred their own or adopted, sometimes reverse-engineered, technology. Government CTT funds did not help much in with design, prototypes and pilot plants. Inadequate communication and lack of trust influenced the low uptake of research findings. The commercial relevance of much scientific research was questioned. More government support for company risk-taking appeared to be needed. Differences in attitude and poor understanding of policies and principles tended to contribute to low uptake. Managers, professional, scientists, Technology Transfer Officers, senior research administrators, venture capitalists needed more flexibility, knowledge and skills to respond to profit-driven research findings. A specifically Malaysian approach to CTT was advocated.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Metla, Chandra Mohan Reddy. "Research faculty, entrepreneurship and commercialization : the case of Kansas State University." Thesis, Manhattan, Kan. : Kansas State University, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/505.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Lacetera, Nicola. "The organization of research activities in industry and academia : implications for the commercialization of university research." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/37113.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2006.
"June 2006."
Includes bibliographical references.
This dissertation is composed of three essays. In the first essay, I build a model of the choice and timing of entry into commercial activities by an academic research team, and analyze the returns and costs of these activities. I compare the behavior and performance of the academic team to an industrial research team. The two teams are assumed to differ in their objectives, governance modes, and incentive systems. I show that, while in some cases academic scientists are more reluctant to commercialize research, in other cases they may commercialize faster than profit-seeking firms would - and perform less basic research. Academic and non-academic scientists also select different projects, and this may explain the good performance of 'academic entrepreneurs' found in several empirical studies. In the light of these results, I interpret the mixed evidence on the success of, and the arguments in favor and against, the involvement of universities into business-related research activities. In the second essay, I define a model of a firm's choice of whether to conduct research in-house or to outsource it to academic research teams.
(cont.) I exploit the fact that companies and universities have different missions, and model the different authority structures implied by different organizational choices in the conduct of research. Outsourcing a project to a university allows a firm to commit not to terminate or alter a scientifically valuable project before completion. This commitment is potentially valuable for the firm in an environment where scientific value and economic value may not coincide, and scientific workers are responsive to the incentives defined by their community of peers. I then formulate some empirical predictions about the kind of research activities firms will outsource to universities, and activities on which they will exert stronger control. I confront these hypotheses with empirical evidence from a sample of industry-university research agreements, as well as from other analyses and case studies, and find patterns consistent with my model. In the third essay, I analyze the restrictions on publication and control over the research agenda for universities and other 'open-science' research organizations, in a sample of biotechnology research contracts where the sponsor party is a for-profit company.
(cont.) I find that stronger publication restrictions appear to be more frequent in projects concerning earlier phase research and projects with longer duration. Research teams based in hospitals have significantly lower publication delays. Longer project duration is also strongly correlated with higher authority of the sponsoring firm over the direction of research. Teams in more prestigious research organizations tend to be subjected to lesser control by the sponsor company.
by Nicola Lacetera.
Ph.D.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Mir, Rizwan, and Hassan Muhammad Ahsan. "Managing Commercialization of Academic research : A Case Study of Umea University, Sweden." Thesis, Umeå universitet, Handelshögskolan vid Umeå universitet, 2010. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-47769.

Full text
Abstract:
Background and Research Problem: Universities are complex and diversified institutions playing an active role in society. Besides education and research universities are now assigned a new role of commercialization of academic research. There is pressure on universities to act as a bridge for transfer of knowledge to industries and generate resources. As this role of commercialization is comparatively new for the universities so they face challenges and difficulties in managing commercialization along with education and research. In order to overcome these challenges some support structures has been introduced in the form of Technology Transfer Office (TTO) or Industry Liaison Office (ILO). As the role and support structures are new, so there is a need to develop such a managerial system which can better integrate the activities related to commercialization of academic research.   Research Purpose: This is a case study of Umeå University conducted to understand and evaluate the commercialization activities and functioning of support structures. The specific purpose is to investigate and suggest that, how universities having support structures but lacking success stories and track records, should manage its commercialization activities.   Method: Qualitative research methods are used and semi-structured interviews have been conducted from eight respondents. Umeå University has been used as a case study. Concluding Comments: On the basis of this study we would like to comment that, Umeå University is committed to perform its third role of contribution towards society and there is adequate infrastructure available in terms of support structures. But still as this role is new for the university and carrying on commercialization activities while insuring freedom of research is a challenging task. So, a detailed evaluation of existing support structures and reorganization of their existing activities is required. It may also require better understanding and communication of the concept of commercialization, generation of new ideas and a greater attention, both from the support structures and central management of the university.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Lindström, Tom, and Stefan Silver. "Avoiding the innovation valley of death : Private sector commercialization of publicly funded research." Thesis, KTH, Skolan för industriell teknik och management (ITM), 2017. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-217795.

Full text
Abstract:
The Swedish Government annually distributes billions of SEK on different agencies, councils, and institutions with instructions to finance research initiatives that promote public benefit and Swedish competitiveness internationally. The expectations are that these initiatives are picked up by the private sector as soon as the research starts showing results and in this way reach all branches of society. Many companies actively utilize this to catch new innovations early but also to make use of research, so they do not have to finance these early phases themselves. With diverging incentives and many stakeholders from academia, public financiers, and the industry, it is often a long and bumpy road towards commercialization. The purpose of this study was primarily to identify obstacles and barriers that could arise along the road to commercialization. Secondly, it aims to map the aspects that need to be addressed and find out how to work around the barriers to increase the commercialization success rate. The study is performed with its basis in a large Swedish company within food science and agriculture that are currently active within the studied area. The study is built on three major methods; interviews, a survey, and a workshop. The interviews and the workshop was conducted with several representatives from the different groups of stakeholders such as project managers and industry supervisors, but also with less biased third parties such as external financiers and business coaches. The survey was deployed to researchers that has received public funding to conduct research within food science or agriculture. The interviews and the survey were aimed at mapping the different barriers but also at suggesting possible improvements meanwhile the workshop was aimed at providing insight to the interaction between the different stakeholders in a project. The results point to a variety of problems and barriers that need to be addressed to improve the outlook for co-funded R&D-projects. Amongst these, we found, for example lack of financial resources, collaboration between stakeholders, divergent goals, and business modeling. The results and the analysis also point to a number of measures to take within many of the areas that would help the projects. The primary conclusions of the study make up a model that takes project progress into account at the same time as it suggests proactive measures such as financing, goals, and collaboration as well as reactive measures such as business area integration and development companies to reduce the influence of the discovered barriers.
Den svenska staten delar idag ut flera miljarder kronor till olika forskningsråd och myndigheter som ska finansiera forskning som bringar nytta till samhället och stärker svensk innovation och konkurrenskraft internationellt. Förhoppningen är att den privata sektorn ska ta vid när forskningen börjar nå resultat och på den vägen ta sig ut i samhällets alla grenar. Många företag drar idag aktivt nytta av detta för att fånga innovationer tidigt men också för att ta del av forskning utan att behöva stå för finansiering av de tidiga faserna. Med spridda incitament och många iblandade från akademin, industrin och staten kan det bli en lång och krokig väg till kommersialisering. Den här studien syftar i första steget till att identifiera alla hinder och barriärer som kan uppstå längs vägen mot kommersialisering i statligt och privat samfinansierad forskning och utveckling. Det andra steget syftar till att kartlägga vilka aspekter som måste adresseras och hur man kan arbeta runt barriärerna för att öka chanserna för lyckad kommersialisering. Studien är gjord utifrån ett stort svenskt företag inom livsmedel och lantbruk som är aktiva inom området i fråga. Studien bygger på tre huvudsakliga metoder; intervjuer, en enkät och en workshop. Intervjuerna och workshopen genomfördes med ett flertal projektledare och handläggare men även med mer oberoende parter såsom externa finansiärer och företagscoacher. Enkäten gick ut till forskare som fått statliga medel för att bedriva forskning inom livsmedel och lantbruk. Intervjuerna och enkäten syftade till att både kartlägga barriärer och att föreslå förbättringsåtgärder för att ta sig över barriärerna, medan workshopen endast syftade till att föreslå förbättringar. Resultaten pekar mot en mängd problem och barriärer som måste adresseras för att förbättra utsikterna för samfinansierade R&D-projekt. Bland dessa finner vi exempelvis brist på finansiellt kapital, samarbetssvårigheter mellan intressenter, divergerande mål och brist på affärsmodellering. Resultaten och analysen pekar även på ett flertal åtgärder inom många av områdena som skulle kunna hjälpa projekten framåt. Studiens slutsats utgörs till större delen av en modell som tar hänsyn till projektets framåtskridande samt proaktiva åtgärder såsom finansiering, målsättning och samarbete samt reaktiva åtgärder såsom integration mot affärsområden och utvecklingsbolag för att minska barriärernas inflytande över projekten.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Commercialization of research"

1

Caulfield, Timothy A., and Bryn Williams-Jones, eds. The Commercialization of Genetic Research. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4713-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Utilization of Technologies Developed at Russian Research and Educational Institutions. and Rossiĭskaíà akademiíà nauk, eds. Technology commercialization: Russian challenges, American lessons. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

United States. Army SBIR Program Management Office, ed. US Army: Small business innovation research : commercialization. Alexandria, VA (5001 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria 22333-0001): Army SBIR Program Management Office, U.S. Army Research Office-Washington, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ontario Secondary School Teachers' Federation., ed. Commercialization in Ontario schools: A research report. [Toronto]: Ontario Secondary School Teachers' Federation, 1995.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

J, Mabry T., and Plant Biotechnology; Research Bottlenecks for Commercialization and Beyond (1987 : University of Texas at Austin), eds. Plant biotechnology: Research bottlenecks for commercialization and beyond. Austin, Tex: IC2ș Institute, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration., ed. International space research perspectives of commercialization for German industry. Washington, D.C: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, ed. International space research perspectives of commercialization for German industry. Washington, D.C: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Program, Canada Industry Canada Research Publications. University research and the commercialization of intellectual property in Canada. Ottawa: Industry Canada, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Gu, Wulong. University research and the commercialization of intellectual property in Canada. [Ottawa]: Industry Canada, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Karwowski, Waldemar, and Anna Szopa. Competitive strategies for academic entrepreneurship: Commercialization of research-based products. Hershey: Business Science Reference, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Commercialization of research"

1

Thore, Sten A. "Rating Academic Research." In Technology Commercialization, 135–46. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1001-7_9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Valderrama, T. Garcia, and T. L. C. M. Groot. "Controlling the Efficiency of University Research in the Netherlands." In Technology Commercialization, 147–82. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1001-7_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Alara, Oluwaseun Ruth, Nour Hamid Abdurahman, John Adewole Alara, Moses Oludayo Tade, and Hassan Alsaggaf Ali. "Commercialization of Biosurfactants." In Advancements in Biosurfactants Research, 525–49. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21682-4_24.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Merritt, Humberto, and Maria Pilar M. Perez-Hernandez. "Women’s Role in Biotechnology Research: The Case of Mexico." In Technology, Commercialization and Gender, 47–76. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49923-9_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Elias, Jeffrey Wayne. "Small business grants: Commercialization of research." In Get funded: A practical guide to understanding the grant application process and writing winning proposals in the behavioral and biomedical fields., 161–78. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0000390-011.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Maxwell, Andrew. "Enhancing the Commercialization of University Research." In Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, 57–78. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40324-8_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Malinowsk, Michael J., and Nick Littlefield. "Transformation of a Research Platform into Commercial Products." In The Commercialization of Genetic Research, 29–53. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4713-6_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Glass, Kathleen Cranley, and Trudo Lemmens. "Conflict of Interest and Commercialization of Biomedical Research." In The Commercialization of Genetic Research, 79–99. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4713-6_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Knoppers, Bartha Maria. "Biotechnology." In The Commercialization of Genetic Research, 1–11. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4713-6_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Shickle, Darren. "Cloning, God, Hitler and Mad Scientists." In The Commercialization of Genetic Research, 157–69. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4713-6_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Commercialization of research"

1

Heyward, Ann O. "Lewis Research Center: Commercialization success stories." In Space technology and applications international forum: 1st conference on commercial development of space; 1st conference on next generation launch systems; 2nd spacecraft thermal control symposium; 13th symposium on space nuclear power and propulsion. AIP, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.50025.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Gwyn, Charles W., and Peter J. Silverman. "EUVL: transition from research to commercialization." In Photomask and Next Generation Lithography Mask Technology X, edited by Hiroyoshi Tanabe. SPIE, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.504239.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Yongmin Kim. "Bioengineering, translational research, and technology commercialization." In AFRICON 2007. IEEE, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/afrcon.2007.4401480.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hsieh, Chih-Hung. "Research project valuation and commercialization strategy." In 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/picmet.2015.7273195.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Veliadis, V. "SiC Power Device Mass Commercialization." In ESSDERC 2022 - IEEE 52nd European Solid-State Device Research Conference (ESSDERC). IEEE, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/essderc55479.2022.9947113.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Riddlebaugh, Steve. "Commercialization processes at NASA Lewis Research Ctr." In SPIE's 1994 International Symposium on Optics, Imaging, and Instrumentation, edited by Nona K. Minnifield. SPIE, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.188830.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Costin, A. M., J. Felkl, O. Golovina, and J. Teizer. "Roadmap to Guide Construction Safety Research Commercialization." In 31st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC), 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.22260/isarc2014/0086.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

JAGUSIAK-KOCIK, M. "Commercialization of Research Results – Overview of Assumptions and General Definitions." In Quality Production Improvement and System Safety. Materials Research Forum LLC, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.21741/9781644902691-32.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract. The work is based on a literature review in the field of commercialization of scientific research – it presents various definitions of commercialization, the concept of indirect and direct commercialization, as well as ways of financing the commercialization of research results. The aim of the work is to present and learn about various approaches to the concept of commercialization, to show what forms the process of commercialization of research results takes place and how it can be financed. The aim is to identify and analyze the research area, because the work is an introduction to practical research and the creation of a model for the commercialization of scientific research results in the largest research network in Poland, dealing with i.e. providing attractive and competitive technological solutions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Stanoevska-Slabeva, Katarina, and Rolf Fricke. "Commercialization of composite software resulting from collaborative research." In eChallenges e-2015 Conference. IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/echallenges.2015.7441091.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Crabb, Thomas M. "Research and Development, a First Consideration in Commercialization." In International Conference On Environmental Systems. 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA, United States: SAE International, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-2268.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Commercialization of research"

1

Linkous, Clovis, Michael Hripko, Martin Abraham, Ganesaratnam Balendiran, Allen Hunter, Sherri Lovelace-Cameron, Howard Mette, Douglas Price, Gary Walker, and Ruigang Wang. Advanced Automotive Fuels Research, Development, and Commercialization Cluster (OH). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), August 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1131929.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ivey, D. L., and S. A. Smith. The role of market research in the commercialization of technology. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), March 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/5222957.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Carl Irwin, Rakesh Gupta, Richard Turton, GangaRao Hota, Cyril Logar, Tom Ponzurick, Buddy Graham, Walter Alcorn, and Jeff Tucker. Research, Commercialization, & Workforce Development in the Polymer/Electronics Recycling Industry. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), February 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/887115.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ahmed, Akhter, M. Mehrab Bakhtiar, Julie Ghostlaw, Aklima Parvin, A. S. M. Mahbubur Rahman Khan, Nasreen Sultana, Rezaul Karim Siddique, and Subrata Kumar Kundu. Commercialization of agricultural research and biotechnology stakeholder consultation workshops: Final report. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134315.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Mel Croucher, Rakesh Gupta, Hota GangaRao, Darran Cairns, Jinzing Wang, Xiaodong Shi, Jason Linnell, Karen Facemyer, Doug Ritchie, and Jeff Tucker. Continuation of Research, Commercialization, and Workforce Development in the Polymer/Electronics Recycling Industry. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/986587.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Engel-Cox, Jill, Wyatt Merrill, Marie Mapes, Ben McKenney, Antonio Bouza, Edgar DeMeo, Mary Hubbard, Eric Miller, Richard Tusing, and Brian Walker. Clean Energy Technology Pathways from Research to Commercialization: Policy and Practice Case Studies. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), February 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1958613.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Kim, Jisun. Study of the Performance and Characteristics of U.S. Academic Research Institution Technology Commercialization (ARITC). Portland State University Library, January 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.494.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Possidónio, Catarina, Ana Rita Farias, Samuel Domingos, Bernardo Cruz, Sílvia Luís, and Ana Loureiro. Exploring supply-side barriers for commercialization of new biopolymer production technologies: A systematic review. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, May 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2023.5.0076.

Full text
Abstract:
Review question / Objective: What are the multi-level supply-side barriers to the commercialization of new biopolymer production technologies? Condition being studied: Biopolymers are sustainable and environmentally friendly alternatives to traditional petroleum-based polymers, and their use is becoming increasingly important for reducing the negative impact of plastic waste on the environment. Despite the potential benefits of biopolymers, their commercialization might face several supply-side barriers. This systematic review aims the identification and characterization of these barriers. The focus is on understanding the challenges involved in the commercialization of new biopolymer production technologies, which may include technological, economic, regulatory, and social factors that can affect the adoption and use of biopolymers in various industries. The question studied in this systematic review is relevant to a broad range of stakeholders, including researchers, policymakers, and industry professionals involved in the development, production, and commercialization of new biopolymer technologies. By providing a comprehensive synthesis of the existing literature on the multi-level supply-side barriers that can hinder the commercialization of new biopolymer production technologies, this systematic review aims to inform future research, policy, and practice to facilitate the successful implementation of these technologies.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Gormley, G. J. Industrial Market Research Report: Feasibility of commercialization of the advanced antifouling coating of Copperlok, Inc. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), October 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/6730616.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Gormley, G. J. Industrial Market Research Report: Feasibility of commercialization of the advanced antifouling coating of Copperlok, Inc. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), October 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/10131299.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography