Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Common morality / Books

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Common morality.

Books on the topic 'Common morality'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 25 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 books for your research on the topic 'Common morality.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Common-sense morality and consequentialism. London: Routledge & Kegan, 1985.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

H, Outka Gene, and Reeder John P. 1937-, eds. Prospects for a common morality. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1993.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

From morality to virtue. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Slote, Michael A. From morality to virtue. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

The common good: Citizenship, morality, and self-interest. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Bioethics and secular humanism: The search for a common morality. London: SCM Press, 1991.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

International Conference on Moral Science (2002 Kashiwa-shi, Japan). Searching for a common morality in the global age: The International Conference on Moral Science in 2002. Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, Japan: Institute of Moralogy, 2003.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

International Conference on Moral Science (2002 Kashiwa-shi, Japan). Searching for a common morality in the global age: The proceedings of the International Conference on Moral Science in 2002. New Delhi: Lancer's Books in association with Institute of Moralogy, Kashiwa-shi, Japan, 2004.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Zinken, Jörg. Requesting responsibility: The morality of grammar in Polish and English family interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Outka, Gene, and John P. Reeder. Prospects for a Common Morality. Princeton University Press, 1992.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Common-Sense Morality and Consequentialism. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Prospects for a common morality. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1992.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Slote, Michael A. Common-Sense Morality and Consequentialism. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Slote, Michael A. Common-Sense Morality and Consequentialism. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Slote, Michael. Common-Sense Morality and Consequentialism. Taylor & Francis Group, 2022.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Arras, John D., James Childress, and Matthew Adams. A Common Morality for Hedgehogs. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190665982.003.0002.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter is an exposition and assessment of Bernard Gert’s arguments for a conception of common morality as the keystone of ethics. It begins by outlining the moral rules, ideals, and decision procedures that Gert defines as constitutive of the content of common morality. It explains how Gert’s appeal to common morality differs from the role that it plays in the work of Beauchamp and Childress. The chapter then canvasses two objections to Gert’s position. The first raises doubts about whether his description of the content of common morality is accurate, particularly given that it is not supported by any rigorous empirical evidence, and the second challenges his claim that common morality does not change over time.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Outka, Gene, and John P. Reeder, eds. Prospects for a Common Morality. Princeton University Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400820818.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Slote, Michael A. Common-Sense Morality and Consequentialism. Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003049265.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Slote, Michael A. Common-Sense Morality and Consequentialism. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Slote, Michael A. Common-Sense Morality and Consequentialism. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Outka, Gene, and John P. Reeder. Prospects for a Common Morality. Princeton University Press, 1992.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Common Morality: Deciding What to Do. Oxford University Press, USA, 2007.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Common Morality: Deciding What to Do. Oxford University Press, USA, 2004.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Parfit, Derek. Act Consequentialism and Common Sense Morality. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198778608.003.0022.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter reveals some insights into act consequentialism. It begins with the claim that it would often be wrong to treat people in certain ways, such as deceiving or coercing them, or breaking our promises to them, even when such acts would make things go better. The chapter then turns to deontic and non-deontic badness. These are different kinds of badness, as is shown by cases in which such acts are not wrong, because their non-deontic badness is outweighed by the goodness of their effects. Since these acts would have this intrinsic badness, though they would not be wrong, it could not be their wrongness that made them intrinsically bad.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Gert, Bernard. Common Morality: Deciding What to Do. Ebsco Publishing, 2004.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Gert, Bernard. Common Morality: Deciding What to Do. Oxford University Press, 2004.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Sacks, Jonathan. Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times. Basic Books, 2020.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Sacks, Jonathan. Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times. Basic Books, 2020.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times. Basic Books, 2020.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Sacks, Jonathan. Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times. Hodder & Stoughton, 2021.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Sacks, Jonathan. Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times. Basic Books, 2022.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Engelhardt, H. Tristram. Bioethics and Secular Humanism: The Search for a Common Morality. Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2011.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Johnson, Pamela A. The One Common World Morality: Seeds of Thought for All Humankind. 1st Impression Publishing, 2005.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Multi-Religious Perspectives on a Global Ethic: In Search of a Common Morality. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Schweiker, William, and Myriam Renaud. Multi-Religious Perspectives on a Global Ethic: In Search of a Common Morality. Taylor & Francis Group, 2022.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Schweiker, William, and Myriam Renaud. Multi-Religious Perspectives on a Global Ethic: In Search of a Common Morality. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Schweiker, William, and Myriam Renaud. Multi-Religious Perspectives on a Global Ethic: In Search of a Common Morality. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Schweiker, William, and Myriam Renaud. Multi-Religious Perspectives on a Global Ethic: In Search of a Common Morality. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Schweiker, William, and Myriam Renaud. Multi-Religious Perspectives on a Global Ethic: In Search of a Common Morality. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Patterson, Richard G. Looking for a Better Way: Personal Reflections of Economics, Morality and Common Sense. Independently Published, 2019.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Acesprint. Summary and Analysis of Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times by Jonathan Sacks. Independently Published, 2021.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Kroeker, Esther Engels. A Common Sense Response to Hume’s Moral Atheism. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198783909.003.0006.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter presents Reid’s answers to three non-theistic implications of Hume’s moral philosophy. One non-theistic implication of Hume’s view is the claim that morality is tied to human nature, and is hence secular because it is autonomous from religious doctrines, beliefs, or motivations. Another implication is that the standard of morality is determined by human mental states and psychological processes, and hence renders all reference to an objective, mind-independent standard, unnecessary. A final implication, according to Hume, is that our human passions are not directed toward God, and hence that God is not the object of any human moral discourse. In response, Reid argues that the truth of moral principles is not relative to human nature and to natural human passions. It follows, Reid holds, that talk of a benevolent God is intelligible. Reid’s explicit objective is to criticize not only Hume’s moral philosophy, but also his moral atheism.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Morality And Economic Growth In Rural West Africa A Descriptive Economics Of The Common People Of Hausaland. Berghahn Books, 2014.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Lord, Errol. How to Learn about Aesthetics and Morality through Acquaintance and Deference. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198823841.003.0004.

Full text

Abstract:

There are parallel debates in metaethics and aesthetics about the rational merits of deferring to others about ethics and aesthetics. In both areas it is common to think that there is something amiss about deference. A popular explanation of this in aesthetics appeals to the importance of aesthetic acquaintance. This kind of explanation has not been explored much in ethics. This chapter defends a unified account of what is amiss about ethical and aesthetic deference. According to this account, deference is a non-ideal way of thinking about ethics and aesthetics because it does not allow us to possess the full range of reasons provided by the ethical and aesthetic facts. It has this feature because it does not acquaint us with ethical and aesthetic facts. It is argued further that despite this defect, there is no general obligation not to defer. The upshot is a moderate optimism about ethical and aesthetic deference.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Crisp, Roger. Sacrifice Regained. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840473.001.0001.

Full text

Abstract:

Does being virtuous make you happy? This book examines the answers to this ancient question provided by the so-called ‘British Moralists’, from about 1650 for the next two hundred years. This involves elucidating their views on happiness (self-interest, or well-being) and on virtue (or morality), in order to bring out the relation of each to the other. Themes ran through many of these writers: psychological egoism, evaluative hedonism, and—after Thomas Hobbes—the acceptance of self-standing moral reasons. But there are exceptions, and even those taking the standard views adopt them for very different reasons and express them in various ways. As the ancients tended to believe that virtue and happiness largely, perhaps entirely, coincide, so these modern authors are inclined to accept posthumous reward and punishment. Both positions sit uneasily with the common-sense idea that a person can truly sacrifice their own good for the sake of morality or for others, and the book shows that David Hume—a hedonist whose ethics made no appeal to the afterlife—was the first major British moralist to allow for, indeed to recommend, such self-sacrifice. Morality and well-being of course remain central to modern ethics, and this book demonstrates how much there is to learn from this remarkable group of philosophers.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Parfit, Derek. Towards a Unified Theory. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198778608.003.0023.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter builds towards a wider theory combining a version of common sense morality with a particular rule consequentialist justification. It asks whether the most plausible principles of common sense morality can all be given some further justification, which may appeal to some feature that these principles have in common. On one plausible hypothesis, the best principles of common sense morality are also the principles whose acceptance would on the whole make things go best. We might justifiably accept this hypothesis. The two parts of this theory, furthermore, would achieve more by being combined. Rule consequentialism would be strengthened if this theory supports that seems to be the best version of common sense morality. This version of Common Sense Morality would be similarly strengthened if it can be plausibly supported in this rule consequentialist way.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Edwards, James. An Instrumental Legal Moralism. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198828174.003.0005.

Full text

Abstract:

Many writers defend or attack the position nowadays known as legal moralism. According to the most common formulation, legal moralists endorse the following thesis: the fact that φ‎ing is morally wrong is a reason to criminalize φ‎ing. This chapter considers a different kind of legal moralism, here called instrumental legal moralism (ILM). According to ILM: the fact that criminalizing φ‎ing will probably prevent moral wrongs is a reason to criminalize φ‎ing. Section I draws some relevant distinctions. In doing so, it clarifies the difference between ILM and the act-centred legal moralism (ALM) commonly discussed in the literature. Sections II–IV consider two prominent arguments for ALM: the retributivist argument, offered by Michael Moore, and the answerability argument, offered by Antony Duff. The chapter shows that, contrary to the intentions of these authors, both arguments in fact support ILM.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Butler, S. An Essay Upon Education, Intended to Shew That the Common Method is Defective, in Religion, Morality, our own Language, History, Geography: ... By a Gentleman of Bristol. Gale ECCO, Print Editions, 2018.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Talbert, Matthew. Omission and Attribution Error. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190683450.003.0002.

Full text

Abstract:

Attributionists believe that moral responsibility has mainly to do with how a person is, and with what can be attributed to her for the purposes of moral assessment. Critics of the view have tended to charge that it proposes a standard for blameworthiness that is too easily satisfied. This chapter defends Attributionism from an opposing criticism—one that notes that many agents who are judged blameworthy by common-sense morality do not fulfill the necessary conditions on blameworthiness that Attributionism proposes. In this context, the chapter pays particular attention to cases in which agents commit apparently blameworthy unwitting omissions. It argues that such agents are often not blameworthy and offers an explanation as to why common-sense morality delivers a contrary judgment.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Lee, Marvin J. H. Two Cautions for a Common Morality Debate: Investigating the Argument from Empirical Evidence Through the Comparative Cultural Study Between Western Liberal Individualist Culture and East Asian Neo-Confucian Culture. INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2012.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!