Relevant bibliographies by topics / Communication confidence rating scale for aphasia

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses

Academic literature on the topic 'Communication confidence rating scale for aphasia'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 6 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Communication confidence rating scale for aphasia.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Communication confidence rating scale for aphasia"

1

Babbitt, Edna M., Patrick Semik, Allen Heinemann, and Leora R. Cherney. "Does type of aphasia impact change on the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA)?" Aphasiology 32, sup1 (July 26, 2018): 9–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1487925.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Cherney, Leora R., Edna M. Babbitt, Patrick Semik, and Allen W. Heinemann. "Psychometric Properties of the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA): Phase 1." Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 18, no. 4 (July 2011): 352–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/tsr1804-352.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Babbitt, Edna M., Allen W. Heinemann, Patrick Semik, and Leora R. Cherney. "Psychometric properties of the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA): Phase 2." Aphasiology 25, no. 6-7 (January 10, 2011): 727–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2010.537347.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Steele, Richard D., Allison Baird, Denise McCall, and Lisa Haynes. "Combining Teletherapy and On-line Language Exercises in the Treatment of Chronic Aphasia: An Outcome Study." International Journal of Telerehabilitation 6, no. 2 (January 29, 2015): 3–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2014.6157.

Full text
Abstract:
We report a 12-week outcome study in which nine persons with long-term chronic aphasia received individual and group speech-language teletherapy services, and also used on-line language exercises to practice from home between therapy sessions. Participants were assessed at study initiation and completion using the Western Aphasia Battery, a portion of the Communicative Effectiveness Index, ASHA National Outcome Measurement System, and RIC Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia; additionally participants were polled regarding satisfaction at discharge. Pre-treatment and post-treatment means were calculated and compared, and matched t-tests were used to determine significance of improvements following treatment, with patterns of independent on-line activity analyzed. Analysis of scores shows that means improved on most measures following treatment, generally significantly: the WAB AQ improved +3.5 (p = .057); the CETI Overall (of items administered) — +17.8 (p = .01), and CCRSA Overall — + 10.4 (p = .0004). Independent work increased with time, and user satisfaction following participation was high.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

de Jong-Hagelstein, Marjolein, Lieke Kros, Hester F. Lingsma, Diederik W. J. Dippel, Peter J. Koudstaal, and Evy G. Visch-Brink. "Expert Versus Proxy Rating of Verbal Communicative Ability of People with Aphasia after Stroke." Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 18, no. 6 (November 2012): 1064–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1355617712000811.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractIn randomized clinical trials of aphasia treatment, a functional outcome measure like the Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (ANELT), administered by speech-language therapists, is often used. However, the agreement between this expert rating and the judgment of the proxy about the quality of the daily life communication of the person with aphasia is largely unknown. We examined the association between ANELT scores by speech-language therapists and proxy judgments on the Partner Communication Questionnaire both at 3 and 6 months in 39 people with aphasia after stroke. We also determined which factors affected the level of agreement between expert and proxy judgment of the communicative ability at 6 months in 53 people with aphasia. We found moderate agreement (at 3 months r = .662; p = < .0001 and at 6 months r = .565; p = .0001), with proxies rating slightly higher than experts. Less severe aphasia, measured with the Aphasia Severity Rating Scale, was associated with better agreement. In conclusion, although proxies were slightly more positive than experts, we found moderate agreement between expert and proxy rating of verbal communicative ability of people with aphasia after stroke, especially in milder cases. (JINS, 2012, 18, 1064–1070)
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Wilssens, Ineke, Dorien Vandenborre, Kim van Dun, Jo Verhoeven, Evy Visch-Brink, and Peter Mariën. "Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy Versus Intensive Semantic Treatment in Fluent Aphasia." American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 24, no. 2 (May 2015): 281–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2015_ajslp-14-0018.

Full text
Abstract:
Objective The authors compared the effectiveness of 2 intensive therapy methods: Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy (CIAT; Pulvermüller et al., 2001) and semantic therapy (BOX; Visch-Brink & Bajema, 2001). Method Nine patients with chronic fluent aphasia participated in a therapy program to establish behavioral treatment outcomes. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups (CIAT or BOX). Results Intensive therapy significantly improved verbal communication. However, BOX treatment showed a more pronounced improvement on two communication—namely, a standardized assessment for verbal communication, the Amsterdam Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (Blomert, Koster, & Kean, 1995), and a subjective rating scale, the Communicative Effectiveness Index (Lomas et al., 1989). All participants significantly improved on one (or more) subtests of the Aachen Aphasia Test (Graetz, de Bleser, & Willmes, 1992), an impairment-focused assessment. There was a treatment-specific effect. BOX treatment had a significant effect on language comprehension and semantics, whereas CIAT treatment affected language production and phonology. Conclusion The findings indicate that in patients with fluent aphasia, (a) intensive treatment has a significant effect on language and verbal communication, (b) intensive therapy results in selective treatment effects, and (c) an intensive semantic treatment shows a more striking mean improvement on verbal communication in comparison with communication-based CIAT treatment.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Xin, Jiawei, Xuanyu Huang, Xiaodong Pan, Lin Lin, Mingyao Sun, Chen Liu, and Qinyong Ye. "Risk Factors for Aphasia in Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases." Current Neurovascular Research 16, no. 2 (July 10, 2019): 107–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1567202616666190227202638.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: Lacunes and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) are two common findings seen on neuroimaging in patients with cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD). Clinically we observed that some patients with cSVD have aphasia through the language assessment scale. Our study aimed to explore the underlying risk factors for aphasia in cSVD patients. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 38 patients, with and without aphasia, aged 50 or over, Chinese Han population, diagnosed as cSVD with lacunes and/or WMH. We collected demographic characteristics and vascular risk factors. The severity of WMH was assessed by the age related white matter changes (ARWMC) rating scale. Results: Risk factors associated with aphasia were: lower education (p = 0.029), higher total cholesterol (TC) levels (p = 0.023), and higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (p = 0.027). After controlling for age and sex, levels of TC (odds ratios, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-3.62; p = 0.032) remained associated with aphasia independently. Conclusion: High level of TC was significantly associated with a higher risk of aphasia in clinically silent cSVD patients. Early interventions including lipid-lowering treatment, cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ARWMC rating scale should be performed. Further studies are needed to explore proper methods of prevention and treatment for aphasia in clinically silent cSVD patients, in addition to understanding the pathophysiological mechanism.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ryan, Brooke, Kyla Hudson, Linda Worrall, Nina Simmons-Mackie, Emma Thomas, Emma Finch, Kathy Clark, and Jennifer Lethlean. "The Aphasia Action, Success, and Knowledge Programme: Results from an Australian Phase I Trial of a Speech-Pathology-Led Intervention for People with Aphasia Early Post Stroke." Brain Impairment 18, no. 3 (March 30, 2017): 284–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/brimp.2017.5.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: Speech pathologists work to optimise communication and reduce the emotional and social impact of communication disability in patients with aphasia but need evidence-based interventions to effectively do so.Objective: This phase 1 study aims to evaluate an Australian speech-pathology-led intervention called the Aphasia Action, Success, and Knowledge (Aphasia ASK) programme for patients with aphasia early post stroke.Methods: A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was utilised. The intervention included up to six individual face-to-face sessions with seven participants with aphasia and their nominated family member(s). Quantitative outcomes assessing mood, quality of life, and communication confidence were conducted for the participants with aphasia. Follow-up interviews were conducted with both participants with aphasia and family members to determine their perceptions of the programme.Results: Significant improvements were found in communication confidence and mood after treatment and the gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Participants with aphasia and their family members reported a good level of satisfaction with the programme.Conclusions: Findings suggest the Aphasia ASK programme is a suitable intervention with positive initial outcomes for people with aphasia. A larger scale evaluation with a greater variety of participants is now required. An Australian cluster randomised control trial is planned.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

El Hachioui, Hanane, Evy G. Visch-Brink, Hester F. Lingsma, Mieke W. M. E. van de Sandt-Koenderman, Diederik W. J. Dippel, Peter J. Koudstaal, and Huub A. M. Middelkoop. "Nonlinguistic Cognitive Impairment in Poststroke Aphasia." Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 28, no. 3 (November 8, 2013): 273–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968313508467.

Full text
Abstract:
Background and objectives. Information on cognitive impairment in aphasic patients is limited. Our aim was to investigate the prevalence and course of nonlinguistic cognitive impairments in the first year after stroke and their association with aphasia and functional outcome. Methods. We included 147 patients with acute aphasia. At 3 months and 1 year, we assessed cognition with a nonlinguistic cognitive examination including abstract reasoning, visual memory, visual perception and construction, and executive functioning. We assessed language with a verbal communication rating (Aphasia Severity Rating Scale), the ScreeLing (a linguistic-level screening test), and the Token Test. We evaluated functional outcome with the modified Rankin scale and registered the use of antidepressants. Results. In total, 107 (88%) patients had impairments in at least one nonlinguistic cognitive domain at 3 months and 91 (80%) at 1 year. The most frequently observed impairment concerned visual memory (83% at 3 months; 78% at 1 year) and the least frequent visual perception and construction (19% at 3 months; 14% at 1 year). There was improvement on all cognitive domains including language, except for abstract reasoning. Patients with persisting aphasia had lower cognitive domain scores, worse functional outcome, and were more often depressed than patients who had recovered from aphasia. Conclusions. Standard nonlinguistic cognitive examination is recommended in aphasic stroke patients. Nonlinguistic cognitive impairments are common and associated with poor functional outcome and depression, especially in patients with persisting aphasia.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Fox, Lynn E. "AAC Collaboration Using the Self-Anchored Rating Scales (SARS): An Aphasia Case Study." Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication 21, no. 4 (December 2012): 136–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/aac21.4.136.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The self-anchored rating scale (SARS) is a technique that augments collaboration between Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) interventionists, their clients, and their clients' support networks. SARS is a technique used in Solution-Focused Brief Therapy, a branch of systemic family counseling. It has been applied to treating speech and language disorders across the life span, and recent case studies show it has promise for promoting adoption and long-term use of high and low tech AAC. I will describe 2 key principles of solution-focused therapy and present 7 steps in the SARS process that illustrate how clinicians can use the SARS to involve a person with aphasia and his or her family in all aspects of the therapeutic process. I will use a case study to illustrate the SARS process and present outcomes for one individual living with aphasia.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Communication confidence rating scale for aphasia"

1

Fair, Jenny L. "Outcomes of a Life Participation Approach to Aphasia Treatment in Persons with Aphasia: The correlation between dose and confidence." The Ohio State University, 2017. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1500326709243888.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Communication confidence rating scale for aphasia' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography