Academic literature on the topic 'Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Communication Assessment Tool (CAT).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)"
Goba, Gelila Kidane, Jessica George, Mussie Alemayehu, Fasika Amdeslasie, Ken Divelbess, Gregory Makoul, Raymond H. Curry, and Mary D. Stephenson. "Translation, Adaptation, and Assessment of the Communication Assessment Tool in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia." Journal of Graduate Medical Education 11, no. 4s (August 1, 2019): 141–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-18-00711.
Full textMyerholtz, Linda. "Assessing Family Medicine Residents' Communication Skills From the Patient's Perspective: Evaluating the Communication Assessment Tool." Journal of Graduate Medical Education 6, no. 3 (September 1, 2014): 495–500. http://dx.doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-13-00347.1.
Full textFerranti, Darlene E., Gregory Makoul, Victoria E. Forth, Jennifer Rauworth, Jungwha Lee, and Mark V. Williams. "Assessing patient perceptions of hospitalist communication skills using the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)." Journal of Hospital Medicine 5, no. 9 (November 2010): 522–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jhm.787.
Full textDesai, Amrita, and Adam J. Olszewski. "Evaluation of the physician-patient communication assessment tool (CAT) in a hematology-oncology practice." Journal of Clinical Oncology 31, no. 31_suppl (November 1, 2013): 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.31.31_suppl.14.
Full textStausmire, Julie M., Constance P. Cashen, Linda Myerholtz, and Nancy Buderer. "Measuring General Surgery Residents’ Communication Skills From the Patient’s Perspective Using the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)." Journal of Surgical Education 72, no. 1 (January 2015): 108–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.06.021.
Full textDubosh, Nicole, Matthew Hall, Victor Novack, Tali Shafat, Nathan Shapiro, and Edward Ullman. "A Multimodal Curriculum With Patient Feedback to Improve Medical Student Communication: Pilot Study." Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 21, no. 1 (December 9, 2019): 115–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2018.11.44318.
Full textŚwiątoniowska-Lonc, Natalia, Artur Białoszewski, Gregory Makoul, and Beata Jankowska-Polańska. "Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Polish Version of the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)." Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Volume 13 (September 2020): 1533–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s261710.
Full textMercer, Laura Min, Paula Tanabe, Peter S. Pang, Michael A. Gisondi, D. Mark Courtney, Kirsten G. Engel, Sarah M. Donlan, James G. Adams, and Gregory Makoul. "Patient perspectives on communication with the medical team: Pilot study using the communication assessment tool-team (CAT-T)." Patient Education and Counseling 73, no. 2 (November 2008): 220–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.003.
Full textIon, Georgeta, Elena Cano, and Nati Cabrera. "Competency Assessment Tool (CAT). The evaluation of an innovative competency-based assessment experience in higher education." Technology, Pedagogy and Education 25, no. 5 (March 2016): 631–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2015.1134635.
Full textOttis, Erica, Katie Luetkenhaus, Lada Micheas, and Carla Dyer. "Assessing team communication with patients’ families: Findings from utilizing the Communication Assessment Tool—Team (CAT-T) in an interprofessional error disclosure simulation." Patient Education and Counseling 104, no. 9 (September 2021): 2292–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.038.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)"
Hartz, Adam J. (Adam John). "CAT-SOOP : a tool for automatic collection and assessment of homework exercises." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77086.
Full textCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 101-103).
CAT-SOOP is a tool which allows for automatic collection and assessment of various types of homework exercises. CAT-SOOP is capable of assessing a variety of exercises, including symbolic math and computer programs written in the Python programming language. This thesis describes the design and implementation of the CAT-SOOP system, as well as the methods by which it assesses these various types of exercises. In addition, the implementation of an add-on tool for providing novel forms of feedback about student-submitted computer programs is discussed.
by Adam J. Hartz.
M.Eng.
Reis, Nélida Beatriz Caldas dos. "Adaptação cultural da ferramenta Health Communication Assessment Tool." Universidade de São Paulo, 2017. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/22/22132/tde-29112017-194112/.
Full textClinical simulation has been understood as a safe and reflexive practice during the teaching/learning process in nursing. In addition, the simulation can be an opportunity for the nursing student to develop communication skills. However, there is no tool to evaluate verbal and nonverbal communication of the student in simulated environments in the Brazilian literature. The Health Communication Assessment Tool (HCAT) is a tool developed by American researchers, disseminated in some universities and countries, proved to be valid and reliable for such demand, and evaluates the communication of nursing students in clinical simulation. The general objective of this study is to develop a cultural adaptation of the Health Communication Assessment Tool -HCAT to Brazilian Portuguese. This is a methodological research, authorized by the Research Ethics Committee involving Human Beings. The Health Communication Assessment Tool (HCAT) is a scale compounded by 24 statements - altered by the original authors to 22 statements during the course of this research - that seeks to evaluate the use or lack of use of interpersonal communication and communication behaviors in health (verbal or nonverbal). In order to develop the cultural adaptation, the theoretical-methodological frame work elaborated by Guillemin, Bombardier and Beaton (1993) and enhanced by Ferrer et al. (1996) was used: a) initial translation from the original to Portuguese; b) evaluation by the Judges Committee; c) back-translation; d) semantic evaluation of the items; e) pre-test and analysis of the adapted measures which will be carried out in later study. This research was developed at a public higher education institution in the state of São Paulo. The initial translation to Portuguese was done by two translators, independently, giving rise to the first consensual version in Portuguese, which consisted of 16 statements of the first translated version, 05 of the second translated version, and the other statements (09, 11, 4, 20) were identical in both the translations. Afterwards, the first consensual version in Portuguese was submitted to a Judges Committee for evaluation of semantic, idiomatic, cultural and conceptual equivalences between the original version and the Brazilian version; at this stage there was more than 80% agreement among the judges in all the statements, resulting in the second consensual version in Portuguese. The back translation was submitted to the final authors for evaluation, who suggested the exclusion of two statements in order to adapt the tool to the new version in English. In what concerns the Semantic Evaluation, 10 nursing professors distributed among the Northeast (2), Southeast (4) and South (4) of Brazil were invited by e-mail and semantically evaluated each of the statements of the Brazilian version of the HCAT. All items showed an agreement in evaluation above 80%, with the exception of the statement \"8\" which had 70% agreement. The pre-test and analysis of the adapted measures, not developed in this study, represent the completion of the validation process of HCAT for Brazil. The tool shall be used by a representative sample of nursing teachers or educators who work in clinical simulation. The Brazilian version of the HCAT was considered culturally adapted to Brazil and can be useful to evaluate the communicative ability of nursing students during clinical simulation scenarios
Henson, Dalana Marie. "An Intensive Aphasia Needs Assessment Tool." TopSCHOLAR®, 2016. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/1570.
Full textWolverton, Cheryl Lynn. "Staff nurse perceptions' of nurse manager caring behaviors| Psychometric testing of the Caring Assessment Tool-Administration (CAT-adm(c))." Thesis, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, 2016. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10133766.
Full textCaring relationships established between nurse managers and staff nurses promote positive work environments. However, research about staff nurses’ perceptions of nurse manager caring behaviors is limited. A 94-item Caring Assessment Tool-Administration (CAT-adm©) was developed to measure staff nurses’ perceptions of nurse managers’ caring behaviors; however, it lacked robust psychometric testing. This study was undertaken to establish the CAT-adm© survey as a reliable and valid tool to measure staff nurses’ perceptions of nurse managers’ caring behaviors.
The Quality-Caring Model® (QCM®) served as the theoretical framework. Specific aims were to 1) evaluate construct validity of the CAT-adm© survey by describing factors that account for variance in staff nurses' perceptions of nurse manager caring, 2) estimate internal consistency, and 3) conduct item reduction analysis. Four research questions were: 1) Will the factor structure of observed data fit an 8-factor solution? 2) What is the internal consistency reliability of the CAT- adm©? 3) What items can be reduced while maintaining an acceptable factor structure? and 4) What are staff nurses’ perceptions of nurse manager caring behaviors?
A cross-sectional descriptive design was used. A sample of 703 staff nurses from Midwestern, Midatlantic and Southern Regions of the U.S. completed the CAT-adm© survey electronically. Analysis included Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), univariate analysis, and descriptive statistics. CFA did not support an 8-factor solution. EFA supported a two-factor solution and demonstrated significant shared variance between the two factors. This shared variance supported a one-factor solution that could conceptually be labeled Caring Behaviors. Random selection reduced the scale to 25-items while maintaining a Cronbach’s Alpha of .98. Using the new 25-item scale, the composite score mean of staff nurses’ perceptions of nurse manager caring behaviors indicated a moderately high level of caring. Suggestions for nursing administration, nurse manager practice, leadership, education and for future research were given.
The new 25-item CAT-adm© survey has acceptable reliability and validity. The 25-item CAT-adm© survey provides hospital administrators, nurse managers, and researchers with an instrument to collect valuable information about the caring behaviors used by nurse managers in relationship with staff nurses.
Theunissen, Karen Sunette. "A critical review of the validity of the Credibility Assessment Tool (CAT) and its application to the screening of suspected malingering." Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/6516.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: Malingering, the intentional simulation or exaggeration of symptoms for secondary gain, has a significant financial impact on disability insurance given its prevalence. Multidisciplinary professionals involved in disability determination therefore require a tool which would assist in the screening of suspected malingerers. AIM: The Credibility Assessment Tool (CAT), a tool which was developed as part of the Performance APGAR, was reviewed in terms of its validity and application to the screening of malingering. Research objectives included the review of face and content validity through a literature review and concept analysis, as well as the review of construct and concurrent validity by comparing the results with the operationalised malingering construct and available malingering protocols. The adapted Slick criteria as proposed by Aronoff, applicable to chronic pain, neurocognitive, neurological and psychiatric symptoms, was identified as the most suitable criterion standard for use of comparison. DESIGN: The research design was a descriptive analytical design, which was performed retrospectively with a report review from insurance referrals to the researcher. Informed consent was obtained from insurers who legally own the reports. A saturated sample of convenience of 184 cases with depression and pain as predominant symptoms were analysed. Recall bias were minimised through omission of personal identifiers and the use of a peer check of 20 random cases. Results in the peer check were suggestive of poor inter-rater reliability, rather than recall bias. METHOD: Cases were analysed according to the guidelines from the respective authors of the CAT and adapted Slick criteria, however this was further defined to ensure that the study could be replicated. RESULTS: Face validity was adequate in terms of purpose, item selection and association between consistency criteria, however require improvement in terms of standardised instruction and weighting of the scale. Content validity was rated as adequate to excellent, given that it supports criteria linked to the malingering construct. Construct validity was adequate as demonstrated by association between concepts obtained through concept analysis. Correlation between the CAT and adapted Slick was strong (r>0.5) however caution is expressed that this requires further research. CONCLUSION: Recommendations for further research included the review of content validity with subject experts, criterion and predictive valid through a case-control study of known-groups, as well as the reliability of the CAT, and the use of specialised ADL indices for malingering detection. Adaptation to the CAT was depicted in the proposed Consistency Assessment Tool.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Malingering, die opsetlike nabootsing of oordrywing van simptome vir sekondêre gewin, het ‘n beduidende finansiële impak op ongeskiktheidsversekering as gevolg van die prevalensie daarvan. Multidissiplinêre professionele persone betrokke by ongeskiktheidsevaluasies het daarom ‘n meetinstrument nodig om moontlike malingeerders te identifiseer. DOEL: Die Credibility Assessment Tool (CAT), wat ontwikkel was as deel van die Performance APGAR, was ondersoek in terme van geldigheid en toepassing op malingering. Navorsingsdoelwitte het die ondersoek van voorkoms- en inhoudsgeldigheid deur ‘n literatuurstudie en konsep analise behels, sowel as konstruk- en korrelasie geldigheid deur die vergelyking van die resultate met beskikbare malingering protokolle en operasionele konstrukte. Die aangepaste Slick kriteria soos voorgestel deur Aronoff, wat toepaslik is op kroniese pyn, neurokognitiewe, neurologiese en psigiatriese simptome, was ge-identifiseer as die meeste gepaste kriterium standaard vir vergelyking. ONTWERP: Die studieontwerp was ‘n beskrywende analitiese studie wat retrospektief uitgevoer was deur ‘n ondersoek van verslae van versekeraars. Ingeligte toestemming was verkry van versekeraars wat die wetlike eienaars van die verslae is. ‘n Gerieflikheidsteekproef van 184 gevalle met depressie en pyn as hoof simptome was geanaliseer. Sydighede was verminder deur persoonlike inligting te verwyder en die gebruik van ‘n eweknie evaluasie van 20 ewekansige getrekte gevalle. Voorlopige resultate dui onbevredigende betroubaarheid aan, eerder as sydighede. METODE: Gevalle was ge-evalueer volgends die riglyne van die verskeie outeure van die CAT en aangepaste Slick kriteria, en was sodanig verder gedefinieer om te verseker dat die studie herhaal kan word. RESULTATE: Voorkomsgeldigheid was voldoende, maar verbetering is aanbeveel in terme van gestandardiseerde instruksie en skaal verdeling. Inhoudsgeldigheid was beduidend in vergelyking met die wetenskaplike literatuur en die geoperasionaliseerde konstrukte. Konstrukgeldigheid was bevestig deur die positiewe verhoudings tussen die aangepaste Slick en CAT kriteria. ‘n Sterk korrelasie was gevind tussen die aangepaste Slick en CAT, maar hierdie moet versigtig geinterpreteer word aangesien verdere navorsing verlang word. GEVOLGTREKKING: Aanbevelings vir verdere navorsing sluit in die ondersoek van die inhoudsgeldigheid met eksperte, kriterium- en voorspellingsgeldigheid, sowel as die betroubaarheid van die CAT en die gebruik van gespesialiseerde ADL indekse vir uitkenning van malingering. Aanpassing vir die CAT word ook voorgestel.
Essam, Obyda. "The development of the endodontic complexity assessment tool (E-CAT) for assessing endodontic complexity and its prevalence in general dental practice." Thesis, University of Liverpool, 2018. http://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3022453/.
Full textFrey, Terrell Kody. "CAT IN THE CLASSROOM: UNDERSTANDING INSTRUCTOR BEHAVIOR AND STUDENT PERCEPTIONS THROUGH COMMUNICATION ACCOMMODATION THEORY." UKnowledge, 2019. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/comm_etds/85.
Full textWhitehead, Kirsten Anne. "The development of a tool for the assessment of communication skills for behaviour change in dietetics." Thesis, University of Nottingham, 2014. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.659285.
Full textEkström, Elin, and Jonna Halonen. "Hydro-climatic Risk Assessment and Communication for Smallholder Farmers in Maharashtra." Thesis, KTH, Hållbar utveckling, miljövetenskap och teknik, 2021. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-297360.
Full textSmåskaliga jordbrukare är goda entreprenörer som samlat på sig kunskaper och erfarenheter över flera generationer. Däremot är vissa metoder som jordbrukarna använder sig av idag för att förvalta sitt jordbruk inte anpassade till nutida klimatförändringar. För att jordbrukarna ska förstå riskerna som de åtar sig vid valet av dessa metoder försöker forskare vid TU Delft nu ta fram ett verktyg för att underlätta jordbrukares förmåga att ta självständiga men välgrundade beslut om sitt jordbruk. Verktyget är baserat på en socio-hydrologisk modell som är framtagen i Python och som förser specifika investerings- och inkomstdata för enskilda jordbrukare. Syftet med detta kandidatarbete är att bidra till verktyget genom att undersöka de hydroklimatiska risker som uppstår till följd av föränderliga och osäkra klimatologiska förhållanden för jordbrukare i delstaten Maharashtra, Indien. Två riskfaktorer karakteriserades baserat på en litteraturstudie om indiska jordbrukares riskuppfattningar: avvikelser i starten på den indiska sommarmonsunen och antal torrperioder under monsunsäsongen. Dessutom utfördes en känslighetsanalys för att undersöka om och hur den existerande modellens utdata av skörd påverkades av de valda riskfaktorerna. Monsunstarten och torrperioderna togs fram genom metoder som enbart använde historiska nederbördsdata över tidsperioden 2003-2016 och kombinerades sedan med hjälp av en tvådimensionell riskmatris. Resultaten visade att det fanns anledning att ifrågasätta hur torrperioderna definierades och att det kan vara mer fördelaktigt att undersöka vattenbrist för grödan, snarare än att enbart förlita sig på nederbördsdata. Vidare föreslog denna studie en metod för att översätta en kumulativ fördelningsfunktion till en grafisk riskframställning som är anpassad till användare med låg läskunnighet genom att kombinera siffror med text, grafik, färg och ljudförklaringar. I slutändan kan dock inte användbarheten av verktyget enbart avgöras utifrån litteratur, utan måste även inkludera återkoppling från slutanvändarna.
Burger, Debora. "The development and validation of a modified Situation-Background-Assessment-recommendation (SBAR) communication tool for reporting early signs of deterioration in patients." Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16553.
Full textBackground: Errors in communication are prevalent in healthcare and affect patient safety and cause unnecessary patient deaths. Reporting early signs of physiological or clinical deterioration could improve patient safety and prevent 'failure to rescue' or unexpected intensive care admissions, cardiac arrest or death. The structured Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (SBAR) communication tool enables nurses to provide doctors with pertinent information about a deteriorating patient in a logical order, based on a complete assessment. In addition, nurses have increased confidence in their findings and are better able to initiate a call and to convince a doctor to provide orders promptly or see a patient. Aim: The aim of this sub-study of a randomized controlled trial was to develop and validate a modified SBAR communication tool incorporating components of a local MEWS vital signs observations chart. Methods: The modified SBAR communication tool was developed following a review of available published examples and validated by employing a mixed methods approach: 1) cognitive interviews (n=3 nurses, 2 doctors), 2) determining the index of content validity with nurses (n=5), physicians (n=5) and surgeons (n=8) and 3) inter-rater reliability testing, with calculation of kappa values (n=2 nurses). Results: Cognitive interviews prompted more changes to the modified SBAR communication tool than determined by the content validity index. For cognitive interviews, there were 15/42 (35.71 %) modifications: 11 items were added (26.19 %) and three removed, (7.14 %) resulting in 49 items whereas for content validity index there were 4/49 (8.16%) modifications, 5/49 (10.20%) items removed and one item added (2.04%). Four of 49 items (8.16%) rated as relevant by <70% of nurses and doctors were revised or deleted. No additional modifications were needed following review by surgeons, as all items were rated as relevant by the pre-determined ≥70% of experts. Inter-rater reliability of the SBAR tool was established by two nurses who were mostly in substantial to full agreement on 37/45 items on the modified tool. The exceptions were: 'Calling from' (Cohen's Kappa-0.05) and 'this is a change from' (Cohen's Kappa-0.07), representing agreement below the level of chance. However, the high percentage agreement and nature of the questions suggest that the questions are sound. Percentage agreement amongst participants for these items was 91 % (95% confidence interval (CI): 71 to 99 ) and 86% (95% CI: 65 to 97 ) respectively. Deciding whether a doctor should see the patient now (Cohen's Kappa 0.09) or in the next 30 minutes, achieved fair agreement (Cohen's Kappa 0.20). This reflects a difference in clinical judgement as the decision when to call for assistance depended on the individual nurse's clinical judgement. IRR was not possible to test on 4/45 items, as those items required a response by the person being summoned. Overall, nine of 42 items were removed, 12 were added and 19 substantially modified, leaving 45 items. Conclusion: The modified SBAR communication tool was valid and reliable for use in a local context in conjunction with the Cape Town Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) vital EWS) vital signs chart.
Books on the topic "Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)"
Roundtable, Sustainable Rangelands. Sustainable ranch management assessment guidebook: A communication tool for agencies, ranchers, and technical service providers. Laramie, Wyo.]: University of Wyoming Cooperative Extension Service, 2011.
Find full textPitt, Leyland F. The World Wide Web as an industrial marketing communication tool: Models for the identification and assessment of opportunities. Henley-on-Thames: Henley Management College, 1996.
Find full textKon'kov, Vladimir, and Tat'yana Surikova. Linguistic foundations of business communication. ru: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1062745.
Full textOffice, General Accounting. Export controls: Assessment of Commerce Department's foreign policy report to Congress : report to the Congress. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1986.
Find full textOffice, General Accounting. Export controls: Assessment of Commerce Department's report on missile technology controls : report to the Congress. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1988.
Find full textMalita, Laura, and Vanna Boffo, eds. Digital Storytelling for Employability. Florence: Firenze University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.36253/978-88-6453-181-6.
Full textManitoba. Manitoba Education and Training., ed. Foundations for augmentative and alternative communications: A decision-making and assessment tool. Winnipeg, Man: Manitoba Education and Training, 1995.
Find full textHogg, Jenny. Delirium. Oxford University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199644957.003.0040.
Full textGene, J. Ph d. Brutten, and Ph d. Vanryckeghem Martine. The Behavior Assessment Battery Communication Attitude Test (CAT): Reorder Pack of 25 Sets of Forms. Plural Publishing, 2006.
Find full textRosen, David H., and Uyen B. Hoang. The Patient-Centered Interview. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190628871.003.0005.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)"
Abbas, Hassan, Azka Rizwan, Attiya Baqai, Daniyal Ahmed, Taha Hussain, Munazza Naeem, and Adeel Raja. "An Android Based Assessment Tool for the Visually Impaired." In Sustainable Communication Networks and Application, 1–11. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34515-0_1.
Full textWebb, Mary, Stylianos Hatzipanagos, Jonathan San Diego, Ehsan Khan, and Mateusz Goral. "Assessment for Blended Learning Scenarios: A Decision Support Tool." In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 221–30. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74310-3_24.
Full textTeaf, C. M., and J. M. Kuperberg. "Risk Assessment, Risk Management & Risk Communication." In Risk Assessment as a Tool for Water Resources Decision-Making in Central Asia, 1–15. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1050-4_1.
Full textChouhan, Aasma, Supriya Pathak, and Reshma Tendulkar. "Chatbots for Coronavirus: Detecting COVID-19 Symptoms with Virtual Assessment Tool." In EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing, 275–304. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68936-0_14.
Full textEge, Pınar. "Chapter 5: Mean Length of Utterance as a Tool for Morphological Assessment in Turkish Children." In Communication Disorders in Turkish, edited by Seyhun Topbaş and Mehmet Yavaş, 105–18. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.21832/9781847692474-010.
Full textPedrazzoli, Paolo, Marino Alge, Andrea Bettoni, and Luca Canetta. "Modeling and Simulation Tool for Sustainable MC Supply Chain Design and Assessment." In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 342–49. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40352-1_43.
Full textCarias, Juan Francisco, Saioa Arrizabalaga, and Josune Hernantes. "Cyber Resilience Strategic Planning and Self-assessment Tool for Operationalization in SMEs." In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 259–73. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81469-4_21.
Full textChaturvedi, Pratik, Akshit Arora, and Varun Dutt. "Interactive Landslide Simulator: A Tool for Landslide Risk Assessment and Communication." In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 231–43. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41627-4_21.
Full textCohen, Andrew, Katie Candland, and Elizabeth Lee. "The Effect of a Teacher-Designed Assessment Tool on an Instructor’s Cognitive Activity." In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 405–9. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-5041-2896-4_70.
Full textBieker, Felix, Nicholas Martin, Michael Friedewald, and Marit Hansen. "Data Protection Impact Assessment: A Hands-On Tour of the GDPR’s Most Practical Tool." In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 207–20. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92925-5_13.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)"
Farhangmehr, Farzaneh, and Irem Y. Tumer. "The Capture, Assessment and Communication Tool for Uncertainty Simulation (CACTUS) in Complex Systems." In ASME 2008 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. ASMEDC, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2008-66975.
Full textNavarro, Jose, Bosch Josep Lluis, Palacín María, Marina Solé, Rita Berger, David Leiva, Francesca Ceppi, and Júlia Castellano. "Teamwork: Assessment of teamwork competence in higher education." In Third International Conference on Higher Education Advances. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica València, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/head17.2017.5507.
Full textErcegovac, Petra, Ana Globočnik Žunac, and Petra Tišler. "Employee personality assessment applying the DISC method." In Kvaliteta-jučer, danas, sutra (Quality-yesterday, today, tomorrow), edited by Miroslav Drljača. Croatian Quality Managers Society, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.52730/xfak2552.
Full textLeong, Ming, Abdelaziz Bazoune, David R. Wallace, Victor Tang, and Warren P. Seering. "Towards a Tool for Characterizing the Progression of Academic Research." In ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASMEDC, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2011-48441.
Full textVidaurre, Ana, José M. Messeguer-Dueñas, Jaime Riera, José Molina Mateo, José Antonio Gómez-Tejedor, M. Amparo Gámiz-González, and Isabel Tort Ausina. "Is the Lessons tool useful to support students learning?" In INNODOCT 2018. València: Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/inn2018.2018.8830.
Full textHowell, Barbara. "Making a CASE for Using the Students Choice of Software or Systems Development Tools." In InSITE 2004: Informing Science + IT Education Conference. Informing Science Institute, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/2801.
Full textIbrahim, Ilham H., and Constantin Chassapis. "Quantitative Assessment of the Risk of Variations During Medical Device Lifecycle." In ASME 2013 Conference on Frontiers in Medical Devices: Applications of Computer Modeling and Simulation. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/fmd2013-16109.
Full textHorauer, Martin, Eric Armengaud, and Andreas Steininger. "Concepts and Tools for the Test of the Communication Sub-System of Time-Triggered Distributed Embedded Systems." In ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASMEDC, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2007-34439.
Full textSweat-Guy, Retta, and Nicole Buzzetto-More. "A Comparative Analysis of Common E-Portfolio Features and Available Platforms." In InSITE 2007: Informing Science + IT Education Conference. Informing Science Institute, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/3108.
Full textEksuzian, Daniel, Steve VanderArk, Walter Sipes, and Christopher Flynn. "Development of the Space Flight Cognitive Assessment Tool (S-CAT)." In International Conference On Environmental Systems. 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA, United States: SAE International, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/1999-01-2098.
Full textReports on the topic "Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)"
Trujillo-Dalbey, Francisca. Ethnography of Communication as on Organizational Communication Assessment Tool: A Test of the Method. Portland State University Library, May 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.7331.
Full textCoulson, Saskia, Melanie Woods, Drew Hemment, and Michelle Scott. Report and Assessment of Impact and Policy Outcomes Using Community Level Indicators: H2020 Making Sense Report. University of Dundee, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.20933/100001192.
Full text