Relevant bibliographies by topics / Common Agricultural Policy

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers
  6. Reports

Academic literature on the topic 'Common Agricultural Policy'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 30 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Common Agricultural Policy.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Common Agricultural Policy"

1

Střeleček, F., and J. Lososová. "Impact of Common Agricultural Policy on Czech agriculture." Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika) 49, No. 11 (March 2, 2012): 497–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/5439-agricecon.

Full text
Abstract:
This contribution describes eight variants of the distribution of the direct payments and their impact on the farm economies in the years 2004–2006. For this purpose, selective set of 152 farms was divided in accordance with production regions: maize-growing, beet-growing, potato-growing, potato and oats-growing and uplands1. Possible demands for standard direct payments depending on the farm situation in 2002 and demands for payments set by different variants of the simplified system of direct payment distribution were figured to each of observed farms. To be comparable, individual bonuses were converted per 1 hectare of the farmland and to be considered more objectively, the eventual subsidies in terms of HRDP were calculated to the farms. In conclusion, all mentioned variants were compared from the point of view of their impact on the farm economies in different production and climatic regions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Larisa-Loredana, Dragolea. "Common Agricultural Policy." Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica 3, no. 8 (July 31, 2006): 179–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.29302/oeconomica.2006.8.3.33.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ahner, D. "Agriculture and agricultural policy in the European Union." Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika) 49, No. 2 (February 29, 2012): 62–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/5266-agricecon.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper deals with the particular stages of development of the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) in the last forty years. The process and impacts of CAP reforms are analyzed for the particular production industries of agriculture. The paper also presents a detailed description of Agenda 2000 and mid-term review of the Common Agricultural Policy in 2002 that brought about many proposals for the future working of CAP after accession of Central and Eastern European countries.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Petr, Blizkovsky, Grega Libor, and Verter Nahanga. "Towards a common agricultural policy in Africa?" Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika) 64, No. 7 (July 17, 2018): 301–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/310/2016-agricecon.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper analyses the structure and level of international cooperation among African states in the area of agriculture and rural development. It focuses on the AU and its eight Regional Economic Communities. The international cooperation schemes between the World Bank, EU, FAO and African countries in agricultural policy are reviewed. The paper concludes that, despite numerous cross-border initiatives, governance of agricultural policies in the pan-African context remains fragmented. Policy-making and cooperation schemes need to be stepped up to address continent-wide challenges in the sector. There is an urgent need for the AU and the EU to intensify their cooperation in agricultural policies and development. The AU in collaboration with its regional bodies should establish a common agricultural policy for the continent. Such initiatives need to be Africa-driven and adapted to African needs. The EU should only provide technical know-how and institutional support if welcomed by African partners. Collective action towards rural areas via greater coordination of African agricultural policies and actions would help to develop the missing institutional framework needed for agricultural development in the continent. Fostering economic growth through agricultural development and reforms may also lead to a reduction of migration as witnessed by the EU in the sixties.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Bórawski, Piotr, Aneta Belłdycka-Borawska, and James W. Dunn. "Price volatility of Polish agricultural commodities in the view of the Common Agricultural Policy." Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika) 64, No. 5 (May 14, 2018): 216–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/138/2016-agricecon.

Full text
Abstract:
In the paper, the price volatility was examined. The authors used 650 weekly observations from 2003 to 2015. Such a long period of analysis helped to reveal periods with high volatility. The objective of the paper was to recognize price volatility of agricultural commodities in Poland. The authors chose beef, pork and wheat markets to show the differentiation of price volatility. It revealed periods of large and small volatility. The global market situation impacted Polish agricultural markets with the opening markets and a greater access to the new markets. The periods having the strongest impact on Polish agricultural markets were the integration with the EU, the global crisis in 2008, and problems in the EU zone. The prices of analysed agricultural commodities differed in various EU countries. The prices of wheat increased most in France, Hungary and Lithuania. The prices of store cattle increased most in the years 2004–2015 in Estonia, Sweden and Luxemburg. The prices of pigs increased most in Malta, Sweden and Cyprus.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Bečvářová, V. "EU enlargement and the Common Agricultural Policy." Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika) 49, No. 10 (March 2, 2012): 447–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/5431-agricecon.

Full text
Abstract:
The incorporation of the Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs) to the common agrarian market of the European Union is an entrance the saturated market solving problems with surpluses of main agricultural commodities. That is why an increasing of competition among both current member states and the new members has been anticipated. The question related to productivity of factors as well as technology level influence on competitiveness on the occasion of lower prices of agricultural commodities that could bring about shift of trade between agricultural enterprises and food processors in the first stage of processing within commodity chain into some of new member countries (or changes within them) and steer flows of some of agricultural commodities utilised as raw materials. The decisive position of the second stage of agricultural products processing, characterised by highly finalised products, probably will push forward the existing member states, especially the main producers and major exporters of finalised food products in Europe. Their interest in generation and expansion of this kind of market with highly finalised food products on the CEECs food markets would be expected. Moreover, the “demand driven agriculture” implying qualitative criteria such as food safety and precaution, favourable method of production, environmental impact etc., presented by agricultural policies in last decade and for future, is largely influenced by final stages of agri-food commodity chains. Distributors and well-established processors are those who “translate” the consumer’s demand to agricultural producers. Those decide significantly about the dimension, structure and market share of agricultural production in concrete area in essence. This situation has influenced effectiveness of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) exactly. Based upon the last reforms of the CAP in the EU evaluation, the significant changes of commodity markets regulation tools and a new approach partly related to income stabilisation policy partly to support of technological change and restructuring in wider social and regional aspects of the CAP are demonstrated there.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Vosejpková, V. "Common Agricultural Policy reform - the final compromise." Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika) 50, No. 5 (February 24, 2012): 223–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/5193-agricecon.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Üniversitesi AVRUPA TOPLULUĞU ENSTİTÜSÜ, Marmara. "COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY (CAP)." Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi 2, no. 1&2 (2015): 217–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/mjes.365.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Grant, Wyn. "The common agricultural policy." Journal of Rural Studies 14, no. 3 (July 1998): 390–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0743-0167(97)00059-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Fennell, Rosemary. "The common agricultural policy." Journal of Rural Studies 14, no. 2 (April 1998): 265–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0743-0167(97)00066-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Common Agricultural Policy"

1

Huang, Zhi Feng. "Study of European Union Common Agricultural Policy : France agricultural policy anaysis." Thesis, University of Macau, 2008. http://umaclib3.umac.mo/record=b2555543.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Garcia, Raoul-Jourde Ana-Martina. "The European Commission in agricultural policy choice." Thesis, Imperial College London, 1998. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.286347.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Duncombe, David Eliot. "Policy-making under constraint : a Lindblomian approach to the Common Agricultural Policy." Thesis, University of Oxford, 1988. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.332921.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Philippidis, George. "Computable general equilibrium modelling of the Common Agricultural Policy." Thesis, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, 1999. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.300387.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Firici, Maria Carmen. "Distributional impacts of common agricultural policy adoption by Romania." Thesis, University of Aberdeen, 2003. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.401443.

Full text
Abstract:
The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union (EU) leads to higher prices for agricultural products than under free market conditions.  Therefore, the agricultural sector of a large country such as Romania plays a major role in EU accession negotiations.  In particular, the implementation of the CAP has different impacts on different socio-economic groups.  This study estimates, for the first time for Romania, the distributional impacts of the implementation of the CAP on different groups of agricultural producers and food consumers. Part of the research focuses on the assessment and analysis of the economic welfare (real income) effects of policy-induced price changes on seven groups of agricultural producers, using the traditional Marshallian approach of changes in producer surplus, and assuming an immediate accession of Romania to the EU.  The application of CAP price support implies an estimated annual producer welfare gain of about Euro 800 million, or 2.4 per cent of Romanian GDP in 1999.  Disaggregating the results by farm type, the large commercial state farming companies receive most of this benefit.  Addition of direct payments to farmers at 25 per cent of the EU-15 rate increases the aggregate producer welfare gain to about 4 per cent of Romanian GDP, and substantially increases benefits to small independent household farms. Consumer welfare effects are analysed using a 10-fold breakdown of Romanian households and the Slutsky Compensating Variation approach.  Estimates suggest that, if the current CAP results in an average increase of 10 per cent in all Romanian food prices, the lowest-income groups (i.e. urban and rural unemployed households, and urban pensioner households) will be the most affected, with their cost of living rising by up to 6.7 per cent. The estimation of gains or losses for each type of farm, and of income adjustments for each type of Romanian household, as a result of CAP adoption may assist Romanian policy makers in their debate over the agricultural and social strategies during the pre-accession period.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Dominkovic, Katarina Laura Crumley Carole L. "Traditional agriculture and rural living in Croatia compatible with the new common agricultural policy? /." Chapel Hill, N.C. : University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2007. http://dc.lib.unc.edu/u?/etd,822.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2007.
Title from electronic title page (viewed Dec. 18, 2007). "... in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology." Discipline: Anthropology; Department/School: Anthropology.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Rydén, Linda. "The EU common agricultural policy and its effects on trade." Thesis, Högskolan i Jönköping, Internationella Handelshögskolan, 2013. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-21403.

Full text
Abstract:
The common agricultural policy (CAP) is a much discussed policy in the European Union (EU). It allocates great sums to the European agricultural sector every year and has been accused of being trade distorting and outdated. This thesis takes a closer look at what protectionist measures the CAP has used. The policy’s effects on trade will be assessed employing the sugar industry as a reference case. Sugar is heavily protected and is one of the most distorted sectors in agriculture. The CAP effects on trade in the sugar industry for ten countries in and outside the EU from 1991 to 2011 are estimated using a gravity model. This particular type of estimation has, to the author’s knowledge, not been performed for the sugar industry before, which makes the study unique. The results of the empirical testing indicates that trade diversion occurs if one country is a member of the CAP and its trading partner is not. When both trading partners are outside the CAP cooperation, they are estimated to have a higher trade volume. This result indicates that the CAP decreases trade. Current economic theory, in particular the North-South model of trade developed by Krugman (1979), suggests that protectionism of non-competitive sectors should be abolished and funds should instead be directed to innovation and new technology. The CAP is in this sense not adapted to modern economic thought.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hondraki-Birbili, Constantina. "Life cycle analysis applied to policy integration : case study of agricultural policy in Greece." Thesis, Imperial College London, 1996. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.243816.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Nigro, Justin Anthony. "The Politics of Change: Reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union." Miami University Honors Theses / OhioLINK, 2006. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=muhonors1145824988.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Wohanka, Kornelia Krystyna. "Changing an entrenched policy : the 1992 reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union." Thesis, University of Sussex, 2002. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.247992.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Common Agricultural Policy"

1

Grant, Wyn. The Common Agricultural Policy. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25731-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Lintner, Valerio. The Common Agricultural Policy. 2nd ed. London: P.N.L. Press for Polytechnic of North London, European Documentation Centre., 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Christopher, Ritson, and Harvey David R, eds. The common agricultural policy. 2nd ed. New York, NY: CAB International, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Price, Wendy. The common agricultural policy. 2nd ed. London: Association of EDC Librarians, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

European Commission. Directorate-General for Agriculture., ed. The Common agricultural policy. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Wyn, Grant. The common agricultural policy. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Catholic Institute for International Relations., ed. The Common Agricultural Policy. London: CIIR, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

European Commission. Directorate-General for Agriculture., ed. The Common agricultural policy. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Confederation of Family Organisations in the European Community., ed. The Common Agricultural Policy: Policy statement. Bruxelles: Confederation of Family Organisations in the EuropeanCommunity, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Andrei, J. V., and M. C. Dragoi, eds. The common agricultural policy and Romanian agriculture. Wallingford: CABI, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781789242201.0000.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Common Agricultural Policy"

1

Arbuthnott, Hugh, and Geoffrey Edwards. "The Common Agricultural Policy." In A Common Man’s Guide to the Common Market, 74–95. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19785-9_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Hill, Brian E. "Common financing." In The Common Agricultural Policy, 91–103. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003383215-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Peterson, John, and Elizabeth Bomberg. "The Common Agricultural Policy." In Decision-Making in the European Union, 120–45. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27507-6_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Shaw, Jo, Jo Hunt, and Chloë Wallace. "The Common Agricultural Policy." In Economic and Social Law of the European Union, 203–26. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-08070-7_9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Andreosso-O’Callaghan, Bernadette. "The Common Agricultural Policy." In The Economics of European Agriculture, 89–130. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230001176_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Dinan, Desmond. "The Common Agricultural Policy." In Ever Closer Union, 333–51. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14819-6_13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Martin, John. "The Common Agricultural Policy." In The Development of Modern Agriculture, 133–66. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230599963_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Alons, Gerry, and Pieter Zwaan. "The Common Agricultural Policy." In The Routledge Handbook of European Public Policy, 245–54. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2018.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315682723-24.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Duchêne, François, Edward Szczepanik, and Wilfrid Legg. "The Common Agricultural Policy." In New Limits on European Agriculture, 7–53. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003387015-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Grant, Wyn. "Introduction." In The Common Agricultural Policy, 1–8. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25731-7_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Common Agricultural Policy"

1

Tsvyatkova, Daniela. "HEREDITARY FARMING: A SYNERGY PANEL IN THE COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY." In AGRIBUSINESS AND RURAL AREAS - ECONOMY, INNOVATION AND GROWTH 2021. University publishing house "Science and Economics", University of Economics - Varna, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.36997/ara2021.280.

Full text
Abstract:
The use of the potential of the land and the natural resources of the new generations in the separate regions are the main prerequisite and basis for the development of a certain type of multifunctional agriculture. The process of continuity should be seen as a process and not as a one-off action or event. The aim of the study is to analyze the process of inheritance in agriculture, as a socio-economic method for ensuring the viability of rural areas. The analysis is based on empirical evidence - cases from family farms and young heirs in rural areas of Bulgaria. The transfer of farm management to the next generation must be organized. Otherwise, the alternative is clear: resettlement from rural areas, a rapidly aging population and insufficient young people to enter the sector. Recognizing the importance of continuity, the Common Agricultural Policy provides training and funding to encourage young people to engage in agricultural activities.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

CZYŻEWSKI, Bazyli, Sebastian STĘPIEŃ, and Jan POLCYN. "PAYMENTS FOR PUBLIC GOODS UNDER THE COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY VERSUS MARKET FAILURES." In RURAL DEVELOPMENT. Aleksandras Stulginskis University, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.15544/rd.2017.008.

Full text
Abstract:
In the reality of the marketplace, a situation often arises where an economic surplus (rent) achieved by agricultural producers is partly taken over by related non-agricultural sectors. In this sense the category of economic rent embraces market failures related to such factors as price flexibility, and thus represents an effect of the misallocation of resources in the agricultural sector. The question therefore arises of whether there exists a developmental model of agriculture in which such market failures would be reduced. Apparently the only coherent response to this need is action taken under the paradigm of sustainable agriculture. This type of model for the sector’s functioning is supported by the objectives of the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), including through support for the supply of public goods in rural areas. This article addresses the question of whether CAP payments for public goods are a desirable systemic solution serving to reduce market failures. It is hypothesised that the financing of activity relating to the supply of public goods lessens the negative impact of the “market treadmill”, since it reduces the unexpected outflows of economic surplus away from farms, caused by agricultural prices. To verify the hypothesis, a panel regression analysis was performed on three sets: the EU-15 countries, the EU-12 countries, and – within Poland – subsectors of farms from six standard output classes. The analysis covered the years 2004–2012. The results of the computations provided confirmation of the hypothesis. It may be stated that an increase in the level of payments for public goods, as a percentage of total subsidies to agriculture, leads on average to a reduction in the drainage of economic rents through prices. It was also found that the financing of public goods under the CAP is more effective in reducing market failures in the EU-15 countries than in the EU-12.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

ZAWOJSKA, Aldona. "THE PROS AND CONS OF THE EU COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY." In RURAL DEVELOPMENT. Aleksandras Stulginskis University, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.15544/rd.2017.158.

Full text
Abstract:
The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union has generated a great deal of attention and controversy among research community, practitioners and the wider population. The aim of this study is to overview and to discuss the thoughts and comments on the CAP which have been addressed by both its proponents and its opponents in the scientific publications, political commentaries, official reports, pubic opinion surveys and social-media-based public forums. While on the one hand, recent public opinion poll (Eurobarometer 2016) indicated broad support among EU citizens for the CAP; on the other hand, other sources give some strong arguments in favour of reducing or even scrapping the CAP. The CAP supporters (including European Commission itself) highlight, among others, the benefits of this policy (environmental; cultural; social vitality; food variety, quality and security; maintaining of rural employment, etc.) for all European citizens and not only for farmers, while CAP opponents stress its unfairness both to non-farmers (e.g. huge financial costs of its policy for taxpayers) and small farmers (large farmers benefit most), heavy administrative burden for farmers as well as the CAP’s destructing impact both on the EU states’ agriculture systems and developing countries’ agricultural markets. The CAP is basically the same for all EU member states but the EU countries differ considerably in terms of their rural development. According to some views, the CAP does not fit the Central and Eastern European countries. It represents a failure of the EU to adjust adequately from an exclusively Western European institution into a proper pan-European organization.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Stromská, Eliška, Dominika Tóthová, and Katarína Melichová. "Dopady společné zemědělské politiky EU na české zemědělce v období 2014–2020." In XXIV. mezinárodního kolokvia o regionálních vědách. Brno: Masaryk University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9896-2021-70.

Full text
Abstract:
The implementation of the Common Agricultural Policy of the EU in the Czech Republic brought many changes in the functioning and financing of agriculture in the Czech Republic with political, economic, and social impacts and many challenges and threats for Czech farmers. Since the Czech Republic acceded to the EU, the Common Agricultural Policy has been reformed several times. The aim of the article is to evaluate the impact of the Common Agricultural Policy on Czech farmers in 2014–2020. The evaluation is based on a qualitative survey among selected farmers in the Moravian-Silesian and Olomouc regions. The research results show that enterprises positively evaluate financial stability and the overall protection of the agricultural sector. Support for the diversification of agriculture and support for the investment was also highlighted. On the contrary, the administrative burden, great emphasis on cross compliance rules, differences in the payments in EU countries, reducing the competitiveness of Czech agriculture and unfavourable conditions for livestock farmers were assessed negatively.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

DUDEK, Michał, and Bożena KARWAT-WOŹNIAK. "BARRIERS AND CHALLENGES IN INCREASING RURAL EMPLOYMENT: LABOUR RESOURCES AND SELECTED POLICY INSTRUMENTS. THE CASE OF EU COHESION POLICY AND COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY INTERVENTIONS IN POLAND." In RURAL DEVELOPMENT. Aleksandras Stulginskis University, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.15544/rd.2017.155.

Full text
Abstract:
An important feature of many rural markets is the over-supply of labour. An insufficient number of jobs in rural areas is usually associated with the shortage of capital, companies, consumers and skilled workers, i.e. limited impact of the agglomeration effect. Additionally, in regions with structural changes in agriculture, the phenomenon of increased or hidden unemployment is visible. One of the important objectives of labour market policy in Poland was a promotion of employment, especially in peripheral, poor and agricultural territories. Along with the accession of Poland to the EU, both agricultural and cohesion policy instruments supported by the structural funds have also been aimed at resolving the problems of rural labour markets. They concerned mainly the diversification of agricultural activities, support of entrepreneurship, as well as development of knowledge and skills. The paper considers the barriers and challenges in increasing employment in rural Poland. In particular, the changes on local rural labour markets and the influence of relevant policy tools thereon have been studied. The study is based on the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the public statistics and information on the implementation of selected EU CAP and Cohesion Policy instruments in Poland from the period 2007-2014 and the literature of the subject. The study showed that, despite the favourable economic situation and the effects of projects aimed at creating and maintaining non-agricultural jobs in rural areas supported by the EU founds, the rural employment rate and the number of people employed in agriculture did not increase significantly. In this context, the paper provides the explanation of limited improvements in terms of rural employment and policy offers recommendations in this area.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Zagorova, Krassimira. "Analysis of the Mechanism of the Common Organization of the Markets for Agricultural Products in the European Union." In 8th International Scientific Conference ERAZ - Knowledge Based Sustainable Development. Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.31410/eraz.2022.1.

Full text
Abstract:
The Common Organization of the Market for Agricultural Prod­ucts in the European Union is part of the common agricultural policy, which ensures both stable and predictable markets and resilient purchase prices, which in turn safeguards farmers’ stable earnings and provides constant supply of quality food to consumers. The aim of this study is to analyze the applicability and adaptability of the mechanism of the common organization of markets in the EU, including: its internal aspect, mainly related to interventions in the market for agricultur­al products, and its external aspect related to the trade with third countries, import and export licenses, refund of part of costs associated with exporting agricultural products produced in the Community, etc. The Common Organization of Markets, as a basis for implementing the EU Common Agricultural Policy, operates within a financial framework period­ically updated by the European Commission in order to adequately imple­ment the principle of subsidiarity, allowing EU Member States to play a key role in terms of interventions in the agricultural sector.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Kirechev, Damyan. "SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT THROUGH AGRO-ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES AND THE NEED FOR NEW POLICY." In SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT - CURRENT PRACTICES AND SOLUTIONS 2019. University publishing house "Science and Economics", University of Economics - Varna, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.36997/slm2019.125.

Full text
Abstract:
The report examines the need for a transition to a sustainable model of agriculture through the introduction of modern land use practices. Agroecology has reliable tools to ensure the environmental friendliness of modern agricultural production. Modern European agriculture is developing in compliance with ever higher standards in terms of environmental protection, biodiversity, safe food production. The challenges facing the Common Agricultural Policy are growing, necessitating the adoption of urgent action to make a successful transition to the sustainable use of agricultural land.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

MICKIEWICZ, Bartosz. "MODIFICATIONS OF THE CURRENTLY IMPLEMENTED EUROPEAN UNION COMMON POLICY CONCERNING DIRECT PAYMENTS." In RURAL DEVELOPMENT. Aleksandras Stulginskis University, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.15544/rd.2017.047.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper presents the EU trend towards simplifying of the European legislation in the Common Agricultural Policy. Author remarks the Multi-annual Financial Framework should be focused on the simplification of the CAP and points out that the law should be created in simple, transparent and understandable manner for farmers. EU Members States must respect the principles of subsidiarity, proportionality and coherence. Paying attention to direct payments, there is underlined the importance of land greening in relation to the diversification of crops and the preservation of permanent agricultural land. Author concludes that only professional farmers who have acquired payment entitlements. The review of CAP has not changed the level of funding of agricultural policy in present financial perspective.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Baigonushova, Damira, Junus Ganiev, and Mairam Baigonusheva. "Government Support of the Agricultural Sector in the EAEU Countries." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c11.02291.

Full text
Abstract:
As it is known, in 2010, a customs union with three participants, Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan, was formed on the territory of the former Soviet Union. In 2015, the union moved to another stage, the economic union. In 2015, Kyrgyzstan became a full member of this union and is currently trying to adapt to new economic conditions. In particular, the Agricultural Policy Department of the Eurasian Economic Commission is currently actively working on the development and implementation of common agricultural policy. Kyrgyzstan, despite the limited territory for agricultural production, is an agricultural country and has a comparative advantage in this sector. Therefore, the country should take an active role in the development of a common agricultural policy and create favorable conditions for the development of the own agrarian sector and use advantages. The purpose of this work is to analyze the developed plans and policies of the Agricultural Policy Department of the Eurasian Economic Commission, as well as conduct a comparative analysis with the common agricultural policy of the European Union, and at the end to make proposals.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Zawisza, Slawomir, Piotr Prus, and Szymon Beben. "Development of agricultural farms in terms of Common Agricultural Policy support in the opinion of farmers." In 20th International Scientific Conference "Economic Science for Rural Development 2019". Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies. Faculty of Economics and Social Development, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.22616/esrd.2019.033.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Common Agricultural Policy"

1

Fresco, L. O., and K. J. Poppe. Towards a common agricultural and food policy. Wageningen: Wageningen University & Research, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.18174/390280.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Matthews, Alan. Post-2013 EU Common Agricultural Policy, Trade And Development:. Geneva, Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.7215/ag_ip_20111011.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Tangermann, Stefan. Risk Management in Agriculture and the Future of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy. Geneva, Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.7215/ag_ip_20110621a.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Matthews, Alan. How Might the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy Affect Trade and Development After 2013? Geneva, Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.7215/ag_ip_20101209.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Pastuszko, Radosław Pastuszko, and Włodzimierz Gogłoza Gogłoza. The impact of European Union Common Agricultural Policy on the intensification of animal farming in Bulgaria, Romania, and the countries that have signed association agreements with the EU. Tiny Beam Fund, January 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.15868/socialsector.37974.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Keeney, Roman, and Thomas Hertel. GTAP-AGR: A Framework for Assessing the Implications of Multilateral Changes in Agricultural Policies. GTAP Technical Paper, August 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/gtap.tp24.

Full text
Abstract:
Global models of agricultural trade have a long and distinguished history. The introduction of the GTAP data base and modeling project represented a significant advance forward as it put modelers and trade policy analysts on common ground. After an initial generation of GTAP based modeling of agricultural trade policy using the standard modeling framework, individual researchers have begun introducing agricultural specificity into the standard modeling framework in order to better capture the particular features of the agricultural economy pertinent to their research questions. This technical paper follows in that same tradition by reviewing important linkages between international trade and the farm and food economy and introducing them into the standard GTAP modeling framework, offering a special purpose version of the model nicknamed GTAP-AGR. We introduce this agricultural specificity by introducing new behavioral relationships into the standard GTAP framework. We focus particular attention on the factor markets, which play a critical role in determining the incidence of producer subsidies. This includes modifying both the factor supply and derived demand equations. We also modify the specification of consumer demand, assuming separability of food from non-food commodities. Finally, we introduce the important substitution possibilities amongst feedstuffs used in the livestock sector. Where possible we support these new behavioral relationships with literature-based estimates of both the mean and standard deviation of behavioral parameters. The express purpose of this is to support systematic sensitivity analysis with respect to policy reform scenarios performed with GTAP-AGR. In addition to documenting these extensions to the standard modeling framework, the paper has an additional goal, and that is to gauge the performance of the GTAP-AGR model and how it differs from the standard GTAP framework. We do this primarily by comparing the farm level supply and demand response in terms of policy incidence for the two frameworks. In addition, we evaluate the ability of both models to reproduce observed price volatility in an effort to validate the performance of these models. Finally, we evaluate the results of the two models in a side-by-side comparison of results from full liberalization of agricultural and non-agricultural support.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Kimhi, Ayal, Barry Goodwin, Ashok Mishra, Avner Ahituv, and Yoav Kislev. The dynamics of off-farm employment, farm size, and farm structure. United States Department of Agriculture, September 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2006.7695877.bard.

Full text
Abstract:
Objectives: (1) Preparing panel data sets for both the United States and Israel that contain a rich set of farm attributes, such as size, specialization, and output composition, and farmers’ characteristics such as off-farm employment status, education, and family composition. (2) Developing an empirical framework for the joint analysis of all the endogenous variables of interest in a dynamic setting. (3) Estimating simultaneous equations of the endogenous variables using the panel data sets from both countries. (4) Analyzing, using the empirical results, the possible effects of economic policies and institutional changes on the dynamics of the farm sector. An added objective is analyzing structural changes in farm sectors in additional countries. Background: Farm sectors in developed countries, including the U.S. and Israel, have experienced a sharp decline in their size and importance during the second half of the 20th century. The overall trend is towards fewer and larger farms that rely less on family labor. These structural changes have been a reaction to changes in technology, in government policies, and in market conditions: decreasing terms of trade, increasing alternative opportunities, and urbanization pressures. As these factors continue to change, so does the structure of the agricultural sector. Conclusions: We have shown that all major dimensions of structural changes in agriculture are closely interlinked. These include farm efficiency, farm scale, farm scope (diversification), and off-farm labor. We have also shown that these conclusions hold and perhaps even become stronger whenever dynamic aspects of structural adjustments are explicitly modeled using longitudinal data. While the results vary somewhat in the different applications, several common features are observed for both the U.S. and Israel. First, the trend towards the concentration of farm production in a smaller number of larger farm enterprises is likely to continue. Second, at the micro level, increased farm size is negatively associated with increased off-farm labor, with the causality going both ways. Third, the increase in farm size is mostly achieved by diversifying farm production into additional activities (crops or livestock). All these imply that the farm sector converges towards a bi-modal farm distribution, with some farms becoming commercial while the remaining farm households either exit farming altogether or continue producing but rely heavily on off-farm income. Implications: The primary scientific implication of this project is that one should not analyze a specific farm attribute in isolation. We have shown that controlling for the joint determination of the various farm and household attributes is crucial for obtaining meaningful empirical results. The policy implications are to some extent general but could be different in the two countries. The general implication is that farm policy is an important determinant of structural changes in the farm sector. For the U.S., we have shown the different effects of coupled and decoupled (direct) farm payments on the various farm attributes, and also shown that it is important to take into account the joint farm-household decisions in order to conduct a meaningful policy analysis. Only this kind of analysis explains the indirect effect of direct farm payments on farm production decisions. For Israel, we concluded that farm policy (or lack of farm policy) has contributed to the fast structural changes we observed over the last 25 years. The sharp change of direction in farm policy that started in the early 1980s has accelerated structural changes that could have been smoother otherwise. These accelerated structural changes most likely lead to welfare losses in rural areas.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Fyfe, Caroline, Phoebe Taptiklis, Dominic White, and Niven Winchester. Review of emissions data and modelling systems (Phase 1) Report. Motu Economic and Public Policy Research, July 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.29310/wp.2023.06.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of this report is to review greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate change mi􀆟ga􀆟on data and models. Building an evidence base to monitor and assess the impacts of ini􀆟a􀆟ves is explicitly men􀆟oned in Aotearoa New Zealand’s First Emissions Reduc􀆟on Plan (05/2022). Economic-Environmental modelling plays an important role in decision making to achieve emission reduc􀆟on targets. Data is hosted by a range of organisa􀆟ons and collected using different frameworks and methodologies. There is less awareness of data available through Stats NZ which may have led to it being underused. Main collated data sources are the GHG emissions account and the GHG emissions inventory. Sector specific data are available through relevant agencies. A detailed stock-take of New Zealand’s modelling capacity iden􀆟fied 84 climate change or climate change mi􀆟ga􀆟on models: 13 mul􀆟-sector models, 23 land use and agricultural models, 25 energy models, and 23 transport models. The stock-take iden􀆟fied at least one model for each sector of the ERP, except for Building and Construc􀆟on. Modelling capacity varies between sectors with those that are more developed, demonstra􀆟ng greater interdependency between models. Almost all modelling takes a produc􀆟on-based approach. Capacity for a consump􀆟on-based approach was much more limited. Two examples of formal collabora􀆟on are iden􀆟fied through the review. No formal interna􀆟onal collabora􀆟on (outside of interna􀆟onal repor􀆟ng requirements) was iden􀆟fied. A preference was expressed for modelling in-house to facilitate alignment with policy development. However, this may have contributed to lack of collabora􀆟on on progress towards common targets. Connec􀆟ons with groups outside of government are also limited.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Hertel, Thomas, Maros Ivanic, Paul Preckel, and John Cranfield. Trade Liberalization and the Structure of Poverty in Developing Countries. GTAP Working Paper, April 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/gtap.wp25.

Full text
Abstract:
“Globalization increases poverty” is a common assertion made by critics of globalization. The proliferation of low-wage jobs and higher food prices are some of the arguments brought forward in support of this argument. One of the hallmarks of globalization is the systematic dismantling of barriers to trade. Advocates of trade liberalization – particularly industrialized country agriculture reform – argue that the ensuing rise in world prices for agriculture products will boost rural incomes, thereby reducing poverty in the poorest countries, where the bulk of world poverty resides. Who is right? The goal of this paper is take a systematic look at the structure of poverty across a range of developing countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America, and explore how national poverty rates in some of the poorest countries in the world are likely to be affected by global trade liberalization. Our analysis of the structure of poverty is based on national household surveys from 14 developing countries. While we consider both spending and earnings effects of trade liberalization, it is argued that the earnings effects will generally be the dominant factor. This is particularly true in the short run for households that are highly specialized in their earnings patterns. Consider the case of a self-employed farm household. Assuming that trade liberalization results in higher farm prices, we expect the short run effect on the returns to family labor and land to be positive, and somewhat larger in percentage terms (the so-called “magnification effect”). Furthermore, if this household is not employed off-farm, then the farm profitability effect translates directly into an income effect, and this is likely to be sufficient to lift some of the farm households out of poverty. Of course this same effect can work in reverse, with commodity price declines increasing poverty. This makes specialized households highly vulnerable to trade policy shocks. In addition to agriculture-specialized households, we focus on self-employed non-agriculture specialized households, households specialized in wage labor and those relying on transfer payments for 95% or more of their income. Together, these four types of specialized households account for an average of 56% of the poor in the 14 countries examined. Thus a majority of the poor have specialized earnings patterns and are likely to be disproportionately affected by trade liberalization. The same is not true of the non-poor, where a majority of the households are diversified, and are therefore less vulnerable to sector-specific commodity price changes. We also find that the poor are over-represented among the agriculture-specialized households. With this background, we turn to an examination of the broad effects of multilateral trade liberalization on relative commodity prices and factor returns across the 14 countries in question. We distinguish between per capita effects – or the impact of trade liberalization on the “average” household in each country, and the effects on the poorest households. Our per capita results are quite similar to other studies of multilateral trade liberalization, with most countries gaining modestly, while a few gain substantially and a few lose due to the erosion of benefits from existing preferences. Some argue that this “rising tide will lift all boats” and so the positive per capita gains from trade liberalization will reduce poverty. However, we show that the short run impact of trade liberalization on different household groups is quite varied, and not always positive. First of all, global trade liberalization tends to raise food prices – particularly for staples, relative to non-food prices. This is true in all but 2 of the countries in our sample. This food price hike has an adverse effect on the poor, relative to the per capita household, since they spend a disproportionate share of their income on food. Also, the short run earnings impacts are quite varied, with agricultural profits rising relative to per capita income in 11 of the 14 countries, while relative non-agricultural profits and wages fall in many of these countries. Thus the overall impact on poverty depends on the structure of poverty in each country – hence our emphasis on this topic. We proceed to systematically explore the impact of trade liberalization on poverty utilizing a recently developed analytical framework that combines the detailed household survey data with a global economic model in order to measure the poverty impacts of trade liberalization on the five different household strata in each country. Each of the first four strata corresponds to one of the groups of earnings-specialized households, while the fifth encompasses the diversified households in each country. We conduct our analysis at the level of one hundred income percentiles, ranging from poorest to richest in each stratum. In this way, we uncover the differential impact of trade liberalization, by country, stratum and by income level. We also calculate the change in poverty rates, both at the stratum and national levels. Our findings emphasize the differential short run poverty impacts of multilateral trade liberalization on poverty across countries, across strata, and within strata, thereby highlighting the links between the structure of poverty and the national impacts of trade liberalization.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Morales, Leonardo Fabio, and Eleonora Dávalos. Diffusion of crime control benefits: Forced eradication and coca crops in Colombia. Banco de la República Colombia, November 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.32468/dtseru.314.

Full text
Abstract:
One explanation for the increasing number of hectares with coca cultivation is that eradication strategies displace coca crops but fail to completely clear affected areas. In the drug policy literature, that dynamic shifting is commonly known as the balloon effect. This study integrates georeferenced agricultural data through spatially explicit econometric models to test the hypothesis that forced eradication displace coca crops. Using annual data for 1,116 contiguous municipalities in Colombia between 2001 and 2015, we estimate a spatial Durbin model with municipal and time fixed effects. Our results suggest that, on average, aerial fumigation in a municipality diffuses the benefits of this crime control strategy to neighboring municipalities.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Common Agricultural Policy' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography